Status: Not Logged In; Sign In HistorySee other History ArticlesTitle: 1932 Buick Convertible Coupe Source: YouTube URL Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=peShDzHC3Do Published: Aug 27, 2012 Author: RIdesWithChuck Post Date: 2017-12-31 22:37:19 by X-15 Keywords: BuickViews: 695 Comments: 20 Something a little more genteel and elegant for your New Year's Eve viewing pleasure: Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top Page Up Full Thread Page Down Bottom/Latest Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 6. #1. To: X-15 (#0) According to dollartimes.com - $2,000.00 in 1932 had the same buying power as $33,072.88 in 2017 Lod posted on 2017-12-31 22:55:08 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply #4. To: Lod (#1) The current Buick Convertible, the Cascada, is $33,065. It's not nearly as luxurious and elegant as the 1932: www.buick.com/previous-year/cascada-luxury-convertible.html X-15 posted on 2017-12-31 23:12:23 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply #6. To: X-15 (#4) It's not nearly as luxurious and elegant as the 1932: To me, it's butt-ugly and stupid looking. Lod posted on 2017-12-31 23:47:10 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply Replies to Comment # 6. #8. To: Lod (#6) (Edited) The whole brand has kind of 'lost it's way', the TourX station-wagon and their SUV's are all they've got to offer, IMO. Even those fall short of the former glory of the Buick brand. X-15 posted on 2017-12-31 23:56:51 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply #11. To: Lod (#6) To me, it's butt-ugly and stupid looking. Well,you know what they say about taste..... Of course "they" lie a lot. sneakypete posted on 2018-01-01 02:25:16 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply End Trace Mode for Comment # 6. Top Page Up Full Thread Page Down Bottom/Latest
HistorySee other History Articles
Title: 1932 Buick Convertible Coupe Source: YouTube URL Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=peShDzHC3Do Published: Aug 27, 2012 Author: RIdesWithChuck Post Date: 2017-12-31 22:37:19 by X-15 Keywords: BuickViews: 695 Comments: 20
Something a little more genteel and elegant for your New Year's Eve viewing pleasure:
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 6.
#1. To: X-15 (#0) According to dollartimes.com - $2,000.00 in 1932 had the same buying power as $33,072.88 in 2017 Lod posted on 2017-12-31 22:55:08 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply #4. To: Lod (#1) The current Buick Convertible, the Cascada, is $33,065. It's not nearly as luxurious and elegant as the 1932: www.buick.com/previous-year/cascada-luxury-convertible.html X-15 posted on 2017-12-31 23:12:23 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply #6. To: X-15 (#4) It's not nearly as luxurious and elegant as the 1932: To me, it's butt-ugly and stupid looking. Lod posted on 2017-12-31 23:47:10 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply Replies to Comment # 6. #8. To: Lod (#6) (Edited) The whole brand has kind of 'lost it's way', the TourX station-wagon and their SUV's are all they've got to offer, IMO. Even those fall short of the former glory of the Buick brand. X-15 posted on 2017-12-31 23:56:51 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply #11. To: Lod (#6) To me, it's butt-ugly and stupid looking. Well,you know what they say about taste..... Of course "they" lie a lot. sneakypete posted on 2018-01-01 02:25:16 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply End Trace Mode for Comment # 6. Top Page Up Full Thread Page Down Bottom/Latest
According to dollartimes.com - $2,000.00 in 1932 had the same buying power as $33,072.88 in 2017
$2,000.00 in 1932 had the same buying power as $33,072.88 in 2017
Lod posted on 2017-12-31 22:55:08 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
The current Buick Convertible, the Cascada, is $33,065. It's not nearly as luxurious and elegant as the 1932: www.buick.com/previous-year/cascada-luxury-convertible.html
www.buick.com/previous-year/cascada-luxury-convertible.html
X-15 posted on 2017-12-31 23:12:23 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
It's not nearly as luxurious and elegant as the 1932: To me, it's butt-ugly and stupid looking.
It's not nearly as luxurious and elegant as the 1932:
To me, it's butt-ugly and stupid looking.
Lod posted on 2017-12-31 23:47:10 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#8. To: Lod (#6) (Edited) The whole brand has kind of 'lost it's way', the TourX station-wagon and their SUV's are all they've got to offer, IMO. Even those fall short of the former glory of the Buick brand. X-15 posted on 2017-12-31 23:56:51 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply #11. To: Lod (#6) To me, it's butt-ugly and stupid looking. Well,you know what they say about taste..... Of course "they" lie a lot. sneakypete posted on 2018-01-01 02:25:16 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply End Trace Mode for Comment # 6. Top Page Up Full Thread Page Down Bottom/Latest
The whole brand has kind of 'lost it's way', the TourX station-wagon and their SUV's are all they've got to offer, IMO. Even those fall short of the former glory of the Buick brand.
X-15 posted on 2017-12-31 23:56:51 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
To me, it's butt-ugly and stupid looking. Well,you know what they say about taste..... Of course "they" lie a lot.
Well,you know what they say about taste.....
Of course "they" lie a lot.
sneakypete posted on 2018-01-01 02:25:16 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
Top Page Up Full Thread Page Down Bottom/Latest