Freedom4um

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Ron Paul
See other Ron Paul Articles

Title: Why Did Ron Paul Give Up on the LP?
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://www.nolanchart.com/article384.html
Published: Dec 6, 2007
Author: Christine Smith
Post Date: 2008-03-12 15:55:21 by Peppa
Keywords: RonPaul, ChristineSmith
Views: 136
Comments: 14

Why Did Ron Paul Give Up on the LP?


Why did Ron Paul leave the LP as a means to advance liberty as a candidate? I'm asking this of myself over and over. Is the reason because he saw the LP as a futile path? A waste of his time and energy? No place for an individual who really wants to be part of achieving liberty in America now?
by Christine Smith (Libertarian)

Why Did Ron Paul Give Up on the LP?

A message from Christine Smith, December 6th, 2007

Why did Ron Paul leave the LP as a means to advance liberty as a candidate? I'm asking this of myself over and over. Is the reason because he saw the LP as a futile path? A waste of his time and energy? No place for an individual who really wants to be part of achieving liberty in America now? For myself, as someone who is devoted to advancing liberty and sharing libertarianism, I am having serious doubts as to whether the LP deserves individuals willing to give of themselves so selflessly. Perhaps Ron Paul's experiences brought him to such a point and decision. I know my experiences with the LP are pointing that way.

Every several days, it seems I learn of yet another individual I respect who has left the LP, and always for reasons I now more completely understand than ever before.

They are individuals who achieve progress in advocating liberty. They are the truest libertarians I have ever met. And they left the LP.

These are all individuals who tried to make a difference within the LP and finally made the decision that the LP was unworthy of their continued support and participation, that the LP did not deserve what they offered to give, that they could accomplish much more good work for liberty outside the LP rather than within it (and they've done it!).

I am at a point where I am seriously questioning whether the LP is a political party to take seriously at all or is it primarily a place for those who merely sit around and talk and argue but never actually do anything of substance? Is it a place where winners (those who actually work hard to achieve progress and success in advancing liberty in our nation) find themselves surrounded by losers (those whose priority is not liberty but who use the cause of liberty for other agendas)?

I have been reluctant to follow that line of thinking until now.

Because now, the more experiences I have, the more I wonder if all those who left the party are right.

I know it was the right choice for themselves because I see them joyfully doing good work which makes a difference, and now I also am thinking that maybe they are right about the utter failure of the LP as a means to make meaningful progress toward liberty...maybe it is a waste of one's time.

Since writing 'I Will Not Compromise - An Open Letter to libertarians,' I have obviously become even more discouraged, and even more disillusioned about the LP.

I am yet undecided, and though I yet am making a conscious choice to believe there is yet hope and yet a possibility that the LP may be a viable vehicle to advance liberty, I am uncertain. I am discouraged. I am wondering...and I am watching. Meanwhile, my appreciation goes to Ron Paul (and his supporters) for doing more to advance liberty in this nation than anyone has ever done in the political arena before.

Christine Smith Libertarian Candidate for President http://www.LibertarianForPresident.com Christine Smith for President 15400 W. 64th Ave., E9-105 Arvada, Colorado 80007 (303) 731-5879 PAID FOR BY CHRISTINE SMITH FOR PRESIDENT

Click for Full Text!

Click for Full Text!


Poster Comment:

Older but interesting. The comments at the link are truly worth a read as well.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 3.

#1. To: Peppa (#0)

Why did Ron Paul leave the LP as a means to advance liberty as a candidate?

Because he saw that liberty loving U.S. citizens are a small minority of the population and a shrinking segment at that. Also, Dr. Paul is just about a lone voice crying out in the wilderness among inept (read corrupt/cowardly) politicians.

Well - at least that's what I saw from my vantage point.

catcher  posted on  2008-03-12   16:32:27 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: catcher (#1)

Because he saw that liberty loving U.S. citizens are a small minority of the population and a shrinking segment at that. Also, Dr. Paul is just about a lone voice crying out in the wilderness among inept (read corrupt/cowardly) politicians.

Well - at least that's what I saw from my vantage point.

Thanks catcher.

I think we can attribute much to gov't schools as well. Too much to list to explain how we got here. Lulled into comfort, and cowed into silence.

Peppa  posted on  2008-03-12   21:24:17 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: Peppa (#2)

(snip) Too much to list to explain how we got here. Lulled into comfort, and cowed into silence.

Yes, it is too much to completely explain, but it can be summed up with the point that our citizens have allowed ourselves to be placed under a complicated form of socialism where we are compelled to pay for an unbelievable array of services where corporations and government entities hold a monopoly on the price and laws concerning said services.

The end result is that personal responsibility has just about been eliminated as a trait of the citizens.

The Ron Paul campaign was attractive to the few citizens we have that love liberty and hate the nanny state.

catcher  posted on  2008-03-13   11:41:30 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 3.

#5. To: catcher (#3)

Yes, it is too much to completely explain, but it can be summed up with the point that our citizens have allowed ourselves to be placed under a complicated form of socialism where we are compelled to pay for an unbelievable array of services where corporations and government entities hold a monopoly on the price and laws concerning said services.

The end result is that personal responsibility has just about been eliminated as a trait of the citizens.

The Ron Paul campaign was attractive to the few citizens we have that love liberty and hate the nanny state.

Agreed. Change is uncomfortable. Most rather be victims of it and bitch. There are no bailouts coming for the masses.

Peppa  posted on  2008-03-13 11:52:58 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 3.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest