Freedom4um

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

War, War, War
See other War, War, War Articles

Title: The difference between rockets and missiles
Source: wikipedia
URL Source: http://wikipedia
Published: Aug 6, 2006
Author: me
Post Date: 2006-08-06 13:12:19 by Jethro Tull
Keywords: None
Views: 2094
Comments: 33

Katsuyha Rocket - Hezbollah

In military use, rockets generally use solid propellant and are unguided.

****
************

Guided missiles - Israel, by way of America

Missiles that have the ability to maneuver through the air can be guided, and are known as guided missiles. These have three key system components:

• tracking
• guidance
• flight

A tracking system locates the missile's target. This can be either a human gunner aiming a sight on the target (remotely from the missile) or an automatic tracker. Automatic trackers use radiation emanating from the target or emitted from the launch platform and reflecting back to it from the target. Passive automatic trackers use the target's inherent radiation, usually heat or light, but missiles designed to attack Command & Control posts, aircraft or guided missiles may look for radio waves. Active automatic trackers rely on the target being illuminated by radiation. The target can be "painted" with light (sometimes infrared and/or laser) or radio waves (radar) which can be detected by the missile. The radiation for the painting can originate in the missile itself or may come from a remote station (for example, a hilltop gunner can illuminate a target with a laser device and this can be used to direct an air launched guided missile).

A guidance system takes data from the missile's tracking system and flight system and computes a flight path for the missile designed to intercept the target. It produces commands for the flight system.

The flight system causes the missile to maneuver. There are two main systems: vectored thrust (for missiles that are powered throughout the guidance phase of their flight) and aerodynamic maneuvering (wings, fins, canards, etc).

There are some similarities between guided missiles and guided bombs. A guided bomb, dropped from an aircraft, is unpowered and uses aerodynamic fins for forward horizontal maneuvering while falling vertically.


Poster Comment:

The MSM hasn't bothered to explain the difference to the sheeple. As you can see the Israelis - thanks to the American taxpayer and military contractors - has the more effective weapon system. Subscribe to *Hasbarfa Alert*

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 21.

#5. To: Jethro Tull (#0)

What does the technical differentiation matter?

buckeroo  posted on  2006-08-06   14:08:05 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: buckeroo (#5)

What does the technical differentiation matter?

One is a sophisticated weapon, while the other is a bottle rocket on steroids. File the Israeli response under disproportionate response.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2006-08-06   14:32:44 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: Jethro Tull (#6)

One is a sophisticated weapon, while the other is a bottle rocket on steroids. File the Israeli response under disproportionate response.

You do realize that despite the obvious class of weaponry, it becomes annoying having relatively large and preponderant bottle rockets landing in the roof of your home, don't you? I mean that kind of unwelcomed event could mess up a baseball TV program while having a beer or two with friends and family.

buckeroo  posted on  2006-08-06   15:15:44 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: buckeroo (#9)

You do realize that despite the obvious class of weaponry, it becomes annoying having relatively large and preponderant bottle rockets landing in the roof of your home, don't you?

Not nearly enough Hezbollah bottle rockets have found their target. Had they, we wouldn't be exchanging posts. I'd be to busy celebrating.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2006-08-06   16:12:57 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: Jethro Tull (#10)

I'd be to busy celebrating.

What are you saying? That you wholeheartedly enjoin in the possible death and destruction of innocent people?

buckeroo  posted on  2006-08-06   16:19:29 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: buckeroo (#12)

No, not just the people. The entire nation.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2006-08-06   16:21:07 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: Jethro Tull (#14)

I see. You want to destroy a "people" so as to eliminate a nation to achieve some "concept" .. isn't that idea tantamount to genocide?

buckeroo  posted on  2006-08-06   16:40:44 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#20. To: buckeroo (#15)

isn't that idea tantamount to genocide?

Why no Buck, I'd prefer to call it sustainable peace

Jethro Tull  posted on  2006-08-06   19:09:11 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#21. To: Jethro Tull (#20)

Lobbing a rocket ... err ...missile ... err ... water bottle rocket ... is sustainable peace? Exactly how is this transaction performed? Are you saying a dud missile launched by Hezbollah landing in Northern Israel is akin to eating a turkey by all those free well wishers that believe in individual dignity? Good God! This might be cool from a viewpoint that goes nowhere I suppose. Yet, are you saying death & destruction has a lofty purpose when there is no principle behind the actions?

buckeroo  posted on  2006-08-06   20:50:28 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 21.

        There are no replies to Comment # 21.


End Trace Mode for Comment # 21.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest