[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Editorial
See other Editorial Articles

Title: Are You Free Or Just 'Freer'?
Source: The Patriot Review
URL Source: [None]
Published: Jul 4, 1985
Author: C. Ellen Shaffer
Post Date: 2008-07-04 17:30:39 by James Deffenbach
Keywords: None
Views: 714
Comments: 11

Are You Free Or Just 'Freer'?

When I was a child, Americans were proud because they were FREE. Now I find most Americans proclaiming they are 'freer.' When I attempt to point out how Americans are being enslaved, most of them will say, "It may be bad, but we're freer than any people anywhere else on earth." Personally, I would differ with that analysis, but this is not the question before us today. Today I am asking why Americans no longer take pride in being FREE? Is it because all the slaves know they are not free, so they can only proclaim themselves to be 'freer'?

If a man or group of men can force me to act against my will and against my conscience, then I am a slave. If my liberties are controlled, regulated and sold to me, then they are no longer liberties, but privileges. If one person or many can command specific performance from me without paying me for my performance, I am a slave!

Now, it may be true that someone else has a harsher master than I, who demands more performance or imposes more regulation, but it matters not what degree of slavery I suffer if I am a slave. After all, my master can become harsher or change the rules any time he wishes. If he has power over me he can impose his will in any manner he chooses. My status as a slave does not depend on the kind of master I have. My status of slave arises out of my belief that I am under the absolute power of another.

Today, most Americans would run out and buy a walking license if some "government agent" demanded it. If their masters demanded they purchase a permit to mow their lawn most of them would comply. This belief that they are under the absolute power of someone else makes them a slave. It matters not that the masters have not yet demanded such license or permit. What matters is the fact that the slaves would comply if ordered to do so.

There is no doubt, this slavery of the American people has been self imposed; for rape is not rape if one does not struggle. I can assure you that Americans did not struggle. They went meekly into chains while murmuring 'render unto Caesar.' It was quite a feat to turn the posterity of Freedom loving men of courage into sniveling cowards who welcome servitude over the animating contest of liberty and resposibility for themselves.

In Concentration Camps?

The posterity of Freemen now proclaim themselves to be 'freer,' and will continue to do so even when they must shout it from the confines of a concentration camp. They will be so sure that somewhere someone is more in bondage than they!

How would it be if we proclaimed ourselves 'slaver' rather than 'freer'? Is a slave any less a slave simply because his master allows him more privileges than the massah down the road allows his slaves? If we are only free to exercise and enjoy massah's privileges, then we're not free in any sense of the word.

John Stuart Mills once said: "The only freedom which deserves the name is that of pursuing our own good in our own way." If we are pursuing someone else's good in the way they decide is best, then this does not deserve the name of 'freedom.'

Servitude is defined as "submission to a master." Forced action rather than free will action is a mark of slavery, and it matters not that some are compelled less than others.

I think I'll lose my dinner the next time I hear some American coward happily explain how much 'freer' he is than a Russian slave. If he's willing to be 'freer' rather than FREE, he's already a slave and either too cowardly or too dumb to see the light!

I'm not satisfied with being 'freer.' For I am a child of God my Creator who has made me free by his perfect Law of Liberty. If the enjoyment of Life, Liberty and Pursuit of Happiness can have man-made conditions placed upon them, then they are not mine to enjoy.


Had to guess at the date. The article was not dated but I subscribed to that magazine back in the 80's. I thought that today would be a good day to reflect on this question. I agree with the author in that I am not satisfied with being "freer" than some abject slave in another country. Not that I wish for anyone to be a slave but lots of Americans have fought and died so that we could actually be FREE. Happy 4th of July to everyone.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: James Deffenbach (#0)

Today, most Americans would run out and buy a walking license if some "government agent" demanded it. If their masters demanded they purchase a permit to mow their lawn most of them would comply. This belief that they are under the absolute power of someone else makes them a slave. It matters not that the masters have not yet demanded such license or permit. What matters is the fact that the slaves would comply if ordered to do so.

And the bonus plan in effect in 2008 is that for every rebel who fails to get a permit to paint his house or waters his lawn on a "prohibited" day, there's a thousand "patriots" with their finger on the speed-dial to one of the thousands of government tattle-tale lines just itching to turn them in.

I'm ashamed to be called an "Uhhmerkkin."

Esso  posted on  2008-07-04   18:05:16 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: James Deffenbach (#0)

In Concentration Camps?

The posterity of Freemen now proclaim themselves to be 'freer,' and will continue to do so even when they must shout it from the confines of a concentration camp. They will be so sure that somewhere someone is more in bondage than they!

How would it be if we proclaimed ourselves 'slaver' rather than 'freer'? Is a slave any less a slave simply because his master allows him more privileges than the massah down the road allows his slaves? If we are only free to exercise and enjoy massah's privileges, then we're not free in any sense of the word.

Great post!

Live FREE or die

"If you love wealth more than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, depart from us in peace. We ask not your counsel nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you. May your chains rest lightly upon you and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen.”—Samuel Adams

Rotara  posted on  2008-07-04   18:19:48 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: Esso (#1)

And the bonus plan in effect in 2008 is that for every rebel who fails to get a permit to paint his house or waters his lawn on a "prohibited" day, there's a thousand "patriots" with their finger on the speed-dial to one of the thousands of government tattle-tale lines just itching to turn them in.

I'm ashamed to be called an "Uhhmerkkin."

My neighborhood takes America more seriously than yours does, then! {~} LOL

"If you love wealth more than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, depart from us in peace. We ask not your counsel nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you. May your chains rest lightly upon you and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen.”—Samuel Adams

Rotara  posted on  2008-07-04   18:21:14 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: Esso (#1)

And the bonus plan in effect in 2008 is that for every rebel who fails to get a permit to paint his house

Oh my goodness! I have been painting the house and I didn't ask anyone for a permit or permission. Oh, woe is me!!!

But really, I am more like my dad was. The town where I live passed an ordinance some years ago stating that you couldn't cut a tree more than six inches in diameter without a permit. My dad said they could pass all the ordinances they wanted to but when there was a tree on this place that needed cutting it would be cut and they wouldn't be asked about it either. And I have cut some pretty good sized trees here and never seemed to need any permit, they fell just fine.

Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end.
Lord Acton

James Deffenbach  posted on  2008-07-04   18:28:40 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: Rotara (#2)

Great post!

Live FREE or die

Thank you. I like Patrick Henry's thoughts on this matter.

No man thinks more highly than I do of the patriotism, as well as abilities, of the very worthy gentlemen who have just addressed the House. But different men often see the same subject in different lights; and, therefore, I hope it will not be thought disrespectful to those gentlemen if, entertaining as I do opinions of a character very opposite to theirs, I shall speak forth my sentiments freely and without reserve. This is no time for ceremony. The questing before the House is one of awful moment to this country. For my own part, I consider it as nothing less than a question of freedom or slavery; and in proportion to the magnitude of the subject ought to be the freedom of the debate. It is only in this way that we can hope to arrive at truth, and fulfill the great responsibility which we hold to God and our country. Should I keep back my opinions at such a time, through fear of giving offense, I should consider myself as guilty of treason towards my country, and of an act of disloyalty toward the Majesty of Heaven, which I revere above all earthly kings.

Mr. President, it is natural to man to indulge in the illusions of hope. We are apt to shut our eyes against a painful truth, and listen to the song of that siren till she transforms us into beasts. Is this the part of wise men, engaged in a great and arduous struggle for liberty? Are we disposed to be of the number of those who, having eyes, see not, and, having ears, hear not, the things which so nearly concern their temporal salvation? For my part, whatever anguish of spirit it may cost, I am willing to know the whole truth; to know the worst, and to provide for it.

I have but one lamp by which my feet are guided, and that is the lamp of experience. I know of no way of judging of the future but by the past. And judging by the past, I wish to know what there has been in the conduct of the British ministry for the last ten years to justify those hopes with which gentlemen have been pleased to solace themselves and the House. Is it that insidious smile with which our petition has been lately received? Trust it not, sir; it will prove a snare to your feet. Suffer not yourselves to be betrayed with a kiss. Ask yourselves how this gracious reception of our petition comports with those warlike preparations which cover our waters and darken our land. Are fleets and armies necessary to a work of love and reconciliation? Have we shown ourselves so unwilling to be reconciled that force must be called in to win back our love? Let us not deceive ourselves, sir. These are the implements of war and subjugation; the last arguments to which kings resort. I ask gentlemen, sir, what means this martial array, if its purpose be not to force us to submission? Can gentlemen assign any other possible motive for it? Has Great Britain any enemy, in this quarter of the world, to call for all this accumulation of navies and armies? No, sir, she has none. They are meant for us: they can be meant for no other. They are sent over to bind and rivet upon us those chains which the British ministry have been so long forging. And what have we to oppose to them? Shall we try argument? Sir, we have been trying that for the last ten years. Have we anything new to offer upon the subject? Nothing. We have held the subject up in every light of which it is capable; but it has been all in vain. Shall we resort to entreaty and humble supplication? What terms shall we find which have not been already exhausted? Let us not, I beseech you, sir, deceive ourselves. Sir, we have done everything that could be done to avert the storm which is now coming on. We have petitioned; we have remonstrated; we have supplicated; we have prostrated ourselves before the throne, and have implored its interposition to arrest the tyrannical hands of the ministry and Parliament. Our petitions have been slighted; our remonstrances have produced additional violence and insult; our supplications have been disregarded; and we have been spurned, with contempt, from the foot of the throne! In vain, after these things, may we indulge the fond hope of peace and reconciliation. There is no longer any room for hope. If we wish to be free-- if we mean to preserve inviolate those inestimable privileges for which we have been so long contending--if we mean not basely to abandon the noble struggle in which we have been so long engaged, and which we have pledged ourselves never to abandon until the glorious object of our contest shall be obtained--we must fight! I repeat it, sir, we must fight! An appeal to arms and to the God of hosts is all that is left us!

They tell us, sir, that we are weak; unable to cope with so formidable an adversary. But when shall we be stronger? Will it be the next week, or the next year? Will it be when we are totally disarmed, and when a British guard shall be stationed in every house? Shall we gather strength by irresolution and inaction? Shall we acquire the means of effectual resistance by lying supinely on our backs and hugging the delusive phantom of hope, until our enemies shall have bound us hand and foot? Sir, we are not weak if we make a proper use of those means which the God of nature hath placed in our power. The millions of people, armed in the holy cause of liberty, and in such a country as that which we possess, are invincible by any force which our enemy can send against us. Besides, sir, we shall not fight our battles alone. There is a just God who presides over the destinies of nations, and who will raise up friends to fight our battles for us. The battle, sir, is not to the strong alone; it is to the vigilant, the active, the brave. Besides, sir, we have no election. If we were base enough to desire it, it is now too late to retire from the contest. There is no retreat but in submission and slavery! Our chains are forged! Their clanking may be heard on the plains of Boston! The war is inevitable ­ and let it come! I repeat it, sir, let it come.

It is in vain, sir, to extenuate the matter. Gentlemen may cry, Peace, Peace ­ but there is no peace. The war is actually begun! The next gale that sweeps from the north will bring to our ears the clash of resounding arms! Our brethren are already in the field! Why stand we here idle? What is it that gentlemen wish? What would they have? Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!

Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end.
Lord Acton

James Deffenbach  posted on  2008-07-04   18:40:56 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: James Deffenbach (#5)

{{{{goosebumps}}}}

christine  posted on  2008-07-04   18:59:12 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: christine (#6)

Hi Christine. Hope you are having a good 4th.

Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end.
Lord Acton

James Deffenbach  posted on  2008-07-04   19:00:43 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: James Deffenbach (#5)

There is no longer any room for hope. If we wish to be free-- if we mean to preserve inviolate those inestimable privileges for which we have been so long contending--if we mean not basely to abandon the noble struggle in which we have been so long engaged, and which we have pledged ourselves never to abandon until the glorious object of our contest shall be obtained--we must fight! I repeat it, sir, we must fight! An appeal to arms and to the God of hosts is all that is left us!

They tell us, sir, that we are weak; unable to cope with so formidable an adversary. But when shall we be stronger? Will it be the next week, or the next year? Will it be when we are totally disarmed, and when a British guard shall be stationed in every house? Shall we gather strength by irresolution and inaction? Shall we acquire the means of effectual resistance by lying supinely on our backs and hugging the delusive phantom of hope, until our enemies shall have bound us hand and foot? Sir, we are not weak if we make a proper use of those means which the God of nature hath placed in our power. The millions of people, armed in the holy cause of liberty, and in such a country as that which we possess, are invincible by any force which our enemy can send against us. Besides, sir, we shall not fight our battles alone. There is a just God who presides over the destinies of nations, and who will raise up friends to fight our battles for us. The battle, sir, is not to the strong alone; it is to the vigilant, the active, the brave. Besides, sir, we have no election

What a day! ;-)

"If you love wealth more than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, depart from us in peace. We ask not your counsel nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you. May your chains rest lightly upon you and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen.”—Samuel Adams

Rotara  posted on  2008-07-04   19:03:41 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: Rotara (#3)

My neighborhood takes America more seriously than yours does, then!

My 'hood isn't too bad in that regard. The problem is in the hoidy-toidy McMansion/villaminium neighborhoods.

Esso  posted on  2008-07-04   19:11:43 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: Esso (#9)

My 'hood isn't too bad in that regard. The problem is in the hoidy-toidy McMansion/villaminium neighborhoods.

LOL, I was just joking! My 'hood tho series is pretty tite! ;-)

"If you love wealth more than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, depart from us in peace. We ask not your counsel nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you. May your chains rest lightly upon you and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen.”—Samuel Adams

Rotara  posted on  2008-07-04   19:16:02 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: Cynicom (#0)

Ping

Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end.
Lord Acton

James Deffenbach  posted on  2008-11-08   12:53:23 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register]