Freedom4um

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

War, War, War
See other War, War, War Articles

Title: AngloZionist Attack Options Against Iran
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://www.unz.com/tsaker/anglozionist-attack-options-against-iran/
Published: Aug 5, 2018
Author: The Saker
Post Date: 2018-08-05 09:17:17 by Ada
Keywords: None
Views: 371
Comments: 13

In the past few days, the Internet has been flooded with a frankly silly rumor about the US soliciting Australia’s assistance in preparing an attack on Iran. Needless to say, that report does not explain what capabilities Australia would possess which the US would lack, but never-mind that. Still, the report was picked up in too many places (see here, here and here ) to be ignored. In one of these reports, Eric Margolis has described what such a US attack could look like. It is worth quoting him in full:

Outline of a possible AngloZionist attack on Iran

The US and Israel will surely avoid a massive, costly land campaign again Iran, a vast, mountainous nation that was willing to suffer a million battle casualties in its eight-year war with Iraq that started in 1980. This gruesome war was instigated by the US, Britain, Kuwait and Saudi Arabia to overthrow Iran’s new popular Islamic government.

The Pentagon has planned a high-intensity air war against Iran that Israel and the Saudis might very well join. The plan calls for over 2,300 air strikes against Iranian strategic targets: airfields and naval bases, arms and petroleum, oil and lubricant depots, telecommunication nodes, radar, factories, military headquarters, ports, waterworks, airports, missile bases and units of the Revolutionary Guards.

Iran’s air defenses range from feeble to non-existent. Decades of US-led military and commercial embargos against Iran have left it as decrepit and enfeebled as was Iraq when the US invaded in 2003. The gun barrels of Iran’s 70’s vintage tanks are warped and can’t shoot straight, its old British and Soviet AA missiles are mostly unusable, and its ancient MiG and Chinese fighters ready for the museum, notably its antique US-built F-14 Tomcats, Chinese copies of obsolete MiG-21’s, and a handful of barely working F-4 Phantoms of Vietnam War vintage.

Air combat command is no better. Everything electronic that Iran has will be fried or blown up in the first hours of a US attack. Iran’s little navy will be sunk in the opening attacks. Its oil industry may be destroyed or partially preserved depending on US post-war plans for Iran.

The only way Tehran can riposte is by staging isolated commando attacks on US installations in the Mideast of no decisive value, and, of course, blocking the narrow Strait of Hormuz that carries two-thirds of Mideast oil exports. The US Navy, based nearby in Bahrain, has been practicing for decades to combat this threat.

There is a lot of interesting material in this description and I think that it is worth looking into it segment by segment.

First, I can only agree with Margolis that neither the US nor Israel want a ground war against Iran: the country is too big, the Iranians too well prepared and the size of the force needed for such a campaign way beyond what the Empire can currently muster.

Second, Margolis is absolutely correct when he says that Iran does not have the means to stop a determined AngloZionist (missiles and aircraft) attack. Iran does have some modern air-defense capabilities, and the attackers will sustain a number of losses, but at this point, the size disparity is so huge that the AngloZionists will achieve air superiority fairly soon and that will give them an opportunity to bomb whatever they want to bomb (more about that later).

Click for Full Text!

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 2.

#2. To: Ada, BTP Holdings (#0) (Edited)

MISINFORMATION CENTRAL.

Iran has built their own version of the S-400 with Russian technology. They had been building their own S-300 and had bought the Chinese HQ-9 which combined the S-300 and the US Patriot missile with Israeli tech added on. They can use the HQ 9 to protect the S-400. Iran has a better anti-missile defense than does the US.

They have 2 different Mach 14 missiles which they are mass producing. The US does not have any missiles that fast.

Iran has air to air missiles with Mach 5.5 speed. US is 1 mach slower. Iran's missile has twice the range of its US counterpart.

The US would lose all US bases in Central Command out side Turkey which is becoming a Russian ally.The royals in Saudi Arabia would be toast along with their army. Yemen would be liberated.

The US cannot go to war against Iran. We would lose.

Horse  posted on  2018-08-05   13:47:19 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 2.

#4. To: Horse (#2)

The US cannot go to war against Iran. We would lose.

Short of nukes, you are 100% correct, imo.

Lod  posted on  2018-08-05 13:58:21 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: Horse (#2)

The US cannot go to war against Iran. We would lose.

Keeping to air bombardment, we and our faithful friends could turn Iran into another Iraq but most likely we would be hurt doing it.

Ada  posted on  2018-08-05 18:24:41 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 2.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest