Freedom4um

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

9/11
See other 9/11 Articles

Title: The Truth behind 9/11: Who Is Osama Bin Laden?
Source: [None]
URL Source: https://www.globalresearch.ca/the-t ... -who-is-osama-bin-laden-2/3198
Published: Sep 11, 2017
Author: Prof Michel Chossudovsky
Post Date: 2017-09-11 06:49:03 by Ada
Keywords: None
Views: 131
Comments: 7

At 11am, on the morning of 9/11, the Bush administration had announced that Osama was behind the attacks.

The article below entitled Who is Osama bin Laden? was drafted on September 11, 2001. It was first published on the Global Research website on the evening of September 12, 2001.

Since 2001, it has appeared on numerous websites. The original September 11, 2001 posting became one of the most widely read articles on the internet, pertaining to Osama bin Laden and Al Qaeda. Since then it has been carefully “recategorized” by the Search engines. It no longer appears in the top pages of google.

The Global Research website was launched 16 years ago on the 9th of September 2001.

The original post of this article was among the first articles published by Global Research.

The original url was:

www.globalresearch.ca/articles/CHO109C.html

From the outset, the objective was to use 9/11 as a pretext for launching the first phase of the Middle East War, which consisted in the bombing and occupation of Afghanistan.

Within hours of the attacks, Osama bin Laden was identified as the architect of 9/11. On the following day, the “war on terrorism” had been launched. The media disinformation campaign went into full gear.

Also on September 12, less than 24 hours after the attacks, NATO invoked for the first time in its history “Article 5 of the Washington Treaty – its collective defence clause” declaring the 9/11 attacks on the World Trade Center (WTC) and the Pentagon “to be an attack against all NATO members.”

What happened subsequently, with the invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq is already part of history. Syria, Libya and Yemen were already on the Pentagon’s drawing board, the next phase of the US adminstration’s military roadmap.

9/11 remains the pretext and justification for waging a war without borders.

Click for Full Text!

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Ada (#0)

9/11 remains

The events of 9-11-2001 were an administrative coup d'état. George W. Bush was handed his head on a platter. ;)

"When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one." Edmund Burke

BTP Holdings  posted on  2017-09-11   7:34:36 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Ada (#0)

"It does not take a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brush fires of freedom in the minds of men." -- Samuel Adams (1722-1803)‡

"Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God." -- Thomas Jefferson

ghostdogtxn  posted on  2017-09-11   14:51:04 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: BTP Holdings (#1)

The events of 9-11-2001 were an administrative coup d'état. George W. Bush was handed his head on a platter. ;)

He went along with even if he wasn't in on the conspiracy. Being a "war time president" massaged his ego.

Ada  posted on  2017-09-12   18:06:24 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: ghostdogtxn (#2)

Even the Fibees couldn't conjure up enough evidence to get an indictment against OBL.

Ada  posted on  2017-09-12   18:08:00 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: Ada (#3)

W. was reading a book to those school children in Florida when they came in and told him the planes hit the Twin Towers. He should have excused himself, but he kept reading the book. The only problem with that was THE BOOK WAS UPSIDE DOWN! ;)

"When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one." Edmund Burke

BTP Holdings  posted on  2017-09-12   20:29:54 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: BTP Holdings (#5)

Bush 43 is not the sharpest. Might not have registered. I was walking down Church Street, i.e., right next to the WTC, when the first plane hit, and I thought it was an accident.

Would think the plotters would have wanted to give Bush plausible deniability. But I wouldn't swear he was not complicit.

Ada  posted on  2017-09-13   4:51:09 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: Ada (#6)

he was not complicit

Bush 43 had no idea what was going on. He was too dumb to realize the truth of the matter. Remember the events of that day were an administrative coup d'etat and W. was handed his head on a platter. ;)

"When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one." Edmund Burke

BTP Holdings  posted on  2017-09-14   9:02:49 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest