Freedom4um

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

War, War, War
See other War, War, War Articles

Title: Alex Jones' Warning To The World On Internet Censorship
Source: Nathan Hale
URL Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zny1sFAprVA
Published: Aug 7, 2018
Author: Alex Jones
Post Date: 2018-08-07 04:07:39 by hondo68
Keywords: ChiComs, Saudi-Israel, Dancing Wahhabis, NWO, Javanka, ISIS, CIA, Mossad, Fake News
Views: 390
Comments: 22

Monday, August 6th, 2018.

Youtube, Facebook, Apple, Spotify & Pinterest ban Alex Jones/Infowars.

Youtube bans Alex Jones Channel. Internet censorship of free speech.

Spares...


Poster Comment:

D&R party Fake News overload? They hope that you're confused enough to vote for the Democrat&Republican Party again.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 14.

#3. To: hondo68 (#0) (Edited)

Latest Qanon Posts 8-7-18 : Fake News - YouTube 17.25 minutes. Link set to start at 9:23 for a 35 second segment to 9:58 on H.R. 5181 Countering Foreign Propaganda and Disinformation Act of 2016. + 4um Ref. with more on that @ Title: The Citizen's Audit (NDAA 2017- Global Engagement Center [Note: Senators Portman and Murphy who authored the H.R. 5181 legislation also traveled to Ukraine with Senator McCain to advance the undemocratic and entirely illegal overthrow of Ukraine's valid President by insurrectionists.]

Reported here with a bit more info but the NDAA 2017 legislation title is incorrectly cited as NDAA 2016 due to some confusion over the December 2016 date that it was passed for Fiscal Year 2017. Link set to start at 1:11 for a 3.25 minute segment to 4:34 on that subject + influence issue of rigged, pre-midterm elections theft by selective political-censorship to empower Globalist "Establishment" controllers: QAnon 8.7.18 HR [1581 5181] Stuffed Inside The [NDAA] Clowns To The Left & Jokers To The Right - YouTube, 10.75 minutes

Example of more politically-weaponized Communications-jamming, with global impact:

THE EU IS ABOUT TO BAN MEMES - YouTube, 5.57 minutes

Published on Jun 18, 2018 by Paul Joseph Watson

And destroy the Internet as we know it.

SAVE YOUR INTERNET - DELETE [EU] ARTICLE 13: https://saveyourinternet.eu/act- now/

GreyLmist  posted on  2018-08-08   4:21:19 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: GreyLmist (#3)

And destroy the Internet as we know it.

The internet was destroyed when the U.S. lost control of ICANN in 2016. ;)

www.businessinsider.com/t...er-controls-the-internet-2016-10

BTP Holdings  posted on  2018-08-08   5:35:30 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: BTP Holdings (#4) (Edited)

The internet was destroyed when the U.S. lost control of ICANN in 2016. ;)

www.businessinsider.com/t...er-controls-the-internet-2016-10


A hyphen in your posted link path got misplaced at the end, so it only displays a 404 message of no route found for this article on the ICANN topic:

The U.S. government no longer controls the internet - Business Insider, Oct. 4, 2016 [with a 1 minute YouTube included there]

Excerpts:

Saturday, October 1, marked a historic day for the internet. The U.S. government finally handed over control of the world wide web's "phonebook" to the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) after almost 20 years of transition. The ICANN, a nonprofit organization composed of stakeholders from government organizations, members of private companies, and internet users from all over the world, now has direct control over the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA), the body that manages the web's domain name system (DNS).

Prior to the handover, ICANN already managed IANA, but the U.S. Department of Commerce, through the U.S. National Telecommunications & Information Administration (NTIA), had ultimate authority over any decisions that ICANN made. This meant that the U.S. government could overrule any resolution made by the latter.

In a press release, ICANN Board Chair Stephen D. Crocker said, "This transition was envisioned 18 years ago, yet it was the tireless work of the global Internet community, which drafted the final proposal, that made this a reality. This community validated the multistakeholder model of Internet governance. ...

The move has heavy political implications since the internet's registry system is no longer under U.S. government control.


More about ICANN here:

It’s ALL Been Given Away To Foreign Powers and One Senator Spills The Beans… [Ted Cruz, R-TX] - YouTube, 10 minutes

Published on Aug 14, 2018 by Lisa Haven

[@ 6:49 re: "Censorship that's already happening here." ... Sen. Cruz during a 2016 Congressional address: "Leading technology companies in the United States (Facebook, YouTube, Twitter and Microsoft) reached an agreement with the European Union to remove, quote 'Hate Speech' from their online platforms withing 24 hours -- giant corporations signing on with the government saying, 'We are going to help you censor speech.'"

Video Notes: ICANN/Internet Corporation of Assigned Names and Numbers; UN-like control of internet domain names given to an international organization that includes 162 foreign countries, to be able to censor speech on the internet; @ 2:10 ref. Washington Times article: "Obama gives away the internet and, with it, our liberty", September 13, 2016. From 3 comments there:

"Each country built its own section of what would become the internet entirely independent from each other. And the thing that tied all those disparate networks together into a single World Wide Web, well, that was the Hyper Text Transfer Protocol (which) was developed at CERN located in Switzerland, operated by the combined nations of Europe -- not the United States. In fact, most things of the internet, have been decided on by international organizations made up of people whose goal it was to connect the world." ... "'International Organizations'. They cant even run Football (soccer) or the Olympics without corruption and systemic failures." ... "I could not pump gas the other day because the station's internet service was down. Everything including banking, mail, health care relies on the internet. What are they doing? This is about one world government. Look at the speech Obama just gave to the U.N."]

From the YouTube comments:

"this was [a] major issue that was barely covered except for a few Youtube channels."

"Info Wars warned about this as well. Not a conspiracy theory."

"How can Obama do that without congressional approval being that it effects the public, or did congress sponsor the bill?"

GreyLmist  posted on  2018-08-19   5:43:51 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: GreyLmist (#6)

Bill Maher Blasts Liberals over Alex Jones Censorship: ‘Supposed to Be for Free Speech’


Essentially The Donald wants to force Zuckerberg to bake gay wedding cakes, or whatever HUD orders. This truly is fascism, where the government mandates how you must run your business.

Business doesn't have to serve anyone, they have the right to tell anyone to F' off! Even Trump snowflakes.

Trump admin files formal complaint against Facebook for 'discriminatory' policy


Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg testifies before
a joint hearing of the Commerce and Judiciary Committees on Capitol Hill in
Washington, Tuesday, April 10, 2018, about the use of Facebook data to target
American voters in the 2016 election. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon)
Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg testifies before a joint hearing of the Commerce and Judiciary Committees on Capitol Hill in Washington, Tuesday, April 10, 2018, about the use of Facebook data to target American voters in the 2016 election. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon)

The Trump administration announced a fair housing discrimination complaint against social media giant Facebook on Friday, saying the way the company targets ads can be used to screen out people based on race, sex or other protected categories.

The complaint goes to the heart of Facebook’s business model, which depends on being able to offer advertisers micro-targeting.

Facebook mines extensive user data and classifies its users based on protected characteristics. Facebook’s ad targeting tools then invite advertisers to express unlawful preferences by suggesting discriminatory options,” the Housing and Urban Development Department said in the complaint.

Among those options are physical disabilities, parents with children and even religious practices — advertisers are allowed to show their ads only to people Facebook deems interested in “Jesus” or the “Christian Church,” for example.

Those practices could violate the Civil Rights Act, HUD said in the complaint, dated August 13.

The government had begun an investigation in 2016 after learning that Facebook allowed people running ads to narrow down those who can see their advertising based on protected categories.

Facebook didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment, but has previously said its policies tell advertisers not to discriminate. The company also insisted it had safeguards to stop advertisers from selecting based on race or ethnicity.

hondo68  posted on  2018-08-19   8:07:43 ET  (1 image) Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: hondo68 (#7) (Edited)

Bill Maher Blasts Liberals over Alex Jones Censorship: ‘Supposed to Be for Free Speech’ [Note: Example of YouTube platforming even his noise-pollution vulgarism as Leftist-protected "Free Speech"]

Essentially The Donald wants to force Zuckerberg to bake gay wedding cakes, or whatever HUD orders. This truly is fascism, where the government mandates how you must run your business.

Business doesn't have to serve anyone, they have the right to tell anyone to F' off! Even Trump snowflakes.

Trump admin files formal complaint against Facebook for 'discriminatory' policy [washingtontimes.com article]

Excerpts:

“Facebook mines extensive user data and classifies its users based on protected characteristics. ... Those practices could violate the Civil Rights Act, HUD said in the complaint, dated August 13. ... The government had begun an investigation in 2016 after learning that Facebook allowed people running ads to narrow down those who can see their advertising based on protected categories.


Some comments at the article:

"As the leftist do their normal ranting and screaming of 'Trump!!!!!', would one of them care to tell me who was president in 2016 again?" [Hint: not Trump]

"Are you saying it is OK that Obama was investigating FB for the same thing, but it is bad when Trump does?"


Unless you'd like to answer those 2 questions for us, I'm gonna have to vote "No" on changing the topic to "Trump, HUD and the Waivering-Left's Gifting of Privileged Immunity from the Civil Rights Act for the Technocracy." Meanwhile, this is a quick reminder of the various legal issues I'd rather be discussed:

YouTube @ 6:49 re: "Censorship that's already happening here." ... Sen. Cruz during a 2016 Congressional address: "Leading technology companies in the United States (Facebook, YouTube, Twitter and Microsoft) reached an agreement with the European Union to remove, quote 'Hate Speech' from their online platforms withing within 24 hours -- giant U.S. corporations signing on with the government saying, 'We are going to help you censor speech.'"

GreyLmist  posted on  2018-08-20   0:34:00 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: GreyLmist, HUD Social Justice Wariors, Obama and Trump triggered (#9) (Edited)

You're right Trump is as bad as Obama, it's still going on. Brotherhood of the Offended Snowflake. Hillary could have continued this politically correct SJW crap too.

hondo68  posted on  2018-08-20   0:45:03 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: hondo68, GreyLmist, 4 (#10)

Hillary could have continued this politically correct SJW crap too.

The PIAPS would have doubled, or tripled-down on the pc censorship.

Lod  posted on  2018-08-20   7:26:43 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: Lod, hondo68, 4 (#11) (Edited)

Excerpts from the Washington Times article: “Facebook mines extensive user data and classifies its users based on protected characteristics. ... Those practices could violate the Civil Rights Act, HUD said in the complaint, dated August 13. ... The government had begun an investigation in 2016 after learning that Facebook allowed people running ads to narrow down those who can see their advertising based on protected categories.

hondo68: ... "Trump is as bad as Obama, it's still going on. Brotherhood of the Offended Snowflake. Hillary could have continued this politically correct SJW crap too."

Lod: "The PIAPS would have doubled, or tripled-down on the pc censorship."


Oddly enough, a websearch of the PIAPS acronym returned with something of more definitive relevance (possibly) to the selective-censorship detour here re: the HUD controversy, other than her wardrobe of Pants Suits:

PIAPs: Public Internet Access Points (PIAPs) and Their Social Impact

Excerpts from 2 study-Abstracts about the nations of Turkey and Australia @ tandfonline.com:

Behaviour & Information Technology

Building public Internet access points (PIAPs) is a significant contribution of governments towards achieving an information society. While many developing countries are investing great amounts to establish PIAPs today, people may not use PIAPs effectively. Yet, the successful implementation of PIAPs is the result of citizens' acceptance to use this opportunity.

There is increasing evidence that the lack of access to information and communication technology (ICT) or the ‘digital divide’ severely limits education, employment and economic prospects. This paper reports on the evaluation of a project that aims to bridge the digital divide.

Being a part of the digital divide in the twentieth century disconnects you from a part of your world that now exists for others.

GreyLmist  posted on  2018-08-20   14:00:20 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: GreyLmist (#12)

At least slang.org still has the original meaning. Seems as though someone's been scrubbing the web.

Lod  posted on  2018-08-20   14:26:36 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: Lod (#13)

I had a hell of a time remembering what the first P was, but I figured it out after an hour or so. Sucks to be old and banged up. Might've been better off if "Texting Woman" would have killed me when she hit me.

Esso  posted on  2018-08-20   16:12:53 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 14.

#15. To: Esso (#14)

Might've been better off if "Texting Woman" would have killed me when she hit me.

When I was a kid my Mom broke a dinner plate on my head. I don't recall what happened that she did that, but it must have been something nasty. My sister said it scared her. Mom was the disciplinarian in the house since the old man was a drunk. ;)

BTP Holdings  posted on  2018-08-20 16:24:07 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 14.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest