Title: Speech That Killed John F. Kennedy he eludes NEW WORLD ORDER Source:
You Tube URL Source:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ngJNIk8elA&feature=email Published:Jun 14, 2008 Author:You Tube Post Date:2008-06-14 13:05:41 by TwentyTwelve Keywords:JFK, Speech, John F. Kennedy Views:910 Comments:69
Document 1. On 5 July (1963), less than ten days after Levi Eshkol became prime minister, Ambassador Barbour delivered a 3-page letter to him from President John Kennedy. Not since President Eisenhower's message to Ben Gurion, in the midst of the Suez crisis in November 1956, had an American president been so blunt with an Israeli prime minister. Kennedy told Eshkol that the American commitment and support of Israel 'could be seriously jeopardized' if Israel did not let the United States obtain 'reliable information' about Israel's efforts in the nuclear field. In the letter Kennedy presented specific demands on how the American inspection visits to Dimona should be executed. Since the United States had not been involved in the building of Dimona and no international law or agreement had been violated, Kennedy demands were indeed unprecedented. They amounted, in effect, to American ultimatum.
Source: Israel State Archive, Jerusalem For more information: Israel and the Bomb, 153-162.
the revelation that U.S. President John F. Kennedy attempted to persuade Israel to abandon its nuclear program, and angry notes were exchanged between Kennedy and Israeli Premier David Ben-Gurion in 1963.
# The White House under Kennedy was fixated upon what to do about Israels nuclear weapons. However, none of the prominent Kennedy biographers, including Arthur Schlesinger and Theodore C. Sorensen mentioned the fact.[9]
President Johnson suppressed the January, 1965 Gilpatric report which called for tough anti-nuclear proliferation efforts, including against Israel, because he feared backlash from American Jews. In June 1965 Senator Robert F. Kennedy publicly called for many of the reports recommendations, invoking his assassinated brothers name, thus provoking Johnson to further bury the report.[11]
The White House under Kennedy was fixated upon what to do about Israels nuclear weapons. However, none of the prominent Kennedy biographers, including Arthur Schlesinger and Theodore C. Sorensen mentioned the fact.[9]
An example of revisionist history.
Fact: The Kennedy Administration was fixated upon preventing Israel from acquiring nuclear weapons.
Fact: After the Kennedy assassination, Johnson assisted Israel in their nuclear weapons program.
President Johnson suppressed the January, 1965 Gilpatric report which called for tough anti-nuclear proliferation efforts, including against Israel, because he feared backlash from American Jews. In June 1965 Senator Robert F. Kennedy publicly called for many of the reports recommendations, invoking his assassinated brothers name, thus provoking Johnson to further bury the report.
You obviously want to believe that Mary Jo's death was the result of some scheme to discredit Kennedy. What I don't see is why you lean that way. If you have some compelling evidence or argument then why not share it?
All I did was give reasons why I am willing to consider it.
They had already shot 2 kennedys, the third was going to run.
I would expect the NWO to come up with something creative, why not this?
My arguments don't have to be compelling to you, i like em, that's enough for me.
Mary Jo's death was the result of some scheme to discredit Kennedy
I never heard that hypothesis before. The most compelling reason I can think of would be that killing all 3 Kennedys might have raised more than a few eyebrows.
Any relation to the traitorous James Schlesinger clan?
Other than the fact they are/were both Jewish, I am unaware of any relation. Thanks for the question. It does appear interesting that a Jewish biographer of JFK would leave out the important fact that the Kennedy Administration was fixed on preventing Israel from acquiring nuclear weapons.
Cute dawg! Don't let certain Marines get their hands on it. Oops!
...A low point for the corps, and a textbook example of the corrosive effect a pointless slaughter has on the morals of young men serving the evil ones.
Other than the fact they are/were both Jewish, I am unaware of any relation. Thanks for the question. It does appear interesting that a Jewish biographer of JFK would leave out the important fact that the Kennedy Administration was fixed on preventing Israel from acquiring nuclear weapons.
Sometimes you would think that's all it takes. ;-)
...A low point for the corps, and a textbook example of the corrosive effect a pointless slaughter has on the morals of young men serving the evil ones.
I don't think it is corrosive effect as much as it is an indicator of the type of people who would volunteer to serve in a military engaged in such a war. Anyone with any sense would steer well clear of service at this point in time.
I never heard that hypothesis before. The most compelling reason I can think of would be that killing all 3 Kennedys might have raised more than a few eyebrows.
Why would they want to kill the stupid one who embraced world socialism the minute he knew the Plan?
Cute dawg! Don't let certain Marines get their hands on it. Oops!
...A low point for the corps, and a textbook example of the corrosive effect a pointless slaughter has on the morals of young men serving the evil ones.
Of course had it been an Iraqi infant they would have gotten promotions. -end sarcasm-
I don't think it is corrosive effect as much as it is an indicator of the type of people who would volunteer to serve in a military engaged in such a war. Anyone with any sense would steer well clear of service at this point in time.
Which probably explains why Mike Reagan put out a hit on Dice for starting a campaign to wake up our soldiers.
The really sad thing is that these ass hats come back to the police state and join the local goon squad.
...A low point for the corps, and a textbook example of the corrosive effect a pointless slaughter has on the morals of young men serving the evil ones.
Of course had it been an Iraqi infant they would have gotten promotions. -end sarcasm-
To be honest, I don't know where Ted was at back then... I was sleepwalking through life, but maybe it was feared that he might use the position to root out what really happened to his bros? Who knows.
these ass hats come back to the police state and join the local goon squad
Yeah, I have my run ins with those all the time. I don't take any of their shit, I piss them off, but so far, none has had the balls to really push me. :)
Yeah, I have my run ins with those all the time. I don't take any of their shit, I piss them off, but so far, none has had the balls to really push me. :)
Good for you! And good for THEM I'm sure! ;-)
I'm going to log off, take care and thank you for the hospitality!
Kinda like the time when Ash was the scourge of FR and banned under many screen names. I created a dummy account name Evilasihsa (Ashisalive backwards) and had some fun.
Kinda like the time when Ash was the scourge of FR and banned under many screen names. I created a dummy account name Evilasihsa (Ashisalive backwards) and had some fun.
Yes, exactly. "Rotara" was one of my pseudonyms at FR. I liked to unban myself in plain site. Jim Rob was slow to notice. I'd have extended exchanges with him as "Rotara" or "Ara Torres Bach" or "frisnotf" arguing about FR censorship. It was hilarious.
Yes, exactly. "Rotara" was one of my pseudonyms at FR. I liked to unban myself in plain site. Jim Rob was slow to notice. I'd have extended exchanges with him as "Rotara" or "Ara Torres Bach" or "frisnotf" arguing about FR censorship. It was hilarious.