[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

A Comprehensive Guide To Choosing The Right Protein Powde

3-Time Convicted Violent Criminal Repeatedly Threatened to Kidnap and Kill Judge Cannon and Her Family

Candace Owens: Kamala Harris is not Black Â…

Prof. John Mearsheimer: Israel NOT Going To Win In Lebanon

Iran to destroy all Israel gas fields, power plants at once if Tel Aviv makes mistake: Deputy IRGC chief

Army Vet Calls Out FEMA for Prioritizing Migrants Over Hurricane Victims, Takes Matters Into His Own Hands

Unemployment among 25-34-year-olds with degrees nearly doubles in 4 months

Silver breaks 13-year resistance, signaling potential new secular trend

Two Ukrainian officials found with $6M cash, yet Hurricane Helene victims struggle for aid?

Elite colleges shocked: Students "Don't know how' to read books."

Is Washington's 'high threat' volcano about to blow? Scientists baffled by record spike in earthquakes around Mount Adams

FEMA whistleblowers revealed a treasonous misuse of taxpayer funds.

Exposing how useless FEMA is in Asheville, NC.

Kamala Harris Admin ARRESTED a man for bringing a helicopter full of supplies to Hurricane Helene victims.

MSNBC brings on an anti-Trump impeachment witness, only to be stunned when he announces he's voting for Trump.

She escaped the religious sect she grew up in. Now she says Trump’s MAGA movement is eerily similar

Federal Law REQUIRES Car Makers to MONITOR You

Candace Owens: When are you going to address this, KAMALA?

Democrats Celebrate a Seemingly Impressive September Jobs Report – What They are Not Telling You

The Boiling Point – America Have You Had ‘Enough,’ Yet?

Shopping Malls Implementing Curfews And Teen "Waiting Zones" To Try And Curb Chaos, Theft And Fights

US Public Debt Grew $115 Billion A Day For the Past 3 Days Totaling $345 Billion.

Dramatic Footage Shows Tanker Blown Up In Critical Maritime Chokepoint As Disasters Mount For Biden-Harris

The Remdesivir Papers: Did Service Members Deserve to Die?

“My Blood is Boiling”: Furious Elon Musk Goes Off on FEMA for Blocking SpaceX Engineers from Assisting

“The Stench is Unbearable”: Dead Bodies Piling Up, FEMA Abandons NC Residents Amid Hurricane Helene

Cash and the Constitution

Disaster Relief (INSIDER) Tells Why FEMA Won't Let Citizens Help.

The $212 Billion Dollar Food ingredient poisoning your Brain

"Last Election EVER" - Elon Musk vs Mark Cuban: Billionaires BATTLE Over Dangers If Trump Loses 2024


Ron Paul
See other Ron Paul Articles

Title: Ron Paul's Goodbye (Jeff Rense)
Source: Rense
URL Source: http://www.rense.com/general80/goodbye.htm
Published: Feb 9, 2008
Author: Jeff Rense
Post Date: 2008-02-10 17:10:32 by robin
Ping List: *Ron Paul for President 2008*     Subscribe to *Ron Paul for President 2008*
Keywords: None
Views: 26243
Comments: 501

Ron Paul's Goodbye

By Jeff Rense
2-9-8

The real issue now is that Ron Paul is effectively out of the race ....whether he directly came out and said it or not. In his statement of thanks to his supporters (see below), he also announced he's cutting his staff way back. The message is clear.
The last Ron Paul 'money bomb' showed a substantial loss of support momentum...which was/is largely the result of his complete public disassociation and denouncement of the entire 911 Truth Movement during that national 'debate' several weeks ago.

That was either a bald-faced, enormous, lie to try to keep himself politically 'alive' ... OR that is HIS truth.
Either way, it cost him a lot of support.
We know several Ron Paul backers who dropped him at that moment... and it was reflected in the failed, subsequent fundraising.
His poor showing (absolutely expected) in the primaries was the final truth his devoted supporters had to swallow: the system is totally owned and operated by the controllers. Period.

Many Paulites will now walk away from this obviously, hopelessly corrupt and manipulated political charade in America...and will never look back. Some will stay.
Ron announced."I am a Republican, and I will remain a Republican"and will not leave the party to run as an independent. (A Paul-Kucinich ticket would have at least been FUN).
WHAT Republican party?? That was a lamentable statement to read. Ron must be thinking it is still the Republican Party of the 19th century.

The Republican 'party' NOW stands for the BIG LIE, it stands for CRIME and DEATH, for GENOCIDE and PERVERSION, for TAXATION and GRAFT, for the FED and FINANCIAL RAPE, for DOMESTIC SPYING and the PATRIOT ACT, ...it stands for the end of LIBERTY and of our CONSTITUTION. Above all, it now stands for Zionism and WAR.
That statement alone probably ended about half of his remaining support. As we said many months ago, if he does NOT run as an independent, he will effectively put 'finis' to great portion of the majority of patriotic passion and commitment of the small, brave patriotic awakening he awakened in this rat hole political paradigm. And if the controllers are as smart as we think, they may well have orchestrated much of the 'Paul phenomena' to ultimately send the message, yet again, that 'resistance is futile!'
Ron said he needs to go home to Texas and work for his re-election to the House. That's a wise decision because the enemies of freedom and the Constitution, knowing all along he never had a chance in hell of gaining the nomination, will now try to unseat him...and they can do so if it be their will. Ask Cynthia McKinney.
So, even though he says he's 'still in the race' it is totally meaningless. Publicly, via his disassociation from 911 Truth, he is 'officially' standing shoulder-to-shoulder with Bush/Cheney and Zionism on 911.

He had a GREAT opportunity to bring 911 Truth forward during the campaign...and chose to hide it.
And, God forbid, if he really spoke HIS truth in the debate about the whole 911 issue, he is clearly, totally, disconnected from the biggest reality of our time: that 911 was an inside job.
Sad to see him give it up...but it was totally predictable and comes as no surprise. For his die-hard supporters and those who cherish America's nearly vanquished past magnificence, keep at it. Work at the local level...run for office... just know that the clock is ticking and the enemies of Freedom stand all around us and often in between us.

Of all the great American political leaders who sacrificed their lives for freedom, Ron chose, instead, to quote the zionist maniac killer Communist Trotsky about the 'revolution being permanent.' A strange choice. The statement could have been made without the need to acknowledge a Bolshevik madman.
In any case, the 'Ron Paul Revolution' is over... now just a footnote, an asterisk, in the grim record of these darkening times. Certainly, some will endeavor to carry on his themes...something the CIA/NSA supercomputer models knew and predicted long ago.
Ron Paul is a grand anachronism...a principled man out of time, as it were. He truly made a difference. And for that we owe him much.

Ron Paul - 'There Will Be
No Third Party Run'
Turns Attention To Keeping His Congressional Seat

Message from Ron Paul
2-9-8
Whoa! What a year this has been. And what achievements we have had. If I may quote Trotsky of all people, this Revolution is permanent. It will not end at the Republican convention. It will not end in November. It will not end until we have won the great battle on which we have embarked. Not because of me, but because of you. Millions of Americans -- and friends in many other countries -- have dedicated themselves to the principles of liberty: to free enterprise, limited government, sound money, no income tax, and peace. We will not falter so long as there is one restriction on our persons, our property, our civil liberties. How much I owe you. I can never possibly repay your generous donations, hard work, whole-hearted dedication and love of freedom. How blessed I am to be associated with you. Carol, of course, sends her love as well.

Let me tell you my thoughts. With Romney gone, the chances of a brokered convention are nearly zero. But that does not affect my determination to fight on, in every caucus and primary remaining, and at the convention for our ideas, with just as many delegates as I can get. But with so many primaries and caucuses now over, we do not now need so big a national campaign staff, and so I am making it leaner and tighter. Of course, I am committed to fighting for our ideas within the Republican party, so there will be no third party run. I do not denigrate third parties -- just the opposite, and I have long worked to remove the ballot-access restrictions on them. But I am a Republican, and I will remain a Republican.
I also have another priority. I have constituents in my home district that I must serve. I cannot and will not let them down. And I have another battle I must face here as well. If I were to lose the primary for my congressional seat, all our opponents would react with glee, and pretend it was a rejection of our ideas. I cannot and will not let that happen.
In the presidential race and the congressional race, I need your support, as always. And I have plans to continue fighting for our ideas in politics and education that I will share with you when I can, for I will need you at my side. In the meantime, onward and upward! The neocons, the warmongers, the socialists, the advocates of inflation will be hearing much from you and me.
Sincerely,

Ron
Subscribe to *Ron Paul for President 2008*

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Cynicom, buckeye, _______, Peppa, Hayek Fan, christine (#0)

Of all the great American political leaders who sacrificed their lives for freedom, Ron chose, instead, to quote the zionist maniac killer Communist Trotsky about the 'revolution being permanent.' A strange choice. The statement could have been made without the need to acknowledge a Bolshevik madman.

Ron Paul for President - Join a Ron Paul Meetup group today! The Revolution will not be televised!
I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it.-T Jefferson

robin  posted on  2008-02-10   17:12:09 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: All (#1)

from a poster at godlikeproductions:

Who is Trotsky?

This was found from another site, not to be referenced to here, but this part was interesting. Can anyone decipher for those that aren't as versed in history?

Follow me closely now. When someone is kidnapped, and they are being closely watched by their captors, they TRY to get the word out. At first, to an onlooker, it doesn’t make sense what they say or do. But then, maybe, someone understands the person is in trouble and is crying out for help. Thanks to JEFF RENSE, if for nothing else, pointing out the ANOMALY of Ron Paul quoting Trotsky, whose demented brain fomented the Russian Revolution of 1917. Ron Paul would normally NEVER quote Trotsky to encourage his followers. The Revolution of Dr. Paul is not a “revolution” which sends millions to the Gulag or deliberately starves farmers in the Ukraine. GET THE PICTURE? Ron Paul is letting us know, in the only way he can, that he has been forced out. He has been threatened, and he has been elbowed out of the race by THUGS. Think-Think-Think-Think! It is so important now that we face this Government Mafia and tell America.

WE ARE UNDER SIEGE!

Ron Paul for President - Join a Ron Paul Meetup group today! The Revolution will not be televised!
I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it.-T Jefferson

robin  posted on  2008-02-10   17:18:57 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: robin (#1)

Until I hear otherwise, I'm taking this as Ron Paul's blogger's goodbye. I hope he is fired forthwith.

buckeye  posted on  2008-02-10   17:19:08 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: buckeye (#3)

So far all we have is one blogger who claims he has an email from Carol Paul that this was not written by Dr. Paul. That's not much to go on considering that message is on the front page of his campaign website as we type.

Ron Paul for President - Join a Ron Paul Meetup group today! The Revolution will not be televised!
I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it.-T Jefferson

robin  posted on  2008-02-10   17:20:38 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: All (#1)

WHAT Republican party?? That was a lamentable statement to read. Ron must be thinking it is still the Republican Party of the 19th century.

The Republican 'party' NOW stands for the BIG LIE, it stands for CRIME and DEATH, for GENOCIDE and PERVERSION, for TAXATION and GRAFT, for the FED and FINANCIAL RAPE, for DOMESTIC SPYING and the PATRIOT ACT, ...it stands for the end of LIBERTY and of our CONSTITUTION. Above all, it now stands for Zionism and WAR.

That statement alone probably ended about half of his remaining support.

Another one bites the dust
Another one bites the dust
And another one gone, and another one gone
Another one bites the dust

Jethro Tull  posted on  2008-02-10   17:20:58 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: robin (#0)

The Republican 'party' NOW stands for the BIG LIE, it stands for CRIME and DEATH, for GENOCIDE and PERVERSION, for TAXATION and GRAFT, for the FED and FINANCIAL RAPE, for DOMESTIC SPYING and the PATRIOT ACT, ...it stands for the end of LIBERTY and of our CONSTITUTION. Above all, it now stands for Zionism and WAR. That statement alone probably ended about half of his remaining support.

Long live the Queen.

_______  posted on  2008-02-10   17:24:05 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: robin, Peppa (#4)

That's not much to go on considering that message is on the front page of his campaign website as we type.

I hear ya, robin. I'm taking a wait and see approach. Meanwhile it's been very interesting to see the reactions around the internet.

buckeye  posted on  2008-02-10   17:24:28 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: Jethro Tull, robin, All (#5)

I said from the beginning that Pauls swan song was a total contradiction to everything he has ever said and stood for, a total contradiction.

If Paul did in fact write it, then he has pulled off the con job of the century in American politics.

Cynicom  posted on  2008-02-10   17:30:46 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: Cynicom, Jethro Tull (#8)

Check post #2, which I got from godlikeproductions....

freedom4um.com/cgi-bin/re...gi?ArtNum=73123&Disp=2#C2

Ron Paul for President - Join a Ron Paul Meetup group today! The Revolution will not be televised!
I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it.-T Jefferson

robin  posted on  2008-02-10   17:32:45 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: robin (#9)

Check post #2, which I got from godlikeproductions....

I did.

Recall Perot had "problems" he could never explain to anyones satisfaction?

Cynicom  posted on  2008-02-10   17:35:00 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: Cynicom (#10)

Recall Perot had "problems" he could never explain to anyones satisfaction?

Yes, I do remember.

Ron Paul for President - Join a Ron Paul Meetup group today! The Revolution will not be televised!
I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it.-T Jefferson

robin  posted on  2008-02-10   17:36:15 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: buckeye (#7)

I'm taking a wait and see approach. Meanwhile it's been very interesting to see the reactions around the internet.

I think Rense's piece if off base. I understand the Paul's were to be at a rally today, (according to the thread at the RP forum). This is apparently unacceptable in this case, and therefore is perfect timing to kneecap RP when he can't react. So what have we? Tos4?

Peppa  posted on  2008-02-10   17:37:08 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: robin (#9)

One thing that does lend some measure of credence to the idea Paul was used, it is now too late for Americans/true conservatives to mount any election effort.

The stage is set as the elite prepared it for McCain and Clinton and whatever baggage they bring along.

Cynicom  posted on  2008-02-10   17:38:48 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: robin, *CAFR*, *Agriculture-Environment*, *9-11*, *Big Pharma* (#0)

His poor showing (absolutely expected) in the primaries was the final truth his devoted supporters had to swallow: the system is totally owned and operated by the controllers. Period.

Reality is a bitch, and she lives in Washington, DC, and has since 1789. For those of you who are unaware of what that means, Washington, DC, did not exist in 1789. What this means is that the bitch lives in the Constitution, which formed Washington, DC..

There have been a number of actions over the years that tell us what is neccessary for 'them'; every action making more and more people eligiable to vote. That should tell you that all that is neccessary in 'their' system is that enough people participate to give the illusion of democracy.

I will repeat something that I have said before, constantly; the only thing that matters is local control. If you do not have control of your local area, the control of something as far away as DC is impossible. That is also the foundation of the government of God, as explained in the Bible; local control, through the family.

And as long as you permit 'them' to convince you that, somehow, through 'just one more election,' WE CAN WIN! You will continue to lose, because it focuses your attention where it does not belong. On national politics.

If this were a true republic, there would be no national races, or, national politics. That is a simple truth, and unless you begin to understand and accept that, nothing will or can change. I will also admit that it is probably to late for anything to now make a difference, expect seeing as well as possible to the welfare of your family.

And before someone argues with me about this, I would suggest that you check into the numerous Presidents of the united States that served before George the First Washington, and how they were 'elected.'

When a man who is honestly mistaken hears the truth, he will either quit being mistaken or cease to be honest.

richard9151  posted on  2008-02-10   17:40:40 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: Peppa (#12)

Jeff Rense wrote this yesterday.

If you think we have been conspiring all along against Ron Paul's campaign then you must live on another planet.

Ron Paul for President - Join a Ron Paul Meetup group today! The Revolution will not be televised!
I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it.-T Jefferson

robin  posted on  2008-02-10   17:41:09 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: Peppa (#12)

I think Rense's piece if off base. I understand the Paul's were to be at a rally today, (according to the thread at the RP forum). I think Rense's piece if off base. I understand the Paul's were to be at a rally today, (according to the thread at the RP forum).

Pep...

You mean for us to accept that Paul is running for President of the United States and has NO ONE minding the store????? His hired slicks are not that stupid or incompetent.

Cynicom  posted on  2008-02-10   17:41:23 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#17. To: Cynicom (#13)

IMO, the best we can hope for is Obama.

Ron Paul for President - Join a Ron Paul Meetup group today! The Revolution will not be televised!
I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it.-T Jefferson

robin  posted on  2008-02-10   17:42:11 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: richard9151 (#14)

And before someone argues with me about this And before someone argues with me about this

richard...

Now you are joining the "revelation" gang and that gets quite boring.

Cynicom  posted on  2008-02-10   17:43:53 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: robin (#15)

Jeff Rense wrote this yesterday.

If you think we have been conspiring all along against Ron Paul's campaign then you must live on another planet.

I think there are many quesitonable behaviours, but the deed has been done. If Rense has not the sense to question if it was written by RP to begin with, or at least a suspicion that something was amiss, I can't say it's any more fair to give credit to Jeff, that which was not extended to Ron Paul.

Peppa  posted on  2008-02-10   17:44:51 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#20. To: Cynicom (#16)

Pep...

You mean for us to accept that Paul is running for President of the United States and has NO ONE minding the store????? His hired slicks are not that stupid or incompetent.

Totally incompetent.

You're right to dump him and the history covered with blood that goes with him.

Peppa  posted on  2008-02-10   17:46:09 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#21. To: Peppa (#19)

His last message with the Trotsky quote is STILL ON HIS CAMPAIGN WEBSITE. It was written on Feb. 8th. This is the 10th.

Ron Paul for President - Join a Ron Paul Meetup group today! The Revolution will not be televised!
I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it.-T Jefferson

robin  posted on  2008-02-10   17:46:14 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#22. To: robin (#17)

IMO, the best we can hope for is Obama.

Wow, that was quick! :)

Peppa  posted on  2008-02-10   17:46:40 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#23. To: robin (#17)

IMO, the best we can hope for is Obama.

Obama was manufactured by our ruling government, he is their Dracula.

His untold millions of dollars is not appearing out of thin air.

Cynicom  posted on  2008-02-10   17:46:55 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#24. To: robin (#21)

His last message with the Trotsky quote is STILL ON HIS CAMPAIGN WEBSITE. It was written on Feb. 8th. This is the 10th.

Guess we've been had.

Peppa  posted on  2008-02-10   17:47:26 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#25. To: Peppa (#20)

You're right to dump him and the history covered with blood that goes with him.

Uhhhh, dont look now but your comprehension is showing again.....

Ron Paul WROTE the email, he dumped us. It is signed love and kisses, Ron.

Cynicom  posted on  2008-02-10   17:49:24 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#26. To: Peppa (#24)

Read post #2, perhaps RP had some outside pressure.

Ron Paul for President - Join a Ron Paul Meetup group today! The Revolution will not be televised!
I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it.-T Jefferson

robin  posted on  2008-02-10   17:50:17 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#27. To: Cynicom (#25)

Ron Paul WROTE the email, he dumped us. It is signed love and kisses, Ron.

Yep. You've no doubt got the proof. You win.

Peppa  posted on  2008-02-10   17:51:17 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#28. To: robin (#26)

Read post #2, perhaps RP had some outside pressure.

If I recall correctly, Perot had threats concerning a daughter or some such, he was never able to dispel the doubts that remained.

Cynicom  posted on  2008-02-10   17:51:40 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#29. To: robin (#26)

Read post #2, perhaps RP had some outside pressure.

Duly noted.

Peppa  posted on  2008-02-10   17:51:58 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#30. To: robin (#0)

So, even though he says he's 'still in the race' it is totally meaningless. Publicly, via his disassociation from 911 Truth, he is 'officially' standing shoulder-to-shoulder with Bush/Cheney and Zionism on 911.

IOW....

You're either with us, or your with the terrorists.....

It's kind of pathetic to see people getting up on their high horse and blaming Ron Paul for not winning, washing their hands as though they are perfect and if it was THEM running for prez, they would have done it right and won the election.

Suddenly, Ron Paul is garbage.

Modern day pharisee this guy is....

Pinguinite.com EcuadorTreasures.ec

Pinguinite  posted on  2008-02-10   17:52:04 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#31. To: robin, Cynicom (#11)

Recall Perot had "problems" he could never explain to anyones satisfaction?

Yes, I do remember.

Please, I mean, really!

What no one seems to understand is that Perot's wife is a Birminghan, of the British Birminghams, and big, big, big in international banking. Which is where Perot's connections started that made him so wealthy.

'get it'?

When a man who is honestly mistaken hears the truth, he will either quit being mistaken or cease to be honest.

richard9151  posted on  2008-02-10   17:52:08 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#32. To: Cynicom (#18)

Now you are joining the "revelation" gang and that gets quite boring.

Just get your facts straight before telling me I am wrong. That is all that I ask.

When a man who is honestly mistaken hears the truth, he will either quit being mistaken or cease to be honest.

richard9151  posted on  2008-02-10   17:53:38 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#33. To: Peppa, Cynicom (#22)

The lesser of two or three evils is better than the worst evil. Obama strikes me as somewhat outside the system, a more Jimmy Carter type of Democrat. Others have said so too. I'm not even convinced he would be all that bad. A couple days ago I asked the question, can someone tell me why I should not support Obama, given that we are looking at McCain for the GOP nominee.

I'm a realist, and McCain would be "Bush on steroids" according to many.

Ron Paul for President - Join a Ron Paul Meetup group today! The Revolution will not be televised!
I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it.-T Jefferson

robin  posted on  2008-02-10   17:53:54 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#34. To: Peppa (#27)

Yep. You've no doubt got the proof. You win.

Win????

Good heavens Pep, I have lost big time, you have lost, America has lost. Ron Paul was my last hope. I do not have the luxury of time to wait years for change, wait for the sheep to awaken, wait until it is too late.

Ron Paul was the last life raft leaving the Titanic and he shoved off saving himself. That is you and me standing at the rail, with nothing.

Cynicom  posted on  2008-02-10   17:56:20 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#35. To: Pinguinite (#30)

It's kind of pathetic to see people getting up on their high horse and blaming Ron Paul for not winning,

That's not why. His last Message from Ron, besides including a Trotsky, was about how he is trimming back his campaign staff and concentrating on winning his congressional seat. He said since Romney quit, there is no hope for a brokered convention.

He basically said he quits.

Ron Paul for President - Join a Ron Paul Meetup group today! The Revolution will not be televised!
I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it.-T Jefferson

robin  posted on  2008-02-10   17:56:48 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#36. To: Peppa (#12)

So what have we?

I'm really trying not to read too much into all this. I already knew that the deck was stacked. I already knew that the voting machines were hacked. My big problem here is that I watched his late January message and he said he was in it until the end. He's gotten $5 million since the start of this quarter, so I don't know why he would think he isn't getting enough support, as that's what he said he required.

I really wanted a third party run to give the American people a chance to write in his name. I wanted him to outdo Perot. I figured he had a chance outside the GOP machinery.

So I'm just waiting. I don't blame you for being frustrated with the cynics. I don't blame them for being cynical, either. Rense makes a good point about the 9/11 truth movement, but if Ron Paul decided not to speak out on the issue because he wanted to hang on to normalcy, that may have only been part of his alleged undoing, not the whole thing.

About 4, the freedom to express comes with the freedom to disagree. I'm grateful for the variety of opinions.

buckeye  posted on  2008-02-10   17:57:13 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#37. To: richard9151 (#32)

Just get your facts straight before telling me I am wrong. That is all that I ask.

Your facts are only too correct. Nowhere did I say otherwise.

Cynicom  posted on  2008-02-10   17:57:45 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#38. To: robin (#33)

Jimmy Carter type of Democrat. Others have said so too.

I'll get my Obama sticker right now!

Peppa  posted on  2008-02-10   17:58:29 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#39. To: Peppa (#38)

I'll get my Obama sticker right now!

Tut tut now. Lets not jump overboard into the cold water.

Cynicom  posted on  2008-02-10   18:01:03 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#40. To: Pinguinite (#30)

You're either with us, or your with the terrorists.....

Very interesting criticism. If you don't (hate, recognize the depth of the conspiracy, feel oppressed, or aren't disenfranchised) enough, you aren't worthy.

buckeye  posted on  2008-02-10   18:01:59 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#41. To: Peppa, Cynicom (#38)

I never suggested that!

But in Nov., if my state looks like it is going to McCain, I will vote for Obama, if he is the nominee. Otherwise I'll vote my conscience, Constitution Party.

Ron Paul for President - Join a Ron Paul Meetup group today! The Revolution will not be televised!
I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it.-T Jefferson

robin  posted on  2008-02-10   18:02:39 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#42. To: buckeye (#36)

I'm really trying not to read too much into all this. I already knew that the deck was stacked. I already knew that the voting machines were hacked. My big problem here is that I watched his late January message and he said he was in it until the end. He's gotten $5 million since the start of this quarter, so I don't know why he would think he isn't getting enough support, as that's what he said he required.

I really wanted a third party run to give the American people a chance to write in his name. I wanted him to outdo Perot. I figured he had a chance outside the GOP machinery.

So I'm just waiting. I don't blame you for being frustrated with the cynics. I don't blame them for being cynical, either. Rense makes a good point about the 9/11 truth movement, but if Ron Paul decided not to speak out on the issue because he wanted to hang on to normalcy, that may have only been part of his alleged undoing, not the whole thing.

About 4, the freedom to express comes with the freedom to disagree. I'm grateful for the variety of opinions.

Understood.

We simply wait for the thunder.

Peppa  posted on  2008-02-10   18:03:21 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#43. To: buckeye (#36)

So I'm just waiting. I don't blame you for being frustrated with the cynics.

Whizzzzz. I dodged that zinger.

I agree with what you say. Read what richard is saying. He has the fix put in years ago and you call me a cynic????

Cynicom  posted on  2008-02-10   18:04:06 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#44. To: robin (#26)

Read post #2, perhaps RP had some outside pressure.

???

What more pressure is needed than looking at the current delegate count?

Or maybe the funding?

We've believed Ron has been a man of conscience all these years, never making backroom deals with other congressmen or voting for pork benefiting his own district, and now we're to consider the possibility that someone successfully applied covert pressure on Ron Paul to stop actively campaigning?

I don't see how that could be in the cards. It just does not fit the Ron Paul profile. And there's no more pressure needed than looking at the stats right now. Ron's always been a practical, realistic guy, and the stats are not in his favor in terms of winning. He's done well, better than most of the original GOP contenders.

Witch hunting is out of order here.

Pinguinite.com EcuadorTreasures.ec

Pinguinite  posted on  2008-02-10   18:04:29 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#45. To: robin (#41)

Constitution Party.

Only, no other. I will be watching you.

Cynicom  posted on  2008-02-10   18:05:04 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#46. To: robin (#41)

I never suggested that!

But in Nov., if my state looks like it is going to McCain, I will vote for Obama, if he is the nominee. Otherwise I'll vote my conscience, Constitution Party.

Mission accomplished.

Peppa  posted on  2008-02-10   18:05:41 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#47. To: Pinguinite (#44)

Witch hunting is out of order here.

You need to wrestle with richard then, he has the inside story.

Cynicom  posted on  2008-02-10   18:06:54 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#48. To: Cynicom (#34)

Ron Paul was the last life raft leaving the Titanic and he shoved off saving himself. That is you and me standing at the rail, with nothing.

Ron Paul is not saving himself. He'll have to live with the same president as the rest of the USA next year, and he certainly isn't leaving anyone in any worse shape than they were in before he declared his candidacy.

You really need to get some correct context here, Cyni!

Pinguinite.com EcuadorTreasures.ec

Pinguinite  posted on  2008-02-10   18:08:25 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#49. To: robin, Peppa, Cynicom (#41)

Both Obama and his wife are CFR members. He's just younger and appears less power-hungry than Hillary. Remember, globalism is all about hope for humanity. It's not a hateful endeavor. But some of them believe they can do cruel and otherwise evil things to accomplish their aims, because anyone standing in the way is obstructing progress toward utopia. I say they work for the same team, and the team employs the same goon squads regardless of candidate. Once they know they can use one as a puppet, all obstacles are removed one way or another.

buckeye  posted on  2008-02-10   18:08:28 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#50. To: Pinguinite (#44)

I'm not suggesting a witch hunt. If he chooses to end his campaign now, I would like to hear him say that he is NOT endorsing McCain.

Ron Paul for President - Join a Ron Paul Meetup group today! The Revolution will not be televised!
I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it.-T Jefferson

robin  posted on  2008-02-10   18:09:56 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#51. To: Pinguinite (#48)

You really need to get some correct context here, Cyni!

Context?? Inferring stupidity needs no context.

richard has a revelation, you say no witch hunting, that leaves the rest of us somewhere in between.

Cynicom  posted on  2008-02-10   18:10:55 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#52. To: buckeye (#49)

I did not say Obama was a first choice, I said he is far better and safer than McCain.

He has ZBig and the Kennedys behind him.

Ron Paul for President - Join a Ron Paul Meetup group today! The Revolution will not be televised!
I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it.-T Jefferson

robin  posted on  2008-02-10   18:11:22 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#53. To: buckeye (#49)

Both Obama and his wife are CFR members.

buck...

Millions of dollars pouring into Obama with little effort is not manna from heaven. It was earmarked in care of Obama.

Cynicom  posted on  2008-02-10   18:13:09 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#54. To: robin (#35)

He basically said he quits.

I understand that, of course. He is basically shifting from an active candidate to a passive candidate, and doing it because Romney effectively withdrew from the race, greatly reducing the chance of a brokered convention. Since a BC is (was) the only hope of Ron getting the nomination, then no BC = no victory. Ergo, he's shifting gears accordingly.

Ron is a practically minded guy. A lot of us are too.

Why are some considering this reference to Trotsky as some covert, secret sign that Ron Paul is part of the huge conspiracy instead of just accepting it as some inert reference to something quite plain?

Pinguinite.com EcuadorTreasures.ec

Pinguinite  posted on  2008-02-10   18:14:25 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#55. To: Cynicom (#53)

Obama has a grassroots appeal. Soros also backs him. He is something of a maverick, whatever else he is.

Ron Paul for President - Join a Ron Paul Meetup group today! The Revolution will not be televised!
I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it.-T Jefferson

robin  posted on  2008-02-10   18:15:06 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#56. To: Pinguinite (#54) (Edited)

that Ron Paul is part of the huge conspiracy

no, that's not was suggested to my understanding, but that he is signaling he was forced out

You must admit it was very out of character.

Remember, McCain called RP "the spoiler".

Ron Paul for President - Join a Ron Paul Meetup group today! The Revolution will not be televised!
I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it.-T Jefferson

robin  posted on  2008-02-10   18:16:26 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#57. To: Cynicom, richard9151 (#43)

He has the fix put in years ago and you call me a cynic?

I'm trying to be the peace maker here. I think all of you, including Richard, are very interesting and well worth considering on any given issue. Richard and others on the subject of embedded nullification of the Constitution are very interesting, and yes, very cynical. Much more cynical than you. I'm just amazed that we have the freedom still to express these kinds of ideas.

buckeye  posted on  2008-02-10   18:17:52 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#58. To: Pinguinite (#54)

Ron is a practically minded guy. A lot of us are too.

I contact Pauls legislative office and they have a standard put off.."We do not answer emails from non constituents"...

Then I get an email from "Ron" and one from "Carol", please send money so I may save my seat in the house.

Practical? Trying to con more money from his loyal supporters? And richard says they are wealthy beyond our imagination. One of or both of you are wrong.

Cynicom  posted on  2008-02-10   18:19:58 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#59. To: robin (#41)

But in Nov., if my state looks like it is going to McCain, I will vote for Obama, if he is the nominee. Otherwise I'll vote my conscience, Constitution Party.

I'd vote for whatever candidate is most likely to bring the troops home. The USA is screwed no matter what, so regardless of what domestic/economic plans are proposed, the most responsible obligation to the rest of the world is to shut down the empire. If Obama would bring troops home while destroying the USA internally, fine. We're toast anyway and we owe it to the world to end the empire no matter what the cost to ourselves.

Pinguinite.com EcuadorTreasures.ec

Pinguinite  posted on  2008-02-10   18:21:49 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#60. To: robin (#55)

Obama has a grassroots appeal. Soros also backs him. He is something of a maverick, whatever else he is.

Obama was manufactured that Hillary might have some visible and viable competition to make it look good for the sheep.

We have seen much ado from the "republican" candidates, now think what ado have you seen from the democrats other than Hillary/Obama? Not a word, almost as strange as the silence surrounding Paul.

Cynicom  posted on  2008-02-10   18:23:25 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#61. To: Pinguinite (#59)

I'd vote for whatever candidate is most likely to bring the troops home.

Which is the main reason I am thinking of voting for him in Nov, assuming he is there, which is a big assumption.

Hillary will not commit to a timeline for withdrawing the troops and McCain has assured us all that he wants 100 years of wars; probably starting next with Iran.

Ron Paul for President - Join a Ron Paul Meetup group today! The Revolution will not be televised!
I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it.-T Jefferson

robin  posted on  2008-02-10   18:24:38 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#62. To: Cynicom (#60)

He's looking good to win; currently he has more delgates. I'll get back to you after the conventions.

Ron Paul for President - Join a Ron Paul Meetup group today! The Revolution will not be televised!
I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it.-T Jefferson

robin  posted on  2008-02-10   18:25:38 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#63. To: Cynicom, richard9151 (#47)

You need to wrestle with richard then, he has the inside story.

He's got a good number of stories. Some I appreciate and agree with, but the idea that the PTB's can be easily persuaded to let you live in complete freedom just by arguing the right things to the right thugs doesn't quite work for me. Sorry.

Pinguinite.com EcuadorTreasures.ec

Pinguinite  posted on  2008-02-10   18:28:00 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#64. To: Pinguinite (#59)

The USA is screwed no matter what

Ping...

We can agree on that.

Anyone that looks around on their own will find this government/military is not planning well beyond the Iraq thing, they are preparing physically.

Cynicom  posted on  2008-02-10   18:28:09 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#65. To: Cynicom, robin (#10) (Edited)

Recall Perot had "problems" he could never explain to anyones satisfaction?

What I recall, FWIWorth, is that a Bush Sr operative had some porno photos of Perot's daughter that they threatened to release to the compliant and bought media if he kept at his presidential run.

It was never clear to me if the photos were real or fabricated, and I guess it doesn't matter.

If true, it does show how corrupt the Bush's are and that, as George sr. said, "I will do anything to win the race, Anything".

Like over see a presidential assasination?

"Satan / Cheney in "08" Just Foreign Policy Iraqi Death Estimator

tom007  posted on  2008-02-10   18:28:38 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#66. To: robin (#61)

Which is the main reason I am thinking of voting for him in Nov, assuming he is there, which is a big assumption.

I am sending an inspector around first thing tomorrow morning to check your drinking water.

Cynicom  posted on  2008-02-10   18:29:53 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#67. To: robin (#0)

As we said many months ago, if he does NOT run as an independent, he will effectively put 'finis' to great portion of the majority of patriotic passion and commitment of the small, brave patriotic awakening he awakened in this rat hole political paradigm. And if the controllers are as smart as we think, they may well have orchestrated much of the 'Paul phenomena' to ultimately send the message, yet again, that 'resistance is futile!'

Excellent analysis because... it coincides, almost word for word, with my analysis from many moons ago. :)))))

The Ron Paul revolution inside the GOP teapot ended up legitimizing the 2-party system and reinforcing the idea that the 2-party is 'all there is out there', 'rationally and realistically speaking'.

Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'

a vast rightwing conspirator  posted on  2008-02-10   18:30:00 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#68. To: tom007 (#65)

anything, including JFK's assassination

Perot's reasons for quitting were peculiar or he was forced out. Something that might be true of RP, we just don't know. But his last message was very odd.

Sr. Bush didn't want a spoiler for his election chances either, and McCain has called RP a spoiler.

Ron Paul for President - Join a Ron Paul Meetup group today! The Revolution will not be televised!
I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it.-T Jefferson

robin  posted on  2008-02-10   18:30:36 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#69. To: robin (#50)

I would like to hear him say that he is NOT endorsing McCain.

I think it quite silly to suspect that he would endorse McCain, so I don't see why this is important to you. He's just as likely to rip up a copy of the Constitution at a press conference, if you ask me.

Pinguinite.com EcuadorTreasures.ec

Pinguinite  posted on  2008-02-10   18:30:36 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#70. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#67)

The Ron Paul revolution inside the GOP teapot ended up legitimizing the 2-party system and reinforcing the idea that the 2-party is 'all there is out there', 'rationally and realistically speaking'.

So we are on the non-party train with Obama now.

Hey, brilliant analysis and prediction!

Peppa  posted on  2008-02-10   18:31:09 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#71. To: tom007 (#65)

tom

It is spiteful of you to post here since we know where you are.

Just plain mean.

Cynicom  posted on  2008-02-10   18:32:37 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#72. To: Pinguinite (#69)

He just made a big deal about remaining a Republican; no 3rd party race. The usual party practice is to support the party's nominee.

Ron Paul for President - Join a Ron Paul Meetup group today! The Revolution will not be televised!
I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it.-T Jefferson

robin  posted on  2008-02-10   18:32:49 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#73. To: robin (#72)

The usual party practice is to support the party's nominee.

Assuming he has turncoated many times before, this is to be expected.

Peppa  posted on  2008-02-10   18:33:52 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#74. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#67)

I am sure that Dr. Paul himself is very sincere and in no way a part of any conspiracy.

Ron Paul for President - Join a Ron Paul Meetup group today! The Revolution will not be televised!
I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it.-T Jefferson

robin  posted on  2008-02-10   18:34:01 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#75. To: Peppa (#73)

I would never call Dr. Paul a turncoat. Why do you say that? He is the true conservative. Running 3rd party would have been a good choice for him to make, and would have helped defeat McCain.

Ron Paul for President - Join a Ron Paul Meetup group today! The Revolution will not be televised!
I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it.-T Jefferson

robin  posted on  2008-02-10   18:35:35 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#76. To: Cynicom (#71) (Edited)

It is spiteful of you to post here since we know where you are.

Just plain mean.

Well I do have a return ticket in a few weeks.

O But I do have to stop over in the Fiji islands for a week tho.

Tough job, man, somebodys got to do it.

"Satan / Cheney in "08" Just Foreign Policy Iraqi Death Estimator

tom007  posted on  2008-02-10   18:36:10 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#77. To: Pinguinite (#69)

I think it quite silly to suspect that he would endorse McCain,

I was stupid for asking such a question.

These are Pauls words.

" But I am a Republican, and I will remain a Republican."

McCain is a republican and I consider it perfectly unstupid and unsilly to ask a simple question. You took our money, do you endorse McCain.

Cynicom  posted on  2008-02-10   18:36:37 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#78. To: robin (#74)

Of course he is sincere. Getting out of the GOP charade is something that he should have done a long time ago.

Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'

a vast rightwing conspirator  posted on  2008-02-10   18:37:56 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#79. To: Peppa (#73)

Assuming he has turncoated many times before, this is to be expected.

Pep...

There you go again.

Cynicom  posted on  2008-02-10   18:38:00 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#80. To: Cynicom (#77)

Very disappointing, that he will not be running as a 3rd party candidate. He has plenty of money to run and continue to get the true conservative message out in this way.

Ron Paul for President - Join a Ron Paul Meetup group today! The Revolution will not be televised!
I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it.-T Jefferson

robin  posted on  2008-02-10   18:38:24 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#81. To: tom007 (#76)

Tough job, man, somebodys got to do it.

You could be decent and post on some other site?

They say envy is wrong, so I is a wronger.

Cynicom  posted on  2008-02-10   18:39:57 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#82. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#78)

Getting out of the GOP charade is something that he should have done a long time ago.

All of a sudden Paul has gotten political religion. He has seen the light, no more straying.

He did add though, "send money".

Cynicom  posted on  2008-02-10   18:42:14 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#83. To: Peppa (#70)

The Ron Paul revolution inside the GOP teapot ended up legitimizing the 2-party system and reinforcing the idea that the 2-party is 'all there is out there', 'rationally and realistically speaking'.

So we are on the non-party train with Obama now.

Hey, brilliant analysis and prediction!

Voting is only consequential on the margins but, yes. To the extent that McCain is on the GOP ticket, I will joyfully go out and vote for Obama and bring my wife with me and talk as many of my neighbors as I can reach to come and try to help us avoid the McCain plague.

This is coming from a former proud GOP member and Reagan supporter who was fooled once and actually voted for Bush the poppy.

Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'

a vast rightwing conspirator  posted on  2008-02-10   18:42:50 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#84. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#83)

The alternatives are to stick your head in the sand or vote for 100 years of war McCain.

Had RP run as a 3rd party candidate, we could have voted for him. No wonder McCain called RP the spoiler.

Ron Paul for President - Join a Ron Paul Meetup group today! The Revolution will not be televised!
I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it.-T Jefferson

robin  posted on  2008-02-10   18:45:12 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#85. To: Cynicom (#58)

I contact Pauls legislative office and they have a standard put off.."We do not answer emails from non constituents"...

Then I get an email from "Ron" and one from "Carol", please send money so I may save my seat in the house.

I agree that's not consistent, but can we cut the guy some slack? He is/was running for both congress and president and mistakes are made. If you make a mistake dealing with a customer, does that make you a con man?

And richard says they are wealthy beyond our imagination. One of or both of you are wrong.

Who is? Ron Paul?

Maybe that's why he gives some of his salary back to the treasury then, and never voted for a pay raise. Oh wait, if he didn't do that, then that would be proof he's as bad as the rest.

So no matter what, Ron Paul is a wealthy, bought and paid for member of the global conspiracy.

I understand now.

Pinguinite.com EcuadorTreasures.ec

Pinguinite  posted on  2008-02-10   18:46:55 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#86. To: Cynicom (#82)

I don't know how much control RP has over his own delegates but, I hope, he will instruct them to do something visible at the GOP convention - like carry some very graphic and very big anti-war signs and keep them up when the network cameras are looking.

As for him asking for money... I don't live in his district and my idea of political reform would be to restrict all contribution to only those that are to be represented - districts or states and, of course, to enforce one-term term limits. So maybe I will send him a few $$$ while it's still legal to do so.

Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'

a vast rightwing conspirator  posted on  2008-02-10   18:47:58 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#87. To: robin (#61)

Hillary will not commit to a timeline for withdrawing the troops and McCain has assured us all that he wants 100 years of wars; probably starting next with Iran.

McCain would clearly be as bad or worse than Bush. I'd probably rate him worse than even Hillary on foreign entanglements, but Hillary has already gone on record for leaving military action against Iran on the table, ergo....

How bad is Obama on foreign policy? The least of 3 evils, perhaps.

Pinguinite.com EcuadorTreasures.ec

Pinguinite  posted on  2008-02-10   18:50:53 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#88. To: Pinguinite (#85)

richard says Paul is filthy rich. Therefore I am going to ask Paul for my money back. I suspect the odds would be no????

After all I did send a lot of beer money.

Cynicom  posted on  2008-02-10   18:53:25 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#89. To: Cynicom (#79)

Pep...

There you go again.

Right on cue Cyn.

Peppa  posted on  2008-02-10   18:54:45 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#90. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#83)

Voting is only consequential on the margins but, yes. To the extent that McCain is on the GOP ticket, I will joyfully go out and vote for Obama and bring my wife with me and talk as many of my neighbors as I can reach to come and try to help us avoid the McCain plague.

This is coming from a former proud GOP member and Reagan supporter who was fooled once and actually voted for Bush the poppy.

I hang on your every word Vast.

Go forth and save the Republic.

Peppa  posted on  2008-02-10   18:55:40 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#91. To: buckeye (#36)

I really wanted a third party run to give the American people a chance to write in his name. I wanted him to outdo Perot. I figured he had a chance outside the GOP machinery.

yeah, me too. i thought perhaps he had awakened enough people, way more than Perot, that if ever there was a chance for a third party movement, this was it.

The only solution to this mess is to dig a hole big enough to nudge them all in and cover quickly

christine  posted on  2008-02-10   18:55:42 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#92. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#67)

The Ron Paul revolution inside the GOP teapot ended up legitimizing the 2-party system

For those (of us) who already knew otherwise, it did no such thing. For those who didn't, it similarly did no such thing as they are as ignorant now as the were before.

and reinforcing the idea that the 2-party is 'all there is out there', 'rationally and realistically speaking'.

Realistically, it IS all that's out there, however irrational that might be.

Pinguinite.com EcuadorTreasures.ec

Pinguinite  posted on  2008-02-10   18:55:53 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#93. To: Peppa (#89)

Pep...

In spite of your zingers, I do like you a little. And I bet you read the onion thingy about unity. If not, I am crushed.

Cynicom  posted on  2008-02-10   18:56:52 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#94. To: christine, Peppa, robin (#91)

hat if ever there was a chance for a third party movement, this was it.

I guess I let myself be taken in by my own enthusiasm, but I'm apparently not alone. As Pep says, we're waiting for the thunder.

buckeye  posted on  2008-02-10   18:58:43 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#95. To: Pinguinite (#92)

however irrational that might be.

Not stupid but totally irrational.

Cynicom  posted on  2008-02-10   18:58:55 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#96. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#83)

Voting is only consequential on the margins but, yes. To the extent that McCain is on the GOP ticket, I will joyfully go out and vote for Obama and bring my wife with me and talk as many of my neighbors as I can reach to come and try to help us avoid the McCain plague.

with everything you've said about the corrupt two party system, you'd now take part in it and lend legitimacy to it? good grief. i thought you and everyone else here KNEW it's a rigged system. the selection has already been made.

IF NOT RON PAUL. NO ONE. ROCK THE NO VOTE ONCE AGAIN.

The only solution to this mess is to dig a hole big enough to nudge them all in and cover quickly

christine  posted on  2008-02-10   18:59:29 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#97. To: robin (#72) (Edited)

He just made a big deal about remaining a Republican; no 3rd party race.

Okay, but it's probably not possible to run as an independent for prez while running as a R for congress, so that may be why he made the R statement. If he can't run as an R for congress, then he is much more likely to lose the seat. I'd say there's a massive chance that that's his reasoning.

The usual party practice is to support the party's nominee.

Sure, but Ron's not a usual Republican, and certainly does engage in usual R practices!

Pinguinite.com EcuadorTreasures.ec

Pinguinite  posted on  2008-02-10   18:59:36 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#98. To: Pinguinite (#63)

but the idea that the PTB's can be easily persuaded to let you live in complete freedom just by arguing the right things to the right thugs doesn't quite work for me. Sorry.

Oh, no, please do not go there. I have never said nor suggested such. Absolutely not!!!

Why do you suppose I left America? As I have said numerous times, I know what is coming, and I want nothing to do with it.

When a man who is honestly mistaken hears the truth, he will either quit being mistaken or cease to be honest.

richard9151  posted on  2008-02-10   18:59:53 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#99. To: buckeye (#94)

I guess I let myself be taken in by my own enthusiasm, but I'm apparently not alone.

buck...

Without enthusiasm you have nothing..

Cynicom  posted on  2008-02-10   19:00:15 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#100. To: Cynicom (#99)

Without enthusiasm you have nothing..

It's hard not to be enthusiastic. I bought into this whole idea that we were born free.

buckeye  posted on  2008-02-10   19:02:15 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#101. To: christine (#96)

with everything you've said about the corrupt two party system, you'd now take part in it and lend legitimacy to it? good grief. i thought you and everyone else here KNEW it's a rigged system. the selection has already been made.

Good heavens. A two liner, am gonna save this for posterity.

Pin it up on my wall.

Cynicom  posted on  2008-02-10   19:02:19 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#102. To: buckeye (#57)

embedded nullification of the Constitution are very interesting, and yes, very cynical.

Please permit me one small piece of disagreement; the Truth is not cynical.

It is simply, the Truth.

When a man who is honestly mistaken hears the truth, he will either quit being mistaken or cease to be honest.

richard9151  posted on  2008-02-10   19:02:48 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#103. To: buckeye (#100)

It's hard not to be enthusiastic. I bought into this whole idea that we were born free.

You and me both.

It was my last political hurrah. And now this.

Cynicom  posted on  2008-02-10   19:03:34 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#104. To: Pinguinite (#92)

For those (of us) who already knew otherwise, it did no such thing. For those who didn't, it similarly did no such thing as they are as ignorant now as the were before.

Wasting your breath Pinguinite.

They will hear of no such argument.

Realistically, it IS all that's out there, however irrational that might be.

When it is seen that RP was taken down from the inside, it will be interesting to see if trust can be rebuilt for the candidate they want.

More carnage to follow and 3rd party talk will die as well. Part two of maintaining the status quo charade.

Peppa  posted on  2008-02-10   19:04:31 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#105. To: Cynicom (#93)

In spite of your zingers, I do like you a little. And I bet you read the onion thingy about unity. If not, I am crushed.

Thanks for the crumb Cyni. And, you lose the bet. I really don't care about the onion. I'll try not to lose sleep about it.

Peppa  posted on  2008-02-10   19:06:49 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#106. To: Pinguinite (#87) (Edited)

Yes, the least damage, I believe. He actually is against universal health care, but looking for a way to reduce the costs so everyone can afford it. I don't see how he can do it, but more power to him.

He is determined to get us out of Iraq and voted against the war to begin with.

Here is Obama in 2002:

link

I don't oppose all wars. What I am opposed to is a dumb war. What I am opposed to is a rash war. What I am opposed to is the cynical attempt by Richard Perle and Paul Wolfowitz and other armchair, weekend warriors in this administration to shove their own ideological agendas down our throats, irrespective of the costs in lives lost and in hardships borne.

What I am opposed to is the attempt by political hacks like Karl Rove to distract us from a rise in the uninsured, a rise in the poverty rate, a drop in the median income, to distract us from corporate scandals and a stock market that has just gone through the worst month since the Great Depression.

That's what I'm opposed to. A dumb war. A rash war. A war based not on reason but on passion, not on principle but on politics.

On Saddam Hussein

Now let me be clear: I suffer no illusions about Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal man. A ruthless man. A man who butchers his own people to secure his own power.... The world, and the Iraqi people, would be better off without him.

But I also know that Saddam poses no imminent and direct threat to the United States, or to his neighbors...and that in concert with the international community he can be contained until, in the way of all petty dictators, he falls away into the dustbin of history.

I know that even a successful war against Iraq will require a U.S. occupation of undetermined length, at undetermined cost, with undetermined consequences.

I know that an invasion of Iraq without a clear rationale and without strong international support will only fan the flames of the Middle East, and encourage the worst, rather than best, impulses of the Arab world, and strengthen the recruitment arm of al-Qaeda.

I am not opposed to all wars. I'm opposed to dumb wars. So for those of us who seek a more just and secure world for our children, let us send a clear message to the president.

Ron Paul for President - Join a Ron Paul Meetup group today! The Revolution will not be televised!
I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it.-T Jefferson

robin  posted on  2008-02-10   19:07:34 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#107. To: richard9151 (#102)

It is simply, the Truth.

I can't argue with you on many of these issues because I don't know enough about it. And I don't mean to. I do believe some of these interpretations of history have powerful bearing on our problems today. It's no different form looking at the 3/5ths compromise, and stating that failure to resolve the issues it heralded led to the civil war.

The problem is that we're not willing to give up on restoring our freedoms just because we know that the deck is stacked against them.

buckeye  posted on  2008-02-10   19:07:45 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#108. To: christine (#96)

IF NOT RON PAUL. NO ONE. ROCK THE NO VOTE ONCE AGAIN.

Everyone can still write-in Ron Paul. That's probably the best that can be done.

Pinguinite.com EcuadorTreasures.ec

Pinguinite  posted on  2008-02-10   19:07:55 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#109. To: Pinguinite (#108)

Even if it means McCain will be elected in your state?

Ron Paul for President - Join a Ron Paul Meetup group today! The Revolution will not be televised!
I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it.-T Jefferson

robin  posted on  2008-02-10   19:11:36 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#110. To: Cynicom (#8)

If Paul did in fact write it, then he has pulled off the con job of the century in American politics.

We are only 8 years into this century. Get ready...

The Fountain of Truth

snoopdougg  posted on  2008-02-10   19:12:57 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#111. To: richard9151 (#98)

Oh, no, please do not go there. I have never said nor suggested such. Absolutely not!!!

Okay, I respect your denials, but it seems you have advocated freedom solutions that involve citing ancient court cases and such.

Modern police don't care much for such thing when they are firing their tasers and other toys. Judges often don't care much for the rule of law either.

It pretty much works like this: The rules are what the guys with the guns say they are, and they can say different things every day.

Pinguinite.com EcuadorTreasures.ec

Pinguinite  posted on  2008-02-10   19:14:13 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#112. To: snoopdougg (#110)

We are only 8 years into this century. Get ready...

We suffered the Clinton moral humiliation for eight long years, suffered the Bush rape of American liberty for eight years, will we survive another Clinton?

Cynicom  posted on  2008-02-10   19:15:56 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#113. To: Cynicom (#112)

will we survive another Clinton?

no

Ron Paul for President - Join a Ron Paul Meetup group today! The Revolution will not be televised!
I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it.-T Jefferson

robin  posted on  2008-02-10   19:16:49 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#114. To: Cynicom (#112)

will we survive another Clinton?

Hillary's upside is that she will wake America up FAR more than McCain.

The Fountain of Truth

snoopdougg  posted on  2008-02-10   19:17:51 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#115. To: buckeye (#107)

The problem is that we're not willing to give up on restoring our freedoms just because we know that the deck is stacked against them.

That is not the problem, my friend, the problem is when you go about it in the wrong manner. THAT is the problem; when you do it as 'they' dictate instead of in a manner that will succeed. Or could have succeeded, until national politics became a mania.

When a man who is honestly mistaken hears the truth, he will either quit being mistaken or cease to be honest.

richard9151  posted on  2008-02-10   19:19:03 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#116. To: snoopdougg (#114)

Hillary's upside is that she will wake America up FAR more than McCain.

McCain is deranged.

Cynicom  posted on  2008-02-10   19:19:20 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#117. To: richard9151 (#115)

What's the right manner? It sounds like you're saying that all politics are local.

buckeye  posted on  2008-02-10   19:21:09 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#118. To: Pinguinite (#111)

It pretty much works like this: The rules are what the guys with the guns say they are, and they can say different things every day.

Absolutely. They are only following the precepts laid down by such as Stalin, who stated that the difference between Communism and Socialism is that Communism comes out of the barrel of a gun.

As to this;

but it seems you have advocated freedom solutions that involve citing ancient court cases and such.

No. I never go there. Been there, done that, and it is a waste of time. Yes, I have won some minor affairs, but I well understand 'their' system. Again, this is why I left, and have no wish to return; because of the people, who will not accept that was has happened is because of what they have allowed.

I quote court cases to show the basis of what is and has happened; not to encourage using 'their' system to set things to right. I also quote such to show that, contrary to popular belief, there is a reason for things to happen as they do; it is not an accident.

When a man who is honestly mistaken hears the truth, he will either quit being mistaken or cease to be honest.

richard9151  posted on  2008-02-10   19:24:53 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#119. To: snoopdougg (#114)

McCain wants 100 years of wars, I'm guessing Hillary wants like 50. But by then the USA would be no more anyway.

Obama spoke out against invading Iraq. I posted a link and part of his 2002 speech here.

He will bring them home, but not as quickly as RP would have.

Ron Paul for President - Join a Ron Paul Meetup group today! The Revolution will not be televised!
I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it.-T Jefferson

robin  posted on  2008-02-10   19:26:25 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#120. To: buckeye (#117)

What's the right manner? It sounds like you're saying that all politics are local.

No, not all politics are local; BUT.... the only politics where the people count and can have control of the affair is local.

This is why there is always such an emphsis put on national politics, so the people will put their attention where they can have no impact.

There is only one Ron Paul in Congress. Why is that? Because the people who should put more Ron Pauls in Congress have no understanding of what is important, and, how to go about changing things. Instead, they are busy complaining about what is wrong, and, trying to convince others as to how correct their viewpoint is, and, it is not their viewpoint at all; it is propaganda.

When a man who is honestly mistaken hears the truth, he will either quit being mistaken or cease to be honest.

richard9151  posted on  2008-02-10   19:28:57 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#121. To: robin (#17)

IMO, the best we can hope for is Obama.

Have you looked at Obama's positions on gun control?

He wants to ban all semi-automatic weapons (MOST modern weapons), and wants only retired cops to be able to carry guns concealed.

Barack Obama on Gun Control


You appear to be a major trouble maker...and I'm getting really pissed. - GoldiLox, 7/27/2006

FormerLurker  posted on  2008-02-10   19:34:33 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#122. To: richard9151, Cynicom (#120)

This is why there is always such an emphsis put on national politics, so the people will put their attention where they can have no impact.

This is a very insightful post. Thank you for taking time to clarify.

buckeye  posted on  2008-02-10   19:36:08 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#123. To: FormerLurker (#121)

I didn't say he was first choice. What are Hillary's positions on gun control?

Look at your choices. McCain wants 100 years of war.

Hopefully Congress would not give away our guns.

Ron Paul for President - Join a Ron Paul Meetup group today! The Revolution will not be televised!
I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it.-T Jefferson

robin  posted on  2008-02-10   19:37:14 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#124. To: buckeye, Pinguinite (#117)

It sounds like you're saying that all politics are local.

"I believe that if the people of this nation fully understood what Congress has done to them over the last 49 years, they would move on Washington; they would not wait for an election... It adds up to a preconceived plan to destroy the economic and social independence of the United States!"

-- George W. Malone (1890-1961) U.S. Senator (Nevada) 1957

Source: speaking before Congress

In reading the above, you will note that the man DID NOT mention the president; just the Congress. Ever wonder why that would be so, and would you possibly suspect that he knew of what he spoke?

When a man who is honestly mistaken hears the truth, he will either quit being mistaken or cease to be honest.

richard9151  posted on  2008-02-10   19:39:13 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#125. To: robin (#123)

Hopefully Congress would not give away our guns.

The congress of a unanimous HR 1955? The congress of renewed telecom spy powers? The congress of torture? The congress of the MCA and the the abdication of monetary and war power?

We can't afford to bet on this.

buckeye  posted on  2008-02-10   19:40:06 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#126. To: robin (#17)

IMO, the best we can hope for is Obama.

A gun control Marxist who supports infanticide? No thanks.

Vitamin Z  posted on  2008-02-10   19:40:46 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#127. To: christine (#96)

Well, this week's episode of The Big Show has been really exciting, dividing the posters here into about four different warring factions, but what's all this talk of pretending to vote for the negro guy?

Weren't the people paying attention when the writers at the world jew congress, aipac, jinsa, adl and every other anti- America organization announced Hillary! as the next president-elect about six months ago?

That kind of spoiled the show for me. What's the point of pretending to vote when they tell you the outcome beforehand?

Taser International & Diebold -- Goyim control is job #1

Esso  posted on  2008-02-10   19:41:44 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#128. To: Vitamin Z (#126)

OK, do you prefer McCain or Hillary? Those are your only other real alternatives at this point.

Obama is at least against the Iraq war and has been since 2002.

Ron Paul for President - Join a Ron Paul Meetup group today! The Revolution will not be televised!
I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it.-T Jefferson

robin  posted on  2008-02-10   19:42:08 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#129. To: richard9151 (#124)

Ever wonder why that would be so, and would you possibly suspect that he knew of what he spoke?

Tell us more.

buckeye  posted on  2008-02-10   19:44:09 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#130. To: robin (#128)

Obama is at least against the Iraq war and has been since 2002.

But he's for invading Pakistan! (I think Ron Paul is, also -- when it comes down to nabbing Osama).

buckeye  posted on  2008-02-10   19:45:23 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#131. To: robin (#123)

I didn't say he was first choice. What are Hillary's positions on gun control?

I don't think Hillary's positions on gun control are as extreme as Obama's. It's a pretty sad day when Hillary Clinton is looking like the lesser of the evils.

Of course, this entire primary charade was steered and engineered to make that the case.

I'm really disillusioned with RP given his utter refusal to run as a third party candidate. Maybe I'll just write myself in on the ballot...


You appear to be a major trouble maker...and I'm getting really pissed. - GoldiLox, 7/27/2006

FormerLurker  posted on  2008-02-10   19:46:54 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#132. To: buckeye (#130)

But he's for invading Pakistan! (I think Ron Paul is, also -- when it comes down to nabbing Osama).

He's also gung ho on this "war on terror", just like the Republicans, or any other CFR puppet.


You appear to be a major trouble maker...and I'm getting really pissed. - GoldiLox, 7/27/2006

FormerLurker  posted on  2008-02-10   19:48:14 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#133. To: buckeye (#129)

Tell us more.

I have been, since I started in 4um.

I just put up a post; The Doctrine of Reality.

Try it.

When a man who is honestly mistaken hears the truth, he will either quit being mistaken or cease to be honest.

richard9151  posted on  2008-02-10   19:51:23 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#134. To: Vitamin Z (#126)

A gun control Marxist who supports infanticide

He also supports armpit farting and free flack jackets for single moms.

nobody  posted on  2008-02-10   19:51:49 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#135. To: robin (#128)

OK, do you prefer McCain or Hillary? Those are your only other real alternatives at this point.

I almost don't think I could come up with three WORSE choices if I tried!

Vitamin Z  posted on  2008-02-10   19:52:24 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#136. To: Vitamin Z (#135)

McCain is the worst, IMO. If he picks Lieberman as VP, look for McCain to be assassinated if he gets elected.

Ron Paul for President - Join a Ron Paul Meetup group today! The Revolution will not be televised!
I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it.-T Jefferson

robin  posted on  2008-02-10   19:53:56 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#137. To: robin (#136)

McCain is the worst, IMO. If he picks Lieberman as VP, look for McCain to be assassinated if he gets elected.

That's if he doesn't get his fingers onto the football long enough for him to nuke the US first.


You appear to be a major trouble maker...and I'm getting really pissed. - GoldiLox, 7/27/2006

FormerLurker  posted on  2008-02-10   19:57:58 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#138. To: FormerLurker (#137)

Barring that event of course! That will leave US in entirely in the hands of the Knesset.

Ron Paul for President - Join a Ron Paul Meetup group today! The Revolution will not be televised!
I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it.-T Jefferson

robin  posted on  2008-02-10   19:59:41 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#139. To: Vitamin Z, robin (#135)

OK, do you prefer McCain or Hillary?

Some choice, do you want to be hung or shot.

Cynicom  posted on  2008-02-10   19:59:54 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#140. To: Cynicom (#139)

Shot, she probably can't aim well.

Ron Paul for President - Join a Ron Paul Meetup group today! The Revolution will not be televised!
I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it.-T Jefferson

robin  posted on  2008-02-10   20:00:56 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#141. To: robin (#136)

McCain is the worst, IMO. If he picks Lieberman as VP, look for McCain to be assassinated if he gets elected.

Oh my...you're right about that. McCain/Lieberman would probably be the worst ticket ever, although Hillary/Obama or vice versa is right up there.

Vitamin Z  posted on  2008-02-10   20:01:55 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#142. To: Vitamin Z (#141) (Edited)

Odds are Clinton/Obama and McCain/Giuliani.

Regardless of who wins, Tel Aviv wins.

Cynicom  posted on  2008-02-10   20:03:49 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#143. To: robin (#140)

I find it interesting that Hillary has shucked her campaign manager.

Cynicom  posted on  2008-02-10   20:08:30 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#144. To: Cynicom (#143)

I find it interesting that Hillary has shucked her campaign manager.

I find it amazing she didn't do it earlier ... what a schmuck!

Republicans (Democrats for that matter) ....... HAD ENOUGH?

iconoclast  posted on  2008-02-10   20:14:10 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#145. To: Esso (#127)

As I see it Obama has one choice in this years selection. He can either be Hillary's lawn jockey as VP or wait 8 years until it's his turn for the throne. I feel certain the Clinton's have many poison pills scattered about the political landscape and won't hesitate to use them as needed.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2008-02-10   20:14:35 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#146. To: Jethro Tull (#145)

As I see it Obama has one choice in this years selection. He can either be Hillary's lawn jockey as VP or wait 8 years until it's his turn for the throne.

Obama will be used and thrown away.

Cynicom  posted on  2008-02-10   20:17:17 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#147. To: robin (#80)

Very disappointing, that he will not be running as a 3rd party candidate. He has plenty of money to run and continue to get the true conservative message out in this way.

I consider you one of the brighter ones on this forum. However, your statement above does not point that out.

If Ron Paul couldn't get his message out running in the GOP party, was included in all the regular debates, how in the hell would he get his message out as a third party candidate? just stop and think what you're proposing here. Ron Paul does not have hundreds of millions of dollars like Perot has. The MSM would continue to marginalize him running as a third party candidate. The very best a third party candidate can do is spend one heckofa lot of money and at best would be a spoiler.

I hope you also realize that he can not run as a third party candidate after running and losing as a candidate in another party for that same office for the same election cycle. That is to insure the two wings of our one party can stay in power indefinitely. Now, do you finally get a grasp on the election rules?

The 19th amendment has been a curse for America as far as I'm concerned. Women voting gave us dumb ass dumbya. Many women professed they would vote for dumbya as he was 'such a hunk'. Helluva reason to vote for a candidate! Now there are women by the millions clamouring to vote for the hildebeast just because she is a women. Ain't that grand? If she was a truly good candidate, I would vote for her. Unfortunately she is as bad as all the others.

Those who abondoned Ron Paul after he refused to take a stand on whether 9-11 was an inside job are a joke to me They can go drink monkey piss with all the other one issue voters. Had we been able to get him elected, we just might have elected the one man who would have unraveled what actually happened that day. Had he took a stand on that issue as a believer it was an inside job in any of the debates, he probably would already be a statistic of the Jimmy Hoffa type.

The two birds of prey, demons and pubbierats would have had even more fodder to use point him and us(his supporters) and even bigger looney tunes than they have been doing. He showed statesman like classs in his handling of the 9-11 issue. Taking one side or the other would have cost him votes either way. No, he never compromised his principles even once since he started his campaign and that goes to prove what a great statesman he is and points out what a great president he would be.

I believe we will not see the likes of another candidate like Ron Paul ever again. The next time someone comes along that appears to be like him may very well be the anti-christ. Leave it up to the Americans to screw things up and themselves in the process. As someone's tag line says, ' If America is destroyed it just may be from within, by a flag waving,patriotic appering person (s) and that person(s) may very well be all of us.

There isn't 1/10 of 1% of the population that would be willing to put their ass on the line to fight the fight that would restore America back to it's previous greatness. We have been dumbed down for too long, been marginalized too long, spoiled with greed for too long, and now we are going to find out what we really deserve and have coming down the road. I can assure you 'it ain't gonna be a picnic'.Anyone who can't see it coming or can't see the severity of it will, well I feel sorry for them

Ron Paul may well be a distant memory to many former supporters come this november, but he won't to me. I will write in a vote for him as will my wife. Maybe that will help lighten any burden placed upon us when the punishment comes our way. At least we will know like Dr. Paul, we never compromised.

I will not edit this comment. Eye sight too bad and this is pretty long.

LACUMO  posted on  2008-02-10   20:18:17 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#148. To: Jethro Tull, Cynicom (#145)

Indeed, it is difficult, if not impossible, to envision Hillary being denied.

Vitamin Z  posted on  2008-02-10   20:19:06 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#149. To: Cynicom, Vitamin Z all (#146)

Obama will be used and thrown away.

Yep, he's a warm up act for the diversity crowd. He's done well and the rails are greased for a non-white after the CLinton's are done.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2008-02-10   20:25:57 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#150. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#83)

To the extent that McCain is on the GOP ticket, I will joyfully go out and vote for Obama and bring my wife with me and talk as many of my neighbors as I can reach to come and try to help us avoid the McCain plague.

McCain is a lock.

I've been busy but SAP my intention is to stick an Obama sign in beside my ole RP one.

Republicans (Democrats for that matter) ....... HAD ENOUGH?

iconoclast  posted on  2008-02-10   20:33:21 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#151. To: Jethro Tull (#149)

Yep, he's a warm up act for the diversity crowd. He's done well and the rails are greased for a non-white after the CLinton's are done.

...which is why the media are puffing up Obama right now.

Vitamin Z  posted on  2008-02-10   20:34:42 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#152. To: rowdee (#0)

I've not seen him say he's throwing in the towel to do something else...can you point me to that.

ping to the reaction by Jeff Rense

Ron Paul's last message, which has been posted here with the Trotsky quote is pretty much goodbye to the presidential campaign. He states he will be concentrating on his congressional seat.

Ron Paul for President - Join a Ron Paul Meetup group today! The Revolution will not be televised!
I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it.-T Jefferson

robin  posted on  2008-02-10   20:35:40 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#153. To: buckeye (#36)

I really wanted a third party run to give the American people a chance to write in his name. I wanted him to outdo Perot. I figured he had a chance outside the GOP machinery.

He's always said from day one he had no plans to run 3rd party and has given his reasons why (which I agree with). If he can't win the GOP nomination, there's no way he'd win the Presidential election as an independent. All of this is for naught anyway because there's no way a Democrat won't be winning this election. In some respects I think it is a good thing for reasons: 1) The revolution has been sparked. 2) Whoever wins this election is going to inherit the most impossible set of circumstances and will be doomed to failure, taking the brunt of the collapse that was induced by the Bush Administration's poor policies. No one will be able to stop what's inevitably going to happen in the coming years, not even Ron. After their failure, the stage will be set for a RonPaulitician to enter many elected offices so long as the R3volution remains active.

Ncturnal  posted on  2008-02-10   20:40:13 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#154. To: Pinguinite (#108)

Everyone can still write-in Ron Paul. That's probably the best that can be done.

As things stand right now (McCain's a lock) I'll be voting for Obama ... cancel out a bigot.

Republicans (Democrats for that matter) ....... HAD ENOUGH?

iconoclast  posted on  2008-02-10   20:48:08 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#155. To: LACUMO (#147)

I agree with you on all but the woman part for Bush. Gore was a lithsping geek with the stink of Clinton and no mention of Alqueda and all during the first debates. It was all about tax cuts and the economy, building an ownership society and no nation building. This woman, thought he debated better than Gore and had no party affiliation before that.

Then came Kerry, after the 4 year bitchathon, we were all tired of. Kerry said, we should only go to war and die under the flag of the UN. His wife was a flaming nutbar, and let's face it, he could put a rock to sleep.

Bush got selected and elected, withstanding no real competition, or knowledge of the greater game and fraud put upon the public.

Fox News, relatively unknown, was hyped by sites like NewsMax. Without a full on media orgasm where it was politics 24/7, the result, you have to admit, would've been exactly the same.

Our policy makers, may have warmed different chairs at the table, but they would've still been there. IMO.

Otherwise, I think we agree on everything else.

If you need something to throw at me, onions are popular today.

Peppa  posted on  2008-02-10   20:50:22 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#156. To: buckeye (#36)

You're a freakin great American, and I do mean that sincerely and not in the hannity sense of the word.

_______  posted on  2008-02-10   20:50:35 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#157. To: iconoclast (#154)

As things stand right now (McCain's a lock)

How do you figure? The Democrats are outdrawing the Pubbies 2 and 3 to 1 at all primaries. I don't even think they could fix this one in favor of McLame if they wanted to.

Vitamin Z  posted on  2008-02-10   20:52:13 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#158. To: Pinguinite (#44)

We've believed Ron has been a man of conscience all these years, never making backroom deals

Maybe WV was a sign.

_______  posted on  2008-02-10   20:54:17 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#159. To: Vitamin Z (#157) (Edited)

No, no, no.

This is another Clinton being (s)elected.

McInsane might off himself election night when he finally figures it out.

(and that appears to be the only reason I'll be tuning in that night)

_______  posted on  2008-02-10   20:55:12 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#160. To: Pinguinite (#48)

He'll have to live with the same president as the rest of the USA next year, and he certainly isn't leaving anyone in any worse shape than they were in before he declared his candidacy.

You really need to get some correct context here, Cyni!

I'm sure you maxed your $2,200, bought lots of slimjims-yardsigns-banners, chunked in for blimps and vote counts, etc.

Ron Paul lives here and he FILES HERE, right?

Right?

_______  posted on  2008-02-10   20:57:25 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#161. To: Esso (#127)

Weren't the people paying attention when the writers at the world jew congress, aipac, jinsa, adl and every other anti- America organization announced Hillary! as the next president-elect about six months ago?

That kind of spoiled the show for me. What's the point of pretending to vote when they tell you the outcome beforehand?

Gee, I guess that would make you the "world jew congress, aipac, jinsa, adl and every other anti- America organization" dream voter wouldn't it?

Republicans (Democrats for that matter) ....... HAD ENOUGH?

iconoclast  posted on  2008-02-10   20:59:44 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#162. To: buckeye (#49)

Both Obama and his wife are CFR members. He's just younger and appears less power-hungry than Hillary. Remember, globalism is all about hope for humanity. It's not a hateful endeavor. But some of them believe they can do cruel and otherwise evil things to accomplish their aims, because anyone standing in the way is obstructing progress toward utopia. I say they work for the same team, and the team employs the same goon squads regardless of candidate. Once they know they can use one as a puppet, all obstacles are removed one way or another.

I say BINGO.

_______  posted on  2008-02-10   21:01:16 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#163. To: Pinguinite (#54)

Why are some considering this reference to Trotsky as some covert, secret sign that Ron Paul is part of the huge conspiracy instead of just accepting it as some inert reference to something quite plain?

Silly, silly boy.........using the word 'Trotsky' was a secret signal by Ron to the neocons saying essentially 'mission accomplished'. HAven't you heard that he is in on the jewish plot to overtake the world and that by ruining anyone else's chances for a run on a 3rd party ticket--cause everyone was hoping he'd defect from the gop and go the 3rd way--he was to stop anyone that could absolutely win in November.

Sheesh, I thought everyone knew that.........oh way==sorry, you're down in the little "E".

< /sarcasm>

God wants spiritual fruits, not religious nuts!

rowdee  posted on  2008-02-10   21:01:41 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#164. To: robin (#55)

And you think that if Soros tells him to jump that's he'll just tell Soros to go take a flying leap?

God wants spiritual fruits, not religious nuts!

rowdee  posted on  2008-02-10   21:03:20 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#165. To: Ncturnal (#153)

All of this is for naught anyway because there's no way a Democrat won't be winning this election. In some respects I think it is a good thing for reasons: 1) The revolution has been sparked. 2) Whoever wins this election is going to inherit the most impossible set of circumstances and will be doomed to failure, taking the brunt of the collapse that was induced by the Bush Administration's poor policies.

good comments, Ncturnal. welcome!

The only solution to this mess is to dig a hole big enough to nudge them all in and cover quickly

christine  posted on  2008-02-10   21:03:51 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#166. To: _______ (#158)

Maybe WV was a sign.

what's WV?

The only solution to this mess is to dig a hole big enough to nudge them all in and cover quickly

christine  posted on  2008-02-10   21:04:52 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#167. To: _______ (#160)

I'm sorry but whatever your point is, I completely missed it.

Pinguinite.com EcuadorTreasures.ec

Pinguinite  posted on  2008-02-10   21:05:56 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#168. To: Ncturnal (#153)

After their failure, the stage will be set for a RonPaulitician to enter many elected offices so long as the R3volution remains active.

The Paul revolution ended yesterday, in disgrace.

As for the aftermath of Bush...Everything is set in place for our coming total government. The NWO will have arrived.

Cynicom  posted on  2008-02-10   21:08:07 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#169. To: rowdee (#163)

OOOOooooooohhhhh..... thank you rowdee..... Dang I feel sooo stOOOOpid... Shoulda caught that.

Pinguinite.com EcuadorTreasures.ec

Pinguinite  posted on  2008-02-10   21:08:21 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#170. To: christine (#166)

I think that be West "by God" Virginia, as it's sometimes known around the area. ________'s reference to the caucus where RP people made a deal with Huck to vote for him to give him the victory over Romney in exchange for 3 delegates.

Pinguinite.com EcuadorTreasures.ec

Pinguinite  posted on  2008-02-10   21:10:29 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#171. To: christine (#166)

WV is Paul throwing his votes to Huckster in exchange for 3 delegates to beat Romney.

_______  posted on  2008-02-10   21:12:06 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#172. To: Pinguinite (#170)

Yeah.

_______  posted on  2008-02-10   21:12:38 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#173. To: robin (#109)

Even if it means McCain will be elected in your state?

Good point. We wouldn't want to waste our vote on Ron Paul if it would help McCain. That would make a vote for Ron a vote for McCain....

Seriously, I guess it's pretty much a decision for each to make. Is the difference between the D and McCain strong enough to warrant voting for the D, OR is the vote more likely to make a worthwhile impact with the vote counters when cast as a write in for Ron Paul. This assumes the elections aren't rigged, of course, though that consideration would make the write-in the correct choice.

And then you have to figure how much a difference your vote would make when mixed in with the other 100 million.

You know, Ecuador's population of about 13 million means an Ecuadorian vote for prez carries about 25 times more weight than an American's same vote for prez. One of the problems with the USA is that its too damn big.

Pinguinite.com EcuadorTreasures.ec

Pinguinite  posted on  2008-02-10   21:19:11 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#174. To: Vitamin Z (#157)

As things stand right now (McCain's a lock)

How do you figure?

My bad ... I meant a lock for nomination.

I just want a landslide stake in the heart of the Plutocrat Party.

Republicans (Democrats for that matter) ....... HAD ENOUGH?

iconoclast  posted on  2008-02-10   21:23:52 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#175. To: _______ (#171)

Well, he got 3 delegates out of it, which is more than he would have without the deal.

Ron is principled, but also practical. Then again, had the state gone to Romney, maybe there's a chance he'd still be in the race so maybe in hindsight that backfired. Then again, Romney's withdrawal shows us that he probably wanted to avoid a brokered convention and would have acted to prevent it anyway.

So in the end, the result would have been the same.

Pretty screwed up system.

Pinguinite.com EcuadorTreasures.ec

Pinguinite  posted on  2008-02-10   21:24:57 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#176. To: LACUMO (#147)

You did fine, just fine.

God wants spiritual fruits, not religious nuts!

rowdee  posted on  2008-02-10   21:25:46 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#177. To: robin (#152)

And this is being disputed as being from ROn.........for openers.

And as for Rense's take on anything.....bah humbug! He gives the reason for low contributions in January as the result of the truthers being pissed........as I recall, the word was put out for small contributions, i.e., $10.

As though the truthers are the only supporters of RP! Hah. Everyone seems to have an excuse for wanting to bail out from the only guy in a long time who has had a clue as to the problems facing this nation---and offering legit ways to fix them.

Oh well...........at the end of this ordeal, they cal all say, they bailed out, they knew he was a flake, or whatever else they decide between then and now.

God wants spiritual fruits, not religious nuts!

rowdee  posted on  2008-02-10   21:30:03 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#178. To: iconoclast (#174)

My bad ... I meant a lock for nomination.

I just want a landslide stake in the heart of the Plutocrat Party.

Oh, okay, my bad. I concur.

Vitamin Z  posted on  2008-02-10   21:31:13 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#179. To: Ncturnal (#153)

All of this is for naught anyway because there's no way a Democrat won't be winning this election.

My God .... a breath of fresh air.

Republicans (Democrats for that matter) ....... HAD ENOUGH?

iconoclast  posted on  2008-02-10   21:33:46 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#180. To: All (#154)

As things stand right now (McCain's a lock) I'll be voting for Obama

I should have added in the primary as well as in Nov.

Republicans (Democrats for that matter) ....... HAD ENOUGH?

iconoclast  posted on  2008-02-10   21:36:27 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#181. To: LACUMO (#147)

hammerdown  posted on  2008-02-10   21:37:14 ET  (1 image) Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#182. To: _______ (#159)

This is another Clinton being (s)elected.

Not if those that still have the opportunity vote for Obama in their primary.

Republicans (Democrats for that matter) ....... HAD ENOUGH?

iconoclast  posted on  2008-02-10   21:39:35 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#183. To: iconoclast (#182)

BWAHAHAHAHAHA!

You still think that the vote counts aren't manipulated.

How quaint!

_______  posted on  2008-02-10   21:40:27 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#184. To: LACUMO, _______ (#147)

The very best a third party candidate can do is spend one heckofa lot of money and at best would be a spoiler.

nothing ventured, nothing gained. i think the time could very well have been right and i think had RP gone for it, he could have galvanized a very very large number of Americans who would have donated the money he needed. it really was now or never.

then the fact that RP so vehemently declared himself a republican who will remain a republican, for me, added insult to injury.

i agree with _______ who questioned, "How is having a seat in a corrupt Congress as the "Titanic" sinks more important than running a massive message/real effort to win 3rd Party campaign through to November?"

The only solution to this mess is to dig a hole big enough to nudge them all in and cover quickly

christine  posted on  2008-02-10   21:40:52 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#185. To: LACUMO (#147)

Ron Paul may well be a distant memory to many former supporters come this november, but he won't to me. I will write in a vote for him as will my wife. Maybe that will help lighten any burden placed upon us when the punishment comes our way. At least we will know like Dr. Paul, we never compromised.

Bravo! I'll write him in too.

Fred Mertz  posted on  2008-02-10   21:41:27 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#186. To: Pinguinite, FOH, ALL (#173)

One of the problems with the USA is that its too damn big.

And if Juan McAmnesty wins, the USA will be twice as large.

TwentyTwelve  posted on  2008-02-10   21:44:10 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#187. To: christine (#184)

That's a lot of extra time (through to November) to reach people.

Especially in an unfair match, stacked deck such as this. I believe he could win the popular vote and that there would be a 4th Party involved.

All for naught.

Damn

_______  posted on  2008-02-10   21:44:50 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#188. To: TwentyTwelve (#186)

Have you applied for your North American Zone Biometric ID Card yet?

_______  posted on  2008-02-10   21:45:52 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#189. To: TwentyTwelve (#186)

And if Juan McAmnesty wins, the USA will be twice as large.

We gringos could move to Mexico with Jose and Pedro where it is warmer, si?????

Except they would hunt us down like dogs? si?

Cynicom  posted on  2008-02-10   21:46:34 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#190. To: Pinguinite (#170)

________'s reference to the caucus where RP people made a deal with Huck to vote for him to give him the victory over Romney in exchange for 3 delegates.

I heard that when McCain learned he wasn't going to win a majority he his told his delegates to support Huckleberry in order to prevent a Romney win in WV. I heard it on the radio news and it stuck in my mind as fact.

Did I get the wrong version of the news?

Fred Mertz  posted on  2008-02-10   21:48:19 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#191. To: Cynicom (#189)

Gabacho

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

Gabacho (feminine, Gabacha) is a rather derogatory word used in Spanish to describe foreigners of different origins:

  • In the United States it is used mainly by Mexican Americans (and by extension American Hispanics) as a pejorative name for White Americans. It is not widely used or understood by Spanish speakers in the Americas outside the USA and Mexico.

  • In Mexico it refers to US citizens, especially as a pejorative alternative to the milder [[gringo]]. It became widely used in Mexico during the French occupation as a term to refer to the invading French.
  • In Spain, where the word was first used in Spanish, it was used in the first instance to describe people from the skirts of the Pyrenees and then, more generally, when referring to a person from France, which is its main use today. It is also used in Occitan for a rude mountain dweller who speaks the national language badly, being this the origin of the word that, by semantic sliding, was then applied to French people in Spain and to US Anglo-saxon citizens in Mexico or the United States by Mexican Americans.

I believe they call us 'gabachos' now.

_______  posted on  2008-02-10   21:49:04 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#192. To: Fred Mertz (#190)

Paul threw in with him (McInsane) to give Huckster the win over romney.

It was on RonPaul2008.com.

_______  posted on  2008-02-10   21:50:00 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#193. To: Peppa (#90)

I hang on your every word Vast.

Go forth and save the Republic.

:))) Everything that you said on the topic of eLections and Ron Paul's candidacy turned out to be wrong, stupid, irrelevant, naive, loony or a combination of the above so, maybe you should be listening to someone who is almost always right, relevant, informative and insightful because you just might learn a thing or 2.

Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'

a vast rightwing conspirator  posted on  2008-02-10   21:51:28 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#194. To: Cynicom, robin, anyone with a brain (#189)

Ron Paul is suspending his campaign to concentrate on his House seat, eh? Given that incumbents win app. 95% of the time (he has occupied the seat since '88?) *and* considering he won his last election by a 3 to 2 margin, I'd say his 72 year old REPUBLICAN ass is very, very safe.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2008-02-10   21:54:11 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#195. To: Jethro Tull (#194)

AstroGlide

_______  posted on  2008-02-10   21:55:43 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#196. To: _______ (#183)

How quaint!

I guess we occupy the same country ... thank God not the same world.

Republicans (Democrats for that matter) ....... HAD ENOUGH?

iconoclast  posted on  2008-02-10   21:58:15 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#197. To: _______ (#191)

Gabacho

Now I really feel bad.

Cynicom  posted on  2008-02-10   22:00:37 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#198. To: _______ (#195)

KY Jelly please. It makes American political experience so much easier to take.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2008-02-10   22:00:46 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#199. To: Jethro Tull (#194)

considering he won his last election by a 3 to 2 margin, I'd say his 72 year old REPUBLICAN ass is very, very safe.

Jethro...

OK, why did he and Carol hit me up for money?

Cynicom  posted on  2008-02-10   22:01:44 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#200. To: Jethro Tull (#198)

Well, Perot liked it raw, so you know I'm new at this.

Larry Craig (R) I believe endorses AstroGlide, but I'll get both to cover my bases.

_______  posted on  2008-02-10   22:03:02 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#201. To: Cynicom (#197)

Now I really feel bad.

Está bien, usted es apenas un gabacho mudo atascó en la Unión norteamericana.

_______  posted on  2008-02-10   22:04:24 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#202. To: Cynicom (#199)

Because money, greed and politics are all interchangeable. IIRC, he spent $1.5 million for his last House election. With what he has left over from the money bombs he should be good until he's 120 years old.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2008-02-10   22:04:47 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#203. To: Jethro Tull, anyone (#202)

With what he has left over from the money bombs he should be good until he's 120 years old.

what happens to the donated money when candidates drop out of races?

kiki  posted on  2008-02-10   22:13:03 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#204. To: _______ (#192)

Thanks for the info. I wasn't aware that occurred.

Fred Mertz  posted on  2008-02-10   22:16:14 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#205. To: kiki (#203)

what happens to the donated money when candidates drop out of races?

kiki

Recall that olde sock we spoke of??????

Cynicom  posted on  2008-02-10   22:16:46 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#206. To: Cynicom (#205)

Recall that olde sock we spoke of??????

lol!! but I was serious. they don't get to keep it, do they? if so, I'll run for president every four years. I'd be happy with a couple of hundred thousand.

kiki  posted on  2008-02-10   22:19:17 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#207. To: kiki (#203)

It's theirs.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2008-02-10   22:20:37 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#208. To: Cynicom (#207)

It's theirs.

I'm establishing the Old Sock Party first thing in the morning. don't vote for me, I certainly don't want to win.

kiki  posted on  2008-02-10   22:26:09 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#209. To: Fred Mertz (#204)

Ron Paul Secures Three Delegates in West Virginia State Convention (2/5/08)

Press ReleasesRon Paul Secures Three Delegates in West Virginia State Convention

February 5, 2008 4:29 pm EST

Ron Paul Secures Three Delegates in West Virginia State Convention

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

February 5, 2008

ARLINGTON, VIRGINIA – In today’s West Virginia Republican State Convention, Republican candidate Ron Paul’s campaign secured three of the 18 national delegates up for grabs.

“Our goal is to secure as many delegates to the national GOP convention in Minneapolis-St. Paul as possible,” said Ron Paul 2008 campaign manager Lew Moore. “Securing three delegates in West Virginia is an important step in that direction. We plan on locking up more delegates before the day ends.”

In an agreement first reported by West Virginia television station WSAZ, the three Ron Paul delegates were secured through an agreement with the Mike Huckabee campaign.

Ron Paul delegates to the state convention swung their support to Huckabee – putting Huckabee over the top – after Congressman Paul was eliminated in the first round of voting. With three national delegates, Ron Paul secured 17 percent of the 18 delegates that were decided at the State Convention.

_______  posted on  2008-02-10   22:28:03 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#210. To: kiki (#208)

I'm establishing the Old Sock Party first thing in the morning. don't vote for me, I certainly don't want to win.

lol

The only solution to this mess is to dig a hole big enough to nudge them all in and cover quickly

christine  posted on  2008-02-10   22:29:30 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#211. To: kiki (#208)

I took personal offense when Ron and Carol both sent emails pleading for money, for a run for Congress in Texas. Let the cheap Texans buy their own politicians.

Cynicom  posted on  2008-02-10   22:30:01 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#212. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#193)

:))) Everything that you said on the topic of eLections and Ron Paul's candidacy turned out to be wrong, stupid, irrelevant, naive, loony or a combination of the above so, maybe you should be listening to someone who is almost always right, relevant, informative and insightful because you just might learn a thing or 2.

Don't trip on your ego, it's the only thing that makes you half way attractive.

Peppa  posted on  2008-02-10   22:30:06 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#213. To: Jethro Tull, kiki, cynicom (#207)

Candidates' Cash Flow Ahead of Super Tuesday

_______  posted on  2008-02-10   22:31:12 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#214. To: kiki (#208)

Years ago one wag was thinking of running for Mayor of New York City.. He said if he won he would demand a recount.

Cynicom  posted on  2008-02-10   22:32:43 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#215. To: _______ (#213)

this is some bizarre stuff:

McCain finished 2007 in the hole, with $2.9 million on hand (including both primary-season and general-election dollars), but $4.5 million in debt. His campaign scraped by on a line of credit, which was secured largely with McCain's fundraising lists as collateral. That meant that McCain, age 71, had to take out extra life insurance, because the fundraising lists would lose value without him.

kiki  posted on  2008-02-10   22:34:13 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#216. To: Peppa (#212)

Don't trip on your ego, it's the only thing that makes you half way attractive.

Pep...

You take a break and study up on onions????

Or you just come back to heckle, hound and badger me?

Cynicom  posted on  2008-02-10   22:34:49 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#217. To: rowdee (#177)

Everyone seems to have an excuse for wanting to bail out from the only guy in a long time who has had a clue as to the problems facing this nation---and offering legit ways to fix them

It's called scapegoating. Ron Paul won't get elected so the naysayers have to blame someone, and that someone is Ron Paul. Yes it's all his fault. He could have been elected if only he had [fill in the blank here], and because he didn't do that, to hell with him. Who needs Ron Paul anyway?

Pinguinite.com EcuadorTreasures.ec

Pinguinite  posted on  2008-02-10   22:35:15 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#218. To: Cynicom (#214)

He said if he won he would demand a recount.

hehe, sounds like something groucho marx would say

kiki  posted on  2008-02-10   22:35:58 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#219. To: kiki (#215)

McCain finished 2007 in the hole, with $2.9 million on hand (including both primary-season and general-election dollars), but $4.5 million in debt. His campaign scraped by on a line of credit, which was secured largely with McCain's fundraising lists as collateral. That meant that McCain, age 71, had to take out extra life insurance, because the fundraising lists would lose value without him.

Another subprime loan?/s

Peppa  posted on  2008-02-10   22:37:22 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#220. To: Pinguinite (#217)

Who needs Ron Paul anyway?

Ping

Better yet why did he take my money and run???? I took nothing from him.

Cynicom  posted on  2008-02-10   22:37:29 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#221. To: kiki (#215)

Now that's sumthin isn't it?

The chosen CFR loser. I'll bet his book deals and appearance bonuses will get him to the other side.

_______  posted on  2008-02-10   22:37:43 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#222. To: Pinguinite (#217)

I knew his only hope of being elected was to string this out as the inevitability of collapse mounted with each passing day.

He killed that with "I AM A REPUBLICAN CONGRESSMAN" in the Surrender to November goodbye message.

_______  posted on  2008-02-10   22:39:05 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#223. To: Peppa (#219)

Another subprime loan?/s

exactly :)

kiki  posted on  2008-02-10   22:39:23 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#224. To: kiki (#218)

kiki

It was William F. Buckley, Jr.

Cynicom  posted on  2008-02-10   22:40:18 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#225. To: christine (#184)

i agree with _______ who questioned, "How is having a seat in a corrupt Congress as the "Titanic" sinks more important than running a massive message/real effort to win 3rd Party campaign through to November?"

I think if Ron honestly thought that the chances of winning a 3rd party prez run was worth forfeiting his congressional seat, he'd have gone for it. As it is, he sees going indi as a worthless effort, and therefore wants to ensure the consolation prize of keeping his C seat.

Pinguinite.com EcuadorTreasures.ec

Pinguinite  posted on  2008-02-10   22:40:57 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#226. To: Pinguinite (#225)

Whoa! What a year this has been. And what achievements we have had. If I may quote Trotsky of all people, this Revolution is permanent. It will not end at the Republican convention. It will not end in November. It will not end until we have won the great battle on which we have embarked. Not because of me, but because of you. Millions of Americans -- and friends in many other countries -- have dedicated themselves to the principles of liberty: to free enterprise, limited government, sound money, no income tax, and peace. We will not falter so long as there is one restriction on our persons, our property, our civil liberties. How much I owe you. I can never possibly repay your generous donations, hard work, whole-hearted dedication and love of freedom. How blessed I am to be associated with you. Carol, of course, sends her love as well.

Let me tell you my thoughts. With Romney gone, the chances of a brokered convention are nearly zero.

Even Today (2-10-08), A Possible Brokered Convention Exists!

By PrimaryBomb.com | February 10, 2008

But……… unless you’re reading about it here, you probably won’t hear about it.

I’m the evil, “kool-aid” drinking, misleading patriot that has been working since the second week in January of 2008 to get the word out about a possible “brokered convention”.

Yes, even today (2-10-08 at approximately 7:30PM CST) the possibility of a “brokered convention” still exists. Like a flower, each day, each hour, each minute that goes by, it’s life withers away.

Read More »

_______  posted on  2008-02-10   22:43:19 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#227. To: Pinguinite (#225)

I think if Ron honestly thought that the chances of winning a 3rd party prez run was worth forfeiting his congressional seat, he'd have gone for it.

That is not stupid but is convoluted thinking.

Ron Paul and no one here ever had the illusion that Paul would win. No one.

We were hoping for a start, Paul put himself out there, he was not drafted, he asked for and received our money, millions of it and then took a dive.

Cynicom  posted on  2008-02-10   22:44:04 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#228. To: Fred Mertz (#190)

Did I get the wrong version of the news?

I think it is fact that a deal was struck between RP and Huck in WV. I remember seeing mention of it on RP2008.com. Maybe McCain did it also, or did it for free.

BTW, is it for certain that Ron Paul himself made that deal, or might it have been his delegate underlings in WV acting without RP's oversight?

Pinguinite.com EcuadorTreasures.ec

Pinguinite  posted on  2008-02-10   22:45:00 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#229. To: Pinguinite (#225)

If Dr. Ron really thought there was any future left, he'd have planted his flag with the Constitution Party and put some wind into their wings. As it is now, he'll slide back into irrelevance his remaining however many terms and be another one of 435 that only the remnant remember. What a waste.

_______  posted on  2008-02-10   22:45:28 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#230. To: Cynicom (#227)

Ron Paul and no one here ever had the illusion that Paul would win. No one.

We were hoping for a start, Paul put himself out there, he was not drafted, he asked for and received our money, millions of it and then took a dive.

The revolution spark needed more time to flame.

Damn I'm pissed off.

_______  posted on  2008-02-10   22:46:44 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#231. To: _______ (#230)

The revolution spark needed more time to flame.

Good thing General Washington did not take a hike from Valley Forge.

He was made of sterner material and the Brits had a price on his head.

Cynicom  posted on  2008-02-10   22:49:36 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#232. To: Cynicom (#224)

It was William F. Buckley, Jr.

oh!!! I never heard that. it is funny

kiki  posted on  2008-02-10   22:50:49 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#233. To: Cynicom (#220)

Better yet why did he take my money and run???? I took nothing from him.

Ummm.... I think you gave it to him. Or did he have a gun?

Pinguinite.com EcuadorTreasures.ec

Pinguinite  posted on  2008-02-10   22:51:26 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#234. To: Pinguinite (#233)

Ummm.... I think you gave it to him. Or did he have a gun?

Cute...

He was a false prophet and it shows. People better get use to it.

Perot was one, he left us with nothing but he spent mostly his own money.

Cynicom  posted on  2008-02-10   22:54:06 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#235. To: Cynicom, _______ (#231)


My spelling is Wobbly. It's good spelling but it Wobbles,
and the letters get in the wrong places.
-- Winnie the Pooh

farmfriend  posted on  2008-02-10   22:56:32 ET  (1 image) Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#236. To: Cynicom (#234)

On the bright side, I was only hours away from sending a wad down to Ron Paul for Congress and as I set up the screen that "Message from Ron" came in.

Now I'm going to invest it in more useful ways. BLOAT

_______  posted on  2008-02-10   22:57:33 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#237. To: Cynicom (#231)

The revolution spark needed more time to flame.

Good thing General Washington did not take a hike from Valley Forge.

He was made of sterner material and the Brits had a price on his head.

I have a hunch, call it an intuition, that a message made it to Ron at CPAC.

The one that romney got.

Just a hunch.

_______  posted on  2008-02-10   22:58:41 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#238. To: farmfriend (#235)

My kind of park!

_______  posted on  2008-02-10   22:59:09 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#239. To: _______ (#238)

SeadogBytes has some great art work. I was looking up some of his stuff on Pelosi for another forum and came across that.


My spelling is Wobbly. It's good spelling but it Wobbles,
and the letters get in the wrong places.
-- Winnie the Pooh

farmfriend  posted on  2008-02-10   23:02:24 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#240. To: farmfriend (#239)

President’s Day Money Bomb

By scri | February 10, 2008

There is a Money Bomb slated for President’s Day Feb. 18th. Let’s show the WORLD Ron Paul is the PEOPLE’S choice. Thanks, get the word out about Feb.18th.

_______  posted on  2008-02-10   23:03:36 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#241. To: _______, Cynicom (#237)

fwiw, i don't think that Ron Paul will endorse McCain.

The only solution to this mess is to dig a hole big enough to nudge them all in and cover quickly

christine  posted on  2008-02-10   23:04:04 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#242. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#193)

Everything that you said on the topic of eLections and Ron Paul's candidacy turned out to be wrong, stupid, irrelevant, naive, loony or a combination of the above so, maybe you should be listening to someone who is almost always right, relevant, informative and insightful because you just might learn a thing or 2.

Well, ain't you just sumthin special!

God wants spiritual fruits, not religious nuts!

rowdee  posted on  2008-02-10   23:04:16 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#243. To: christine (#241)

All good Republicans are rallying around McInsane.

_______  posted on  2008-02-10   23:05:05 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#244. To: _______ (#237)

Just a hunch.

Elder Lindbergh and Louis McFadden spoke out against the Federal Reserve.

Lindbergh survived assassination attempts, McFadden was gotten on the third attempt.

You have more than a hunch.

Cynicom  posted on  2008-02-10   23:05:49 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#245. To: Cynicom, christene (#244)

But with so many primaries and caucuses now over, we do not now need so big a national campaign staff, and so I am making it leaner and tighter. Of course, I am committed to fighting for our ideas within the Republican party, so there will be no third party run. I do not denigrate third parties -- just the opposite, and I have long worked to remove the ballot-access restrictions on them. But I am a Republican, and I will remain a Republican.

I'm no longer a Republican.

_______  posted on  2008-02-10   23:07:17 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#246. To: Pinguinite (#217)

Right.....

God wants spiritual fruits, not religious nuts!

rowdee  posted on  2008-02-10   23:08:19 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#247. To: christine (#241)

fwiw, i don't think that Ron Paul will endorse McCain.

Most likely you are correct, no formal endorsement but on the flip side, no public comment on McCain whatsoever.

Again a tacit endorsement, once a pub always a pub, I am loyal pub, all BS.

Cynicom  posted on  2008-02-10   23:08:25 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#248. To: _______ (#245)

But I am a Republican, and I will remain a Republican.

I would not be proud of such a statement. Paul should be ashamed. Americans of all stripes rallied to him and his message and do not deserve to be dismissed because Paul gets political religion all of a sudden.

Cynicom  posted on  2008-02-10   23:11:30 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#249. To: Cynicom (#248)

But I am a Republican, and I will remain a Republican.

I would not be proud of such a statement. Paul should be ashamed. Americans of all stripes rallied to him and his message and do not deserve to be dismissed because Paul gets political religion all of a sudden.

I took a pledge to the Queen and to the Queen I am pledged.

_______  posted on  2008-02-10   23:14:42 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#250. To: Cynicom (#247)

RP doesn't have to endorse anyone; he's already locked arms with the biggest load of perverts on the planet. Let him enjoy his exclusive club membership. He's irrelevant.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2008-02-10   23:15:55 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#251. To: Pinguinite (#30)

Suddenly, Ron Paul is garbage.

He's far from garbage. But you have to admit is campaign did not make very good use of donations. Almost like they didn't really want his message to get out.

God is always good!

RickyJ  posted on  2008-02-10   23:17:14 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#252. To: Jethro Tull (#250)

RP doesn't have to endorse anyone;

Jethro...

He already did. Mccain calls for party unity and two days later Paul get political religion swearing his undying faith in the republican party. Makes me sick.

Cynicom  posted on  2008-02-10   23:19:59 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#253. To: christine (#184)

i agree with _______ who questioned, "How is having a seat in a corrupt Congress as the "Titanic" sinks more important than running a massive message/real effort to win 3rd Party campaign through to November?"

It isn't as important as being president.

Boy how easy it is to point a finger of blame. We fickle Americans have been trained to do just that.

Ron Paul started out on a shoe string campaign war chest. It was us supporters who funded his campaign war chest with those two big fundraisers. Shortly after his campaign received those dollars, many on here and other forums started to play politics themselves. Also it was about the same time the concerted MSM started the marginalism of Ron Paul and about the time the seeds of doubt were being planted and beginning to sprout.

In essence, many so called Ron Paul supporters weren't comitted to stand by him through the thick and thin. That is very apparent reading many comments on Freedom4um the last week or so. There is no shame in giving a worthy cause your support. The shame comes when that support is very shallow.

Two women from our Ron Paul meetup group drove over 40 miles one way in blizzard conditions today 2-10-08 to deliver Ron Paul ballot access petitions and Ron Paul delegate petitions that will be driven to Harrisburg PA tomorrow. We are not giving up. You may call us stupid, naive, ignorant, or whatever you want. That my friends is called dedicated and 'real' support. We will also meet tomorrow night at 7:00pm for our regular meeting.The PA primary is still a long way off.

I wouldn't consider voting for any of the candidates running in either party. Like the MSM, I've marginalized the scumbags.We can only expect more of the same and I do believe we just had our last best hope. The trouble is not many Americans today would shed blood for this country and I don't mean just serving in the military.

We've had it too good for too long and have mortgaged our children's, great grandchildren's and great grandchildren's future, finances, liberty,justice,freedom by our own greedy actions. They are left to what appears to be a life of servitude and misery. Let us all take a moment to reach around and give ourselves a great big pat on the back. We wrote the book on meism and the last chapter doesn't even have any words telling them we are sorry.

I do agree that if Dr. Paul wants to run for congress again, he should raise his campaign dollars in texas.

LACUMO  posted on  2008-02-10   23:25:52 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#254. To: Cynicom (#252)

Chuck Hagel vs Ron Paul

March 12, 2007

Chuck Hagel decided not to announce his candidacy for President today while Ron Paul announced. However if you were unfortunate enough to pay any attention to the mainstream media circus you would be under the impression that Hagel was the only candidate to make any news. I think one Ron Paul supporter knows why:

According to Hardball, Hagel is the only Anti-War, Pro-Civil liberties candidate running for the Republican Primary. But, just how Anti-war and Anti-police state is he? Look at his Voting record, compared to the voting record of Ron Paul. He voted for the Military Commissions Act! Ron Paul is the only true Anti-War, Pro-Civil Liberties candidate.

July 5th, 2007

Ron Paul/Chuck Hagel '08 ???

James Pinkerton has written a prospective "retrospective" of the 2008 election in Newsday. It's an interesting piece--especially interesting, I think, in that while it mentions few Republicans by name (other than waving goodbye to John McCain's candidacy), it provides something of an explanation about how Ron Paul could actually win the nomination and ultimately the presidency. An interesting read.

Key quote:

The Republicans, nominating a ticket free of any close association with the outgoing administration, won a comfortable victory.

If only....

How about a Ron Paul/Chuck Hagel ticket? That would fit Pinkerton's bill, wouldn't it?

LLE

Some things I'm thinking of and want to remember.

_______  posted on  2008-02-10   23:26:42 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#255. To: LACUMO (#253)

There is no shame in giving a worthy cause your support. The shame comes when that support is very shallow.

Baloney.

Our support was deeper than his commitment.

Period.

_______  posted on  2008-02-10   23:27:47 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#256. To: Pinguinite (#44)

We've believed Ron has been a man of conscience all these years, never making backroom deals with other congressmen or voting for pork benefiting his own district, and now we're to consider the possibility that someone successfully applied covert pressure on Ron Paul to stop actively campaigning?

Ron Paul is a human like everyone else. He is not immune from the pressure of threats against his family. I would not even blame him for stopping for those reasons. I'm sure he is willing to die for the cause, but he is not willing to see his loved ones die for the cause. Ron Paul is no dummy. He knows what Alex Jones believes about 9/11, yet he still chose to go on his radio program numerous times. Of course Ron knows the truth about 9/11, he also knows that is one boundary the elite won't let him cross without deadly consequences.

Exposing the truth about 9/11 is more important than any presidential run ever. It is the only way America has a chance to change, the only way. The criminals and the people covering up for them must be brought to justice or America will never be free again.

God is always good!

RickyJ  posted on  2008-02-10   23:28:05 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#257. To: RickyJ (#256)

911 was used to move on the North American Zone and the Middle East Zone while getting into bed with the South East Asian Zone, the Euro Zone more deeply and of course send big frns to the African Zone.

_______  posted on  2008-02-10   23:32:09 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#258. To: _______ (#254)

Paul thru mis advice or poor judgment has faltered in the first turn and to a long shot in a race that is fatal. His own presentations were an indicator, allowing lesser men to mock him in front of millions was wrong and someone should have told him so.

I no longer know what to think.

Cynicom  posted on  2008-02-10   23:33:43 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#259. To: robin (#2)

Thanks to JEFF RENSE, if for nothing else, pointing out the ANOMALY of Ron Paul quoting Trotsky, whose demented brain fomented the Russian Revolution of 1917. Ron Paul would normally NEVER quote Trotsky to encourage his followers. The Revolution of Dr. Paul is not a “revolution” which sends millions to the Gulag or deliberately starves farmers in the Ukraine. GET THE PICTURE? Ron Paul is letting us know, in the only way he can, that he has been forced out. He has been threatened, and he has been elbowed out of the race by THUGS. Think-Think-Think-Think! It is so important now that we face this Government Mafia and tell America.

I think that is a distinct possibility. Two weeks ago RP's campaign manager was acknowledging 3rd Party as a distinct possibility

Now it is ruled out completely.

Those are all interesting datums.

I floated the possibility a week ago that there were behind the scenes threats being made - not against Ron Paul as he is personally courageous - but against friends and family - the achilles heel of any good man. It is one thing to risk your own life and another to have known killers state "do 'X' or your daughter gets snuffed".

I also think Jeff was right that RP's comment on 911 eroding support. Since he is reputed to have confided behind the scenes that 911 was an inside job one can only conclude his statement was political or forced. The set-up for the question on it is very interesting - as is Ron Paul's comment after the disavowal. I now believe that may very well have been a statement forced by threats behind the scenes.

I think that the PTB decided it was too risky to whack Ron Paul to take him out of the race and so other means were used. He was forced to shoot himself in the foot and then bow out.

Same thing as happened with the Editor of "Capital Hill Blue" to shut him up. An ex-Marine can't be accused of being a coward so he had to be forced to shoot himself in the foot - on the same issue i.e., 911 Truth.

"The difference between an honorable man and a moral man is that an honorable man regrets a discreditable act even when it has worked and he is in no danger of being caught." ~ H. L. Mencken

Original_Intent  posted on  2008-02-10   23:53:26 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#260. To: Original_Intent (#259)

I floated the possibility a week ago that there were behind the scenes threats being made - not against Ron Paul as he is personally courageous - but against friends and family - the achilles heel of any good man. It is one thing to risk your own life and another to have known killers state "do 'X' or your daughter gets snuffed".

Isn't this what happened to Ross Perot and he was written off as a nut.


My spelling is Wobbly. It's good spelling but it Wobbles,
and the letters get in the wrong places.
-- Winnie the Pooh

farmfriend  posted on  2008-02-10   23:58:43 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#261. To: Original_Intent (#259)

Anybody remember this?

What happened to the recent "That's what I want them to think!TM"?

_______  posted on  2008-02-10   23:59:46 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#262. To: Original_Intent (#259)

I also think Jeff was right that RP's comment on 911 eroding support. Since he is reputed to have confided behind the scenes that 911 was an inside job one can only conclude his statement was political or forced. The set-up for the question on it is very interesting - as is Ron Paul's comment after the disavowal. I now believe that may very well have been a statement forced by threats behind the scenes.

His answer seemed forced and out of character.

Just like his outright killing the National Campaign with "I AM A REPUBLICAN CONGRESSMAN" - Surrender to November.

_______  posted on  2008-02-11   0:01:42 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#263. To: Cynicom (#258)

His own presentations were an indicator, allowing lesser men to mock him in front of millions was wrong and someone should have told him so.

yeah, i agree. and it's not like he didn't have it in him. i saw it and heard it a number of times. maybe he was Perot'd. this was sudden. who knows. i don't know what to think anymore either.

The only solution to this mess is to dig a hole big enough to nudge them all in and cover quickly

christine  posted on  2008-02-11   0:02:21 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#264. To: farmfriend (#260)

Isn't this what happened to Ross Perot and he was written off as a nut.

Which would explain not mentioning it, which I believe Perot did.

_______  posted on  2008-02-11   0:02:43 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#265. To: _______, Christine, Original_Intent (#264)

which I believe Perot did.

Yes he did. He came out and said they had threatened his daughter.


My spelling is Wobbly. It's good spelling but it Wobbles,
and the letters get in the wrong places.
-- Winnie the Pooh

farmfriend  posted on  2008-02-11   0:04:36 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#266. To: farmfriend (#265)

Ron has a very large family complete with great grand child(ren) I believe.

Still, the minute you take on all these guys haven't you already taken these potential threats into consideration.

IMO, Dr. Paul did not expect this to take off. That might be part of it.

We took him higher than he planned on going, in reality?

_______  posted on  2008-02-11   0:06:50 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#267. To: Cynicom (#81)

You could be decent and post on some other site?

Funny.

"Satan / Cheney in "08" Just Foreign Policy Iraqi Death Estimator

tom007  posted on  2008-02-11   0:08:07 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#268. To: Pinguinite (#108)

Everyone can still write-in Ron Paul. That's probably the best that can be done.

I am voting for someone who is actually running. He is not he only one out there that wants to bring America back to following the constitution. So whoever the constitution party nominates is more than likely who I will be voting for to be president of the USA. Third parties can work with enough money, Ross Perot is proof of that.

God is always good!

RickyJ  posted on  2008-02-11   0:10:14 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#269. To: _______ (#266) (Edited)

We took him higher than he planned on going, in reality?

That's probably true. He always did seem taken back by it. Who knew freedom would be so popular.


My spelling is Wobbly. It's good spelling but it Wobbles,
and the letters get in the wrong places.
-- Winnie the Pooh

farmfriend  posted on  2008-02-11   0:11:42 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#270. To: farmfriend (#260)

I floated the possibility a week ago that there were behind the scenes threats being made - not against Ron Paul as he is personally courageous - but against friends and family - the achilles heel of any good man. It is one thing to risk your own life and another to have known killers state "do 'X' or your daughter gets snuffed".

Isn't this what happened to Ross Perot and he was written off as a nut.

Perot was on a trajectory to win without something to make him bow out just as his campaign begin reaching a tidal level.

I am reasonably certain he was forced out and then kookified.

"The difference between an honorable man and a moral man is that an honorable man regrets a discreditable act even when it has worked and he is in no danger of being caught." ~ H. L. Mencken

Original_Intent  posted on  2008-02-11   0:17:40 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#271. To: RickyJ (#268) (Edited)

I'm looking to the Constitution Party nominee as well.

Maybe Baldwin will reconsider now that Dr. Ron cratered the campaign.

_______  posted on  2008-02-11   0:19:04 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#272. To: farmfriend (#269)

After recalling some of his speeches, I think we may be onto something.

_______  posted on  2008-02-11   0:19:38 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#273. To: Pinguinite (#173)

Good point. We wouldn't want to waste our vote on Ron Paul if it would help McCain. That would make a vote for Ron a vote for McCain....

McCain or Hillary or even Obama, there are no significant differences between them. They are all all bought and paid for stooges. Vote for the person you consider the best. If that's Ron Paul in your mind, then vote for him. I will be voting for the constitution party candidate.

God is always good!

RickyJ  posted on  2008-02-11   0:24:14 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#274. To: Original_Intent, _______ (#270)

I am reasonably certain he was forced out and then kookified.

I agree.

_______: I'm looking to the Constitution Party nominee as well.

That's the party I'm switching to and they will get my vote from now on.


My spelling is Wobbly. It's good spelling but it Wobbles,
and the letters get in the wrong places.
-- Winnie the Pooh

farmfriend  posted on  2008-02-11   0:25:12 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#275. To: RickyJ, Original_Intent, _______, Pinguinite (#273)

I will be voting for the constitution party candidate.

I know they had a woman running in the Primary. I don't know if she will get the nomination or not. Everyone at the central committee meeting seemed to be supporting her.


My spelling is Wobbly. It's good spelling but it Wobbles,
and the letters get in the wrong places.
-- Winnie the Pooh

farmfriend  posted on  2008-02-11   0:28:20 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#276. To: RickyJ (#273)

McHillahuckabama was 100% CFR sponsored and certified.

_______  posted on  2008-02-11   0:31:41 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#277. To: farmfriend (#274) (Edited)

I'm re-registering from R to CP tomorrow.

I registered from Independent to Republican (I was a Republican during most of the 80s, registered I during the Bush-Clinton-Bush years to recently) and never had a problem as a GOP delegate all these years.

The Party left me, but there's a Party worthy of my support, but NOT guaranteed my vote.

The best man for America gets my VOTE.

_______  posted on  2008-02-11   0:34:12 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#278. To: buckeye, TwentyTwelve, FOH (#276)

McHillahuckabama was 100% CFR sponsored and certified.

Ya think?

_______  posted on  2008-02-11   0:35:37 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#279. To: robin, Original_Intent, TwentyTwelve, FormerLurker, christine, noone222, Ferret Mike, richard9151, ALL (#0)

I didn't read the article, just the title. Ask me why if you really want to know.

I suspect that maybe Ron Paul was threatened.

Then I also have other ideas, but some things are better left unsaid.

Personally I'm disappointed, but not surprised.

The idea's unstoppable - the human spirit indomitable (sp?) and the collective mind will prevail.

Now I'm gonna go look for a youtube video...


“The individual is handicapped by coming face-to-face with a conspiracy so monstrous he cannot believe it exists.” ~ J. Edgar Hoover

wudidiz  posted on  2008-02-11   0:41:04 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#280. To: farmfriend, _______ (#274)

I am reasonably certain he was forced out and then kookified.

I agree.

_______: I'm looking to the Constitution Party nominee as well.

That's the party I'm switching to and they will get my vote from now on.

I thought at the time that there might be pressure on Perot to bow out. How does a mere Billionaire fight against Trillionaires?

For now I am keeping my Libertarian registration, but I will vote Constitution Party if they field a good candidate.

"The difference between an honorable man and a moral man is that an honorable man regrets a discreditable act even when it has worked and he is in no danger of being caught." ~ H. L. Mencken

Original_Intent  posted on  2008-02-11   0:44:14 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#281. To: Original_Intent (#280)

If no one is worthy, I'll write in Original_Intent.

Only if you promise to put in _______.

_______  posted on  2008-02-11   0:47:42 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#282. To: farmfriend (#275)

I will be voting for the constitution party candidate.

I know they had a woman running in the Primary. I don't know if she will get the nomination or not. Everyone at the central committee meeting seemed to be supporting her.

That would be something I could get behind. (Stop groaning.)

Seriously, a gutsy REAL Woman squaring off against the wannabe Dyketator Hitlery would not only be entertaining it would neutralize the idiots who are voting for Hitlery solely because "Iwannawoman". Of course it might hurt their heads because it force them to actually look at the issues.

"The difference between an honorable man and a moral man is that an honorable man regrets a discreditable act even when it has worked and he is in no danger of being caught." ~ H. L. Mencken

Original_Intent  posted on  2008-02-11   0:49:30 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#283. To: Original_Intent, farmfriend (#282)

Who is this tigress?

_______  posted on  2008-02-11   0:51:36 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#284. To: _______ (#281)

If no one is worthy, I'll write in Original_Intent.

Only if you promise to put in _______.

It could work.

"The difference between an honorable man and a moral man is that an honorable man regrets a discreditable act even when it has worked and he is in no danger of being caught." ~ H. L. Mencken

Original_Intent  posted on  2008-02-11   0:53:09 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#285. To: Original_Intent (#284)

You should know I had a major policy change, a huge flip, before you consider writing me in

_______  posted on  2008-02-11   0:55:02 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#286. To: _______ (#283)

Who is this tigress?

Jill St. John (IQ 190 - D Cup)?

"The difference between an honorable man and a moral man is that an honorable man regrets a discreditable act even when it has worked and he is in no danger of being caught." ~ H. L. Mencken

Original_Intent  posted on  2008-02-11   0:55:10 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#287. To: Original_Intent (#286)

FOFLOL

_______  posted on  2008-02-11   0:55:36 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#288. To: _______ (#277)

I registered from Independent to Republican (I was a Republican during most of the 80s, registered I during the Bush-Clinton-Bush years to recently) and never had a problem as a GOP delegate all these years.

I have always been a Republican. American Independent Party is the CA version of the Constitution Party.


My spelling is Wobbly. It's good spelling but it Wobbles,
and the letters get in the wrong places.
-- Winnie the Pooh

farmfriend  posted on  2008-02-11   1:02:06 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#289. To: farmfriend (#288)

I figure my 3rd Party has to be a charm! ~rimshot~

_______  posted on  2008-02-11   1:03:09 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#290. To: Original_Intent (#280)

For now I am keeping my Libertarian registration,

Well they fit my beliefs better but the AIP is the third largest party in CA and I think I can work with them.


My spelling is Wobbly. It's good spelling but it Wobbles,
and the letters get in the wrong places.
-- Winnie the Pooh

farmfriend  posted on  2008-02-11   1:04:18 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#291. To: Original_Intent (#282)

That would be something I could get behind. (Stop groaning.)

Wasn't groaning just snickering a little.


My spelling is Wobbly. It's good spelling but it Wobbles,
and the letters get in the wrong places.
-- Winnie the Pooh

farmfriend  posted on  2008-02-11   1:06:10 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#292. To: farmfriend (#290)

For now I am keeping my Libertarian registration,

Well they fit my beliefs better but the AIP is the third largest party in CA and I think I can work with them.

Got it. They're not bad people. I don't agree with all of the economic policies, but I have given up on achieving or expecting "ideologic purity".

"The difference between an honorable man and a moral man is that an honorable man regrets a discreditable act even when it has worked and he is in no danger of being caught." ~ H. L. Mencken

Original_Intent  posted on  2008-02-11   1:10:01 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#293. To: farmfriend (#291)

That would be something I could get behind. (Stop groaning.)

Wasn't groaning just snickering a little.

I been a baaaaaaaad boy. Hee, hee.

"The difference between an honorable man and a moral man is that an honorable man regrets a discreditable act even when it has worked and he is in no danger of being caught." ~ H. L. Mencken

Original_Intent  posted on  2008-02-11   1:11:53 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#294. To: _______ (#283)

Who is this tigress?

I'll have to look it up.


My spelling is Wobbly. It's good spelling but it Wobbles,
and the letters get in the wrong places.
-- Winnie the Pooh

farmfriend  posted on  2008-02-11   1:14:02 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#295. To: farmfriend (#294)

I'll need a picture of her too, thanks! har

_______  posted on  2008-02-11   1:16:08 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#296. To: RickyJ (#256)

Ron Paul is a human like everyone else. He is not immune from the pressure of threats against his family. I would not even blame him for stopping for those reasons.

Sure, but there were no threats needed. All that was needed is for Ron Paul to continue not getting delegates. Any PTB's would not need to go to the levels you suggest. Why would they, and risk exposure unnecessarily.

Pinguinite.com EcuadorTreasures.ec

Pinguinite  posted on  2008-02-11   1:17:07 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#297. To: _______ (#295)

I'll need a picture of her too, thanks!

Don't get me started. I promise you'll regret it.


My spelling is Wobbly. It's good spelling but it Wobbles,
and the letters get in the wrong places.
-- Winnie the Pooh

farmfriend  posted on  2008-02-11   1:36:44 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#298. To: wudidiz (#279)

I suspect that maybe Ron Paul was threatened.

If that were the case, he would retire from politics completely, just to be safe.

I mean, who in their right mind would yield to threats about running for prez and still run for congress?

Pinguinite.com EcuadorTreasures.ec

Pinguinite  posted on  2008-02-11   1:37:37 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#299. To: _______, Original_Intent (#295)

Diane Templin

http://www.aipca.org/


My spelling is Wobbly. It's good spelling but it Wobbles,
and the letters get in the wrong places.
-- Winnie the Pooh

farmfriend  posted on  2008-02-11   1:41:15 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#300. To: Pinguinite (#298)

I mean, who in their right mind would yield to threats about running for prez and still run for congress?

He was telling the truth on the floor of Congress and via his legislation for decades and they didn't care. Even let him win his District over and again.

Ron Paul is DANGEROUS on the national stage.

_______  posted on  2008-02-11   1:42:28 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#301. To: farmfriend (#299)

That photo must be 30 years old.

Thanks.

_______  posted on  2008-02-11   1:43:06 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#302. To: Original_Intent (#293)

I been a baaaaaaaad boy. Hee, hee.

Now why doesn't that surprise me?


My spelling is Wobbly. It's good spelling but it Wobbles,
and the letters get in the wrong places.
-- Winnie the Pooh

farmfriend  posted on  2008-02-11   1:44:44 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#303. To: Cynicom (#34)

Ron Paul was the last life raft leaving the Titanic and he shoved off saving himself. That is you and me standing at the rail, with nothing.

You're correct Cyni. Again, we are left with the Final Option. I've already stated this along with quotes from Thomas Jefferson and Patrick Henry. The time for politics is over. Amerika is on a ventilator....there is NO more time to act within the System.

Law Enforcement Against Prohibition

"There is no 'legitimate' Corporation by virtue of it's very legal definition and purpose."
-- IndieTx

"Corporation: An entity created for the legal protection of its human parasites, whose sole purpose is profit and self-perpetuation." © IndieTx

IndieTX  posted on  2008-02-11   1:45:34 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#304. To: Original_Intent (#292)

but I have given up on achieving or expecting "ideologic purity".

Exactly.


My spelling is Wobbly. It's good spelling but it Wobbles,
and the letters get in the wrong places.
-- Winnie the Pooh

farmfriend  posted on  2008-02-11   1:46:28 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#305. To: farmfriend (#299)

Ignoring the smile and focusing on the eyes - she looks like a very calculating woman.

"The difference between an honorable man and a moral man is that an honorable man regrets a discreditable act even when it has worked and he is in no danger of being caught." ~ H. L. Mencken

Original_Intent  posted on  2008-02-11   1:56:09 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#306. To: Pinguinite (#298)

who in their right mind would yield to threats about running for prez and still run for congress?

Someone that was instructed to quit running for prez and run for congress, or else? I dunno, why else would he go so far and then just quit? Sorry, I didn't read the whole thread here. Just that, something's fishy here...


“The individual is handicapped by coming face-to-face with a conspiracy so monstrous he cannot believe it exists.” ~ J. Edgar Hoover

wudidiz  posted on  2008-02-11   2:03:05 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#307. To: Original_Intent (#305)

she looks like a very calculating woman.

It's still a man's world. Women only control...well...


My spelling is Wobbly. It's good spelling but it Wobbles,
and the letters get in the wrong places.
-- Winnie the Pooh

farmfriend  posted on  2008-02-11   2:03:06 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#308. To: christine, Peppa, rowdee (#263)

ya know, I've read about enough of this bullshit. what a freakin' joke. when has anyone ever done anything worth a shit on a "Third Party" ticket? answer - never. and as for this goddamn Perot genuflecting, give me a fkn' break. he'd be as irrelavant as Nader if he hadn't been spookdaddy's little bitch. wobbly petitioned the CPD to bend the rules and let him into the debates, and that's the only reason he pulled the percentage of votes that he did. right, like the two chosen frauds are going to ask to bend the 15% rule to let Ron anywhere near the final debates if he would go third party. or maybe David Icke's mystical millionaires would beam down all that cash they're sitting on just waiting for him to make his move. pffftttt! oh, wait. I forgot that he is one of "THEM", ya' know. pmlol!

"It's a little bit early to write us off, but I'm not making any predictions that we're going to run away with it, either," he said. "We're going to be continuing the process to remind Republicans what the conservative philosophy is all about."

Paul's spokesman Jesse Benton said the national staff would likely be reduced from 150 to about 50, with those who worked in the Super Tuesday primaries in states such as California being let go.

In addition, Benton said, he and other national staffers will transfer to Paul's congressional re-election operation.

But Benton said that even as Paul wages a primary campaign he will also continue running his presidential campaign in Texas. Three staffers will be assigned to his presidential effort here. He said that the Paul campaign has purchased about $700,000 worth of radio and cable television advertising that is scheduled to start running this week in the Houston, Austin and Dallas-Fort Worth markets.

Benton said that Paul still has about $6 million in his presidential election account. He said the lawmaker cannot transfer that money to his congressional campaign unless he terminates his presidential effort, which he does not intend to do.

But Benton said Paul had recently raised several hundred thousand dollars for his congressional race.

Ron has said repeatedly that he is an "Old Right Republican", like Taft and Goldwater, over the last twelve years that I've been aware of his efforts to do something about the monstrosity that is the federal government. and he has said from the beginning that he was running a dual campaign including his house seat. if people want to read between the lines and fabricate fantasies to their liking, that's their fk'n problem, but he has never misrepresented himself as anything but that. if that ain't good enough, then guess it's just tough shit. cry me a fk'n river.

with Romney 'suspending' his campaign, that screws up the brokered convention strategy because it locks up his delegates, including the ones he just got in Maine and any others he collects because Neds are still supporting him, and different rules apply as to what can be done with them than if he would've dropped out. I'm not really pleased with how Rons run has panned out up till now either, but where the fuck do these people get off with throwing him in front of the train. enjoy the sunshine...

hammerdown  posted on  2008-02-11   2:06:11 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#309. To: Original_Intent, farmfriend (#305)

Ignoring the smile and focusing on the eyes - she looks like a very calculating woman.

I think she's hot.

Which is a dead giveaway - she's probably evil incarnate.


“The individual is handicapped by coming face-to-face with a conspiracy so monstrous he cannot believe it exists.” ~ J. Edgar Hoover

wudidiz  posted on  2008-02-11   2:06:35 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#310. To: wudidiz (#306)

Sorry, I didn't read the whole thread here. Just that, something's fishy here...

You are on agreement with a few of us who believe he was Perot'd.


My spelling is Wobbly. It's good spelling but it Wobbles,
and the letters get in the wrong places.
-- Winnie the Pooh

farmfriend  posted on  2008-02-11   2:07:24 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#311. To: farmfriend (#310)

You are on agreement with a few of us...

Nice.

I'm so tired of fighting all the time.

Btw, I certainly don't miss yukon.


“The individual is handicapped by coming face-to-face with a conspiracy so monstrous he cannot believe it exists.” ~ J. Edgar Hoover

wudidiz  posted on  2008-02-11   2:09:32 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#312. To: farmfriend (#307)

she looks like a very calculating woman.

It's still a man's world. Women only control...well...

Well it was not an attack against sharp women. Devvy Kidd is very sharp and shrewd but I would not call her calculating. Tough? Yes. Calculating? No.

I have no problem with tough sharp women - I don't like shrinking violets - I like tough women and always have. However, the term calculating, for me, connotes sharpness with a shortage of compassion.

"The difference between an honorable man and a moral man is that an honorable man regrets a discreditable act even when it has worked and he is in no danger of being caught." ~ H. L. Mencken

Original_Intent  posted on  2008-02-11   2:10:33 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#313. To: ALL (#312)

It's my birthday and I didn't even get lucky...

Well that's not entirely true.

I'ts not my birthday.


“The individual is handicapped by coming face-to-face with a conspiracy so monstrous he cannot believe it exists.” ~ J. Edgar Hoover

wudidiz  posted on  2008-02-11   2:12:30 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#314. To: Original_Intent (#259)

_______  posted on  2008-02-11   2:15:40 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#315. To: Original_Intent (#312)

Devvy Kidd is very sharp and shrewd but I would not call her calculating.

I've got that name written on my meeting notes but nothing with it. I was thinking that was the one running but found the other name on the web site. What have I forgotten?


My spelling is Wobbly. It's good spelling but it Wobbles,
and the letters get in the wrong places.
-- Winnie the Pooh

farmfriend  posted on  2008-02-11   2:16:10 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#316. To: wudidiz, farmfriend (#313)

LOL!

Well, I hate to be a kill joy but I am about to fall asleep in my chair so I am outta here.

Take Care, and just remember what Robert Heinlein said (via Lazarus Long):

"Things always look their darkest just before it turns pitch black."

"The difference between an honorable man and a moral man is that an honorable man regrets a discreditable act even when it has worked and he is in no danger of being caught." ~ H. L. Mencken

Original_Intent  posted on  2008-02-11   2:17:46 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#317. To: wudidiz (#306)

LOL

Exactly.

_______  posted on  2008-02-11   2:18:52 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#318. To: wudidiz (#311)

Btw, I certainly don't miss yukon.

He pops in here once in a while. He didn't get banned did he? I was exchanging "kiss my ass" pictures with him the other day.


My spelling is Wobbly. It's good spelling but it Wobbles,
and the letters get in the wrong places.
-- Winnie the Pooh

farmfriend  posted on  2008-02-11   2:19:06 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#319. To: Pinguinite (#296)

Any PTB's would not need to go to the levels you suggest. Why would they, and risk exposure unnecessarily.

His message was indeed getting out to many people. There was documented evidence of vote fraud in many states. They had to do something to get him out before more people became supporters. At a certain point vote fraud doesn't work any more. When a majority vote for a candidate and that candidate loses the chances for a revolt increase. The PTB did not want to risk a revolt and surely couldn't accept him winning.

God is always good!

RickyJ  posted on  2008-02-11   2:19:20 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#320. To: wudidiz (#309)

ROFL!

_______  posted on  2008-02-11   2:19:53 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#321. To: Pinguinite (#306)

...who in their right mind would yield to threats about running for prez and still run for congress?

Someone that was instructed to quit running for prez and run for congress, or else?

Sorry, I mean that with all due respect, I was only trying to answer the question.


“The individual is handicapped by coming face-to-face with a conspiracy so monstrous he cannot believe it exists.” ~ J. Edgar Hoover

wudidiz  posted on  2008-02-11   2:21:29 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#322. To: RickyJ (#319)

I wonder if Ron will ever tell the 'whole truth'.

_______  posted on  2008-02-11   2:22:22 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#323. To: Original_Intent (#316)

"Things always look their darkest just before it turns pitch black."

LOL

Oh, isn't that encouraging.


“The individual is handicapped by coming face-to-face with a conspiracy so monstrous he cannot believe it exists.” ~ J. Edgar Hoover

wudidiz  posted on  2008-02-11   2:23:41 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#324. To: Original_Intent, wudidiz (#316)

"Things always look their darkest just before it turns pitch black."

The light at the end of the tunnel could be an oncoming train.


My spelling is Wobbly. It's good spelling but it Wobbles,
and the letters get in the wrong places.
-- Winnie the Pooh

farmfriend  posted on  2008-02-11   2:24:38 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#325. To: farmfriend (#318) (Edited)

I was exchanging "kiss my ass" pictures with him the other day.

Isn't that sweet. What a f***ing asshole that guy is.


“The individual is handicapped by coming face-to-face with a conspiracy so monstrous he cannot believe it exists.” ~ J. Edgar Hoover

wudidiz  posted on  2008-02-11   2:24:55 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#326. To: _______ (#322)

On 2008-02-11 02:22:22, _______ wrote:

To: RickyJ

I wonder if Ron will ever tell the 'whole truth'.

That's alot o' 2's, eh?

Coincidence?


“The individual is handicapped by coming face-to-face with a conspiracy so monstrous he cannot believe it exists.” ~ J. Edgar Hoover

wudidiz  posted on  2008-02-11   2:27:34 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#327. To: wudidiz (#325)

What a f***ing asshole that guy is.

LOL! There is more than one on this site even if you don't count can of balls or whatever his name was.


My spelling is Wobbly. It's good spelling but it Wobbles,
and the letters get in the wrong places.
-- Winnie the Pooh

farmfriend  posted on  2008-02-11   2:28:11 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#328. To: robin (#55)

Obama has a grassroots appeal. Soros also backs him. He is something of a maverick, whatever else he is.

He's a product of the most corrupt machine in the country-Cook County, Ill.

Honest candidates don't come from Cook County. They all know how the game is played and they all pass and receive little brown bags of dirty money....

"'Schools is educationy' ; A message from our president."

HOUNDDAWG  posted on  2008-02-11   2:28:33 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#329. To: Peppa, robin (#38)

Jimmy Carter type of Democrat. Others have said so too.

I'll get my Obama sticker right now!

Yeah, give away the Panama Canal type of Democrat.

"'Schools is educationy' ; A message from our president."

HOUNDDAWG  posted on  2008-02-11   2:30:02 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#330. To: wudidiz (#306)

Someone that was instructed to quit running for prez and run for congress, or else?

I just cannot imagine anyone trusting the word of someone who just threatened their family. I think the average person would take a pass on the order to run for congress and either disappear or deliberately sabotage his one congressional campaign to get as far away from the threat as possible. If you've been threadened, than doing otherwise is playing with fire.

No, threats don't add up here.

something's fishy here...

Disappointment could smell like that.

Pinguinite.com EcuadorTreasures.ec

Pinguinite  posted on  2008-02-11   2:30:39 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#331. To: wudidiz (#326)

I don't know, eh?

LOL

_______  posted on  2008-02-11   2:31:02 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#332. To: wudidiz (#326)

2008-02-11 2:22:22 ET

Powerball clue?

_______  posted on  2008-02-11   2:31:56 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#333. To: hammerdown (#308)

I'm with you, Hammer.

Pinguinite.com EcuadorTreasures.ec

Pinguinite  posted on  2008-02-11   2:33:17 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#334. To: wudidiz (#321)

Sorry, I mean that with all due respect, I was only trying to answer the question.

NP. I understood your context.

Pinguinite.com EcuadorTreasures.ec

Pinguinite  posted on  2008-02-11   2:35:05 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#335. To: _______, wudidiz (#332)

Well sweetie pies I have to be up again in about 4 hours so I'm going to try and get some sleep. Nite!


My spelling is Wobbly. It's good spelling but it Wobbles,
and the letters get in the wrong places.
-- Winnie the Pooh

farmfriend  posted on  2008-02-11   2:43:47 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#336. To: Pinguinite (#330)

No, threats don't add up here.

(something's fishy here...)

Disappointment could smell like that.

Yes, good points, thank you. It's just that why would someone with such good ideas as Ron Paul had just up and quit before it was all over?

I mean I'd be less disappointed if he'd lost, but to just quit?

Doesn't make sense to me. Mind you, I'm not very knowledgeable about the ways of politics and again forgive me, but I didn't read the whole thread.


“The individual is handicapped by coming face-to-face with a conspiracy so monstrous he cannot believe it exists.” ~ J. Edgar Hoover

wudidiz  posted on  2008-02-11   2:43:52 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#337. To: farmfriend (#335)

Adios as is custom in the NAU!

_______  posted on  2008-02-11   2:44:34 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#338. To: _______ (#332)

2008-02-11 2:22:22 ET

Powerball clue?

LOL

what?


“The individual is handicapped by coming face-to-face with a conspiracy so monstrous he cannot believe it exists.” ~ J. Edgar Hoover

wudidiz  posted on  2008-02-11   2:45:04 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#339. To: wudidiz (#338)

Just joking about the lottery. Or maybe it's some other clue!

Just pinged you elsewhere.

_______  posted on  2008-02-11   2:46:27 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#340. To: farmfriend (#335)

Nite!

Have good dreams and know that I'll be givin' that yukon a piece of my mind next time I come across him.


“The individual is handicapped by coming face-to-face with a conspiracy so monstrous he cannot believe it exists.” ~ J. Edgar Hoover

wudidiz  posted on  2008-02-11   2:46:59 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#341. To: wudidiz, christine (#336)

Yes, good points, thank you. It's just that why would someone with such good ideas as Ron Paul had just up and quit before it was all over?

Ron has a practical streak in him. If Romney hadn't quit then I think Ron would still be focusing on the prez race. With Romney out, RP just sees that it's very unlikely further efforts bearing fruit, since all hinged on the hope of a brokered convention. In fact it seems Romney didn't want any disunity in the R party and quit early specifically to prevent a brokered convention. If any thing is fishy around here it's Romneys "suspension" of his campaign as he basically undermined Ron's strategy by withdrawing.

But being as pragmatic as he (Ron) is, he's changing focus to the house campaign.

It's really the same line of reasoning that he's had for not going indi. He sees no hope of winning as an independent so he won't try. It's also likely that if he ran indi for prez he'd have to run indi as well for his TX congress seat. I'd guess that a factor.

I mean I'd be less disappointed if he'd lost, but to just quit?

He's not quit the prez race exactly. He's still in it and he cannot use his prez funds for his congress seat, so those funds will continue to be used at the prez level.

Doesn't make sense to me. Mind you, I'm not very knowledgeable about the ways of politics and again forgive me, but I didn't read the whole thread.

This thread is a great thread, actually. I was thinking to myself this evening that unlike LP, this thread is full of real discussion between people who strongly disagree, and there's yet to be any mudslinging as happens all the time elsewhere. There's disappointment and such, but we're pretty much all civilized people on this thread. It's really a great promo thread for 4um.

Pinguinite.com EcuadorTreasures.ec

Pinguinite  posted on  2008-02-11   3:01:20 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#342. To: wudidiz (#340)

and know that I'll be givin' that yukon a piece of my mind next time I come across him. TIA.

Could you give him a piece of mine, too? Maybe run a 2 for 1 special?

Pinguinite.com EcuadorTreasures.ec

Pinguinite  posted on  2008-02-11   3:03:22 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#343. To: Pinguinite, christine (#341)

Yes, that makes good sense, thank you.

It's an honor to be even a small part of 4um.


“The individual is handicapped by coming face-to-face with a conspiracy so monstrous he cannot believe it exists.” ~ J. Edgar Hoover

wudidiz  posted on  2008-02-11   3:24:07 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#344. To: Pinguinite (#342)

Could you give him a piece of mine, too? Maybe run a 2 for 1 special?

Gladly.


“The individual is handicapped by coming face-to-face with a conspiracy so monstrous he cannot believe it exists.” ~ J. Edgar Hoover

wudidiz  posted on  2008-02-11   3:28:03 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#345. To: wudidiz (#344)

wud...

A lot of good pieces make for a good 4um.

Cynicom  posted on  2008-02-11   3:30:06 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#346. To: wudidiz (#326)

That's alot o' 2's, eh?

Coincidence?

There are no coincidences, it is all planned well out in advance. Is it a coincidence that Bush, Cheney, Obama, and John Kerry are all related? I think not.

God is always good!

RickyJ  posted on  2008-02-11   3:31:43 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#347. To: Cynicom (#345)

Yes.


“The individual is handicapped by coming face-to-face with a conspiracy so monstrous he cannot believe it exists.” ~ J. Edgar Hoover

wudidiz  posted on  2008-02-11   3:33:33 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#348. To: All (#347)

03:33:33

LOL

Oh dear...


“The individual is handicapped by coming face-to-face with a conspiracy so monstrous he cannot believe it exists.” ~ J. Edgar Hoover

wudidiz  posted on  2008-02-11   3:34:22 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#349. To: RickyJ (#346)

Is it a coincidence that Bush, Cheney, Obama, and John Kerry are all related?

Really?

_______  posted on  2008-02-11   3:34:30 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#350. To: _______, RickyJ, Cynicom, Pinguinite, All (#347)

03:33:33

That's alot of threes.

It's getting close to bedtime.


“The individual is handicapped by coming face-to-face with a conspiracy so monstrous he cannot believe it exists.” ~ J. Edgar Hoover

wudidiz  posted on  2008-02-11   3:36:56 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#351. To: wudidiz (#348)

no way

_______  posted on  2008-02-11   3:37:07 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#352. To: _______ (#351)

way


“The individual is handicapped by coming face-to-face with a conspiracy so monstrous he cannot believe it exists.” ~ J. Edgar Hoover

wudidiz  posted on  2008-02-11   3:38:29 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#353. To: _______ (#349)

Is it a coincidence that Bush, Cheney, Obama, and John Kerry are all related?

Yes it is a coincidence.

My Father and Bushes Mother are not too far distant relation. I am no relation to the SOB.

Cynicom  posted on  2008-02-11   3:38:54 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#354. To: wudidiz (#352)

dude

_______  posted on  2008-02-11   3:39:17 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#355. To: _______ (#354)

I know


“The individual is handicapped by coming face-to-face with a conspiracy so monstrous he cannot believe it exists.” ~ J. Edgar Hoover

wudidiz  posted on  2008-02-11   3:41:30 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#356. To: wudidiz (#355)

To: Sir Francis Dashwood

Welcome to the “No Party” conservatives, Sir Francis! It can be a lonely place, but it’s really like you have finally got control of your life. We never had control of the GOP. It’s kind of nice not having to worry about the John McCains and Huckabees of the GOP world. You can tie your own shoes and make your own breakfast, and never have to answer to a RINO as to “why” you are what you are! It’s really rather uplifting.

32 posted on 02/11/2008 12:38:56 AM PST by levotb

Cathartic experience at freak republic.

_______  posted on  2008-02-11   3:45:28 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#357. To: Cynicom, _______ (#353)


“The individual is handicapped by coming face-to-face with a conspiracy so monstrous he cannot believe it exists.” ~ J. Edgar Hoover

wudidiz  posted on  2008-02-11   3:45:34 ET  (1 image) Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#358. To: wudidiz (#357)

Personification of evil.

_______  posted on  2008-02-11   3:48:06 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#359. To: _______ (#356)

It’s really rather uplifting.

That's funny.


“The individual is handicapped by coming face-to-face with a conspiracy so monstrous he cannot believe it exists.” ~ J. Edgar Hoover

wudidiz  posted on  2008-02-11   3:48:11 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#360. To: wudidiz (#359)

That site will never go for McNuts.

They're realizing they're in the resistance now.

LOL

Where were they when it could have mattered?

_______  posted on  2008-02-11   3:49:18 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#361. To: _______ (#358)

Did you hear the story about that Satanist that did that ancient rite and got her pregnant or something like that?


“The individual is handicapped by coming face-to-face with a conspiracy so monstrous he cannot believe it exists.” ~ J. Edgar Hoover

wudidiz  posted on  2008-02-11   3:49:46 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#362. To: wudidiz (#357)

Ben Franklin was also an Uncle along the line somewhere so that compensates for the Bush trash side of the family.

Cynicom  posted on  2008-02-11   3:50:12 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#363. To: wudidiz (#361)

Hell no?

_______  posted on  2008-02-11   3:51:03 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#364. To: Cynicom (#362)

I got Dowds and Eisenhower but I never knew them at all.

_______  posted on  2008-02-11   3:51:30 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#365. To: _______ (#364) (Edited)

You ribbing me cause I have a trash segment of my family? My pride is wounded.

Cynicom  posted on  2008-02-11   3:53:46 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#366. To: Cynicom (#365)

No rip. I've got from slave to master in my lineage and it means nothing to me whatsoever.

I just find that we all don't come from that terribly many different lines.

Or we didn't.

_______  posted on  2008-02-11   3:55:33 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#367. To: _______, Cynicom (#363) (Edited)

Hell no?

Yeah, well my memory doesn't serve me as well as I'd like (freakin' chemtrails?)

Anyway, I'll ping you if I recall the details, but here, in the meantime, check out the similarities in the pictures HERE.


“The individual is handicapped by coming face-to-face with a conspiracy so monstrous he cannot believe it exists.” ~ J. Edgar Hoover

wudidiz  posted on  2008-02-11   3:55:57 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#368. To: wudidiz (#357)

NO wonder Chimp is a nut case...a totally dysfuctional family and crackerjack nutcase for a mom.,,which is probably why he's a closet fag.

Law Enforcement Against Prohibition

"There is no 'legitimate' Corporation by virtue of it's very legal definition and purpose."
-- IndieTx

"Corporation: An entity created for the legal protection of its human parasites, whose sole purpose is profit and self-perpetuation." © IndieTx

IndieTX  posted on  2008-02-11   3:56:17 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#369. To: Pinguinite (#341)

This thread is a great thread, actually. I was thinking to myself this evening that unlike LP, this thread is full of real discussion between people who strongly disagree, and there's yet to be any mudslinging

EAT ME Dickhead! (just kidding ;-) The disappointment has me feeling a little cagey...my way of avoiding breaking things...LOL.

Law Enforcement Against Prohibition

"There is no 'legitimate' Corporation by virtue of it's very legal definition and purpose."
-- IndieTx

"Corporation: An entity created for the legal protection of its human parasites, whose sole purpose is profit and self-perpetuation." © IndieTx

IndieTX  posted on  2008-02-11   3:57:57 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#370. To: IndieTX (#368)


“The individual is handicapped by coming face-to-face with a conspiracy so monstrous he cannot believe it exists.” ~ J. Edgar Hoover

wudidiz  posted on  2008-02-11   3:59:06 ET  (1 image) Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#371. To: IndieTX (#368)

,which is probably why he's a closet fag.

I would give odds on that. Only Laura knows for sure.

Cynicom  posted on  2008-02-11   3:59:07 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#372. To: All (#371)

Uh-oh... here come the gay Bush pictures...


“The individual is handicapped by coming face-to-face with a conspiracy so monstrous he cannot believe it exists.” ~ J. Edgar Hoover

wudidiz  posted on  2008-02-11   4:01:23 ET  (1 image) Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#373. To: All (#372)


“The individual is handicapped by coming face-to-face with a conspiracy so monstrous he cannot believe it exists.” ~ J. Edgar Hoover

wudidiz  posted on  2008-02-11   4:02:26 ET  (1 image) Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#374. To: wudidiz (#367)

Wow, same nose and eyes.

_______  posted on  2008-02-11   4:02:34 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#375. To: All (#373)


“The individual is handicapped by coming face-to-face with a conspiracy so monstrous he cannot believe it exists.” ~ J. Edgar Hoover

wudidiz  posted on  2008-02-11   4:03:53 ET  (1 image) Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#376. To: IndieTX (#368)

Plus, Poppy was gone so much what with important CIA work like assasinating a President, running drugs, securing hostages for missiles, securing the NWO.

You know.

_______  posted on  2008-02-11   4:06:11 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#377. To: _______ (#374)

Wow, same nose and eyes.

Yes, I went through a phase in my development where I was headfirst into that sort of thing.

I seem to have filed alot of the stuff I learned under 'F' for forget...

Satanists - what a bunch of clowns.


“The individual is handicapped by coming face-to-face with a conspiracy so monstrous he cannot believe it exists.” ~ J. Edgar Hoover

wudidiz  posted on  2008-02-11   4:06:16 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#378. To: wudidiz (#375)

That one pretty much sums it up.

Now put the Bush-Clinton crime family together.

_______  posted on  2008-02-11   4:07:32 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#379. To: wudidiz (#377)

The whole child sacrifice rituals really makes me uncomfortable with them.

_______  posted on  2008-02-11   4:09:21 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#380. To: _______, IndieTX, Cynicom (#376)

Poppy was gone so much what with important CIA work like assasinating a President , running drugs, securing hostages for missiles, securing the NWO.

You know.


“The individual is handicapped by coming face-to-face with a conspiracy so monstrous he cannot believe it exists.” ~ J. Edgar Hoover

wudidiz  posted on  2008-02-11   4:12:16 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#381. To: _______ (#379)

The whole child sacrifice rituals really makes me uncomfortable with them.

LOL

Yeah, talk about effed up.


“The individual is handicapped by coming face-to-face with a conspiracy so monstrous he cannot believe it exists.” ~ J. Edgar Hoover

wudidiz  posted on  2008-02-11   4:13:29 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#382. To: All (#381)


“The individual is handicapped by coming face-to-face with a conspiracy so monstrous he cannot believe it exists.” ~ J. Edgar Hoover

wudidiz  posted on  2008-02-11   4:18:58 ET  (1 image) Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#383. To: All (#382)

You gotta admit, she looks pretty hot in polka-dots.


“The individual is handicapped by coming face-to-face with a conspiracy so monstrous he cannot believe it exists.” ~ J. Edgar Hoover

wudidiz  posted on  2008-02-11   4:20:07 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#384. To: wudidiz (#340)

know that I'll be givin' that yukon a piece of my mind next time I come across him.

Don't do that!!! Then he will have some brains!!!


My spelling is Wobbly. It's good spelling but it Wobbles,
and the letters get in the wrong places.
-- Winnie the Pooh

farmfriend  posted on  2008-02-11   7:46:29 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#385. To: _______, wudidiz (#360)

Where were they when it could have mattered?

Drinking the Kool-Aide.


My spelling is Wobbly. It's good spelling but it Wobbles,
and the letters get in the wrong places.
-- Winnie the Pooh

farmfriend  posted on  2008-02-11   7:51:15 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#386. To: hammerdown (#308)

Amen Hammer. But let's not let facts get in the way of a freaking meltdown.

Peppa  posted on  2008-02-11   9:04:12 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#387. To: HOUNDDAWG (#329)

Yeah, give away the Panama Canal type of Democrat.

C'mon Dawg, he wore a sweater, gave us gas lines to teach us a lesson, and told us, you people need to just bend over, it's going to get worse. THAT is inspirational on the level of McCains 100 year war, jobs ain't coming back and 75 buck lettuce. True Liberal, True Conservative...just what the docta ordered!/s

Peppa  posted on  2008-02-11   9:06:19 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#388. To: Peppa (#387)

C'mon Dawg, he wore a sweater, gave us gas lines to teach us a lesson, and told us, you people need to just bend over, it's going to get worse. THAT is inspirational on the level of McCains 100 year war, jobs ain't coming back and 75 buck lettuce. True Liberal, True Conservative...just what the docta ordered!/s

Yup, he was the other side of the CFR coin that was flipped each time we changed sock puppets.

He was introduced at the CFR hootenanny as the next President of the US two years before the election!

He even spoke Espanol when he addressed the nation and despite how impressive that was, I had a creepy feeling that it would bring in loads of them other peepul from fir away landz.

Hell, I had never even seen a Mexican then, and I assumed that they wore sombreros and took siestas and were slow and friendly.

After I landed in LA 3 years later that picture changed. Those gang bangers with those ghastly facial tats (all blue ink-jailhouse tats) hairnets and plaid shirts with the top button always buttoned. Mister I'm hear to tell you that it was dam scary to me!

I learned that they never shot gavachos unless we actively looked for trouble, but I learned that in my part of Los Angeles County there was an excellent chance of catching a falling projectile from the hundreds that were fired into the air during the course of a normal week. (like an Iraqi wedding or sumthin)

One Mex fellow told me how he decided to test his new Marlin .30-30 rifle in his living room to impress his friends, so he put a mattress against the wall (to serve as a bullet trap/backstop) and fired, killing his two year old daughter in her crib in the bedroom behind the wall the mattress was leaned against.

The DA recommended (and the grand jury agreed) to no-bill him because he had "suffered enough". And, like a person of diminished capacity it was assumed that he didn't have the grey matter to grasp the dynamics of external ballistics, and therefore was not even guilty of negligent homicide!

The logic became clear as time went on. If he went to prison his family would be on welfare and he was a working man with no gang affiliation, and how great of a loss was "just another Mexican-American female anchor baby", anyway?

"'Schools is educationy' ; A message from our president."

HOUNDDAWG  posted on  2008-02-11   9:36:21 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#389. To: Cynicom (#353)

I wouldn't go publicizing that connection. You did have some respect on this board.

angle  posted on  2008-02-11   9:44:58 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#390. To: HOUNDDAWG (#388)

That was beautiful, ROFL!!!

I have never figured out the appeal of the hairnet, on anyone. If you are in the foodservice line of work, hairnet good. Some need one for their chest. If you are NOT at work, take it off, it no longer has that certain allure. That said, I could never get past nets on ladies hats anyway, it always looked like they were being swarmed by gnats, and who can say, wow, ain't she a hot chil' in the city.

Meanwhile back to Carter. Big Teeth. That and hairnets are off-putting.

Peppa  posted on  2008-02-11   9:54:53 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#391. To: Original_Intent (#259)

I agree, and not a bad analogy. The alternative is to leave with no forwarding, like Bollyn did. Not much of a choice.

Ron Paul for President - Join a Ron Paul Meetup group today! The Revolution will not be televised!
I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it.-T Jefferson

robin  posted on  2008-02-11   10:06:08 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#392. To: IndieTX (#369)

LOL! You always gotta go out and ruin a good thing, don't you?

Pinguinite.com EcuadorTreasures.ec

Pinguinite  posted on  2008-02-11   10:06:18 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#393. To: wudidiz (#279)

I suspect that maybe Ron Paul was threatened.

That's what the poster I reposted in post #2 suspected. That the Trotsky quote was a sign like "Tell it to the Marines".

Ron Paul for President - Join a Ron Paul Meetup group today! The Revolution will not be televised!
I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it.-T Jefferson

robin  posted on  2008-02-11   10:07:27 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#394. To: HOUNDDAWG (#329)

I was comparing Obama to Hillary and McCain.

Who are you voting for in Nov?

Ron Paul for President - Join a Ron Paul Meetup group today! The Revolution will not be televised!
I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it.-T Jefferson

robin  posted on  2008-02-11   10:12:06 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#395. To: robin, christine, lodwick (#394)

I personally (and in my opinion) invested a material and significant amount of time, effort and money into the Ron Paul Revolution. I know there are others out there who did at least as much and even much, much more.

Now, I have a headache.

This would now be my advice to Ron Paul:

Being Dr. No in the House of Representatives is accomplishing nothing--it hasn't and it won't.

If the man sincerely has the political revolution in his heart, he should abandon the Republican (/Democrat) party. He should abandon the House of Representatives. Ron Paul should announce and organize a third political party not as a candidate but as a figurehead--a leader--a centerpoint under which candidates are groomed and supported at all levels of American government. The seed money is in place. The organization is in place. The time is ripe.

They are very of afraid of Ron Paul. Good.

wbales  posted on  2008-02-11   10:47:38 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#396. To: wbales (#395)

I do agree. Check out post #2's idea (from another blog); perhaps his hand is being forced.

Ron Paul for President - Join a Ron Paul Meetup group today! The Revolution will not be televised!
I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it.-T Jefferson

robin  posted on  2008-02-11   10:49:40 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#397. To: robin (#396)

perhaps his hand is being forced

When and if Paul, you, I or any American succumbs to force, threats, and/or intimidation, all is lost.

They are very of afraid of Ron Paul. Good.

wbales  posted on  2008-02-11   10:56:52 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#398. To: Cynicom (#258)

His own presentations were an indicator, allowing lesser men to mock him in front of millions was wrong and someone should have told him so.

Maybe Ron should have taken the high road and just walked over and knocked the smirk off some of them's faces, ya think?

Or gone the low road and just acted like a gentleman, leaving the impression the guy is 'presidential even when confronted by someone throwing rotten eggs'.

Personally, he shoulda taken the high road.........he'd have been laughed off the stage and into the dustbin of history, but man oh man, would we have all gotten a huge 'high' from such an action....ya gotta love a macho president! Fergit all that diplomacy sheet, and just duke it out. It just adds so much credibility to the rest of your policies/principles/whatever.

God wants spiritual fruits, not religious nuts!

rowdee  posted on  2008-02-11   11:28:26 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#399. To: hammerdown, IndieTx, Jethro Tull, Esso (#308)

sigh....then that would make Indie's, JT's, Esso's, and other's opinions that it's too late to work within the system dead on. (pun intended) RP and a R3volution within the corporation never had a chance.

where's V?

The only solution to this mess is to dig a hole big enough to nudge them all in and cover quickly

christine  posted on  2008-02-11   11:38:59 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#400. To: rowdee (#398)

Maybe Ron should have taken the high road and just walked over and knocked the smirk off some of them's faces, ya think?

Pauls fellow "republicans" were to me a slimy lot.

Telling them so on TV would have been news that no one could overlook.

As it is he took the high road and here we are.

Cynicom  posted on  2008-02-11   11:40:18 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#401. To: hammerdown (#308)

Thank you for your good words, hammer........all this whining and bitching has got me baffled. I will say it seems like they are like the bushbots in that they hear and see what they want to.

God wants spiritual fruits, not religious nuts!

rowdee  posted on  2008-02-11   11:42:28 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#402. To: wbales, rowdee (#395)

If the man sincerely has the political revolution in his heart, he should abandon the Republican (/Democrat) party. He should abandon the House of Representatives. Ron Paul should announce and organize a third political party not as a candidate but as a figurehead--a leader--a centerpoint under which candidates are groomed and supported at all levels of American government. The seed money is in place. The organization is in place. The time is ripe.

yes, that's my sentiment too. and, dee, yes, take the gloves off, the time for niceties and silence is way gone.

The only solution to this mess is to dig a hole big enough to nudge them all in and cover quickly

christine  posted on  2008-02-11   11:43:51 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#403. To: Cynicom (#400)

Telling them so on TV would have been news that no one could overlook.

yep

The only solution to this mess is to dig a hole big enough to nudge them all in and cover quickly

christine  posted on  2008-02-11   11:44:41 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#404. To: christinewbales, rowdee (#403) (Edited)

Cynicom  posted on  2008-02-11   11:55:19 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#405. To: christinew, bales, rowdee (#403)

And here we stand, in the middle of Main Street, USA, with egg on our face, holding an empty burlap bag with a hole in the bottom, and our Pied Piper has bummed a dollar off us to take a coffee break.

Cynicom  posted on  2008-02-11   11:55:53 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#406. To: christine, wbales, rowdee (#403)

And here we stand, in the middle of Main Street, USA, with egg on our face, holding an empty burlap bag with a hole in the bottom, and our Pied Piper has bummed a dollar off us to take a coffee break.

Cynicom  posted on  2008-02-11   11:57:32 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#407. To: wbales (#395)

If the man sincerely has the political revolution in his heart, he should abandon the Republican (/Democrat) party. He should abandon the House of Representatives. Ron Paul should announce and organize a third political party not as a candidate but as a figurehead--a leader--a centerpoint under which candidates are groomed and supported at all levels of American government. The seed money is in place. The organization is in place. The time is ripe.

If the man took a dive which some here seem to believe, uhh, why would you support him ever again?

It's the 'supporters' that took a dive here... and are trying to drag as many as possible with them. Not a bunch to rally around, as they are just as bad corrupting the process, just like the system already in place. Trust us! We're clean and pure, my ass.

Considering there are far better minds that have been elected to office 10 times around here, I'm pretty sure you would want a far better organization than the rag tag bunch of morons that raised a shitload of money for the guy some people want to crap on and vilify.

Peppa  posted on  2008-02-11   12:26:44 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#408. To: Peppa (#407)

It's the 'supporters' that took a dive here... and are trying to drag as many as possible with them. Not a bunch to rally around, as they are just as bad corrupting the process, just like the system already in place. Trust us! We're clean and pure, my ass.

Considering there are far better minds that have been elected to office 10 times around here, I'm pretty sure you would want a far better organization than the rag tag bunch of morons that raised a shitload of money for the guy some people want to crap on and vilify.

There is no excuse for such language.

Cynicom  posted on  2008-02-11   12:28:06 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#409. To: Cynicom (#408) (Edited)

There is no excuse for such language.

And you. Please call them to get your money back. Tell me, at what point did the ad fail to go in, before or after the HQ snubbed your phone call.

You know what, I think you are a malcontent in need of a soapbox and groupies.

Peppa  posted on  2008-02-11   12:36:20 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#410. To: Cynicom, Anyone who gives a damn anymore (#400)

And he could have taken the low road, Cyni, and been laughed off the stage......as being 'thin skinned', a 'whiner', or any other number of charming nicknames the msm would have blasted him with.

Then, we'd be sitting here discussing that our candidate has no tact, that he was too stupid to realize he was being set up and that he bought it.......or a gazillion other things. No doubt 9/11 and truthin would have gotten in the mix somehow.

I simply don't understand all this 'eating of our own' by people. Surely we're all grown up enough and savvy enough to realize msm wouldn't give him the time of day---but they weren't very good to folks like Tancredo, Hunter, Gilchrist, or Brownback, either. They were extremely effective during the debate periods of keeping the 'ball' out of his hands. And did you notice at the last one, they tried to keep the 'ball' away from Huckleberry, too?

Surely we're all grown up enough and savvy enough to know that if he took off on a tangent about gubmint sponsored or endorsed actions resulting in 9/11 that he would definitely been described as a fringe idiot, or worse, and would never be given the chance to explain, or explain adequately his reasoning.

I, for one, have never felt you had to 'read between the lines' to get a read of where Ron Paul stands or is coming from. Everytime I've heard him, he seems to know what he is saying and says it plainly. And yet he's challenged on that---look at how many "I thoughts' have been on these several threads. Not what "Ron thought or said", but "I thought". Has everyone lapsed back into bushbot mode?

God wants spiritual fruits, not religious nuts!

rowdee  posted on  2008-02-11   12:43:43 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#411. To: rowdee (#410)

Has everyone lapsed back into bushbot mode?

I hope not.

TwentyTwelve  posted on  2008-02-11   12:45:58 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#412. To: Peppa (#409)

There is no excuse for such language.

As you know, I do try to exercise proper social manners

Intentional gross language impresses no one. Never has and never will.

Cynicom  posted on  2008-02-11   12:47:10 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#413. To: christine (#402)

Exactly how many voters do you believe, chrissie, would cross over to vote for a violent person? He'd be laughed off the pages of history with his "Dean" moment.......and it would put a lie to his call for much more diplomacy.

I understand the frustration everyone is going through. I've been known to say I'd like to beat the shit outta somebody for this or that. I'd sure get a lot of satisfaction, but without control of myself, what would make me presidential.......more people would be thinking I was acting like a hitler or a stalin, or the current buzz.......a trotsky!

God wants spiritual fruits, not religious nuts!

rowdee  posted on  2008-02-11   12:47:26 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#414. To: rowdee (#410)

row...

Everyone has their own view and I respect yours.

Paul asked for money and support and people responded, however if they were to publish a graph of donations I suspect there would be a steep decline. The fact that he is paring back staff surely is an indicator. I am not the only "malcontent", there seems to be many thousands that have decided enough is enough.

Spamming me twice for money to run for Congress in Texas was a personal affront.

I supported, I gave a great deal of money and to me that entitles me to withdraw and make my views known. Paul elucidated his views and his intentions very well via email.

Cynicom  posted on  2008-02-11   12:53:54 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#415. To: Cynicom (#405)

Oh, Cyni........go wipe your face off--I didn't notice you have egg on it. :)

I've seen more genuine honest to goodness enthusiasm for the beloved Constitution and sound government in this primary election season than any other time in my adult life. I'm rejoicing over that. I'm rejoicing that instead of young people all tattoos, pierced, pinned, or whatever, I was able to see a side of American in our young people that I was damned near convinced no longer existed.

No one broke my arm, intimidated, nor threatened me into giving to a cause or person I believed in. I gave freely because I wanted the sounds of freedom to spread.

Why don't you send his campaign an email asking for your money back; that it was taken under false pretenses, and outline all of the pretenses you believe to be false. If that fails to gain a response, try emailing his congress addy, or mailing a letter to his home. And above all, find that 'unsubscribe' hyperlink to get out of his system.

God wants spiritual fruits, not religious nuts!

rowdee  posted on  2008-02-11   12:54:28 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#416. To: Cynicom (#414)

Regarding cutting back on campaign staff.........I read a news article where they all typically do that after the big rush of primaries is over. It conserves funds for the later primaries, hopefully provides to get thru the convention cycle, and once the nominee is declared, they ramp it up again.

This is how they have people in states in place to 'jump on the bandwagon' after the convention's official nominee is announced. These are generally ramrodded by party diehards who keep lists of volunteers and the like, so in an instant they are behind the man, or woman.

I'll try not to address any of your concerns again, Cyni, because you are certainly entitled to lament whatever wrongs you've been the recipient of.

Best regards.....

God wants spiritual fruits, not religious nuts!

rowdee  posted on  2008-02-11   13:01:33 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#417. To: Peppa (#409)

You know what, I think you are a malcontent in need of a soapbox and groupies.

That might be a little strong, Pepp. I do believe Cyni is voicing things as he sees it. And, then again, you're entitled to think as you do.

I just hope things don't get carried away......frustrations and stress often make people go beyond civility. And while apologies can be made and accepted, once a word is spoken or written, its out there for eternity. Seems there's always a downside to something....many a time I thought I was right and said so, oftentimes in unflattering terms, and while sincerely apologizing, it's still out there and can be brought to mind in an instant.

God wants spiritual fruits, not religious nuts!

rowdee  posted on  2008-02-11   13:18:11 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#418. To: wudidiz (#383)

You gotta admit, she looks pretty hot in polka-dots.

I believe I know someone who just *might* need to go in for a thorough vision exam. ;^)

Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end.
Lord Acton

James Deffenbach  posted on  2008-02-11   13:19:56 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#419. To: Cynicom (#414)

I supported, I gave a great deal of money and to me that entitles me to withdraw and make my views known.

The whole world knows that you are upset with Ron Paul.

Why don't you use your energy to expose Hillary, Obama, and McCain?

TwentyTwelve  posted on  2008-02-11   13:20:01 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#420. To: Cynicom, LACUMO (#414)

I don't hold RP's unwillingness to run Third Party (a lost cause - if you think he was invisible before, wait until he tries to run Libertarian or Constitution Party again) against him.

What I find very strange is that he won't commit his energy, his supporters, and his substantial campaign contributions to keeping up the fight against a McCain victory. It's obvious that he won't win, but if his goal was to be a "message candidate," what better time to get the message out when the likely GOP nominee is the worst that they've ever had? Why won't he come out and say that he will refuse to endorse McCain's candidacy for President?

Rupert_Pupkin  posted on  2008-02-11   13:20:18 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#421. To: TwentyTwelve (#419)

Why don't you use your energy to expose Hillary, Obama, and McCain?

Let's just let it be a surprise?

McHillobama should be a good lesson in 'how to grovel before the man' for all of us. /s

_______  posted on  2008-02-11   13:23:12 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#422. To: Rupert_Pupkin (#420)

I am a Republican.

I love the Republican Party.

I've always been a Republican.

My parents were Republicans.

It's good to be a Republican.

_______  posted on  2008-02-11   13:24:33 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#423. To: _______ (#422)

I really hope that's not the long and short of it, but it's beginning to look like that.

It's starting to remind me of Pat Buchanan - who started out fighting the good fight, but then gave a glowing endorsement of Bush in 2004 with some idiocy about "coming back home" to the GOP.

Rupert_Pupkin  posted on  2008-02-11   13:27:40 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#424. To: robin, Pinguinite, christine, all (#0)

I also gave money to his campaign ($25), but have no reason to give any more.

While I would have liked to see better use of the money donated, consider this: Much of his legitimacy (little that he had given the inherent bias) from the mainstream media came from the fact of his phenomenal grassroots fund raising. It's the only legitimacy that the gatekeepers recognized. His invitations to the various "debates" would have been much fewer had he only raised 1 or 2 million dollars. What our donations paid for was a foot in the door. I hope that the remaining funds are put to good use somehow.

The problem that I see now is that people are ignoring the message that he'd been spreading during his candidacy. The issues he raised are absolutely correct whatever you think of him as a man and the decisions he made. The Ron Paul R3volution is not and should never have been about the man. Listening to him during the campaign, I learned about stuff I thought I already understood. One can only hope that enough people "got it" that these facts can be passed on to our posterity, or even if it is a foreign nation/culture that picks up the banner of liberty.

It reminds me of (and in a way the problem is somewhat related) of America's ubiquitous Jesus worshippers who completely ignore Christ's message of how to get along with the rest of the world. They care nothing of the message, only whether or not they are "saved".


From Two Party System... ...to Two Family System.

PnbC  posted on  2008-02-11   13:31:47 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#425. To: Rupert_Pupkin (#423)

I remember all too well. I parted ways with the GOP now.

_______  posted on  2008-02-11   13:34:24 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#426. To: PnbC (#424)

Jesus didn't quit on the way to the cross.

_______  posted on  2008-02-11   13:35:49 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#427. To: PnbC (#424)

The Ron Paul R3volution is not and should never have been about the man. Listening to him during the campaign, I learned about stuff I thought I already understood. One can only hope that enough people "got it" that these facts can be passed on to our posterity, or even if it is a foreign nation/culture that picks up the banner of liberty

True, it should be about the message, not the messenger.

That doesn't mean that the messenger should just give up the fight, especially not with somebody like McCain as the likely GOP nominee.

Rupert_Pupkin  posted on  2008-02-11   13:40:15 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#428. To: _______ (#426)

Jesus didn't quit on the way to the cross.

You illustrate my point. You are focusing on the personality, not the teaching.


From Two Party System... ...to Two Family System.

PnbC  posted on  2008-02-11   13:42:39 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#429. To: PnbC (#428)

NO, I'm not.

Right now, I'm not focusing on anything.

I have that right today.

_______  posted on  2008-02-11   13:47:32 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#430. To: PnbC (#428)

You're right. The real reason for RP's failure is not his mediocre campaign style or even his lack of media coverage. The real reason he failed is that there are millions of people in this country who think that John McCain and Hillary Clinton are good candidates who deserve their support. If they were really unhappy with establishment candidates, voters would actively look for alternatives through alternative media, CNN and Fox be damned.

Rupert_Pupkin  posted on  2008-02-11   13:50:31 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#431. To: Rupert_Pupkin (#430)

The real reason he failed is that there are millions of people in this country who think that John McCain and Hillary Clinton are good candidates who deserve their support

They have voted for more war and war they shall have.

Cynicom  posted on  2008-02-11   13:52:44 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#432. To: All (#429)

I did learn how important the Republican Party is.

I did learn that a House seat for 11 terms is more important than running a National Campaign through to the McHillobama (s)election in November.

Paul might even get an opportunity to formally vote on the North American Community Charter if he stays around long enough.

_______  posted on  2008-02-11   13:56:04 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#433. To: Rupert_Pupkin (#427)

I don't claim to fully understand his motives, and maybe he was pressured in some unspoken way (re. Trotsky comment)like Perot allegedly was. But it's just speculation at this point. Maybe he can explain it in his memoirs, I hope. I don't think running 3rd party would have helped at this point. What might be nice is if someone else running on Ron Paul's policies as a 3rd party received all the unused campaign money it would help.

If it's Obama vs McHitler, I will strongly be inclined to vote Obama if only to prevent complete disaster -- but NOT if Obama is running on a ticket with Hillary (either as prez or vp). Then I would vote 3rd party (again) or not at all.

At least Ron Paul's exit this early gives everyone some extra time to consider what happens next.


From Two Party System... ...to Two Family System.

PnbC  posted on  2008-02-11   13:59:47 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#434. To: PnbC (#433) (Edited)

If it's Obama vs McHitler, I will strongly be inclined to vote Obama if only to prevent complete disaster -- but NOT if Obama is running on a ticket with Hillary (either as prez or vp). Then I would vote 3rd party (again) or not at all.

That's how I'm leaning too. Obama will be terrible for this country - increased welfare, affirmative action, open borders, gun grabbing, and misguided "peacekeeping" missions around the world. It will be like having a younger, darker Jimmy Carter in the WH.

But I'll take Jimmy Carter over General Jack T. Ripper (Sterling Hayden's "purity of essence" character in DOCTOR STRANGELOVE) any day. More welfare is a lesser evil than nuclear war. With Hillary though, all bets are off.

Rupert_Pupkin  posted on  2008-02-11   14:05:24 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#435. To: rowdee (#417)

That might be a little strong, Pepp. I do believe Cyni is voicing things as he sees it. And, then again, you're entitled to think as you do.

I just hope things don't get carried away......frustrations and stress often make people go beyond civility. And while apologies can be made and accepted, once a word is spoken or written, its out there for eternity. Seems there's always a downside to something....many a time I thought I was right and said so, oftentimes in unflattering terms, and while sincerely apologizing, it's still out there and can be brought to mind in an instant.

Not strong enough. For Sale: 1 Unity Onion.

Peppa  posted on  2008-02-11   14:07:31 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#436. To: PnbC, rowdee (#424)

you make some good points. still, i agree with Alex Jones who said awhile ago, if he were Ron Paul, he would throw caution to the wind.

The only solution to this mess is to dig a hole big enough to nudge them all in and cover quickly

christine  posted on  2008-02-11   14:10:08 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#437. To: TwentyTwelve (#419)

2012

2012

That is an oblique insult. And I resent it.

Cynicom  posted on  2008-02-11   14:10:36 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#438. To: rowdee (#435)

*Note to self: DO NOT LAUGH! I REPEAT, DO NOT LAUGH"!!

"Additional Note to self: And wipe that silly grin off your face!!!"

God wants spiritual fruits, not religious nuts!

rowdee  posted on  2008-02-11   14:10:43 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#439. To: christine (#436)

What can I say, other than, "Thank goodness, Ron Paul is the voice of reason and not some hothead, as Alex has been called at times." :)

Alex is behind a mic, no election or campaigning, no duty/responsibility to constituents. He can say what he wishes. OTOH, a candidate for office has to tread a thin line. They're under scrutiny all the time by opposition. A fart turns into a hurricane when reported in msm. A burp turns to vomit.

Surely, you'll get a handful of votes or applause from those who saw or heard ya.......but when the line of vision or the cord to the mic is pulled by someone, how do you propose to get your hardhitting, calling a spade a spade message across? Smoke signals? That's about all you'll be seen.....

All these smart, sharp reports sound great til the rubber meets the road. Same for smacking someone across the chops for treating you like a moron.......forever the image of Howard Dean doing his savage gutteral scream is implanted in the minds of the american sheeple. Its always mentioned.........is that what we want for the guy that is trying to convince americans that foreign policy should be different, or that our monetary policy is killing us, or that the Constitution matters? Some loony bin spouting off about money, foreign policy, economics, Constitution when he should be in some asylum taking meds? Or how about him smacking someones chops and getting tossed in the hoosegow for assault and battery--even if he was let go within 6 hours--there's your jailbird stigma!

I'm sure glad I picked a winner, if he never officially wins. He's a man of highest integrity, honesty, principled, a family man, a lover of the Constitution, and a gentle man as well as gentleman. Can all those things be said of the other candidates in the hunt?

God wants spiritual fruits, not religious nuts!

rowdee  posted on  2008-02-11   14:22:50 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#440. To: rowdee (#438)

*Note to self: DO NOT LAUGH! I REPEAT, DO NOT LAUGH"!!

"Additional Note to self: And wipe that silly grin off your face!!!"

LOL!

Wanna buy and unyum?

Peppa  posted on  2008-02-11   14:29:42 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#441. To: robin (#4)

if you're referring to the person who claimed to be charoltte iserbyte, she is fully credible. if she claims to have gotten that message its true. the only question is, is the person who posted it really iserbyte.

(not that any of it makes much diff anyway '-0

"I don't know where Bin Laden is. I truly am not that concerned about him"
George W, Bush, 3/13/02 http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2002/03/20020313-8.html

Artisan  posted on  2008-02-11   14:38:19 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#442. To: Peppa (#407)

"It does not take a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brush fires of freedom in the minds of men." -- Samuel Adams (1722-1803)‡

ghostdogtxn  posted on  2008-02-11   15:19:42 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#443. To: rowdee (#439)

"It does not take a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brush fires of freedom in the minds of men." -- Samuel Adams (1722-1803)‡

ghostdogtxn  posted on  2008-02-11   15:21:45 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#444. To: ghostdogtxn (#442)

Exactly.

Thanks, Peppa.

YW GDT. Not a pleasant situation.

Peppa  posted on  2008-02-11   15:30:37 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#445. To: robin (#394)

....Obama to Hillary and McCain.

Who are you voting for in Nov?

If those are the only choices then I won't vote.

In fact, I'm probably done voting.....forever

"'Schools is educationy' ; A message from our president."

HOUNDDAWG  posted on  2008-02-11   15:32:17 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#446. To: rowdee (#410)

And he could have taken the low road, Cyni, and been laughed off the stage......as being 'thin skinned', a 'whiner', or any other number of charming nicknames the msm would have blasted him with.

Then, we'd be sitting here discussing that our candidate has no tact, that he was too stupid to realize he was being set up and that he bought it.......or a gazillion other things. No doubt 9/11 and truthin would have gotten in the mix somehow.

I simply don't understand all this 'eating of our own' by people. Surely we're all grown up enough and savvy enough to realize msm wouldn't give him the time of day---but they weren't very good to folks like Tancredo, Hunter, Gilchrist, or Brownback, either. They were extremely effective during the debate periods of keeping the 'ball' out of his hands. And did you notice at the last one, they tried to keep the 'ball' away from Huckleberry, too?

Surely we're all grown up enough and savvy enough to know that if he took off on a tangent about gubmint sponsored or endorsed actions resulting in 9/11 that he would definitely been described as a fringe idiot, or worse, and would never be given the chance to explain, or explain adequately his reasoning.

I, for one, have never felt you had to 'read between the lines' to get a read of where Ron Paul stands or is coming from. Everytime I've heard him, he seems to know what he is saying and says it plainly. And yet he's challenged on that---look at how many "I thoughts' have been on these several threads. Not what "Ron thought or said", but "I thought". Has everyone lapsed back into bushbot mode?

Some won't believe in Ron Paul now unless he shows them the nail holes in his hands and feet.

"'Schools is educationy' ; A message from our president."

HOUNDDAWG  posted on  2008-02-11   15:43:52 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#447. To: ghostdogtxn. RP friends and supporters (#443)

And I still back him, and I'll still send him money. I'm no sunshine patriot.

Well said.

What else can we do when fighting for the very life of our country?

Join the Ron Paul Revolution
Freedom*Peace*Prosperity

Lod  posted on  2008-02-11   15:51:49 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#448. To: HOUNDDAWG (#446)

Some won't believe in Ron Paul now unless he shows them the nail holes in his hands and feet.

Just another inside job. I looked around yesterday, and saw a version of the 'dancing students'.

Peppa  posted on  2008-02-11   15:54:10 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#449. To: lodwick (#447)

What else can we do when fighting for the very life of our country?

Figure out who to trust.

Peppa  posted on  2008-02-11   15:55:02 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#450. To: christine (#96)

with everything you've said about the corrupt two party system, you'd now take part in it and lend legitimacy to it? good grief. i thought you and everyone else here KNEW it's a rigged system. the selection has already been made.

IF NOT RON PAUL. NO ONE. ROCK THE NO VOTE ONCE AGAIN.

Ya damn skippy! There certainly isn't anything worth voting for other than Ron, not unless Chuck Baldwin might run on the CP ticket. I would proudly vote for Chuck. Otherwise I haven't seen or heard of anyone I thought would be any good. I have been a longtime supporter of Ron's and I had hoped he was "in it to win it" as they say but this latest announcement doesn't look good.

Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end.
Lord Acton

James Deffenbach  posted on  2008-02-11   16:08:51 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#451. To: Cynicom (#252)

Makes me sick.

As well he should. His precious House seat is 95% safe - as in incumbency is the ultimate job insurance for politicians - and he absconded with untold millions of dollars in "money bombs." Toss his aging semi revolutionary carcass into the Republican Party bone yard with those of all the other political saviours who have come and gone in our lifetime.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2008-02-11   16:14:40 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#452. To: robin (#128)

OK, do you prefer McCain or Hillary? Those are your only other real alternatives at this point.

The alleged "choice" between McLame, Hitlery and Obammer is much akin to choosing between deciding whether to commit suicide by hanging yourself or ingesting rat poison. Neither is much of a way to go and those "choices" are not my idea of anyone I could ever vote for. I would rather stay home and not waste gas.

Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end.
Lord Acton

James Deffenbach  posted on  2008-02-11   17:55:34 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#453. To: HOUNDDAWG (#446)

Some won't believe in Ron Paul now unless he shows them the nail holes in his hands and feet.

What you say is gospel, dawgie.........and how very, very sad.

And all along he's tried to say its the message, its the message, and that he might not be the right messenger....but since he didn't walk on water, or at least turn it to wine, he's a phony, a fake, a money-hungry fanatic, a sleeze bag with no conscience or principles, no better than the rest, and if you read between the lines, you'll find that he's in bed with the man who represents all that Ron Paul despises! And I'll betcha someone will arrive at the 'fact' that he is a jew or some such......at least anything but white!

Hard to believe that everyone was duped--well, ceptin me and a handful of others.........I mean, the masses were really taken for a ride by this tinhorn texan.

God wants spiritual fruits, not religious nuts!

rowdee  posted on  2008-02-11   18:34:07 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#454. To: Peppa (#407)

If the man took a dive which some here seem to believe, uhh, why would you support him ever again?

That's f-ing stupid statement/question.

Therein, you ASSUME AND AVER that I, wbales, are among those "some" which here seem to believe that Ron Paul took a dive. There is NOTHING in my posts serving as a factual basis for your query. That being said, I support the Political Revolution which far exceeds the man, Ron Paul. I shall, however, support him and anyone associated therewith, even tangentially.

They are very of afraid of Ron Paul. Good.

wbales  posted on  2008-02-11   19:28:52 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#455. To: christine (#96)

with everything you've said about the corrupt two party system, you'd now take part in it and lend legitimacy to it? good grief. i thought you and everyone else here KNEW it's a rigged system. the selection has already been made.

IF NOT RON PAUL. NO ONE. ROCK THE NO VOTE ONCE AGAIN.

I understand and I respect your disappointment.

My views on the corrupt 2-party system have not changed a bit. If I vote for Obama in November, and it's very likely that I will if McCain would become the US president unless someone defeats him, I would not do it with pleasure. There are many things I don't care about in Obama's views. However, there are some positives that I would like to point:

- He is not taking PAC money. Unless he lies, this is very positive. My hope is that, once president, he would pressure the congress to end the PAC and the lobbying.

- He appears to be intelligent and he does not seem to be evil. Bill Clinton's evil nature was apparent to me from the second I saw/heard him and so was Bush's near-infinite dark stupidity but, in the case of Obama I can't see much evil.

- He is more white than black, and this is probably his darkest and deepest secret. It's possible that not even his wife are aware of it.

- His partial black nature should help the white-black reconciliation a lot more than Clinton demagoguery.

- While clearly leaning toward socialism and collectivism, his mind does not appear to be completely closed.

- He does not seem to be seeking power for the sake of possessing it and exercising it.

- As someone who taught 'Constitution' he may be showing more respect for that document than a Clinton or a Bush.

- He is neither Clinton and he is not Bush.

- As one who doesn't care for PAC financing, he might be less vulnerable to AIPAC's attempts at control.

He is more a populist than he is a Demo. I doubt that the Demo establishment wishes to have Obama in the WH.

I understand why not everyone would want to vote for Obama and I will not try to persuade anyone to do so. I know that my own kids would have a hard time voting for him if they were of voting age - Obama says keep the kids away from the Teevee unless you want them to grow up dumb so, when I asked them to choose between the 'no Teevee' Obama and the McCain alternative who would send them to fight some stupid wars, they both demanded for a third alternative. To conclude, if I end up pulling the lever (so to speak) for Obama, I will do it not only for reasons of he being the lesser evil but also because I do see some qualities in him.

Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'

a vast rightwing conspirator  posted on  2008-02-11   19:28:59 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#456. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#455)

he might be less vulnerable to AIPAC's attempts at control.

Nonsense. Excuse my cynicism, but Obama wouldn't be where he is today but for the blessing of Tel Aviv. They are ALL under thier thumb.

They are very of afraid of Ron Paul. Good.

wbales  posted on  2008-02-11   19:32:32 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#457. To: wbales (#456)

There was some score that Ha'aretz is assigning to the candidates to the US presidency, from the p.o.v. of how good they were for Israel. Obama had the lowest score of them all. The article was posted at this site a couple of weeks ago.

Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'

a vast rightwing conspirator  posted on  2008-02-11   19:35:24 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#458. To: Rupert_Pupkin (#420)

What I find very strange is that he won't commit his energy, his supporters, and his substantial campaign contributions to keeping up the fight against a McCain victory. It's obvious that he won't win, but if his goal was to be a "message candidate," what better time to get the message out when the likely GOP nominee is the worst that they've ever had? Why won't he come out and say that he will refuse to endorse McCain's candidacy for President?

A very valid and asute observation.

They are very of afraid of Ron Paul. Good.

wbales  posted on  2008-02-11   19:36:03 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#459. To: wbales (#456) (Edited)

You got that right. Go Mcbamaton!

nobody  posted on  2008-02-11   19:36:34 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#460. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#457)

Obama had the lowest score of them all.

And what was that? 94 out of 100?

An American presidential candidate must have the blessing of Tel Aviv as a condition precedent to running.

They are very of afraid of Ron Paul. Good.

wbales  posted on  2008-02-11   19:38:38 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#461. To: wbales (#460)

I believe, and my recall may not be perfect, Giuliani had the highest score, in the 700's, followed closely by McCain and Hillary. Obama had something like 300. Perhaps someone can find that article.

Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'

a vast rightwing conspirator  posted on  2008-02-11   19:44:16 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#462. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#457)

Obama had the lowest score of them all.

As an aside and I was pondering, where was Ron Paul in that scoring??

Was he totally left out as per federal Ziomedia procedure??

Did this poll not mention Paul as he was in negative numbers???

They are very of afraid of Ron Paul. Good.

wbales  posted on  2008-02-11   19:47:02 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#463. To: Peppa (#212)

Don't trip on your ego, it's the only thing that makes you half way attractive.

You should find the strength and the intelligence inside yourself to acknowledge your mistakes and misjudgments. The ability to learn from past mistakes is not even reserved to human nature, it's part of most sentient beings' nature.

Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'

a vast rightwing conspirator  posted on  2008-02-11   19:49:16 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#464. To: wbales (#462)

Yes, the article stated that RP's Israel attitude was so low, he didn't get a score. It was probably close to zero or maybe negative.

Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'

a vast rightwing conspirator  posted on  2008-02-11   19:50:13 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#465. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#461)

Giuliani had the highest score, in the 700's, followed closely by McCain and Hillary. Obama had something like 300.

So, a perfect score for Israel would have been 200 or so.

HHHHMM, I wonder if any other countries have polls on which American president would be best for thier particular country? Or, does only Israel do this?

They are very of afraid of Ron Paul. Good.

wbales  posted on  2008-02-11   19:50:22 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#466. To: wbales (#454)

Therein, you ASSUME AND AVER that I, wbales, are among those "some" which here seem to believe that Ron Paul took a dive

No, that's not what I said. I said some here said he took a dive. And why would you want a that sort of candidate to lead your new effort. And further, why should his supporters rally around a new Party label, since the party is unnamed and unknown. You have a known entity, Ron Paul, but that is just not good enough. You have to know that people took ron paul out from the inside, are smearing him now, to force their will and desire of a new undefined party down our throats, or they'd rather see the message die, and RP go down in flames. It's their way or the highway. But worse.

The outrage should be directed at those who are dancing in glee over this smear of Ron Paul and those parading as 3rd party promoters, in that they have guaranteed more of the status quo.

That's my take Wbales. That you want to have new parties, when I myself rather see a No Party system, are equal gaps in attainable reality, in the near future anyway. I was voting the the message and the man. If a new party can deliver such a person, that can especially drive home the 9/11 truthers issues... good luck. I simply read through the bitching carping and complaining about everything RP was not, and can't imagine this group finding a candidate again, that can even or would even, meet them half way.

It's not my problem anymore anyway. It's up to the dancers to find their guy.

Peppa  posted on  2008-02-11   19:51:31 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#467. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#464)

RP's Israel attitude was so low, he didn't get a score

And which co-incides, serendipitously, with Ron Paul's covereage in the "American" federal media.

Well, well......

They are very of afraid of Ron Paul. Good.

wbales  posted on  2008-02-11   19:52:59 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#468. To: wbales (#465)

It's likely that Mexico might have something like this. I would be surprised if the Chinese politburo didn't score the candidates.

Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'

a vast rightwing conspirator  posted on  2008-02-11   19:53:03 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#469. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#463)

You should find the strength and the intelligence inside yourself to acknowledge your mistakes and misjudgments. The ability to learn from past mistakes is not even reserved to human nature, it's part of most sentient beings' nature.

Are you typing with both hands, or congratulating yourself again?

Peppa  posted on  2008-02-11   19:53:24 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#470. To: Peppa (#469)

See? Can't admit to your own mistakes. This is very bad. I recall that Bush was unable to name even one mistake of his. Hillary is always placing blame on others for her mistakes.

This is bad, bad, bad. Almost hopeless.

Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'

a vast rightwing conspirator  posted on  2008-02-11   19:55:19 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#471. To: Peppa (#466)

That you want to have new parties, when I myself rather see a No Party system

A joint effort of like minded shall be a party regardless. And, yes, we needed a new one. I'm already a member of it. The "No Party" party moniker would be fine with me.

They are very of afraid of Ron Paul. Good.

wbales  posted on  2008-02-11   19:57:25 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#472. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#468)

It's likely that Mexico might have something like this. I would be surprised if the Chinese politburo didn't score the candidates.

I bet you are right. But none hold the sway and influence of that shitty little pile of sand in the middle east.

It is distressing that foreign interests direct our internal politics so.

They are very of afraid of Ron Paul. Good.

wbales  posted on  2008-02-11   20:00:21 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#473. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#470)

See? Can't admit to your own mistakes. This is very bad. I recall that Bush was unable to name even one mistake of his. Hillary is always placing blame on others for her mistakes.

This is bad, bad, bad. Almost hopeless.

Show me my mistake Maha bedwetter.

Peppa  posted on  2008-02-11   20:07:49 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#474. To: wbales (#471)

A joint effort of like minded shall be a party regardless. And, yes, we needed a new one. I'm already a member of it. The "No Party" party moniker would be fine with me.

Please let me know of your progress. Love to hear it.

Peppa  posted on  2008-02-11   20:10:18 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#475. To: Peppa (#473)

Your biggest mistake is refusing to learn from your own mistakes.

Or... is it an inability? Or, rather... disability? In which case it wouldn't be a mistake. Only a limitation. A rather severe one. A VERY severe limitation but not everyone is born perfect, even though some do manage to improve themselves while others... don't or can't.

Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'

a vast rightwing conspirator  posted on  2008-02-11   20:10:36 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#476. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#475)

Your biggest mistake is refusing to learn from your own mistakes.

Or... is it an inability? Or, rather... disability? In which case it wouldn't be a mistake. Only a limitation. A rather severe one. A VERY severe limitation but not everyone is born perfect, even though some do manage to improve themselves while others... don't or can't.

You sure know me well.

I suppose you best not bother with me then. I have no intention of becoming anything like you. You're actually repulsive. But keep the ego flowing, I LOVE the entertainment.

Peppa  posted on  2008-02-11   20:14:56 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#477. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#457)

There was some score that Ha'aretz is assigning to the candidates to the US presidency, from the p.o.v. of how good they were for Israel. Obama had the lowest score of them all.

He also does not score high with the un-guested worker crowd. He's also the only candidate in either party that opposed the Iraq idiocy.

That's why so many Republicans and Independents are voting for him.

Republicans (Democrats for that matter) ....... HAD ENOUGH?

iconoclast  posted on  2008-02-11   20:24:04 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#478. To: Peppa (#476)

This is one out of the one or 2 posts from you I found to be even remotely coherent. And, yet, so completely wrong and disconnected from reality, it boggles the normal mind. All posts that followed this one were just stupid BS of the stupidest kind. Not that this one was in any way brilliant.

#187. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#182)

is 70% behind George W. Bush and George W. Bush's agenda of war, torture, outsourcing out economy, trading individual liberty for 'security', national bankruptcy via over-spending and borrowing and cancer-like growing state. If I am the only one who finds this a bit bizarre, then I beg for everybody else's pardon.

Vast, the last election proved that not to be the case.

Dems were 'swept' into power for a change. His poll numbers and those that support him reflect the ignorant and his real benefactors. All bottom feeders.

Dem poll numbers have tanked.

Congress' numbers blow.

These are for the people paying attention.

There are a large number of voters now that are not captured in true polling, as you are no doubt aware.

I think the light is brighter than you might think. I think the people are smarter than ever given credit for. And that is evident, by the smell of fear in the media.

Peppa posted on 2007-11-11 13:11:32 ET Reply Trace Private Reply

Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'

a vast rightwing conspirator  posted on  2008-02-11   21:50:36 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#479. To: iconoclast (#477)

I am in the process of educating myself on the topic. Just saw his wife on L King. She's impressive.

Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'

a vast rightwing conspirator  posted on  2008-02-11   21:52:08 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#480. To: christine (#399)

where's V

It's time.

It's too bad, but it is time. There is no other way.

Law Enforcement Against Prohibition

"There is no 'legitimate' Corporation by virtue of it's very legal definition and purpose."
-- IndieTx

"Corporation: An entity created for the legal protection of its human parasites, whose sole purpose is profit and self-perpetuation." © IndieTx

IndieTX  posted on  2008-02-12   1:05:41 ET  (1 image) Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#481. To: PnbC (#433)

At least Ron Paul's exit this early gives everyone some extra time to consider what happens next.

Yes. It allows us to begin survival preparations.

Law Enforcement Against Prohibition

"There is no 'legitimate' Corporation by virtue of it's very legal definition and purpose."
-- IndieTx

"Corporation: An entity created for the legal protection of its human parasites, whose sole purpose is profit and self-perpetuation." © IndieTx

IndieTX  posted on  2008-02-12   1:18:05 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#482. To: HOUNDDAWG (#445)

In fact, I'm probably done voting.....forever

IMO, America will not survive long enough for us to vote again after this "election."

Law Enforcement Against Prohibition

"There is no 'legitimate' Corporation by virtue of it's very legal definition and purpose."
-- IndieTx

"Corporation: An entity created for the legal protection of its human parasites, whose sole purpose is profit and self-perpetuation." © IndieTx

IndieTX  posted on  2008-02-12   1:20:22 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#483. To: wudidiz, Pinguinite (#344)

Since you are going to give yukon a piece of your mind and another one for Pinguinite maybe you could give him another one for me. Who knows, with three pieces that might get the boy up to about the level of an amoeba.

Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end.
Lord Acton

James Deffenbach  posted on  2008-02-12   7:33:16 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#484. To: christine (#399)

where's V?

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end.
Lord Acton

James Deffenbach  posted on  2008-02-12   7:57:20 ET  (1 image) Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#485. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#479)

I am in the process of educating myself on the topic. Just saw his wife on L King. She's impressive.

Quite a refreshing contrast to Hill and Bill, eh? ;-)

Republicans (Democrats for that matter) ....... HAD ENOUGH?

iconoclast  posted on  2008-02-12   8:11:34 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#486. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#478)

And that is evident, by the smell of fear in the media.

They have the herd somewhat contained but there is danger of a stampede.

angle  posted on  2008-02-12   8:27:24 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#487. To: Peppa (#478) (Edited)

Oh... I see that should have been directed to you. Quel surprise! I though VWR had a post I supported, but no, upon more careful inspection...it was yours.

Some operatives on this board, do you think?

angle  posted on  2008-02-12   8:34:33 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#488. To: angle (#487)

Some operatives on this board, do you think?

Oh yes. Many more than I thought.

Peppa  posted on  2008-02-12   9:01:50 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#489. To: angle (#487)

Perls of Peppic wisdom:

- I'd loan you a sandwich but that won't help your picnic.
- Don't you think RP knows all of which you allude? Don't you think we do? And yet you wish to perpetuate the fear to accept the status quo. Coward!~
- Give me your address, I'll send you a box of Depends.
- Small is the mind that has been shackled by poison. But I'll not help you further. Don't stretch your leash, you are allowed to bark only so much.
- Have you written to RP to tell him he needs to change parties for you yet?

These are all very cogent and unbelievably persuasive arguments. I can't say that I'm not impressed, because I am. I am impressed and I am entertained but that is nor right because I should be sad.

Could it be that RP's campaign inside the GOP collapsed the way it did because clowns and sycophants such as Dr. Pep found his effort more entertainment than a serious attempt to steer the machine of state in the right direction and, instead, steered the RP PR toward talking about 'money bombs' and hot air balloons instead of discussing RP's not so new or original ideas (there's nothing wrong about that) and instead of advising him to go after the people's vote instead of staying inside the GOP organization of mass-murdering and Zionistic boy lovers?

Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'

a vast rightwing conspirator  posted on  2008-02-12   10:50:36 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#490. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#489)

Could it be that RP's campaign ...collapsed the way it did because clowns...found his effort more entertainment than a serious attempt to steer the machine of state in the right direction ...instead of discussing RP's not so new or original ideas... (there's nothing wrong about that) and instead of advising him to go after the people's vote instead of staying inside the GOP organization of mass-murdering and Zionistic boy lovers?

Maybe. Now what?

angle  posted on  2008-02-12   17:14:04 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#491. To: angle (#490)

Now? Nothing. This battle was lost so all you can do is count the casualties and learn some lessons.

Deeds carry consequences.

Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'

a vast rightwing conspirator  posted on  2008-02-12   19:34:03 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#492. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#491)

Now? Nothing.

I'll stick with Ron Paul, then.

angle  posted on  2008-02-12   20:35:50 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#493. To: angle (#492)

I agree. The way I see it, we always knew it was a long shot to support Ron Paul. The first fact that we need to face is that we didn't sweep him to victory in the polls. The second fact we need to face is the convoluted nature of this campaign. It would not do to give up, nor would it do to underestimate the complexity of the strategies required for Ron Paul to successfully complete a reelection as a congressman while continuing to campaign for the office of president. Is there any historical precedent?

buckeye  posted on  2008-02-12   20:38:38 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#494. To: buckeye (#493)

Is there any historical precedent?

Not of this scope.

angle  posted on  2008-02-13   13:23:48 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#495. To: LACUMO, robin (#147)

Ron Paul may well be a distant memory to many former supporters come this november, but he won't to me. I will write in a vote for him as will my wife. Maybe that will help lighten any burden placed upon us when the punishment comes our way. At least we will know like Dr. Paul, we never compromised.

That whole post was worth reading.

We demand our United States Constitution be restored.

angle  posted on  2008-02-14   9:15:46 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#496. To: Cynicom (#8)

since you're one of the few who recall the relevance of this: a reminder for others. This 4 year old thread about the "TROTSKY MEMO" is quite the amusing read., particularly in retrospect. I am waiting for his 2012 verion to be released soon.

"Even to the death fight for truth, and the LORD your God will battle for you". Sirach 4:28

Artisan  posted on  2012-03-26   12:28:09 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#497. To: All, wudidiz, *Bilderberg and NWO Watch* (#496)

haha. As i pinged this thread a month & half ago & said i'm waiting for the 2012 version. There is nothing new under the sun. Ron can now enjoy those pancakes at his masonic lodge and retire. :-)

"Even to the death fight for truth, and the LORD your God will battle for you". Sirach 4:28

Artisan  posted on  2012-05-14   20:19:55 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#498. To: Artisan, Cynicom (#497)

May 15 2012

FYI:


"For my part, whatever anguish of spirit it may cost, I am willing to know the whole truth, to know the worst, and to provide for it.” ~ Patrick Henry

wudidiz  posted on  2012-05-15   6:03:08 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#499. To: Artisan (#497) (Edited)

Ron can now enjoy those pancakes at his masonic lodge

Masons have been running this country from the start. ;)

I knew two 33rd Degree Masons in Lebanon, MO. One was a judge and the other was a bondsman.

"When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one." Edmund Burke

BTP Holdings  posted on  2012-05-16   17:33:37 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#500. To: BTP Holdings (#499)

FIVE HUNNERT!!!!!!!!!!

Perseverent Gardener
"“Believe nothing merely because you have been told it. Do not believe what your teacher tells you merely out of respect for the teacher. But whatsoever, after due examination and analysis, you find to be kind, conducive to the good, the benefit, the welfare of all beings - that doctrine believe and cling to, and take it as your guide.” ~ Gautama Siddhartha — The Buddha

Original_Intent  posted on  2012-05-16   21:37:12 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#501. To: robin (#0)

911 Truth Movement

The truth about 9-11 is that those planes were flown into the twin towers by a Global Hawk. It is made by Boeing. No one knows for sure who was at the controls of that Global Hawk, but rest assured it was not anyone loyal to the United States.

"When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one." Edmund Burke

BTP Holdings  posted on  2012-05-19   11:57:57 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]