Freedom4um

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

All is Vanity
See other All is Vanity Articles

Title: Should Christians Be Subservient To This Government?
Source: Romans 13
URL Source: http://www.blueletterbible.org/kjv/Rom/Rom013.html#1
Published: Jul 2, 2006
Author: christian bible
Post Date: 2006-07-02 20:11:00 by Red Jones
Keywords: None
Views: 6672
Comments: 117

Romans 13:1 Let every soul be subject unto the higher powers. For there is no power but of God: the powers that be are ordained of God.

Romans 13:2 Whosoever therefore resisteth the power, resisteth the ordinance of God: and they that resist shall receive to themselves damnation.

Romans 13:3 For rulers are not a terror to good works, but to the evil. Wilt thou then not be afraid of the power? do that which is good, and thou shalt have praise of the same:

Romans 13:4 For he is the minister of God to thee for good. But if thou do that which is evil, be afraid; for he beareth not the sword in vain: for he is the minister of God, a revenger to [execute] wrath upon him that doeth evil.

Romans 13:5 Wherefore [ye] must needs be subject, not only for wrath, but also for conscience sake.

Romans 13:6 For for this cause pay ye tribute also: for they are God's ministers, attending continually upon this very thing.

Romans 13:7 Render therefore to all their dues: tribute to whom tribute [is due]; custom to whom custom; fear to whom fear; honour to whom honour.

Romans 13:8 Owe no man any thing, but to love one another: for he that loveth another hath fulfilled the law.

Romans 13:9 For this, Thou shalt not commit adultery, Thou shalt not kill, Thou shalt not steal, Thou shalt not bear false witness, Thou shalt not covet; and if [there be] any other commandment, it is briefly comprehended in this saying, namely, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself.

Romans 13:10 Love worketh no ill to his neighbour: therefore love [is] the fulfilling of the law.

Romans 13:11 And that, knowing the time, that now [it is] high time to awake out of sleep: for now [is] our salvation nearer than when we believed.

Romans 13:12 The night is far spent, the day is at hand: let us therefore cast off the works of darkness, and let us put on the armour of light.

Romans 13:13 Let us walk honestly, as in the day; not in rioting and drunkenness, not in chambering and wantonness, not in strife and envying.

Romans 13:14 But put ye on the Lord Jesus Christ, and make not provision for the flesh, to [fulfil] the lusts [thereof].


a very provocative question in the title. I hope people will not be offended by it.

I have read some people's views here who criticize christians and say that the christians are overly-submissive to government's fascism.

I think there is a fine line, but a very important distinction still, between submitting to government's legitimate authority and supporting them in their evil. I try to do the former, but not the later.

I think we should be aware of the evil, but not supportive of it. Nevertheless, I personally feel we should take Romans 13 and similar verses seriously and submit to the authority that is put over us. I remember the story in the early chapters of Daniel when the Babylonians took over Jerusalem. Daniel submitted to their authority. but he told his friends that they would secretly keep the old rituals up even though the new king told them not to do this. He did not outwardly rebel, he did not raise up rebels. He only secretly obtained the things he needed and carried out the old rituals behind-closed-doors. And when the king came and told him to openly worship the new god he simply told the king that he would not do this. When the king told him he'd have him thrown in a furnace for defiance, then Daniel told the king that he would submit to this and that if this happened then his god was powerful enough to protect him from the furnace if he so chose to do so. Then the king threw him and his friends in the furnace. Then Daniel and his friends did not burn. Then the king ordered the court's accusers of Daniel to be thrown in the furnace instead. And he appointed Daniel to a high position knowing full well that he refused to worship the new god. And the king even paid respect to Daniel's god. To me Daniel was the model we should follow. He submitted to the legitimate authority of those over him here on earth. But he always worshiped god and not the king's false god. He was respectful of the authorities and did nothing to cause a rebellion. but he prevailed anyway with the help of god. To me Daniel is our model for today.

What say ye?

I think that the 'fallen-away' phenomenon is very real - that a large portion of the organized church has a faith that is against god, and yet they masquerade. And I think the 'deceived' factor is very strong. In these end-times many have beendeceived by the enemy. It is good not to be fallen-away. and it is good not to be deceived. but we still must at least submit to the authorities over us.

I keep telling people we are not going to defeat them. Until jesus returns. we should remember that the meek shall inherit the earth. The kingdom of heaven will come. The evil ones will be punished. Revenge is not ours', it is his. the sheep will be separated from the goats.

we must build our faith and do good works, look what it says in verse 3, the evil rulers cannot stop you when you do these good works. The things of man are being discredited in a powerful way. We cannot stop these events. we should be humble over them instead.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Comments (1-18) not displayed.
      .
      .
      .

#19. To: noone222 (#15)

Babylonian Talmud

I surely think that this is an evil thing. there is much in the jewish faith that christians agree with strongly (torah). and there is much that christians must consider to be evil.

Regarding this Paul and his alleged deceptions - I have not been exposed to these ideas much, but I don't discount that there could be some truth to it.

Red Jones  posted on  2006-07-02   22:52:54 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#20. To: Red Jones (#18)

and we still pay taxes.

that's because it's forced, not voluntary.

Bring 'Em Home

christine  posted on  2006-07-02   22:55:44 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#21. To: RickyJ (#14)

God doesn't consider them a power or real rulers, only deluded humans do. Submitting to them is a mistake; I will never do it.

you make a very good case.

I certainly don't agree with those preachers who use Romans 13 to tell people to support the war. we should see that this government is evil and we should not support them. other than to pay our taxes required to be paid and follow other laws we're strictly required to follow. If there's a law that's not enforced, well that's different.

There's a fine difference between submit and support.

Red Jones  posted on  2006-07-02   22:56:03 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#22. To: Red Jones (#0)

When various Christian sects can agree on what time of day it is, maybe then your question can be answered.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2006-07-02   23:00:14 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#23. To: christine (#20)

that's because it's forced, not voluntary.

it is a subjective judgement as to whether it is forced. in that people do pay it with only the threat of coercion. People have often said that if we all together refused to pay our taxes, then the government would lose its power. but this doesn't happen. the word 'sheeple' came into being for a reason. because the people are like sheep. they do submit to those in authority over them. that is how they're made.

but I am aware that if you don't pay your taxes there can be legal consequences that are eventually enforced at the point of a gun. but very few people push the government to that limit. and given that they don't I can argue at least that the people do submit.

Red Jones  posted on  2006-07-02   23:23:26 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#24. To: Red Jones (#0)

I keep telling people we are not going to defeat them. Until jesus returns. we should remember that the meek shall inherit the earth. The kingdom of heaven will come.

I think this is the message Rove wants to get out when he meets with the mega-church pastors. Groups of people have been passively sitting on their rears since about 980 AD because the world was just about to end - and all further action was futile.

Unless you know the minute and the hour of the second coming, then I think it is best not to count on it to come save you. It might not happen for another thousand years.

Success might seem difficult, but passivity is certain defeat. I think it is better to fight under that assumption that no one is going to materialize to bail you out. If the rapture happens next week, you are way ahead of the game. If if fails to happen, you are in as good a position as you could possibly be in anyway.

If so sit on your ass waiting for someone to show up and save you, and the super natural being doesn't show up, you lose ground.

.

...  posted on  2006-07-02   23:23:43 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#25. To: Red Jones (#23)

Social Security Number (SSN) and the Mark of the Beast (666)

http://www.greaterthings.com/Conspiracy/SSN_SocialSecurityNumber_666/inde x.html

The mind once expanded by a new idea never returns to its' original size

Itisa1mosttoolate  posted on  2006-07-02   23:26:11 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#26. To: ... (#24)

I think this is the message Rove wants to get out when he meets with the mega-church pastors

No, Rove has a different game. He wants the christians at the mega-churches to think that by joining government (under Rove/Bush) they are themselves working to bring about the kingdom of heaven. but the bible says that jesus will build this kingdom when he returns. the people who believe they will establish kingdom of heaven by taking control of government are the dominion christians. People like me are hostile to them and vice versa.

I also do not interpret the 'rapture' verses as you seem to. I recommend you don't believe everything you hear.

I am convinced that we are in the season of the end of this era. and so I look to jesus' return. This will involve the people of the world being ruled over by a very evil clique that is motivated by money. It will involve an era of great temptation and wickedness where men are tried. It will involve both great oppression of the poor worldwide and huge riches for some. It will eventually involve great conflict between the nations of the earth resulting in the worst war ever and a situation where people around the world will come to know that they cannot live any more without god. It will involve judgement of the people, both the people who live now and all of the people who have died in the past. It will involve a very dramatic separation of the people where some are allowed into the kingdom of heaven to be built here on earth and some are prohibited. This is what the rapture verses refer to IMHO, the great separation that is the end-result of this era. We are all on trial. We will be judged. So, I am like many believers and do not interpret the rapture verses as the popular image does that is in your mind.

as far as a time-schedule goes - it doesn't bother me. I do not put it on my calendar. I plan for the world to continue. and the world will continue even after these events occur.

I do not believe these things to maximize my portfolio, so I don't feel it is some game where I am trying to get ahead.

Red Jones  posted on  2006-07-02   23:40:12 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#27. To: Itisa1mosttoolate (#25)

thanks for that great link.

Red Jones  posted on  2006-07-03   0:06:28 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#28. To: Red Jones (#26)

I don't think you know when the second coming is going to take place. In the late 900s people were sure it would take place at 1000 AD. The world was a lot more grim then than it is now. This sort of "waiting for the end" thinking had a profound effect on the politics of the time.

I also think that Rove and Bush would be delighted if the people would swallow this opiate and passively ignore their illegal ativities.

.

...  posted on  2006-07-03   0:10:33 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#29. To: Red Jones (#27)

http://www.nossn.org/
The evils of tyranny are rarely seen but by him who resists it. John Hay - Castilian Days, II, 1872

It's Sunday, July 2, 2006, and today is the day you learned the truth. Welcome to http://TheMarkOfTheBeast.com. I'm sure it's very disturbing to find this out, but the fact of the matter is the Social Security Number is the Mark of the Beast. You can read the proof on this website, but first I offer a solution. Now to recognize the solution, it'll help if you know the full scope of the problem. You probably think the Social Security Administration was a creation by the Roosevelt administration in 1932. That's only partially true. The ISSA (International Social Security Administration) actually predates Roosevelt's system by 5 years. You might also think the United States is the only country that has SSNs. But again you'd be wrong. At least 170 (at last count) countries participate in the Social Security System. Thus it's worldwide. You might also believe there needs to be a physical mark on your forehead or hand. But again, this is wrong in that "a mark" does not need to be physical. In fact, "a mark" can be your signature, as in, "Make your mark on the dotted line." It can also be an event or action, as in "He made his mark in history." You might also believe, based on the popular movie "The Omen" that it's going to be the number 666 on the back of the head of Satan." That's known as "misinformation." The correct Bible quote is "for it is the number of man" not "of a man." The mistranslation of that phrase is what makes people think there will be some person with a 666 tattooed on his head. In fact, "the mark" is created by mankind. To understand this, you only need to understand the meaning of the word 'of'. Thus, man created the mark, but it's the "the Beast" that is going to use it. So what is "the Beast?" Actually Revelations 13 tells us there are two beasts. One of the sea and one of land. Both "beasts" are simply governments. Revelation is full of references to "crowns." Well "crowns" are designations of authority, and in this case civil authority, ie, civil government. The reason the crown are on horns is that horns are symbols of Satan, thus these civil authorities are "hung" upon Satan, not God. Thus Satan will use civil governments to enslave the people using the social security system which was created by mankind. The Mark of the Beast. 666.

The mind once expanded by a new idea never returns to its' original size

Itisa1mosttoolate  posted on  2006-07-03   0:11:13 ET  (1 image) Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#30. To: ... (#28)

passively ignore their illegal ativities.

now I do not believe in passively ignoring their illegal activities. I try to inform people. I would like to vote them out.

Red Jones  posted on  2006-07-03   0:37:08 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#31. To: Freedomsnotfree, all (#16)

Romans 13 can only apply to a godly government. Had our founders believed Romans 13, we would still be a colony of Great Britain. Instead they resisted the tyranny from England and founded the greatest CHRISTAIN nation on earth, with all the blessing from GOD. We were the envey of the world...we produced more, invented more, created more than ANY nation on earth...all from the blessings from GOD. Should the Germans have followed Hitler? Should our Christain soldiers be following our leaders into a war, based on lies. NO, surly not.

As government grows, it takes on the premise of becoming god, it cares for the needy by stealing from those that have, it offers security, while at the same time terrorizing the citizenry, it offers us an legal system then selectively enforces the laws. Notice, after 911 how the people cried for the govenment to "make them secure". Only Christ can offer security and protect the people and nation. Government has become god to many people.

The rallying cry during the revolution was "no king, but king Jesus". I don't think Daniel would have paid into a system that promoted homosexuality or funded the killing of 50 million babies. We have kicked GOD out of every institution we have...only to be forced to accept "their" religion of mulitcultralism... and it is a religion.

We are about to witness what happens when Christians roll over and accept the evil that is before them. GOD blessed us with the greatest nation ever born, born out of rebellion, not acceptance, bought with the blood of godly men and patriots. We are where we are today because Godly men have acquittanced from their responsibilites, we have squandered GODS gift. We have been bought and paid for by mammon. The price will be vengence from GOD...count on it. No man can serve 2 gods without being disloyal to 1. Resistance to evil is not an option...it's an obligation

YOUR post is one of the most eloquent posts I've seen on the subject. If the Bible really means we must tolerate Evil, then I am not a Christian..

Well said!


Law Enforcement Against Prohibition

"Freedom and human rights in America are doomed. The U.S. government will lead the American people in ...into an unbearable hell and a choking life."
-OBL
"Prohibition...goes beyond the bounds of reason in that it attempts to control a man's appetite by legislation and makes a crime out of things that are not crimes. A prohibition law strikes at the very principles upon which our govt was founded."
- Lincoln

IndieTX  posted on  2006-07-03   0:41:34 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#32. To: Red Jones (#0)

Nevertheless, I personally feel we should take Romans 13 and similar verses seriously and submit to the authority that is put over us.

Red, I commend to you this book:

The Mystery of Romans: The Jewish Context of Paul's Letter

The "powers that be ordained by God" referenced were not the pagan Roman Imperium, Caesar, or any of our present day would-be successors to Caesar. This is an horrific mistranslation/misapplication. In the context of the Letter to the Romans, a letter addressed to new Gentile Christians still possessed of all manner of pagan baggage and much in need of instruction in the oracles of God, instruction that could be had in only one place in the world of that time, namely the Jewish synagogues of the diasporah, the "powers that are ordained by God" are the leadership of the Jewish synagogues.

Remember, this letter was written before the schism between Church and Synagogue. Christianity at that time was still a sect within Judaism. Its leadership was entirely Jewish. And Gentile believers looked to Jews for instruction in the finer points of their faith. The centers for such instruction (the only place in a pagan world where the scriptures could be heard read and studied) were the local synagogues.

Had Gentile believers followed Paul's advice, the hard schism that later developed between Church and Synagogue with all of its tragic consequences for both Gentile and Jew might have been averted. Instead, this passage became twisted by a Paganized Church into a call for submission to Caesarism. This was nothing less than theological catastrophe.

Check out my blog, America, the Bushieful.

Arator  posted on  2006-07-03   0:45:21 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#33. To: Arator (#32)

thanks Arator. I can see a number of people have given me a whole new viewpoint concerning Paul to consider.

Red Jones  posted on  2006-07-03   0:54:17 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#34. To: Arator (#32)

so you're saying the authority mentioned in Romans 13 was the synagogue specifically, and had nothing to do with government?

but then there's the gospel verses where jesus said to render unto caesar what is caesar's and unto god what is god's.

but the type of authority you feel was meant in Romans 13 was not government regardless of those caesar verses from jesus? government is a different type of authority, a lesser authority; and you feel the original meaning did not mean government at all?

that is an interpretation that is not shared by most. but that doesn't mean it's a false interpretation.

I interpreted it to mean many types of authorities including government. but all authorities have their place and you don't have to respect them when they over-step their authority.

gotto admit - christians are like sheep, for better or worse. and this tyrant that rules over us has exploited that fact. but non-christians are like sheep too it has been proven in our country.

Red Jones  posted on  2006-07-03   1:07:24 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#35. To: Red Jones (#34)

so you're saying the authority mentioned in Romans 13 was the synagogue specifically, and had nothing to do with government?

Exactly.

The thrust of Romans was all about averting a schism between Gentile believers and Jews.

The hope of Paul was that:

a) Gentile believers would submit to Jewish authority and learn the scriptures

b) Jews in the synagogues who did not yet believe would see the outworking of God in these new Gentile believers and come to faith in Yeshua themselves as a result.

But, even then, there was emerging among Gentile believers the notion that God had shifted his favor from Jews to Gentiles, that faith was a zero sum game, and that Gentile gain could only come at Jewish expense. Paul was teaching the opposite in Romans - that the divine plan was not to favor either Jew OR Gentile, but both Jew AND Gentile, united in one community of faith, and that it was imperative that new Gentile believers not act in ways that would impede their Jewish brethren from likewise coming to faith in their Messiah, Yeshua.

These are poor summaries of what is a deep and profound scholarly exegesis of Romans done by Nanos. I encourage you to read his book and come to your own conclusions.

Check out my blog, America, the Bushieful.

Arator  posted on  2006-07-03   1:30:25 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#36. To: Arator (#35)

The thrust of Romans was all about averting a schism between Gentile believers and Jews.

The hope of Paul was that:

a) Gentile believers would submit to Jewish authority and learn the scriptures

b) Jews in the synagogues who did not yet believe would see the outworking of God in these new Gentile believers and come to faith in Yeshua themselves as a result.

I have to respectfully disagree with you here. IMO the rulers talked about in Romans 13 that God appointed surely are not synagogue rulers. God would not ordain false rulers or powers; any power not ordained by him is false. Synagogue leaders were rejecters of Christ, hence false powers and rulers, they were not the ones Paul was referring to in Romans 13.

Since God ordains the rulers, these rulers must be rulers he recognizes, rulers that he approves of, indeed even his ministers. These rulers IMO are the elders of the church of Christ. The sword here IMO is not referring to a physical sword, but the word of God, which is sharper than a two-edged sword. The Christians number one weapon against the evil unbelievers is the word of God. And for anyone that thinks that Paul was referring to the Roman government all they have to do is to look at what the Roman government did to Paul, they executed him. Why would they execute someone that was not a threat to them and was telling his followers to obey the government? They wouldn't. Paul was a threat to them because he was leading people to reject their evil mandates, and to obey God, and not man. Paul was essentially taking the evil Roman leaders’ power and influence over the people away from them, and they didn't like it one bit.

God is always good!
"It was an interesting day." - President Bush, recalling 9/11 [White House, 1/5/02] More and more of our imports come from overseas. - George W. Bush

RickyJ  posted on  2006-07-03   2:53:03 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#37. To: Arator, All (#35)

Paul was teaching the opposite in Romans - that the divine plan was not to favor either Jew OR Gentile, but both Jew AND Gentile, united in one community of faith

A dandy reason to be VERY careful when reading Paul's writings.... The Jews keep their own traditions that are not the same as the Mosaic Law of the Bible. Their traditions are known as the Babylonian Talmud because that is where the rabbinical teachings originated. Yahshua the Christ condemned the Scribes and Pharisees for keeping their own, anti-Mosaic traditions, the "traditions of the elders." (Matt. Chap. 15.) It is those traditions, which were most vehemently condemned by Yahshua (Matt., Chaps. 15-28; 16:6) and which are today known as Judaism. James addresses his message to the 12 tribes scattered abroad. (James 1:1). By the time of Christ, the Twelve Tribes had already been established in the Caucasus, Europe and Asia Minor. The Jews of Judea were not expelled from Judea until around 70 A.D., well after these verses were composed. This is proof that James was not addressing Jews but rather Israelites. Yahshua said: "I come not but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel." - Matt. 15:24; and "Go only to the house of Israel." - Matt. 10:6.

The chosen people (descendants of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob) were also to "separate themselves unto the Lord." -- Lev. 6:22 ."Wherefore come out from among them, and be ye separate, saith the Lord." -- 2 Chron. 6:17. "For thou art an holy people unto the LORD thy God: the LORD thy God hath chosen thee to be a special people unto himself, above all people that are upon the face of the earth." -- Deu. 7:6. "For thou art an holy people unto Yahweh thy God; Yahweh, the LORD thy God, hath chosen thee to be a special people unto himself, above all people that are on the face of the earth." -- Deu. 14:2. "And to make thee high above all nations which he hath made, in praise, and in name, and in honour; and that thou mayest be an holy people unto the LORD thy God, as he hath spoken."-Deu. 26:19. "The LORD shall establish thee an holy people unto himself, as he hath sworn unto thee, if thou shalt keep the commandments of the LORD thy God, and walk in his ways." -- Deu. 28:9. "But ye are a chosen generation, a royal priesthood, an holy nation, a peculiar people," -- 1 Peter 2:9.

The Anglo-Saxons are the direct, genetic descendants of the twelve tribes of Israel. The Assyrians had deported Beth-Omri (the House of King Omri, king of the 10 northern tribes) to the plains of Media, just south of the Caucasus Mountains. These deportations occurred between 745-715 B.C. These people became known as Scythians and Saccae before and during their migrations north through the Caucasus. Hence: Beth-Omri = Beth-Sak (House of Isaac) = the Caucasians = the Anglo-Saxons. "In Isaac shall thy seed be called." -- Gen. 21:12. Note that the Jews are not now, nor were they ever, known by the name of Isaac. Before these deportations, around 1500 B.C., large contingents of the tribes of Judah and Benjamin had already migrated from Egypt to Britain and Ireland before the Exodus. These two tribes of the House of Judah were merged back into the House of Isaac by the Saxon King, William the Conqueror. Completely separate and distinct are the Jews, who are composed of two distinct groups: the Ashkenazim and the Sephardim. The Sephardim are the older branch who are descended from the mixed marriages of Judahites and Edomites from about 150 B.C to 70 A.D. These people were not dispersed until Jerusalem was destroyed by the Roman army under General Titus. It is to these people that Jesus said, "Ye are not of my sheep." -- John 10:26. The Sephardim are a mixed stock, including black African and many other racial admixtures, as the Jews themselves admit. As is evidenced in John 8:31-44, as well as in Matt. 23:35, where Yahshua accused them of the bloodshed of Abel: "That upon you may come all the righteous blood shed upon the earth, from the blood of righteous Abel." This can only mean that they are the descendants of Cain, who slew Abel. The Sephardim, therefore, have no claim to the Davidic inheritance because they are the children of the forbidden mixed marriages. They are not pure Israelites. We trace their origins back to Cain, whose father was the Serpent in the Garden. Their families and tribes, such as the Canaanites, Edomites, Hittites, and Amelekites, have historically been the enemies of true Israel, as they are today. The Khazar Jews (the Ashkenazim) are of primarily Turko/Mongolian descent. The Khazar tribes never claimed to be Shemites. Rather, they claimed descent from Japheth, Shem's brother. The twelve tribes were all Shemites because their father, Jacob/Israel was a Shemite. The Ashkenazi people, who comprise 90-95% of the Jewish people today, never were and are not now Shemites at all. They are Japhethites, Turks and Mongols. They converted to the religion of Judaism around 800 A.D. and did not have one drop of Shemitic blood in their veins! These facts make it very clear that the Modern Jew has absolutely no biblical claim to the land of Palestine. Both groups are impostors who wish to steal the inheritance of True Israel. "And in thy seed shall all the nations of the world be blessed." - Gen. 22:18. The Anglo-Saxons have given the world the Bible & Christianity, medicine, science & technology, high art, classical music, philosophy & metaphysics, the Magna Carta, and the Constitution of the United States, not to mention the feeding of the world through our agriculture. The Jews have given the world massive debt through usury, ethnic strife (especially with their false and violent claims on Palestine), special-interest politics (B'nai B'rith, the Anti-Defamation League, World Jewish Congress, the Jewish Defense League, Zionism, etc.), and decadence (pornography, organized crime, anti-Christian activism). In the twelfth and thirteenth centuries, the Jews were expelled from every nation in Europe because of their practice of usury and foreclosure and for practicing their sick and perverse Talmudic religion of deception. Name one country in the history of the world that has been blessed by the presence of the Jews!!! Even their own country seethes with constant turmoil. Its own economy cannot survive without continuous aid from the U.S. It would collapse from its own corruption. This, in spite of the fact that the world is filled with millionaire and billionaire Zionists. What is their money being used for? It is the Jews who PRETEND to be Israel so that they might reclaim the inheritance which their forefather, Esau, so foolishly sold to his brother, Jacob/Israel for a bowl of porridge. "Come, let us kill him and seize his inheritance." - Matt. 21:38, Mark 12:7; Luke 20:14. Yahweh, through His prophet, Daniel, told us that in the Last Days, all things will be revealed. "Ye shall know the Truth and the Truth shall set you free."

The proof that the Jews are not of Judah is contained in the Book of Revelation:

"I know the blasphemy of them that which say they are Jews, and are not, but are of the synagogue of Satan." -- Rev. 2:9.

"Behold, I will make them of the synagogue of Satan who say they are Jews, and are not, but do lie, I will make them to come and worship before thy feet, and to know that I have loved thee." -- Rev. 3:9. In Revelation 3:9, Jesus Christ is addressing His faithful followers. These followers cannot possibly be Jews, because the Jews have always denied Him. Jesus is saying that He will eventually make these liars come and worship at the feet of the Christians who are true to Him.

In both cases of this translation from the King James Version, the Greek word which is translated as 'Jews' is, in Strong's Concordance, the word (2453) Ioudaios, meaning "belonging to the tribe of Judah," and the word (2455) Ioudas, meaning the posterity of Judah. Interestingly, there is a related word, word number 2451, Ioudaikos, which is translated as "resembling a Judean, Jewish." To "resemble" someone is not the same as being someone. One who resembles can easily impersonate the real thing. Since we must always distinguish between the real thing and something which resembles the real thing, we must have different words for these objects. Unfortunately, the word ‘Jews’ has been used for both groups. So, the accurate translation of Rev. 2:9 is this: "I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Judahites, and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan." The Jews, who are in reality, Ioudaikos, not Ioudaios (impostors, not real), have been pretending to be Israelites since the Jewish Dispersion of 70 A.D. Here we see the beginning of the great deception that the religion of Judaism has performed for the last two thousand years of history. Judaism was not practiced by the Israelites. It was only practiced by the followers of the scribes and Pharisees. And the Pharisees were not ‘Ioudas’, Judah. They were, rather, ‘Ioudaikos’, only the resemblance of Judah. (John 8:44). In fact, the religion called Judaism has never been practiced by the House of Israel because the House of Israel was already scattered, from the Assyrian captivity starting in 745 B.C., into the "wilderness" of Europe and Asia Minor. The only exception to this rule has been when non-Jews convert to Judaism. Note well that the Jews declare descent through the mother. In contradistinction, the Old Testament and the New Testament declare descent only through the father. Read Matthew, Chapter 1 and Luke, Chapter 3 if you doubt this.

The Jews themselves confirm, indirectly, the fact that they are not the people of the blessing because they freely admit that "Everywhere we go, we are persecuted," "Everywhere we go, the specter of ‘anti-Semitism’ follows us." The question is: Does it follow them or do they bring it with them? It is a historical fact that in every nation that they have dwelt, they have always agitated for special privileges for themselves at the expense of the native population. Two modern examples of this fact, without the citizens being aware, are the building of holocaust museums at taxpayer expense and the passing of laws against "denying the holocaust." These are egregious examples of how the Jews manipulate the societies which have blessed them with a "welcome in." Contrary to what Genesis 12:3 states, the Jews have always returned the blessing with a curse by abusing the hospitality of the host nations. This is proof that the prophecy does not apply to them.

"This country has come to feel the same when congress is in session as when the baby gets hold of a hammer." Will Rogers..... "None can love freedom heartily but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license." John Milton.....

innieway  posted on  2006-07-03   5:10:31 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#38. To: innieway (#37)

Did you write the above post, or did you cut and paste it from a website? If so, what is the site?

Nintendo of the Gods  posted on  2006-07-03   6:05:19 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#39. To: Arator (#35)

well, that is very interesting. and it does put Romans 13 in a different light.

Red Jones  posted on  2006-07-03   8:12:36 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#40. To: RickyJ (#36)

that is a very interesting interpretation. I guess I need to be humble and not jump to conclusion that this government is much of an authority.

the people who rule in this government are very evil. They are causing autism and other bad health effects in the children systematically with the vaccines they require. they are putting drugs into children and others, drugs such as prozac and zoloft and ritalin, and these drugs are very harmful. they are teaching pro-homosexual doctrines in schools, etc etc etc.

to take that authority too seriously I would have to reject every spiritual authority I respect and my conscience as well.

but I still maintain that we should at least respect their worldly authority at least to the point of paying what taxes we must and not breaking into open rebellion through violence. I think at the time of the revolution open rebellion was a good thing because god blessed it. But I think at this time that the government that rules over us it is god's will that this government be destroyed by a different means, and this will be by foreign invasion eventually.

I guess I just did want to be provocative and explore these questions.

Red Jones  posted on  2006-07-03   8:26:03 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#41. To: innieway (#37)

you make a lot of great arguments and have a lot of good scripture to back it up.

I agree with most of what you say, but the one thing I am skeptical on is the idea that Anglo-Saxons are direct genetic descendants of the 12 tribes. I thank you for sharing that because I know that some believe that and it is considered a taboo thing to think. I thought that the 'chosen people' who inherit these blessings of god were to be a people who believe, not a people who are genetic descendants of the early hebrews. So I am open to the idea that America is the new Jerusalem, but I would think this is done because of the faith that many Americans have or had in the past, not because of genetic descent from early Israel.

I agree completely though that Revelation 2:9 & Revelation 3:9 show that those who claim this blessing in modern-day Israel are frauds.

I thought there were verses somewhere in Old Testament that specifically say that those who inherit the blessings of old Israel are not genetic descendents, but spiritual descendants (those who believe) instead. I wish I knew where those verses are.

Red Jones  posted on  2006-07-03   9:31:25 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#42. To: RickyJ, Red Jones, innieway (#36)

I have to respectfully disagree with you here. IMO the rulers talked about in Romans 13 that God appointed surely are not synagogue rulers. God would not ordain false rulers or powers; any power not ordained by him is false. Synagogue leaders were rejecters of Christ, hence false powers and rulers, they were not the ones Paul was referring to in Romans 13.

At the time Romans was written, one cannot generalize as you have about "synagogue leaders".

Remember, at the time Paul wrote Romans:

1) Rabbinical Judaism was yet unformed. There were many contending and rival Judaisms. Pharisees, Sadducees, Essenes, Zealots and, yes, Jewish followers of Yeshua all contended with each other about what it meant to be a faithful Jew (or Gentile), a faithful follower of the one true God.

2) The Temple still stood. Followers of Jesus (like his brother, James/Jacob) set on the Sanhedrin in Jerusalem. In Jerusalem, tens of thousands of Jews, both great and small, believed that Yeshua was their promised Messiah, as did many Jews among the diasporah.

In other words, it was not yet clear that Judaism and the Jewish sect that was to become Christianity were inextricably opposed. It need not have been so. Had Paul's hopes been realized, it would not have been so. But, alas, they were not.

It is a mistake to read into the text of Romans a world that then did not yet exist. The tragic schisms between Church and Synagogue were yet future. What Judaism was was still up for grabs at the time of his writings. And the Synagogue was still the only place where one could go and learn of the one true God in a pagan, fallen world. It was a place for all non-pagans, not just those of the Phariseeical variety. At least it was for a time, before the tragedy of schism separated Jew from Gentile and Synagogue from Church. Such a schism seems inevitable from our vantage point in time, but from Paul's vantage point, such a disaster (for both Jew and Gentile alike) was only a worst case scenario. Paul was working to save both Gentiles and his people from the disaster that did come. That he did not do so was not for want of trying.

Check out my blog, America, the Bushieful.

Arator  posted on  2006-07-03   10:57:29 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#43. To: Arator, RickyJ, innieway, all (#42)

thanks for the great responses. much food for thought.

Red Jones  posted on  2006-07-03   11:16:34 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#44. To: noone222 (#9)

Let us not forget the Israelite mid-wives that were under orders from the Pharoah to kill the males born to the Israelite women ... they refused to do this

that is a very good point. and I'd like to expand on it.

In those events described in first 2-3 books of bible the Israelites did in fact defy the government authorities. and that does put Romans 13 in a different light.

Why did they defy? I think the bible says this tribe of hebrews was given over to slavery under pharoah and this slavery lasted 400 years. but then god wanted to free them and bring them out. He told Moses that he wanted this and Moses orchestrated this rebellion against or at least defiance of pharoah. And part of that was the Israelites purposely not following orders they were given by pharoah as a result as you said.

the aspect of the story I like to emphasize is that pharoah was made by god to do things that were stupid and bad and against the interests of himself and his own people. the pharoah grew to understand that the israelites were favored by god and this was at that time god's purpose to show his favor to a people, so that he could make his presence known. and other peoples were harmed severely in the process. Pharoah knew he couldn't beat moses and his god. yet bible says that god made pharoah's heart cold and stubborn and try to defeat them anyway. He had his army follow the Israelites as the Israelites fled his kingdom. and he knew that god protected the israelites, yet he did this anyway. and what happened? His army was destroyed in the river. In other words god orchestrated pharoah the ruler to do things that harmed severely the egyptians under his rule.

god can use rulers to do things that are bad for the people under them. when we rebel from god he puts in charge people who harm us. we must learn who to worship, who is god and to follow his rules. otherwise we will not really prosper on a permanent basis.

One of my main themes is to convince people that democracy is bunk. We are proud and foolish to think that we rule ourselves. Democracy as practiced today in our country is a complete fraud. and I tell you all that god does let evil rulers rule if it suits his purpose.

The day of vengeance we've mentioned on this page is coming, and pursuant to that god has allowed evil rulers to rule. we don't like them, but they are in charge here on earth.

Red Jones  posted on  2006-07-03   11:28:29 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#45. To: AllTheKings'HorsesWontDoIt (#0)

ping

Red Jones  posted on  2006-07-03   12:10:32 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#46. To: Red Jones (#41)

the one thing I am skeptical on is the idea that Anglo-Saxons are direct genetic descendants of the 12 tribes.

Isaac was living in Canaan, and this is where his sons Esau and Jacob were born. Esau was the first born, and was red (Genesis 25:25). Jacob was the younger of the twins. Jacob is the one that would later have his name changed by The Creator to Israel.

When the time came for Jacob to marry, his father Isaac forbade him to marry of the women in Canaan (Genesis 28:1). Jacob was instructed to go to their "homeland" and choose a wife from among the daughters of Laban, who was Jacob's uncle (Jacob's mother's brother - Genesis 28:2). If you look up Laban in Strong's Concordance, you will find that the name means "to be white"!!!

I used to think somewhat the same as you that the "chosen" were believers more than genetic. But I began to wonder why there was such a tedious accounting of lineages in the book of Genesis especially. So I began to look up each name in the Strong's Concordance, and started linking genealogies.... Believe me, it's all in there for a reason - to show the truth to us as to who we are, and put the puzzle pieces together. This whole "Jew" thing is a huge fraud - call it the world's greatest case of "Identity theft"!!

In the linking of genealogies, it is important to note that Ashkenaz (remember Ashkenazi jews) was a descendant of Japeth, NOT Shem... We get the word Semite from the name Shem. Interestingly, the name Japeth means (per Strong's Concordance) expansion.... And expand they have - now making up by far the largest percentage of modern "Jewry"!!! But they are NOT Semites, never were, never will be; and have never been favored by the Creator nor the ones His promises were made to.. Those would be the descendants of Shem (whose name means honor).

So yes, genealogy is VERY important, AND Anglo Saxons are direct descendants of Jacob - the 12 tribes of Israel... However, that doesn't mean that ONLY Anglo Saxons are the direct descendants. Jacob married 2 daughters of Laban - Leah and Rachel.. He had first fallen madly in love with Rachel (who apparently was quite the looker), and was basically TRICKED into marrying Leah. Anyhow, with Leah, Jacob fathered 4 children, but Rachel was barren. So Rachel instructed her handmaid to have children for her with Jacob! There were 2 children born of this "pairing". Later, Leah also instructed HER handmaid to bear children by Jacob - which resulted in 2 more children.. (We are now up to 8 kids) Then Leah bore 3 more. And finally, Rachel bore one (bringing the total to 12)- they named him Joseph.. (See Genesis chapters 29, 30). It was Joseph that was sold into slavery in Egypt, and Joseph that was so favored by the Creator that he eventually wound up holding the second highest position of authority in Egypt - second only to Pharoah; and his descendants during that 400 years of slavery turned into a HUGE number that were exiled from Egypt by Moses... Anyhow, back to the Anglo Saxon deal, there are 4 of the 12 tribes of Israel that were born to mothers that we basically have no genealogical background to - nor any clue as to their ethnicity, but there is little doubt that the other 8 (of the lineage of Laban) were white.

"This country has come to feel the same when congress is in session as when the baby gets hold of a hammer." Will Rogers..... "None can love freedom heartily but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license." John Milton.....

innieway  posted on  2006-07-03   12:24:51 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#47. To: Nintendo of the Gods (#38)

Did you write the above post, or did you cut and paste it from a website? If so, what is the site?

Nintendo - see: http://www.anglo-saxonisrael.com/

"This country has come to feel the same when congress is in session as when the baby gets hold of a hammer." Will Rogers..... "None can love freedom heartily but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license." John Milton.....

innieway  posted on  2006-07-03   12:36:49 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#48. To: Freedomsnotfree (#16)

We are about to witness what happens when Christians roll over and accept the evil that is before them. GOD blessed us with the greatest nation ever born, born out of rebellion, not acceptance, bought with the blood of godly men and patriots. We are where we are today because Godly men have acquittanced from their responsibilites, we have squandered GODS gift. We have been bought and paid for by mammon. The price will be vengence from GOD...count on it. No man can serve 2 gods without being disloyal to 1. Resistance to evil is not an option...it's an obligation

Take a look at this, http://www.dem ocraticunderground.com/top10/06/250_fish.jpg

Ghandi once asked about why Christians didn't act more like Christ. Kurt Vonnegut asks why are Christians are more likely to quote the ten Commandments but not the Beattitudes. We would be much better off.

The 7th MJS2U2  posted on  2006-07-03   13:01:13 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#49. To: Arator (#42)

So-called "Judaism" of that time was a cult, not in any way were the leaders of it doing God's will. They were practicing the traditions of men that they made up themselves; the New Testament is very clear on this. Also Paul was writing to the Christians of Rome in that letter. Rome was ruled by the Romans, and they cared not one whit for the cult called Judaism. Why would Paul tell the Christians in Rome to obey rulers who had no real authority over them in any man made legal way?

The rulers God ordained are the elders of the church of Christ. Paul was telling them to submit to their authority because they were ministers of his and had a responsibility to lead them in example and deed, and to minister to their needs. He surely was not telling them to submit to leaders of a cult. BTW, it was Jesus Christ himself that caused the division among the people. It was he that called the Synagogue leasers false Jews and devils and vipers. It was he that established the church that was and still is today ordained by God. If the Jews of that time were truly practicing the teachings of God written in the Old Testament they would not of been members of the that present day cult called Judaism to begin with. They had fallen away and listened to leaders that said things they like to hear, as many “Christians” are doing today and established religions based on man’s teachings and not God’s.

God is always good!
"It was an interesting day." - President Bush, recalling 9/11 [White House, 1/5/02] More and more of our imports come from overseas. - George W. Bush

RickyJ  posted on  2006-07-03   13:11:07 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#50. To: Red Jones (#40)

but I still maintain that we should at least respect their worldly authority at least to the point of paying what taxes we must and not breaking into open rebellion through violence.

Jesus never taught his followers to take up the sword and establish and Earthly kingdom by force. They wanted to, but his kingdom was and is not of this world, so he rebuked them. The wars Christians are to fight are spiritual wars, wars for something far more precious than silver or gold, the souls of humankind. Earthly governments rise and Earthly governments fall, but God’s kingdom never falls, and will never end.

God is always good!
"It was an interesting day." - President Bush, recalling 9/11 [White House, 1/5/02] More and more of our imports come from overseas. - George W. Bush

RickyJ  posted on  2006-07-03   13:32:30 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#51. To: Red Jones (#44)

Red, your analysis matches that of Tupper Saussy in effect. He advances the theory that the Roman Catholic Church has been appointed to oppress sinners internationally.

I agreed with much of what Tupper had to say in his book (Rulers of Evil), but disagreed with his theory re: the Church. The Roman Church is an offshoot of the Babylonians, just like the Illuminati and Ashkenazi Jews. These three entities are the Trinity of Evil and are one. They are the cabal of evil, and all of them are Talmudizing the world.

Basically they are three shells of the shell game and it's up to you to find which one the pea is under after a quick shuffle ... but the truth is there is no pea.

God said that He wrote His law in His Children's hearts ... we (His Children) know what's right and what's wrong ... we don't need a gaggle of sick murderers running our lives, passing laws to regulate our behavior, and making us slaves in our own land. He told Moses to lead His people out of bondage ... Jesus says "where I am there is liberty" ... that's why there isn't much liberty around here anymore

You're wholly entitled to your opinion and your willingness to cooperate with the government authorities, however I would warn you that God said "I wished you were either "HOT" or "COLD" but you were luke warm so I spewed you out of my mouth ! We can't serve two masters for we will love the one and hate the other. We cannot be in His will and be hypocrits ... we can't be for life and finance death ... I'm really sick of the double-mindedness of the so-called Christian Community at large (Not you Red), that has been confused to think they can serve two masters. He says "Let your yea be yea and no be no, but swear no oaths ... well that's what the pledge of allegiance is ... a fealty oath.

God is like your dad. My dad never got mad at me for whipping a bully's ass, rather he got mad if I hesitated to fight the bully.

[Side Note:] Modern Jewry are descended from Edom according to their own Jewish Encyclopedia. Take a look at the Book of Obadiah and ponder their fate. That's where He states "Vengeance is mine" !!!

If ye love wealth greater than liberty, the tranquility of servitude greater than the animating contest for freedom, go home from us in peace. We seek not your counsel, nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds (smites) you; and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen.

Samuel Adams ... and I concur !

noone222  posted on  2006-07-03   14:03:14 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#52. To: RickyJ, noone222, Arator, Freedomsnotfree, AllTheKings'HorsesWontDoIt, innieway, Nintendo of the Gods, IndieTX (#50)

here's a neat picture. the whore of babylon.

Red Jones  posted on  2006-07-03   16:34:51 ET  (1 image) Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#53. To: Red Jones (#45)

I've been watching this thread since last night. I started to post some more things to ponder and just checked in to see what was happening before I posted. I read innieway's comment with interest, but I have to take issue with it.

Let me post what I had started before I lose it, because my computer is starting to get hung up.

This IS cut and paste for the most part. You really should read these in their entirety. It's fairly fast reading:

First, on Romans 13 [highlights]:

Romans 13, the Higher LIBERTY:

"...Let every soul be subject unto the higher powers. For there is no power but of God: the powers that be are ordained of God. Romans 13 1

Of course we should honor true authority such as our Father and Mother but that is not what Romans 131 is talking about. The Greek word exousia translated in Romans 13 1 as power or authority actually means the "right to choose".

"1) power of choice, liberty of doing as one pleases."2

It is also translated as the word "right" in Re 22:14:

Blessed [are] they that do his commandments, that they may have [exousia] right to the tree of life, and may enter in through the gates into the city.

The whole idea of the tree of life is about choice and the right to choose, to obey God and follow him and not your own willfulness or the will of some government created by men to have dominion over you as we see with Cain, Nimrod and Pharaoh.

Paul is simply telling you in Romans 13 that you should remain subject to the better liberty or right to choose.

Exousia is even translated as "liberty" in 1Co 8:9:

But take heed lest by any means this liberty of yours become a stumblingblock to them that are weak.

The word liberty in this verse is the same word translated power in Romans 13. Christ came to set men free not to deliver them into the bondage of governments like Egypt. Early Christians were part of a government appointed by Christ and were cast out of the Pharisitical system of Judea by the thousands when the accepted Christ at Pentecost. They began to live according to those precepts of the perfect law of liberty, with free will offerings to a servant government.

The ministers appointed by Christ were told they were not to be like the governments of the other nations who offered benefits to the people but exercised authority one over the other. They were not to use the right arm of government to enforce the charitable contributions on the left side of government. All the offerings in Christ's government were free will contributions...."

http://www.hisholychurc h.net/sermon/Romans13.html

-------------------------------------------------------------------

Check the concordance at your link at blueletterbible for POWER.

Rom 13:1 Let every soul be subject unto the higher powers. For there is no power but of God: the powers that be are ordained of God.

Rom 13:2 Whosoever therefore resisteth the power, resisteth the ordinance of God: and they that resist shall receive to themselves damnation.

I did and got a variety of definitions:

Greek for 1849

Pronunciation Guide exousia {ex-oo-see'-ah}

Root Word from 1832 (in the sense of ability)

Outline of Biblical Usage

1) power of choice, liberty of doing as one pleases

a) leave or permission

2) physical and mental power

a) the ability or strength with which one is endued, which he either possesses or exercises

3) the power of authority (influence) and of right (privilege)

4) the power of rule or government (the power of him whose will and commands must be submitted to by others and obeyed)

a) universally

1) authority over mankind

b) specifically

1) the power of judicial decisions

2) of authority to manage domestic affairs

c) metonymically

1) a thing subject to authority or rule

a) jurisdiction

2) one who possesses authority

a) a ruler, a human magistrate

b) the leading and more powerful among created beings superior to man, spiritual potentates

d) a sign of the husband's authority over his wife

1) the veil with which propriety required a women to cover herself

e) the sign of regal authority, a crown For Synonyms see entry 5820

Note that Jesus seems to give authority to His SERVANTS here:

Mar 13:34 [For the Son of man is] as 5613 a man 444 taking a far journey 590, who left 863 his 846 house 3614, and 2532 gave 1325 authority 1849 to his 846 servants 1401, and 2532 to every man 1538 his 846 work 2041, and 2532 commanded 1781 the porter 2377 to 2443 watch 1127 .

That's as far as I got, before my computer started acting up.

---------------------------------------------------------------------

The Christian "Anarchist" view of Romans 13:

"This web page takes a position contrary to most everything stated by..... most Christians.

First, the Bible has much more to say about the State than is found in Romans 13. One must also consult Revelation 13, Isaiah 13, and the books of the Kings, as well as the scathing denunciations of the State by the Old Testament prophets. Read through every verse in the Bible and ask yourself, "Is this where God commanded human beings to form 'the State?'" Your answer will always be "No."

Second, what Romans 13 says about the State is hardly flattering, when understood correctly. What exactly does Paul mean by "the powers?" (See Ephesians 6:12) We believe Romans 13 has a negative, rather than positive assessment of the State. "Ordained" simply means "predestined." A tyrannical, murderous dictator is "the minister of God." because he "serves" God's purposes. God predestines all things, even evil.

Third, we agree with most Christians that this passage encourages "submission" to the State, but not "patriotic" submission; rather the submission that Paul had just finished teaching in Romans 12:

Be not overcome of evil, but overcome evil with good. Dearly beloved, avenge not yourselves, but rather give place unto wrath: for it is written, Vengeance is mine; I will repay, saith the Lord. Bless them which persecute you: bless, and curse not. Romans 12:21, 19, 14.

Believing the State to be evil, we oppose patriotism, but as followers of Christ, Christian anarchists do not take the path of violent revolution against it (1 Peter 2:21). We denounce even the American Revolution (1776). Vine & Fig Tree advocates pacifism...."

http://home.aol.com/x maspiracy/5/Romans13/index.htm

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Another point of view:

A World Without "The State"

"...Patriarchy?

All human beings are created in families. Patriarchy is an inescapable concept. If the Christian pater does not train his family in the Ways of Peace, he will be oppressed by a “paternalistic” State. The Family is the basic social unit of a prosperous society.

The Institution called "The State" is unBiblical. It reflects rebellion against God's Law.

Obedience through the Family eliminates tyranny, protects property.

The whole history of man as recorded in the Bible is the history of sinful rebellion against society as created in the Garden of Eden, and the construction of institutions based on Humanistic power: coercion and violence. It is the history of Politics vs. Patriarchy.

Theocracy?

The word comes from two Greek words meaning "rule of God." Most people think it means "the rule of priests." It does not. What would happen if everyone obeyed God's Law? What would happen if a nation were truly "under God," and could say without hypocrisy, "In God We Trust?"

200 million people in America claim to be Christian. If all of them would obey the commands of Christ in their homes and businesses refuse to give their "vote" to those who will not obey the commands of Christ, declare their allegiance to God above "the state" and remove from public office those who refuse to obey God's Law the State would disappear.

One reason many of these Christians don't actively work for Micah's Vine & Fig Tree society is that they believe God has predestined the world to get worse and worse. This is an unBiblical view. [link at site]

A second reason many Christians don't actively work for Micah's Vine & Fig Tree society is that they believe God has "ordained" the State, and that God commands us to have a State, and abolishing the State would be contrary to His will. This too is an unBiblical view. It begins with an erroneous interpretation of Paul's Letter to the Romans.

Vine & Fig Tree's Romans 13 Home Page

The most disastrously misunderstood Biblical text in history! Romans 13 says "the powers that be are ordained of God." Defenders of the State take this to mean that "the State" is an idea that conforms to God's ethical standards, and that "the State" has God's ethical approval. Nothing could be further from the truth.

By using the word "powers" the Apostle Paul uses a Greek word which means "demonic" everywhere else in the New Testament. But does God "ordain" evil? Yes, emphatically: God ordains evil. The State is evil, and the message of Romans 12-13 is directly counter to the agenda of modern evangelical defenders of the status quo...."

http://home.aol.com/v ftfiles/Directory/5a_state.htm

-------------------------------------------------------------------

CHRISTIAN “ANARCHISM”

In a Nutshell

"1. Christians are commanded to submit to evil in the Lord.

Submission to evil doers . . . Matthew 5 (“Resist not evil” “Turn the other cheek”) Romans 12-13 (“Do not avenge yourselves – Vengeance is Mine”) I Peter 2 (“Submit to every human statute – follow His steps”) . . . is Submission to God: submission to evil doers is God's command.

But “Submission” is “in the Lord”: Disobedience is commanded: • when something commanded by God is forbidden by the State • when something forbidden by God is commanded by the State Acts 5:29

Scriptural commands to citizens to “submit” to the evil deeds of the State do not excuse the evil doer

do not justify his evil acts ..."

http://home.aol.com/XianAnarch /6points.htm

-----------------------------------------------------------

More articles on the subject:

CAUSE

Christians Against the United States Empire Non-violent, Scriptural Resistance to "Pax Americana." [index]

http://members.aol.com/ XianAnarch/cause/index.htm

------------------------------------------------------

What's Wrong With the Good 'Old US of A?

CAUSE: Christians Against the United States Empire Non-violent, Scriptural Resistance to "Pax Americana."

"...It used to be the case that only those who affirmed the Christian vision of the organic law were allowed to become politicians or attorneys. Atheists were not allowed to testify in court. Those who signed the Constitution recognized the importance of Christianity to our system of government. But in this century, the Christian vision of America has been flushed down the Orwellian Memory Hole. The Supreme Court has held that Christians who hold the non- conforming views of CAUSE cannot become an attorney, or even an American citizen. CAUSE is challenging this policy in Federal Court. Our concern is not so much that we can become American citizens, but rather that we not meet an untimely demise, like those in Waco and Ruby Ridge, merely because of our nonconforming views.

....The Terrorist State

The U.S. is no longer spreading the Gospel of Jesus Christ, but the "gospel" of violence. The "gospel" of "might makes right." An evolving "gospel" of Darwinian conquest of the weak, whether of the un-born sacrificed on the altar of "career," or a million innocent Iraqi peasants, whose lives purchased low oil prices. We have become a nation of people who will kill their neighbor to get what they want, whether it's gangs after drugs, politicians after votes, or middle-class armaments workers after a TV Dinner and a programmable VCR....."

http://home.aol.com/Xia nAnarch/cause/us_wrong.htm

-----------------------------------------------------------------

"Just as the Empire executed Christ, so it is threatened by those through whom Christ lives today. Galatians 2:20

The Christmas Conspiracy! is a growing number of Christians around the world whose goal reaches beyond the U.S. and seeks to hasten the day in which all governments will "beat their swords into plowshares and their spears into pruninghooks" and everyone will sit safely and securely "under their Vine and Fig Tree" (Micah 4:1-7). The way to achieve a "Vine & Fig Tree" society is to overthrow the governments of every nation on earth by persuading dictators and bureaucrats to recognize publicly and officially that the Babe born on the first Christmas is the only legitimate King. Our weapons are reason and logic, our strategy is mass political resignation, not assassination, and our tactics are persuasion and winsome character, not force and violence. This goal is to be achieved by putting Christ's commands into practice in our own lives.... We are the New Conspiracy

The Old Conspiracy is History

http://thechristmasconspiracy.com/

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

THE CONSTITUTION WILL BE ABOLISHED

The only question is, WHO will abolish it? or perhaps stated another way WHAT will replace it?

Either THEY will abolish the U.S. on THEIR terms, for THEIR purposes,

or WE will abolish the U.S. on OUR terms and for OUR purposes...."

http://thechristmasconspi racy.com/abolition.htm

I agree with this. Ezekiel 17:1-10/Matthew 15:13.

--------------------------------------------------------------

There is a whole lot more at this site, and while I don't agree with everything, I think he does cause one to think about things in an entirely new way, and he offers a Biblical way to return this nation to God, although I, like you, often think that Jesus is going to settle the argument Himself one fine day. However, we are told TO OCCUPY until He comes. I also think we are not only GOING to be invaded, but HAVE been invaded. I also think the Bible pinpoints when the day of redemption comes. Look at Daniel 24, and the prophecy of the coming of Christ. Apparently the time was fulfilled TO THE DAY.

I want to read the rest of the comments.

AllTheKings'HorsesWontDoIt  posted on  2006-07-03   16:49:15 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#54. To: AllTheKings'HorsesWontDoIt (#53)

thanks for all that information.

Red Jones  posted on  2006-07-03   17:18:49 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#55. To: AllTheKings'HorsesWontDoIt (#53)

Why do ChristmasGuys reject armed revolution?

That was how we got started here.

Thanks.

Lod  posted on  2006-07-03   17:25:34 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#56. To: innieway (#46)

You have posted some incredibly interesting things, and I want to go back and read them more closely. However, I think what you are preaching here is racist and harmful to Christ's message. He came to draw ALL people to Himself. Contemplate John 3:16 for a minute. Also contemplate I Timothy 1:4 : "Neither give heed to fables and endless genealogies, which minister questions, rather than godly edifying which is in faith: so do."

It's not about genes, but faith.

"In Isaac shall thy seed be called." -- Gen. 21:12.

Let's take the whole passage, and understand that the Bible says: Search the scripture, every word of prophecy will have its mate. The Bible is full of hidden pictures, that aren't always fully understood until it is time. [Speaking of the bondwoman Hagar, and her son Ishmael, whom Sarah wanted cast out]: Genesis 21:9 And Sarah saw the son Hagar the Egyptian, which she had born unto Abraham, mocking. 10 Wherefore she said unto Abraham, Cast out this bondwoman and her son: for the son of this bondwoman shall not be heir with my son, even with Isaac. 11 And the thing was very grievous in Abraham's sight because of his son. 12 And God said unto Abraham, Let it not be grievous in they sight because of the lad, and because of thy bondwoman; in all that Sarah hath said unto thee, hearken unto her voice; for IN ISAAC SHALL THY SEED BE CALLED. 13 And also of the son of the bondwoman will I make a nation, because he is thy seed. [Now here I want to mention that it was JESUS who appeared to Hagar in the desert to tell her to go back to her mistress, and that HE would increase Ishmael's seed. Even though Ishmael was not the seed or bloodline, which would produce Christ, God still cared.]

Read Galatians 3:16-29. Verse 16. Now to Abraham and his SEED were the pomises made. He saith not, And to seeds, as of many; but as of one, And to thy SEED, WHICH IS CHRIST. Verse 26. For ye are all the children of God by faith in Jesus Christ." 27. For as many of you as have been baptized into Christ have put on Christ. 28. For there is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus. 29. And if ye are Christ's, then are ye Abraham's seed, and heirs according to the promise.

Now see the ALLEGORY in Galatians 4 about the "children of the flesh" versus the "children of the promise". The children of the flesh [the physical seed of Abraham, whoever they may be], have no standing under the NEW Covenant, unless they have accepted Christ. The "children of the promise" are all those [whatever race] who take hold of the New Covenant. The children of the flesh WHO HAVE NOT ACCEPTED CHRIST have become the children of the bondwoman [Cast out the children of the bondwoman for they shall not be heir with my son.], UNLESS they take hold of the New Covenant. It doesn't matter what race they are, if they have accepted Christ, they have become the children of the FREEWOMAN and of Abraham. People of ALL RACES are the New Israel.

Remember Jesus said, I have others that are not of this fold. Them too must I bring. See Isaiah 53:10. I think it is a much-neglected verse. Of course, the Jews, I understand, won't read Isaiah 53 in their Synagogues. Small wonder, for it speaks of Christ. Isaiah 53:10 : Yet it pleased the LORD to bruise him; he hath put him to grief: when thou shalt make his soul an offering for sin, he shall see his seed, he shall prolong his days, and the pleasure of the LORD shall prosper in his hand."

This very clearly foretells who are the seed of Christ [those who accept HIM as the one-time sacrifice for sin]. Though He was CUT OFF [Isaiah 53:8; Daniel 9:26], those who believe in Him become His seed, and thus "declare His generation". THIS is the seed spoken of in Genesis 12:2-3. Genesis 12:2-3 refers to people of FAITH. Think about Rachel weeping for her lost children [Matthew 2:18]. Rachel's firstborn by the bondwoman Bilhah [Dan] was hers by ADOPTION, setting the precedent for her adoption of all the races through Christ, and Rachel will be comforted.

Read Acts 8:26-39. Recall the Ethiopians were black [Can an Ethiopian change his skin, or a leopard his spots?] Now notice that the Angel of the Lord [the Angel of the Lord is often JESUS] sends Philip to preach to the Ethiopian. The Ethiopian was well on his way to understanding what a lot of church-goers don't understand today. Note the Ethiopian is BAPTIZED IN CHRIST. [Galatians 3:27]. The black Ethiopian is just as much a part of Israel as anyone else, and as the scripture says, becomes "an heir according to the promise." [Galatians 3:29].

The same holds true for every other race, even Edom. God has a remnant of them as well:

Amos 9:11 In that day will I raise up the TABERNACLE of David that is fallen, , and close up the breaches thereof; and I will raise up his ruins, and I will build it as in the days of old. 12 That they may possess the REMNANT OF EDOM, AND OF THE HEATHEN, WHICH ARE CALLED BY MY NAME, saith the LORD that doeth this.

Likewise:

The Sephardim, therefore, have no claim to the Davidic inheritance because they are the children of the forbidden mixed marriages. They are not pure Israelites. We trace their origins back to Cain, whose father was the Serpent in the Garden. Their families and tribes, such as the Canaanites, Edomites, Hittites, and Amelekites, have historically been the enemies of true Israel, as they are today.

You named two of the forbidden tribes that THE ISRAELITES MARRIED INTO! Judges 3:5-6. The Israelites were not a pure race. God accepted strangers into his "household" if they took hold of his Old Covenant. It's not an issue under the New Covenant, because membership in the House of the LORD is BY FAITH.

Let's talk about Japheth. Genesis 9:27 God shall ENLARGE Japheth, and he SHALL DWELL IN THE TENTS OF SHEM..... Remember Jesus said that the first would be last, and the last would be first? Look at Genesis 10:1. The order of Noah's sons are SHEM, Ham, and JAPHETH [father of the Gentiles]. Then the order is reversed in the naming of the families, JAPHETH being the first one named in verse 2. See Isaiah 49:6 And he said, It is a light thing that thou shouldest be my servant to raise up the tribes of Jacob,and to restore the PRESERVED of Israel: I will also give thee for a light to the Gentiles, that thou mayest be my salvation unto the end of the earth.

See Isaiah 66:19-21. God says He will make LEVITES [priests] of the GENTILES and ALL NATIONS. Rev. 5:9-10 says God has chosen people from EVERY RACE to be kings and priests on the earth. Therefore the Ashkenazis "oppose themselves", since the promises were made to them as well, if they accept Jesus as LORD!

Go back to the rift between the two houses, and see how the Israelites felt about playing second fiddle and slaves to their brethren in the Kingdom of Judah.

1Ki 12:16 — So when all Israel saw that the king hearkened not unto them, the people answered the king, saying, What portion have we in David? neither [have we] inheritance in the son of Jesse: to your tents, O Israel: now see to thine own house, David. So Israel departed unto their tents.

http://www.bluelett erbible.org/kjv/1Ki/1Ki012.html#16

Look at how the Jews claim to be the chosen ones on the basis of birth and genes [even though we know it is a fraud]. Think of the hard feelings it causes, not to mention the violence and thievery that is the result. Think of how someone sitting in a hut in Africa, or a Palestinian whose home has been bombed, and their family killed, thinks, we have no part in their God, so why should we care or listen? Where is their hope? Would Jesus want people left with no hope? Jesus came to repair the breach, to tie up old wounds, to bring salvation and eternal life to ALL who believe in Him. He sends us to preach the gospel of His kingdom, not to preach division. He sends us to bring hope of a better day, when the meek shall inherit the earth. Race has nothing to do with it. John 3:15 For God so loved THE WORLD, that He gave His only begotten Son, that WHOMSOEVER believed, would not perish, but have everlasting life.

I hope you don't take this as criticism. I have seen the view you gave on here before, by others. Today I just couldn't keep silent any longer. People are dying out there, and it is all so very unnecessary. The devil wants to separate us from each other and from God, because he knows his days are numbered, and he'd like to take as many of us with him as he can.

AllTheKings'HorsesWontDoIt  posted on  2006-07-03   19:56:53 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#57. To: lodwick (#55)

Oh boy, you would ask me that now. I am exhausted. I don't know what's wrong with me. Please see this; I think it will answer your questions:

MOURN ON THE FOURTH OF JULY! http://home.aol.com/XianAna rch/cause/1776.htm

I think it has to do with the "yoke". The yoke of wood versus the yoke of iron, as when God sent His people to Babylon (?) for punishment. If they obeyed Him, they would get a yoke of wood. If they did not, they would get a yoke of iron. Someone correct me if I am wrong. He compares the relatively low taxes, etc. that we had before the Revolution, to what we have today.

Have you heard of the Hegelian Dialect?

http://www.wea lth4freedom.com/truth/Hegelian_Dialectic.htm

Every war we have ever fought, including the Revolutionary War were trumped up, just like 9/11. The Banksters, Crown, Judeo-Masons, Illuminati have been behind them all. The Banksters have funded both sides. They have USED us as their battle-axe, their cookie jar, their stepping-stone to their New World Order.

Please see these:

to post: Jewish Persecution Chapter 18 When Cornwallis surrendered to Washington on October 19th, 1781, he surrendered the battle, not the war. Under the Articles of Capitulation, ... http://www.sweetliberty.org/pers pective/ jewishpersecution18.htm - 54k - Cached - Similar pages

Jewish Persecution by Jackie Patru | Section Nineteen "Jonathan Williams recorded in his LEGIONS OF SATAN, 1781, that Cornwallis revealed to Washington that,. "A holy war will now begin on America, ... http://www.sweetliberty.org/pers pective/ jewishpersecution19.htm

We would think we were free, but we would in fact be subjects of the crown, working for divine government, which is the Judeo-British Monarchy.

See also THE US IS STILL A BRITISH COLONY [which actually fulfills a prophecy :) ], and THE ULTIMATE DELUSION by Stephen Ames.

Our "Independence" and "freedom" has all been a sham:

http://www.wealth4f reedom.com/truth/links2educate.htm

I am still undecided whether we will have to take up arms to defend ourselves [Micah 4:13, what does it mean, what does it mean?], but HISTORICALLY:

2Cr 10:4 (For the weapons of our warfare [are] not carnal, but mighty through God to the pulling down of strong holds;)

2Cr 10:5 Casting down imaginations, and every high thing that exalteth itself against the knowledge of God, and bringing into captivity every thought to the obedience of Christ;

http://www.blueletterb ible.org/tsk_b/2Cr/10/4.html

Jer 23:29 — [Is] not my word like as a fire? saith the LORD; and like a hammer [that] breaketh the rock in pieces?

http://www.blueletter bible.org/tsk_b/Jer/23/29.html

AllTheKings'HorsesWontDoIt  posted on  2006-07-03   20:25:59 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#58. To: AllTheKings'HorsesWontDoIt (#56)

Would Jesus want people left with no hope? Jesus came to repair the breach, to tie up old wounds, to bring salvation and eternal life to ALL who believe in Him.

God is the same yesterday, today and forever. Most Christians would agree that Christ is God, that they are one. God said he hated Esau in his mothers womb, Jacob he loved neither child having done any wrong. Where was Esau's hope ?

Most Christians equate faith with "believing" ... satan believes ... will he receive salvation unto eternal life ?

I'm glad that you mentioned the often ignored scripture where Jesus states that he has many folds ... some may be muslims, some may be Krishnas ... I don't think it's for me to question since they're His folds to do with as he chooses.

Todays Christian community has all but forgotten the Old Testament. They have gone headlong for Paul's commentary on grace, and ignore the fact that Christ himself stated that he didn't come to change the law, but to fulfill or establish it. He even went so far as to say that not a jot or tittle of the law would pass before heaven and earth passed away.

[Mat 5:18 For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled. ]

Too many of us have bought the bullshit spewed from the pulpits of pastoral prostitutes, that make salvation palatable for their own economic benefit. They promote inter-racial marriages which God forbid, they excuse homosexuality which God forbid, they have the kids dress up like ghouls on Halloween (Night of the dead) they have Easter Egg Hunts on Easter Sunday ... which is a pagan fertility ritual in remembrance of Ashtoreth, they promote Christmas which is another pagan day of worship for Semiramis, and they even put Christmas trees in their churches which are forbidden at Jeremiah 10 (The Book of Jeremiah).

Those that say God loves everybody are full of shit. It just ain't so.

The Scripture that made me really think about finding the truth was one where Christ says at the Judgment there will be "many" that will say "but lord we healed the sick and cast out demons in your name" ... to which he will reply "DEPART FROM ME FOR I NEVER KNEW YOU" ... explain that !

There is a grand delusion happening in these times. The preachers and priests of baal have filled the pulpits, like they have for 6000 years, they talk a lot of nonsense twisting scriptures by telling people ... Oh this was meant in a spiritual context, or ... this is an allegory.

2Pe 2:1 But there were false prophets also among the people, even as there shall be false teachers among you, who privily shall bring in damnable heresies, even denying the Lord that bought them, and bring upon themselves swift destruction.

2Pe 2:2 And many shall follow their pernicious ways; by reason of whom the way of truth shall be evil spoken of.

2Pe 2:3 And through covetousness shall they with feigned words make merchandise of you: whose judgment now of a long time lingereth not, and their damnation slumbereth not.

If ye love wealth greater than liberty, the tranquility of servitude greater than the animating contest for freedom, go home from us in peace. We seek not your counsel, nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds (smites) you; and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen.

Samuel Adams ... and I concur !

noone222  posted on  2006-07-03   21:01:38 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#59. To: AllTheKings'HorsesWontDoIt (#57)

Thanks so much for such a detailed answer, to what to me was only a rhetorical question...now, it's up to me to do my research from all your sources.

Cheers.

Lod  posted on  2006-07-03   21:05:58 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  



      .
      .
      .

Comments (60 - 117) not displayed.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest