In a unanimous ruling that is expected to curb attempts by local and state governments to increase their revenue by seizing private property using excessive, arbitrary asset forfeiture laws, a unanimous U.S. Supreme Court has ruled in Timbs v. State of Indiana that state governments must abide by the Eighth Amendments prohibition on the imposition of excessive fines for criminal offenses.
Attorneys for The Rutherford Institute had filed an amicus brief in Timbs, challenging the power of states to engage in abusive policing for profit tactics and asking that SCOTUS overturn a ruling by the Indiana Supreme Court, which found that the Eighth Amendment did not prohibit the state from seizing a vehicle worth $42,000 as a penalty for selling four grams of heroin. Lower courts had found the seizure to be grossly disproportionate to the offense. Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg wrote the opinion for the Court.