Freedom4um

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

9/11
See other 9/11 Articles

Title: 9/11 Truth: Steven Jones on WTC 7 and Controlled Demolition
Source: 9/11 Truth conference
URL Source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7pJQ2yZfTY0
Published: Feb 20, 2007
Author: Steven Jones
Post Date: 2007-02-20 00:41:08 by robin
Ping List: *9-11*     Subscribe to *9-11*
Keywords: None
Views: 13582
Comments: 230

From Halifaxion

Steven Jones speaks at the Chicago 9/11 Steven Jones speaks at the Chicago 9/11 Truth conference (June 2006) about World Trade Center Building 7 and the case for controlled demolition of all three towers. This is just ten minutes from a longer lecture that you can find in its entirety on Google Video here:

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=2436472348579687382

Subscribe to *9-11*

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 38.

#3. To: robin, ALL (#0)

I've decided this should be posted on any 9/11 conspiracy thread that suggests something other than planes caused the WTC and Pentagon damage:

BeAChooser  posted on  2007-02-20   14:16:34 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: BeAChooser (#3)

I'm just curious.

Do you have a low intellect, like to be a troll or do you get paid for your dellusions.

intotheabyss  posted on  2007-02-20   14:19:05 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: intotheabyss (#4)

Do you have a low intellect, like to be a troll or do you get paid for your dellusions.

I vote for all three.

angle  posted on  2007-02-20   15:12:34 ET  (1 image) Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: angle (#15)

I think you are right.

He apparently just likes attention (negative or possitive). Because if he is a shill his job is hopeless here.

intotheabyss  posted on  2007-02-20   15:16:43 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#22. To: intotheabyss, ALL (#18)

Since you obviously know so much about Steven Jones and WTC 7 ...

http://www.debunking911.com/WTC7.htm

http://www.911myths.com/WTC7_Lies.pdf

http://www.911myths.com/html/wtc7_fire.html

http://screwloosechange.blogspot.com/2006/06/wtc-7.html

BeAChooser  posted on  2007-02-20   15:31:29 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#25. To: BeAChooser, christine, Jethro Tull, angle, robin, lodwick (#22)

http://www.patriotsquestion911.com/

I thought you might like to see an extensive list of "kooks" who don't believe the official story.

It doesn’t fit your job description to check this stuff out but other on this site might really enjoy this excellent sit.

intotheabyss  posted on  2007-02-20   15:40:40 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#32. To: intotheabyss, ALL (#25)

I thought you might like to see an extensive list of "kooks" who don't believe the official story.

Are ANY of them structural engineers; demolition experts; experts in steel, fire, concrete or impact; seismologists; or macro-world physicists?

Because Steven Jones certainly isn't.

BeAChooser  posted on  2007-02-20   22:24:41 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#33. To: BeAChooser (#32)

It only takes a little logic and commonsense.


David L. Griscom, PhD
– Research physicist, retired in 2001 from Naval Research Laboratory (NRL) in Washington, DC, after 33 years service. Fellow of the American Physical Society. Fulbright-García Robles Fellow at Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México in Mexico City (1997). Visiting professorships of research at the Universities of Paris and Saint-Etienne, France, and Tokyo Institute of Technology (2000 - 2003). Adjunct Professor of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Arizona (2004 - 2005). Winner of the 1993 N.F. Mott Award sponsored by the Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids, the 1995 Otto Schott Award offered by the Carl-Zeiss-Stiftung (Germany), a 1996 Outstanding Graduate School Alumnus Award at Brown University, and the 1997 Sigma Xi Pure Science Award at NRL. Principal author of 109 of his 185 published works, a body of work which is highly cited by his peers. Officially credited with largest number of papers (5) by any author on list of 100 most cited articles authored at NRL between 1973 and 1988.

  • Personal blog 1/5/07: "David Ray Griffin has web-published a splendid, highly footnoted account of The Destruction of the World Trade Center: Why the Official Account Cannot Be True: This scholarly work, rich in eyewitness accounts, includes 11 separate pieces of evidence that the World Trade Center towers 1, 2, and 7 were brought down by explosives.


    ... I implore my fellow physicists and engineers who may have the time, expertise, and (ideally) supercomputer access to get to work on the physics of the World Trade Center collapses and publish their findings in refereed journals like, say, the Journal of Applied Physics.

    The issue of knowing who was really behind the 9/11 attacks is of paramount importance to the future of our country, because the “official” assumption that it was the work of 19 Arab amateurs (1) does not match the available facts and (2) has led directly to the deplorable Patriot Act, the illegal Iraq war, NSA spying on ordinary Americans, repudiation of the Geneva Conventions, and the repeal of habeas corpus (a fundamental point of law that has been with us since the signing of the Magna Carta in 1215).

    Surely these Orwellian consequences of public ignorance constitute more than sufficient motivation for any patriotic American physicist or engineer to join the search for 9/11 Truth!" http://impactglassman



  • Member: Scholars for 9/11 Truth Association Statement: "Research proves the current administration has been dishonest about what happened in New York and Washington, D.C. The World Trade Center was almost certainly brought down by controlled demolitions and that the available relevant evidence casts grave doubt on the government's official story about the attack on the Pentagon."


  • Bio: http://impactglassman.blogspot.com/

    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------


    Heikki Kurttila, PhD
    – Safety Engineer and Accident Analyst, National Safety Technology Authority (TUKES), Finland.

    • Analysis of the collapse of WTC Buidling 7, 11/18/05: "Conclusion: The observed collapse time of WTC 7 [570 feet tall, 47 stories, and not hit by an airplane] was 6.5 seconds. That is only half a second longer than it would have taken for the top of the building to fall to the ground in a vacuum, and half a second shorter than the falling time of an apple when air resistance is taken into account. ... The great speed of the collapse and the low value of the resistance factor strongly suggest controlled demolition." http://www.saunalahti.fi

      ----------------------------------------------------------------------------

      Col. Robert Bowman, PhD, U.S. Air Force (ret) – Director of Advanced Space Programs Development under Presidents Ford and Carter. U.S. Air Force fighter pilot with over 100 combat missions. (PhD in Aeronautics and Nuclear Engineering, Cal Tech).

      • Video 9/11/04: "A lot of these pieces of information, taken together, prove that the official story, the official conspiracy theory of 9/11 is a bunch of hogwash. It’s impossible. … There’s a second group of facts having to do with the cover up. … Taken together these things prove that high levels of our government don’t want us to know what happened and who’s responsible.…

        Who gained from 9/11? Who covered up crucial information about 9/11? And who put out the patently false stories about 9/11 in the first place? When you take those three things together, I think the case is pretty clear that it’s highly placed individuals in the administration with all roads passing through Dick Cheney.

        I think the very kindest thing that we can say about George W. Bush and all the people in the U.S. Government that have been involved in this massive cover-up, the very kindest thing we can say is that they were aware of impending attacks and let them happen. Now some people will say that’s much too kind, however even that is high treason and conspiracy to commit murder." http://video.go

      • Signatory: Petition requesting a reinvestigation of 9/11. http://www.911truth.org/article.php

      • Bio: http://bowman2006.com/about

robin  posted on  2007-02-21   0:22:31 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#38. To: robin, ALL (#33)

Ping to post 35.

BeAChooser  posted on  2007-02-21   15:27:50 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 38.

#39. To: BeAChooser (#38)

Doesn't exactly take an expert in structures to see that this is a demolition. BTW, what is your specialty BeAChooser? Or do you have one?

WMV video of the above collapse (412kB)

High quality slo-mo zoom of above (1.4 MB)

RickyJ  posted on  2007-02-21 15:38:39 ET  (1 image) Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#56. To: BeAChooser (#38)

$100,000 reward: Prove "official" 9/11 story One man of means' attempt to set the record straight The details are still being worked out but you can tell anyone who believes boxcutter-wielding Arabs took down the Twin Towers, took out the Pentagon and crashed a plane over Pennsylvania that there's $100,000 waiting for them if they can support with facts and evidence the government explanation of 9/11. It's a good deal for 9/11 truth seekers because we know California millionaire Jimmie Walter will be able to keep his money; if publicized correctly it will be a bad deal for the Bush administration because enough people with credentials who believe the official will try, unsuccessfully to prove the Bush administration's "magic Arab" theory.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=9124194186333362123

Jimmy Walter has had a long standing offer for anyone who can prove the govt's conspiracy theory

http://www.proliberty.com/observer/20041215.htm

robin  posted on  2007-02-22 11:58:23 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 38.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest