Freedom4um

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Ron Paul
See other Ron Paul Articles

Title: Ross Perot had HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS OF DOLLARS and he got 20% of the vote.
Source: [None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: Nov 6, 2007
Author: me
Post Date: 2007-11-06 11:52:06 by Itisa1mosttoolate
Ping List: *Ron Paul for President 2008*     Subscribe to *Ron Paul for President 2008*
Keywords: None
Views: 282
Comments: 41

Ron Paul doesn't have a snow ball's chance. Subscribe to *Ron Paul for President 2008*

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Itisa1mosttoolate (#0)

Ron Paul doesn't have a snow balls chance.

But it is America's only chance at the moment. And don't call me a snow ball.

Register to vote for Ron Paul NOW.

wbales  posted on  2007-11-06   11:53:51 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: wbales (#1)

Like to place a bet?

"You can not save the Constitution by destroying it."

Itisa1mosttoolate  posted on  2007-11-06   12:00:36 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: Itisa1mosttoolate (#2)

Like to place a bet?

Tell you what, I'll send another C-note to Ron Paul's campaign and call us even.

Register to vote for Ron Paul NOW.

wbales  posted on  2007-11-06   12:08:21 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: Itisa1mosttoolate (#0)

Ross Perot had HUNDRES OF MILLIONS OF DOLLARS and he got 20% of the vote.

According to wiki Perot was actually leading both Bush and Clinton in the polls, but Perot damaged his popularity by the way he performed in the debates.

The opposite is true for Dr. Paul. He performs quite well in the debates ( when given a chance to speak) and his popularity surges thereafter.

scrapper2  posted on  2007-11-06   12:11:17 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: wbales (#3)

Tell you what, I'll send another C-note to Ron Paul's campaign and call us even.

Nice. Thanks.

Everyday Americans are voting with their hard-earned jack.

Join the Ron Paul Revolution

Lod  posted on  2007-11-06   12:15:43 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: wbales (#3)

Even if he wins the Republican nomination he would have to go against Hillary.

"You can not save the Constitution by destroying it."

Itisa1mosttoolate  posted on  2007-11-06   12:15:54 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: Itisa1mosttoolate, scrapper2, *Ron Paul for President 2008* (#2)

You know, Ron Paul may not be the next President of the United States. Ron Paul may not be the Republican nominee for that office. But the man is already a winner. Think about it.

Register to vote for Ron Paul NOW.

wbales  posted on  2007-11-06   12:16:45 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: Itisa1mosttoolate (#0)

Perot dropped out after being threatened by the CFR types (allegedly he had an in-person meeting with the 'chairman of the world' David Rockefeller who told him of what awaited him if he continued to pursue his candidacy seriously) and only half-heartedly resumed his campaign at the last minute.

Some say he only resumed it to throw the election to Clinton. If he did, I thank him for that anyhow. We couldn't have taken another four years of Old Man Bush.

Hard as it is to fathom, we would actually be in an EVEN WORSE condition without the fiscal actions toward budget balance taken by Clinton. Uninterrupted permanent BushWar would have already destroyed us beyond recognition by now.

“I would give no thought of what the world might say of me, if I could only transmit to posterity the reputation of an honest man.” - Sam Houston

Sam Houston  posted on  2007-11-06   12:18:54 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: Itisa1mosttoolate (#0)

Ron Paul doesn't have a snow balls chance.

Not a problem.

Send your money to Hillary and support her. Your choice.

Cynicom  posted on  2007-11-06   12:18:55 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: wbales (#7)

I would agree with your last.

About This Video Dr. W. Cleon Skousen, author of the best sellin... Dr. W. Cleon Skousen, author of the best selling "The Naked Communist" and "The Naked Capitalist" stands with Ron Paul in speaking of the US Disasterous Foriegn Policy, a policy set up for failure by the likes of David Rockefeller who desires the destruction of the freedom of all men everywhere.

In the full discourse found on the download page of AwakeAndArise.org Dr. Skousen speaks of the disastrous foreign policy of the United States, the betrayal of Chang Ki Shek to the Communists by traitors in the US State Department, including General Marshal.

Dr. Skousen Stands with Ron Paul; Rockefeller Treason

"You can not save the Constitution by destroying it."

Itisa1mosttoolate  posted on  2007-11-06   12:21:12 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: Itisa1mosttoolate (#0)

"It does not take a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brush fires of freedom in the minds of men." -- Samuel Adams (1722-1803)‡

ghostdogtxn  posted on  2007-11-06   12:23:04 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: lodwick, Itisa1mosttoolate (#5)

Itisa1mosttoolate and I are now even.

And THEN I saw my name pop up on the recent donor list!!!!

I am now excited for the remainder of the day!

Register to vote for Ron Paul NOW.

wbales  posted on  2007-11-06   12:29:50 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: Sam Houston (#8)

You got it right in #8 Sam.

"You can not save the Constitution by destroying it."

Itisa1mosttoolate  posted on  2007-11-06   12:34:22 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: wbales (#12)

And THEN I saw my name pop up on the recent donor list!!!!

I am now excited for the remainder of the day!

Very cool.

I need to get an alias, or something.

Join the Ron Paul Revolution

Lod  posted on  2007-11-06   12:36:04 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: Itisa1mosttoolate (#0)

Ron Paul doesn't have a snow balls chance

So? Don't vote for him. Personally, I don't base my vote on whether or not a candidate has a chance of winning or not. He's got my vote regardless of his chances.

F.A. Hayek Fan  posted on  2007-11-06   15:38:47 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: Itisa1mosttoolate (#6)

he would have to go against Hillary.

My unoffical poll of college students indicates not a one would vote for Hitlery.

angle  posted on  2007-11-06   15:51:06 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#17. To: Sam Houston (#8)

Hard as it is to fathom, we would actually be in an EVEN WORSE condition without the fiscal actions toward budget balance taken by Clinton.

It was all a set up to get the sheeple primed for fleecing. Clinton/Bush are comrades.

angle  posted on  2007-11-06   15:53:14 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: angle (#16)

I am in email contact with a gal from CO I think. I'm going to be making a website for them. She and another gal are planning on sitting up on billboards for days, weeks, whatever, to raise cash for RP. They went and registered as republicans to vote in the primary. These girls take this seriously.

How many hillary or julie annie people are willing to do that?

Change for Ron Paul

Critter  posted on  2007-11-07   6:48:50 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: scrapper2 (#4)

I personally think that Perot through the election personally. He was leading both repubs & demos as you say, and then he self-destructed for some reason. I don't know if that was the plan from the beginning or if he was persuaded to do it.

but 2 incidents cause me to think this. First, he held this bizarre press conference where he said that the republicans were trying to destroy his daughter's wedding. he said there were republican spies at this wedding, and the way he spoke, it was paranoid & insane. Second, I think his performance in debates after that was purposely intended to make him look bad.

I remember GHW Bush in a debate against Clinton in 1992 checking his watch in an exaggerated manner and pacing back & forth like a fool. the tv was focusing on that. I think he was helping Clinton to win.

Paul is IMHO not a part of the ruling clique's apparatus. But I still agree with Itsalmosttoolate, that he doesn't really stand a chance. They'll kill him before he gets in if he does somehow win. But they've got election fraud systems with the voting machines. They've got the mass media to smear him. they've got so many ways of taking him down.

I still think it's fun to support Paul though.

1 Timothy 6:10 For the love of money is the root of all evil: which while some coveted after, they have erred from the faith, and pierced themselves through with many sorrows.

Red Jones  posted on  2007-11-07   7:08:14 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#20. To: Red Jones (#19)

Good analysis, Red, it seems only a world war or a Wall Street crash will bring dowm the puppet masters behind the curtain.

Ron Paul ought to watch his back, or he might pull a Ross Perot if his family is threatened.

Life is a tragedy to those who feel, and a comedy to those who think.

Zoroaster  posted on  2007-11-07   7:22:28 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#21. To: Sam Houston (#8)

Perot dropped out after being threatened by the CFR types (allegedly he had an in-person meeting with the 'chairman of the world' David Rockefeller w

Felix Royington was involved in the meeting too.

formerly GJones.

InsideJob  posted on  2007-11-07   8:11:37 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#22. To: Itisa1mosttoolate (#0)

two different contexts.

the extremely low approval ratings, records both, of congress and the president, make this time inherently different.

but if you look ahead, you can see where this is all going.

both political parties are dead in the water, both their core voters are disgusted, etc.

tipping point ahoy.

Gypsy woman said to me, one thing you must bear in your mind:
You are young and you are free, but damned if youre deceased in your own lifetime.

The Core, Eric Clapton

gengis gandhi  posted on  2007-11-07   8:19:08 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#23. To: Red Jones (#19)

I remember GHW Bush in a debate against Clinton in 1992 checking his watch in an exaggerated manner and pacing back & forth like a fool. the tv was focusing on that. I think he was helping Clinton to win.

I agree Red, I said Bush threw the election before the votes were taken ... I wonder what he's really been up to since then.

Look at Dole's pathetic campaign ... it's all fixed.

Ron Paul is the only candidate worth considering and who knows what the results might be if he would happen to win the nomination, considering the crooked electronic voting machines ?

"The mighty are only mighty because we are on our knees. Let us rise!" --Camille Desmoulins

noone222  posted on  2007-11-07   8:45:30 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#24. To: Itisa1mosttoolate (#0)

Ron Paul doesn't have a snow balls chance.

His chances are so bad that discussion of him had to be banned from Hannity's forum.

angle  posted on  2007-11-07   8:55:14 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#25. To: Zoroaster (#20)

if his family is threatened

It's not a question of if. Paul and his supporters are taking a big risk. The globalist fukks are ruthless in their pursuit for domination. The 'accidental' death of Paul or associates would just give 'em bad press from a few weeks. Paul Gillmor R-OH was offed a month or more back and it ain't even news, but it got the pubs and the dems on board for war now, didn't it?

angle  posted on  2007-11-07   9:01:12 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#26. To: Zoroaster (#20)

it seems only a world war or a Wall Street crash will bring dowm the puppet masters behind the curtain.

The puppet masters behind the curtain ARE the push for a World War and/or Wall St crash...

99 percent of lawyers give the rest a bad name.
Steven Wright

innieway  posted on  2007-11-07   9:01:18 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#27. To: angle (#24)

Many times people will go to any length to sow discord and negativism and then spend hours lamenting about politicians taking all their money. With some it is a disconnet between their brain and their mouth, with others it is intent.

Cynicom  posted on  2007-11-07   9:04:29 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#28. To: innieway (#26)

The puppet masters behind the curtain ARE the push for a World War and/or Wall St crash...

Excellent...

THEY are leading the orchestra.

Cynicom  posted on  2007-11-07   9:06:21 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#29. To: angle (#16)

My unoffical poll of college students indicates not a one would vote for Hitlery.

THAT'S one of the most exciting parts of it to me - seeing how many of our nation's YOUTH are seeing the bullshit, and are trying to do something about it. Gives me cause for hope...

99 percent of lawyers give the rest a bad name.
Steven Wright

innieway  posted on  2007-11-07   9:10:49 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#30. To: Itisa1mosttoolate (#0)

Ron Paul doesn't have a snow balls chance.

That's just defeatist BS, iatl. I guess you should take the "almost" out of your handle now, huh? Maybe this will snap you out of it:

Check out my blog, America, the Bushieful.

Arator  posted on  2007-11-07   9:41:55 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#31. To: Itisa1mosttoolate (#0)

Or this:

www.youtube.com/watch? v=lDIiQcCyuxU

Check out my blog, America, the Bushieful.

Arator  posted on  2007-11-07   9:45:55 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#32. To: Red Jones (#19)

I personally think that Perot through the election personally. He was leading both repubs & demos as you say, and then he self-destructed for some reason. I don't know if that was the plan from the beginning or if he was persuaded to do it.

President George Bush I put a hit out on him. Perot had criminal goods on Bush, and Perot's election would derail the elite's scheme for a totalitarian government with its cashless society, and the elite sitting back and raking in their dough by so-called "government" via e-money, the chip, et al. No one would be able to buy or sell, etc.

"The Octopus and the Physicist

Vincent A. LoDato, Ph.D.

Probably within a 20 year period, E-Money will come about or a unified one world currency. We will be using smart cards. At present the basic problem with these smart cards is that they can be duplicated.

In order to stop the duplication one must embed chips that cannot be duplicated. Hence it is imperative to have chips with design rules of the order of 0.1 microns and they must be mass produced in a cost effective manner. No technology exists today to produce these Dram, Asic, etc. chips in mass production.

The only way to do this is via an x-ray lithography process and a unique step and repeat tool. Such tools will cost over $15,000,000 per tool and would have an extremely high throughput with at least a 70% efficiency, and no one person, company or nation could buy one in an undetected fashion. There will be no more counterfeiting.

This is why this high cabal, need to control this chip making and the x-ray lithography process.

Several years ago the head of Sematech personally told me over the phone that there is to be only one stepper manufacturer in the world for x-ray aligners. I didn't understand it; and thought that it didn't make sense... but it does now.

These tools are the printing presses for E-MONEY, the plates are the masks, etc... and the boys must control them entirely...so gold etc will have a different place in the world as it has today.

There will be a global centralized bank with several information reserve banks controlling regions of the world. Chip Tatum hinted about "the Corporation" and this centralized Global banking system. He said the cabal has members living in Jupiter Island in Florida. We have found that Douglas Dillon has a summer house at Jupiter Island. (It is alleged that he has connections with the Dominica Non Secret Echelon Project--See lower notes.) If what Tatum wrote in his Pegasus file is correct, he connects the Bush family to the Corporation. Nevertheless, the "Corporation" that Tatums speaks about fits directly with Echelon, and the secret NON USA base in Dominica. Tatum states that our past President George Bush is pushing "this Idea" through his NWO agenda. He also shows a letter signed by George Bush authorizing some WET operations.

Here are excerpts from the Pegasus File:

I copied this directly from the site:

"The so-called Pegasus group's organizational structure as provided by Tatum, demands recounting in detail. The various presidential orders, which led to the formation and operation of the covert activities in which Tatium and others participated, are significant for they constitute a secret government within a government. This is the power that hides behind to open face of democratic government. Some have called this power base "the Octopus". Activities include high level narcotics trafficking, illegal transfers of ultra-high tech weaponry, money laundering on a massive scale and an odd "hit" or alignment to keep wobbly-kneed individuals on the straight and narrow."

"...the question remains:What did George Bush intend to do with his 'black' $3.8 billion. What was the ultimate purpose of the operation? Perhaps some of the money was to be used to grease palms and otherwise finance Bush's bid for the presidency following the completion of President Reagan's second term. Maybe it was used to finance other lucrative projects. Perhaps it was used to be used to inject finanical muscle into another, grander scheme, of which Tatum has recently spoken, involving George Bush's "scope and mission" paper for a New World Order.

A copy of the "scoping" paper supplied to Tatum by George Bush outlines the formation of a Corporation whose purpose is to "...provide a central network of information, analysts and strategists on an international basis in pursuit of world order and economic stability". The scope of the Corporation involves four features:

1)Centralization of informational services.

2)Analysis of data by region-specific analysts;

3)Provided recommendations based upon analysts' reports by international experts;

4)Provide international master plan for world growth and economic stability.

The Corporation is to be privately owned with a board of directors "consisting of Twelve members, elected annually by the shareholders. In addition there are five departments: "Data Resources, Political Management; Economic Management; Military Management; Environmental Management". 14

The foot note 14 in the Pegasus file says. It is impossible to judge the veracity of this document for a number of reasons. Principally, the name of the Corporation is not stated and the document itself is typed on blank A4 paper running for three pages. Readers must make of it what they will."

In another post it claims that Ross Perot was the target of this WET operation if he proceeded with his 1992 bid for the presidency. These are strong allegations. I have no way to check them out, but nevertheless they are published on the web. (And Chip Tatum has credence.) Further investigations are needed by law enforcement agencies.

Also here is a copy of the Chip Tatum letter allegedly signed by George Bush....we copied this off the internet..just copy paste and click to the site..had a hard time trying to direct link.

http://>www.accessone.com/~rivero/POLITICS/MENA/TATUM/EBush1a.gif">

VERY IMPORTANT TO CHECK THIS LINK SHOWS PRESIDENT BUSH'S SIGNATURE

Copied from the above site

"THE WHITE HOUSE

D G Chip Tatum Codename: Pegasus

You are hereby ordered into service of the United States Goverment.

It has been determined that [redacted], has illegally obtained documents which are of vital concern to the security of the United States and selected Allies of the United States. It has therefore been determined by Finding of the National Security Council that these documents must be recovered.

Due to this determination, you are authorized to use whatever means necessary to recover said documents and insure that this criminal is brought to justice. You are authorized to exceed existing regulations and FTM's to accomplish this mission.

If loss of life occurs as a result of the performance of your duties, you shall be exempt and protected from prosecution.

[Signature]

George Bush"

Is this letter real?

We came upon two sources that validated this letter for the following three reasons:

(1) No one in their right mind would publish "this" letter in public, unless it was true. It is a Federal Crime to forge U.S. government documents, especially those signed by the President of the USA, (2) The letter is undated, according to an internet source, by law an undated letter means an open operation with no date to terminate the operation, and finally (3) from another internet source who "personally knows" the Perot Family, the individual informed us, "the reason why Ross Perot dropped out the Presidential race of 1992 is because of this Letter, i.e. his life was threatened, and not by some Crazy group but "Via information from this Letter." Conclusion: this letter real and valid. (Is this what our country came too?...ordering a hit on a decent American????)

The Question arises: How did Ross Perot get these "Top Secret Documents" and did he violate his national security clearance?

It is a matter of public record that in the 1980s, President Regan asked Ross Perot to look into the MIA problem from the Vietnam War. Mr. Perot was given the highest clearance to check all government files. During the course of his investigation documents surfaced concerning Vice Present Bush and drug trafficing, the CIA etc. Mr. Perot realized that the Vice President at that time broke the law, and there were several confrontations.

Vice President Bush said he did what he did for national security reasons. Mr. Perot did not buy it, and realized that the Criminal Code of the USA was broken by the VP. He also knew..if a federal employee knows of a crime, he is obliged by law to report it and if not he, the employee, commits a criminal act himself.

Consequently Mr Perot followed the law and did not violate his security clearance or any laws of the USA. He was just trying to be a "good citizen." and a "good federal employee".

Remember Mr. Perot was a "special government employee" under President Regan, so he did report it. We are told that George Bush had Mr. Perot's security clearance pulled. When VP Bush became President he knew Ross Perot had documents that would incriminate him in these drug dealings etc. When Mr. Perot was going to run for president, this evidence was going to go public. In conclusion this is what precipitated the above letter.

Here is more about Chip Tatum, George Bush, and Ross Perot. This is copied from Nexus magazine:

PLANNING FOR RETIREMENT

Since 1985, when he first became aware of the Enterprise drug- smuggling, Tatum began collecting documents, audiotapes and videotapes for his "retirement". He was acutely aware that most deep-cover agents do not survive long in what is a very dirty game at a high-stakes poker table.

Tatum says that, in 1992, President Bush instructed him to "neutralize" presidential runner Ross Perot, but he refused to do so. Tatum turned over a copy of an incriminating tape to President Bush, explaining that it would not be released - providing that he, his family and Perot were kept safe. He also told the President that copies of the tape had been placed in six different locations worldwide, saying, "if I didn't contact these capsule-holders by a certain time each year, they are to be sent to the addresses on the packaging". He closed the conversation by stating that when he originally "placed the packages, I gave explicit instructions that if I asked for them to be sent back to me, they were to send them to the addresses on the packages." This, Tatum reasoned, would avoid intimidation or torture.

At present Chip Tatum has disappeared from sight, and his whereabouts unknown. ....."

The Octopus and the Physicist by Vince Lodato

http://www.totse.com/en/conspira...onal_analysis/162115.html

This is a story that doesn't get enough air time, IMO.

AllTheKings'HorsesWontDoIt  posted on  2007-11-07   9:53:09 ET  (1 image) Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#33. To: Red Jones (#19) (Edited)

It's more than fun to support Ron Paul, he's our only hope. Perot did not have the internet, he did not have the young people.

More importantly, Perot does not have the strong character than Ron Paul has. Perot has always been overly fond of money, starting with his marriage to a wealthy family.

Ron Paul for President - Join a Ron Paul Meetup group today!

robin  posted on  2007-11-07   9:53:50 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#34. To: robin (#33)

It's entirely different in terms of the war issue also.

I find that the older people are most likely to believe Sean Insanity and the other neocon talking heads who are whipping up these imaginary fears of an "Islamic Caliphate stretching from Indonesia to North Africa."

The young people will always flock to an antiwar candidate, for obvious reasons. I am old enough to remember the same phenomenon coalescing around such candidates as Robert Kennedy, Eugene McCarthy and George McGovern in the late 60s/early 70s.

What's discouraging is that none of them ever even came close to making it to the White House and one of the three was assassinated. Only one was even nominated by his party.

The adolescents/young adults of today just do not seem to have the same fire as those of the 1965-74 era. The dumbing-down of not just the youth, but the entire population has been breathtaking to behold.

“I would give no thought of what the world might say of me, if I could only transmit to posterity the reputation of an honest man.” - Sam Houston

Sam Houston  posted on  2007-11-07   10:03:11 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#35. To: Itisa1mosttoolate (#0)

I tend to agree, but perhaps the $4.5 million raised in one day will become the a seedling for a nationalistic movement which might gain political power (by any means necessary).

Jethro Tull  posted on  2007-11-07   10:08:46 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#36. To: Sam Houston (#34)

It's entirely different in terms of the war issue also.

Excellent point! I'll add that the aging baby-boomers see the similarities to Vietnam and just don't like ChickenHawks on principle.

Ron Paul for President - Join a Ron Paul Meetup group today!

robin  posted on  2007-11-07   10:12:37 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#37. To: Jethro Tull (#35)

I didn't mean to suggest I'm not for R Paul. I'm just trying to be pragmatic.

I thought you may see it the same way.

ps I hope I didn't spell anything wrong incorrectly.

"You can not save the Constitution by destroying it."

Itisa1mosttoolate  posted on  2007-11-07   10:20:11 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#38. To: Sam Houston (#8)

thanks for that info. I don't remember when it was that Ross Perot got his big payout from General Motors. But GM handled a deal with Perot in such a way that Perot made massive amounts of money. That could've been a payoff to Perot if it happened after the election. I think frequently Rockerfeller will give a carrot & a stick in his meetings like what you described.

1 Timothy 6:10 For the love of money is the root of all evil: which while some coveted after, they have erred from the faith, and pierced themselves through with many sorrows.

Red Jones  posted on  2007-11-07   19:47:40 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#39. To: noone222 (#23)

Look at Dole's pathetic campaign ... it's all fixed.

I remember that Dole through the election too. There was an event during that campaign that can only be explained by him doing that.

In the VP debate with Kemp & Gore I suppose Gore repeatedly accused that Dole backed legislation that would cause thousands of hospitals to go bankrupt. and Kemp just shuffled his feet in response with nothing to say. But then afterwards a big hospital association made it known that Gore's accusation was completely false, that their analysis of that legislation concluded no such thing. and then afterwards there was a debate between Dole & Clinton. and Clinton used the same exact accusation. and Dole had no answer whatsoever. And that is proof that Dole did not try to win that election. I mean if I knew about the hospital association saying it was a lie that they were saying, then how come Dole didn't?

1 Timothy 6:10 For the love of money is the root of all evil: which while some coveted after, they have erred from the faith, and pierced themselves through with many sorrows.

Red Jones  posted on  2007-11-07   19:51:39 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#40. To: Itisa1mosttoolate (#0)

Ron Paul doesn't have a snow ball's chance.

Perot started out spending from his own huge stack of money, and had elite media spin from day one.

" Junk is the ideal product... the ultimate merchandise. No sales talk necessary. The client will crawl through a sewer and beg to buy." - William S Burroughs

Dakmar  posted on  2007-11-07   20:00:06 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#41. To: Zoroaster (#20)

Ron Paul ought to watch his back, or he might pull a Ross Perot if his family is threatened.

Ron Paul wouldn't do that. He has too much integrity. He would expose the bastards that threatened his family to the world. Ron Paul almost seems too good to be true, that's what worries me about him. Who the heck is that perfect?

God is always good!

RickyJ  posted on  2007-11-07   21:33:24 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest