[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Tucker Carlson Reveals Who He Thinks Funded Jeffrey Epstein's Crimes

Russia's Dark Future

A Missile Shield for America - A Trillion Dollar Fantasy?

Kentucky School Board Chairman Resigns After Calling for People to ‘Shoot Republicans’

These Are 2025's 'Most Livable' Cities

Nicotine and Fish

Genocide Summer Camp, And Other Notes From The Edge Of The Narrative Matrix

This Can Create Endless Green Energy WITHOUT Electricity

Geoengineering: Who’s Behind It and How We Stop It

Pam Bondi Ordered Prosecution of Dr. Kirk Moore After Refusing to Dismiss Case

California woman bombarded with Amazon packages for over a year

CVS ordered to pay $949 MILLION in Medicaid fraud case.

Starmer has signed up to the UNs agreement to raise taxes in the UK

Magic mushrooms may hold the secret to longevity: Psilocybin extends lifespan by 57% in groundbreaking study

Cops favorite AI tool automatically deletes evidence of when AI was used

Leftist Anti ICE Extremist OPENS FIRE On Cops, $50,000 REWARD For Shooter

With great power comes no accountability.

Auto loan debt hits $1.63T. 20% of buyers now pay $1,000+ monthly. Texas delinquency hits 7.92%.

Quotable Quotes from the Chosenites

Tokara Islands NOW crashing into the Ocean ! Mysterious Swarm continues with OVER 1700 Quakes !

Why Austria Is Suddenly Declaring War on Immigration

Rep. Greene Wants To Remove $500 Million in Military Aid for Nuclear-Armed Israel From NDAA

Netanyahu Lays Groundwork for Additional Strikes on Iran: 'We Didn't Deal With The Enriched Uranium'

Sweden Cracks Down On OnlyFans - Will U.S. Follow Suit?

Joe Rogan CALLS OUT Israel's Media CONTROL

Communist Billionaire Accused Of Funding Anti-ICE Riots Mysteriously Vanishes

6 Factors That Describe China's Current State

Trump Thteatens to Bomb Moscow and Beijing

Little Bitty

Vertiv Drops After Amazon Unveils In-House Liquid Cooling System, Marking Pivot To Liquid


Resistance
See other Resistance Articles

Title: Speech That Killed John F. Kennedy he eludes NEW WORLD ORDER
Source: You Tube
URL Source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ngJNIk8elA&feature=email
Published: Jun 14, 2008
Author: You Tube
Post Date: 2008-06-14 13:05:41 by TwentyTwelve
Keywords: JFK, Speech, John F. Kennedy
Views: 910
Comments: 69

www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ngJNIk8elA&feature=email

Speech That Killed John F. Kennedy he eludes NEW WORLD ORDER

Click for Full Text!

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Comments (1-28) not displayed.
      .
      .
      .

#29. To: TwentyTwelve (#28)

That JFK was onto them..

The NWO had to silence him.

The same as they would do to Obama or mcCain or any of their other puppets should they deviate from the Master Plan.

Rotara  posted on  2008-06-14   22:29:20 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#30. To: TwentyTwelve (#0)
(Edited)

Speech That Killed John F. Kennedy he eludes NEW WORLD ORDER

If that was the speech, I think this was the letter.

----------------------------------------

www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/isr...ments/exchange/index.html

The Kennedy/Ben Gurion/Eshkol Nuclear Exchange

Documents

Document 1. On 5 July (1963), less than ten days after Levi Eshkol became prime minister, Ambassador Barbour delivered a 3-page letter to him from President John Kennedy. Not since President Eisenhower's message to Ben Gurion, in the midst of the Suez crisis in November 1956, had an American president been so blunt with an Israeli prime minister. Kennedy told Eshkol that the American commitment and support of Israel 'could be seriously jeopardized' if Israel did not let the United States obtain 'reliable information' about Israel's efforts in the nuclear field. In the letter Kennedy presented specific demands on how the American inspection visits to Dimona should be executed. Since the United States had not been involved in the building of Dimona and no international law or agreement had been violated, Kennedy demands were indeed unprecedented. They amounted, in effect, to American ultimatum.

Source: Israel State Archive, Jerusalem For more information: Israel and the Bomb, 153-162.

honway  posted on  2008-06-14   22:32:15 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#31. To: honway (#30)

I think this was the letter

I agree.

I shall not vote for evil, lesser or otherwise.

wbales  posted on  2008-06-14   22:44:11 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#32. To: All (#30)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Samson_Option_(book)

the revelation that U.S. President John F. Kennedy attempted to persuade Israel to abandon its nuclear program, and angry notes were exchanged between Kennedy and Israeli Premier David Ben-Gurion in 1963.

# The White House under Kennedy was “fixated” upon what to do about Israel’s nuclear weapons. However, none of the prominent Kennedy biographers, including Arthur Schlesinger and Theodore C. Sorensen mentioned the fact.[9]

President Johnson suppressed the January, 1965 Gilpatric report which called for tough anti-nuclear proliferation efforts, including against Israel, because he feared backlash from American Jews. In June 1965 Senator Robert F. Kennedy publicly called for many of the report’s recommendations, invoking his assassinated brother’s name, thus provoking Johnson to further bury the report.[11]

honway  posted on  2008-06-14   22:47:21 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#33. To: honway (#30)

Thanks.

TwentyTwelve  posted on  2008-06-14   22:47:28 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#34. To: All (#32)

The White House under Kennedy was “fixated” upon what to do about Israel’s nuclear weapons. However, none of the prominent Kennedy biographers, including Arthur Schlesinger and Theodore C. Sorensen mentioned the fact.[9]

An example of revisionist history.

Fact: The Kennedy Administration was “fixated” upon preventing Israel from acquiring nuclear weapons.

Fact: After the Kennedy assassination, Johnson assisted Israel in their nuclear weapons program.

Cui bono?

honway  posted on  2008-06-14   22:51:48 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#35. To: Rotara, TwentyTwelve (#29)

That JFK was onto them..

The NWO had to silence him.

The same as they would do to Obama or mcCain or any of their other puppets should they deviate from the Master Plan.

Word!

HOUNDDAWG  posted on  2008-06-14   22:54:13 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#36. To: All (#32)

President Johnson suppressed the January, 1965 Gilpatric report which called for tough anti-nuclear proliferation efforts, including against Israel, because he feared backlash from American Jews. In June 1965 Senator Robert F. Kennedy publicly called for many of the report’s recommendations, invoking his assassinated brother’s name, thus provoking Johnson to further bury the report.

Gilpatric Report

www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB1/nhch7_1.htm

honway  posted on  2008-06-14   22:57:33 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#37. To: honway (#34)

Arthur Schlesinger

Any relation to the traitorous James Schlesinger clan?

Rotara  posted on  2008-06-14   23:07:57 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#38. To: Rotara (#29)

Greetings.

Thanks for joining in with us.

Lod  posted on  2008-06-14   23:08:08 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#39. To: HOUNDDAWG, TwentyTwelve, Christine (#35)

That JFK was onto them..

The NWO had to silence him.

The same as they would do to Obama or mcCain or any of their other puppets should they deviate from the Master Plan.

Word!

I love Freedom4um! You people get it!!

Rotara  posted on  2008-06-14   23:08:56 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#40. To: HOUNDDAWG, (#19)

You obviously want to believe that Mary Jo's death was the result of some scheme to discredit Kennedy. What I don't see is why you lean that way. If you have some compelling evidence or argument then why not share it?

All I did was give reasons why I am willing to consider it.

They had already shot 2 kennedys, the third was going to run.

I would expect the NWO to come up with something creative, why not this?

My arguments don't have to be compelling to you, i like em, that's enough for me.

castletrash  posted on  2008-06-14   23:09:38 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#41. To: lodwick (#38)

Greetings.

Thanks for joining in with us.

Thank you guys for being so intuitive and accepting!

I hope this isn't a dream where I wake up back in NEOCONland where I lurked before I heard of Freedom4um!

Rotara  posted on  2008-06-14   23:11:13 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#42. To: castletrash (#40)

Well, your post to me (14) seemed like a modest attempt to support your belief in a conspiracy.

I invested quite a bit of energy in my post (8) in the attempt to explain my views to you.

Had I known that asking you to elaborate and to engage in honest to goodness dialog would result in a flip response I wouldn't have posted to you.

Sorry for any trouble I may have caused.

I won't make that mistake again.

HOUNDDAWG  posted on  2008-06-14   23:30:47 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#43. To: Rotara (#39)

Yeth we dew!!

Photobucket

Photobucket

HOUNDDAWG  posted on  2008-06-14   23:33:58 ET  (2 images) Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#44. To: HOUNDDAWG (#43)

Yeth we dew!!

Cute dawg! Don't let certain Marines get their hands on it. Oops!

Rotara  posted on  2008-06-14   23:36:34 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#45. To: castletrash (#40)

Mary Jo's death was the result of some scheme to discredit Kennedy

I never heard that hypothesis before. The most compelling reason I can think of would be that killing all 3 Kennedys might have raised more than a few eyebrows.

I shall not vote for evil, lesser or otherwise.

Critter  posted on  2008-06-14   23:37:37 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#46. To: Rotara (#37) (Edited)

Arthur Schlesinger

Any relation to the traitorous James Schlesinger clan?

Other than the fact they are/were both Jewish, I am unaware of any relation. Thanks for the question. It does appear interesting that a Jewish biographer of JFK would leave out the important fact that the Kennedy Administration was fixed on preventing Israel from acquiring nuclear weapons.

198.62.75.1/www2/koestler/

Another example of revisionist history is the treatment of the The Khazar Empire and its Heritage.

honway  posted on  2008-06-14   23:40:03 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#47. To: HOUNDDAWG (#42)

asking you to elaborate and to engage in honest to goodness dialog

I have no desire to elaborate, no facts to offer, because I'm not out to convince. That's my point.

I just think its an interesting theory that does not need to be dismissed out of hand as

impossible. If there is compelling proof, I don't think i'll find here from bed. No offense was intended.

castletrash  posted on  2008-06-14   23:40:46 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#48. To: Rotara (#44)

Cute dawg! Don't let certain Marines get their hands on it. Oops!

...A low point for the corps, and a textbook example of the corrosive effect a pointless slaughter has on the morals of young men serving the evil ones.

HOUNDDAWG  posted on  2008-06-14   23:41:35 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#49. To: honway (#46)

Other than the fact they are/were both Jewish, I am unaware of any relation. Thanks for the question. It does appear interesting that a Jewish biographer of JFK would leave out the important fact that the Kennedy Administration was fixed on preventing Israel from acquiring nuclear weapons.

Sometimes you would think that's all it takes. ;-)

Rotara  posted on  2008-06-14   23:43:41 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#50. To: HOUNDDAWG (#48)

...A low point for the corps, and a textbook example of the corrosive effect a pointless slaughter has on the morals of young men serving the evil ones.

I don't think it is corrosive effect as much as it is an indicator of the type of people who would volunteer to serve in a military engaged in such a war. Anyone with any sense would steer well clear of service at this point in time.

I shall not vote for evil, lesser or otherwise.

Critter  posted on  2008-06-14   23:44:32 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#51. To: Critter, castletrash (#45)

I never heard that hypothesis before. The most compelling reason I can think of would be that killing all 3 Kennedys might have raised more than a few eyebrows.

Why would they want to kill the stupid one who embraced world socialism the minute he knew the Plan?

Rotara  posted on  2008-06-14   23:46:10 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#52. To: HOUNDDAWG (#48)

Cute dawg! Don't let certain Marines get their hands on it. Oops!

...A low point for the corps, and a textbook example of the corrosive effect a pointless slaughter has on the morals of young men serving the evil ones.

Of course had it been an Iraqi infant they would have gotten promotions. -end sarcasm-

Rotara  posted on  2008-06-14   23:47:34 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#53. To: Critter (#50)

I don't think it is corrosive effect as much as it is an indicator of the type of people who would volunteer to serve in a military engaged in such a war. Anyone with any sense would steer well clear of service at this point in time.

Which probably explains why Mike Reagan put out a hit on Dice for starting a campaign to wake up our soldiers.

The really sad thing is that these ass hats come back to the police state and join the local goon squad.

Rotara  posted on  2008-06-14   23:49:12 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#54. To: Rotara (#52)

...A low point for the corps, and a textbook example of the corrosive effect a pointless slaughter has on the morals of young men serving the evil ones.

Of course had it been an Iraqi infant they would have gotten promotions. -end sarcasm-

Sadly, true words are often spoken in jest.

____________________________

Welcome to 4 Rotara, and good night!

HOUNDDAWG  posted on  2008-06-14   23:49:47 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#55. To: Rotara (#51)

To be honest, I don't know where Ted was at back then... I was sleepwalking through life, but maybe it was feared that he might use the position to root out what really happened to his bros? Who knows.

I shall not vote for evil, lesser or otherwise.

Critter  posted on  2008-06-14   23:50:38 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#56. To: Rotara (#53)

these ass hats come back to the police state and join the local goon squad

Yeah, I have my run ins with those all the time. I don't take any of their shit, I piss them off, but so far, none has had the balls to really push me. :)

I shall not vote for evil, lesser or otherwise.

Critter  posted on  2008-06-14   23:52:21 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#57. To: honway (#34)

Facts 1&2

i didn't know. cui bono indeed.

christine  posted on  2008-06-14   23:54:34 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#58. To: HOUNDDAWG (#54)

Sadly, true words are often spoken in jest.

____________________________

Welcome to 4 Rotara, and good night!

Yes, that's true.

Thank you! Good night to you DAWG!

Rotara  posted on  2008-06-14   23:55:13 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#59. To: Critter, rotara (#55)

Why do this to Ted Kennedy?

he could have had a successful run at the presidency........ he knows/knew something

and needed controlling....... the romans used to kill any male in a position to take revenge...

only the shadow knows

castletrash  posted on  2008-06-14   23:58:17 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#60. To: Critter (#55)

Who knows.

I don't know either. I DO know that Ted Kennedy craps on Americans and wipes his rear with the Constitution as often as he can.

He might as well have been Juan McAmnesty's VP. I'm sure Liebervitch will get that slot. ;-)

Rotara  posted on  2008-06-15   0:03:08 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#61. To: Critter, ALL (#56)

Yeah, I have my run ins with those all the time. I don't take any of their shit, I piss them off, but so far, none has had the balls to really push me. :)

Good for you! And good for THEM I'm sure! ;-)

I'm going to log off, take care and thank you for the hospitality!

Rotara  posted on  2008-06-15   0:04:33 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#62. To: castletrash (#59)

Why do this to Ted Kennedy?

See #60.

Ted gives the Kennedy's a really bad name, undeservedly so to a large degree IMO.

Good night and take care! ;-)

Rotara  posted on  2008-06-15   0:05:58 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#63. To: Rotara (#60)

I don't know either.

All I do know is that most of my time is spent making preparations for the worst.

I shall not vote for evil, lesser or otherwise.

Critter  posted on  2008-06-15   0:07:46 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#64. To: Rotara (#61)

Welcome to 4um and stay well.

I shall not vote for evil, lesser or otherwise.

Critter  posted on  2008-06-15   0:08:28 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#65. To: Rotara (#62)

Your name is vaguely familiar.

Check out my blog, America, the Bushieful.

Arator  posted on  2008-06-15   2:07:45 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#66. To: Arator (#65)

Your name is vaguely familiar.

Kinda like the time when Ash was the scourge of FR and banned under many screen names. I created a dummy account name Evilasihsa (Ashisalive backwards) and had some fun.

I shall not vote for evil, lesser or otherwise.

Critter  posted on  2008-06-15   10:51:13 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#67. To: Critter (#66)

Kinda like the time when Ash was the scourge of FR and banned under many screen names. I created a dummy account name Evilasihsa (Ashisalive backwards) and had some fun.

Yes, exactly. "Rotara" was one of my pseudonyms at FR. I liked to unban myself in plain site. Jim Rob was slow to notice. I'd have extended exchanges with him as "Rotara" or "Ara Torres Bach" or "frisnotf" arguing about FR censorship. It was hilarious.

Check out my blog, America, the Bushieful.

Arator  posted on  2008-06-15   11:49:53 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#68. To: Arator (#65)

Your name is vaguely familiar.

I put a lot of time into choosing my username!

You would have to speak Spanglish and be a "Masters of the Universe" fan to understand. ;-)

Nothing personal.

Rotara  posted on  2008-06-15   13:25:45 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#69. To: Arator (#67)

Yes, exactly. "Rotara" was one of my pseudonyms at FR. I liked to unban myself in plain site. Jim Rob was slow to notice. I'd have extended exchanges with him as "Rotara" or "Ara Torres Bach" or "frisnotf" arguing about FR censorship. It was hilarious.

Funny!

Rotara  posted on  2008-06-15   13:26:18 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]