Freedom4um

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Dead Constitution
See other Dead Constitution Articles

Title: The Racial Murder and Rape of White Women in America
Source: http://www.davidduke.com
URL Source: http://www.davidduke.com/general/th ... ite-women-in-america_3555.html
Published: Mar 10, 2008
Author: Rep. David Duke
Post Date: 2008-03-10 05:26:41 by Liberate Jim Traficant
Keywords: http://www.davidduke.com, Lauren Burk, Eva Carson
Views: 1634
Comments: 33

Lauren Burk, a freshman at Auburn University and Eva Carson of UNC. Also pictured are their accused murderers.

The Racial Murder and Rape of White Women in America

How the so-called “Civil Rights” Movement in America has led to loss of the most important civil right of all: life.

The almost simultaneous murders of White co-eds at two different, prominent universities, Auburn and University of North Carolina, should bring attention to an epidemic of brutal African-American crimes against White women in the United States.

The murder of Eve Carson, Student Body President of UNC has shocked her campus and its surrounding community to its core. Ms. Carson was found murdered in the middle of an intersection just outside downtown Chapel Hill on Wednesday, March 5th. Her body ... which had two gunshot wounds, including one to the head, laid just a mile away from her SUV, which was left abandoned. Bank ATM video revealed that the murderer-carjacker, an African American, apparently attempted to get cash from Carson’s stolen ATM card shortly after the crime.

In a similar recent incident, police arrested another African American attacker, Courtney L. Lockhart, 23, for the grisly murder and attempted rape of Auburn University freshman co-ed, Lauren Burk, on March 4. Courtney was arrested on March 7 after having brutally pistol-whipped the face of another White victim, 72-year-old Marjorie Llewellyn of Newnan, Alabama and briefly kidnapping her at gunpoint during an armed robbery and attempted carjacking earlier in the day.

The recent murders of two White coeds at major universities by Black predators underscore a racial reality that the mass media in America hides from the public: the tens of millions of White victims of Black criminality in America. Over the past four decades since the “civil rights” movement, crime figures show that millions of crimes have been committed by Blacks and other non-White predators against White people. The crimes include robbery, assault, rape and murder.

The racial component of crime in America has been largely ignored. It took a major newspaper outside of America to address the shocking epidemic Black crime in America. ( See The Race War of Black Against White by Paul Sheehan from the Sydney Morning Herald)

http://www.davidduke.com/race-information-library/the-race-war-of-black-against-white_75.html

Black crime rates against White people are many times greater than White crimes against Blacks. You wouldn’t know it by reading or listening to America’s mass media. Saturation national and international news coverage is given to the very few White cross-race crimes against Blacks such as the James Byrd dragging case in Texas, as well as the media-hyped Tawana Brawley case in New Jersey and the alleged rape of a Black stripper by White lacrosse team members at Duke University. Both of those latter cases, after months of front-page, sensationalized coverage decrying “White racism,” turned out to be complete hoaxes.

There is an incredible disproportionate rate of Black crimes against Whites in contrast to White crimes against Blacks. Per capita Black cross racial crimes of 50 or even 100 percent greater than Whites would be bad enough, but the Black crime rates against Whites are actually many times greater than White on Black crimes. Blacks are an estimated 57 (that is 5,700 percent!) times more likely to commit violent crime against a white than vice versa, and 136 times (13,600 percent!) more likely to commit robbery. (see the color of crime report published by the New Century Foundation – an analysis of crime figures taken from official Justice Department crime reports) http://www.nc-f.org/

Perhaps the most shocking of all the crime data dealing with cross-race crime is the incredible rate of crime by Black males against White women. According to U.S. Justice Department figures over 34,460 White women are sexually assaulted or raped by Black men each year, and most authorities believe that the actual rape figures are at least twice the reported number. In perhaps the most shocking crime figure of all is the number of White rapes against Black women. Statistically, it is 0! Because they have fewer than 10 cases nationally.

According to murder figures released by the Justice Department in 2002, , Black predators are at least 22 times (2,200 percent) more likely to murder White women than the reverse. In regard to gang attacks including the horrible specter of gang rape, the figures are literally off the charts, with at least a 200 times (that’s 20,000 percent!) greater chance of Blacks committing gang assaults and that includes both White men and women victims!

The staggering personal tragedies connected with these huge crime numbers should be a national scandal. Yet, the facts go largely unreported. How many times have the public seen media portrayals of historical or contemporary racial discrimination against Black people. But, the question is, “In the terms of the most important of human rights, how does the discrimination of racially segregated water fountains or neighborhoods or schools compare with the racially born crimes of black slaughter and physical attacks levied against thousands of White people each year?

America has been treated to thousands of media articles for instance about the frontier-style vigilante justice of lynchings, events which have occurred at least since the time of the American Revolution when they began on the Virginia frontier. Lynching got its name from Colonel Charles Lynch of Bedford County. He defended his community against outlaws and against Tories who were treacherously aiding the British. The Lynch organizations not only captured suspicious characters but gave them trials. With the frontier moving west and often with not a single law enforcement officer for hundreds of miles, vigilante committees often hunted down criminals and meted out punishment which was called “lynching.”

Lynching also became prominent again in the face of terrible outrages against innocent women and children during the Black Reconstruction period in the South and was mostly employed there against suspected Black rapists and murderers, but lynching was often practiced against Whites in the South, and quite often against criminal Whites in the North and West.

Of course, everyone today naturally condemns the practice of lynching, as well they should. Mob violence cannot be defended. But, if one wants to characterize lynching as a racial crime because lynchings were more commonly employed against Blacks in the South than against Whites, a few facts must be taken into account. If one considers disproportionate rates of Black lynching in the South, one must also consider the Black disproportionate crime rate.

1) Many scholars who have studied the history of lynching in the United States make it clear that lynching wasn’t simply a racial crime, but one primarily exacted on criminals whether they were Black or White. Consider the fact that even today, Blacks commit more murders than Whites in the United States, and Blacks are many times more likely to commit interracial race crimes such as rape and murder. As pointed out by federal crimes studies, a Black man is 57 times more likely to commit a violent crime against Whites than vice-versa, thousands of times more likely to rape a White women than Whites are likely to rape Black women, and 22 times more likely to murder a White woman than vice versa. There is no reason not to suspect that similar extremely high rates of Black criminality have existed historically. Most of the lynchings up until the War Between the States were against Whites and Significant numbers of Whites in the late 19th and early 20th Century were also lynched. So, considering the rates of crime, historical lynching has always been proportionate to Black crime rates and not one simply based on racist motives.

2) One must also understand that historical lynching was most often applied to those guilty of rape, robbery or murder. Of course, there were cases where innocent men were lynched, but in contrast, the thousands of White women and other White victims of Black crime today are guilty of no crime. Lynching cannot be excused in any way, but most of those men lynched were undoubtedly guilty of vicious and horrible crimes against the innocent, especially against women and children. Those were the kinds of heinous crimes that really drove the extra-legal executions.

The U.S. Senate recently issued an apology for not historically taking a stand against lynching, something that has been condemned because for part of its history Blacks disproportionately suffered from it.

If that is deemed appropriate, why does the U.S. Senate stand mute against the brutal rape of over 34,000 White women per year by Blacks. In just one year the number of White women raped by Black males is 6 times the total number of all lynchings during the entire history of the United States. (Estimated to be about 5,000 including both Whites and Blacks)

If racial disparity is an issue, then the Black rate of murder and rape against White men and women has a far greater racial disparity than that of White and Black lynchings. Remember, according to the U.S. Justice Department official figures, 34,000 White women were sexually assaulted compared to less than ten Black women assaulted by White men.

One should also consider that the victims of lynching were men; only a small number were women (estimates are between 75 and 100 women lynched in the history of the United States), and most of those were lynched for crimes committed along with their male criminal partners. Compare the small number of women who suffered lynching compared to the 34,000 women who suffer from Black rape every year. In addition, 700 innocent White women are murdered each and every year by Blacks. Where is the outrage about this racial crime?

If one wants to talk about moral outrages, the historical lynching of men who were overwhelmingly criminal and guilty of horrendous crimes, is quite minor compared to the mass murder and rape of the innocent going on literally as you read these lines. While you are reading this article another White woman will suffer rape at the hands of a Black man. (One White woman every 9 minutes if you accept the conventional wisdom that less than half of rapes are reported).

Next time someone comes up and tells you about the horrors of Jim Crow and segregation, how it was so terribly awful that African Americans, as well as White Americans lived in their own neighborhoods, went to their own schools, and even drank from their own water fountains, think about that supposed horror compared to horrendous violations of the most important civil right of all, the right to live and not suffer grievous personal assault or even death.

The fact of the matter is that Blacks as well as the Whites of America were a lot safer in the days of “evil segregation” than we are now. When America was a nation living by the values of White heritage, culture, standards and civilization, most Black kids were born legitimate in two parent families, they were not being shot down by each other on the steps of their homes, millions were not enslaved by drugs, half of them were not in prison or in some part of the criminal justice system. In a real sense, for countless millions of African Americans, the most important civil and human rights of all have been lost by the so-called victories of the civil rights movement.

For Whites the change has been just as dramatic. Millions of our people are now victims of Black robbery, rape, and murder. Millions of White boys and girls whose parents can’t afford private or parochial education, suffer in mostly Black public schools filled with sexual and physical intimidation, filthy language and dismal standards, drugs and the violence of the “gangsta rap” culture, a culture that violates the sanctity of womanhood and all of the most basic of human rights.

Millions more of our elderly are practically home prisoners in their own neighborhoods. Let the media and government tell them about the supposed civil rights and blessings of forced integration. Millions more of hardworking, better-qualified White, middle-class people suffer from the racial discrimination of so-called affirmative action. Constant government and media concern about “civil rights” is the greatest con job in history, because so-called civil rights has taken away practically every conceivable civil right of the American people, including the most important one of all, the right to live and the right not to be physically abused, or raped, or robbed or hurt.

Let the government and media drone on about Black “civil rights” to the grieving parents of Eve Carson and Lauren Burk, two bright and beautiful White women who were so full of love and life but who now have lost the most precious civil right of all, the right to life itself.

They were murdered not just by the predators on our streets, but by a media and government establishment who stripped away their right to live a safe and full life. They were murdered by media who have lied to the American people about the joys of multiracialism and multiculturalism. It is a media that constantly tell us the wonderful and loving future we have in America as it is subversively morphed into a mostly non-White nation. It is the same media who have instilled collective White guilt for real or imagined crimes of White history, but have hidden the terrible crimes going on against us, our heritage, freedom and survival, right before our eyes.

Lauren and Eva were murdered by the politicians who sold us out for the bloc votes and for the approval of media that celebrates the coming extinction of our people, faith, heritage and nation. They have also sold their souls and ours to the Jewish money men of American politics who make them pledge their subservience to Israel as a quote, “Jewish State for the Jewish people,” while they would not even dare to invoke the term “White people” except in denigration and apology.

Eva and Lauren no longer have breath in their bodies. To the last moments of their lives they probably never for an instant understood why they lost their lives. They probably never knew that our people were in a desperate struggle for their existence, and they probably never dreamed they could be a casualty in that war.

Eva and Lauren are gone now. They cannot speak to us except by what they left behind. But, they cannot be forgotten. We who are aware of the crisis facing our people will remember them. We will remember them as they were, beautiful expressions of humanity made unique and special by their own efforts and by the imprint of our people’s DNA spiral.

All of us at davidduke.com are dedicated to the preservation of what they were, and what they are, in us.

For, in the end, the most important civil right of all, is life.

David Duke

Spoken MP3




(2 images)

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: All (#0)

Two young female students shot and killed last week...

Apparently unrelated cases... very sad:


More Doc Duke on these appalling black attacks on White women
http://www.stormfront.org/forum/showthread.php? t=467802

Youtube of Eva Carson as UNC Student Body President cut down way before her time -
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5s0JT...d.php? p=739789

Liberate Jim Traficant  posted on  2008-03-10   5:34:02 ET  (1 image) Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Liberate Jim Traficant (#0) (Edited)

The Race War of Black Against White

Photobucket
If I ever have a son, I'm gonna name him Creepy Creedy!

HOUNDDAWG  posted on  2008-03-10   5:48:44 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: Liberate Jim Traficant (#1) (Edited)

Accused Killer's Mom 'Sorry' For Auburn Murder

"COLUMBUS, Ga. -- The mother of the man charged with killing an Auburn University student said her son was an Iraq war veteran who was changed after his service, and offered an apology to the freshman's family.

Catherine Williams, the mother of suspect Courtney Lockhart, made the apology to Lauren Burk's family in an interview with Columbus, Ga., television station WTVM.

"I am sorry that Courtney did that. ... First let me say I'm sorry to the Burk family for Courtney taking, taking their child. ... My heart goes out to her family," Williams said in the tearful interview.

But she also said her son did not confess anything to her.

Lockhart, 23, was arrested Friday in Phenix City, Ala., and was charged with capital murder in Burk's abduction and shooting death. Police would not say what led them to charge him in her death.

The 18-year-old from Marietta, Ga., was found shot on the side of an off-campus road Tuesday night and her car was found burning in a campus parking lot.

Williams told the television station that her son hasn't been the same after serving 16 months in Iraq. She says her son had been living with her in Smiths Station, Ala., since returning from the war.

The Burk family likely did not see the Saturday evening TV interview, family spokeswoman Kathy Singleton said.

"The family didn't watch any TV last night. I honestly don't know what their reaction is," Singleton said. "My heart breaks for anyone that's attached to the whole tragic situation. It's hard on everyone."

One number for Catherine Williams in Smiths Station was unlisted. No one immediately returned a message Sunday from The Associated Press at another listing for Cathy Williams in the same town."

________________________

Don't be surprised if his Mammy's singing a different tune when this goes to trial. And, try not to be too horrified if a mostly black jury (which is a real likelihood in the greater Atlanta area, or anywhere in GA) exonerates him.

Photobucket
If I ever have a son, I'm gonna name him Creepy Creedy!

HOUNDDAWG  posted on  2008-03-10   6:16:23 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: Liberate Jim Traficant (#0)

I think some of this has to do with envy. These are ugly men who would never get women who look like this.

I know a woman who is half white and half black. She is what used to be called "high yellow" and is clearly mixed.

She told me only black men are vicious to her. They see that yellow skin and can't stand it, knowing she would have nothing to do with them. Which is true. She has a baby by a white man, a little girl who passes completely for whit.

This problem with the rape and murder cannot be fixed except by the removal of these people from society.

When seconds count, the police are only minutes away.

YertleTurtle  posted on  2008-03-10   6:52:00 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: Liberate Jim Traficant (#0)

Black crime rates against White people are many times greater than White crimes against Blacks

Although this comment is demonstrably true, it is racist simply to mention it. Facts like this hurt the heads of white liberals as they try to spin the concept of reverse racism (these crimes would be hate crimes if the colors of the actors were reversed).

Jethro Tull  posted on  2008-03-10   6:57:40 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: Jethro Tull (#5) (Edited)

(these crimes would be hate crimes if the colors of the actors were reversed).

JT,

Do you remember when Yankel Rosenbaum was murdered in Crown Heights in 1991? Well, guess what? The third trial (the second for violating Rosenbaum's civil rights) is still waiting to commence almost 17 years after the murder!

Although the-then 16 yr old defendant was cleared of murder by a state jury, he was convicted by the feds and received a 19 1/2 yr sentence for violating Rosenbaum's civil rights, and that was overturned and the case was refiled.

Although a 44 yr old black named Charles Price was also convicted for inciting the rioters to "get Jews" his conviction stuck because "it was done all nice and legal like." But, it remains to be seen if a non white can be convicted of a civil rights crime for murdering someone. The Wikipedia page has lots of warm and fuzzy stuff about how quickly the two communities became friendly and even play basketball together. There's no mention that the effort to convict one black is still ongoing, or that the city agreed to a 1.25 mil settlement to the Rosenbaum family in 2005.

Because Lauren Burk's memorial service was held in a reformed Jewish synagogue I assume that she is Jewish. And, because of the special circumstances, (murder in the course of a kidnapping and attempted rape) the defendant should be sentenced to death upon conviction. If justice is found wanting in her murder then this case could be in the courts for a long time.

Although the other young woman's murder was equally tragic, it is my belief that there is little chance of federal intervention regardless of the disposition. Because as you pointed out non whites aren't charged with hate crimes when the victims are white, the murder of Yankel Rosenbaum was a special case for reasons which you could probably explain better than me.

Photobucket
If I ever have a son, I'm gonna name him Creepy Creedy!

HOUNDDAWG  posted on  2008-03-10   9:00:52 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: Liberate Jim Traficant (#0)

Perhaps the most shocking of all the crime data dealing with cross-race crime is the incredible rate of crime by Black males against White women. According to U.S. Justice Department figures over 34,460 White women are sexually assaulted or raped by Black men each year, and most authorities believe that the actual rape figures are at least twice the reported number. In perhaps the most shocking crime figure of all is the number of White rapes against Black women. Statistically, it is 0! Because they have fewer than 10 cases nationally.

and yet white men and women are not allowed DEFENSIVE RACISM which means assuring one's SAFETY and SURVIVAL in many instances.

christine  posted on  2008-03-10   10:04:34 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: HOUNDDAWG, Liberate Jim Traficant, Jethro Tull, *Ron Paul for President 2008* (#2)

This article is spot on accurate. And, it is concurrently one of the most "politically incorrect" statements ever made per the establishment definition of "political correctness".

We, the sheeple, are not supposed to be making these comments--making these obvious observations.

Here is another and related one: for the last 20 years there has been an overt, blatant agenda in the government, print media, hollywood, educational institutions, et. al., to push interracial couples, and in particular, black male/white female, upon American society and culture. Only a blind person would not have noticed this. And regardless of one's position of inter-racial relationships, this agenda cannot be denied.

I shall not vote for evil, lesser or otherwise.

wbales  posted on  2008-03-10   10:17:03 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: wbales, HOUNDDAWG, Jethro Tull, Cynicom (#8)

From USDOJ:

Although slightly less true now than before, most murders are intraracial

From 1976 to 2005 --

  • 86% of white victims were killed by whites

  • 94% of black victims were killed by blacks

To view data, click on the chart.

Race of
Offender and Victim[D]

Stranger homicides are more likely to cross racial lines than those that involve friends or acquaintances

For homicides committed by --

  • a friend or acquaintance of the victim, less than one-tenth (8%) were interracial
  • a stranger to the victim, one-quarter were interracial

To view data, click on the chart.

Race of
Offender and Victim by relationship[D]

'He will make Cheney look like Gandhi.'
U.S. conservative pundit Pat Buchanan, imagining presidential hopeful John McCain in the White House.

robin  posted on  2008-03-10   10:38:51 ET  (2 images) Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: Liberate Jim Traficant (#0)

Blacks are an estimated 57 (that is 5,700 percent!) times more likely to commit violent crime against a white than vice versa, and 136 times (13,600 percent!) more likely to commit robbery.

Remind me, at what grade level are percentages taught again?

THE YEAR WAS 2081, and everybody was finally equal. They weren’t only equal before God and the law. They were equal every which way. Nobody was smarter than anybody else. Nobody was better looking than anybody else. Nobody was stronger or quicker than anybody else. All this equality was due to the 211th, 212th, and 213th Amendments to the Constitution, and to the unceasing vigilance of agents of the United States Handicapper General.

Some things about living still weren’t quite right, though.

Tauzero  posted on  2008-03-10   11:08:11 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: robin (#9)

So, given that additional information, you should have sufficient information to make a fair guess at the answer to the following questions:

What percentage of stranger murders are committed by blacks?

What are the black and white stranger murder rates?

That is, if you dare to ask them.

THE YEAR WAS 2081, and everybody was finally equal. They weren’t only equal before God and the law. They were equal every which way. Nobody was smarter than anybody else. Nobody was better looking than anybody else. Nobody was stronger or quicker than anybody else. All this equality was due to the 211th, 212th, and 213th Amendments to the Constitution, and to the unceasing vigilance of agents of the United States Handicapper General.

Some things about living still weren’t quite right, though.

Tauzero  posted on  2008-03-10   11:23:26 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: robin, wbales. HOUNDDAWG, cynicom, all (#9)

Robin; the charts discuss homicide, but omit murder and manslaughter. They are three distinct crimes.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2008-03-10   11:27:38 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: Tauzero (#11)

Bump to #12.

GMTA.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2008-03-10   11:28:39 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: Jethro Tull (#13)

Everybody's a critic.

THE YEAR WAS 2081, and everybody was finally equal. They weren’t only equal before God and the law. They were equal every which way. Nobody was smarter than anybody else. Nobody was better looking than anybody else. Nobody was stronger or quicker than anybody else. All this equality was due to the 211th, 212th, and 213th Amendments to the Constitution, and to the unceasing vigilance of agents of the United States Handicapper General.

Some things about living still weren’t quite right, though.

Tauzero  posted on  2008-03-10   11:37:09 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: Tauzero (#11)

There are far more whites in this country than blacks. And there are more whites with something to steal than blacks.

So a criminal might very well be predisposed to finding white victims.

Even still according to USDOJ:

From 1976 to 2005 --

* 86% of white victims were killed by whites

* 94% of black victims were killed by blacks

--------------------------------------

Furthermore, college campuses have young women, some with nice cars, who are away from home for the first time. They are not aware of the dangers (they may think they are), and take chances that they were free to take when they lived at home.

Just like a pedophile seeks out day care centers, a rapist would seek out a college campus.

'He will make Cheney look like Gandhi.'
U.S. conservative pundit Pat Buchanan, imagining presidential hopeful John McCain in the White House.

robin  posted on  2008-03-10   11:55:42 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: Jethro Tull (#12)

They have stats on all crimes at that USDOJ website. There is some slight variance but not a lot.

'He will make Cheney look like Gandhi.'
U.S. conservative pundit Pat Buchanan, imagining presidential hopeful John McCain in the White House.

robin  posted on  2008-03-10   11:56:53 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#17. To: Jethro Tull (#13)

Just another report from the Rainbow Nation.....Africas past Americas future?

Disgraceful justice for rape victims

No one who has been raped will ever be quite the same again. After the physical violation comes a long battle with fear, guilt, shame, depression and anger.

Many people who have been raped also face the compound trauma of HIV or an unwanted pregnancy. Young children’s bodies can be so badly damaged that they may never bear their own children.

In South Africa, it is estimated that at least 500000 women and children are forced every year to have unwanted sexual intercourse with cruel and sadistic men who treat them as objects to be abused and discarded. This places a terrible emotional burden on our nation.

www.thetimes.co.za/PrintE...ht/Article.aspx?id=722919

Survivor plans to help other women

Refusing to be a victim, a strong and resolute young Durban woman who was robbed, repeatedly raped and left in a ditch has decided to tell her story to raise awareness of rape.

Jessica Foord, 21, of Kloof, said she was relieved to hear that five men had been arrested for Sunday's rape and robbery.

"My family and I would like to thank the private investigator who worked on the case. Now I want justice and to create as much awareness (about rape) as I can," she said.

www.int.iol.co.za/index.p...n20080306052642742C502807

Public to raise voices against rape accused

The five suspects who allegedly gang-raped a 21-year-old woman in front of her father in Shongweni on Sunday afternoon are expected to appear in the Pinetown Magistrate's Court tomorrow.

The entire Outer West community are outraged by the incident and intend making their presence felt at the suspects' appearance.

Police and members of the community traced two of the suspects to Inanda Dam on Tuesday night, and the other three suspects were arrested on Wednesday in the Shongweni Valley.

www.int.iol.co.za/index.php

Police raped us - street kids

Street children living near Albert Park allege that two of the girls who have been living on the perimeter of the park were raped by members of the Durban Metro Police - and one of them is now missing.

According to careworker Sipho Nyaka, whose NGO, World Back to God, helps look after street children, he has seen police officers arresting street children and found girls stripped naked and handcuffed on more than one occasion.

Nyaka said one of the girls who alleged she had been raped by a Metro policeman after being arrested was missing.

www.int.iol.co.za/index.p...n20080308083459185C765631

robnoel  posted on  2008-03-10   11:59:23 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: Liberate Jim Traficant (#0)

Lauren and Eva were murdered by the politicians who sold us out for the bloc votes and for the approval of media that celebrates the coming extinction of our people, faith, heritage and nation. They have also sold their souls and ours to the Jewish money men of American politics who make them pledge their subservience to Israel as a quote, “Jewish State for the Jewish people,” while they would not even dare to invoke the term “White people” except in denigration and apology.

He always makes a lot of sense for a guy who is supposed to be crazed.

Funny that.

"Satan / Cheney in "08" Just Foreign Policy Iraqi Death Estimator

tom007  posted on  2008-03-10   12:12:39 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: robin (#16)

If these girls were black, and the perps white, the racial double standard would be screaming in the streets as I type.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2008-03-10   12:33:38 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#20. To: HOUNDDAWG, all (#6)

Do you remember when Yankel Rosenbaum was murdered in Crown Heights in 1991?

I know the incident and the neighborhood like the back of my hand. Here's a little known black on white crime connected to that incident, but once again it wasn't classified as a hate crime.

D'Amato: Justice Department To Open Court Files On Graziosi Murder


Italian Voice, The

03-03-1994

D'Amato: Justice Department To Open Court Files On Graziosi Murder:. Critical step in probe of death linked to Crown Heights Riot

WASHINGTON -- U.S. Sen. Alfonse D'Amato (R-NY) has announced that the Justice department ordered the unsealing of court records in the trial of a man accused of murdering Anthony Graziosi. The action is part of an on-going probe to investigate possible civil rights violations connected to the Maspeth, Queens, man's death.

"I am pleased to see that the justice Department has moved forward with my request to investigate the circumstances surrounding the brutal murder of Anthony Graziosi. it is clear to me that this man, an Italian-American, was murdered as an outgrowth of the attacks undertaken two weeks earlier against the Jewish community in Crown Heights. Mr. Graziosi was killed simply because he looked like an Orthodox Jew," said D'Amato.

According to D'Amato, the Justice Department last week issued an unsealing order to release the court records of the trial of Carl Daniels, who in June 1992, was tried and acquitted in Graziosi's murder. The Justice Department will investigate these records to determine if a bias crime had occurred that resulted in a violation of Graziosi's civil rights.

Sen. D'Amato first called for a Justice Department probe into Graziosi's murder in a letter to Attorney General Janet Reno on March 16, 1993. The Senator was informed on April 30, 1993 that the FBI would proceed with an investigation.

In his March 16 letter, D'Amato described the circumstances surrounding the Graziosi murder, including the fact that Graziosi was not robbed (although his car was loaded with electronic merchandise and his wallet with $150 was found on his person) and his personal appearance (dark jacket and heavy beard) at the time of his death indicated that he was killed because he was mistaken for a Jew.

"Anthony Graziosi was viciously shot in his car and then gunned down in the street as he tried to escape a raging mob in Crown Heights. Anthony Graziosi's death resulted because mob violence was left unchecked in August of 1991. Just as we seek justice in the murder of Yankel Rosenbaum, so we must vigilantly pursue justice for Anthony Graziosi," D'Amato said.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2008-03-10   12:44:06 ET  (1 image) Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#21. To: robnoel (#17)

Disturbing stuff, Robby. S. Africa is exhibit "A" in the case against elevating a communist (Mandela) to icon status.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2008-03-10   12:49:09 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#22. To: robin, TwentyTwelve, christine, Wudidiz, Peppa, Indie Tx, Pinguinite, tom007, all (#9)

Just looking at the numbers does not tell us WHY?

Knowing the correct "why" allows you to solve the problem.

I am not saying I know the correct "why" what I am saying is that there is one.

The black on white graph starts going up in 1975 and so that tells us that something changed prior to that increase.

What is continuing to instigate, and increase, black rage against whites?

Something is being done by someone(s) to cause that increase whether knowingly or not knowingly. I suspect, but cannot prove, that there is a psychologist/psychiatrist originated program at work to increase divisions in the society to divide and conquer.

Wherever you see psychological manipulation at play, whether subtle or not, you can always find a psychologist/psychiatrist at the base - usually operating through an intelligence agency.

Dr. Duke is right to observe the problem but inevitably posits an incorrect "why". That we can know it is incorrect is that it has not resulted in a viable solution.

So, the question remains: What is the correct "why"?

"The difference between an honorable man and a moral man is that an honorable man regrets a discreditable act even when it has worked and he is in no danger of being caught." ~ H. L. Mencken

Original_Intent  posted on  2008-03-10   14:56:55 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#23. To: Original_Intent (#22)

So, the question remains: What is the correct "why"?

Multi-tiered chessboard I think OI.

I am pulling from memory but I would like to review when Agenda 21 was essentially formed and formalized. Review the movers and shakers of various foundations such as Ford and Carnegie.

This is only a part of the whole affecting the US, border nations and global immigration policies whose undercurrent was diversity, tolerance, and balkinization. And of course the necessary 'change agents' deployed to move it forward on the ground and in the courts.

""The evils we experience flow from the excess of democracy. The people do not want virtue, but are the dupes of pretended patriots." -- Elbridge Gerry (1744-1814) of Massachusetts, Signer of the Declaration of Independence and Member of the Constitutional Convention Source: Speech in the Constitutional Convention, 1787.

Peppa  posted on  2008-03-10   17:30:11 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#24. To: Liberate Jim Traficant, Original_Intent, TwentyTwelve, robin, Uncle Bill, FormerLurker, James Deffenbach, christine, _______, ALL (#0)

The first thing that comes to mind is:

Innocent until proven guilty.

Second is:

Cut their dicks off if they're guilty.


“The individual is handicapped by coming face-to-face with a conspiracy so monstrous he cannot believe it exists.” ~ J. Edgar Hoover

wudidiz  posted on  2008-03-10   18:53:56 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#25. To: All (#24)

Third is:

WTF does race have to do with it?

I doubt the victims really care what the race of the perpetrators is.


“The individual is handicapped by coming face-to-face with a conspiracy so monstrous he cannot believe it exists.” ~ J. Edgar Hoover

wudidiz  posted on  2008-03-10   18:57:33 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#26. To: robin, Jethro Tull (#9) (Edited)

Did you happen to notice that there is no mention of Hispanics on your graphs?

Now, this could be for at least two reasons:

A) Hispanics commit so few crimes as to be statistically insignificant.

B) Hispanics are classified as whites for the purposes of crimes they commit.

(but they may be classified as non white/Hispanic if they are the victims of "hate crimes")

The correct answer is B.

So, if there is no way of analyzing how many Mexicans/El Salvadorans/Colombians/Puerto Ricans/Santo Domingans/Cubans and other browns victimized European Caucasians because they're all classified as white, then I respectfully submit that your graph is being used the way a drunkard uses a lamp post-for support rather than illumination. Why? Because the obvious truth is simply not there.

Obviously, blue-eyed Spanish Europeans (from Spain) should be classified as white. But, classifying Mestizos as white because they speak Spanish makes as much sense as classifying Filipinos as white because of their Spanish surnames (Corazon Aquino, Ferdinand & Imelda Marcos) resulting from 16th century Spanish colonialism.

The fact is, political correctness (or undue influence) precludes accurate classification of browns, just as the category of "Jewish mafya" was eliminated under Louis Freeh with instructions to list them as "Russians". This skewing of accurate crime stats serves some purpose other than truth.

Photobucket
If I ever have a son, I'm gonna name him Creepy Creedy!

HOUNDDAWG  posted on  2008-03-10   20:10:14 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#27. To: HOUNDDAWG (#26)

I noticed that, and came to the same conclusion. There are other stats for illegals, but I'm not sure if there is one just for latinos.

'He will make Cheney look like Gandhi.'
U.S. conservative pundit Pat Buchanan, imagining presidential hopeful John McCain in the White House.

robin  posted on  2008-03-10   20:12:38 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#28. To: HOUNDDAWG (#26)

'dawg. If anyone is truly interested in the question of who is committing crime in America, just take a look at any prison courtyard during rec. hour. The answer it right there in living high color.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2008-03-10   20:43:02 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#29. To: Jethro Tull (#28)

'dawg. If anyone is truly interested in the question of who is committing crime in America, just take a look at any prison courtyard during rec. hour. The answer it right there in living high color.

My nephew is a prison guard in upstate New York. Ninety per cent of the scum are from "NEW YORK CITY" AND THEIR RACE IS APPARENT.

Cynicom  posted on  2008-03-10   20:52:52 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#30. To: Jethro Tull (#20)

I completely forgot about the murder of Anthony Graziosi, and so has Justice, I see.

Footnote: The Sullivan Law must have been very reassuring to the murdering rioters.

Without it there could have been GUNS in proximity to the panicked victims and someone may have gotten hurt.

Photobucket
If I ever have a son, I'm gonna name him Creepy Creedy!

HOUNDDAWG  posted on  2008-03-10   20:57:24 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#31. To: HOUNDDAWG (#30)

The Sullivan Law is every bit as viable to our safety as gun free zones. Urp.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2008-03-10   21:14:55 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#32. To: Jethro Tull, robin, ghostdogtxn (#28)

'dawg. If anyone is truly interested in the question of who is committing crime in America, just take a look at any prison courtyard during rec. hour. The answer it right there in living high color.

Well, ghostdogtxn and robin and I have engaged on this issue in the past, and it's been well covered. So, I'll leave it alone for now!PhotobucketPhotobucketPhotobucket

Photobucket
If I ever have a son, I'm gonna name him Creepy Creedy!

HOUNDDAWG  posted on  2008-03-10   21:35:50 ET  (3 images) Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#33. To: HOUNDDAWG (#32)

"It does not take a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brush fires of freedom in the minds of men." -- Samuel Adams (1722-1803)‡

ghostdogtxn  posted on  2008-03-11   9:18:16 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest