[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Tucker Carlson: This current White House is being run by Satan, not human beings

U.S. Submarines Are Getting a Nuclear Cruise Missile Strike Capability: Destroyers Likely to Follow

Anti-Gun Cat Lady ATTACKS Congress Over Mexico & The UN!

Trump's new border czar will prioritize finding 300,000 missing migrant children who could be trafficking victims

Morgan Stanley: "If Musk Is Successful In Streamlining Government, It Would Broaden Earnings Growth And Stock Performance"

Bombshell Fauci Documentary Nails The Whole COVID Charade

TRUTH About John McCain's Service - Forgotten History

Bombshell Fauci Documentary Nails The Whole COVID Charade

Joe Rogan expressed deep concern that Joe Biden and Ukrainian President Zelensky will start World War III

Fury in Memphis after attempted murder suspect who ambushed FedEx employee walks free without bail

Tehran preparing for attack against Israel: Ayatollah Khamenei's aide

Huge shortage plagues Israeli army as losses mount in Lebanon, Gaza

Researchers Find Unknown Chemical In Drinking Water Posing "Potential Human Health Concern"

Putin visibly ‘shocked’ by US green-light for long-range missiles to strike inside Russia

The Problem of the Bitcoin Billionaires

Biden: “We’re leaving America in a better place today than when we came into office four years ago … "

Candace Owens: Gaetz out, Bondi in. There's more to this than you think.

OMG!!! Could Jill Biden Be Any MORE Embarrassing??? - Anyone NOTICE This???

Sudden death COVID vaccine paper published, then censored, by The Lancet now republished with peer review

Russian children returned from Syria

Donald Trump Indirectly Exposes the Jewish Neocons Behind Joe Biden's Nuclear War

Key European NATO Bases in Reach of Russia's Oreshnik Hypersonic Missile

Supervolcano Alert in Europe: Phlegraean Fields Activity Sparks Scientists Attention (Mass Starvation)

France reacted to the words of a US senator on sanctions against allies

Trump nominates former Soros executive for Treasury chief

SCOTUS asked to review if Illinois can keep counting mail-in ballots 2 weeks after election day

The Real Reason Government Workers Are Panicking About ElonÂ’s New Tracking System

THEY DON'T CARE ANYMORE!

Young Americans Are Turning Off The TV

Taxpayer Funded Censorship: How Government Is Using Your Tax Dollars To Silence Your Voice


National News
See other National News Articles

Title: INCREDIBLE! FOX 'NEWS' LABELS FOLEY AS DEM DURING O'REILLY FACTOR!
Source: The Brad Blog
URL Source: http://www.bradblog.com/?p=3570
Published: Oct 4, 2006
Author: Brad Friedman
Post Date: 2006-10-04 10:32:08 by MUDDOG
Keywords: None
Views: 573
Comments: 31

Three Different Video Cutaways, 15 Seconds or More Each, Credit Disgraced REPUBLICAN Congressman as Being a Florida DEMOCRAT!

UPDATED: NOW WITH VIDEO! LATER UPDATE: 'Erroneous' Caption Scrubbed from Late-night O'Reilly Rebroadcasts Without Explanation!

Just amazing. Fox's O'Reilly Factor just covered the Mark Foley (R-FL) issue in two different segments, one of them with a page who says he received communications from Foley, and another with Ann Coulter.

Never mind the content of either segment for now. Incredibly, during a total of three different cutaways to video footage of Foley, he was labelled at the bottom of the screen eachtime as "(D-FL)" !

Three different times. In two different segements. Each cutaway about 15 seconds or more. Showing Foley as a DEMOCRAT. Amazing.

Just an accident? We report, you decide.

UPDATE 11:30pm PT: Though we didn't see the first evening rerun, several folks have reported that Fox "News" scrubbed the "error" by running the video during the late-night rerun of O'Reilly with no text on the bottom of the screen during those sequences. Also, please note we originally had the date of 6/3/06 on the screenshot above, instead of the correct 10/3/06. Once we noticed, we had so many folks linking up to this item, we couldn't get back in to the site at all to make the correction until now!

UPDATE 10/4/06 2:04am PT: Confirmed! We just watched the second late-night rerun of O'Reilly, and indeed, the evidence goes down the memory hole as Fox removed the mis-labelled chiron entirely from their later broadcasts without explanation! BTW, we watched both full segments this time, including the one with Florida's own alleged Queen of Voter Fraud, Ann Coulter who swears up and down that Hastert just couldn't have known anything about Foley's problem, he just couldn't have!

Screenshot from the rebroadcast, where the "(D-FL)" has been excised from all three video cutaways, is below.

(2 images)

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: MUDDOG (#0)

Three Different Video Cutaways, 15 Seconds or More Each,

Just a technical error...(wink wink nod)

Cynicom  posted on  2006-10-04   10:34:41 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: MUDDOG (#0)

Is this how you spell subliminal?

Jethro Tull  posted on  2006-10-04   10:38:31 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: MUDDOG (#0)

Just an accident? We report, you decide.

Incredible. And some sheeple who saw that still think Foley is a (D-FL).

"If there’s another 9/11 or a major war in the Middle-East involving a U.S. attack on Iran, I have no doubt that there will be, the day after or within days an equivalent of a Reichstag fire decree that will involve massive detentions in this country."

- Daniel Ellsberg Author, Pentagon Papers

robin  posted on  2006-10-04   10:43:43 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: Cynicom (#1)

Just a technical error...(wink wink nod)

I wonder if O'Reilly will issue a correction tonight.


I've already said too much.

MUDDOG  posted on  2006-10-04   10:47:19 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: MUDDOG (#4)

I wonder if O'Reilly will issue a correction tonight.

I suspect he will. Not that he wants to, but he will make a correction.

Cynicom  posted on  2006-10-04   10:49:18 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: Jethro Tull (#2)

Is this how you spell subliminal?

You - will - vote - Republican.


I've already said too much.

MUDDOG  posted on  2006-10-04   10:50:31 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: robin (#3)

And some sheeple who saw that still think Foley is a (D-FL).

Remember that FR thread (referenced on 4um) where one of the posters thought Foley was a Democrat.


I've already said too much.

MUDDOG  posted on  2006-10-04   10:52:18 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: MUDDOG (#7)

Remember that FR thread (referenced on 4um) where one of the posters thought Foley was a Democrat.

Some people on FR were expressing honest opinions about Foley/Hastert.

I hear RNC will cut RimJobs allowance.

Cynicom  posted on  2006-10-04   10:55:59 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: MUDDOG (#0)

Since the story about Hastert's post being threatened and so on makes no sense if Foley is a Democrat, this will just make it clear to all but the densest viewers of Fox News that it lies.

Katrina was America's Chernobyl.

aristeides  posted on  2006-10-04   10:56:21 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: MUDDOG (#0)

The networks and newspapers play this game all the time, and this is just another example of our CFR-dominated media influencing our way of thinking.

Remember...G-d saved more animals than people on the ark. www.siameserescue.org

who knows what evil  posted on  2006-10-04   10:57:48 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: Cynicom (#8)

I hear RNC will cut RimJobs allowance.

LOL! There goes the RV.


I've already said too much.

MUDDOG  posted on  2006-10-04   10:57:53 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: aristeides (#9)

this will just make it clear to all but the densest viewers of Fox News that it lies.

Indeed, Fox News has been losing viewers.


I've already said too much.

MUDDOG  posted on  2006-10-04   10:58:51 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: who knows what evil (#10)

The networks and newspapers play this game all the time

No doubt. Just that this Foley (D-FL) is more egregious than most.


I've already said too much.

MUDDOG  posted on  2006-10-04   11:00:47 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: MUDDOG (#12)

Indeed, Fox News has been losing viewers.

Owner Murdoch has been a recent large donor to Hillary.

Even the sheep now and again see the truth.

Cynicom  posted on  2006-10-04   11:01:19 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: Cynicom (#14)

Even the sheep now and again see the truth.

And that's what makes the Foley issue such a problem for the GOP.


I've already said too much.

MUDDOG  posted on  2006-10-04   11:04:24 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: MUDDOG (#15)

And that's what makes the Foley issue such a problem for the GOP.

Will Rogers said he never met a man he didnt like, well,

I never met a politician I liked.

Cynicom  posted on  2006-10-04   11:07:16 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#17. To: aristeides (#9)

...this will just make it clear to all but the densest viewers of Fox News that it lies.

Perhaps Bill will offer this explanation:

When David Duke tried to run for either US Senator or some higher office the Democratic machine refused to let him. He went to court because he has always been a lifelong Dem (as were most Southern Triple K Klub members during their heyday) and the court ruled against him. If the party says he ain't a Dem, then he ain't a Dem.

So, since Foley was caught licking his chopz while chasing chickens, well, he ain't a PUB and never was.

So let it be written, so let it be done.

Watch and see if O'Reilly doesn't say that Foley was a RINO, a deep cover assignment to bring the honorable Pubs into disrepute.

And, the good people who watch his show religiously will breathe a collective sigh of relief, and go on pretending that Pubs aint really closeted chickenhawks.

Now if Bush gets nailed, then they'll say that NAMBLA is right and it's time to take off the masks and admit that there's nothing wrong with "sex before 8 or it's 2 late!"

Bush is never wrong, and he's GAWD's man in The White House, so, it's will be time for a paradign shift in the morals of the nation.

HOUNDDAWG  posted on  2006-10-04   11:11:54 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: Cynicom (#8)

Some people on FR were expressing honest opinions about Foley/Hastert.

I saw that Cyni, but come Nov., they'll *all* line up and vote for the R - it's the failed lesser of two evils strategy.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2006-10-04   11:35:11 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: aristeides (#9)

this will just make it clear to all but the densest viewers of Fox News that it lies.

I'm fairly certain that the "densest viewers" is who that label was aimed at.

the law, in its majestic equality, forbids the rich as well as the poor to sleep under bridges, beg in the streets and steal bread.

bluedogtxn  posted on  2006-10-04   11:47:05 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#20. To: Jethro Tull (#18)

I saw that Cyni, but come Nov., they'll *all* line up and vote for the R - it's the failed lesser of two evils strategy.

Only one reason I will vote this Nov.

The only statewide vote will be AGAINST Santorum.

Just a revenge vote, but what the heck, I wanna see him looking for work.

Cynicom  posted on  2006-10-04   12:04:18 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#21. To: Jethro Tull (#18)

Cynicom: Some people on FR were expressing honest opinions about Foley/Hastert.

Jethro Tull: I saw that Cyni, but come Nov., they'll *all* line up and vote for the R - it's the failed lesser of two evils strategy.

JT, I'm not so sure about that. Maybe the fundie Bible thumpers and the IsraeliFirsters may still vote GOP because of of the reason you cite.

But moderate family oriented GOP/Dem voters may be totally turned off with what the Foley scandal has brought to public view.

Keep in mind that Rove and GWB managed to draw in those "moderates" of both parties in the previous Presidential election because those voters were voting "no" to the Gay agenda, that had been by and large associated with the Democrat Party.

But with Foley and other related revelations about the GOP having a closet persuation those moderate family oriented voters may get pissed for being hood winked by the so called "family values" party. Rove's strategy was successful in "capturing" the moderates of both parties to come out and vote GOP. The GOP cannot afford to have the moderates sit at home or vote Democrat out of spite.

The ChristoZio fundies do not have the numbers to be able to carry the GOP without help from family oriented GOP/Dem moderates.

scrapper2  posted on  2006-10-04   12:05:27 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#22. To: Jethro Tull (#18)

it's the failed lesser of two evils strategy.

What do the Republicans have to do to make their partisans see that they are not the lesser of the two evils?

Katrina was America's Chernobyl.

aristeides  posted on  2006-10-04   12:08:11 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#23. To: MUDDOG (#4)

I wonder if O'Reilly will issue a correction tonight.

If O'Reilly doesn't perhaps the human ippecac, Sean Hannity, will.

In 1947, the UN created a perpetual war and named it Israel.

wbales  posted on  2006-10-04   12:19:02 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#24. To: scrapper2 (#21)

I wonder about your assessment.........recall the gopers had an out in the open acknowledged queer speak at their convention.......jim kolbe, az. That didn't seem to phase anyone.....nor did the fact that bush, hastert, hyde, quayle, and others didn't want the Lambert resolution for the gop platform adopted because they were willling to give money to candidates supporting baby killers than to take a stand against abortion.

Power players have the morals of an alley cat *excuse me all toms for the comparison*; their principles consist of finger licking wind waving. The sheeple wimmen look at whose got the cutest ass in a pair of tight jeans and they're not threatened by queers. Wimmen are the majority voters.

rowdee  posted on  2006-10-04   12:22:04 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#25. To: scrapper2 (#21)

JT, I'm not so sure about that. Maybe the fundie Bible thumpers and the IsraeliFirsters may still vote GOP because of of the reason you cite.

But moderate family oriented GOP/Dem voters may be totally turned off with what the Foley scandal has brought to public view.

It doesn't matter who votes. What matters is who counts the votes.

The GOP will hold both houses by slim majorities, and it doesn't matter what votes you actually cast.

the law, in its majestic equality, forbids the rich as well as the poor to sleep under bridges, beg in the streets and steal bread.

bluedogtxn  posted on  2006-10-04   12:43:32 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#26. To: wbales (#23)

the human ippecac, Sean Hannity

LOL

the law, in its majestic equality, forbids the rich as well as the poor to sleep under bridges, beg in the streets and steal bread.

bluedogtxn  posted on  2006-10-04   12:44:38 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#27. To: Cynicom (#20)

Just a revenge vote, but what the heck, I wanna see him looking for work.

They always get a raise and a promotion; prepare yourself.

"If there’s another 9/11 or a major war in the Middle-East involving a U.S. attack on Iran, I have no doubt that there will be, the day after or within days an equivalent of a Reichstag fire decree that will involve massive detentions in this country."

- Daniel Ellsberg Author, Pentagon Papers

robin  posted on  2006-10-04   12:58:16 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#28. To: robin (#27)

They always get a raise and a promotion; prepare yourself.

I know...

One plus however, he will no longer be the "HONORABLE SENATOR" Santorum and that is what he loves the most.

Power and position is an elixir to such people.

Cynicom  posted on  2006-10-04   13:02:59 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#29. To: rowdee (#24)

I wonder about your assessment.........recall the gopers had an out in the open acknowledged queer speak at their convention.......jim kolbe, az.

The sheeple wimmen look at whose got the cutest ass in a pair of tight jeans and they're not threatened by queers. Wimmen are the majority voters.

It was widely acknowledged before and after the 2004 Presidential election that Karl Rove used the general public's (women included) 2-1 antithapy to gay marriage as a wedge to get moderates to vote for Bush. Consider that prior to the 2004 election there were high profile Democrats ( Gavin Newsom) and Democrat ruled states (MA.) flaunting their party's support of gay marriage and getting lots of press coverage at that.

In Ohio ( swing state) even black and blue collar voters ( normally Democrat voters) were unhappy with the association of Kerry and the Democrat Party with the gay lobby.

But now the "family values" GOP party has lost a significant wedge issue that helped win over moderate voters ( both GOP and Dem and both genders)in the 2004 election. The Foley scandal hurts the GOP in a number of ways - not only the obvious hypocrasy of closet gays living duplitious lives for political expediency but the fact that this issue involves allegations of child molestation and cover up.

Some cut and paste from the following article:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A35437- 2004Nov8.html

"Moderates, Not Moralists" By E. J. Dionne Jr. 11/09/04

John Kerry was not defeated by the religious right. He was beaten by moderates who went -- reluctantly in many cases -- for President Bush. This will be hard for many Democrats to take. It's easier to salve those wounds by demonizing religious conservatives. But in the 2004 election, Democrats left votes on the table that could have created a Kerry majority.

Consider these findings from the network exit polls: About 38 percent of those who thought abortion should be legal in most cases went to Bush. Bush got 22 percent from voters who favored gay marriage and 52 percent among those who favor civil unions. Bush even managed 16 percent among voters who thought the president paid more attention to the interests of large corporations than to those of "ordinary Americans." A third of the voters who favored a government more active in solving problems went to Bush.

True, 22 percent of the voters said that "moral values" were decisive in their choices. But 71 percent picked some other issue. All this means that Bush won not because there is a right-wing majority in the United States but because the president persuaded just enough of the nonconservative majority to go his way. Even with their increased numbers, conservatives still constitute only 34 percent of the electorate. The largest share of the American electorate (45 percent) calls itself moderate. The moderates went 54 to 45 percent for Kerry, good but not enough. And 21 percent of this year's voters -- bless them -- called themselves liberal...

scrapper2  posted on  2006-10-04   13:50:25 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#30. To: wbales (#23)

the human ippecac, Sean Hannity

Good description.


I've already said too much.

MUDDOG  posted on  2006-10-04   14:10:15 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#31. To: MUDDOG (#0)

BTTT

Press 1 for English, Press 2 for English, Press 3 for deportation

Uncle Bill  posted on  2006-10-05   21:47:12 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]