Title: Oops!, BBC was half an hour too early reporting on WTC7 collapse Source:
BBC URL Source:http://BBC Published:Feb 26, 2007 Author:BBC Post Date:2007-02-26 09:16:39 by RickyJ Ping List:*9-11*Subscribe to *9-11* Keywords:None Views:7402 Comments:123
Sure it's just a honest oversight, I mean why would anyone want this video pulled from public view???
I had a feeling when I saw it this morning that is wasn't going to last long. The BBC probably said they were violating their copyright or something and demanded it be taken down.
God is always good! "It was an interesting day." - President Bush, recalling 9/11 [White House, 1/5/02]
"I remember getting a call from the DHS commander, telling me that they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain this BBC video wildfire, and I said, 'We've had such terrible loss of MSM credibility, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it.' And they made that decision to pull and we watched the video disappear."
God is always good! "It was an interesting day." - President Bush, recalling 9/11 [White House, 1/5/02]
Many have speculated that some kind of press release was leaked too soon and AP wires, radio stations and TV news outlets prematurely reported on WTC 7's collapse.
Maybe something similar happened regarding the report by CNN of retaliation by the US in Afganistan that day which could explain what I saw.
If you look carefully at my lips, you'll realize that I'm actually saying something else. I'm not actually telling you about the several ways I'm gradually murdering ****.
Just remember this. All agents defect, and all resisters sell out. That's the sad truth, Bill. And a writer? A writer lives the sad truth like anyone else. The only difference is, he files a report on it.
the naked lunch
If you look carefully at my lips, you'll realize that I'm actually saying something else. I'm not actually telling you about the several ways I'm gradually murdering ****.
Ooser is only trying to get you to settle on certain points so he can yank the rug out from underneath you. Metaphorically, or so.
If you look carefully at my lips, you'll realize that I'm actually saying something else. I'm not actually telling you about the several ways I'm gradually murdering ****.
Since it was you brought it to my attention, no, it wasn't worth investigating. Robin knows how to reach me, and it isn't through you, dirtwad.
If you look carefully at my lips, you'll realize that I'm actually saying something else. I'm not actually telling you about the several ways I'm gradually murdering ****.
And DIGG this story. I just did. It requires a quick sign up at digg.com. The more diggs it gets, the more visible it will be in digg.com's breaking news coverage.
So, take control! Let's propel this story up to the top!!
If you look carefully at my lips, you'll realize that I'm actually saying something else. I'm not actually telling you about the several ways I'm gradually murdering ****.
Notice the headline proclaiming WTC7 already collapsed. Then look over her left shoulder. There is WTC7 still standing.
Obviously, the BBC was following a script. Hence, the entire false flag op and media coverage of same was coordinated by dark forces that have perverted the Anglosphere. This is clear proof of the degree to which the English speaking world has been subverted by black-budgeted Spookdom.
If you look carefully at my lips, you'll realize that I'm actually saying something else. I'm not actually telling you about the several ways I'm gradually murdering ****.
I wouldn't assign sides here BAC. At least not to me. I'm not one of the people who thinks that the whole thing went down in one day, because I did a lot of research into what it would take to bring down a building. These things take weeks, and months to plan, and execute in a way that doesn't destroy the surrounding buildings. There's no way that these things were destroyed by an airplane hitting them, it's just no possible.
Just like it's not possible to rig a building like WTC 7 up for demolition in a matter of hours. If that were the case, then contractors and developers would be destroying buildings every single day in quick succession without a problem. Hell, it would be cheaper to take an airplane and destroy a building in some cases, than hire a demolition company to destroy it and do clean up.
You claim to be objective. Use your objective thinking skills to delve deep into the whole scenario, and how YOU yourself could make it happen. You'll find that by doing so, you'd realize that the official story is a bit off to say the least.
I don't think BeAChooser will answer. Would you if you were a Jew?
I wouldn't if I were a cheap shill like BAC.
If you look carefully at my lips, you'll realize that I'm actually saying something else. I'm not actually telling you about the several ways I'm gradually murdering ****.
