Freedom4um

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

9/11
See other 9/11 Articles

Title: 9/11 Truth: FEMA & NIST's "Pancake Theory" is a Lie
Source: http://www.youtube.com
URL Source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6pn4ltRSTF8
Published: Oct 11, 2006
Author: DVD at improbablecollapse.com
Post Date: 2007-02-18 13:47:51 by robin
Ping List: *9-11*     Subscribe to *9-11*
Keywords: None
Views: 271
Comments: 3

The liars at FEMA and NIST (which are agencies of the U.S. federal government, and therefore are both on the Bush Administration's payroll) were given the task of explaining to the world how two 110-floor office buildings could shred themselves to dust in 10 seconds. The best they could do was the unscientific, idiotic garbage known as the "pancake theory", which is completely insufficient to explain what happened to those buildings.

This is a clip from "Improbable Collapse". Get the DVD at http://improbablecollapse.com


Poster Comment:



Recent related thread:

9/11 Truth: NOVA's "Pancake Theory" Simulation Debunked
posted 6 days ago by honway Subscribe to *9-11*

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: robin (#0)

The Column Failure Theory, by NIST is held up as the definitive explanation and has now REPLACED FEMA's Pancake theory. Both are variants on the Progressive Collapse theory.

Blames collapses on series of alleged events:

* Stripping of insulation by plane crashes

* Sagging of floors

* Bowing of columns

* Column instability transmitted by hat truss

http://screwloosechange.blogspot.com/2007/01/9-11-denial-as-multi-level- marketing.html

"The desire to rule is the mother of heresies." -- St. John Chrysostom

Destro  posted on  2007-02-18   17:57:51 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Destro (#1)

Blames collapses on series of alleged events:

* Stripping of insulation by plane crashes

* Sagging of floors

* Bowing of columns

* Column instability transmitted by hat truss

They changed their mind?!?! Hahahaha!!!

http://freedom4um.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=46094

9/11: Does this look like "structural failure" to you?

9/11 Truth: Fires Could Not Have Shredded the WTC to Dust

BYU physics professor Dr. Steven Jones, as well as Kevin Ryan of Underwriters Laboratories (the company that certified the steel used to construct the WTC), along with Aaron Swirsky, who was one of the 14 WTC Architects, Jim Hoffman of wtc7.net, and Dr. David Ray Griffin, explain why "fire melted the steel" is completely insufficient to explain the complete destruction of the World Trade Center towers.
This is a clip from "Improbable Collapse". Get the DVD at improbablecollapse.com

9/11 Truth: Firefighters Describe the Controlled Demolitions

David Ray Griffin reads dozens of oral histories where firefighters describe the controlled demolitions of the WTC towers. These histories were recorded immediately after 9/11, but the government would not release them until a Judicial Watch court case forced them too. Also: Steven Jones on WTC7.
This is a clip from "Improbable Collapse". Get the DVD at improbablecollapse.com

9/11 Truth: Structural Failures vs. Controlled Demolitions

Clip from 9/11 Mysteries: Compare and contrast what buildings look like when they collapse because a few joints weaken and break (which is the U.S. government's explanation for the WTC collapse) vs. what buildings look like when they are taken down with explosives in controlled demolitions.

Victory means exit strategy, and it’s important for the President to explain to us what the exit strategy is. ~George W. Bush
(About the quote: Speaking on the war in Kosovo.)

robin  posted on  2007-02-18   18:24:51 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: robin (#2)

They changed their mind?!?! Hahahaha!!!

Not really - but close.

"The desire to rule is the mother of heresies." -- St. John Chrysostom

Destro  posted on  2007-02-18   19:47:29 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest