The reason Kennedy was killed was, despite his faults, he was loyal to the United States not the Banking Cartel so they killed him.
Just like Lincoln.
Highly likely. Lincoln is greatly misunderstood by both his supporters and detractors. Lincoln was brilliant and he realized, I believe, that the Civil War was a war manufactured by interests who wanted to fractionate the United States.
There was a British Army in the North in Canada, and a Spanish Armada in the South ready to pounce and finish the disemberment of the United States had the South prevailed in breaking the Union in two. It is not that the South did not have valid concerns but that they could have been worked out short of war. The war was agitated, I believe, by foreign interests i.e., the Rothschilds. When the Union Forces prevailed and Lincoln still had a great Army of battle hardened veterans in the field they were staved off as to attack then would have been suicidal - for them.
The Rothschild family, like the unholy bloodsuckers they emulate, have grown fat and bloated on the blood of innocents. It is they and a handful of others of like mind (Rockefeller, Warburg, Brown, Harriman et. al., ...) who agitate, corrupt, and create the chaotic conditions and bloodshed upon which they feed.
"The difference between an honorable man and a moral man is that an honorable man regrets a discreditable act even when it has worked and he is in no danger of being caught." ~ H. L. Mencken
Why, yes that too. I particularly liked the snowballs, which if I recall my history correctly, played a part in the incident known as the "Boston Massacre" in 1770.
We have Chris "Hardball" Matthews, and now Sean "snowballs" Hannity.
Thank you I will do that. Thinking further about it I do recall Frank Caro. The problem with being a voracious reader that sometimes I don't catalog or make connections until I under pressure to do so. That is one of the reasons I like Internet forums - it forces me to think and make connections.
"The difference between an honorable man and a moral man is that an honorable man regrets a discreditable act even when it has worked and he is in no danger of being caught." ~ H. L. Mencken
In a comment made to a Columbia University class on Nov. 12, 1963, ten days before his assassination, President John Fitzgerald Kennedy allegedly said:
"The high office of the President has been used to foment a plot to destroy the American's freedom and before I leave office, I must inform the citizen of this plight."
"Another overlooked aspect of Kennedy's attempt to reform American society involves money. Kennedy apparently reasoned that by returning to the constitution, which states that only Congress shall coin and regulate money, the soaring national debt could be reduced by not paying interest to the bankers of the Federal Reserve System, who print paper money then loan it to the government at interest. He moved in this area on June 4, 1963, by signing Executive Order 11110 which called for the issuance of $4,292,893,815 in United States Notes through the U.S. Treasury rather than the traditional Federal Reserve System. That same day, Kennedy signed a bill changing the backing of one and two dollar bills from silver to gold, adding strength to the weakened U.S. currency.
Kennedy's comptroller of the currency, James J. Saxon, had been at odds with the powerful Federal Reserve Board for some time, encouraging broader investment and lending powers for banks that were not part of the Federal Reserve system. Saxon also had decided that non-Reserve banks could underwrite state and local general obligation bonds, again weakening the dominant Federal Reserve banks".
Caro's third volume was the best book I've ever read on how the Senate works.
To reason, indeed, he was not in the habit of attending. His mode of arguing, if it is to be so called, was one not uncommon among dull and stubborn persons, who are accustomed to be surrounded by their inferiors. He asserted a proposition; and, as often as wiser people ventured respectfully to show that it was erroneous, he asserted it again, in exactly the same words, and conceived that, by doing so, he at once disposed of all objections. - Macaulay, "History of England," Vol. 1, Chapter 6, on James II.
"The high office of the President has been used to foment a plot to destroy the American's freedom"
JFK said that? Hard to imagine what president he could have been talking about. Ike, Truman, FDR all seem unlikely, for various reasons.
To reason, indeed, he was not in the habit of attending. His mode of arguing, if it is to be so called, was one not uncommon among dull and stubborn persons, who are accustomed to be surrounded by their inferiors. He asserted a proposition; and, as often as wiser people ventured respectfully to show that it was erroneous, he asserted it again, in exactly the same words, and conceived that, by doing so, he at once disposed of all objections. - Macaulay, "History of England," Vol. 1, Chapter 6, on James II.
Another Boston snowball half-blinded the historian Prescott.
To reason, indeed, he was not in the habit of attending. His mode of arguing, if it is to be so called, was one not uncommon among dull and stubborn persons, who are accustomed to be surrounded by their inferiors. He asserted a proposition; and, as often as wiser people ventured respectfully to show that it was erroneous, he asserted it again, in exactly the same words, and conceived that, by doing so, he at once disposed of all objections. - Macaulay, "History of England," Vol. 1, Chapter 6, on James II.
"The high office of the President has been used to foment a plot to destroy the American's freedom"
JFK said that? Hard to imagine what president he could have been talking about. Ike, Truman, FDR all seem unlikely, for various reasons.
FDR was tied into the New York Mob Families - that is how he became the Governor of New York - where he then double crossed the Mob. So, how could he do that without powerful backing? The Mob and the Irish Gangs basically ran New York.
Truman was a Machine Politician and was controlled by Boss Pendergrast from the time he first ran for office till the time he retired. He was again a wholly owned operative who did what he was told under threat of "or else".
I know less about Ike as I have not dug into his background other than what I learned reading about Patton. Patton opposed the Death Camps that were set up AFTER WWII to liquidate the German POWs and IKE supported them. About 8 million Germans were "liquidated" in the aftermath of WWII. The Nuremburg Trials were Show Trials little different from Stalin's Show Trials. Albert Speer had his balls crushed to extract his confession. Prisoners were routinely tortured and I recall one German General (name eludes me at the moment) who signed a confession written in English when he was known only to speak German.
Which one? All of them of course.
"The difference between an honorable man and a moral man is that an honorable man regrets a discreditable act even when it has worked and he is in no danger of being caught." ~ H. L. Mencken
Thank you for the correction. I was flying from memory.
"The difference between an honorable man and a moral man is that an honorable man regrets a discreditable act even when it has worked and he is in no danger of being caught." ~ H. L. Mencken
The charge might be true, but would JFK have made it?
To reason, indeed, he was not in the habit of attending. His mode of arguing, if it is to be so called, was one not uncommon among dull and stubborn persons, who are accustomed to be surrounded by their inferiors. He asserted a proposition; and, as often as wiser people ventured respectfully to show that it was erroneous, he asserted it again, in exactly the same words, and conceived that, by doing so, he at once disposed of all objections. - Macaulay, "History of England," Vol. 1, Chapter 6, on James II.
"The difference between an honorable man and a moral man is that an honorable man regrets a discreditable act even when it has worked and he is in no danger of being caught." ~ H. L. Mencken
No United States president since Abraham Lincoln dared to go against the system and create his own money, as many of these so called elected presidents were actually only instruments or puppets of the Bankers. That is until President John F Kennedy came into Office.
Just perhaps someone will decide to take matters in their own hands. When that happens the government will then get to use all those laws to instill fear in Americans.
Let it be known that Warmonger Hannity is the first in retreat.
Cut and Run.
"I'd like to live just long enough to be there when they cut off your head and stick it on a pike as a warning to the next ten generations that some favors come with too high a price." Vir Cotto, Babylon 5
I know less about Ike as I have not dug into his background other than what I learned reading about Patton. Patton opposed the Death Camps that were set up AFTER WWII to liquidate the German POWs and IKE supported them. About 8 million Germans were "liquidated" in the aftermath of WWII. The Nuremburg Trials were Show Trials little different from Stalin's Show Trials. Albert Speer had his balls crushed to extract his confession. Prisoners were routinely tortured and I recall one German General (name eludes me at the moment) who signed a confession written in English when he was known only to speak German.
I didn't know about the Death Camps and 8 Million German POW's being murdered there after the war. Do you recall which books you read which revealed this scandal - and Ike approved the idea. What a horrid man!
Eisenhower was glad hander from day one of his military life. After West Point he latched onto General Fox Connor and used him to further his career into the right jobs.
Eisenhower was always junior to Patton until WW2 when he leaped over Patton and dozens of others, thanks to Marshall and Baruch.
Eisenhower was glad hander from day one of his military life. After West Point he latched onto General Fox Connor and used him to further his career into the right jobs.
Eisenhower was always junior to Patton until WW2 when he leaped over Patton and dozens of others, thanks to Marshall and Baruch.
Thanks, cyni. The more I learn about certain Presidents the more I am disillusioned. The good guys get snuffed or passed over and the evil ones win. In recent elections the choices we've had for Presidential candidates have been between evil or more evil. I really hope that once RP goes as far as he can go with the neoconTrotskyite GOP, that he considers runnning as an Independent 3rd Party. We really really need him in the White House. The mainstream sh*t that are running in the GOP/Dem are all scary or not very interesting. The GOP guys we know to be knaves and scoundrels but the Dems are just as bad in slightly different ways. When I watched the tail end of the Dem debate, I thought to myself - my God, there's slimey but very smart Edwards then there's the PTB annointed hormonal shrill Hillary, and jovial but not too smart Richardson, and finally there was Obama with his goofy glazed eyes saying nothing for fear of saying something that would spoil his astonishing popularity - I have no idea why people rave about Obama - he does not impress me whatsoever - he's very polite and seemingly sweet but anytime he opens his mouth I wonder how did this guy get accepted into Harvard??? Obama projects a bit of the Richardson pleasant but not too intellectually swift aura.
Another overlooked aspect of Kennedy's attempt to reform American society involves money.
And don't forget the other overlooked aspect of Kennedy was that he wanted to treat Israel ( aka Precioussssss)as a separate nation from us and a nation which needed to abide by UN rules - nuclear inspections. Kennedy's AmericaFirst approach to T.H.E. thug state was not very popular in certain quarters.
Eisenhower was always junior to Patton until WW2 when he leaped over Patton and dozens of others, thanks to Marshall and Baruch.
Patton was a magnificent warrior. My uncle served under and worshipped him.
But, IMHO, he was about half a head job. Eisenhower was one hell of an executive and leader of men. Not always, but ofttimes, the cream rises to the top.
Republicans (Democrats for that matter) ....... HAD ENOUGH?
