Freedom4um

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Neocon Nuttery
See other Neocon Nuttery Articles

Title: Tulsi Gabbard Speaks to Right-Wing Christians United for Israel Conference
Source: YT
URL Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PxXcUNct18Q&feature=youtu.be
Published: Oct 23, 2015
Author: CUFI
Post Date: 2019-10-23 00:44:50 by X-15
Ping List: *The hook-nosed Jew*     Subscribe to *The hook-nosed Jew*
Keywords: Israel, neocon
Views: 732
Comments: 36

Excerpt from original


Poster Comment:

Yeah, Tulsi Gabbard is really independent....sure.Subscribe to *The hook-nosed Jew*

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 26.

#1. To: X-15 (#0)

Great find! I'd love to know if anybody here is still admiring her. Yes, she's speaking some long-overdue truths and that's great, but if only as the latest route to cucking the white goyim....?

If she's against these wars, will she be repudiating her own military activity and declining all benefits appertaining thereunto?....

NeoconsNailed  posted on  2019-10-23   4:26:52 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: NeoconsNailed, X-15 (#1)

She denounces the US goverment's "regime change" wars, but proudly touts her tour in the war that the US waged in Iraq to overthrow Saddam Hussein's regime. In Kuwait she "served" as a military cop training the Kuwaiti military to do God knows what. She wants to disarm White people and leave us to the tender mercies of armed government workers and violent dusky felons, both native and among the millions of the illegal alien immigrants whom she welcomes. She champions LBGTQXYZ issues and laments her erstwhile opposition to it. She wants the government to rend substance from the haves -- at gunpoint if necessary, as governments always do -- and give it to those who did not earn it. She is slightly to the right of the average Democrat, which makes her only slightly to the left of Karl Marx. She's famous at the moment only because she professes to be anti-war and because she's considerably less ugly than Pocahontas and PIAPS.

StraitGate  posted on  2019-10-23   22:04:25 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: StraitGate (#3)

LOL, SPEAK it! "The haves" -- these demoniacs' highest thought is to keep LBJ's "Great Society" going even though it was a total disaster from the word go.

Thanks for sawing her head off so eloquently. Hope she catches some ghastly slow-acting fatal disease soon.

NeoconsNailed  posted on  2019-10-23   22:18:58 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: NeoconsNailed (#4)

"The haves"

Alexis de Tocqueville spoke of 'legal plunder" in his tome Democracy in America.

This happens when the government takes a portion of what you have and gives it to some that does not have it. ;)

BTP Holdings  posted on  2020-08-31   9:03:31 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: BTP Holdings (#5)

LBJ actually stood there on TV and announced "we are going to take from the 'haves' and give to the 'have nots'" -- outright communism! It's no coincidence that he's the same bustard who said to recall the forces sent to save the US Liberty because "we are not going to embarrass My friends", the Israelis!

The 60s were an outwardly heady, prosperous time to grow up, but with this national suicide going on? Little Rock was just another day for our 'Greatest Generation' parents. I hated having blackids in school, and they were pretty much uniformly nasty.

NeoconsNailed  posted on  2020-08-31   14:41:37 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: NeoconsNailed (#7)

You must have gone to school somewhere up north.

Lod  posted on  2020-08-31   15:22:47 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: Lod (#8)

How can you tell?

NeoconsNailed  posted on  2020-08-31   17:35:34 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#20. To: NeoconsNailed (#14)

How can you tell?

Because in the segregated South, before the full effects of the Great Society were felt, blacks had their side of town and whites had theirs, and there was little to no racial interaction much less animosity.

Lod  posted on  2020-08-31   21:23:09 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#26. To: Lod, Neonutnailed (#20)

How can you tell?

Because in the segregated South, before the full effects of the Great Society were felt, blacks had their side of town and whites had theirs, and there was little to no racial interaction much less animosity.

Born and raised in Indiana (Indianapolis) a "Northern" state (so they say), I saw more racism and actual riots there than I have ever seen in the South. Another thing that is being left unattended is the racism that exists within the minority communities towards Caucasian people.

Simply put, Blacks as a generalized group have had difficulty adjusting to civilized social norms and haven't been helped by government injecting free money, housing, medical, and much more including affirmative action. Even though they've (Blacks) taken longer to assimilate more time is necessary because there has been a notable and definite increase in the number of Black people advancing themselves and operating their lives responsibly and contributing to society as they should.

Those Blacks that continue to act irresponsibly or more importantly criminally are in dire need of some tough love. Don't do the crime bro, if you can't do the time, especially with regard to violent crime. When the public officials allow these riots and the painting of BLM on the streets instead of locking these criminals up only increases the demands and bitching by a class of individuals that "got nothing coming" and should be in jail.

It appears to me that those having the qualities and character to assimilate peaceably into society regardless of race are also provided with equal opportunities to succeed, any many do so. I'd suggest to those that still feel it is a racist country be given plane fare to any country that will have them and give them some start up cash to leave. (and leave they must).

When Obama said "you didn't build this" he surely had these disgruntled (BLM) Blacks and their comrades in mind (ha !). Now Obama's party is applauding people that are destroying cities and businesses that they have had no part in building.

I have spent enough time in both the North and the South to have an opinion based upon experience. I have found the South to be willing to rethink their prior position related to race issues and adjust to a position that makes for a peaceful solution. (I might exclude large metro areas where the larger minority population place their candidates into office that are usually democrats inclined to cater to other minorities and eventually bankrupt the city).

I have also witnessed a reluctance to adjust in the North, however I'd admit that the overall improvement to race relations in both the North and South must be acknowledged by all of us, and the balance of differences or inequitable conditions felt by everyone should be discussed and debated peacefully. (I'm sure there are taxpayers out there that feel they've been forced to support many issues that they are opposed to and one of those might be welfare for unwed moms (many on drugs) and their dependent children).

I find it ironic that these days the protesting groups are clamoring for segregation. These same groups were demanding integration 50 - 60 years ago. In view of the fact that we've tried both and integration hasn't worked, we might be better off segregated and absolutely self reliant.

It's also worth mentioning here that when I lived in Indianapolis, my mom would drive over to a Black section of town to get BB-Q from a Black merchant BECAUSE IT WAS THE BEST PRODUCT. She never had a problem and she said there were always other White people there too. This would have been in the 60s. My mom also loved Fats Domino (I did too).

At any rate, trying to tie the current events around the country to racism is just pure nonsense. It is a well funded, well organized attempt to destabilize America by Marxists that should be destroyed.

No matter what decisions are made by the authorities things will proceed until a climax is obtained by the Marxists or the Patriots. It could easily become a full on civil war. That would be sad after achieving so much towards civility and equality between races only to have the few that can never be satisfied by any amount of reasonable alterations or changed conditions take us back to a time when men (and families) couldn't have a decent life.

noone222  posted on  2020-09-01   8:52:38 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 26.

#28. To: noone222 (#26)

It's a mess strait from hell now, and 100% exclusively, only, infamously so because of tactical jew maneuvers to gain absolute control over all concerned. What these black power mobs want is whatever's not on the menu at a given moment -- deseg, segregation, equality, supremacy, but consistently they want civilization GONE. Too embarrassing for savages!

Pitiful remnant of a great newsletter and courageous editrix:

galene.csd.net/pipermail/rushtalk/2000- July/030184.html

NeoconsNailed  posted on  2020-09-01 09:41:51 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#30. To: noone222 (#26)

I find it ironic that these days the protesting groups are clamoring for segregation. These same groups were demanding integration 50 - 60 years ago. In view of the fact that we've tried both and integration hasn't worked, we might be better off segregated and absolutely self reliant.

To me, that's the key to your excellent essay. Thank you.

Lod  posted on  2020-09-01 12:25:56 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 26.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest