Freedom4um

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Sports
See other Sports Articles

Title: Ron Paul Spam Machine in Full Effect
Source: mcain2008.com
URL Source: http://mcain2008.com/2007/06/06/ron ... l-spam-machine-in-full-effect/
Published: Jun 8, 2007
Author: mcain2008.com
Post Date: 2007-06-08 17:38:26 by can of corn
Keywords: kooks, paulbots, tinfoil
Views: 5311
Comments: 150

Surprise, surprise. The internet thinks that Ron Paul won the debate last night. What is the deal with his supporters? Are they just a bunch of IT guys who have built little voting programs to stuff the ballot on behalf of their man?

CNN has a poll right now asking about last night’s debate. Ron Paul leads the field by a wide margin in each of the following questions:

1) Who do you think won the debate?

2) Who seemed to know most about the issues?

3) Who had the best one-liner or comeback?

4) Whose performance was most surprising?

5) Whose campaign got the biggest boost from the debate?

And of course he is not leading this question: 1) Who had the most disappointing performance at the debate?

Seriously folks, what is the deal? How could anyone in their right mind think Ron Paul won last night’s debate? The guy barely got 20 words in the whole time. I think it actually diminishes Ron Paul’s message for his supporters to so obviously stuff the ballots in these polls that can be manipulated. Real polling shows Ron Paul in a dead heat with “other” and Mickey Mouse, so it’s obviously a farce for him to be leading in these online polls.

And as a funny aside, not surprisingly, Ron Paul isn’t leading the polling for this question “Who was the snappiest dresser?” Apparently suave Mitt Romney just beat out Ron Paul’s cheap suit and crooked tie.

The mainstream press seems to think that the big three (McCain, Giuliani, and Romney) all had strong performances last night. Also, Mike Huckabee was a pleasant surprise. His sharp wit and gentle demeanor seemed to please a lot of folks. That being said, he still has very little shot at winning the nomination. So let’s please narrow the field down before the next debate.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: can of corn (#0)

Ron Paul Spam Machine in Full Effect

Let me fix that for you.

Ron Paul NWO/RNC/CFR Spam Spin Machine in Full Effect

There, that's better.


You appear to be a major trouble maker...and I'm getting really pissed. - GoldiLox, 7/27/2006

FormerLurker  posted on  2007-06-08   17:43:21 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: FormerLurker (#1)

much better bump

Dr.Ron Paul for President

Lod  posted on  2007-06-08   17:44:54 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: can of corn (#0)

RP only had 20 words, eh? yeah, but he said more that resonated with the people in those "20 words" than the main three skunks said in thousands. and, btw, it's not the internet who thinks RP won the debate. it's real Americans. awful threatened by that, aren't you?

christine  posted on  2007-06-08   17:48:58 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: can of corn (#0)

Paul campaign...

http://www.ronpaul2008.com/

June 08, 2007 "Tracking Ron Paul's Internet Boom"

"Congressman Ron Paul's surprising second place finish in Fox News' debate watchers text message poll was just the start of his increasing popularity. Paul had received little mention as a true contender for the GOP nomination, yet he earned 25% of the vote and is leaving political analysts scratching their heads.

"It is not just the Fox News poll that shows a jump in support for Paul since the second Republican Debate last month in South Carolina. According to http://TechPresident.com, Paul's MySpace support has jumped over 20% to 15,000 "friends." Moreover, Paul's YouTube stats have increased 621.2% with 533,314 video downloads. Nearly one million people have visited the Ron Paul YouTube Channel, which is second only to Barrack Obama. Earlier in the week, he appeared on the popular YouTube channel DomeNation, speaking about his recent quarrel with fellow Republican Rudy Giluiani.

"Paul's online support is beginning to translate into tangible results offline. Last Friday, the congressman was hailed as Bill Maher's "new favorite person" on his HBO show Real Time with Bill Maher. A rally was held shortly before the taping of the show, completely organized by supporters unaffiliated with the campaign through http://Eventful.com. His campaign is hiring staff in the early primary states, and the campaign claims to see a spike in fundraising. So why is Paul conquering the web, yet barely registering in the minds of the established media?

"Paul's anti interventionist message combined with the utilization of internet-based technology has made him arguably the Internet's most popular Republican politician. Because of the Web he is able to reach millions of voters without raising or spending millions of dollars. How far will this internet boom carry the Republican dark horse in his quest for the presidency?"

The Latest PoliTicker, PoliticsOnline, 06/01/07

The spammers are everywhere ;)

“Yes, but is this good for Jews?"

Eoghan  posted on  2007-06-08   17:52:13 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: can of corn, BeAChooser (#0) (Edited)

BeAChooser, meet can of corn. Can of corn, meet BeAChooser. You two should get along fine.

Free Image Hosting at www.ImageShack.us

SmokinOPs  posted on  2007-06-08   17:54:42 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: Eoghan (#4)

Great info - thank you!

Dr.Ron Paul for President

Lod  posted on  2007-06-08   17:57:03 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: Eoghan (#4)

hehehehehe

christine  posted on  2007-06-08   17:57:28 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: christine (#3)

Replies to the mccain campaign piece... More "spam" :P

http://mcain2008.com/2007/06/06/ron-paul-spam-machine-in-full-effect/

12 Responses to “Ron Paul Spam Machine in Full Effect”

1. TJ Says: June 6th, 2007 at 1:11 pm

I think there are just alot of people who want to support a candidate that actually understands and obeys the Constitution. 2. John Says: June 6th, 2007 at 2:44 pm

This is an illegitimate article. There is no such thing as “stuffing ballot boxes.” It is obvious that he is winning the polls because he has SUPPORT. He did win the debate because he focuses on the strongest message and has the best policies. 3. John's Dad Says: June 6th, 2007 at 3:19 pm

Maybe since Paul is such a loser, all his supporters are too, hence the large amount of spare time they have to manipulate online polls. I bet they have WoW accounts too.

OK, enough online rambling. I’m gonna go buy some whiskey and cigarettes and see if I can reconnect with my long-lost son. 4. Eric Boyer Says: June 6th, 2007 at 3:30 pm

I’m very much a real person. I really voted for Bush in 1998 and I really kick myself over that decision.

I really really want our government to make sense again.

Did I mention I’m a real person with a real vote? 5. Jason Says: June 6th, 2007 at 3:32 pm

His supporters are more passionate than anyone elses because they actually care about the Constitution and the country. We don’t want another George Bush clone or Hilary Clinton… what we are left with is a 70 year old Texan who everyone says “can’t win” yet has more support than all the other candidates.

If his supporters are just spam, then why is he the most searched candidate on Technorati, Myspace, and Youtube? Ron Paul is the GOP’s version of Howard Dean, and he has almost a year to keep gathering supporters.

As a military veteran, and as a person who believes in free markets and the constitution, there is no other candidate. The other 9 Republicans advocated a preemptive nuklear strike on Iran last night! What kind of nut cases are we trying to get to lead this country??? And the Democrats want the nanny state to take over our lives. Paul is the only one who is trying to stop the insanity. Thats why he has support.

Watch this, he is the only one who gets what is really going on…

“Yes, but is this good for Jews?"

Eoghan  posted on  2007-06-08   17:59:40 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: Eoghan (#8)

As a military veteran, and as a person who believes in free markets and the constitution, there is no other candidate. The other 9 Republicans advocated a preemptive nuklear strike on Iran last night! What kind of nut cases are we trying to get to lead this country??? And the Democrats want the nanny state to take over our lives. Paul is the only one who is trying to stop the insanity. Thats why he has support.

Watch this, he is the only one who gets what is really going on…

in a nut-shell bump

Dr.Ron Paul for President

Lod  posted on  2007-06-08   18:02:23 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: can of corn (#0)

I've been thinking about the difference between Ron Paul's internet support, which is extreme, and his "polling" support, which is negligible. First, the polls are done in a manner that excludes a lot of the population, especially those without land lines, etc. Secondly, the polls are dated. That said, a responsible polling would still likely show him to be in single digits.

But on the internet it's vastly different. And the reason for this is obvious. The internet voters who "spam" on his behalf are passionate about him. More so than the supporters of any other candidate. Why is this so? Because these are people who have studied politics and are curious and passionate about politics, history and keeping themselves informed. They form, basically, an intelligentsia about these issues.

They are the bloggers who correct you when you say the Gold Standard was demolished in 1974 when we went away from Bretton-Woods. They are the people who will correct you when you say the Iranian Prime Minister was deposed by the CIA at the behest of Shell Oil (it wasn't Shell Oil, it was a different oil company).

They are passionate about history and politics and truth and accuracy. Accordingly, they are passionate about Ron Paul. Because he is a student of history who understands how far our country has gone astray from its promise. He appeals to others who've had the passion and diligence to inform themselves of the truth, because if you take an honest look at our history and an open minded look at the world absent spin, you can't help but come to the same conclusions he does.

He's the candidate of the well-informed patriot. He's the candidate of the smart economist. He's the candidate of the disillusioned former major party apparatchik. He's the candidate of the honest American who recognizes that the media is no longer honest and no longer serves the people.

If that makes some sheep like the writer of this piece nervous or whatever? Who gives a crap?

Like the GOP has ANY chance whatsoever of picking a winner in 2008?

Maybe you're the idiot who ought to get serious.

And the publican, standing far off, would not so much as lift his eyes unto heaven, but smote his breast, saying, God be merciful to me a sinner. I tell you, this man went down to his house justified rather thant he other: for every one that exalteth himself shall be abased; and he that humbleth himself shall be exalted. -Luke 18: 14.

bluedogtxn  posted on  2007-06-08   18:05:11 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: bluedogtxn (#10)

They are passionate about history and politics and truth and accuracy. Accordingly, they are passionate about Ron Paul. Because he is a student of history who understands how far our country has gone astray from its promise. He appeals to others who've had the passion and diligence to inform themselves of the truth, because if you take an honest look at our history and an open minded look at the world absent spin, you can't help but come to the same conclusions he does.

He's the candidate of the well-informed patriot. He's the candidate of the smart economist. He's the candidate of the disillusioned former major party apparatchik. He's the candidate of the honest American who recognizes that the media is no longer honest and no longer serves the people.

Perfectly said - thank you!

Dr.Ron Paul for President

Lod  posted on  2007-06-08   18:12:18 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: bluedogtxn (#10)

He's the candidate of the

blame America first defeatists and losers who would have al Qaeda dictate US foreeign policy through extortion.

No thanks.

can of corn  posted on  2007-06-08   18:16:23 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: lodwick, All (#9)

More ways to spam !

Event dot com

Find your city below and click Demand it! to join

Join a Demand for Ron Paul http://eventful.com/performers/P0-001-000016544-9/demand

“Yes, but is this good for Jews?"

Eoghan  posted on  2007-06-08   18:17:24 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: bluedogtxn, can of corn (#10)

outstanding.

apparently those "spammers" are also putting their money where their mouths fingers are-- Ron Paul-- The Five Million Dollar Man?

christine  posted on  2007-06-08   18:20:45 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: can of corn (#12)

blame America first defeatists and losers who would have al Qaeda dictate US foreeign policy through extortion.

Do you wet your Depends as you type that whining lickspittle propaganda? REAL Americans care enough about Truth and Justice as to see an end to a war that should never have been fought, that has killed close to a million innocent people, and has maimed countless more.

What has the war in Iraq done for America? How has this Nation benefitted from it?

Nobody is advocating that we allow Al-Qaeda to "dictate" US policy. US policy should be based upon what is right for the American People, NOT for what is right for those that run the military industrial complex and profit from war.

Al-Qaeda wouldn't even BE in Iraq if we didn't cause half the population there to rise up against our occupation of that country. If anything, people such as YOU aid and abet Al-Qaeda by helping it find new recruits.


You appear to be a major trouble maker...and I'm getting really pissed. - GoldiLox, 7/27/2006

FormerLurker  posted on  2007-06-08   18:27:45 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: FormerLurker (#1)

NWO/RNC/CFR Spam Spin Machine in Full Effect

How do you cross things out like that?

I learned how to post graphics 'n' stuff.

WTF?  posted on  2007-06-08   18:34:01 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#17. To: FormerLurker (#15)

Do you wet your Depends as you type that whining lickspittle propaganda?

Uh-oh, I hope I don't get in shit for hanging out with you.

LOL!!

;^)

I learned how to post graphics 'n' stuff.

WTF?  posted on  2007-06-08   18:36:29 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: can of corn (#0)

You know, all you anybody-but-Paul fuckheads are going to deserve whatever regime is elected if it isn't Ron Paul. Hillary can beat any of the current Republicans EXCEPT Paul. But that doesn't matter to you does it? God knows you'd rather have Hillary Clinton than the only candidate with the will to use the constitution and save the republic. Yeah, you're gonna get the government that at least YOU deserve.

After 2008 don't go whining because the deadly poison you knowingly chose to ingest is now causing you agony. There is a case for compassion, but not for you.

PnbC  posted on  2007-06-08   18:36:33 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: All (#17)

shit

oops, I'm used to it showin' up like this: s**t.

I learned how to post graphics 'n' stuff.

WTF?  posted on  2007-06-08   18:38:45 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#20. To: WTF? (#16)

How do you cross things out like that?

You surround the text you want to "strike" with the following HTML tags (I'll put a space between the tag and the < > characters to prevent the browser from acting upon it);

< strike > text you want to strike < /strike >

It'd look like this if you didn't have the spaces in the tag..

text you want to strike


You appear to be a major trouble maker...and I'm getting really pissed. - GoldiLox, 7/27/2006

FormerLurker  posted on  2007-06-08   18:39:53 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#21. To: WTF? (#17)

Uh-oh, I hope I don't get in shit for hanging out with you.

I doubt Goldi cares, or pays close enough attention to the posts here at 4um to even know.


You appear to be a major trouble maker...and I'm getting really pissed. - GoldiLox, 7/27/2006

FormerLurker  posted on  2007-06-08   18:41:23 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#22. To: can of corn (#12)

who are you on LP?

christine  posted on  2007-06-08   18:41:49 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#23. To: can of corn (#0)

lilPod? Is that you?

"A functioning police state needs no police." - William S Burroughs

Dakmar  posted on  2007-06-08   18:42:32 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#24. To: WTF? (#16)

do this

< s > the text of what you want to strike through < /s >

(without the spaces)

christine  posted on  2007-06-08   18:44:13 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#25. To: christine (#22)

who are you on LP?

Wasn't there a poster called "TongueUpMaGolbergsRectum"?

"A functioning police state needs no police." - William S Burroughs

Dakmar  posted on  2007-06-08   18:44:17 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#26. To: christine (#22) (Edited)

who are you on LP?

Sounds like either MadDog or Byteshredder. They are both fascist bootlickers that appear to have free reign there to wage unrestrained personal attacks on posters that attempt to discuss things rationally.


You appear to be a major trouble maker...and I'm getting really pissed. - GoldiLox, 7/27/2006

FormerLurker  posted on  2007-06-08   18:45:23 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#27. To: can of corn (#12)

blame America first defeatists and losers who would have al Qaeda zionists and Israel dictate US foreeign policy through extortion.

I fear the zio-cons much more than I fear al-CIA-duh.

Dr.Ron Paul for President

Lod  posted on  2007-06-08   18:45:57 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#28. To: WTF? (#19)

oops, I'm used to it showin' up like this: s**t.

lol

christine  posted on  2007-06-08   18:45:58 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#29. To: Dakmar (#25)

i never saw that one. :P

christine  posted on  2007-06-08   18:48:13 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#30. To: All (#26)

who are you on LP?

It could also be Final Authority. We've nicknamed him Final Solution, as he's all for the extermination of all Muslims across the planet.


You appear to be a major trouble maker...and I'm getting really pissed. - GoldiLox, 7/27/2006

FormerLurker  posted on  2007-06-08   18:51:06 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#31. To: can of corn (#0) (Edited)

Real polling shows Ron Paul

is a such a threat to globalist cocksuckers like you that you are forced to drag out propaganda techniques that even Goebbles would have thought clumsy?

"A functioning police state needs no police." - William S Burroughs

Dakmar  posted on  2007-06-08   18:51:30 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#32. To: PnbC (#18)

hillary can't be any worse than what we have now. in reality, if she's (S) elected, she'll simply be the next conductor driving the train of destruction of America.

christine  posted on  2007-06-08   18:56:22 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#33. To: can of corn (#12)

blame America first defeatists and losers who would have al Qaeda dictate US foreeign policy through extortion.

No thanks.

Every year my tax dollars are stolen at gunpoint and used to bomb nations most people can't find on a map. If that's your idea of "freedom" you can keep it.

No Iraqi or Afghan ever robbed from my paycheck or crowded me into a free speech zone

P.S What is "victory?" in the War On (some) Terror and what does it look like?

P.P.S Seeing that the US Govt has done AL-CIA-duh's bidding in the Balkins and Iraq, when do we bomb ourselves for supporting the terrorists?

"The more I see of life, the less I fear death" - Me.

Pissed Off Janitor  posted on  2007-06-08   18:56:48 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#34. To: can of corn (#0)

By the way if we Paul supporters are SO few in number that only by "spamming" can the online polls numbers be so high, then I DARE you McCainiacs to attempt the same. Surely your real numbers are so high that you could easily outpoll Paul in online polls, right?

But you can't, because you are limited to voting once just like Paul supporters. But don't let reality get in the way of avoiding the facts.

PnbC  posted on  2007-06-08   18:59:41 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#35. To: Pissed Off Janitor (#33)

P.S What is "victory?" in the War On (some) Terror and what does it look like?

P.P.S Seeing that the US Govt has done AL-CIA-duh's bidding in the Balkins and Iraq, when do we bomb ourselves for supporting the terrorists?

love it

christine  posted on  2007-06-08   19:03:08 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#36. To: FormerLurker, can of corn (#15)

Nobody is advocating that we allow Al-Qaeda to "dictate" US policy.

They do now, and what we want to do is change that; does anyone doubt the following?

Al-Qaeda = CIA

The Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.

richard9151  posted on  2007-06-08   19:11:43 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#37. To: richard9151 (#36)

Al-Qaeda = CIA

Many things do in fact point towards that possibility. But it's a bit more complicated than that.

I think it's more of a Mossad->CIA->ISI->Al-Qaeda trail of links.


You appear to be a major trouble maker...and I'm getting really pissed. - GoldiLox, 7/27/2006

FormerLurker  posted on  2007-06-08   19:14:47 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#38. To: can of corn (#0)

And as a funny aside, not surprisingly, Ron Paul isn’t leading the polling for this question “Who was the snappiest dresser?” Apparently suave Mitt Romney just beat out Ron Paul’s cheap suit and crooked tie.

The people who judge candidates by how they dress must be really deep thinkers.

To reason, indeed, he was not in the habit of attending. His mode of arguing, if it is to be so called, was one not uncommon among dull and stubborn persons, who are accustomed to be surrounded by their inferiors. He asserted a proposition; and, as often as wiser people ventured respectfully to show that it was erroneous, he asserted it again, in exactly the same words, and conceived that, by doing so, he at once disposed of all objections. - Macaulay, "History of England," Vol. 1, Chapter 6, on James II.

aristeides  posted on  2007-06-08   19:17:33 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#39. To: christine (#35)

Were you at the Austin rally last night? If so; were you standing near Alex?

Remember...G-d saved more animals than people on the ark. www.siameserescue.org

who knows what evil  posted on  2007-06-08   19:18:08 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#40. To: PnbC (#34)

But don't let reality get in the way of avoiding the facts.

They seem to thrive on misinfo, disinfo, spin, and sputum.

"A functioning police state needs no police." - William S Burroughs

Dakmar  posted on  2007-06-08   19:18:45 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  



      .
      .
      .

Comments (41 - 150) not displayed.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest