4um: Goldi-Lox: I Was Very Disappointed With Him (aristeides)

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
Pious Perverts
See other Pious Perverts Articles
Title: Goldi-Lox: I Was Very Disappointed With Him (aristeides)
Source: ELPEE
URL Source: http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=157943#C20
Published: Sep 7, 2006
Author: Goldi-Lox
Post Date: 2006-09-07 19:57:01 by Brian S
Keywords: None
Views: 2202
Comments: 189

20. To: Badeye (#17) I warned him publicly at least twice, and by email NOT to post anything that was in Arabic, or linked to an Arabic language site. He said it was done accidently, and would not do it again. In the last article he posted, (I deleted the thread), when I went to the link, it was AGAIN to an Arabic language site. That was it. Done. I won't be lied to. LP cannot tolerate that. We are at war...like it or not. There is no way for me or others who cannot speak Arabic to know whether or not there are messages between terrorists going on, and I won't be a party to that. It's too dangerous for all of us. When I warn someone about an action, and spell out the reason why, and they do it again, I don't have any other choice but to cut off their posting rights. I think I acted on behalf of the posting community here. We can't be associated in any way with those who are terrorists. I think he was doing a disservice to the site, and our members. I was very disappointed with him. Goldi-Lox posted on 2006-09-07 14:34:17 ET Reply Trace
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 146.
#122. To: Brian S (#0)
Interesting that that article that I posted that led to my banning is still up there on LP, after somebody else posted it a few hours after I did: What Types of Gruesome Weapons Did Israel Use in Lebanon?.
The link to the original article on Uruknet appears not to be functioning now, but here's a summary Uruknet page that uses Arabic to the same limited extent that the original article page did: uruknet.info.

aristeides posted on 2006-09-08 10:01:57 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#145. To: aristeides (#122)
Interesting.
I looked through most of the postings she made to you in recent times and saw nothing by way of warning. The closest thing to this mention is a response about the guy who rebroadcast Hezzbollah news and was arrested for it by DHS, wherein she mentions the possibility of some code being sent in the rebroadcast (but which had nothing to do with LP posted content). Maybe it's there and I missed it but from what she wrote to you it seems she was generally irritated over your postings that were unfavorable to Israel.
All considered, it seems she didn't like you on the site because you were making Israel look bad and she invented this reason to ban you. I'm sure she really believes what she says though -- it's probably a psychological thing with her wanting to have a reason to ban you. She's probably wanted that for a while.
But one benefit of a doubt I might suggest: If she emailed something to you and you've been a member for years, she may have used an outdated email address.
But that obviously wouldn't explain your supposed response.

Neil McIver posted on 2006-09-08 13:23:30 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#146. To: Neil McIver (#145)
The closest thing to this mention is a response about the guy who rebroadcast Hezzbollah news and was arrested for it by DHS, wherein she mentions the possibility of some code being sent in the rebroadcast (but which had nothing to do with LP posted content)

She posted that a minute before she banned me (and right after I had posted the "Gruesome Weapons" piece), so it obviously didn't have time to be an effective warning in any case.

aristeides posted on 2006-09-08 13:28:08 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
Replies to Comment # 146.
#147. To: aristeides (#146) (Edited)
Well, there's absolutely nothing in that post that even hints that she was upset with you. Her comment is obviously directed exclusively at the guy who was arrested, and the thread remains up.
As for terrorists passing coded messages, they could do it in English as well as any other language. It's quite silly to hold that kind of concern over Arabic lettering, and use of overt messages in Arabic news reports would easily attract the attention of any government.
Such concern is rabid paranoia, and --my guess-- just an excuse to block sources that are likely to be/usually are critical of Israel.

Neil McIver posted on 2006-09-08 14:07:59 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
End Trace Mode for Comment # 146.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest

Freedom4um