Freedom4um

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Health
See other Health Articles

Title: If You Are Taking A Statin Drug Read This!
Source: [None]
URL Source: https://criticalhealthnews.com/heal ... m=email&utm_source=getresponse
Published: Apr 20, 2019
Author: Ben Fuchs
Post Date: 2019-04-20 04:43:31 by Tatarewicz
Keywords: None
Views: 115
Comments: 2

CHN...

One out of every 4 adults over the age of 45 is on a statin drug. And for the rest of their lives. Despite the fact that there are hundreds of studies demonstrating their toxicity and relationship to most serious health issues ranging from muscle pain to brain and memory problems. Statin drugs have even been linked to diabetes and cancer, two of the top three leading causes of death. The FDA has issued numerous warnings to Doctors, but the sale$ continue to rise. All the while they get rich and you just get sicker and sicker. But there is always another drug for the new sick you will develop. These drugs are very dangerous.

Cholesterol control is best thought of as sugar control. There’s a reason why diabetes and elevated blood cholesterol go hand in hand. Most concerning about diabetes is that the designation of it (or the determination of it) is arbitrary. Whether or not you’re officially considered a diabetic is arbitrarily determined by the magic of the medical model and the black magicians who come up with so-called diagnostic standards.

According to the American Diabetes Association, there are three main tests that determine whether or not you’re a diabetic.

The A1C test measures blood glucose as an average over the course 2 to 3 months. You’re considered a diabetic if you’re A1C score is greater than 6.5%.

The Fasting Blood Glucose test is the second test doctors use to assess diabetes. As the name implies, you have to fast for at least 8 hours before this test, and you’re considered a diabetic if your blood glucose is over 126 mg per dl of blood (which works out to about a teaspoonful of glucose for the entire gallon or so of blood that circulates in the average human body).

The third test is called the Oral Glucose Tolerance Test, and that measures blood sugar before and after you drink a super sweet glucose drink. If your blood sugar is over 200 after you take an oral glucose tolerance test, the doctor will pronounce you officially a diabetic.

The problem with these tests is no one really knows just exactly what a healthy or appropriate blood sugar should be. All of these numbers and determinations are based on bell curves, reference values, and statistics. Human beings are individuals. To take care of our health, we have to recognize our specific, individual biochemical nature. To superimpose statistics and bell curves on top of individuals is BAD SCIENCE.

Does it make sense to anyone that if your fasting blood sugar is recorded as 125 mg per dl, you are non-diabetic, but if you’re at 126, all of a sudden you have a disease? If you're at 125, you can go about your business as usual because you're healthy. No, our blood sugar is still way too high, and just because the medical model hasn’t officially pronounced us diseased, our sugar chemistry is definitely wacked, and we are most assuredly not healthy.

Pretty much all adults (or at least those who are subsisting on the SAD) can assume that blood sugar control is not good. Dysglycemia is part and parcel of our modern lifestyle and of the aging process. A sure sign that your blood sugar is starting to get thrown off is a pot belly. Do you know ANYONE who doesn’t have a little pooch going on? How many people are able to say their gut is the same size when they’re 40 as when they are 20? High blood pressure is another dysglycemic red flag and, most assuredly, so is elevated blood fats and cholesterol.

Think cholesterol and blood fats, think blood sugar. The best way to lower your cholesterol naturally is to lower blood sugar by eating less food that spikes blood sugar and by eating less food in general. Dysglycemia is a food and eating health issue; it’s not a drug issue. Because elevated blood cholesterol is about dysglycemia, if you want to lower your blood cholesterol, change the way you eat: more protein and less sugar. And EAT MORE FAT, and EAT MORE CHOLESTEROL!! (I know this is contrary to all the conventional nonsense that you hear from mainstream lobbyist groups, but they care more about your money than your health.) Organizations (really, big business corporations) like the American Heart Association and the American Diabetes Association have presided over the biggest increases in heart disease and diabetes IN THE HISTORY OF MANKIND. When, in fact, the more cholesterol you eat, the less cholesterol your body makes! In other words, cholesterol-containing foods are nature’s non-toxic, healthy statin drugs. Tell that to the next boneheaded medical doctor who warns that you better start taking a toxin that poisons the liver cells so they can’t produce this incredibly important biomolecule!

In addition to consuming cholesterol, using sugar-metabolizing supplements can help. The Chromium and Vanadium in the product Sweet EZE™ can help lower blood sugar and can lower blood cholesterol. The Sweet EZE™ is like a natural statin drug without the drug toxicity. The B-vitamins are incredibly important for blood sugar metabolism. Beyond Tangy Tangerine is loaded with the B-vitamins. If you’re a diabetic (and remember we all are to some extent), you would be very wise to use some BTT after all sweets as well as starchy meals (bread, pasta, potatoes, etc.) Thiamine is especially important for lowering blood sugar.

Niacin is one of the most critical of all nutrients for helping the body process sugar, and not coincidentally. Niacin is one of the most important nutrients for the liver, and is just as effective at lowering cholesterol as statin drugs. You’ll get a good dose of niacin in the Beyond Tangy Tangerine, but if you’re seriously concerned about elevated blood cholesterol, you might want to add in a 100mg daily dose of time-release niacin too.


Poster Comment:

Quacks likely prescribe a statin for cholesterol control because it's an easier way to earn a fee from insurance than getting patients to control it through diet, and at a buck a pill those with a pharmacy inside their clinic it's another fast buck. I brought my cholesterol down to within limits by going easy on cheese, etc.; still have the 100 pills a clinic pharmacist snuck on me.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Tatarewicz (#0)

Quacks likely prescribe a statin for cholesterol control because it's an easier way to earn a fee from insurance than getting patients to control it through diet, and at a buck a pill those with a pharmacy inside their clinic it's another fast buck.

Wrong!

Drs prescribe statins because they are trained and retrained to do so. There are very high risk patients for which they can help, but they are definitely overprescribed and their side effects underappreciated At one point in the 90's drug companies were campaigning with state legislatures to get statins in the water supply.

Physicians and other practitioners are trained in the benefits of pharmaceutical products and expected to use them. As most doctors are now employed, not using statins could get a doctor called up before a quality assurance board and terminated. Patients want statins, it's "easier" than lifestyle changes. Same with diabetics.

A physician cannot get kickbacks from a pharmacy within their clinic, it's an outright Stark violation and most do not own the clinic they work in anyway. Over 80% of MDs are employed. For us older doctors, it took a long time to lift our heads out of the matrix.

The use of the word quack is very demeaning. It takes at least 11 years of hard study after high school to be a doctor. I have 15years. A quest for money and quackdom is not enough to survive those years, most want to truly be healers. However, almost every occupation in this modern world ends up being subverted by monetary drives and medicine is no exception.

octavia  posted on  2019-04-20   14:59:30 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: octavia (#1)

Appreciate your correction/clarification but like other parts of society there's always a few goofups/frauds.

My cynicism was prompted by medical mistreatment of a friend, knocked unconscious in a hit and run. Two months in hospital, which she considered too long but when she "discharged" herself, city hospital had police bring her back handcuffed; discharged shortly after and on no further medication.

Three months at home, very close to her normal self, amicable as usual but tiring easily upon hard mental or physical work; until one morning hears and sees evidence of someone using her attic as hideout. Calls police who arrive hours later, find no one, take her to hospital as delusional.

She's now really confused, vigorously protests but hospital, instead of saying will you pipe down if we send you home; check with us tomorrow, they put her in a lock-up ward. Transferred to nursing home where to "calm" her Doc administers the deadly, anti-psychotic risperidone pill which after she spits out is administered monthly by injection, despite her having a dozen side effects, including "confusion."

Docs give friend a couple of "capability" tests while she's doped up and which she fails. What a surprise!

Can't be anything crazier than treating someone clamoring to go home with a dangerous drug like risperidone which is subject to hundreds of lawsuits in US.

During two-month hospitalization police left back door open so neighbor and I could feed dog. Stuff stolen from house, hasp of garage sheared off. So I don't know if police had her committed to preclude hassles over leaving a house unsecured or if the constable was just ticked off about missing a bull session at Tim Hortons

Had medics sent this senior home initially they wouldn't be able to bill Health Services for consultations and prescriptions; empty hospital beds could lead to loss of thousands, might be staff layoffs. Alberta's socialist government was emphasizing its employment record during time when refugees were immigrating in; more coloreds in nursing homes than at WalMart's. To avoid sales tax or medical premiums government has Public Trustee seize bank accounts and property of middle class folks like my friend to pay for food and apartment in nursing home; can't tax the rich because their money is needed for building factories, etc. Most painful emotional moment of my life having friend scream at me to stop Trustee representative from ransacking her house.

Details at Google Groups Alberta Politics:

groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/alberta-politics

Only way I can see this kind of travesty can be minimized in "free" health system is to pay medics a fixed annual sum, plus expenses, in the various categories so that there's no longer an incentives to push pills or engage in other invasive measures. Medics would have much more time to compile patient reports for future research. Also, when doctors prescribe a statin or whatever they give patient the option of a prescription and diet/lifestyle change, with a printed summary, including a reference to chat rooms like Patient. It's the only way we'll get health care costs under control and have a healthier population.

Tatarewicz  posted on  2019-04-23   7:29:20 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest