Freedom4um

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

All is Vanity
See other All is Vanity Articles

Title: Should Christians Be Subservient To This Government?
Source: Romans 13
URL Source: http://www.blueletterbible.org/kjv/Rom/Rom013.html#1
Published: Jul 2, 2006
Author: christian bible
Post Date: 2006-07-02 20:11:00 by Red Jones
Keywords: None
Views: 6927
Comments: 117

Romans 13:1 Let every soul be subject unto the higher powers. For there is no power but of God: the powers that be are ordained of God.

Romans 13:2 Whosoever therefore resisteth the power, resisteth the ordinance of God: and they that resist shall receive to themselves damnation.

Romans 13:3 For rulers are not a terror to good works, but to the evil. Wilt thou then not be afraid of the power? do that which is good, and thou shalt have praise of the same:

Romans 13:4 For he is the minister of God to thee for good. But if thou do that which is evil, be afraid; for he beareth not the sword in vain: for he is the minister of God, a revenger to [execute] wrath upon him that doeth evil.

Romans 13:5 Wherefore [ye] must needs be subject, not only for wrath, but also for conscience sake.

Romans 13:6 For for this cause pay ye tribute also: for they are God's ministers, attending continually upon this very thing.

Romans 13:7 Render therefore to all their dues: tribute to whom tribute [is due]; custom to whom custom; fear to whom fear; honour to whom honour.

Romans 13:8 Owe no man any thing, but to love one another: for he that loveth another hath fulfilled the law.

Romans 13:9 For this, Thou shalt not commit adultery, Thou shalt not kill, Thou shalt not steal, Thou shalt not bear false witness, Thou shalt not covet; and if [there be] any other commandment, it is briefly comprehended in this saying, namely, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself.

Romans 13:10 Love worketh no ill to his neighbour: therefore love [is] the fulfilling of the law.

Romans 13:11 And that, knowing the time, that now [it is] high time to awake out of sleep: for now [is] our salvation nearer than when we believed.

Romans 13:12 The night is far spent, the day is at hand: let us therefore cast off the works of darkness, and let us put on the armour of light.

Romans 13:13 Let us walk honestly, as in the day; not in rioting and drunkenness, not in chambering and wantonness, not in strife and envying.

Romans 13:14 But put ye on the Lord Jesus Christ, and make not provision for the flesh, to [fulfil] the lusts [thereof].


a very provocative question in the title. I hope people will not be offended by it.

I have read some people's views here who criticize christians and say that the christians are overly-submissive to government's fascism.

I think there is a fine line, but a very important distinction still, between submitting to government's legitimate authority and supporting them in their evil. I try to do the former, but not the later.

I think we should be aware of the evil, but not supportive of it. Nevertheless, I personally feel we should take Romans 13 and similar verses seriously and submit to the authority that is put over us. I remember the story in the early chapters of Daniel when the Babylonians took over Jerusalem. Daniel submitted to their authority. but he told his friends that they would secretly keep the old rituals up even though the new king told them not to do this. He did not outwardly rebel, he did not raise up rebels. He only secretly obtained the things he needed and carried out the old rituals behind-closed-doors. And when the king came and told him to openly worship the new god he simply told the king that he would not do this. When the king told him he'd have him thrown in a furnace for defiance, then Daniel told the king that he would submit to this and that if this happened then his god was powerful enough to protect him from the furnace if he so chose to do so. Then the king threw him and his friends in the furnace. Then Daniel and his friends did not burn. Then the king ordered the court's accusers of Daniel to be thrown in the furnace instead. And he appointed Daniel to a high position knowing full well that he refused to worship the new god. And the king even paid respect to Daniel's god. To me Daniel was the model we should follow. He submitted to the legitimate authority of those over him here on earth. But he always worshiped god and not the king's false god. He was respectful of the authorities and did nothing to cause a rebellion. but he prevailed anyway with the help of god. To me Daniel is our model for today.

What say ye?

I think that the 'fallen-away' phenomenon is very real - that a large portion of the organized church has a faith that is against god, and yet they masquerade. And I think the 'deceived' factor is very strong. In these end-times many have beendeceived by the enemy. It is good not to be fallen-away. and it is good not to be deceived. but we still must at least submit to the authorities over us.

I keep telling people we are not going to defeat them. Until jesus returns. we should remember that the meek shall inherit the earth. The kingdom of heaven will come. The evil ones will be punished. Revenge is not ours', it is his. the sheep will be separated from the goats.

we must build our faith and do good works, look what it says in verse 3, the evil rulers cannot stop you when you do these good works. The things of man are being discredited in a powerful way. We cannot stop these events. we should be humble over them instead.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Comments (1-49) not displayed.
      .
      .
      .

#50. To: Red Jones (#40)

but I still maintain that we should at least respect their worldly authority at least to the point of paying what taxes we must and not breaking into open rebellion through violence.

Jesus never taught his followers to take up the sword and establish and Earthly kingdom by force. They wanted to, but his kingdom was and is not of this world, so he rebuked them. The wars Christians are to fight are spiritual wars, wars for something far more precious than silver or gold, the souls of humankind. Earthly governments rise and Earthly governments fall, but God’s kingdom never falls, and will never end.

God is always good!
"It was an interesting day." - President Bush, recalling 9/11 [White House, 1/5/02] More and more of our imports come from overseas. - George W. Bush

RickyJ  posted on  2006-07-03   13:32:30 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#51. To: Red Jones (#44)

Red, your analysis matches that of Tupper Saussy in effect. He advances the theory that the Roman Catholic Church has been appointed to oppress sinners internationally.

I agreed with much of what Tupper had to say in his book (Rulers of Evil), but disagreed with his theory re: the Church. The Roman Church is an offshoot of the Babylonians, just like the Illuminati and Ashkenazi Jews. These three entities are the Trinity of Evil and are one. They are the cabal of evil, and all of them are Talmudizing the world.

Basically they are three shells of the shell game and it's up to you to find which one the pea is under after a quick shuffle ... but the truth is there is no pea.

God said that He wrote His law in His Children's hearts ... we (His Children) know what's right and what's wrong ... we don't need a gaggle of sick murderers running our lives, passing laws to regulate our behavior, and making us slaves in our own land. He told Moses to lead His people out of bondage ... Jesus says "where I am there is liberty" ... that's why there isn't much liberty around here anymore

You're wholly entitled to your opinion and your willingness to cooperate with the government authorities, however I would warn you that God said "I wished you were either "HOT" or "COLD" but you were luke warm so I spewed you out of my mouth ! We can't serve two masters for we will love the one and hate the other. We cannot be in His will and be hypocrits ... we can't be for life and finance death ... I'm really sick of the double-mindedness of the so-called Christian Community at large (Not you Red), that has been confused to think they can serve two masters. He says "Let your yea be yea and no be no, but swear no oaths ... well that's what the pledge of allegiance is ... a fealty oath.

God is like your dad. My dad never got mad at me for whipping a bully's ass, rather he got mad if I hesitated to fight the bully.

[Side Note:] Modern Jewry are descended from Edom according to their own Jewish Encyclopedia. Take a look at the Book of Obadiah and ponder their fate. That's where He states "Vengeance is mine" !!!

If ye love wealth greater than liberty, the tranquility of servitude greater than the animating contest for freedom, go home from us in peace. We seek not your counsel, nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds (smites) you; and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen.

Samuel Adams ... and I concur !

noone222  posted on  2006-07-03   14:03:14 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#52. To: RickyJ, noone222, Arator, Freedomsnotfree, AllTheKings'HorsesWontDoIt, innieway, Nintendo of the Gods, IndieTX (#50)

here's a neat picture. the whore of babylon.

Red Jones  posted on  2006-07-03   16:34:51 ET  (1 image) Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#53. To: Red Jones (#45)

I've been watching this thread since last night. I started to post some more things to ponder and just checked in to see what was happening before I posted. I read innieway's comment with interest, but I have to take issue with it.

Let me post what I had started before I lose it, because my computer is starting to get hung up.

This IS cut and paste for the most part. You really should read these in their entirety. It's fairly fast reading:

First, on Romans 13 [highlights]:

Romans 13, the Higher LIBERTY:

"...Let every soul be subject unto the higher powers. For there is no power but of God: the powers that be are ordained of God. Romans 13 1

Of course we should honor true authority such as our Father and Mother but that is not what Romans 131 is talking about. The Greek word exousia translated in Romans 13 1 as power or authority actually means the "right to choose".

"1) power of choice, liberty of doing as one pleases."2

It is also translated as the word "right" in Re 22:14:

Blessed [are] they that do his commandments, that they may have [exousia] right to the tree of life, and may enter in through the gates into the city.

The whole idea of the tree of life is about choice and the right to choose, to obey God and follow him and not your own willfulness or the will of some government created by men to have dominion over you as we see with Cain, Nimrod and Pharaoh.

Paul is simply telling you in Romans 13 that you should remain subject to the better liberty or right to choose.

Exousia is even translated as "liberty" in 1Co 8:9:

But take heed lest by any means this liberty of yours become a stumblingblock to them that are weak.

The word liberty in this verse is the same word translated power in Romans 13. Christ came to set men free not to deliver them into the bondage of governments like Egypt. Early Christians were part of a government appointed by Christ and were cast out of the Pharisitical system of Judea by the thousands when the accepted Christ at Pentecost. They began to live according to those precepts of the perfect law of liberty, with free will offerings to a servant government.

The ministers appointed by Christ were told they were not to be like the governments of the other nations who offered benefits to the people but exercised authority one over the other. They were not to use the right arm of government to enforce the charitable contributions on the left side of government. All the offerings in Christ's government were free will contributions...."

http://www.hisholychurc h.net/sermon/Romans13.html

-------------------------------------------------------------------

Check the concordance at your link at blueletterbible for POWER.

Rom 13:1 Let every soul be subject unto the higher powers. For there is no power but of God: the powers that be are ordained of God.

Rom 13:2 Whosoever therefore resisteth the power, resisteth the ordinance of God: and they that resist shall receive to themselves damnation.

I did and got a variety of definitions:

Greek for 1849

Pronunciation Guide exousia {ex-oo-see'-ah}

Root Word from 1832 (in the sense of ability)

Outline of Biblical Usage

1) power of choice, liberty of doing as one pleases

a) leave or permission

2) physical and mental power

a) the ability or strength with which one is endued, which he either possesses or exercises

3) the power of authority (influence) and of right (privilege)

4) the power of rule or government (the power of him whose will and commands must be submitted to by others and obeyed)

a) universally

1) authority over mankind

b) specifically

1) the power of judicial decisions

2) of authority to manage domestic affairs

c) metonymically

1) a thing subject to authority or rule

a) jurisdiction

2) one who possesses authority

a) a ruler, a human magistrate

b) the leading and more powerful among created beings superior to man, spiritual potentates

d) a sign of the husband's authority over his wife

1) the veil with which propriety required a women to cover herself

e) the sign of regal authority, a crown For Synonyms see entry 5820

Note that Jesus seems to give authority to His SERVANTS here:

Mar 13:34 [For the Son of man is] as 5613 a man 444 taking a far journey 590, who left 863 his 846 house 3614, and 2532 gave 1325 authority 1849 to his 846 servants 1401, and 2532 to every man 1538 his 846 work 2041, and 2532 commanded 1781 the porter 2377 to 2443 watch 1127 .

That's as far as I got, before my computer started acting up.

---------------------------------------------------------------------

The Christian "Anarchist" view of Romans 13:

"This web page takes a position contrary to most everything stated by..... most Christians.

First, the Bible has much more to say about the State than is found in Romans 13. One must also consult Revelation 13, Isaiah 13, and the books of the Kings, as well as the scathing denunciations of the State by the Old Testament prophets. Read through every verse in the Bible and ask yourself, "Is this where God commanded human beings to form 'the State?'" Your answer will always be "No."

Second, what Romans 13 says about the State is hardly flattering, when understood correctly. What exactly does Paul mean by "the powers?" (See Ephesians 6:12) We believe Romans 13 has a negative, rather than positive assessment of the State. "Ordained" simply means "predestined." A tyrannical, murderous dictator is "the minister of God." because he "serves" God's purposes. God predestines all things, even evil.

Third, we agree with most Christians that this passage encourages "submission" to the State, but not "patriotic" submission; rather the submission that Paul had just finished teaching in Romans 12:

Be not overcome of evil, but overcome evil with good. Dearly beloved, avenge not yourselves, but rather give place unto wrath: for it is written, Vengeance is mine; I will repay, saith the Lord. Bless them which persecute you: bless, and curse not. Romans 12:21, 19, 14.

Believing the State to be evil, we oppose patriotism, but as followers of Christ, Christian anarchists do not take the path of violent revolution against it (1 Peter 2:21). We denounce even the American Revolution (1776). Vine & Fig Tree advocates pacifism...."

http://home.aol.com/x maspiracy/5/Romans13/index.htm

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Another point of view:

A World Without "The State"

"...Patriarchy?

All human beings are created in families. Patriarchy is an inescapable concept. If the Christian pater does not train his family in the Ways of Peace, he will be oppressed by a “paternalistic” State. The Family is the basic social unit of a prosperous society.

The Institution called "The State" is unBiblical. It reflects rebellion against God's Law.

Obedience through the Family eliminates tyranny, protects property.

The whole history of man as recorded in the Bible is the history of sinful rebellion against society as created in the Garden of Eden, and the construction of institutions based on Humanistic power: coercion and violence. It is the history of Politics vs. Patriarchy.

Theocracy?

The word comes from two Greek words meaning "rule of God." Most people think it means "the rule of priests." It does not. What would happen if everyone obeyed God's Law? What would happen if a nation were truly "under God," and could say without hypocrisy, "In God We Trust?"

200 million people in America claim to be Christian. If all of them would obey the commands of Christ in their homes and businesses refuse to give their "vote" to those who will not obey the commands of Christ, declare their allegiance to God above "the state" and remove from public office those who refuse to obey God's Law the State would disappear.

One reason many of these Christians don't actively work for Micah's Vine & Fig Tree society is that they believe God has predestined the world to get worse and worse. This is an unBiblical view. [link at site]

A second reason many Christians don't actively work for Micah's Vine & Fig Tree society is that they believe God has "ordained" the State, and that God commands us to have a State, and abolishing the State would be contrary to His will. This too is an unBiblical view. It begins with an erroneous interpretation of Paul's Letter to the Romans.

Vine & Fig Tree's Romans 13 Home Page

The most disastrously misunderstood Biblical text in history! Romans 13 says "the powers that be are ordained of God." Defenders of the State take this to mean that "the State" is an idea that conforms to God's ethical standards, and that "the State" has God's ethical approval. Nothing could be further from the truth.

By using the word "powers" the Apostle Paul uses a Greek word which means "demonic" everywhere else in the New Testament. But does God "ordain" evil? Yes, emphatically: God ordains evil. The State is evil, and the message of Romans 12-13 is directly counter to the agenda of modern evangelical defenders of the status quo...."

http://home.aol.com/v ftfiles/Directory/5a_state.htm

-------------------------------------------------------------------

CHRISTIAN “ANARCHISM”

In a Nutshell

"1. Christians are commanded to submit to evil in the Lord.

Submission to evil doers . . . Matthew 5 (“Resist not evil” “Turn the other cheek”) Romans 12-13 (“Do not avenge yourselves – Vengeance is Mine”) I Peter 2 (“Submit to every human statute – follow His steps”) . . . is Submission to God: submission to evil doers is God's command.

But “Submission” is “in the Lord”: Disobedience is commanded: • when something commanded by God is forbidden by the State • when something forbidden by God is commanded by the State Acts 5:29

Scriptural commands to citizens to “submit” to the evil deeds of the State do not excuse the evil doer

do not justify his evil acts ..."

http://home.aol.com/XianAnarch /6points.htm

-----------------------------------------------------------

More articles on the subject:

CAUSE

Christians Against the United States Empire Non-violent, Scriptural Resistance to "Pax Americana." [index]

http://members.aol.com/ XianAnarch/cause/index.htm

------------------------------------------------------

What's Wrong With the Good 'Old US of A?

CAUSE: Christians Against the United States Empire Non-violent, Scriptural Resistance to "Pax Americana."

"...It used to be the case that only those who affirmed the Christian vision of the organic law were allowed to become politicians or attorneys. Atheists were not allowed to testify in court. Those who signed the Constitution recognized the importance of Christianity to our system of government. But in this century, the Christian vision of America has been flushed down the Orwellian Memory Hole. The Supreme Court has held that Christians who hold the non- conforming views of CAUSE cannot become an attorney, or even an American citizen. CAUSE is challenging this policy in Federal Court. Our concern is not so much that we can become American citizens, but rather that we not meet an untimely demise, like those in Waco and Ruby Ridge, merely because of our nonconforming views.

....The Terrorist State

The U.S. is no longer spreading the Gospel of Jesus Christ, but the "gospel" of violence. The "gospel" of "might makes right." An evolving "gospel" of Darwinian conquest of the weak, whether of the un-born sacrificed on the altar of "career," or a million innocent Iraqi peasants, whose lives purchased low oil prices. We have become a nation of people who will kill their neighbor to get what they want, whether it's gangs after drugs, politicians after votes, or middle-class armaments workers after a TV Dinner and a programmable VCR....."

http://home.aol.com/Xia nAnarch/cause/us_wrong.htm

-----------------------------------------------------------------

"Just as the Empire executed Christ, so it is threatened by those through whom Christ lives today. Galatians 2:20

The Christmas Conspiracy! is a growing number of Christians around the world whose goal reaches beyond the U.S. and seeks to hasten the day in which all governments will "beat their swords into plowshares and their spears into pruninghooks" and everyone will sit safely and securely "under their Vine and Fig Tree" (Micah 4:1-7). The way to achieve a "Vine & Fig Tree" society is to overthrow the governments of every nation on earth by persuading dictators and bureaucrats to recognize publicly and officially that the Babe born on the first Christmas is the only legitimate King. Our weapons are reason and logic, our strategy is mass political resignation, not assassination, and our tactics are persuasion and winsome character, not force and violence. This goal is to be achieved by putting Christ's commands into practice in our own lives.... We are the New Conspiracy

The Old Conspiracy is History

http://thechristmasconspiracy.com/

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

THE CONSTITUTION WILL BE ABOLISHED

The only question is, WHO will abolish it? or perhaps stated another way WHAT will replace it?

Either THEY will abolish the U.S. on THEIR terms, for THEIR purposes,

or WE will abolish the U.S. on OUR terms and for OUR purposes...."

http://thechristmasconspi racy.com/abolition.htm

I agree with this. Ezekiel 17:1-10/Matthew 15:13.

--------------------------------------------------------------

There is a whole lot more at this site, and while I don't agree with everything, I think he does cause one to think about things in an entirely new way, and he offers a Biblical way to return this nation to God, although I, like you, often think that Jesus is going to settle the argument Himself one fine day. However, we are told TO OCCUPY until He comes. I also think we are not only GOING to be invaded, but HAVE been invaded. I also think the Bible pinpoints when the day of redemption comes. Look at Daniel 24, and the prophecy of the coming of Christ. Apparently the time was fulfilled TO THE DAY.

I want to read the rest of the comments.

AllTheKings'HorsesWontDoIt  posted on  2006-07-03   16:49:15 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#54. To: AllTheKings'HorsesWontDoIt (#53)

thanks for all that information.

Red Jones  posted on  2006-07-03   17:18:49 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#55. To: AllTheKings'HorsesWontDoIt (#53)

Why do ChristmasGuys reject armed revolution?

That was how we got started here.

Thanks.

Lod  posted on  2006-07-03   17:25:34 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#56. To: innieway (#46)

You have posted some incredibly interesting things, and I want to go back and read them more closely. However, I think what you are preaching here is racist and harmful to Christ's message. He came to draw ALL people to Himself. Contemplate John 3:16 for a minute. Also contemplate I Timothy 1:4 : "Neither give heed to fables and endless genealogies, which minister questions, rather than godly edifying which is in faith: so do."

It's not about genes, but faith.

"In Isaac shall thy seed be called." -- Gen. 21:12.

Let's take the whole passage, and understand that the Bible says: Search the scripture, every word of prophecy will have its mate. The Bible is full of hidden pictures, that aren't always fully understood until it is time. [Speaking of the bondwoman Hagar, and her son Ishmael, whom Sarah wanted cast out]: Genesis 21:9 And Sarah saw the son Hagar the Egyptian, which she had born unto Abraham, mocking. 10 Wherefore she said unto Abraham, Cast out this bondwoman and her son: for the son of this bondwoman shall not be heir with my son, even with Isaac. 11 And the thing was very grievous in Abraham's sight because of his son. 12 And God said unto Abraham, Let it not be grievous in they sight because of the lad, and because of thy bondwoman; in all that Sarah hath said unto thee, hearken unto her voice; for IN ISAAC SHALL THY SEED BE CALLED. 13 And also of the son of the bondwoman will I make a nation, because he is thy seed. [Now here I want to mention that it was JESUS who appeared to Hagar in the desert to tell her to go back to her mistress, and that HE would increase Ishmael's seed. Even though Ishmael was not the seed or bloodline, which would produce Christ, God still cared.]

Read Galatians 3:16-29. Verse 16. Now to Abraham and his SEED were the pomises made. He saith not, And to seeds, as of many; but as of one, And to thy SEED, WHICH IS CHRIST. Verse 26. For ye are all the children of God by faith in Jesus Christ." 27. For as many of you as have been baptized into Christ have put on Christ. 28. For there is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus. 29. And if ye are Christ's, then are ye Abraham's seed, and heirs according to the promise.

Now see the ALLEGORY in Galatians 4 about the "children of the flesh" versus the "children of the promise". The children of the flesh [the physical seed of Abraham, whoever they may be], have no standing under the NEW Covenant, unless they have accepted Christ. The "children of the promise" are all those [whatever race] who take hold of the New Covenant. The children of the flesh WHO HAVE NOT ACCEPTED CHRIST have become the children of the bondwoman [Cast out the children of the bondwoman for they shall not be heir with my son.], UNLESS they take hold of the New Covenant. It doesn't matter what race they are, if they have accepted Christ, they have become the children of the FREEWOMAN and of Abraham. People of ALL RACES are the New Israel.

Remember Jesus said, I have others that are not of this fold. Them too must I bring. See Isaiah 53:10. I think it is a much-neglected verse. Of course, the Jews, I understand, won't read Isaiah 53 in their Synagogues. Small wonder, for it speaks of Christ. Isaiah 53:10 : Yet it pleased the LORD to bruise him; he hath put him to grief: when thou shalt make his soul an offering for sin, he shall see his seed, he shall prolong his days, and the pleasure of the LORD shall prosper in his hand."

This very clearly foretells who are the seed of Christ [those who accept HIM as the one-time sacrifice for sin]. Though He was CUT OFF [Isaiah 53:8; Daniel 9:26], those who believe in Him become His seed, and thus "declare His generation". THIS is the seed spoken of in Genesis 12:2-3. Genesis 12:2-3 refers to people of FAITH. Think about Rachel weeping for her lost children [Matthew 2:18]. Rachel's firstborn by the bondwoman Bilhah [Dan] was hers by ADOPTION, setting the precedent for her adoption of all the races through Christ, and Rachel will be comforted.

Read Acts 8:26-39. Recall the Ethiopians were black [Can an Ethiopian change his skin, or a leopard his spots?] Now notice that the Angel of the Lord [the Angel of the Lord is often JESUS] sends Philip to preach to the Ethiopian. The Ethiopian was well on his way to understanding what a lot of church-goers don't understand today. Note the Ethiopian is BAPTIZED IN CHRIST. [Galatians 3:27]. The black Ethiopian is just as much a part of Israel as anyone else, and as the scripture says, becomes "an heir according to the promise." [Galatians 3:29].

The same holds true for every other race, even Edom. God has a remnant of them as well:

Amos 9:11 In that day will I raise up the TABERNACLE of David that is fallen, , and close up the breaches thereof; and I will raise up his ruins, and I will build it as in the days of old. 12 That they may possess the REMNANT OF EDOM, AND OF THE HEATHEN, WHICH ARE CALLED BY MY NAME, saith the LORD that doeth this.

Likewise:

The Sephardim, therefore, have no claim to the Davidic inheritance because they are the children of the forbidden mixed marriages. They are not pure Israelites. We trace their origins back to Cain, whose father was the Serpent in the Garden. Their families and tribes, such as the Canaanites, Edomites, Hittites, and Amelekites, have historically been the enemies of true Israel, as they are today.

You named two of the forbidden tribes that THE ISRAELITES MARRIED INTO! Judges 3:5-6. The Israelites were not a pure race. God accepted strangers into his "household" if they took hold of his Old Covenant. It's not an issue under the New Covenant, because membership in the House of the LORD is BY FAITH.

Let's talk about Japheth. Genesis 9:27 God shall ENLARGE Japheth, and he SHALL DWELL IN THE TENTS OF SHEM..... Remember Jesus said that the first would be last, and the last would be first? Look at Genesis 10:1. The order of Noah's sons are SHEM, Ham, and JAPHETH [father of the Gentiles]. Then the order is reversed in the naming of the families, JAPHETH being the first one named in verse 2. See Isaiah 49:6 And he said, It is a light thing that thou shouldest be my servant to raise up the tribes of Jacob,and to restore the PRESERVED of Israel: I will also give thee for a light to the Gentiles, that thou mayest be my salvation unto the end of the earth.

See Isaiah 66:19-21. God says He will make LEVITES [priests] of the GENTILES and ALL NATIONS. Rev. 5:9-10 says God has chosen people from EVERY RACE to be kings and priests on the earth. Therefore the Ashkenazis "oppose themselves", since the promises were made to them as well, if they accept Jesus as LORD!

Go back to the rift between the two houses, and see how the Israelites felt about playing second fiddle and slaves to their brethren in the Kingdom of Judah.

1Ki 12:16 — So when all Israel saw that the king hearkened not unto them, the people answered the king, saying, What portion have we in David? neither [have we] inheritance in the son of Jesse: to your tents, O Israel: now see to thine own house, David. So Israel departed unto their tents.

http://www.bluelett erbible.org/kjv/1Ki/1Ki012.html#16

Look at how the Jews claim to be the chosen ones on the basis of birth and genes [even though we know it is a fraud]. Think of the hard feelings it causes, not to mention the violence and thievery that is the result. Think of how someone sitting in a hut in Africa, or a Palestinian whose home has been bombed, and their family killed, thinks, we have no part in their God, so why should we care or listen? Where is their hope? Would Jesus want people left with no hope? Jesus came to repair the breach, to tie up old wounds, to bring salvation and eternal life to ALL who believe in Him. He sends us to preach the gospel of His kingdom, not to preach division. He sends us to bring hope of a better day, when the meek shall inherit the earth. Race has nothing to do with it. John 3:15 For God so loved THE WORLD, that He gave His only begotten Son, that WHOMSOEVER believed, would not perish, but have everlasting life.

I hope you don't take this as criticism. I have seen the view you gave on here before, by others. Today I just couldn't keep silent any longer. People are dying out there, and it is all so very unnecessary. The devil wants to separate us from each other and from God, because he knows his days are numbered, and he'd like to take as many of us with him as he can.

AllTheKings'HorsesWontDoIt  posted on  2006-07-03   19:56:53 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#57. To: lodwick (#55)

Oh boy, you would ask me that now. I am exhausted. I don't know what's wrong with me. Please see this; I think it will answer your questions:

MOURN ON THE FOURTH OF JULY! http://home.aol.com/XianAna rch/cause/1776.htm

I think it has to do with the "yoke". The yoke of wood versus the yoke of iron, as when God sent His people to Babylon (?) for punishment. If they obeyed Him, they would get a yoke of wood. If they did not, they would get a yoke of iron. Someone correct me if I am wrong. He compares the relatively low taxes, etc. that we had before the Revolution, to what we have today.

Have you heard of the Hegelian Dialect?

http://www.wea lth4freedom.com/truth/Hegelian_Dialectic.htm

Every war we have ever fought, including the Revolutionary War were trumped up, just like 9/11. The Banksters, Crown, Judeo-Masons, Illuminati have been behind them all. The Banksters have funded both sides. They have USED us as their battle-axe, their cookie jar, their stepping-stone to their New World Order.

Please see these:

to post: Jewish Persecution Chapter 18 When Cornwallis surrendered to Washington on October 19th, 1781, he surrendered the battle, not the war. Under the Articles of Capitulation, ... http://www.sweetliberty.org/pers pective/ jewishpersecution18.htm - 54k - Cached - Similar pages

Jewish Persecution by Jackie Patru | Section Nineteen "Jonathan Williams recorded in his LEGIONS OF SATAN, 1781, that Cornwallis revealed to Washington that,. "A holy war will now begin on America, ... http://www.sweetliberty.org/pers pective/ jewishpersecution19.htm

We would think we were free, but we would in fact be subjects of the crown, working for divine government, which is the Judeo-British Monarchy.

See also THE US IS STILL A BRITISH COLONY [which actually fulfills a prophecy :) ], and THE ULTIMATE DELUSION by Stephen Ames.

Our "Independence" and "freedom" has all been a sham:

http://www.wealth4f reedom.com/truth/links2educate.htm

I am still undecided whether we will have to take up arms to defend ourselves [Micah 4:13, what does it mean, what does it mean?], but HISTORICALLY:

2Cr 10:4 (For the weapons of our warfare [are] not carnal, but mighty through God to the pulling down of strong holds;)

2Cr 10:5 Casting down imaginations, and every high thing that exalteth itself against the knowledge of God, and bringing into captivity every thought to the obedience of Christ;

http://www.blueletterb ible.org/tsk_b/2Cr/10/4.html

Jer 23:29 — [Is] not my word like as a fire? saith the LORD; and like a hammer [that] breaketh the rock in pieces?

http://www.blueletter bible.org/tsk_b/Jer/23/29.html

AllTheKings'HorsesWontDoIt  posted on  2006-07-03   20:25:59 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#58. To: AllTheKings'HorsesWontDoIt (#56)

Would Jesus want people left with no hope? Jesus came to repair the breach, to tie up old wounds, to bring salvation and eternal life to ALL who believe in Him.

God is the same yesterday, today and forever. Most Christians would agree that Christ is God, that they are one. God said he hated Esau in his mothers womb, Jacob he loved neither child having done any wrong. Where was Esau's hope ?

Most Christians equate faith with "believing" ... satan believes ... will he receive salvation unto eternal life ?

I'm glad that you mentioned the often ignored scripture where Jesus states that he has many folds ... some may be muslims, some may be Krishnas ... I don't think it's for me to question since they're His folds to do with as he chooses.

Todays Christian community has all but forgotten the Old Testament. They have gone headlong for Paul's commentary on grace, and ignore the fact that Christ himself stated that he didn't come to change the law, but to fulfill or establish it. He even went so far as to say that not a jot or tittle of the law would pass before heaven and earth passed away.

[Mat 5:18 For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled. ]

Too many of us have bought the bullshit spewed from the pulpits of pastoral prostitutes, that make salvation palatable for their own economic benefit. They promote inter-racial marriages which God forbid, they excuse homosexuality which God forbid, they have the kids dress up like ghouls on Halloween (Night of the dead) they have Easter Egg Hunts on Easter Sunday ... which is a pagan fertility ritual in remembrance of Ashtoreth, they promote Christmas which is another pagan day of worship for Semiramis, and they even put Christmas trees in their churches which are forbidden at Jeremiah 10 (The Book of Jeremiah).

Those that say God loves everybody are full of shit. It just ain't so.

The Scripture that made me really think about finding the truth was one where Christ says at the Judgment there will be "many" that will say "but lord we healed the sick and cast out demons in your name" ... to which he will reply "DEPART FROM ME FOR I NEVER KNEW YOU" ... explain that !

There is a grand delusion happening in these times. The preachers and priests of baal have filled the pulpits, like they have for 6000 years, they talk a lot of nonsense twisting scriptures by telling people ... Oh this was meant in a spiritual context, or ... this is an allegory.

2Pe 2:1 But there were false prophets also among the people, even as there shall be false teachers among you, who privily shall bring in damnable heresies, even denying the Lord that bought them, and bring upon themselves swift destruction.

2Pe 2:2 And many shall follow their pernicious ways; by reason of whom the way of truth shall be evil spoken of.

2Pe 2:3 And through covetousness shall they with feigned words make merchandise of you: whose judgment now of a long time lingereth not, and their damnation slumbereth not.

If ye love wealth greater than liberty, the tranquility of servitude greater than the animating contest for freedom, go home from us in peace. We seek not your counsel, nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds (smites) you; and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen.

Samuel Adams ... and I concur !

noone222  posted on  2006-07-03   21:01:38 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#59. To: AllTheKings'HorsesWontDoIt (#57)

Thanks so much for such a detailed answer, to what to me was only a rhetorical question...now, it's up to me to do my research from all your sources.

Cheers.

Lod  posted on  2006-07-03   21:05:58 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#60. To: RickyJ (#49)

If the Jews of that time were truly practicing the teachings of God written in the Old Testament they would not of been members of the that present day cult called Judaism to begin with.

That's just it. They weren't. The "present day cult called Judaism" did not chrystalize until the rise of the Rabbis led by Rabbi Akiva who declared Bar Kochba to be Messiah in 132 AD, long after Paul wrote his letter to the Romans.

At the time of Paul, Rabbinical Judaism was yet future. The Pharasees (of which Paul was one) were but one of many factions. They had yet to achieve preeminence.

Check out my blog, America, the Bushieful.

Arator  posted on  2006-07-03   21:06:33 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#61. To: Arator (#60)

The "present day cult called Judaism" did not chrystalize until the rise of the Rabbis led by Rabbi Akiva who declared Bar Kochba to be Messiah in 132 AD, long after Paul wrote his letter to the Romans.

Present Day Judaism was alive and well during Christ's lifetime ... as a matter of fact they got him hung. Todays Rabbis claim they have descended in an unbroken line from the Pharisees.

Judaism is the practice of Babylonian Talmudism ... which came to Palestine upon the return of the (interbred with Babylonians) Tribes of Judah and Benjamin, after their captivity in Babylon wherein they converted to Talmudism/Judaism.

The Church of Rome is simply a subsidiary, a diversification, but all the same Babylonian, as are most of the Christian Churches existing today. The blind leading the blind into a ditch !

If ye love wealth greater than liberty, the tranquility of servitude greater than the animating contest for freedom, go home from us in peace. We seek not your counsel, nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds (smites) you; and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen.

Samuel Adams ... and I concur !

noone222  posted on  2006-07-03   21:38:49 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#62. To: AllTheKings'HorsesWontDoIt, innieway (#56)

I hope you don't take this as criticism.

well, I'm glad you don't mean it as criticism because innieway did not actually say anything racist. and he did not deny the New Covenant idea that is open to all, he did not deny John 3:15-16, nor the Galatians verses you showed us.

I'm glad I ran across innieway and that web site because I've heard about this point of view and not had opportunity to hear about it. I know that in the media this point of view is always said to be racist, it is associated with NAZIs and Klansmen. but innieway did not say anything like a NAZI or a klansman.

When I lived in Georgia in high school in early 1970's we had real klansmen right on tv campaigning for public office.

Red Jones  posted on  2006-07-03   22:08:19 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#63. To: AllTheKings'HorsesWontDoIt (#57)

thanks for that sweetliberty url because that seems like a dynamite web site.

but I couldn't find the cornwallis information. I'd like to get that.

Red Jones  posted on  2006-07-03   22:22:41 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#64. To: Red Jones (#44)

Democracy as practiced today in our country is a complete fraud. and I tell you all that god does let evil rulers rule if it suits his purpose.

I agree Red. I would add that the State of Israel is a perfect example of God allowing a fraud to achieve his own purposes !

The bulk of those squatters, trespassers and murderers calling themselves Jews residing in Palestine are actually the people God says He will personally destroy in the Book of Obadiah.

If ye love wealth greater than liberty, the tranquility of servitude greater than the animating contest for freedom, go home from us in peace. We seek not your counsel, nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds (smites) you; and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen.

Samuel Adams ... and I concur !

noone222  posted on  2006-07-03   22:36:15 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#65. To: noone222 (#64)

thanks. and I must say I've learned a lot reading the posts above. there's a lot of very good posts.

here's another wild opinion I have. we have many in our country who are strong believers. and we know that god favors nations with such believers. but at the same time we are the nation that hosts babylon. and babylon does great evil. and the nation that hosts babylon is to be destroyed or even sacrificed as far as I can see before the end of this era occurs, jesus returns and begins building his kingdom on earth. before the new covenant could be created god had to come to earth in the form of a man and provide himself as a sacrifice. he offerred himself as the sin sacrifice for all mankind. and now it seems his favorite nation is to be sacrificed. the offering is great. if he would sacrifice himself, then why are we surprised if he expects his favorite nation to be sacrificed. we need to steel ourselves to be up to the task.

I feel that we are a chosen people whether by genetics or by whatever justification.

to who he blesses greatly he expects great things in return. look at the hebrews, blessed so geatly and then scattered, and the evil allowed to build up in those among the jews who did not accept him. think about it - after jesus came the jews who rejected jesus gave us the talmud and a great evil conspiracy against jesus. and after the americans failed to build around the world the good economy & order they built in america and fell away from strong faith - it was the americans who gave us babylon. in both cases the chosen ones who fail are allowed to committ great evil.

he is powerful enough that when this great destruction comes to our country when the lieutenant nations of babylon's empire rebel and destroy babylon - he is powerful enough that he can protect us if he chooses to do so when this great destruction comes. I feel we should stay here and have faith. I don't agree with those antipas ministries fellows who say we should leave america.

but I am of the belief as I've said here many times that our country will be destroyed more or less completely, and that this is god's plan.

all who've studied the bible and taken it seriously should agree with this statement - 'great is the mystery'.

Red Jones  posted on  2006-07-03   23:00:26 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#66. To: Red Jones (#65)

Hey Red, at least you're "getting" it ! He said if he didn't cut the time of the end short "not even a remnant would be saved" ... so only a remnant is expected to survive it.

But, he also said "they have persecuted me, and they will persecute you for my names sake". [But most Christians act like he never said it and act all freaked out if they're even persecuted a teeny bit].

No one has all of the answers, but living in some fake Jesus loves me because I'm special paradigm isn't gonna do anyone any good. He says that he isn't a respecter of persons, and Peter says something to the effect ... don't be so sure of your salvation because this is the same God that wouldn't bend down to lift the fallen angels up, who are higher than man.

Reductionism is man's attempt to comprehend the incomprehensible.

If ye love wealth greater than liberty, the tranquility of servitude greater than the animating contest for freedom, go home from us in peace. We seek not your counsel, nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds (smites) you; and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen.

Samuel Adams ... and I concur !

noone222  posted on  2006-07-03   23:14:51 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#67. To: AllTheKings'HorsesWontDoIt (#57)

I found that url that I was asking you for.

http://www .sweetliberty.org/issues/hoax/unionjack_epilogue.htm

about 2/3's down they have the cornwallis quote.

Red Jones  posted on  2006-07-03   23:15:07 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#68. To: noone222 (#66)

I am getting a lot of it, that's for sure.

I agree with you that so many of the pastors/ministers in the churches are just finding a pleasing message so that they can make money. they are careerists looking for a good paycheck. and I remember reading in revelation a verse that says they will be like this in the season of the end.

no one has all the answers, that's for sure.

Red Jones  posted on  2006-07-03   23:18:18 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#69. To: Red Jones, noone222, Arator, innieway, AllTheKings'HorsesWontDoIt, RickyJ (#68)

While you guys are chewing the fat over Biblical mysteries, I've got one to pose: some people point to a couple of verses in the Bible as evidence for the pre-Tribulation Rapture. But I've always been sort of skeptical; I think of it like this: look at all the faithful that were killed back in Biblical times for not renouncing their faith -- God didn't save them, why would he save us? Surely we can't be more holy or worthy than those people.

And some argue, "well that's true -- but the Tribulation is the wrath of God being poured out on the Earth, and why would he pour his wrath out on his own faithful?" To that I answer that everything that I can see that's about to happen is entirely the work of man, the interplay between crafty geniuses, greedy fools and the entirely mislead. We've already seen what happens when these people get control of a population(Bolsheviks). Now multiply that by a hundred and sprinkle it over the whole world. Looking at things that way, where is the need for God's wrath to reduce our populations to cinders?

You always hear these preachers saying that "when the Rapture comes, there will be complete anarchy -- moving, driverless cars running off the roads, pilotless airliners falling from the sky", etc. They tell us it will be an event all the Earth will know about, impossible to ignore, and that the talking heads will go on TV to lamely explain everything away. But I'm not so sure it would be like that at all. It occurs to me that with the current state of the Church, Wal-Mart Christians composed of Soccer Moms and Nascar Dads(stereotyping for simplicity), people that truthfully have more in common with Satanism than Christianity, maybe the event would pass almost entirely unnoticed.

Don't you think it's a little convenient for a group of powerful Satan-worshipping elites to have a target population who not only do not resist, but do not even get upset about the encroaching tyranny and genocide because they believe they are all going to be taken away soon? I spoke to a lady not long ago on the matter of America'a impending ruin and she only said something to the effect of "well, we won't be here much longer anyway." Can tyrant wannabees ask for any better attitude from complacent and dossile citizens? And then this, from http://www.apostolic.net/biblicalstudies/post/link2.htm:

"Paul’s point to the believers at Thessalonica is that they need not worry about their dead loved ones. Jesus will resurrect them when he returns. He says that this will take place at "the coming of the Lord." There is no hint that this is any different than the coming which everyone was expecting–the one that Jesus told his apostles would take place "after the tribulation" (Matt. 24:29). We would also expect that the eschatology Jesus taught them would be the same as what Paul was teaching, unless we have reason to believe differently. It is primarily this lack of evidence for multiple comings that is the basis for post-tribulationism. When it is realized that there is only one coming, post- is the only position. All agree that Christ is coming after the Tribulation, so if there is only one coming (or one stage of his coming as some prefer to call it), then the rapture must occur after the Tribulation."

And then, this:

"[5] This is a plain indication of God's righteous judgment so that you will be considered worthy of the kingdom of God, for which indeed you are suffering. [6] For after all it is only just for God to repay with affliction those who afflict you, [7] and to give relief to you who are afflicted and to us as well when the Lord Jesus will be revealed from heaven with His mighty angels in flaming fire, [8] dealing out retribution to those who do not know God and to those who do not obey the gospel of our Lord Jesus. [9] These will pay the penalty of eternal destruction, away from the presence of the Lord and from the glory of His power, [10] when He comes to be glorified in His saints on that day, and to be marveled at among all who have believed -- for our testimony to you was believed. [2 Thess. 1:5-10]"

I think the irony about pre-Tribulationists is that they often support things such as the rebuilding of the Temple and being supportive of massive wars to hasten the Second Coming, an event universally identified with a time of pain and suffering, and then go on about how they(the pre-Tribs) will be "caught up" out of harm's way to watch the horror inherent in the same event they have supposedly helped "bring about".

On the other hand, I've read some pretty convincing arguments from the pre-Tribulationists also, but it just somehow doesn't seem like real Christians would get a "get out of jail free" card on this one.

Perhaps I'm entirely mistaken about these things, I don't claim to be an expert on Scripture. Just sharing a few of my thoughts on the matter.

"When a well-packaged web of lies has been sold gradually to the masses over generations, the truth will seem utterly preposterous and its speaker a raving lunatic"

Nintendo of the Gods  posted on  2006-07-04   4:16:17 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#70. To: Nintendo of the Gods (#69)

I've got one to pose: some people point to a couple of verses in the Bible as evidence for the pre-Tribulation Rapture. But I've always been sort of skeptical; I think of it like this: look at all the faithful that were killed back in Biblical times for not renouncing their faith -- God didn't save them, why would he save us? Surely we can't be more holy or worthy than those people.

Your common sense matches the parable of the Wheat and Tares, which Christ likened to the last days. Pay particular attention to the explanation given to the disciples later, after the crowd had departed, starting at verse 36 ... Surely we can't be more holy or worthy than those people.

First Century followers of Christ were nearly completely wiped out by people like Paul, (Pharisees working behind the scenes as well with the Roman Government and replaced with Constantines Roman converts to a paganized imitation, actually Mithraism with a few name changes). Fed to lions, beaten to death by gladiators, put on the rack and hung on stakes ... Rome destroyed most of the original followers of truth, and they are going to do it again, right here in America. Rapture enthusiasts ignore the truth of the parable of the Wheat and Tares.

[1] The same day went Jesus out of the house, and sat by the sea side.

[2] And great multitudes were gathered together unto him, so that he went into a ship, and sat; and the whole multitude stood on the shore.

[3] And he spake many things unto them in parables, saying, Behold, a sower went forth to sow;

[4] And when he sowed, some seeds fell by the way side, and the fowls came and devoured them up:

[5] Some fell upon stony places, where they had not much earth: and forthwith they sprung up, because they had no deepness of earth:

[6] And when the sun was up, they were scorched; and because they had no root, they withered away.

[7] And some fell among thorns; and the thorns sprung up, and choked them:

[8] But other fell into good ground, and brought forth fruit, some an hundredfold, some sixtyfold, some thirtyfold.

[9] Who hath ears to hear, let him hear.

[10] And the disciples came, and said unto him, Why speakest thou unto them in parables?

[11] He answered and said unto them, Because it is given unto you to know the mysteries of the kingdom of heaven, but to them it is not given.

[12] For whosoever hath, to him shall be given, and he shall have more abundance: but whosoever hath not, from him shall be taken away even that he hath.

[13] Therefore speak I to them in parables: because they seeing see not; and hearing they hear not, neither do they understand.

[14] And in them is fulfilled the prophecy of Esaias, which saith, By hearing ye shall hear, and shall not understand; and seeing ye shall see, and shall not perceive:

[15] For this people's heart is waxed gross, and their ears are dull of hearing, and their eyes they have closed; lest at any time they should see with their eyes, and hear with their ears, and should understand with their heart, and should be converted, and I should heal them.

[16] But blessed are your eyes, for they see: and your ears, for they hear.

[17] For verily I say unto you, That many prophets and righteous men have desired to see those things which ye see, and have not seen them; and to hear those things which ye hear, and have not heard them.

[18] Hear ye therefore the parable of the sower.

[19] When any one heareth the word of the kingdom, and understandeth it not, then cometh the wicked one, and catcheth away that which was sown in his heart. This is he which received seed by the way side.

[20] But he that received the seed into stony places, the same is he that heareth the word, and anon with joy receiveth it;

[21] Yet hath he not root in himself, but dureth for a while: for when tribulation or persecution ariseth because of the word, by and by he is offended.

[22] He also that received seed among the thorns is he that heareth the word; and the care of this world, and the deceitfulness of riches, choke the word, and he becometh unfruitful.

[23] But he that received seed into the good ground is he that heareth the word, and understandeth it; which also beareth fruit, and bringeth forth, some an hundredfold, some sixty, some thirty.

[24] Another parable put he forth unto them, saying, The kingdom of heaven is likened unto a man which sowed good seed in his field:

[25] But while men slept, his enemy came and sowed tares among the wheat, and went his way.

[26] But when the blade was sprung up, and brought forth fruit, then appeared the tares also.

[27] So the servants of the householder came and said unto him, Sir, didst not thou sow good seed in thy field? from whence then hath it tares?

[28] He said unto them, An enemy hath done this. The servants said unto him, Wilt thou then that we go and gather them up?

[29] But he said, Nay; lest while ye gather up the tares, ye root up also the wheat with them.

[30] Let both grow together until the harvest: and in the time of harvest I will say to the reapers, Gather ye together first the tares, and bind them in bundles to burn them: but gather the wheat into my barn.

[31] Another parable put he forth unto them, saying, The kingdom of heaven is like to a grain of mustard seed, which a man took, and sowed in his field:

[32] Which indeed is the least of all seeds: but when it is grown, it is the greatest among herbs, and becometh a tree, so that the birds of the air come and lodge in the branches thereof.

[33] Another parable spake he unto them; The kingdom of heaven is like unto leaven, which a woman took, and hid in three measures of meal, till the whole was leavened.

[34] All these things spake Jesus unto the multitude in parables; and without a parable spake he not unto them:

[35] That it might be fulfilled which was spoken by the prophet, saying, I will open my mouth in parables; I will utter things which have been kept secret from the foundation of the world.

[36] Then Jesus sent the multitude away, and went into the house: and his disciples came unto him, saying, Declare unto us the parable of the tares of the field.

[37] He answered and said unto them, He that soweth the good seed is the Son of man;

[38] The field is the world; the good seed are the children of the kingdom; but the tares are the children of the wicked one;

[39] The enemy that sowed them is the devil; the harvest is the end of the world; and the reapers are the angels.

[40] As therefore the tares are gathered and burned in the fire; so shall it be in the end of this world.

[41] The Son of man shall send forth his angels, and they shall gather out of his kingdom all things that offend, and them which do iniquity;

[42] And shall cast them into a furnace of fire: there shall be wailing and gnashing of teeth.

[43] Then shall the righteous shine forth as the sun in the kingdom of their Father. Who hath ears to hear, let him hear.

[44] Again, the kingdom of heaven is like unto treasure hid in a field; the which when a man hath found, he hideth, and for joy thereof goeth and selleth all that he hath, and buyeth that field.

[45] Again, the kingdom of heaven is like unto a merchant man, seeking goodly pearls:

[46] Who, when he had found one pearl of great price, went and sold all that he had, and bought it.

[47] Again, the kingdom of heaven is like unto a net, that was cast into the sea, and gathered of every kind:

[48] Which, when it was full, they drew to shore, and sat down, and gathered the good into vessels, but cast the bad away.

[49] So shall it be at the end of the world: the angels shall come forth, and sever the wicked from among the just,

[50] And shall cast them into the furnace of fire: there shall be wailing and gnashing of teeth.

[51] Jesus saith unto them, Have ye understood all these things? They say unto him, Yea, Lord.

Read the above carefully, especially where it describes the Tares as being [of that wicked one]... modern theologians will tell you this is an allegory or has a spiritual meaning, when Christ was attempting to tell us that there are children of "that wicked one", Lucifer, walking amongst us.

And by the way, a tare is a weed that appears very similar to wheat until the time that the wheat gets a head of grain, harvest time.

I don't understand why we humans rebel against good advice. We treat our parents as if they have something against us when they try to keep us from harming ourselves, especially as teens. As adults we tend to rebel against the good advice of our heavenly Father ... and if we'd get smart and simply do those things as He has instructed and avoid those he warns against ... we wouldn't be susceptible to the wiles of the crime-ocracy. The thing I find exasperating is that everyone bitches about the hell we're suffering at the hands of the evil-archy, but continues to participate in all of their frauds, like Social Security, banking, credit, swearing oaths, wars etc.,

If ye love wealth greater than liberty, the tranquility of servitude greater than the animating contest for freedom, go home from us in peace. We seek not your counsel, nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds (smites) you; and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen.

Samuel Adams ... and I concur !

noone222  posted on  2006-07-04   6:37:14 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#71. To: Nintendo of the Gods (#69)

I myself don't go along with these people who think that one day soon christians will just be raptured out and then afterwards things will get really bad on earth. I think it's wishful thinking.

they have verses to support their view, but these verses are not specific enough to confirm their interpretation. to me these verses only speak of a dramatic separation coming in the future.

I can't point to any individual verses, but my recollections of what I read in bible are that when these horrible events come involving great warfare between nations where things will break down to the point where large numbers will wonder if they can survive it says specifically that his people are still among the people. that's my recollection.

and I think it's real curious like you said that these people who believe the rapture theology also have no concern that our leaders are evil. they seem to like evil leaders. it's a bit odd.

pre-tribulation, post-tribulation - it is a well-developed ideology made by the people is what it is. we don't know the future exactly. other than what the verses specifically say we just do not know. and we always have a problem with interpretation in that many people will interpret falsely.

Red Jones  posted on  2006-07-04   9:00:47 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#72. To: Arator (#60)

That's just it. They weren't. "that present day cult called Judaism" did not chrystalize until the rise of the Rabbis led by Rabbi Akiva who declared Bar Kochba to be Messiah in 132 AD, long after Paul wrote his letter to the Romans.

The scriptures says otherwise, and to me it is the final authority on this matter, and all matters for that matter. BTW, I wasn't talking about Juadism today, but at that time.

God is always good!
"It was an interesting day." - President Bush, recalling 9/11 [White House, 1/5/02] More and more of our imports come from overseas. - George W. Bush

RickyJ  posted on  2006-07-04   9:21:05 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#73. To: RickyJ (#72)

The scriptures says otherwise, and to me it is the final authority on this matter, and all matters for that matter. BTW, I wasn't talking about Juadism today, but at that time.

I have some questions for you about what the scriptures say.

Throughout his preaching in the diaspora, whenever Paul went to a new city, where did he go first to preach the gospel?

That's right, the local synagogues. Why? Because that's where the non-pagans were. That was the meeting place for both Jews and Gentile God fearers. That was the one refuge in a pagan world where the word of God was studied and heard. Just as Jesus attended synagogue in his life, so too did his followers.

And, those 10,000 Jewish believers in Yeshua in Jerusalem, did they cease being Jewish? Did believing in Yeshua for them mean rejecting Judaism or becoming something other than what they were? On the contrary, Paul, the apostles and Jewish believers generally remained Jewish to the core. The scriptures report that they went to synagogues, kept Torah and even performed Temple rites (see Acts 21). They believed in Yeshua as Messiah exactly because they were faithful Jews, as their Messiah was.

Was there intra-Jewish strife? Absolutely. Paul himself was a Pharisee who persecuted Jewish followers of Yeshua. But, neither the Pharisaical faction nor any other faction was preiminant or in any position to assert that they were the only permissible Judaism. The rise of the Pharisees to unchallenged preiminence did not begin until after 70AD, when the destruction of the Temple eliminated one of the Pharisee's most powerful rival factions, the priestly Sadducees. That left only the followers of Yeshua to challenge them. Finally, in 132 AD, when the Rabbis declared rebel leader Bar Kochba to be Messiah, it became impossible for Jewish believers in Yeshua to continue to attend synagogue. Until that time, Jewish believers in Yeshua remained one of many possible and contending Judaisms and did not separate from their brethren. Rather, they struggled with them in the hopes that all Jews might come to believe in Yeshua.

It is a mistake to read into intra-Jewish strife in the first century the schism that would not occur until a century later during the Bar Kochba revolt in 132AD. As has been the case throughout Jewish history up to that time, what it meant to be a faithful Jew was in contention among Jews. No side of the argument ceased to be Jewish as a result of their disagreements. It was an intra-family squabble with the real possibility at the time of Paul's writings that the followers of Yeshua might become the preiminent faction in Judaism. Why else do you think the other factions engaged them so fiercely?

Check out my blog, America, the Bushieful.

Arator  posted on  2006-07-04   10:17:58 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#74. To: Arator (#73)

Sorry, by and large those God fearing folks you describe were the ones that wanted Jesus killed. Jesus himself threw them out of the temple. The gospel was preached in the synagogues first primarily because it was a commandment from God that the gospel be preached first to the Jews and then to the Gentiles. Secondarily because they were indeed generally the most lost people of that time and in the most urgent need of hearing the truth, yet you describe them as God-fearing non-pagans. They were the worst of the worst; they made Romans seem good by comparison. Paul loved them first because they were God’s creation made in the image of man, secondly because they were his fellow brethren and because they were totally lost beyond almost all hope and he knew it. He knew that his fellow brethren were not likely to see Heaven, and it grieved his heart. So of course he would want to preach to them first.

Romans 13 was written to the Christians of Rome. Their rulers were certainly not Synagogue rulers. One could say their rulers were the Roman government and they were in secular nature, but in the nature Paul was probably talking about it was the elders of Christ’s church.

God is always good!
"It was an interesting day." - President Bush, recalling 9/11 [White House, 1/5/02] More and more of our imports come from overseas. - George W. Bush

RickyJ  posted on  2006-07-04   10:53:49 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#75. To: All (#74)

made in the image of God.

God is always good!
"It was an interesting day." - President Bush, recalling 9/11 [White House, 1/5/02] More and more of our imports come from overseas. - George W. Bush

RickyJ  posted on  2006-07-04   11:01:09 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#76. To: Red Jones (#6)

maybe the king was given certain authority, no more

If Scripture is your guide, then, yes, all authority belongs to God and a little bit of it is delegated. The civil authority (the kind) has the power to punish certain crimes but that's all.

Ada  posted on  2006-07-04   11:14:24 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#77. To: Arator (#32)

In the context of the Letter to the Romans, a letter addressed to new Gentile Christians still possessed of all manner of pagan baggage and much in need of instruction in the oracles of God,

The Romans Paul was addressing were all Jews, i.e, the Jewish congregation in Rome. They needed no instruction from Paul on Jewish law.

Ada  posted on  2006-07-04   11:39:00 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#78. To: Arator (#73)

Acs 21:17-18
And when we were come to Jerusalem, the brethren received us gladly. And the day following Paul went in with us unto James; and all the elders were present.

What elders do you think Paul is talking about here? IMO these were the type of rulers Paul was taking about in Romans 13.

Acts 20:17
And from Miletus he sent to Ephesus, and called the elders of the church.
Now read down to verse 28 of the same chapter and see how Paul describes them,
Acts 20:28
Take heed therefore unto yourselves, and to all the flock, over the which the Holy Ghost hath made you overseers, to feed the church of God, which he hath purchased with his own blood.
An overseer does have a postion of authority and is indeed a power ordained by God.

Now concerning Paul practicing the old-law of sacrifice: Paul did indeed keep the purifying laws, but the questoin is why did he do this when he knew and even proclaimed himself that the old-law of sacrafices were done away with?

Acts 21:26
Then Paul took the men, and the next day purifying himself with them entered into the temple, to signify the accomplishment of the days of purification, until that an offering should be offered for every one of them.
Paul said he would be all things to all people in order to possibly reach them for Jesus Christ. If it meant obeying laws that were no longer in effect, so be it.

God is always good!
"It was an interesting day." - President Bush, recalling 9/11 [White House, 1/5/02] More and more of our imports come from overseas. - George W. Bush

RickyJ  posted on  2006-07-04   12:29:55 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#79. To: All (#78)

An overseer does have a postion of authority and is indeed a power ordained by God.

Corection to the above:

An overseer does have a postion of authority and the elders talked about here are indeed a power ordained by God.

God is always good!
"It was an interesting day." - President Bush, recalling 9/11 [White House, 1/5/02] More and more of our imports come from overseas. - George W. Bush

RickyJ  posted on  2006-07-04   12:35:49 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#80. To: IndieTX (#31)

Thanks Indie...hope you had a great 4th.

Freedomsnotfree  posted on  2006-07-04   14:53:36 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#81. To: noone222, BTP Holdings, Red Jones, All (#58)

Christ himself stated that he didn't come to change the law, but to fulfill or establish it. He even went so far as to say that not a jot or tittle of the law would pass before heaven and earth passed away.

[Mat 5:18 For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled. ]

I was two hours into replying to your post, when I went to a google cache, and THEN to the original URL, which proceeded to crash my little computer. I tried it again, to see if it was just because I had too much stuff on it. Nope, it did it again. I lost everything. I have some things to do, but God Willing, I will be back to answer your post, point by point. I am a little slow, so in the meantime, would you please clarify for me, that you believe only the "white ten tribes of Israel" are true Israel, and that peoples of other nations, tribes, and tongues, like the Ethiopian are not? Because if this is what you believe, everything in me recoils at the thought. If this is the God you worship, it is no wonder so many people are turned off. If this is not the case, please forgive me, and I will not spend any more time on that particular issue.

The article that crashed my computer: I'd say it doesn't fit into someone's agenda, so I'd recommend everyone make a copy and spread it far and wide, particularly in Tim LaHaye territory. I agree with this, except that I believe God IS building His kingdom on earth [I will explain if anyone wants me to. One thought: Jesus said, My kingdom is not NOW of this world.]:

Global Elite Promoting ‘End Times’ Myth

Television gurus preaching a fraudulent “end times” and “last days” theory popularized in the 19th century are helping lay the groundwork for world government by corralling good Christians into supporting a doctrine that has no Biblical basis.

True Christian fundamentalism, based on the teachings of the Bible takes the Bible at its word and accepts that Christ accomplished all that he intended to do while on Earth and that His kingdom is here and is within you. That’s the powerful thesis put forth by John Anderson, producer of the video The Last Days. On Dec. 16, Anderson made a return appearance on Radio Free America (RFA), the weekly call-in talk forum sponsored by American Free Press with host Tom Valentine. (A transcript of Anderson’s first appearance on RFA was published in AFP’s issue No. 19.)

What follows is an edited transcript of the interview. Comments by Valentine are in boldface. Anderson’s responses are in regular text.

The person responsible for popularizing this clap-trap that the “end times” and “last days” are coming was a shady character named Cyrus I. Scofield.

That’s true, but Scofield was not the originator. Scofield got these false teachings from John Darby, who got it from Edward Irving and Margaret McDonald, a 14-year-old girl who had a dream and began writing letters to Irving describing what she thought was going to happen.

Darby was one of the Plymouth Brethren and when Scofield got hold of what Darby and others were teaching, he produced the Scofield Bible in 1909 and there have been many revisions of it since then. Although they never say “who” revised Scofield’s work.

Researchers have said that it was a powerful New York attorney, Samuel Untermyer, who was instrumental in arranging for the Oxford Press, which was controlled by the Rothschild banking family, patrons of the Zionist movement, to publish the Scofield “bible.”

Students of history recall that Untermyer, who was a major player in the Zionist movement, was the one who blackmailed President Woodrow Wilson with the love letters that Wilson sent to his mistress, a certain Mrs. Peck. The history of this sordid affair was described in The Barnes Review* in its March/April 2000 issue. In its January/ February 2001 issue, The Barnes Review described Untermyer’s famous “holy war” speech that helped launch World War II.

So many people today believe that the words of Scofield are the words of the scripture. I tell people that if you’ve got a Scofield “bible,” then throw it away.

Most people who call themselves Christians do not study and read God’s word for themselves or they allow their thinking to be influenced what they have been told based on the teachings of Scofield.

If you look at the Tim LaHaye series, Left Behind, he and his associate have each made some $10 million on this, playing on the fear and unknowing faith of the Christian public. Doom and gloom sells, but truth does not.

Thanks to the influence of Scofield and his sponsors, Untermyer and the Rothschild family, many Christians today believe that God promised a certain tract of land in the Middle East to the people we know today as Israelis.

You are referring to the promise that God made to Abraham. God keeps his word and he certainly did. In Joshua 21, verses 43-45, it says that the Lord God gave unto Israel all the land. So God did fulfill the promise that he made to Abraham.

But was the promise of this land to those known as the Hebrews a promise that this would be their land forever?

No, it was not. First of all, the old covenant between God and the Hebrews was conditional. Although God kept his word, there was nothing in that promise that it would be that way forever. The old covenant was conditional.

The key word is “if.” That is, if the Hebrews kept their part in their covenant with God. But all throughout scripture the prophets continue to predict that the Hebrews will break that covenant by disobeying God and that, eventually, they will lose it all.

And eventually, they did lose it all. This is what is important: it was never solely an ethnic issue as to who “Israel” was. The issue always had to do with those who had faith and believed in God.

For example, the United States is often referred to as a “Christian nation.” That does not mean that everyone in the United States is a Christian. But those who follow Christ by faith and by faith alone are of that spiritual seed.

In Numbers 9:14, if strangers came in and kept the ordinances and the males were circumcised, they were accepted as a part of Israel. So it was not that this exclusive, nationalistic issue that many people try to hang onto. Spiritual Israel was always the issue.

God said that Israel as a racial entity was going to be the one that the prophecies were made to and the messiah was going to come through. God divorced Israel but he did not divorce Judah, because the messiah had to come through Judah, as the prophecy was made in Genesis 49:10.

Remember the parable that Jesus used about wineskin? He said you did not put new wine into an old wineskin. The issue was that the new covenant was not going to be accepted by old covenant Israel.

That’s the key thing: people with power in this world refused to accept God’s prophecy and what He had brought about. You have people who call themselves “Christians” who believe that this “Israel” of today is still the Promised Land and that God’s promise is going on in perpetuity and that God has a hand in this modern-day political mess in the Middle East and that we have an “end times” coming. They suggest that Christ effectively failed and did not fulfill God’s plan.

That is exactly what dispensational theology teaches: The Jews rejected the kingdom and, as a result, it was put on hold. That’s utter nonsense. When they came to Christ and tried to make him king after He had fed the 5,000, he slipped away from them. He had not come to set up a physical kingdom. That was never His intent. It was always a spiritual kingdom with a spiritual people.

To expect Christ to return and rule over a literal kingdom is to believe that everything Christ did when he was here on Earth was a failure. How could the Son of God be a failure?

Correct. The people who are saying that Christ failed and has to return are suggesting that God was caught off guard and He had to come up with a “Plan B.” That’s absurd. Yet we still have many evangelical Christians believing this nonsense, thanks to Scofield.

The historical and Biblical truths about the destruction of Jerusalem are not something that is widely taught to Christians in America today. Christians are not taught that this was the fulfillment of God’s promise and was literally the hand of God Himself destroying the old order completely and totally.

Every Jew knew that the “Heaven and the Earth” was the temple. That’s what Jesus meant when He said that “Heaven and Earth” would pass but that His word would not pass. That is the prophecy of Isaiah 65: the New Jerusalem that came out of Heaven, the new “Heaven and Earth” that John spoke about in Revelation 21 when he said he saw a new Heaven and Earth and no more sea. What John was saying was that there was no more separation, no more exclusivity. Now God’s kingdom was open to all.

The destruction of Jerusalem and the physical destruction of the old temple by the Roman armies was a signal that God’s kingdom was now in place. Christ predicted in Matthew 24 what would happen, and the truth is that what happened in Jerusalem in the times of Titus—the Roman who destroyed Jerusalem—you cannot find anything else in history to match it for horrible events.

Christ said that the whole system that the Pharisees stood for was going to be destroyed. His disciples came to him on the Mount of Olives and asked, “When shall these things be?” Every one of them knew that there was going to be a new Heaven and Earth, a new age, a new covenant. Christ described to them all that would happen before it would transpire.

Today people say that we are living in “the last days” and the world is coming to an end, but in Luke 21 (which is parallel to Matthew 24 and Mark 13), Christ said, “Take heed that you be not deceived for many shall come in my name, saying, ‘I am Christ. The end draweth near.” He said you shall hear of wars and rumors of wars and then said that there would be wrath upon “this people.” That’s the key: he’s referring to the flesh-and-blood individuals he was talking to at that time. The issue in Luke 21 is that he said that only the apostles themselves would be able to say when the end had come. That means that anyone after them would be a false prophet if they were predicting the end times had come to Earth.

The prophecy of the destruction of Jerusalem was made to those people in that land, not to the whole world and that is another key to understanding all of this.

The people of Jerusalem practically ate each other. It was a horrendous end time in the most classic sense.

Josephus, the historian, even said that if Titus, the Roman, had not lifted his finger, the Jews of the time would have probably destroyed themselves from within. More than a million were killed and, at the end, only 100,000 were left. They went into captivity.

There is a well-known Christian columnist, Cal Thomas, who seems to believe that everything Israeli leader Ariel Sharon does is directed by God Himself.

That is the sentiment today: that everything Israel does is because it is ordained by God.

The original “Israel” was dissolved by God, and if you look at the world today from a correct Biblical sense, based upon what we have in the Bible, there is no such thing as a “Jew.”

The Jewish Encyclopedia itself says there is no such thing as a Jewish race. There is only a Jewish religion now and that is what came out of Babylon and had nothing to do with the Bible and its times.

Is today’s Judaism the religion of the tribe of Judah?

Predominantly today, yes. Under the years of Babylonian captivity they came up with the synagogue-type of Judaism that is being practiced today. When you start looking at the Jewish Talmud, you find things to tally contrary to God’s word, yet there are some today who say that “Christianity came out of Judaism,” and that is absurd. We are not a Judeo-Christian country. The United States started out as a Godly, Christian country. Not all of those who founded this country were Christian but at least the ideas of the Bible were incorporated into our nation by many of the Founding Fathers.

God had his prophets on the Earth and when Christ fulfilled the promise, the temple was gone and the old way of doing things was wiped out.

It was fulfilled. It’s amazing to me that there are those who don’t believe it. We say “trust in Jesus” and “take him at His word,” but many don’t.

Every single person has Jesus right there if he so chooses. It has nothing to do with race or sex or height or anything. God’s kingdom is within us.

It is open to any and all who believe in the finished work of Jesus Christ. H

* For information on ordering issues of The Barnes Review, call (877) 773-9077, email barnesrev@hotmail.com or write P.O. Box 15877, Washington, D.C. 20003.

URL SHOULD be: http://www.americanfreepress.net/RFA_Articles/Global_Elite_Promoting__En d_Ti/glo bal_elite_promoting__end_ti.html

noone222, after reading this, do you still want me to continue? I had about 28 Blueletterbible windows open to refute what you said, on one point alone. I'll be happy to pull them up again, if need be. I'm not trying to be cranky, but God is no racist, and I won't let him be construed as such.

I noticed http://historicist.com has/had this article. I did not check to see if it is still up.

BTP, is there something up with americanfreepress?

AllTheKings'HorsesWontDoIt  posted on  2006-07-04   15:00:39 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#82. To: AllTheKings'HorsesWontDoIt (#81)

BTP, is there something up with americanfreepress?

Nope. That is one of the subjects they have covered.

"To be nobody-but-yourself - in a world which is doing its best, night and day, to make you everybody else - means to fight the hardest battle which any human being can ever fight; and never stop fighting." E.E. Cummings

BTP Holdings  posted on  2006-07-04   16:53:42 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#83. To: noone222 (#58)

They promote inter-racial marriages which God forbid

I don't think God ever forbade this. Moses himself had a wife of a different race.

Those that say God loves everybody are full of shit. It just ain't so.

God says he loves everybody.

The Scripture that made me really think about finding the truth was one where Christ says at the Judgment there will be "many" that will say "but lord we healed the sick and cast out demons in your name" ... to which he will reply "DEPART FROM ME FOR I NEVER KNEW YOU" ... explain that !

That's easy to explain, without love nothing you do means anything. If you don't truly love God, then it matters not what you do. God knows people's hearts, without love, true love of God, there is no salvation.

God is always good!
"It was an interesting day." - President Bush, recalling 9/11 [White House, 1/5/02] More and more of our imports come from overseas. - George W. Bush

RickyJ  posted on  2006-07-04   16:57:33 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#84. To: RickyJ (#83)

They promote inter-racial marriages which God forbid

I don't think God ever forbade this. Moses himself had a wife of a different race.

I'm afraid he did!! Deuteronomy 7:1When the LORD thy God shall bring thee into the land whither thou goest to possess it, and hath cast out many nations before thee, the Hittites, and the Girgashites, and the Amorites, and the Canaanites, and the Perizzites, and the Hivites, and the Jebusites, seven nations greater and mightier than thou; 2And when the LORD thy God shall deliver them before thee; thou shalt smite them, and utterly destroy them; thou shalt make no covenant with them, nor shew mercy unto them: 3Neither shalt thou make marriages with them; thy daughter thou shalt not give unto his son, nor his daughter shalt thou take unto thy son.

And:Ezra 10:10 And Ezra the priest stood up, and said unto them, Ye have transgressed, and have taken strange wives, to increase the trespass of Israel.

God says he loves everybody.

Agian, not true!! Malachi 1:1The burden of the word of the LORD to Israel by Malachi. 2I have loved you, saith the LORD. Yet ye say, Wherein hast thou loved us? Was not Esau Jacob's brother? saith the LORD: yet I loved Jacob, 3And I hated Esau, and laid his mountains and his heritage waste for the dragons of the wilderness. 4Whereas Edom saith, We are impoverished, but we will return and build the desolate places; thus saith the LORD of hosts, They shall build, but I will throw down; and they shall call them, The border of wickedness, and, The people against whom the LORD hath indignation for ever.

That's easy to explain, without love nothing you do means anything.

So, since He said there would be MANY that He would tell to "Depart from me ye that work iniquity; for I never knew you" that means that there are many that are without love. I agree

I am not racist, purist, or any other thing which anyone may possibly construe out of my posts on this thread (which BTW has been an extremely good, thought provoking one!). BUT, the bottom line is (as pointed out by noone222) children of the Destroyer "The Wicked One" are walking among us!! And I personally think Bush - the whole line of them - and his cronies are among those children......

"This country has come to feel the same when congress is in session as when the baby gets hold of a hammer." Will Rogers..... "None can love freedom heartily but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license." John Milton.....

innieway  posted on  2006-07-04   17:37:03 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#85. To: AllTheKings'HorsesWontDoIt (#81)

God is no racist, and I won't let him be construed as such.

You have given some good responses to my posts and others on this thread. I'm taking what you have said and giving it more critical thought. BUT, I did notice that a large percentage of what you were quoting was from the writings of Paul. Again, I'm not totally convinced of the virtue of Paul. His writings seem to contradict the teachings of the entire rest of Scripture so often. I have often wondered if a large portion of his stuff was written from inspiration of Satan just to throw people off.... After all, it IS the goal of the Destroyer to take as many down with him as possible.......

Anyhow, as to the text that I chose to quote from you, isn't that being just a tad pretentious (I hope I'm using the right word here) to make ANY claim as to what the Creator is/isn't should/should not be/do? It's kinda like those that say "kill em all and let God sort em out". What qualifies ANY of us to see fit to give God a job to do????

"This country has come to feel the same when congress is in session as when the baby gets hold of a hammer." Will Rogers..... "None can love freedom heartily but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license." John Milton.....

innieway  posted on  2006-07-04   17:53:05 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#86. To: ALL (#0)

To all who may be more interested in reading more on the subject of Israel, and Jews - and I do mean a HUGE library of information try this link:

http://www.israelect.com/reference/Willie-Martin/was_index.html

At the top of this page is the whole Willie Martin archive. He has devoted more time to the subject than most of us could possibly conceive of doing

"This country has come to feel the same when congress is in session as when the baby gets hold of a hammer." Will Rogers..... "None can love freedom heartily but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license." John Milton.....

innieway  posted on  2006-07-04   17:57:01 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#87. To: BTP Holdings (#82)

No. I meant, when I linked to their URL, some strange site started to come up, and it shut me down. Twice. When I get a chance, I'll try their home page. My fear is someone may be messing with them, like they did with We Hold These Truths.

AllTheKings'HorsesWontDoIt  posted on  2006-07-04   18:32:44 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#88. To: innieway (#86)

At the top of this page is the whole Willie Martin archive.

Couldn't have said it better myself !

Matthew 7:6

If ye love wealth greater than liberty, the tranquility of servitude greater than the animating contest for freedom, go home from us in peace. We seek not your counsel, nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds (smites) you; and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen.

Samuel Adams ... and I concur !

noone222  posted on  2006-07-04   18:35:19 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#89. To: Red Jones (#65)

I am of the belief as I've said here many times that our country will be destroyed more or less completely, and that this is god's plan.

I'm afraid you're right Red. And not just our country either. And there is a very good reason for this. There simply isn't room for everyone here after the resurrection. You see, Heaven is right here on Earth. I know, that sounds kooky, but as you mentioned in the post I'm responding to that the Messiah is coming back HERE to establish His Kingdom.....

Here is a link to George Gordon... http://www.georgegordon.com/Radio_Archives.htm If you've never heard of him, do yourself a favor (and everyone else too) and give him a listen. He has a thing called the Law Hour, and all his shows are archived here. For the purposes of the topic on this thread, scroll down to August 2005 and listen to the shows titled "Scriptural View On Christianity" and "Is Heaven the Reward of the Saved?" A total of 7 hours of some of the most informative listening you'll find... I heard Alex Jones say once that the more he listens to Gordon, the more he finds himself in agreement with what he has to say.

Gordon also has MANY MANY topics that are worth listening to. Things about Social Security, Tax Protest, Bird Flu, The Lost Tribes of Israel, Identity Theft, the list goes on and on.....

Like you said, none of us has all the answers, BUT I feel there is no doubt that you are on the right track, and I think you'll enjoy Gordon's perspective. He puts up an argument that is almost impossible to contradict...

And check out the Willie Martin files I posted on this thread a bit ago. TONS AND TONS of exhausting research there that lays out a great deal of info on the topic of this thread.

"This country has come to feel the same when congress is in session as when the baby gets hold of a hammer." Will Rogers..... "None can love freedom heartily but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license." John Milton.....

innieway  posted on  2006-07-04   18:45:35 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  



      .
      .
      .

Comments (90 - 117) not displayed.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest