Freedom4um

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Resistance
See other Resistance Articles

Title: Spitting on the Troops ... 2007 Style
Source: The Fountain of Truth
URL Source: http://www.geocities.com/fountoftruth/spitting.html
Published: Dec 10, 2007
Author: Doug Newman
Post Date: 2007-12-10 21:56:34 by snoopdougg
Keywords: None
Views: 12754
Comments: 115

Mike Gaddy is a veteran of many years in the Army. He saw action in Vietnam, Grenada and Beirut. He currently lives in the Four Corners area of the Southwest and has

written numerous essays for LewRockwell.com that make for very worthwhile reading. Like a lot of veterans, life has taught him that huge numbers of soldiers, sailors, airmen and marines have made huge sacrifices over the years in the service of what turned out to be lies.

In a very recent column, he wrote the following:

“We came home [from Vietnam] to a misguided, ignorant nation who blamed its veterans for the mess our criminal politicians had gotten us into. An American population yelled obscenities at veterans who had been victims of unspeakable horrors when they met them at the airports and bus stations on their return home, but gave a pass to the politicians who sent them there.”

If any opponents of the War on Terror (WOT) are greeting returning troops in such a detestable fashion, I hereby issue the following demand, for whatever it might be worth: CEASE AND DESIST IMMEDIATELY! I am a retired Naval Reservist and I steadfastly maintain that the majority of those in uniform genuinely believe that they are doing a good work on our behalf.

The military, like any other segment of the government, grows and thrives based on the willingness of people to believe its propaganda. During my 17 years of involvement with the Navy – they let me retire early because of a relapse of a back injury – I seriously believed I was contributing to the defense of America and its freedom. Almost all of my shipmates believed likewise.

Like more and more veterans, living life and observing events have opened my eyes to the fact that I was being lied to. And, like more and more veterans, I am speaking up in the hope that Americans stop dying for lies. I love the Navy, but I hate what it is being used for nowadays.

As much as I oppose this WOT, I will give those who are doing the actual fighting this: they are making a sacrifice. They are sacrificing for the benefit of those who send them off to war. Some sacrifice more than others. Indeed, several thousand have made the ultimate sacrifice.

There are those who wage war and those who fight war. Most of the key players waging this current WOT – politicians, network talking heads, megachurch preachers and executives in the military-industrial complex – have never lifted a finger to do a day in the military. Very few have any kids in the active military.

More often than not, the fighting is done by kids from places such as South Central LA, the mining towns of West Virginia and the farms of Nebraska. Someone called the War Between the States “a rich man’s war and a poor man’s fight.” The WOT is no different.

And while they may not, in 2007, return home to spitting and obscenities, they are being spat upon in another, more offensive, way.

The people who so relentlessly beat the drums for war abroad -- and who are oh so outraged when anyone suggests ending the WOT -- are often the same people who tell us that we must sacrifice our liberty at home. They even admit that it is a paradox: in order to preserve our freedom, we must give up our freedom. While thousands fight and die for our freedom, we must give up your most basic constitutional guarantees of liberty here at home.

Terrorists do not threaten our liberty. After the 9/11 attacks, there was no follow-up. There were no invading armies, no naval battle groups in New York Harbor and the Potomac River and no aerial bombing raids. (1) Terrorists do not even control the government of Afghanistan, one of the poorest countries on earth. It has been centuries since a Muslim country conquered a non-Muslim country. This idea that radical Islamofascists pose any threat whatsoever to take over America is, to steal a phrase from GW Bush, an outrageous conspiracy theory.

Al Gore and the Left want us to freak out and go on Amish mode because of the junk science of global warming. GW Bush and the Right want us to freak out and submit to a police state because of the grossly exaggerated threat of terrorism. They are just two sides of the same totalitarian coin.

Millions of Americans are willing to believe these lies. I have had too many conversations with too many people over the last six years to think otherwise. It is bad enough that the government and its lapdog media want us to relinquish what is left of our freedoms. It is worse when millions of average Americans are more than happy to comply.

Here are just a few comments that stick out in my mind.

  • A girl in a Bible study: “They can search and spy on me!”
  • An old friend: “They are going to hit us again. You just can’t be too careful.”
  • A friend over beer and wings at a local sports bar: “Actually I'd be willing to give up a fair amount of my liberty for a time.”
  • A woman at Denver International Airport: “I know this security stuff is inconvenient, but I am SO GLAD they are doing it.”

I can’t believe that my experiences are that unique.

And then there are a those who will give up their liberty for a time and who expect to get it back in the future. I know of a group of people who gave up their liberty and got it back twelve years later: they were the German people of 1933-1945.

Millions of Americans are either silent about, in total denial of, or zealously promoting the Patriot Act, the Military Commissions Act, the John Warner National Defense Act and the numerous  executive orders and pending pieces of legislation designed to set up a full blown police state.

Some of the biggest support for this comes from Christians. Indeed, thousands of pastors have joined Clergy Response Teams whose purpose is to quell dissent should martial law be imposed. If they had any integrity, they would be preaching hellfire and brimstone against a government that would even dream of imposing martial law. But no-o-o-o-o-o-o. This might hurt attendance and jeopardize their 501c3 status.

These people who are so willing to give up what is left of our freedom – even for a short time -- are, in my opinion, worse than those protestors who spat on the troops returning from Vietnam and yelled at them calling them baby killers.

I can’t imagine thinking I was doing the right thing for my countrymen, making a huge sacrifice by fighting for their liberty in a foreign land, and coming home to find that they are more than willing to give up the very liberty that I had just risked my life for.

Oh sure, they wave those flags and have “Support the troops” bumper stickers on their cars and watch Fox News and listen to Drug Limburger and pray for the troops in church and say all the right things at bible study. But they have never even considered doing a day in the military and they don’t care one iota about the liberty for which so many have given so much. It makes my stomach do 360s.

The more I study, the more I believe that most of this nation’s wars have been contrived events. This does not minimize the sacrifice by those who fought in those wars. Most of them thought – idealistically and patriotically – they were doing the right thing. It is enough that they made such great sacrifices on someone else’s behalf. Let us not spit in their faces and desecrate their graves by relinquishing what liberty we have left.


(1) For the record, I do NOT buy the official story on 9/11. And it is not just Arkansas militia types, tin foil hat wearers and Haight-Ashbury hippies who agree with me. Type "truth about 911" into a search engine and you will see that it is also pilots, veterans, architects and engineers and people from all walks of life.


If you would like to post this, please e-mail me and include the above URL.


Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Comments (1-75) not displayed.
      .
      .
      .

#76. To: aristeides, robin, all (#34)

Knowing what you now know about Dennis Kucinich, do either of you suggest a coalition with a man like him is wise?

Jethro Tull  posted on  2007-12-12   10:23:12 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#77. To: Jethro Tull (#76)
(Edited)

I see no point in answering that question. What is wanted now is to build as large a coalition as possible behind Ron Paul. That means doing one's best to antagonize neither supporters nor opponents of Kucinich.

Many of us think that ending the war in Iraq and stopping wars of empire in general is the most important issue at the moment, to which everything else is secondary. To accomplish that, political alliances are necessary. It so happens that opponents of war on both ends of the political spectrum also oppose the Bush administration's unconstitutional power grabs. So that is an additional reason to ignore any differences that might exist on issues that, in comparison, are secondary.

To reason, indeed, he was not in the habit of attending. His mode of arguing, if it is to be so called, was one not uncommon among dull and stubborn persons, who are accustomed to be surrounded by their inferiors. He asserted a proposition; and, as often as wiser people ventured respectfully to show that it was erroneous, he asserted it again, in exactly the same words, and conceived that, by doing so, he at once disposed of all objections. - Macaulay, "History of England," Vol. 1, Chapter 6, on James II.

aristeides  posted on  2007-12-12   10:31:36 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#78. To: aristeides, FOH, IndieTX, all (#77)

I see no point in answering that question.

Actually that does answer my question.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2007-12-12   10:41:50 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#79. To: Jethro Tull (#78) (Edited)

And you have made it clear that you are not interested in advancing Ron Paul's campaign.

I see you had no response to my arguments.

Are you capable of reasoning or arguing?

To reason, indeed, he was not in the habit of attending. His mode of arguing, if it is to be so called, was one not uncommon among dull and stubborn persons, who are accustomed to be surrounded by their inferiors. He asserted a proposition; and, as often as wiser people ventured respectfully to show that it was erroneous, he asserted it again, in exactly the same words, and conceived that, by doing so, he at once disposed of all objections. - Macaulay, "History of England," Vol. 1, Chapter 6, on James II.

aristeides  posted on  2007-12-12   10:48:17 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#80. To: Jethro Tull (#76)

Knowing what you now know about Dennis Kucinich, do either of you suggest a coalition with a man like him is wise?

I know what Kucinich is about. He supports amnesty for illegal aliens. He supports slavery reparations. If he had his way he'd outlaw handguns and make it damn difficult to own longarms. And on top of that, he's a flaky guy who's hard to take seriously.

Having said that, I think that ending the war in Iraq and getting the neocons out of power is important enough of an issue that I support a coalition with ANYBODY. Since Kucinich opposed the war from day one and is the only one seriously pushing (deserved) impeachment for Bush and Cheney, he's on the side of a angels as far as I care.

Rupert_Pupkin  posted on  2007-12-12   10:52:05 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#81. To: Jethro Tull (#78)

Ron Paul Loves Kucinich.

To reason, indeed, he was not in the habit of attending. His mode of arguing, if it is to be so called, was one not uncommon among dull and stubborn persons, who are accustomed to be surrounded by their inferiors. He asserted a proposition; and, as often as wiser people ventured respectfully to show that it was erroneous, he asserted it again, in exactly the same words, and conceived that, by doing so, he at once disposed of all objections. - Macaulay, "History of England," Vol. 1, Chapter 6, on James II.

aristeides  posted on  2007-12-12   10:56:36 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#82. To: Rupert_Pupkin (#80)

RP, despite his wonderful positions, isn't going to win so linking arms with gun grabbers and other assorted misfits in some utopian coalition is a political wet dream. If anyone honestly believes he will be nominated I have some beachfront property in Indiana I’d like to sell them :)

Jethro Tull  posted on  2007-12-12   10:59:51 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#83. To: aristeides (#81)

Thanks for this. Just as I suspected RP is a Washington insider and given his friendship with Dennis Kucinich, someone not to be trusted. I'm very sorry I contributed to his effort. Had I known this before today, I'd be $200 dollars richer. Oh well, politicians by their nature are trash.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2007-12-12   11:07:04 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#84. To: Jethro Tull (#83)

Oh well, politicians by their nature are trash.

And what is one to call people who indicate they lack all interest in ending our wars of aggression?

To reason, indeed, he was not in the habit of attending. His mode of arguing, if it is to be so called, was one not uncommon among dull and stubborn persons, who are accustomed to be surrounded by their inferiors. He asserted a proposition; and, as often as wiser people ventured respectfully to show that it was erroneous, he asserted it again, in exactly the same words, and conceived that, by doing so, he at once disposed of all objections. - Macaulay, "History of England," Vol. 1, Chapter 6, on James II.

aristeides  posted on  2007-12-12   11:36:28 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#85. To: aristeides (#84)

My dear friend. In times like this a revolutionary is needed not a politician. And if you for even a moment think RP will be viable past South Carolina you're delusional. I can't help but recall how this forum, not long ago, was filled with information which documented voter fraud. Then, we all seemed to be in agreement that our system had been successfully snatched by the elites and their paperless voting trail. For whatever reason, presently, that lesson has been forgotten by most. I suppose the thrill of a good horse race is exciting for the gullible, even if deep down they know it's fixed. So run along and link arms with gun grabbing, illegal alien supporting scum. You deserve each other.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2007-12-12   11:47:29 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#86. To: Jethro Tull (#85)

The effect of postings like yours is to discourage people from attempting to make any change.

I am sure that the powers that be are delighted with such postings.

To reason, indeed, he was not in the habit of attending. His mode of arguing, if it is to be so called, was one not uncommon among dull and stubborn persons, who are accustomed to be surrounded by their inferiors. He asserted a proposition; and, as often as wiser people ventured respectfully to show that it was erroneous, he asserted it again, in exactly the same words, and conceived that, by doing so, he at once disposed of all objections. - Macaulay, "History of England," Vol. 1, Chapter 6, on James II.

aristeides  posted on  2007-12-12   11:50:14 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#87. To: aristeides (#86)

The kind of 'change' tools like you want originates in the bowels of Hell...

What North American Union? Don't wait - send Ron Paul 2008 some FRNs right NOW!

Tea Party '07

Have you seen THIS yet? Pass it around...

FOH  posted on  2007-12-12   11:52:23 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#88. To: FOH (#87) (Edited)

We already know you judge people by your musings on what you can extrapolate from what they do not say. A real fair way to judge people.

With that kind of KGB-type method of purging the ranks, what kind of change can we expect from the likes of you?

To reason, indeed, he was not in the habit of attending. His mode of arguing, if it is to be so called, was one not uncommon among dull and stubborn persons, who are accustomed to be surrounded by their inferiors. He asserted a proposition; and, as often as wiser people ventured respectfully to show that it was erroneous, he asserted it again, in exactly the same words, and conceived that, by doing so, he at once disposed of all objections. - Macaulay, "History of England," Vol. 1, Chapter 6, on James II.

aristeides  posted on  2007-12-12   11:53:58 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#89. To: aristeides (#88)

Go f*_ck yourself Commie-bozo...

My support for Ron Paul 2008 is as of this moment officially on hold until RP clarifies the "Kucinich" issue...


What North American Union? ~~~~~ Have you seen THIS yet? Pass it around...

FOH  posted on  2007-12-12   11:58:47 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#90. To: FOH (#89)

Uh, I think you're confused. It was the Communists who believed in purging the ranks.

To reason, indeed, he was not in the habit of attending. His mode of arguing, if it is to be so called, was one not uncommon among dull and stubborn persons, who are accustomed to be surrounded by their inferiors. He asserted a proposition; and, as often as wiser people ventured respectfully to show that it was erroneous, he asserted it again, in exactly the same words, and conceived that, by doing so, he at once disposed of all objections. - Macaulay, "History of England," Vol. 1, Chapter 6, on James II.

aristeides  posted on  2007-12-12   12:01:53 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#91. To: Jethro Tull (#85)

You have mail!

My support for Ron Paul 2008 is as of this moment officially on hold until RP clarifies the "Kucinich" issue...


What North American Union? ~~~~~ Have you seen THIS yet? Pass it around...

FOH  posted on  2007-12-12   12:15:33 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#92. To: FOH (#91) (Edited)

So that's how you organize your pack attacks, using this site's private mail?

How FReeperish of you and your bunch!

To reason, indeed, he was not in the habit of attending. His mode of arguing, if it is to be so called, was one not uncommon among dull and stubborn persons, who are accustomed to be surrounded by their inferiors. He asserted a proposition; and, as often as wiser people ventured respectfully to show that it was erroneous, he asserted it again, in exactly the same words, and conceived that, by doing so, he at once disposed of all objections. - Macaulay, "History of England," Vol. 1, Chapter 6, on James II.

aristeides  posted on  2007-12-12   12:22:54 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#93. To: aristeides (#86)

The effect of postings like yours is to discourage people from attempting to make any change.

If dead on honesty disturbs your, and anyone elses utopian dream, I know of a short pier in MD I would be happy to introduce you to :)

Jethro Tull  posted on  2007-12-12   12:24:15 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#94. To: Jethro Tull (#93)

I know of a short pier in MD I would be happy to introduce you to

You seem not to appreciate it when I give my honest opinions.

And your most un-Christian wish as to what I should do tells us an awful lot about your true character.

To reason, indeed, he was not in the habit of attending. His mode of arguing, if it is to be so called, was one not uncommon among dull and stubborn persons, who are accustomed to be surrounded by their inferiors. He asserted a proposition; and, as often as wiser people ventured respectfully to show that it was erroneous, he asserted it again, in exactly the same words, and conceived that, by doing so, he at once disposed of all objections. - Macaulay, "History of England," Vol. 1, Chapter 6, on James II.

aristeides  posted on  2007-12-12   12:27:58 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#95. To: aristeides (#94)

And your most un-Christian wish as to what I should do tells us an awful lot about your true character.

I think you're going goofy on us aristeides. I want to feed people to lions, not be eaten by one.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2007-12-12   12:31:02 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#96. To: Jethro Tull (#95)

I want to feed people to lions

There, you admitted it again!

To reason, indeed, he was not in the habit of attending. His mode of arguing, if it is to be so called, was one not uncommon among dull and stubborn persons, who are accustomed to be surrounded by their inferiors. He asserted a proposition; and, as often as wiser people ventured respectfully to show that it was erroneous, he asserted it again, in exactly the same words, and conceived that, by doing so, he at once disposed of all objections. - Macaulay, "History of England," Vol. 1, Chapter 6, on James II.

aristeides  posted on  2007-12-12   12:31:50 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#97. To: aristeides (#96)

Are you speaking in code again?

Jethro Tull  posted on  2007-12-12   12:33:09 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#98. To: Jethro Tull (#97)

Just citing your own words. They're quite damning enough.

To reason, indeed, he was not in the habit of attending. His mode of arguing, if it is to be so called, was one not uncommon among dull and stubborn persons, who are accustomed to be surrounded by their inferiors. He asserted a proposition; and, as often as wiser people ventured respectfully to show that it was erroneous, he asserted it again, in exactly the same words, and conceived that, by doing so, he at once disposed of all objections. - Macaulay, "History of England," Vol. 1, Chapter 6, on James II.

aristeides  posted on  2007-12-12   12:34:02 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#99. To: aristeides, Jethro Tull (#98)

Gentlemen, totally unseemly.

Cynicom  posted on  2007-12-12   12:37:02 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#100. To: aristeides (#98)

They're quite damning enough.

What have I posted that isn't true, or my very insightful opinion?

Jethro Tull  posted on  2007-12-12   12:37:55 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#101. To: Rupert_Pupkin (#80)

Having said that, I think that ending the war in Iraq and getting the neocons out of power is important enough of an issue that I support a coalition with ANYBODY. Since Kucinich opposed the war from day one and is the only one seriously pushing (deserved) impeachment for Bush and Cheney, he's on the side of a angels as far as I care.

I agree with you.

Kucinich is being subjected to the same shit slinging and denial of existance that Paul is. This is because on the one ultimate issue facing America and Americans Kucinich, like Paul, is on the contrary side from the Zionists and American Big business elite. That is the big picture upon which my focus shall remain.

There are many who Ron Paul would be more appropriately paired with but should it be Paul/Kucinich 2008 then that ticket would recieve my support.

In the event that Ron Paul fails to secure the Republican nomination, I shall be sorely disappointed if he then fails to run as a third party. It will probably be then that I give up on American politics.

Whatever happens, the Ron Paul phenomena has been and shall forever remain a positive development in American society and culture. It has opened a lot of eyes and I am proud to be a part of that.

Register to vote for Ron Paul NOW.

wbales  posted on  2007-12-12   12:45:52 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#102. To: wbales (#101)

A shining example of why America is screwed.

McCarthy was right...

My support for Ron Paul 2008 is as of this moment officially on hold until RP clarifies the "Kucinich" issue...


What North American Union? ~~~~~ Have you seen THIS yet? Pass it around...

FOH  posted on  2007-12-12   12:47:23 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#103. To: Jethro Tull (#100)

Careful there big boy, I think GI Jeebus is going to smite thee.

My hands are always dirty, but my conscience is always clean.

Esso  posted on  2007-12-12   12:49:42 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#104. To: FOH (#102)

My support for Ron Paul 2008 is as of this moment officially on hold until RP clarifies the "Kucinich" issue...

Then your support of Ron Paul was not that strong to begin with.

Register to vote for Ron Paul NOW.

wbales  posted on  2007-12-12   12:50:00 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#105. To: wbales (#104)

You have no idea what you're talking Commie-embracer...

My support for Ron Paul 2008 is as of this moment officially on hold until RP clarifies the "Kucinich" issue...


What North American Union? ~~~~~ Have you seen THIS yet? Pass it around...

FOH  posted on  2007-12-12   12:52:19 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#106. To: Jethro Tull, robin (#85)

My dear friend. In times like this a revolutionary is needed not a politician. And if you for even a moment think RP will be viable past South Carolina you're delusional.

Don't give up. It's not over yet.

And I don't understand why all this commotion concerning rank speculation over a possible Ron Paul running mate is occurring on this thread.

Register to vote for Ron Paul NOW.

wbales  posted on  2007-12-12   12:55:14 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#107. To: FOH (#105)

Commie-embracer...

Commie-embracer...

Register to vote for Ron Paul NOW.

wbales  posted on  2007-12-12   12:58:50 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#108. To: Cynicom (#99)

Gentlemen,....

Who came in? ;)

Law Enforcement Against Prohibition

"There is no 'legitimate' Corporation by virtue of it's very legal definition and purpose."
-- IndieTx

"Corporation: An entity created for the legal protection of its human parasites, whose sole purpose is profit and self-perpetuation." © IndieTx

IndieTX  posted on  2007-12-12   13:01:50 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#109. To: Esso, I'm taking book (#103)

God I can't get away from pie fights. And dammit, I wish I had even a morsel of hope regarding politics, but I don't. Five will get you ten I'm right about RPs candidacy. Any takers?

Jethro Tull  posted on  2007-12-12   13:05:12 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#110. To: wbales (#107)

Commie-embracer...

Commie-embracer...

Echo...Echo...Echo...

My support for Ron Paul 2008 is as of this moment officially on hold until RP clarifies the "Kucinich" issue...


What North American Union? ~~~~~ Have you seen THIS yet? Pass it around...

FOH  posted on  2007-12-12   13:17:30 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#111. To: IndieTX (#108)

Well, lets see, theres you and me and...uhhhhhh.

Cynicom  posted on  2007-12-12   14:18:34 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#112. To: Original_Intent (#66)

Well stated.

Thanks OI.

In the 5 minutes I spent standing at attention in front of his desk he never once raised his voice, never once used a 4 letter word, and when I left that office I was firmly convinced that I had just had my ass chewed by a true master of the art.

I hear you. Master indeed!

My folks could shred you to pieces with a look from another room. LOL!

Peppa  posted on  2007-12-12   14:50:32 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#113. To: aristeides (#75)

Who died and left you to decide what is "net etiquette". You were probably the little snot nosed tattle-tale on your block when you were younger.

You are nothing more than a complete douchbag.

I've already called him one on a prior thread. You don't see any "evidence" because your a complete socialist. Just a hair away, from the marxist badge he proudly wears.

As I've told a few here, and more so recently, in the future, do not ever post to me directly, do not reply to me directly, or reply or post to an article I've put up. If possible, put me on bozo so you won't be tempted. Thanks.

Mark

If America is destroyed, it may be by Americans who salute the flag, sing the national anthem, march in patriotic parades, cheer Fourth of July speakers - normally good Americans who fail to comprehend what is required to keep our country strong and free - Americans who have been lulled into a false security (April 1968).---Ezra Taft Benson, US Secretary of Agriculture 1953-1961 under Eisenhower

Kamala  posted on  2007-12-12   16:15:18 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#114. To: Kamala, Mekons4 (#113) (Edited)

Who died and left you to decide what is "net etiquette". You were probably the little snot nosed tattle-tale on your block when you were younger.

Oh, you think I tattle-taled when I pinged Mekons to let him know what you had said behind his back without letting him know?

I'd say I'm not the one who was acting in a sneaky way.

And who, may I ask, died and left you to decide who I should post to and who I should put on Bozo?

To reason, indeed, he was not in the habit of attending. His mode of arguing, if it is to be so called, was one not uncommon among dull and stubborn persons, who are accustomed to be surrounded by their inferiors. He asserted a proposition; and, as often as wiser people ventured respectfully to show that it was erroneous, he asserted it again, in exactly the same words, and conceived that, by doing so, he at once disposed of all objections. - Macaulay, "History of England," Vol. 1, Chapter 6, on James II.

aristeides  posted on  2007-12-12   16:18:38 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#115. To: Kamala (#113)

Since I now know somewhere you called me a Marxist or some shit, let's get this straight. I'm not a Marxist, I'm not a douchbag (sic), I'm not a commie. I'm a liberal with a libertarian streak, and above all an anti-Republican, at least in the state the party has been since Reagan took it over.

Learn to spell, learn to think, learn to be a decent human being, then come back when you have rehabilitated yourself. Douchbag (sic).

Honi soit qui mal y pense

Mekons4  posted on  2007-12-14   23:34:15 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest