Freedom4um

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Dead Constitution
See other Dead Constitution Articles

Title: Gay Trash Sponsored by WalMart
Source: Church Militant
URL Source: https://www.churchmilitant.com/news ... s-to-nudity-lewdness-vulgarity
Published: Jul 27, 2017
Author: Peter LaBarbera
Post Date: 2017-07-27 11:15:23 by noone222
Keywords: None
Views: 527
Comments: 3

New York City's annual homosexual "Pride" parade — sponsored Sunday (June 28, 2015) for the first time at the highest "Platinum" level by Walmart Corporation — featured nudity, lewdness, vulgarity and even a sadomasochism float — subjecting the many young children who either marched in or viewed the parade to behaviors and messages that are highly inappropriate for their age and emotional immaturity. [See photos below.]

This AFTAH writer observed most of the parade, which was dominated by major corporate sponsors. One of the bases for the Supreme Court's stunningly radical June 26 ruling creating a "constitutional right" for homosexual "marriage" is that it "safeguards children and families." But in truth homosexual parenting harms kids in a variety of ways. It was precisely homosexual (and pro-"gay") parents who brought impressionable children to observe this highly-sexualized parade glorifying immorality and gender confusion. This is just one example, but a very troubling one, of how "gay parenting" harms children.

I asked a woman who was hostile to me being there about the propriety of exposing kids to lewd behaviors and vulgarity. She said she didn't agree with everything that goes on at the "pride" parade but that nobody was forcing people to attend it. However, that right to choose does not extend to minor children, who are taken to such bawdy events by their parents and subjected to the perverseness and homo-eroticism that naturally flow from a parade celebrating deviant sex and gender. One such child was a girl standing next to me who appeared to be about 10 or 11; she was evidently dropped off by her father (I saw a man check on her once), who left her alone for hours to view the "pride" parade.

"Gay" Bully Exercises Special Rights At one point half-way through the parade, as I stood near the corner of Fifth Avenue and 10th Street (near the homosexual “pride”-celebrating Church of the Ascension), two homosexual activists, a man and a woman, started verbally challenging me, escalating to outright harassment. They had figured out that I was not a homosexual enthusiast and were upset that a moral critic was taking photos at "their" parade, even though it was a very public event.

When they finally confronted me directly, I protested that I had a right to be there and that this is still a free country (for the most part). The man, easily the more belligerent of the two, responded angrily: "Not for you; you're anti-gay." He repeated this absurdity several times, and then started obnoxiously reaching from behind me to block my camera lens with his hands, to keep me from chronicling the parade. Evidently, homosexual activists are not really *proud* of all that goes on at their sin celebrations.

Next, the man moved up to the rope line and pushed me out of my spot, where I had been standing for at least two hours. I told them I was there first but chose not to push back and fight for my spot as this budding "homo-fascist" was trying to make a spectacle of me in front of all the "gay" revelers; so I moved on to another spot along the parade route where I was able to take photos at a better angle.

Two quick thoughts about this petty "gay" bullying incident:

1) Had I engaged in the same thuggish behavior toward this homosexual activist — especially physically harassing him — he might have started screaming that I had "assaulted" him or cried "hate crime!" Lest you think I exaggerate, this happened to me once in Chicago several years ago: A young homosexual activist grabbed my protest sign out of my hands and ripped it up to rev up the "gay" crowd; when I confronted him, I made the mistake of touching him with my finger, whereupon he started yelling and screaming that I had touched him! Such are the glaring hypocrisy and tactics of intolerant homosexual activists. (The woman at New York "Pride," while carping that I was a "waste of space" because I dared to observe "pride," at least did not get physical with me.)

2) Homosexual activists are already crusading to take away people's right to act upon their disagreement with homosexuality — e.g., the Southern Poverty Law Center's successful lawsuit against "ex-gay" therapy group JONAH, and the legislative efforts to ban pro-heterosexual change therapy for minors. In their arrogance following the Supreme Court's discovery of a "constitutional right" for homosexuality-based "marriage," how many homosexual activists will start behaving as if their opponents lack the basic American right to act upon their moral opposition to sin-based "marriage"?


Poster Comment:

This is where WalMart spends the profits from its customers !(6 images)

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: noone222 (#0) (Edited)

When they finally confronted me directly, I protested that I had a right to be there and that this is still a free country (for the most part). The man, easily the more belligerent of the two, responded angrily: "Not for you; you're anti-gay."

Psalm 83

1Keep not thou silence, O God: hold not thy peace, and be not still, O God.

2For, lo, thine enemies make a tumult: and they that hate thee have lifted up the head.

3They have taken crafty counsel against thy people, and consulted against thy hidden ones. [ biblehub.com/colossians/3-3.htm

4They have said, Come, and let us cut them off from being a nation; that the name of Israel [CHRISTIAN biblehub.com/galatians/3-29.htm may be no more in remembrance.

12Who said, Let us take to ourselves the houses [pastures biblehub.com/ezekiel/34- 14.htm / http://biblehub.com/john/10-9.htm ] of God in possession.

biblehub.com/kjv/psalms/83.htm

Matthew Henry Commentary

83:1-8 Sometimes God seems not to be concerned at the unjust treatment of his people. But then we may call upon him, as the psalmist here. All wicked people are God's enemies, especially wicked persecutors. The Lord's people are his hidden one; the world knows them not. He takes them under his special protection. Do the enemies of the church act with one consent to destroy it, and shall not the friends of the church be united? Wicked men wish that there might be no religion among mankind. They would gladly see all its restraints shaken off, and all that preach, profess, or practise it, cut off. This they would bring to pass if it were in their power. The enemies of God's church have always been many: this magnifies the power of the Lord in preserving to himself a church in the world.

http://biblehub.com/psalms/83-4.htm

It was a pre-incarnate Jesus who destroyed Sodom and Gomorrah. I wonder how long He will allow them to defile His land:

[ www.wnd.com/2007/04/41327/print/ ].

Hebrews 10: 30For we know him that hath said, Vengeance belongeth unto me, I will recompense, saith the Lord. And again, The Lord shall judge his people. 31It is a fearful thing to fall into the hands of the living God.

biblehub.com/hebrews/10- 30.htm

------------------------------------------

Why Jew Judges Push Perversion

http://www.realjewnews.com/? p=972

"...as long as there..remain active enemies of the Christian church, we may hope to become Master of the World...the future Jewish King will never reign in the world before Christianity is overthrown - B'nai B'rith speech http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/luther.htm / http://bible.cc/psalms/83-4.htm

AllTheKings'HorsesWontDoIt  posted on  2017-07-27   13:30:49 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: noone222 (#0)

Napalm would have cleansed that street of the filth

 photo 001g.gif
“With the exception of Whites, the rule among the peoples of the world, whether residing in their homelands or settled in Western democracies, is ethnocentrism and moral particularism: they stick together and good means what is good for their ethnic group."
-Alex Kurtagic

X-15  posted on  2017-07-27   19:19:26 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: AllTheKings'HorsesWontDoIt (#1)

I am of the opinion that because some people have a queer friend or family member they condone it or at least tolerate it. Though I see that as a very difficult situation I also see it as a wedge issue for those calling themselves Christians when their guide book (Bible) clearly deems homosexuality an abomination to be dealt with severity.

Deviants are hateful towards a society that refuses to accept their abhorrent behavior. In my earlier years no one would have had the guts to recommend homos adopting children. This is insanity and an abuse of tolerance.

noone222  posted on  2017-07-28   5:43:12 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest