See other Dead Constitution Articles
Title: Predatory Lenders' Partner in Crime (ELIOT SPITZER ON BUSH ADMINISTRATION'S COMPLICITY IN SUBPRIME CRISIS)
Source:
Washington Post
URL Source: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dy ... 008021302783.html?nav=hcmodule
Published: Feb 14, 2008
Author: Gov. Eliot Spitzer
Post Date: 2008-03-14 17:32:09 by aristeides
Keywords: None
Views: 2100
Comments: 13
Predatory Lenders' Partner in Crime How the Bush Administration Stopped the States From Stepping In to Help Consumers By Eliot Spitzer Several years ago, state attorneys general and others involved in consumer protection began to notice a marked increase in a range of predatory lending practices by mortgage lenders. Some were misrepresenting the terms of loans, making loans without regard to consumers' ability to repay, making loans with deceptive "teaser" rates that later ballooned astronomically, packing loans with undisclosed charges and fees, or even paying illegal kickbacks. These and other practices, we noticed, were having a devastating effect on home buyers. In addition, the widespread nature of these practices, if left unchecked, threatened our financial markets. Even though predatory lending was becoming a national problem, the Bush administration looked the other way and did nothing to protect American homeowners. In fact, the government chose instead to align itself with the banks that were victimizing consumers. Predatory lending was widely understood to present a looming national crisis. This threat was so clear that as New York attorney general, I joined with colleagues in the other 49 states in attempting to fill the void left by the federal government. Individually, and together, state attorneys general of both parties brought litigation or entered into settlements with many subprime lenders that were engaged in predatory lending practices. Several state legislatures, including New York's, enacted laws aimed at curbing such practices. What did the Bush administration do in response? Did it reverse course and decide to take action to halt this burgeoning scourge? As Americans are now painfully aware, with hundreds of thousands of homeowners facing foreclosure and our markets reeling, the answer is a resounding no. Not only did the Bush administration do nothing to protect consumers, it embarked on an aggressive and unprecedented campaign to prevent states from protecting their residents from the very problems to which the federal government was turning a blind eye. Let me explain: The administration accomplished this feat through an obscure federal agency called the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC). The OCC has been in existence since the Civil War. Its mission is to ensure the fiscal soundness of national banks. For 140 years, the OCC examined the books of national banks to make sure they were balanced, an important but uncontroversial function. But a few years ago, for the first time in its history, the OCC was used as a tool against consumers. In 2003, during the height of the predatory lending crisis, the OCC invoked a clause from the 1863 National Bank Act to issue formal opinions preempting all state predatory lending laws, thereby rendering them inoperative. The OCC also promulgated new rules that prevented states from enforcing any of their own consumer protection laws against national banks. The federal government's actions were so egregious and so unprecedented that all 50 state attorneys general, and all 50 state banking superintendents, actively fought the new rules. But the unanimous opposition of the 50 states did not deter, or even slow, the Bush administration in its goal of protecting the banks. In fact, when my office opened an investigation of possible discrimination in mortgage lending by a number of banks, the OCC filed a federal lawsuit to stop the investigation. Throughout our battles with the OCC and the banks, the mantra of the banks and their defenders was that efforts to curb predatory lending would deny access to credit to the very consumers the states were trying to protect. But the curbs we sought on predatory and unfair lending would have in no way jeopardized access to the legitimate credit market for appropriately priced loans. Instead, they would have stopped the scourge of predatory lending practices that have resulted in countless thousands of consumers losing their homes and put our economy in a precarious position. When history tells the story of the subprime lending crisis and recounts its devastating effects on the lives of so many innocent homeowners, the Bush administration will not be judged favorably. The tale is still unfolding, but when the dust settles, it will be judged as a willing accomplice to the lenders who went to any lengths in their quest for profits. So willing, in fact, that it used the power of the federal government in an unprecedented assault on state legislatures, as well as on state attorneys general and anyone else on the side of consumers. The writer is governor of New York.
Thursday, February 14, 2008; Page A25
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: All (#0)
The Washington Post published this piece by Spitzer on Feb. 14, the day after the feds staked out Spitzer's meeting with a hooker at the Mayflower Hotel.
To reason, indeed, he was not in the habit of attending. His mode of arguing, if it is to be so called, was one not uncommon among dull and stubborn persons, who are accustomed to be surrounded by their inferiors. He asserted a proposition; and, as often as wiser people ventured respectfully to show that it was erroneous, he asserted it again, in exactly the same words, and conceived that, by doing so, he at once disposed of all objections. - Macaulay, "History of England," Vol. 1, Chapter 6, on James II.
Spritzer is such a self righteous hypocrite.
I wonder if the Bush regime is that thin skinned.
'Individuals should not take responsibility for their own defense. That’s what the police are for. ... If I oppose individuals defending themselves, I have to support police defending them. I have to support a police state.”' Alan Dershowitz
Socialism for the elites and the bankers, free market dog-eat-dog "fuck you I got mine" capitalism for the rest of us.
#2. To: aristeides (#0)
#3. To: aristeides (#1)
#4. To: aristeides (#0)
 | Gold and silver are REAL money, paper is but a promise. |
#5. To: Elliott Jackalope (#4)
by the hundreds of billions
Socialism for the elites and the bankers,
'Individuals should not take responsibility for their own defense. That’s what the police are for. ... If I oppose individuals defending themselves, I have to support police defending them. I have to support a police state.”' Alan Dershowitz
#6. To: Cynicom (#2)
Am I to take it that you disagree with his disapproval of the feds' behavior with respect to predatory lending?
Spritzer is such a self righteous hypocrite.
To reason, indeed, he was not in the habit of attending. His mode of arguing, if it is to be so called, was one not uncommon among dull and stubborn persons, who are accustomed to be surrounded by their inferiors. He asserted a proposition; and, as often as wiser people ventured respectfully to show that it was erroneous, he asserted it again, in exactly the same words, and conceived that, by doing so, he at once disposed of all objections. - Macaulay, "History of England," Vol. 1, Chapter 6, on James II.
#7. To: aristeides (#0)
Great piece, but I wonder if anyone understands what is being said behind the scences? This is a revelation that the Bush regime, and by extension, all of Washington, DC, knew exactly what they were doing in pumping up the housing bubble. The economy has/had been imploding since 1999, as has been discussed in a number of posts in 4um; THE GOVERNMENT WAS WELL AWARE OF THIS, and well aware of the math behind credit bubbles, and how the good-times were coming to an end. How do you buy a couple of extra years in such a situation? Well, you create a big blow-off bubble, and that is exactly what 'they' did. The other side of this coin is that the bigger the blow-off, the more severe the problems after. Any more questions about what 'they' have been doing with all of the new laws, prison camps, wars, militarized police, survilance and the like?
What did the Bush administration do in response? Did it reverse course and decide to take action to halt this burgeoning scourge? As Americans are now painfully aware, with hundreds of thousands of homeowners facing foreclosure and our markets reeling, the answer is a resounding no.
When a man who is honestly mistaken hears the truth, he will either quit being mistaken or cease to be honest. ++++ Attention, Shrub; A life of evil is ultimately a life of wretchedness.
#8. To: richard9151 (#7)
It's just like the depression of the 1930s, when the banks forclosed on the remaining viable family farms. I shudder to think what the next phase of urban sprawl shall look like.
“Our battered suitcases were piled on the sidewalk again; we had longer ways to go. But no matter, the road is life." - Jack Kerouac
#9. To: Dakmar (#8)
Why would you have to think? Just dial up a picture on the internet of any of the third world slums in South or Central America, and enjoy!
I shudder to think what the next phase of urban sprawl shall look like.
When a man who is honestly mistaken hears the truth, he will either quit being mistaken or cease to be honest. ++++ Attention, Shrub; A life of evil is ultimately a life of wretchedness.
#10. To: richard9151 (#9)
Correct, and it makes me shudder.
“Our battered suitcases were piled on the sidewalk again; we had longer ways to go. But no matter, the road is life." - Jack Kerouac
#11. To: aristeides (#6)
The pot calling the kettle black while standing in the sewer equals hypocrite, regardless of what he is for or against. Spritzer is part and parcel of the system, hang 'em all.
Am I to take it that you disagree with his disapproval of the feds' behavior with respect to predatory lending?
#12. To: Dakmar (#0)
ping
'Individuals should not take responsibility for their own defense. That’s what the police are for. ... If I oppose individuals defending themselves, I have to support police defending them. I have to support a police state.”' Alan Dershowitz
#13. To: robin (#12)
ping a pong
“Our battered suitcases were piled on the sidewalk again; we had longer ways to go. But no matter, the road is life." - Jack Kerouac
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest