Freedom4um

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Ron Paul
See other Ron Paul Articles

Title: Rand Paul Could be Unexpected “No” Vote on Trump’s Supreme Court Pick
Source: [None]
URL Source: https://theintercept.com/2018/07/17 ... naugh-supreme-court-rand-paul/
Published: Jul 17, 2018
Author: Zaid Jilani, Alex Emmons
Post Date: 2018-07-17 09:24:23 by Ada
Keywords: None
Views: 63
Comments: 4

If Democrats unite and refuse to support Donald Trump’s Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh as a replacement for Justice Anthony Kennedy (a big if), he will need unanimous endorsement from Senate Republicans in order to be confirmed. But there’s a chance he won’t get it.

Although most Republican senators are expected to support Kavanaugh, political observers have flagged two pro-choice GOP senators — Maine’s Susan Collins and Alaska’s Lisa Murkowski — as possible defectors. After all, Trump campaigned on the promise that he would appoint a justice who would overturn Roe v. Wade, and there’s a possibility that Kavanaugh’s appointment could enable that result.

But there is another Republican senator whose vote might also be in play: Kentucky’s Rand Paul. Join Our Newsletter Original reporting. Fearless journalism. Delivered to you. I’m in

Following Edward Snowden’s 2013 revelation that the National Security Agency was collecting Americans’ phone records in bulk, the libertarian-conservative Paul was furious. He filed a class-action lawsuit against the Obama administration in 2014, saying in a press release that the spying constituted a “clear and continuing violation of the Fourth Amendment.”

But a concurrence Kavanaugh authored in 2015 suggests that he has a much more expansive view of the government’s ability to conduct warrantless searches than Paul. Writing about the same NSA activities that enraged Paul, Kavanaugh was clear: “In sum, the Fourth Amendment does not bar the Government’s bulk collection of telephony metadata under this program.”

Click for Full Text!

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Ada (#0)

I hope this nominee is not confirmed: he's no originalist.

We don't need another living-document mouth-breather.

“The most dangerous man to any government is the man who is able to think things out... without regard to the prevailing superstitions and taboos. Almost inevitably he comes to the conclusion that the government he lives under is dishonest, insane, intolerable.” ~ H. L. Mencken

Lod  posted on  2018-07-17   9:46:08 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Lod (#1)

We don't need Kennedy's clerk to succeed him. Raise our sights a bit to one of Scalia's or Thomas' clerks instead :-)

Ada  posted on  2018-07-17   12:38:19 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: Ada (#0)

Just another example that Trump lied and that he sold out to the establishment.

DWornock  posted on  2018-07-17   14:27:53 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: Ada (#2)

Amen.

“The most dangerous man to any government is the man who is able to think things out... without regard to the prevailing superstitions and taboos. Almost inevitably he comes to the conclusion that the government he lives under is dishonest, insane, intolerable.” ~ H. L. Mencken

Lod  posted on  2018-07-17   15:04:21 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest