Freedom4um

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Activism
See other Activism Articles

Title: TOM CRYER ACQUITTED-UPDATE, SUPER SPECIAL EDITION
Source: TruthAttack.org
URL Source: www.truthattack.com
Published: Jul 15, 2007
Author: TruthAttack
Post Date: 2007-07-15 15:59:07 by johnny99
Keywords: cryer, becraft, tax
Views: 368
Comments: 10

TRUTH ATTACK

(GOOD!!)

NEWS FROM THE FRONT

SUPER SPECIAL EDITION

July 13, 2007

TOM CRYER ACQUITTED

UNANIMOUS VERDICT: NOT GUILTY!!

In a time when good news is hard to come by a truck load was delivered this week when a unanimous NOT GUILTY verdict was handed down by a jury following a hotly contested and hard fought trial on Tom Cryer’s case. Hallelujah!! Never again doubt the power of prayer and hard work.

Nationally renowned tax defense attorney Larry Becraft was lead counsel backed up by long-time tax honesty advocate attorney George Harp. Larry turned in a flawless performance. Efforts by the government to prevent any testimony and evidence about the law resulted in rulings that prevented them from introducing any law or IRS procedural rules and Tom was not permitted to read to the jury from any of the key Supreme Court decisions. But those exclusions and limitations were repeatedly overcome as Larry and Tom shifted tactics and examination techniques to get the truth out for the jury to hear. Having two seasoned trial lawyers presenting the truth from both the podium and the witness box was a rare combination that was nothing less than a thing of beauty and Larry’s closing argument was truly compelling, placing the perfect “cherry” on top of a brilliantly conducted trial.

Tom Cryer’s testimony was inspirational as he clearly laid out his study of the law and the sequence of his conclusions, each leading to the next. At one point the entire courtroom was spellbound as Tom gave a passionate and heartfelt explanation of how his fundamental rights, including his right to earn a living, were not from the Constitution—not from the government—but from his Creator, and that he received those rights with the first tiny breath of air he sucked into his lungs in 1949.

Truth Troopers came to attend the trial from as far away as Virginia, Texas, Alabama, Arkansas, Mississippi and elsewhere as well as friends and associates of Tom’s from Shreveport. These patriots, who the government perceives as a bunch of wild-eyed radicals and scofflaws, sat quietly and conducted themselves in a truly dignified manner, lending credibility and substance to the message of the truth and belying the government’s portrayal of the community. We are proud of each and every one of them.

For the play-by-play account of the trial you can tune in to Larry Becraft’s and Tom Cryer’s Republic Broadcasting Network programs this Saturday http://(www.republicbroadcasting.org). Both Larry and Tom will be on their two RBN programs and they will be taking questions at 800 313-9443.

Larry Becraft’s RBN show “airs” from 9-10 a.m. Central and Tom’s from 2-4 p.m. Central. A lot of the trial went on behind the scenes and you can be assured that there will be plenty of stories and tidbits of what actually goes on that even those attending could not see or hear.

NOTE: Tom Cryer has asked us to remind everyone that his victory is not a ticket to take on the beast single-handed. He warns that his course of action is too risky for most and that fighting together, protected by the First Amendment, is the best avenue for us to pursue. He says the antidote for a lie is the Truth.

TOM IS STILL IN THE HOLE

WE NEED TO HELP HIM CLIMB OUT

Although Tom Cryer has won an amazing victory for the cause of truth and the restoration of the rule of law, the battle was not won without paying a steep price. His practice has been ruined and he has incurred expenses he still has to meet. He is having to start all over again and we can help. Please do what you can, no matter how much or how little, by going to http://www.liefreezone.com and clicking “Send Help”.

You can donate to the cause on line through the paypal link or you can send help to Tom’s defense fund at the address provided.

TA FUNDS REQUEST REMINDER

(WE NEED TO STRIKE WHILE THE IRON IS STILL HOT)

Tom Cryer’s victory proves that we can win. People WILL listen and CAN recognize the Truth when they hear it. But spreading that message is not free. Now is exactly the time to capitalize on this sensational news.

The recent request for Twenty FRN’s (about $1.54) has resulted in roughly five percent of us sending in this badly needed help. All Tom Cryer risked was everything he had, so can’t we ALL risk twenty “whatever those are”? Please (but as always, only if you can do so without financial injury) chip in to help TA follow through on this immense step forward. On line through the web site or send to Truth Attack, 4348 Youree Drive, Shreveport, LA 71105

PLEASE FORWARD THIS GOOD NEWS TO EVERYONE

DON'T LET THIS IMPORTANT INFORMATION STOP SPREADING

www.truthattack.org

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: johnny99 (#0)

Efforts by the government to prevent any testimony and evidence about the law resulted in rulings that prevented them from introducing any law or IRS procedural rules and Tom was not permitted to read to the jury from any of the key Supreme Court decisions.

Kangaroo Court

A lot of the trial went on behind the scenes and you can be assured that there will be plenty of stories and tidbits of what actually goes on that even those attending could not see or hear.

Star Chambers

NOTE: Tom Cryer has asked us to remind everyone that his victory is not a ticket to take on the beast single-handed. He warns that his course of action is too risky for most ...

Rigged !

Contemplate the mangled bodies of your countrymen, and then say 'what should be the reward of such sacrifices?' Bid us and our posterity bow the knee, supplicate the friendship, plough, sow, and reap, to glut the avarice of the men who have let loose on us the dogs of war to riot in our blood and hunt us from the face of the earth?

If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude than the animated contest of freedom, go from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains sit lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen!”

noone222  posted on  2007-07-15   16:08:11 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: noone222 (#1)

Rigged !

what do you mean?

christine  posted on  2007-07-15   16:22:02 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: christine (#2)

Rigged !

what do you mean?

I told you how in the 1980's the DOJ tried to slip former Los Angeles IRS PIO Laura Myers on a tax jury in Phoenix under her married name, but fortunately the patriots made her and bumped her.

I guess the feds will have "special" set aside juries next. That is, entire jury pools of people who have already served and convicted in previous trials.

HOUNDDAWG  posted on  2007-07-15   17:00:15 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: noone222 (#1)

Rigged !

You are correct, and this case means nothing because it will not be published and no one will be able to use it in the next case. Each and every case has to be fought just like it is the first one ever done. Makes it really hard to win.

And I suspect that you are right about what is next; complete control of the jury pool.

When a man who is honestly mistaken hears the truth, he will either quit being mistaken or cease to be honest.

richard9151  posted on  2007-07-15   20:16:26 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: johnny99, *libertarians* (#0)

ping

Why settle for the lesser of two evils, vote Cthulhu!

freepatriot32  posted on  2007-07-16   3:52:41 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: christine (#2) (Edited)

what do you mean?

All I meant was that very few cases are going to be heard wherein the defendant is equally aware of court room procedure, the complete law (CFR, USC, IRS Code etc.,) and capable of presenting his/her case without quoting prior cases or the laws.

It's also difficult for an untrained person to overcome the skills of the Judge when he/she determines not to allow the defendant to present supporting evidence. (Dick Simkanin, Tupper Saussy, Gordon Kahl, Larkin and Tessa Rose come immediately to my mind. All knowledgeable, all depending upon laws and CONstitutions, all incarcerated or dead.}

This case only serves the Cryer matter and has no application to any other. Larry Becraft and Tommy Cryer have at least 50 years legal expertise between them, and had another attorney assisting. Most aren't able to afford such a defense.

Finally, I think Mr. Cryer did the right thing for himself because he had to. But, all that was proven in his trial was that on occasion a jury can be convinced to acquit. In the interim, Mr. Cryer has advocated, on RBN, the "no law" theory with the caveat "don't try this at home kiddies". His defense was based upon the same law, cases and codes presented by many others that have failed, and in my opinion at this time had less "liability" than Cryer because of his occupation of "privilege" being an attorney (Esquire/Officer of the Court/Soldier of the State) even though Lawyers aren't actually licensed.

The danger that I see with this particular case is that it will cause many to remain in a system through their own agreements to do business with the fed, and when they withdraw their "returns" will not be savvy enough to defend themselves when attacked.

I tend to agree with Mr. Cryer and a million others whose claim is that there is no law making the average person liable for the so-called income tax. On the other hand, I believe that liability attaches through adhesion contracts, implied trusts, or other somewhat invisible means such as the certification of birth by the STATE (a copy of which is recorded with the FEDERAL U.S. Department of COMMERCE), or even the usage of FRN's or credit created by the fed reserve.

The tax battle demands a clear cut, concise and unqualified ruling regarding the "income tax" ... only then will something have been accomplished.

When we consider that these squabbles over the "income tax" have continued for almost 100 years without such an outcome/ruling, to the detriment of thousands of good citizens, some incarcerated others bankrupted or suffering divorce or even death, we know there is collusion and fraud being employed against the people that are supposed to be the government or at a minimum ruled by their own consent. We the people deserve a straight and honest answer to every question asked in good faith from a government that is charged with transparent operation.

To think that the average American should have to acquire the knowledge equivalent to 25-50 years of legal training to discover non-liability; and then to suffer the additional expense and lose the time defending against tax evasion claims made against him/her when there doesn't appear to be any law subjecting him/her to participate ... this to me fits the definition of "rigged" !

Contemplate the mangled bodies of your countrymen, and then say 'what should be the reward of such sacrifices?' Bid us and our posterity bow the knee, supplicate the friendship, plough, sow, and reap, to glut the avarice of the men who have let loose on us the dogs of war to riot in our blood and hunt us from the face of the earth?

If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude than the animated contest of freedom, go from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains sit lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen!”

noone222  posted on  2007-07-16   5:38:22 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: noone222. everyone (#6)

Another casualty of 9/11 was the Congressional "tax truth" hearing that was to be held, I believe, on 9/12.

It has yet to be re-scheduled...

Join the Ron Paul Revolution

Lod  posted on  2007-07-16   9:10:00 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: noone222 (#6)

ah..great explanation.

christine  posted on  2007-07-16   9:29:39 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: noone222, Zipporah, christine, rowdee, robin, Diana, Jethro Tull, Lady X (#6)

This case only serves the Cryer matter and has no application to any other. Larry Becraft and Tommy Cryer have at least 50 years legal expertise between them, and had another attorney assisting. Most aren't able to afford such a defense.

The feds claim that jury exonerations set no legal precedents but guilty verdicts do.

This coupled with the fact that the MSM refuses to properly explain the relevant points and most people have neither the will nor the mental discipline to study the law and history means that unlike Prohibition and the onerous enforcement of The Volstead Act where nearly every juror had a relative who "took a little nip" and the govt's vilification of alcohol was rejected and convictions were nearly impossible to obtain, the govt will still be able to convict for "tax crimes" and the media will then crow about it to demoralize and mitigate the damage done by cases such as this one.

Our hope lies in the collapse of the fraud($) and even then we may wind up in slavery because most Americans will "tune in and wait for further instructions" from the Israeli in charge of DHS.

Shortly after Vernice Kuglin won she lost in tax court and the media crowed about that. What they didn't say was, if she knew about the criminal charges she'd have never petitioned tax court because she was under no obligation to do so. In fact it's required that citizens petition this administrative kangaroo court made up of former IRS agents because that automatically disposes of the "lack of jurisdiction" defense.

An honest media would also explain that everything we give the IRS under the guise of "voluntary compliance" may be used in the preparation of criminal charges and this is why filing is voluntary. Americans are supposed to know that they cannot be compelled to be witnesses against themselves and the IRS sure ain't going to explain that.

The IRS HANDBOOK FOR SPECIAL AGENTS does in fact explain that, though. If citizens could obtain copies and then send them to the IRS in response to threat letters it would have to be admitted in court or otherwise all correspondence including "notices and demand letters" would also be kept from the juries' eyes.

Once my tax education association started educating people the govt found some reason to stop filling orders for the handbook.

I even copied relevant sections of the handbook (the part that explains that citizens may claim 4th and 5th amendment protection and refuse to surrender records but if they fail to do so the privilege is considered waived, which was the exact opposite of the Miranda warning which required affirmative waiver, this too is because "taxes are voluntary" and no Miranda warning is required-more slippery, twisted self serving anti logic from the black robed tyrants who made this tyranny a reality) and included them in my college project in a course known as "admin of justice 101."

The instructor, a former Los Angeles Deputy Sheriff appreciated the info, and he could never claim ignorance again.

HOUNDDAWG  posted on  2007-07-16   10:13:28 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: HOUNDDAWG, Pinguinite (#9)

ping to Hounddawg's post

christine  posted on  2007-07-16   11:33:18 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest