Freedom4um

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

All is Vanity
See other All is Vanity Articles

Title: Should Christians Be Subservient To This Government?
Source: Romans 13
URL Source: http://www.blueletterbible.org/kjv/Rom/Rom013.html#1
Published: Jul 2, 2006
Author: christian bible
Post Date: 2006-07-02 20:11:00 by Red Jones
Keywords: None
Views: 6492
Comments: 117

Romans 13:1 Let every soul be subject unto the higher powers. For there is no power but of God: the powers that be are ordained of God.

Romans 13:2 Whosoever therefore resisteth the power, resisteth the ordinance of God: and they that resist shall receive to themselves damnation.

Romans 13:3 For rulers are not a terror to good works, but to the evil. Wilt thou then not be afraid of the power? do that which is good, and thou shalt have praise of the same:

Romans 13:4 For he is the minister of God to thee for good. But if thou do that which is evil, be afraid; for he beareth not the sword in vain: for he is the minister of God, a revenger to [execute] wrath upon him that doeth evil.

Romans 13:5 Wherefore [ye] must needs be subject, not only for wrath, but also for conscience sake.

Romans 13:6 For for this cause pay ye tribute also: for they are God's ministers, attending continually upon this very thing.

Romans 13:7 Render therefore to all their dues: tribute to whom tribute [is due]; custom to whom custom; fear to whom fear; honour to whom honour.

Romans 13:8 Owe no man any thing, but to love one another: for he that loveth another hath fulfilled the law.

Romans 13:9 For this, Thou shalt not commit adultery, Thou shalt not kill, Thou shalt not steal, Thou shalt not bear false witness, Thou shalt not covet; and if [there be] any other commandment, it is briefly comprehended in this saying, namely, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself.

Romans 13:10 Love worketh no ill to his neighbour: therefore love [is] the fulfilling of the law.

Romans 13:11 And that, knowing the time, that now [it is] high time to awake out of sleep: for now [is] our salvation nearer than when we believed.

Romans 13:12 The night is far spent, the day is at hand: let us therefore cast off the works of darkness, and let us put on the armour of light.

Romans 13:13 Let us walk honestly, as in the day; not in rioting and drunkenness, not in chambering and wantonness, not in strife and envying.

Romans 13:14 But put ye on the Lord Jesus Christ, and make not provision for the flesh, to [fulfil] the lusts [thereof].


a very provocative question in the title. I hope people will not be offended by it.

I have read some people's views here who criticize christians and say that the christians are overly-submissive to government's fascism.

I think there is a fine line, but a very important distinction still, between submitting to government's legitimate authority and supporting them in their evil. I try to do the former, but not the later.

I think we should be aware of the evil, but not supportive of it. Nevertheless, I personally feel we should take Romans 13 and similar verses seriously and submit to the authority that is put over us. I remember the story in the early chapters of Daniel when the Babylonians took over Jerusalem. Daniel submitted to their authority. but he told his friends that they would secretly keep the old rituals up even though the new king told them not to do this. He did not outwardly rebel, he did not raise up rebels. He only secretly obtained the things he needed and carried out the old rituals behind-closed-doors. And when the king came and told him to openly worship the new god he simply told the king that he would not do this. When the king told him he'd have him thrown in a furnace for defiance, then Daniel told the king that he would submit to this and that if this happened then his god was powerful enough to protect him from the furnace if he so chose to do so. Then the king threw him and his friends in the furnace. Then Daniel and his friends did not burn. Then the king ordered the court's accusers of Daniel to be thrown in the furnace instead. And he appointed Daniel to a high position knowing full well that he refused to worship the new god. And the king even paid respect to Daniel's god. To me Daniel was the model we should follow. He submitted to the legitimate authority of those over him here on earth. But he always worshiped god and not the king's false god. He was respectful of the authorities and did nothing to cause a rebellion. but he prevailed anyway with the help of god. To me Daniel is our model for today.

What say ye?

I think that the 'fallen-away' phenomenon is very real - that a large portion of the organized church has a faith that is against god, and yet they masquerade. And I think the 'deceived' factor is very strong. In these end-times many have beendeceived by the enemy. It is good not to be fallen-away. and it is good not to be deceived. but we still must at least submit to the authorities over us.

I keep telling people we are not going to defeat them. Until jesus returns. we should remember that the meek shall inherit the earth. The kingdom of heaven will come. The evil ones will be punished. Revenge is not ours', it is his. the sheep will be separated from the goats.

we must build our faith and do good works, look what it says in verse 3, the evil rulers cannot stop you when you do these good works. The things of man are being discredited in a powerful way. We cannot stop these events. we should be humble over them instead.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Red Jones (#0)

What say ye?

I say that this is one of the best, the most salient posts that I've ever read on this topic.

Thanks for this thought provoking article and commentary.

...to be in this world, but not of this world...

Tricky, but doable.

Lod  posted on  2006-07-02   20:25:28 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Red Jones (#0)

i don't agree that anyone in this evil ungodly government is in authority over me nor do i agree that there is any man in authority over me. in the story of daniel you cited, my impression is that he never submitted, but rather lay low in order to survive.

Bring 'Em Home

christine  posted on  2006-07-02   20:32:49 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: lodwick (#1)

I say that this is one of the best, the most salient posts that I've ever read on this topic.

thanks for that compliment.

I'm not trying to be controversial. It is an important subject that weighs on us.

Red Jones  posted on  2006-07-02   20:33:59 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: Red Jones (#0)

And when the king came and told him to openly worship the new god he simply told the king that he would not do this.

IOW Daniel did not submit to the king's authority. Neither did the early Christians who chose death rather than sacrifice to the emperor, a false god.

Ada  posted on  2006-07-02   20:35:17 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: Red Jones (#3)

I'm not trying to be controversial.

Cripes - that's just what we need more of today - controversial thoughts and thinking. Whatever it takes to arouse the slumbering sheep from their narcoleptic sonambulism.

(Thank goodness I just reloaded the ink cartridges and the paper for that 87 page download from emo! This information best cure what ailes me...)

Lod  posted on  2006-07-02   20:52:06 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: Ada (#4)

IOW Daniel did not submit to the king's authority.

naysayers love to say 'no'.

maybe the king was given certain authority, no more.

as lodwick said. we are 'in this world' we are not 'of this world'. we live in this world and should recognize that there are certain people and institutions given certain authorities over us in this world. but our loyalty in terms of worshiping is elsewhere.

but to each his own.

Red Jones  posted on  2006-07-02   21:10:28 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: Red Jones (#0)

Christian inquisition live & well coming soon to where you live

Max  posted on  2006-07-02   21:10:36 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: christine (#2)

...nor do i agree that there is any man in authority over me....

No, I can picture you dominating a relationship, with the appropriate wardrobe and accessories of course!

For some reason I see you in red, though! ;)

HOUNDDAWG  posted on  2006-07-02   21:13:36 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: Red Jones (#0)

Let us not forget the Israelite mid-wives that were under orders from the Pharoah to kill the males born to the Israelite women ... they refused to do this ... and check out Nehemiah 5 ... where Nehemiah could be mistaken for a modern day tax protester that has taken a mob to the authorities demanding that they give them their shit back !!!

In Biblical old english translation it says ... "give us back this day, I pray thee ..." which could have been translated give us back our shit that you've stolen through taxation right now !!!

I have trouble with some of the writings of Paul. He contradicts Old Testament authority in many instances and is responsible for 75-80% of the New Testament. He was a Pharisee, trained by the premier Pharisee of his day, Gamaliel. Paul's brother or half brother was a Roman Senator, Rufus Pudens, so he was a political hack as well as a writer. Christ didn't trust the Pharisees and neither do I. Paul's claims of conversion are his own, and his antagonists were often times "real" apostles that walked with Christ, one being James, the brother of Christ.

Romans 13 would have Christians accepting the mark of the beast should the authorities mandate compliance ... when Revelation tells you it will cause those that receive it to suffer the wine of the wrath of God.

What say ye ?

If ye love wealth greater than liberty, the tranquility of servitude greater than the animating contest for freedom, go home from us in peace. We seek not your counsel, nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds (smites) you; and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen.

Samuel Adams ... and I concur !

noone222  posted on  2006-07-02   21:34:55 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: HOUNDDAWG (#8)

i do love red but i'm not an authoritarian. ;)

Bring 'Em Home

christine  posted on  2006-07-02   21:39:11 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: christine (#10)

i do love red but i'm not an authoritarian. ;)

Of course not!

I was only kidding!

Hell, if you were in to that I'm sure that I'd have seen the pix by now! ;)

HOUNDDAWG  posted on  2006-07-02   21:45:10 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: noone222 (#9)

What say ye ?

I say that Paul's writing have caused more controversy, and misunderstandings, than have any other of the Saints.

Had 90% of his missives never been found, what a wonderful world it would be.

imo

Lod  posted on  2006-07-02   21:50:55 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: noone222 (#9)

What say ye ?

you make a good case. I guess that at best what is said in Romans 13 is a biblical principle we should take to heart. But in other locations there are principles that can be interpreted in such a way as to contradict interpretations of romans 13.

that is the way it is throughout - there are principles we're to take to heart. and then in actual circumstances we have to decide how to interpret what principal in what situation ... hopefully with our conscience as our guide.

I think it is an important principle in Romans 13. We must respect our employers not because our employers are good or necessarilly worthy of anything, but because they are over us and we are told to respect them. same with other authorities, like government.

but as for me, if they told me to serve in the war, I would refuse and rather go to jail. there are limits even in how I interpret this.

Red Jones  posted on  2006-07-02   21:52:35 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: Red Jones (#0)

For rulers are not a terror to good works, but to the evil. Wilt thou then not be afraid of the power? do that which is good, and thou shalt have praise of the same:

Obviously God was not talking about the rulers we have in this government, because they most definitely are a terror to good works and rewarded of evil works. The government has used Romans 13 throughout history to try to get Christians to comply with them. However what evil governments fail to realize is God wasn't talking about them at all. God doesn't consider them a power or real rulers, only deluded humans do. Submitting to them is a mistake; I will never do it.

God is always good!
"It was an interesting day." - President Bush, recalling 9/11 [White House, 1/5/02] More and more of our imports come from overseas. - George W. Bush

RickyJ  posted on  2006-07-02   21:58:21 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: lodwick (#12)

I think it's noteworthy that Paul was killing Christians for awhile, and then claims the vision and conversion etc., ... but maybe he was just another shit stirring Jew. (He was of the Tribe of Benjamin, they too had become converts to the Babylonian Talmud or Traditions of Men when taken captive.

If ye love wealth greater than liberty, the tranquility of servitude greater than the animating contest for freedom, go home from us in peace. We seek not your counsel, nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds (smites) you; and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen.

Samuel Adams ... and I concur !

noone222  posted on  2006-07-02   22:00:08 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: Red Jones (#0)

Romans 13 can only apply to a godly government. Had our founders believed Romans 13, we would still be a colony of Great Britain. Instead they resisted the tyranny from England and founded the greatest CHRISTAIN nation on earth, with all the blessing from GOD. We were the envey of the world...we produced more, invented more, created more than ANY nation on earth...all from the blessings from GOD. Should the Germans have followed Hitler? Should our Christain soldiers be following our leaders into a war, based on lies. NO, surly not.

As government grows, it takes on the premise of becoming god, it cares for the needy by stealing from those that have, it offers security, while at the same time terrorizing the citizenry, it offers us an legal system then selectively enforces the laws. Notice, after 911 how the people cried for the govenment to "make them secure". Only Christ can offer security and protect the people and nation. Government has become god to many people.

The rallying cry during the revolution was "no king, but king Jesus". I don't think Daniel would have paid into a system that promoted homosexuality or funded the killing of 50 million babies. We have kicked GOD out of every institution we have...only to be forced to accept "their" religion of mulitcultralism... and it is a religion.

We are about to witness what happens when Christians roll over and accept the evil that is before them. GOD blessed us with the greatest nation ever born, born out of rebellion, not acceptance, bought with the blood of godly men and patriots. We are where we are today because Godly men have acquittanced from their responsibilites, we have squandered GODS gift. We have been bought and paid for by mammon. The price will be vengence from GOD...count on it. No man can serve 2 gods without being disloyal to 1. Resistance to evil is not an option...it's an obligation

Freedomsnotfree  posted on  2006-07-02   22:04:14 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#17. To: noone222 (#15)

but maybe he was just another shit stirring Jew. (He was of the Tribe of Benjamin, they too had become converts to the Babylonian Talmud or Traditions of Men when taken captive.

I'd never thought of that possibility - thanks.

So much to mull, in so little time.

Lod  posted on  2006-07-02   22:04:44 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: Freedomsnotfree (#16)

you made a great post in #16. I'd like to respond to pieces of it.

Romans 13 can only apply to a godly government.

of everything in your post, this is what I disagree with most. I think that when it suits god's purposes he does put evil people in charge. I remember reading in proverbs that as a rule god does not let evil men prosper, except when it is in god's purpose to raise them up for some reason. and I think that is happening today on a large scale. the day of vengeance is coming (as you said in last paragraph of your post). and god has allowed evil people to rule over us in preparation for it.

I think the whole purpose of Romans 13 is to tell us that we may not like these people in authority over us, and they may not be worthy, but they are still appointed over us and we've got to respect that.

Had our founders believed Romans 13, we would still be a colony of Great Britain.

I think that god does appoint the leaders of nations. and sometimes these leaders do change. and I think that god did cause our country to be founded. god gave authority to a new group and took it from the english royalty is what I think.

. Instead they resisted the tyranny from England and founded the greatest CHRISTAIN nation on earth, with all the blessing from GOD. We were the envey of the world...we produced more, invented more, created more than ANY nation on earth...all from the blessings from GOD

I think we are the greatest nation that ever was. and this is because god made it so. and I think we have a tendency to forget that. you know when he gives great blessings he expects more from those that receive those blessings. in the last few decades our country is not producing good fruit. we're spreading porn and evil and many unclean things around the world. The hebrews were blessed greatly too. and most of them could not accept jesus. and then some of them embarked on the very evil path of being anti-christ types.

Should the Germans have followed Hitler? Should our Christain soldiers be following our leaders into a war, based on lies. NO, surly not.

I can't argue with you there. I do not think that any believers should be in this war serving US military. But at the same time people are fallen. they are easily deceived. everyone falls short of the mark. So I would not serve, but I can be quick to forgive some who do. I'd rather go to jail if they drafted me.

As government grows, it takes on the premise of becoming god

that is exactly what's happening. The people who rule us are thinking that they are gods. and they're getting the masses to think that too. and we should not think that.

Only Christ can offer security and protect the people and nation

I agree. And I contend that is one of the great lessons that we must learn in this era. and that if we do not, then we will not be allowed in the kingdom of heaven which is coming. I contend that history is orchestrated to cause the people to have every opportunity to learn that lesson.

The rallying cry during the revolution was "no king, but king Jesus".

that was a great rallying cry. I respect the founders and especially the men who fought in the revolution. George Washington is my favorite American leader by far. But the dreams of the founding father I feel have failed I feel. And the component in their dreams that has failed has been man. Man has failed to put god first and has tried to rule over himself and has failed at that too.

I don't think Daniel would have paid into a system that promoted homosexuality or funded the killing of 50 million babies.

you know the government's agenda of promoting homosexuality in the schools is very evil. and we still pay taxes. I would tell my children that the schools' agenda of promoting homosexuality is evil. and I'd tell them that god's plan for us is for one woman to be with one man (and vice versa) and that this system makes us happy whereas any other system encouraged by the world leads to failure and unhappiness. but I would not march to the school principal and tell him to stop. I would do what I could within the legally allowed democratic system to change things, but we know from experience that this is futile.

We are about to witness what happens when Christians roll over and accept the evil that is before them. GOD blessed us with the greatest nation ever born, born out of rebellion, not acceptance, bought with the blood of godly men and patriots. We are where we are today because Godly men have acquittanced from their responsibilites, we have squandered GODS gift. We have been bought and paid for by mammon. The price will be vengence from GOD...count on it.

I agree 100%.

. Resistance to evil is not an option...it's an obligation

I agree 100%.

Red Jones  posted on  2006-07-02   22:50:52 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: noone222 (#15)

Babylonian Talmud

I surely think that this is an evil thing. there is much in the jewish faith that christians agree with strongly (torah). and there is much that christians must consider to be evil.

Regarding this Paul and his alleged deceptions - I have not been exposed to these ideas much, but I don't discount that there could be some truth to it.

Red Jones  posted on  2006-07-02   22:52:54 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#20. To: Red Jones (#18)

and we still pay taxes.

that's because it's forced, not voluntary.

Bring 'Em Home

christine  posted on  2006-07-02   22:55:44 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#21. To: RickyJ (#14)

God doesn't consider them a power or real rulers, only deluded humans do. Submitting to them is a mistake; I will never do it.

you make a very good case.

I certainly don't agree with those preachers who use Romans 13 to tell people to support the war. we should see that this government is evil and we should not support them. other than to pay our taxes required to be paid and follow other laws we're strictly required to follow. If there's a law that's not enforced, well that's different.

There's a fine difference between submit and support.

Red Jones  posted on  2006-07-02   22:56:03 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#22. To: Red Jones (#0)

When various Christian sects can agree on what time of day it is, maybe then your question can be answered.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2006-07-02   23:00:14 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#23. To: christine (#20)

that's because it's forced, not voluntary.

it is a subjective judgement as to whether it is forced. in that people do pay it with only the threat of coercion. People have often said that if we all together refused to pay our taxes, then the government would lose its power. but this doesn't happen. the word 'sheeple' came into being for a reason. because the people are like sheep. they do submit to those in authority over them. that is how they're made.

but I am aware that if you don't pay your taxes there can be legal consequences that are eventually enforced at the point of a gun. but very few people push the government to that limit. and given that they don't I can argue at least that the people do submit.

Red Jones  posted on  2006-07-02   23:23:26 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#24. To: Red Jones (#0)

I keep telling people we are not going to defeat them. Until jesus returns. we should remember that the meek shall inherit the earth. The kingdom of heaven will come.

I think this is the message Rove wants to get out when he meets with the mega-church pastors. Groups of people have been passively sitting on their rears since about 980 AD because the world was just about to end - and all further action was futile.

Unless you know the minute and the hour of the second coming, then I think it is best not to count on it to come save you. It might not happen for another thousand years.

Success might seem difficult, but passivity is certain defeat. I think it is better to fight under that assumption that no one is going to materialize to bail you out. If the rapture happens next week, you are way ahead of the game. If if fails to happen, you are in as good a position as you could possibly be in anyway.

If so sit on your ass waiting for someone to show up and save you, and the super natural being doesn't show up, you lose ground.

.

...  posted on  2006-07-02   23:23:43 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#25. To: Red Jones (#23)

Social Security Number (SSN) and the Mark of the Beast (666)

http://www.greaterthings.com/Conspiracy/SSN_SocialSecurityNumber_666/inde x.html

The mind once expanded by a new idea never returns to its' original size

Itisa1mosttoolate  posted on  2006-07-02   23:26:11 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#26. To: ... (#24)

I think this is the message Rove wants to get out when he meets with the mega-church pastors

No, Rove has a different game. He wants the christians at the mega-churches to think that by joining government (under Rove/Bush) they are themselves working to bring about the kingdom of heaven. but the bible says that jesus will build this kingdom when he returns. the people who believe they will establish kingdom of heaven by taking control of government are the dominion christians. People like me are hostile to them and vice versa.

I also do not interpret the 'rapture' verses as you seem to. I recommend you don't believe everything you hear.

I am convinced that we are in the season of the end of this era. and so I look to jesus' return. This will involve the people of the world being ruled over by a very evil clique that is motivated by money. It will involve an era of great temptation and wickedness where men are tried. It will involve both great oppression of the poor worldwide and huge riches for some. It will eventually involve great conflict between the nations of the earth resulting in the worst war ever and a situation where people around the world will come to know that they cannot live any more without god. It will involve judgement of the people, both the people who live now and all of the people who have died in the past. It will involve a very dramatic separation of the people where some are allowed into the kingdom of heaven to be built here on earth and some are prohibited. This is what the rapture verses refer to IMHO, the great separation that is the end-result of this era. We are all on trial. We will be judged. So, I am like many believers and do not interpret the rapture verses as the popular image does that is in your mind.

as far as a time-schedule goes - it doesn't bother me. I do not put it on my calendar. I plan for the world to continue. and the world will continue even after these events occur.

I do not believe these things to maximize my portfolio, so I don't feel it is some game where I am trying to get ahead.

Red Jones  posted on  2006-07-02   23:40:12 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#27. To: Itisa1mosttoolate (#25)

thanks for that great link.

Red Jones  posted on  2006-07-03   0:06:28 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#28. To: Red Jones (#26)

I don't think you know when the second coming is going to take place. In the late 900s people were sure it would take place at 1000 AD. The world was a lot more grim then than it is now. This sort of "waiting for the end" thinking had a profound effect on the politics of the time.

I also think that Rove and Bush would be delighted if the people would swallow this opiate and passively ignore their illegal ativities.

.

...  posted on  2006-07-03   0:10:33 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#29. To: Red Jones (#27)

http://www.nossn.org/
The evils of tyranny are rarely seen but by him who resists it. John Hay - Castilian Days, II, 1872

It's Sunday, July 2, 2006, and today is the day you learned the truth. Welcome to http://TheMarkOfTheBeast.com. I'm sure it's very disturbing to find this out, but the fact of the matter is the Social Security Number is the Mark of the Beast. You can read the proof on this website, but first I offer a solution. Now to recognize the solution, it'll help if you know the full scope of the problem. You probably think the Social Security Administration was a creation by the Roosevelt administration in 1932. That's only partially true. The ISSA (International Social Security Administration) actually predates Roosevelt's system by 5 years. You might also think the United States is the only country that has SSNs. But again you'd be wrong. At least 170 (at last count) countries participate in the Social Security System. Thus it's worldwide. You might also believe there needs to be a physical mark on your forehead or hand. But again, this is wrong in that "a mark" does not need to be physical. In fact, "a mark" can be your signature, as in, "Make your mark on the dotted line." It can also be an event or action, as in "He made his mark in history." You might also believe, based on the popular movie "The Omen" that it's going to be the number 666 on the back of the head of Satan." That's known as "misinformation." The correct Bible quote is "for it is the number of man" not "of a man." The mistranslation of that phrase is what makes people think there will be some person with a 666 tattooed on his head. In fact, "the mark" is created by mankind. To understand this, you only need to understand the meaning of the word 'of'. Thus, man created the mark, but it's the "the Beast" that is going to use it. So what is "the Beast?" Actually Revelations 13 tells us there are two beasts. One of the sea and one of land. Both "beasts" are simply governments. Revelation is full of references to "crowns." Well "crowns" are designations of authority, and in this case civil authority, ie, civil government. The reason the crown are on horns is that horns are symbols of Satan, thus these civil authorities are "hung" upon Satan, not God. Thus Satan will use civil governments to enslave the people using the social security system which was created by mankind. The Mark of the Beast. 666.

The mind once expanded by a new idea never returns to its' original size

Itisa1mosttoolate  posted on  2006-07-03   0:11:13 ET  (1 image) Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#30. To: ... (#28)

passively ignore their illegal ativities.

now I do not believe in passively ignoring their illegal activities. I try to inform people. I would like to vote them out.

Red Jones  posted on  2006-07-03   0:37:08 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#31. To: Freedomsnotfree, all (#16)

Romans 13 can only apply to a godly government. Had our founders believed Romans 13, we would still be a colony of Great Britain. Instead they resisted the tyranny from England and founded the greatest CHRISTAIN nation on earth, with all the blessing from GOD. We were the envey of the world...we produced more, invented more, created more than ANY nation on earth...all from the blessings from GOD. Should the Germans have followed Hitler? Should our Christain soldiers be following our leaders into a war, based on lies. NO, surly not.

As government grows, it takes on the premise of becoming god, it cares for the needy by stealing from those that have, it offers security, while at the same time terrorizing the citizenry, it offers us an legal system then selectively enforces the laws. Notice, after 911 how the people cried for the govenment to "make them secure". Only Christ can offer security and protect the people and nation. Government has become god to many people.

The rallying cry during the revolution was "no king, but king Jesus". I don't think Daniel would have paid into a system that promoted homosexuality or funded the killing of 50 million babies. We have kicked GOD out of every institution we have...only to be forced to accept "their" religion of mulitcultralism... and it is a religion.

We are about to witness what happens when Christians roll over and accept the evil that is before them. GOD blessed us with the greatest nation ever born, born out of rebellion, not acceptance, bought with the blood of godly men and patriots. We are where we are today because Godly men have acquittanced from their responsibilites, we have squandered GODS gift. We have been bought and paid for by mammon. The price will be vengence from GOD...count on it. No man can serve 2 gods without being disloyal to 1. Resistance to evil is not an option...it's an obligation

YOUR post is one of the most eloquent posts I've seen on the subject. If the Bible really means we must tolerate Evil, then I am not a Christian..

Well said!


Law Enforcement Against Prohibition

"Freedom and human rights in America are doomed. The U.S. government will lead the American people in ...into an unbearable hell and a choking life."
-OBL
"Prohibition...goes beyond the bounds of reason in that it attempts to control a man's appetite by legislation and makes a crime out of things that are not crimes. A prohibition law strikes at the very principles upon which our govt was founded."
- Lincoln

IndieTX  posted on  2006-07-03   0:41:34 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#32. To: Red Jones (#0)

Nevertheless, I personally feel we should take Romans 13 and similar verses seriously and submit to the authority that is put over us.

Red, I commend to you this book:

The Mystery of Romans: The Jewish Context of Paul's Letter

The "powers that be ordained by God" referenced were not the pagan Roman Imperium, Caesar, or any of our present day would-be successors to Caesar. This is an horrific mistranslation/misapplication. In the context of the Letter to the Romans, a letter addressed to new Gentile Christians still possessed of all manner of pagan baggage and much in need of instruction in the oracles of God, instruction that could be had in only one place in the world of that time, namely the Jewish synagogues of the diasporah, the "powers that are ordained by God" are the leadership of the Jewish synagogues.

Remember, this letter was written before the schism between Church and Synagogue. Christianity at that time was still a sect within Judaism. Its leadership was entirely Jewish. And Gentile believers looked to Jews for instruction in the finer points of their faith. The centers for such instruction (the only place in a pagan world where the scriptures could be heard read and studied) were the local synagogues.

Had Gentile believers followed Paul's advice, the hard schism that later developed between Church and Synagogue with all of its tragic consequences for both Gentile and Jew might have been averted. Instead, this passage became twisted by a Paganized Church into a call for submission to Caesarism. This was nothing less than theological catastrophe.

Check out my blog, America, the Bushieful.

Arator  posted on  2006-07-03   0:45:21 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#33. To: Arator (#32)

thanks Arator. I can see a number of people have given me a whole new viewpoint concerning Paul to consider.

Red Jones  posted on  2006-07-03   0:54:17 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#34. To: Arator (#32)

so you're saying the authority mentioned in Romans 13 was the synagogue specifically, and had nothing to do with government?

but then there's the gospel verses where jesus said to render unto caesar what is caesar's and unto god what is god's.

but the type of authority you feel was meant in Romans 13 was not government regardless of those caesar verses from jesus? government is a different type of authority, a lesser authority; and you feel the original meaning did not mean government at all?

that is an interpretation that is not shared by most. but that doesn't mean it's a false interpretation.

I interpreted it to mean many types of authorities including government. but all authorities have their place and you don't have to respect them when they over-step their authority.

gotto admit - christians are like sheep, for better or worse. and this tyrant that rules over us has exploited that fact. but non-christians are like sheep too it has been proven in our country.

Red Jones  posted on  2006-07-03   1:07:24 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#35. To: Red Jones (#34)

so you're saying the authority mentioned in Romans 13 was the synagogue specifically, and had nothing to do with government?

Exactly.

The thrust of Romans was all about averting a schism between Gentile believers and Jews.

The hope of Paul was that:

a) Gentile believers would submit to Jewish authority and learn the scriptures

b) Jews in the synagogues who did not yet believe would see the outworking of God in these new Gentile believers and come to faith in Yeshua themselves as a result.

But, even then, there was emerging among Gentile believers the notion that God had shifted his favor from Jews to Gentiles, that faith was a zero sum game, and that Gentile gain could only come at Jewish expense. Paul was teaching the opposite in Romans - that the divine plan was not to favor either Jew OR Gentile, but both Jew AND Gentile, united in one community of faith, and that it was imperative that new Gentile believers not act in ways that would impede their Jewish brethren from likewise coming to faith in their Messiah, Yeshua.

These are poor summaries of what is a deep and profound scholarly exegesis of Romans done by Nanos. I encourage you to read his book and come to your own conclusions.

Check out my blog, America, the Bushieful.

Arator  posted on  2006-07-03   1:30:25 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#36. To: Arator (#35)

The thrust of Romans was all about averting a schism between Gentile believers and Jews.

The hope of Paul was that:

a) Gentile believers would submit to Jewish authority and learn the scriptures

b) Jews in the synagogues who did not yet believe would see the outworking of God in these new Gentile believers and come to faith in Yeshua themselves as a result.

I have to respectfully disagree with you here. IMO the rulers talked about in Romans 13 that God appointed surely are not synagogue rulers. God would not ordain false rulers or powers; any power not ordained by him is false. Synagogue leaders were rejecters of Christ, hence false powers and rulers, they were not the ones Paul was referring to in Romans 13.

Since God ordains the rulers, these rulers must be rulers he recognizes, rulers that he approves of, indeed even his ministers. These rulers IMO are the elders of the church of Christ. The sword here IMO is not referring to a physical sword, but the word of God, which is sharper than a two-edged sword. The Christians number one weapon against the evil unbelievers is the word of God. And for anyone that thinks that Paul was referring to the Roman government all they have to do is to look at what the Roman government did to Paul, they executed him. Why would they execute someone that was not a threat to them and was telling his followers to obey the government? They wouldn't. Paul was a threat to them because he was leading people to reject their evil mandates, and to obey God, and not man. Paul was essentially taking the evil Roman leaders’ power and influence over the people away from them, and they didn't like it one bit.

God is always good!
"It was an interesting day." - President Bush, recalling 9/11 [White House, 1/5/02] More and more of our imports come from overseas. - George W. Bush

RickyJ  posted on  2006-07-03   2:53:03 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#37. To: Arator, All (#35)

Paul was teaching the opposite in Romans - that the divine plan was not to favor either Jew OR Gentile, but both Jew AND Gentile, united in one community of faith

A dandy reason to be VERY careful when reading Paul's writings.... The Jews keep their own traditions that are not the same as the Mosaic Law of the Bible. Their traditions are known as the Babylonian Talmud because that is where the rabbinical teachings originated. Yahshua the Christ condemned the Scribes and Pharisees for keeping their own, anti-Mosaic traditions, the "traditions of the elders." (Matt. Chap. 15.) It is those traditions, which were most vehemently condemned by Yahshua (Matt., Chaps. 15-28; 16:6) and which are today known as Judaism. James addresses his message to the 12 tribes scattered abroad. (James 1:1). By the time of Christ, the Twelve Tribes had already been established in the Caucasus, Europe and Asia Minor. The Jews of Judea were not expelled from Judea until around 70 A.D., well after these verses were composed. This is proof that James was not addressing Jews but rather Israelites. Yahshua said: "I come not but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel." - Matt. 15:24; and "Go only to the house of Israel." - Matt. 10:6.

The chosen people (descendants of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob) were also to "separate themselves unto the Lord." -- Lev. 6:22 ."Wherefore come out from among them, and be ye separate, saith the Lord." -- 2 Chron. 6:17. "For thou art an holy people unto the LORD thy God: the LORD thy God hath chosen thee to be a special people unto himself, above all people that are upon the face of the earth." -- Deu. 7:6. "For thou art an holy people unto Yahweh thy God; Yahweh, the LORD thy God, hath chosen thee to be a special people unto himself, above all people that are on the face of the earth." -- Deu. 14:2. "And to make thee high above all nations which he hath made, in praise, and in name, and in honour; and that thou mayest be an holy people unto the LORD thy God, as he hath spoken."-Deu. 26:19. "The LORD shall establish thee an holy people unto himself, as he hath sworn unto thee, if thou shalt keep the commandments of the LORD thy God, and walk in his ways." -- Deu. 28:9. "But ye are a chosen generation, a royal priesthood, an holy nation, a peculiar people," -- 1 Peter 2:9.

The Anglo-Saxons are the direct, genetic descendants of the twelve tribes of Israel. The Assyrians had deported Beth-Omri (the House of King Omri, king of the 10 northern tribes) to the plains of Media, just south of the Caucasus Mountains. These deportations occurred between 745-715 B.C. These people became known as Scythians and Saccae before and during their migrations north through the Caucasus. Hence: Beth-Omri = Beth-Sak (House of Isaac) = the Caucasians = the Anglo-Saxons. "In Isaac shall thy seed be called." -- Gen. 21:12. Note that the Jews are not now, nor were they ever, known by the name of Isaac. Before these deportations, around 1500 B.C., large contingents of the tribes of Judah and Benjamin had already migrated from Egypt to Britain and Ireland before the Exodus. These two tribes of the House of Judah were merged back into the House of Isaac by the Saxon King, William the Conqueror. Completely separate and distinct are the Jews, who are composed of two distinct groups: the Ashkenazim and the Sephardim. The Sephardim are the older branch who are descended from the mixed marriages of Judahites and Edomites from about 150 B.C to 70 A.D. These people were not dispersed until Jerusalem was destroyed by the Roman army under General Titus. It is to these people that Jesus said, "Ye are not of my sheep." -- John 10:26. The Sephardim are a mixed stock, including black African and many other racial admixtures, as the Jews themselves admit. As is evidenced in John 8:31-44, as well as in Matt. 23:35, where Yahshua accused them of the bloodshed of Abel: "That upon you may come all the righteous blood shed upon the earth, from the blood of righteous Abel." This can only mean that they are the descendants of Cain, who slew Abel. The Sephardim, therefore, have no claim to the Davidic inheritance because they are the children of the forbidden mixed marriages. They are not pure Israelites. We trace their origins back to Cain, whose father was the Serpent in the Garden. Their families and tribes, such as the Canaanites, Edomites, Hittites, and Amelekites, have historically been the enemies of true Israel, as they are today. The Khazar Jews (the Ashkenazim) are of primarily Turko/Mongolian descent. The Khazar tribes never claimed to be Shemites. Rather, they claimed descent from Japheth, Shem's brother. The twelve tribes were all Shemites because their father, Jacob/Israel was a Shemite. The Ashkenazi people, who comprise 90-95% of the Jewish people today, never were and are not now Shemites at all. They are Japhethites, Turks and Mongols. They converted to the religion of Judaism around 800 A.D. and did not have one drop of Shemitic blood in their veins! These facts make it very clear that the Modern Jew has absolutely no biblical claim to the land of Palestine. Both groups are impostors who wish to steal the inheritance of True Israel. "And in thy seed shall all the nations of the world be blessed." - Gen. 22:18. The Anglo-Saxons have given the world the Bible & Christianity, medicine, science & technology, high art, classical music, philosophy & metaphysics, the Magna Carta, and the Constitution of the United States, not to mention the feeding of the world through our agriculture. The Jews have given the world massive debt through usury, ethnic strife (especially with their false and violent claims on Palestine), special-interest politics (B'nai B'rith, the Anti-Defamation League, World Jewish Congress, the Jewish Defense League, Zionism, etc.), and decadence (pornography, organized crime, anti-Christian activism). In the twelfth and thirteenth centuries, the Jews were expelled from every nation in Europe because of their practice of usury and foreclosure and for practicing their sick and perverse Talmudic religion of deception. Name one country in the history of the world that has been blessed by the presence of the Jews!!! Even their own country seethes with constant turmoil. Its own economy cannot survive without continuous aid from the U.S. It would collapse from its own corruption. This, in spite of the fact that the world is filled with millionaire and billionaire Zionists. What is their money being used for? It is the Jews who PRETEND to be Israel so that they might reclaim the inheritance which their forefather, Esau, so foolishly sold to his brother, Jacob/Israel for a bowl of porridge. "Come, let us kill him and seize his inheritance." - Matt. 21:38, Mark 12:7; Luke 20:14. Yahweh, through His prophet, Daniel, told us that in the Last Days, all things will be revealed. "Ye shall know the Truth and the Truth shall set you free."

The proof that the Jews are not of Judah is contained in the Book of Revelation:

"I know the blasphemy of them that which say they are Jews, and are not, but are of the synagogue of Satan." -- Rev. 2:9.

"Behold, I will make them of the synagogue of Satan who say they are Jews, and are not, but do lie, I will make them to come and worship before thy feet, and to know that I have loved thee." -- Rev. 3:9. In Revelation 3:9, Jesus Christ is addressing His faithful followers. These followers cannot possibly be Jews, because the Jews have always denied Him. Jesus is saying that He will eventually make these liars come and worship at the feet of the Christians who are true to Him.

In both cases of this translation from the King James Version, the Greek word which is translated as 'Jews' is, in Strong's Concordance, the word (2453) Ioudaios, meaning "belonging to the tribe of Judah," and the word (2455) Ioudas, meaning the posterity of Judah. Interestingly, there is a related word, word number 2451, Ioudaikos, which is translated as "resembling a Judean, Jewish." To "resemble" someone is not the same as being someone. One who resembles can easily impersonate the real thing. Since we must always distinguish between the real thing and something which resembles the real thing, we must have different words for these objects. Unfortunately, the word ‘Jews’ has been used for both groups. So, the accurate translation of Rev. 2:9 is this: "I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Judahites, and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan." The Jews, who are in reality, Ioudaikos, not Ioudaios (impostors, not real), have been pretending to be Israelites since the Jewish Dispersion of 70 A.D. Here we see the beginning of the great deception that the religion of Judaism has performed for the last two thousand years of history. Judaism was not practiced by the Israelites. It was only practiced by the followers of the scribes and Pharisees. And the Pharisees were not ‘Ioudas’, Judah. They were, rather, ‘Ioudaikos’, only the resemblance of Judah. (John 8:44). In fact, the religion called Judaism has never been practiced by the House of Israel because the House of Israel was already scattered, from the Assyrian captivity starting in 745 B.C., into the "wilderness" of Europe and Asia Minor. The only exception to this rule has been when non-Jews convert to Judaism. Note well that the Jews declare descent through the mother. In contradistinction, the Old Testament and the New Testament declare descent only through the father. Read Matthew, Chapter 1 and Luke, Chapter 3 if you doubt this.

The Jews themselves confirm, indirectly, the fact that they are not the people of the blessing because they freely admit that "Everywhere we go, we are persecuted," "Everywhere we go, the specter of ‘anti-Semitism’ follows us." The question is: Does it follow them or do they bring it with them? It is a historical fact that in every nation that they have dwelt, they have always agitated for special privileges for themselves at the expense of the native population. Two modern examples of this fact, without the citizens being aware, are the building of holocaust museums at taxpayer expense and the passing of laws against "denying the holocaust." These are egregious examples of how the Jews manipulate the societies which have blessed them with a "welcome in." Contrary to what Genesis 12:3 states, the Jews have always returned the blessing with a curse by abusing the hospitality of the host nations. This is proof that the prophecy does not apply to them.

"This country has come to feel the same when congress is in session as when the baby gets hold of a hammer." Will Rogers..... "None can love freedom heartily but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license." John Milton.....

innieway  posted on  2006-07-03   5:10:31 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#38. To: innieway (#37)

Did you write the above post, or did you cut and paste it from a website? If so, what is the site?

Nintendo of the Gods  posted on  2006-07-03   6:05:19 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#39. To: Arator (#35)

well, that is very interesting. and it does put Romans 13 in a different light.

Red Jones  posted on  2006-07-03   8:12:36 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#40. To: RickyJ (#36)

that is a very interesting interpretation. I guess I need to be humble and not jump to conclusion that this government is much of an authority.

the people who rule in this government are very evil. They are causing autism and other bad health effects in the children systematically with the vaccines they require. they are putting drugs into children and others, drugs such as prozac and zoloft and ritalin, and these drugs are very harmful. they are teaching pro-homosexual doctrines in schools, etc etc etc.

to take that authority too seriously I would have to reject every spiritual authority I respect and my conscience as well.

but I still maintain that we should at least respect their worldly authority at least to the point of paying what taxes we must and not breaking into open rebellion through violence. I think at the time of the revolution open rebellion was a good thing because god blessed it. But I think at this time that the government that rules over us it is god's will that this government be destroyed by a different means, and this will be by foreign invasion eventually.

I guess I just did want to be provocative and explore these questions.

Red Jones  posted on  2006-07-03   8:26:03 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  



      .
      .
      .

Comments (41 - 117) not displayed.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest