Freedom4um

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

9/11
See other 9/11 Articles

Title: 911 Debunkers Defend War Criminals, Liars, Mass Murderers
Source: Rense
URL Source: http://www.rense.com/general76/911s.htm
Published: Apr 21, 2007
Author: Douglas Herman
Post Date: 2007-04-22 13:39:20 by robin
Ping List: *9-11*     Subscribe to *9-11*
Keywords: None
Views: 651
Comments: 5

911 Debunkers Defend War Criminals, Liars, Mass Murderers
By Douglas Herman
Exclusive to http://Rense.com
4-21-7

911 debunkers---those deaf, dumb and blind (to logic, physics and evidence) accessories to a crime---spend far more time attacking those of us in the 911 Truth Movement than seeking either truth or justice. Far easier for these sad and misguided citizens to accept the Big Lie of 911 than stare into the harsh light and accept the fact that when they defend the "official story" they defend liars, incompetents, embezzlers, war criminals, poisoners and torturers.

Because, by defending the official version of 911 events, they accept the veracity and trustworthiness of government officials who have lied, embezzled, poisoned, imprisoned, tortured, murdered and plundered.

As a group, 911 "debunkers," could be classified as accessories to a very serious crime--if that crime were ever seriously investigated. As guilty of destroying this nation as those silent and complicit German citizens were who served the Nazi regime and wrecked Germany in the process.

Debunkers claim massive incompetence caused 911. They claim a former disgruntled CIA employee and his 19 underlings flew under the radar and hijacked four Boeings and blew up eight buildings (Seven WTC buildings and the Pentagon).

However, these debunkers spend far more time lambasting critics of the 911 Big Lie than they do goading the incompetent and criminally negligent administration to pursue and capture Osama Bin Laden. If OBL really masterminded 911, why haven't these so-called "debunkers" petitioned their incompetent government to get Osama, whatever the cost? Why aren't these debunkers at the gates of the White House with their signs and megaphones?

Because debunkers are phonies and frauds, cowards and fakes. Debunkers are enablers, not critics, of this criminally incompetent government. By accepting the OCT, the official conspiracy theory, put forth by the same criminal and incompetent government that the debunkers say "failed" to act on 911, these debunkers become as guilty of the crime as their foul government, because they too fail to act.

Who do the debunkers protect?

They protect everyone in the foul government who never served a day in jail for failing to protect American sky and soil. They protect everyone in the foul government who never fully investigated 911. They protect everyone in the foul government who voted enormous sums to pursue a fake war on terror. Everyone who allowed not one but two attorneys general to foul the US Constitution. Debunkers have a lot to answer for, not least of all the fake investigation of 911, and the fake war on terror that followed.

Because debunkers never demanded criminal indictments against the top NORAD generals or Pentagon officials, debunkers are as guilty of 911 as anyone. What! More guilty than Osama for 3,000 murders? Yes, because debunkers wholly accepted the moral evasions and insipid hand-wringing of the criminal Bushco gang, but without demanding of those responsible they pay for criminal negligence that resulted in 3,000+ deaths.

Yes, because these debunkers never demanded the capture of Osama Bin Laden, the so-called mastermind of 911, according to the US government and the legion of nodding heads called debunkers, OBL still enjoys his freedom.

If debunkers, and the government of incompetents, cannot even capture the mastermind of 911, but allow him to escape and have forgotten him since, how much more criminal and inept can you debunkers and your government appear?

Debunkers accepted the fraud of Condolezza Rice and her statements that nobody imagined terrorists would hijack planes and smash them into tall buildings. Even when that statement was proven a lie. Indeed debunkers were so Uncritical of Rice, they allowed her to be promoted from National Security advisor to Secretary of State. Indeed, all the incompetents of 911 were promoted, praised or profited by the 911 attack.

Debunkers love to exonerate Larry Silverstein, the opportunistic landlord of the entire WTC who leased the property only months before. Silverstein profited by $500 million when WTC-7 mysteriously plunged to the ground. Recall, WTC-7 was a top security, quasi-government 47 story building that was never struck by any plane and crashed to the ground in 6.5 seconds. Such was the inconsequential, redundant nature of WTC-7, that the government sponsored, Kean Commission Report (Debunkers Handbook) failed to mention the building at all.

Debunkers claim that all buildings would have fallen. They've gotten a group of government-funded scientists to say the same. They claim that Lucky Larry earned an honest windfall profit. They claim his statement, "maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it. And they made that decision to pull and we watched the building collapse," indicate that some buildings collapse on cue.

Debunkers never contest the toxic, iridium-filled dust cloud over Manhattan. Nor the speedy fall of the buildings themselves. They blame 911 Truthers for raising such questions. They say we dishonor the dead by raising painful questions.

Unfortunately, people like EPA director, Christine Todd Whitman, whose job it was to protect Americans in the days and weeks following 911, dishonored the living and made them into the living-dead, by falsely claiming the poisoned air was safe to breathe!

But, for some reason, the 911 debunkers have no problem with that crime. They rarely question the government, nor the highly-paid government officials whose job it was to protect Americans. Since debunkers believe the OCT, they naturally believe Whitman and the EPA made an honest mistake. Meanwhile hundreds more 911 first responders will die because of criminals like Christine Todd Whitman.

In the debunkers' world view, the government was negligent on 911 but benign, a victim of unfortunate circumstances. Never mind that not ONE single government official ever suffered for their negligence. Nor have I ever read of a known debunker--and most debunkers (unlike Truthers), prefer to remain "anonymous," demand that negligent officials suffer fines or imprisonment for the criminal negligence that resulted--and will result--in thousands of deaths.

Debunkers fail to comprehend the seriousness of their crimes. And it is a felony to be an accessory to a high crime, such as 911. By defending the official government version of 911 events, they have allowed all the culprits to escape punishment for their crimes.

Noted Lefty debunkers claim we Truthers enable government crimes by focusing on 911 as the event that lead to the invasion of Afghanistan and Iraq. But it is 911 debunkers who provide a justification for the war criminals to conduct their illegal wars. By compounding the lies, by compounding the deception, by preventing a complete investigation of the 911 massacre, debunkers contribute to the ongoing war crimes.

Debunkers thus, are closely comparable to the so-called "Good Germans" who allowed the excesses of Hitler and the rise of Nazism. By waving away the suspicious anomalies of the inexplicable WTC collapse, comparable to the Reichstag Fire to anyone who looks at the two objectively, the debunkers---however civic minded they would like to pretend---serve the government well.

The negligent state, master criminals in the minds of Truthers, never need fear as long as millions of citizens blindly accept the flaw-ridden story of 911 as a terror plot by some obscure mastermind who was neither caught nor pursued.

Debunkers: Enablers of war criminals, frauds, liars, greedy profiteers, poisoners, fascists, fake scientists and fellow destroyers of the US Constitution.

American citizen of German ancestry, USAF veteran and outspoken critic of NORAD, Douglas Herman writes of Rense frequently on the evident fraud of 911. Email at douglasherman7@yahoo.com Subscribe to *9-11*

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: robin (#0) (Edited)

Sadly, our shadow government and current government contains so many ex Nazis or current MOSSAD and their spawn that this kind of chicanery is SOP.

Paul Revere  posted on  2007-04-22   14:24:53 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Robin, Jethro Tull, Christine, Honway, Aristeides, Diana, All (#0)

Come May, Griffin's new book, "Debunking the 9-11 Debunkers" is due to be on the shelves.

I trust it's in his usual thorough and accurate style.

(But, I'm prejudiced!)


SKYDRIFTER  posted on  2007-04-22   16:42:39 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: robin, ALL (#0)

911 debunkers---those deaf, dumb and blind (to logic, physics and evidence)

Funny that those claiming 911 debunkers are deaf, dumb and blind to physics don't have a single macro-world physicist in their camp. All they have are physicists who spent the last 30 years studying sub-atomic particles or the micro-structure of solar cells. Indeed, one can even say there isn't a single structural engineer, demolition expert, materials expert (outside one whose expertise is dental materials) or seismologist in the world who believes the 9/11 towers were brought down with bombs or energy beams. Now who is deaf, dumb and blind to physics?

spend far more time attacking those of us in the 911 Truth Movement than seeking either truth or justice.

Because you will not find truth or justice if you start with a foundation of misinformation and lies. When Steven Jones, one of the primary leaders of the "truth" movement claims that this:

is a photo of slag from a pool of molten metal, there can be only one result if none of the other *truthers* point out the obvious ... the whole "truth" movement will be discredited. And then the truth about 9/11 will never be discovered.

Debunkers claim that all buildings would have fallen. They've gotten a group of government-funded scientists to say the same.

Government funded scientists and engineers aren't the only one saying this. The sad reality that the *truth* movement can not face the fact that not a single professional in any discipline related to really understanding what happened to the towers supports the truth movement. NOT ONE. Out of thousands and thousands and thousands AROUND THE WORLD. Instead, all the *truth* movement can do is claim they are all either incompetent, part of the conspiracy, driven solely by money and fear of losing their jobs or uninformed. Which is nonsense. And uttering obvious nonsense will eventually only ensure that the whole "truth" movement is discredited so that NONE of the good questions get answered.

They claim his statement, "maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it. And they made that decision to pull and we watched the building collapse," indicate that some buildings collapse on cue.

This is nonsensical. The debunkers don't claim this. The debunkers say that if you look at the words in the sentence before the phrase "maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it", Silverstein was clearly talking about the firefighting effort.

Debunkers never contest the toxic, iridium-filled dust cloud over Manhattan. Nor the speedy fall of the buildings themselves. They blame 911 Truthers for raising such questions.

No, what they proceed to do is show that the CT community doesn't really understand what the presence of iridium in the dust indicates and that the towers didn't fall at the speed certain members of the CT community continue to insist on claiming.

---------------------------------------------------------

Aren't you lucky. You get to receive one of the 15 posts I'm allowed each day.

BeAChooser  posted on  2007-04-22   22:51:38 ET  (1 image) Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: robin (#0)

http://freedom4um.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=50387

Why the towers fell: Two theories [by a civil engineer]

William Rice, P.E., is a registered professional civil engineer who worked on structural steel (and concrete) buildings in Boston, New York, and Philadelphia. He was also a professor at Vermont Technical College where he taught engineering materials, structures lab, and other building related courses,

honway  posted on  2007-04-22   22:55:11 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: honway, robin, all (#4)

William Rice, P.E., is a registered professional civil engineer who worked on structural steel (and concrete) buildings in Boston, New York, and Philadelphia. He was also a professor at Vermont Technical College where he taught engineering materials, structures lab, and other building related courses,

Any actual proof of that, honway? His name doesn't come up when the Vermont Technical College website is searched. And there is no indication on the web of a civil engineer named William Rice working on structures in Boston, New York or ANYWHERE. Given all the untruth in his statement (I pointed that out on that thread you linked), how do you know his claimed credentials are true?

---------------------------------------------------------

Aren't you lucky. You get to receive one of the 15 posts I'm allowed each day.

BeAChooser  posted on  2007-04-23   12:07:38 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest