Status: Not Logged In; Sign In Israel/ZionismSee other Israel/Zionism ArticlesTitle: Oscar Wright Argues that America Entered WW1 for Zionists Source: YT URL Source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oHND7MEonuE Published: Sep 16, 2007 Author: Video: YouKnowIAmRight Post Date: 2008-05-04 00:23:02 by buckeye Keywords: NoneViews: 478 Comments: 4 Oscar Wright talks about Hitler and the Jews Poster Comment:Going to another revisionist source, IHR: Behind the Balfour Declaration: Britain's Great War Pledge To Lord Rothschild by Robert John. There was a stalemate on all fronts. In Britain, France and Germany, hardly a family numbered all its sons among the living. But the British public -- and the French, and the German -- were not allowed to know the numbers of the dead and wounded. By restricting war correspondents, the American people were not allowed to know the truth either. The figures that are known are a recital of horrors.[E] In these circumstances, a European tradition of negotiated peace in scores of wars, might have led to peace at the end of 1916 or early 1917. Into this gloomy winter of 1916 walked a new figure. He was James Malcolm, [F] an Oxford educated Armenian [G] who, at the beginning of 1916, with the sanction of the British and Russian Governments, had been appointed by the Armenian Patriarch a member of the Armenian National Delegation to take charge of Armenian interests during and after the war. In this official capacity, and as adviser to the British Government on Eastern affairs, [95] he had frequent contacts with the Cabinet Office, the Foreign Office, the War Office and the French and other Allied embassies in London, and made visits to Paris for consultations with his colleagues and leading French officials. He was passionately devoted to an Allied victory which he hoped would guarantee the national freedom of the Armenians then under Turkish and Russian rule. Sir Mark Sykes, with whom he was on terms of family friendship, told him that the Cabinet was looking anxiously for United States intervention in the war on the side of the Allies, but when asked what progress was being made in that direction, Sykes shook his head glumly, "Precious little," he replied. James Malcolm now suggested to Mark Sykes that the reason why previous overtures to American Jewry to support the Allies had received no attention was because the approach had been made to the wrong people. It was to the Zionist Jews that the British and French Governments should address their parleys. "You are going the wrong way about it," said Mr. Malcolm. "You can win the sympathy of certain politically-minded Jews everywhere, and especially in the United States, in one way only, and that is, by offering to try and secure Palestine for them." [96] What really weighed most heavily now with Sykes were the terms of the secret Sykes-Picot Agreement. He told Malcolm that to offer to secure Palestine for the Jews was impossible. "Malcolm insisted that there was no other way and urged a Cabinet discussion. A day or two later, Sykes told him that the matter had been mentioned to Lord Milner who had asked for further information. Malcolm pointed out the influence of Judge Brandeis of the American Supreme Court, and his strong Zionist sympathies." [97] For the source of this Malcolm/Sykes dialog, Robert John cites Landman, Balfour Declaration: Secret Facts Revealed, Vol. 2, No 43, 22 February 1935; also, Malcolm, Origins of the Balfour Declaration: Dr. Weizmann's Contribution, pp. 2-3, neither of which I have read. These characterizations of dialog between UK and American Zionists regarding the opportunity to bring the United States into the war are intriguing. One can be sure that there is some degree of plausible denial that the Zionists had any real ability to bring the US into the war. The American people were reminded by the Wilsonians, who had already founded the Federal Reserve, of their kinship with the peoples of France and Britain (long since forgotten by the elite of today). Even if the assertion that Zionists persuaded the American political Establishment to enter WW1 in order to obtain the Balfour declaration is unprovable, one can assume that Germans who had endured WW1 and the reparations that followed could have easily been persuaded that it were true. Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest #1. To: richard9151, christine, nobody, Itisa1mosttoolate, Cynicom, Jethro Tull, echo5sierra, Peppa (#0) Thought-provoking. Your comments are welcome. buckeye posted on 2008-05-04 0:25:23 ET Reply Trace Private Reply #2. To: buckeye (#0) You may be interested in this if you haven't already seen it: Great Britain, the Jews and Palestine (1936) by Samuel Landman. "The author of this pamphlet is a well-known English Zionist. He was Hon. Secretary of the Joint Zionist Council of the United Kingdom in 1912, Joint Editor of the" Zionist" in 1913-14 and Author of pamphlets on "History of Zionism" and " Zionism, Its Organisation and Institutions" published during the war. From 1917 to 1922 he was Solicitor and Secretary to the Zionist Organisation. He is now Legal Adviser to the New Zionist Organisation." "...During the critical days of 1916 and of the impending defection of Russia, Jewry, as a whole, was against the Czarist regime and had hopes that Germany, if victorious, would in certain circumstances give them Palestine. Several attempts to bring America into the War on the side of the Allies by influencing influential Jewish opinion were made and had failed. Mr. James A. Malcolm, who was already aware of German pre-war efforts to secure a foothold in Palestine through the Zionist Jews and of the abortive Anglo-French démarches at Washington and New York; and knew that Mr. Woodrow Wilson, for good and sufficient reasons, always attached the greatest possible importance to the advice of a very prominent Zionist (Mr. Justice Brandeis, of the U.S. Supreme Court) ; and was in close touch with Mr. Greenberg, Editor of the Jewish Chronicle (London) ; and knew that several important Zionist Jewish leaders had already gravitated to London from the Continent on the qui vive awaiting events ; and appreciated and realised the depth and strength of Jewish national aspirations; spontaneously took the initiative, to convince first of all Sir Mark Sykes, Under Secretary to the War Cabinet,and afterwards Monsieur Georges Picot, of the French Embassy in London, and Monsieur Goût of the Quai d'Orsay (Eastern Section), that the best and perhaps the only way (which proved so to be) to induce the American President to come into the War was to secure the co-operation of Zionist Jews by promising them Palestine, and thus enlist and mobilise the hitherto unsuspectedly powerful forces of Zionist Jews in America and elsewhere in favour of the Allies on a quid pro quo contract basis. Thus, as will be seen, the Zionists, having carried out their part, and greatly helped to bring America in, the Balfour Declaration of 1917 was but the public confirmation of the necessarily secret " gentleman's " agreement of 1916 made with the previous knowledge, acquiescence and/or approval of the Arabs and of the British, American, French and other Allied Governments, and not merely a voluntary altruistic and romantic gesture on the part of Great Britain as certain people either through pardonable ignorance assume or unpardonable illwill would represent or rather misrepresent." "Abe Foxman, my good friend and partner." - John Negroponte Read New History JiminyC posted on 2008-05-04 0:38:20 ET Reply Trace Private Reply #3. To: buckeye (#0) Unless one has researched and studied Col. Edward House, they cannot appreciate our participation in WW1.... The title of Colonel was false as was his name, as usual for Zionists in hiding. ""Colonel' Edward Mandel House was 'the British-educated son of a representative of England's financial interests in the American South. The title was honorary; House never served in the military. He was strictly a behind-the-scenes wire-puller and is regarded by many historians as the real President of the United States during the Wilson years." "House had set down his political ideas in his book called Philip Dru: Administrator in 1912. In this book House laid out a thinly fictionalized plan for conquest of America by establishing 'Socialism as dreamed by Karl Marx'. He described a 'conspiracy' - the word is his - which succeeds in electing a U.S. President by means of 'deception regarding his real opinions and intentions'. Among other things, House wrote that the conspiracy was to insinuate 'itself into the primaries, in order that no candidate might be nominated whose views were not in accord with theirs'. Elections were to become mere charades conducted for the bedazzlement of the booboisie. The idea was to use both the Democrat and Republican parties as instruments to promote World government." - Gary Allen, None Dare Call It Conspiracy Cynicom posted on 2008-05-04 8:09:04 ET Reply Trace Private Reply #4. To: buckeye (#0) James Malcolm now suggested to Mark Sykes that the reason why previous overtures to American Jewry to support the Allies had received no attention was because the approach had been made to the wrong people. It was to the Zionist Jews that the British and French Governments should address their parleys. The title is correct, and the intent from the beginning was to bring the United States into the war. The simple fact is that the war was impossible without an event that occurred inside the United States; the creation of the Federal Reserve, and the new ability to indebt the formerly free people of the states and pay for another war -- in Europe. All of the European nations were in debt as far as they could go. In that regard, the above paragraph is misleading, as the plan to involve the Zionists, who own the Federal Reserve and always have, was well advanced LONG before 1916. Wilson, who was not particularly smart, was elected by the government controllers specifically to sign the Federal Reserve Act and to bring the US into WWI. He was more like a puppy being trained by his mentor and master, the famous Col. House. If you want some more background, do a google on Col. House and Wilson together. When a man who is honestly mistaken hears the truth, he will either quit being mistaken or cease to be honest. ++++++++++ Attention, Shrub; A life of evil is ultimately a life of wretchedness. richard9151 posted on 2008-05-04 11:51:06 ET Reply Trace Private Reply Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Israel/ZionismSee other Israel/Zionism Articles
Title: Oscar Wright Argues that America Entered WW1 for Zionists Source: YT URL Source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oHND7MEonuE Published: Sep 16, 2007 Author: Video: YouKnowIAmRight Post Date: 2008-05-04 00:23:02 by buckeye Keywords: NoneViews: 478 Comments: 4
Oscar Wright talks about Hitler and the Jews Poster Comment:Going to another revisionist source, IHR: Behind the Balfour Declaration: Britain's Great War Pledge To Lord Rothschild by Robert John. There was a stalemate on all fronts. In Britain, France and Germany, hardly a family numbered all its sons among the living. But the British public -- and the French, and the German -- were not allowed to know the numbers of the dead and wounded. By restricting war correspondents, the American people were not allowed to know the truth either. The figures that are known are a recital of horrors.[E] In these circumstances, a European tradition of negotiated peace in scores of wars, might have led to peace at the end of 1916 or early 1917. Into this gloomy winter of 1916 walked a new figure. He was James Malcolm, [F] an Oxford educated Armenian [G] who, at the beginning of 1916, with the sanction of the British and Russian Governments, had been appointed by the Armenian Patriarch a member of the Armenian National Delegation to take charge of Armenian interests during and after the war. In this official capacity, and as adviser to the British Government on Eastern affairs, [95] he had frequent contacts with the Cabinet Office, the Foreign Office, the War Office and the French and other Allied embassies in London, and made visits to Paris for consultations with his colleagues and leading French officials. He was passionately devoted to an Allied victory which he hoped would guarantee the national freedom of the Armenians then under Turkish and Russian rule. Sir Mark Sykes, with whom he was on terms of family friendship, told him that the Cabinet was looking anxiously for United States intervention in the war on the side of the Allies, but when asked what progress was being made in that direction, Sykes shook his head glumly, "Precious little," he replied. James Malcolm now suggested to Mark Sykes that the reason why previous overtures to American Jewry to support the Allies had received no attention was because the approach had been made to the wrong people. It was to the Zionist Jews that the British and French Governments should address their parleys. "You are going the wrong way about it," said Mr. Malcolm. "You can win the sympathy of certain politically-minded Jews everywhere, and especially in the United States, in one way only, and that is, by offering to try and secure Palestine for them." [96] What really weighed most heavily now with Sykes were the terms of the secret Sykes-Picot Agreement. He told Malcolm that to offer to secure Palestine for the Jews was impossible. "Malcolm insisted that there was no other way and urged a Cabinet discussion. A day or two later, Sykes told him that the matter had been mentioned to Lord Milner who had asked for further information. Malcolm pointed out the influence of Judge Brandeis of the American Supreme Court, and his strong Zionist sympathies." [97] For the source of this Malcolm/Sykes dialog, Robert John cites Landman, Balfour Declaration: Secret Facts Revealed, Vol. 2, No 43, 22 February 1935; also, Malcolm, Origins of the Balfour Declaration: Dr. Weizmann's Contribution, pp. 2-3, neither of which I have read. These characterizations of dialog between UK and American Zionists regarding the opportunity to bring the United States into the war are intriguing. One can be sure that there is some degree of plausible denial that the Zionists had any real ability to bring the US into the war. The American people were reminded by the Wilsonians, who had already founded the Federal Reserve, of their kinship with the peoples of France and Britain (long since forgotten by the elite of today). Even if the assertion that Zionists persuaded the American political Establishment to enter WW1 in order to obtain the Balfour declaration is unprovable, one can assume that Germans who had endured WW1 and the reparations that followed could have easily been persuaded that it were true.
Poster Comment:
Going to another revisionist source, IHR: Behind the Balfour Declaration: Britain's Great War Pledge To Lord Rothschild by Robert John.
There was a stalemate on all fronts. In Britain, France and Germany, hardly a family numbered all its sons among the living. But the British public -- and the French, and the German -- were not allowed to know the numbers of the dead and wounded. By restricting war correspondents, the American people were not allowed to know the truth either.
The figures that are known are a recital of horrors.[E]
In these circumstances, a European tradition of negotiated peace in scores of wars, might have led to peace at the end of 1916 or early 1917.
Into this gloomy winter of 1916 walked a new figure. He was James Malcolm, [F] an Oxford educated Armenian [G] who, at the beginning of 1916, with the sanction of the British and Russian Governments, had been appointed by the Armenian Patriarch a member of the Armenian National Delegation to take charge of Armenian interests during and after the war. In this official capacity, and as adviser to the British Government on Eastern affairs, [95] he had frequent contacts with the Cabinet Office, the Foreign Office, the War Office and the French and other Allied embassies in London, and made visits to Paris for consultations with his colleagues and leading French officials. He was passionately devoted to an Allied victory which he hoped would guarantee the national freedom of the Armenians then under Turkish and Russian rule.
Sir Mark Sykes, with whom he was on terms of family friendship, told him that the Cabinet was looking anxiously for United States intervention in the war on the side of the Allies, but when asked what progress was being made in that direction, Sykes shook his head glumly, "Precious little," he replied.
James Malcolm now suggested to Mark Sykes that the reason why previous overtures to American Jewry to support the Allies had received no attention was because the approach had been made to the wrong people. It was to the Zionist Jews that the British and French Governments should address their parleys.
"You are going the wrong way about it," said Mr. Malcolm. "You can win the sympathy of certain politically-minded Jews everywhere, and especially in the United States, in one way only, and that is, by offering to try and secure Palestine for them." [96]
What really weighed most heavily now with Sykes were the terms of the secret Sykes-Picot Agreement. He told Malcolm that to offer to secure Palestine for the Jews was impossible. "Malcolm insisted that there was no other way and urged a Cabinet discussion. A day or two later, Sykes told him that the matter had been mentioned to Lord Milner who had asked for further information. Malcolm pointed out the influence of Judge Brandeis of the American Supreme Court, and his strong Zionist sympathies." [97]
These characterizations of dialog between UK and American Zionists regarding the opportunity to bring the United States into the war are intriguing. One can be sure that there is some degree of plausible denial that the Zionists had any real ability to bring the US into the war. The American people were reminded by the Wilsonians, who had already founded the Federal Reserve, of their kinship with the peoples of France and Britain (long since forgotten by the elite of today). Even if the assertion that Zionists persuaded the American political Establishment to enter WW1 in order to obtain the Balfour declaration is unprovable, one can assume that Germans who had endured WW1 and the reparations that followed could have easily been persuaded that it were true.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
#1. To: richard9151, christine, nobody, Itisa1mosttoolate, Cynicom, Jethro Tull, echo5sierra, Peppa (#0) Thought-provoking. Your comments are welcome. buckeye posted on 2008-05-04 0:25:23 ET Reply Trace Private Reply #2. To: buckeye (#0) You may be interested in this if you haven't already seen it: Great Britain, the Jews and Palestine (1936) by Samuel Landman. "The author of this pamphlet is a well-known English Zionist. He was Hon. Secretary of the Joint Zionist Council of the United Kingdom in 1912, Joint Editor of the" Zionist" in 1913-14 and Author of pamphlets on "History of Zionism" and " Zionism, Its Organisation and Institutions" published during the war. From 1917 to 1922 he was Solicitor and Secretary to the Zionist Organisation. He is now Legal Adviser to the New Zionist Organisation." "...During the critical days of 1916 and of the impending defection of Russia, Jewry, as a whole, was against the Czarist regime and had hopes that Germany, if victorious, would in certain circumstances give them Palestine. Several attempts to bring America into the War on the side of the Allies by influencing influential Jewish opinion were made and had failed. Mr. James A. Malcolm, who was already aware of German pre-war efforts to secure a foothold in Palestine through the Zionist Jews and of the abortive Anglo-French démarches at Washington and New York; and knew that Mr. Woodrow Wilson, for good and sufficient reasons, always attached the greatest possible importance to the advice of a very prominent Zionist (Mr. Justice Brandeis, of the U.S. Supreme Court) ; and was in close touch with Mr. Greenberg, Editor of the Jewish Chronicle (London) ; and knew that several important Zionist Jewish leaders had already gravitated to London from the Continent on the qui vive awaiting events ; and appreciated and realised the depth and strength of Jewish national aspirations; spontaneously took the initiative, to convince first of all Sir Mark Sykes, Under Secretary to the War Cabinet,and afterwards Monsieur Georges Picot, of the French Embassy in London, and Monsieur Goût of the Quai d'Orsay (Eastern Section), that the best and perhaps the only way (which proved so to be) to induce the American President to come into the War was to secure the co-operation of Zionist Jews by promising them Palestine, and thus enlist and mobilise the hitherto unsuspectedly powerful forces of Zionist Jews in America and elsewhere in favour of the Allies on a quid pro quo contract basis. Thus, as will be seen, the Zionists, having carried out their part, and greatly helped to bring America in, the Balfour Declaration of 1917 was but the public confirmation of the necessarily secret " gentleman's " agreement of 1916 made with the previous knowledge, acquiescence and/or approval of the Arabs and of the British, American, French and other Allied Governments, and not merely a voluntary altruistic and romantic gesture on the part of Great Britain as certain people either through pardonable ignorance assume or unpardonable illwill would represent or rather misrepresent." "Abe Foxman, my good friend and partner." - John Negroponte Read New History JiminyC posted on 2008-05-04 0:38:20 ET Reply Trace Private Reply #3. To: buckeye (#0) Unless one has researched and studied Col. Edward House, they cannot appreciate our participation in WW1.... The title of Colonel was false as was his name, as usual for Zionists in hiding. ""Colonel' Edward Mandel House was 'the British-educated son of a representative of England's financial interests in the American South. The title was honorary; House never served in the military. He was strictly a behind-the-scenes wire-puller and is regarded by many historians as the real President of the United States during the Wilson years." "House had set down his political ideas in his book called Philip Dru: Administrator in 1912. In this book House laid out a thinly fictionalized plan for conquest of America by establishing 'Socialism as dreamed by Karl Marx'. He described a 'conspiracy' - the word is his - which succeeds in electing a U.S. President by means of 'deception regarding his real opinions and intentions'. Among other things, House wrote that the conspiracy was to insinuate 'itself into the primaries, in order that no candidate might be nominated whose views were not in accord with theirs'. Elections were to become mere charades conducted for the bedazzlement of the booboisie. The idea was to use both the Democrat and Republican parties as instruments to promote World government." - Gary Allen, None Dare Call It Conspiracy Cynicom posted on 2008-05-04 8:09:04 ET Reply Trace Private Reply #4. To: buckeye (#0) James Malcolm now suggested to Mark Sykes that the reason why previous overtures to American Jewry to support the Allies had received no attention was because the approach had been made to the wrong people. It was to the Zionist Jews that the British and French Governments should address their parleys. The title is correct, and the intent from the beginning was to bring the United States into the war. The simple fact is that the war was impossible without an event that occurred inside the United States; the creation of the Federal Reserve, and the new ability to indebt the formerly free people of the states and pay for another war -- in Europe. All of the European nations were in debt as far as they could go. In that regard, the above paragraph is misleading, as the plan to involve the Zionists, who own the Federal Reserve and always have, was well advanced LONG before 1916. Wilson, who was not particularly smart, was elected by the government controllers specifically to sign the Federal Reserve Act and to bring the US into WWI. He was more like a puppy being trained by his mentor and master, the famous Col. House. If you want some more background, do a google on Col. House and Wilson together. When a man who is honestly mistaken hears the truth, he will either quit being mistaken or cease to be honest. ++++++++++ Attention, Shrub; A life of evil is ultimately a life of wretchedness. richard9151 posted on 2008-05-04 11:51:06 ET Reply Trace Private Reply Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Thought-provoking. Your comments are welcome.
buckeye posted on 2008-05-04 0:25:23 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
You may be interested in this if you haven't already seen it: Great Britain, the Jews and Palestine (1936) by Samuel Landman. "The author of this pamphlet is a well-known English Zionist. He was Hon. Secretary of the Joint Zionist Council of the United Kingdom in 1912, Joint Editor of the" Zionist" in 1913-14 and Author of pamphlets on "History of Zionism" and " Zionism, Its Organisation and Institutions" published during the war. From 1917 to 1922 he was Solicitor and Secretary to the Zionist Organisation. He is now Legal Adviser to the New Zionist Organisation." "...During the critical days of 1916 and of the impending defection of Russia, Jewry, as a whole, was against the Czarist regime and had hopes that Germany, if victorious, would in certain circumstances give them Palestine. Several attempts to bring America into the War on the side of the Allies by influencing influential Jewish opinion were made and had failed. Mr. James A. Malcolm, who was already aware of German pre-war efforts to secure a foothold in Palestine through the Zionist Jews and of the abortive Anglo-French démarches at Washington and New York; and knew that Mr. Woodrow Wilson, for good and sufficient reasons, always attached the greatest possible importance to the advice of a very prominent Zionist (Mr. Justice Brandeis, of the U.S. Supreme Court) ; and was in close touch with Mr. Greenberg, Editor of the Jewish Chronicle (London) ; and knew that several important Zionist Jewish leaders had already gravitated to London from the Continent on the qui vive awaiting events ; and appreciated and realised the depth and strength of Jewish national aspirations; spontaneously took the initiative, to convince first of all Sir Mark Sykes, Under Secretary to the War Cabinet,and afterwards Monsieur Georges Picot, of the French Embassy in London, and Monsieur Goût of the Quai d'Orsay (Eastern Section), that the best and perhaps the only way (which proved so to be) to induce the American President to come into the War was to secure the co-operation of Zionist Jews by promising them Palestine, and thus enlist and mobilise the hitherto unsuspectedly powerful forces of Zionist Jews in America and elsewhere in favour of the Allies on a quid pro quo contract basis. Thus, as will be seen, the Zionists, having carried out their part, and greatly helped to bring America in, the Balfour Declaration of 1917 was but the public confirmation of the necessarily secret " gentleman's " agreement of 1916 made with the previous knowledge, acquiescence and/or approval of the Arabs and of the British, American, French and other Allied Governments, and not merely a voluntary altruistic and romantic gesture on the part of Great Britain as certain people either through pardonable ignorance assume or unpardonable illwill would represent or rather misrepresent."
Great Britain, the Jews and Palestine (1936) by Samuel Landman.
"The author of this pamphlet is a well-known English Zionist. He was Hon. Secretary of the Joint Zionist Council of the United Kingdom in 1912, Joint Editor of the" Zionist" in 1913-14 and Author of pamphlets on "History of Zionism" and " Zionism, Its Organisation and Institutions" published during the war. From 1917 to 1922 he was Solicitor and Secretary to the Zionist Organisation. He is now Legal Adviser to the New Zionist Organisation."
"...During the critical days of 1916 and of the impending defection of Russia, Jewry, as a whole, was against the Czarist regime and had hopes that Germany, if victorious, would in certain circumstances give them Palestine. Several attempts to bring America into the War on the side of the Allies by influencing influential Jewish opinion were made and had failed. Mr. James A. Malcolm, who was already aware of German pre-war efforts to secure a foothold in Palestine through the Zionist Jews and of the abortive Anglo-French démarches at Washington and New York; and knew that Mr. Woodrow Wilson, for good and sufficient reasons, always attached the greatest possible importance to the advice of a very prominent Zionist (Mr. Justice Brandeis, of the U.S. Supreme Court) ; and was in close touch with Mr. Greenberg, Editor of the Jewish Chronicle (London) ; and knew that several important Zionist Jewish leaders had already gravitated to London from the Continent on the qui vive awaiting events ; and appreciated and realised the depth and strength of Jewish national aspirations; spontaneously took the initiative, to convince first of all Sir Mark Sykes, Under Secretary to the War Cabinet,and afterwards Monsieur Georges Picot, of the French Embassy in London, and Monsieur Goût of the Quai d'Orsay (Eastern Section), that the best and perhaps the only way (which proved so to be) to induce the American President to come into the War was to secure the co-operation of Zionist Jews by promising them Palestine, and thus enlist and mobilise the hitherto unsuspectedly powerful forces of Zionist Jews in America and elsewhere in favour of the Allies on a quid pro quo contract basis. Thus, as will be seen, the Zionists, having carried out their part, and greatly helped to bring America in, the Balfour Declaration of 1917 was but the public confirmation of the necessarily secret " gentleman's " agreement of 1916 made with the previous knowledge, acquiescence and/or approval of the Arabs and of the British, American, French and other Allied Governments, and not merely a voluntary altruistic and romantic gesture on the part of Great Britain as certain people either through pardonable ignorance assume or unpardonable illwill would represent or rather misrepresent."
"Abe Foxman, my good friend and partner." - John Negroponte Read New History
Read New History
JiminyC posted on 2008-05-04 0:38:20 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
Unless one has researched and studied Col. Edward House, they cannot appreciate our participation in WW1.... The title of Colonel was false as was his name, as usual for Zionists in hiding. ""Colonel' Edward Mandel House was 'the British-educated son of a representative of England's financial interests in the American South. The title was honorary; House never served in the military. He was strictly a behind-the-scenes wire-puller and is regarded by many historians as the real President of the United States during the Wilson years." "House had set down his political ideas in his book called Philip Dru: Administrator in 1912. In this book House laid out a thinly fictionalized plan for conquest of America by establishing 'Socialism as dreamed by Karl Marx'. He described a 'conspiracy' - the word is his - which succeeds in electing a U.S. President by means of 'deception regarding his real opinions and intentions'. Among other things, House wrote that the conspiracy was to insinuate 'itself into the primaries, in order that no candidate might be nominated whose views were not in accord with theirs'. Elections were to become mere charades conducted for the bedazzlement of the booboisie. The idea was to use both the Democrat and Republican parties as instruments to promote World government." - Gary Allen, None Dare Call It Conspiracy
The title of Colonel was false as was his name, as usual for Zionists in hiding.
""Colonel' Edward Mandel House was 'the British-educated son of a representative of England's financial interests in the American South. The title was honorary; House never served in the military. He was strictly a behind-the-scenes wire-puller and is regarded by many historians as the real President of the United States during the Wilson years." "House had set down his political ideas in his book called Philip Dru: Administrator in 1912. In this book House laid out a thinly fictionalized plan for conquest of America by establishing 'Socialism as dreamed by Karl Marx'.
He described a 'conspiracy' - the word is his - which succeeds in electing a U.S. President by means of 'deception regarding his real opinions and intentions'. Among other things, House wrote that the conspiracy was to insinuate 'itself into the primaries, in order that no candidate might be nominated whose views were not in accord with theirs'.
Elections were to become mere charades conducted for the bedazzlement of the booboisie. The idea was to use both the Democrat and Republican parties as instruments to promote World government." - Gary Allen, None Dare Call It Conspiracy
Cynicom posted on 2008-05-04 8:09:04 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
James Malcolm now suggested to Mark Sykes that the reason why previous overtures to American Jewry to support the Allies had received no attention was because the approach had been made to the wrong people. It was to the Zionist Jews that the British and French Governments should address their parleys. The title is correct, and the intent from the beginning was to bring the United States into the war. The simple fact is that the war was impossible without an event that occurred inside the United States; the creation of the Federal Reserve, and the new ability to indebt the formerly free people of the states and pay for another war -- in Europe. All of the European nations were in debt as far as they could go. In that regard, the above paragraph is misleading, as the plan to involve the Zionists, who own the Federal Reserve and always have, was well advanced LONG before 1916. Wilson, who was not particularly smart, was elected by the government controllers specifically to sign the Federal Reserve Act and to bring the US into WWI. He was more like a puppy being trained by his mentor and master, the famous Col. House. If you want some more background, do a google on Col. House and Wilson together.
The title is correct, and the intent from the beginning was to bring the United States into the war. The simple fact is that the war was impossible without an event that occurred inside the United States; the creation of the Federal Reserve, and the new ability to indebt the formerly free people of the states and pay for another war -- in Europe. All of the European nations were in debt as far as they could go.
In that regard, the above paragraph is misleading, as the plan to involve the Zionists, who own the Federal Reserve and always have, was well advanced LONG before 1916.
Wilson, who was not particularly smart, was elected by the government controllers specifically to sign the Federal Reserve Act and to bring the US into WWI. He was more like a puppy being trained by his mentor and master, the famous Col. House. If you want some more background, do a google on Col. House and Wilson together.
When a man who is honestly mistaken hears the truth, he will either quit being mistaken or cease to be honest. ++++++++++ Attention, Shrub; A life of evil is ultimately a life of wretchedness.
richard9151 posted on 2008-05-04 11:51:06 ET Reply Trace Private Reply