Title: Brother, beware of white girls who look like this Source:
underprivilegedJournalism URL Source:http://underprivilegedjournalism.wordpress.com/ Published:Aug 18, 2008 Author:underprivilegedJournalism Post Date:2008-08-18 09:22:44 by Jethro Tull Keywords:None Views:1839 Comments:166
Poster Comment:
I see, black on white rape is the fault of the white girl....
It is irrational once you've realized that the so-called choice between establishment Democrats and establishment Republicans is a big scam. Which takes about the same amount of thought to figure out as realizing that Pro Wrestling is fake.
Congress in passing the War Powers Act of 1972 acknowledged the need to grant leeway in the deployment of military assets prior to any Congressional approval for them.
Helloooooooooo..........
Did he subsequently comply with the constitutional statutes of the Act?
Ask him about the glowing yellow stuff that spilled out of one of the WTC towers. You know, the glowing stuff that the liberal and conservative zionist media gatekeepers want you to ignore.
"Ask him about the glowing yellow stuff that spilled out of one of the WTC towers. You know, the glowing stuff that the liberal and conservative zionist media gatekeepers want you to ignore."
9-11 was an inside job.
"You only have power over people so long as you don't take everything away from them. But when you've robbed a man of everything he's no longer in your power -- he's free again. Alexander Solzhenitsyn
You don't have to repeat yourself. This is forum, not chat, I had to go somewhere and do something and now I am back. Don't hyperventilate on me, please.
"You only have power over people so long as you don't take everything away from them. But when you've robbed a man of everything he's no longer in your power -- he's free again. Alexander Solzhenitsyn
I've knocked both sides but it gets awfully boring after a few months..... unless one is into exploiting pure zionist politics as a tool to divide people.
I am not anti-Semitic just because I do not like Zionism.
One thing you have to deal with is racism and anti-Semitic sentiments cheapen the fabric of any forum or even any dialog.
I respect the First Amendment and freedom of religion, or not to have one, and I support human right regardless of where someone's ancestors or the person came from or what color they are.
You seem more concerned with making the false flag operations Zionist in nature then in getting across to people what really happened.
My priorities are let's get it validated that September 11th 2001 was a day we killed our own for political gain before using it to beat Israel over the head with it.
"You only have power over people so long as you don't take everything away from them. But when you've robbed a man of everything he's no longer in your power -- he's free again. Alexander Solzhenitsyn
"Not a zionist inside job too?" I am not anti-Semitic just because I do not like Zionism.
Look, you unclever undercover zionist retard piece of shit coverup clown, you've turned a simple question into an excuse to smear me instead of giving zionists credit for their inside job. Good work, asshole.
Me hyperventilate over an Obama cultist, who has taken a FReeper-Bush position on Afghanistan, with one exception; they claim to buy into the war on terror, whereas you have offered no reason whatsoever for the slaughter of innocent people. No hyperventilation here, just a firm conviction you're vapid war monger.
You seem more concerned with making the false flag operations Zionist in nature then in getting across to people what really happened.
You're insinuating the official 9/11 false flaggers are not zionist in nature and their aim was not a zionist aim, and that's zionist bullshit. You're also suggesting it was a non-zionist inside job, and that's bigger zionist bullshit.
If you want to suggest that the US and zionism have common fates and cannot be separated in that way, you're just another war-happy profiteering zionist patriot supremacist retarded piece of crap.
I'd wouldn't vote for any known candidate out there in any party you ever heard of, because they're all walking shitbags, unless someone gets the drop on me and holds a gun to my head.
The 9/11 cover-up involved collaboration between the CIA, Israel, and the Saudis. There was an Israeli angle (Mossad Agents posing as art students high- fived when the twin towers fell), but that was far from the only interest involved. For example, after 9/11, the only non-military planes in the air were taking Saudis home, where these former Bush business associates would be safe from interrogation.
.... and nobody told the uber-zionist Rotshield-Rockefeller-Mellonballs first, did they...
PNAC pukestains. Masonic belly-button soup. Jesuit toecheese. Feed me more useless well-known shit. Yes, a veritable hurricane of stench, all circling about a wholly-optional familial core of ancient supremacist talmudic satan- worshipping pseudo-religious ass-jelly. Right, now beam me the fuck up, Magellan.
"I repeat, what have the occupants of this nation done to us?"
Who said they did anything to us? I sure did not.
Conversely, what did you do to anyone to have to go out and oppress, occupy and enslave the people of your city of employment as part of the evil police?
You are playing, "So tell me, how long have you beaten your wife" games with me.
I make clear I support providing military aid that includes training and participation in operations by U.S. military cadre in brush fire wars that low intensity conflict is.
I also support conventionals being deployed to support this effort, as any military operation has a head to tail ratio to it where combat arms needs support units to handle the logistical chores of any operation.
We are there ostensibly to aid that country achieve stability and to get back on a sound social and economic footing. There is not a thing wrong with doing so.
Under President Obama we should have the cool heads and smarts to analyze the situation and alter the deployment based on how what is happening there is sized up.
Under President McCain, we have more of the same as we do with Bush and Cheney, a gutting of the prerogatives and mechanisms of Congress to reel in and alter or halt inappropriate military operations.
We are going to get one or the other as president JT. And we also are not going to suddenly become isolationists unwilling to provide training and material support to friends and allies who are dealing with insurgencies.
I fully agree more teeth and will to act should exist in Congress regarding the oversight of war making. The U.S. Constitution insists this be so, and we need to remember the wisdom of the Founding Fathers in instituting this check and balance regarding war making.
We need a return to Congress as the agency that rules on war making. You have no argument from me about that whatsoever. But I have to agree with Barack Obama that to unconditionally withdraw from Afghanistan is to throw the baby out with the bath water.
Our mission there should be stabilization and training only, and I support Obama as the best man to remember and honor the fact that the military is not in existence merely top destroy and oppress; it is a there also to build and empower.
In this unit crest, along with the crossed arrows denoting unconventional warfare, and the De Oppresso Liber motto is the sword of righteousness which is also on the 'electric butter knife' shoulder patch of most S.F. units.
It means something. And it is to that meaning I am still dedicated as a former member of the United States Armed Forces.
"You only have power over people so long as you don't take everything away from them. But when you've robbed a man of everything he's no longer in your power -- he's free again. Alexander Solzhenitsyn
"Look, you unclever undercover zionist retard piece of shit coverup clown, you've turned a simple question into an excuse to smear me instead of giving zionists credit for their inside job. Good work, asshole."
Seems to me you are the one here engaged in ad hominem attack. I said nothing about you personally, I gave opinion concerning the false flag operations on September 11th.
I do not support what Israel is doing to the Palestinian people, and I support showing them the door to anymore aid or support until they change their ways. And if this means changing the very nature and make-up of what Israel is as well as how they do business, that is fine by me too.
How this makes me a Zionist is beyond me. ;-)
"You only have power over people so long as you don't take everything away from them. But when you've robbed a man of everything he's no longer in your power -- he's free again. Alexander Solzhenitsyn
For example, after 9/11, the only non-military planes in the air were taking Saudis home, where these former Bush business associates would be safe from interrogation.
Ah, so Bush got naughty on all the most elite zionists (you can't be an elite in the US unless a zionist, by the way) post-9/11 with his treatment of the Saudis did he? .... AND THESE (NECESSARILY) ZIONISTS, THE ONLY ONES THAT COUNT, THE ONES WE ALL KNOW AND LOVE, THE ELITE WAR PROFITEERS, THEY JUST SAW MONEY, NOT ZIONISM, AS THE GOAL? Blinded by th' ol' cashola, they were, eh? Guess they owe someone or two a donation, huh? My guess is politicians (necessarily zionist in the US if you want to get elected) and other true-believer religious zionists will get a good lot. At least Bush blamed it on a bunch of Saudis (your taxpayer dollars at work sending the required hush-money to the Saudis, no doubt).
Just one more question. Isn't this almost stupid enough for Fox?
"You're insinuating the official 9/11 false flaggers are not zionist in nature..."
Actually, personally I do not doubt Zionism and our support of it is an element that made it all possible for those doing 9-11 to dare do what they did.
However, someone with the eye on the prize of jumping the obstacles thrown in the way of informing the public of the true nature of 9-11 does not muddy the water with making such an bald attack on Zionism.
All you do is turn some people of who might otherwise be receptive to the message, and give opponents a strong means to further belittle and dismiss what happened as an el Qaeda attack that was not groomed and used to cover-up false flag operations.
"You only have power over people so long as you don't take everything away from them. But when you've robbed a man of everything he's no longer in your power -- he's free again. Alexander Solzhenitsyn
Actually, personally I do not doubt Zionism and our support of it is an element that made it all possible for those doing 9-11 to dare do what they did.
Dude, you cannot continue to backtrack on me and tell me you're about moving forward. That bit hardly explains you pulling out the the smelly old "anti- semite" smear.
You ever heard about Harken Oil and Arbusto (George W's oil companies that barely drilled a single drop of oil but made him a multimillionaire nevertheless)? It was a money laundering operation for Saudis, with whom the Bush family has long had business relations. Just like China, which Daddy Bush gave Most Favored Nation trade status after Tiananmen to keep his brother's investments there safe.
"Well jeez...but...but....you said you supported military intervention in Afghanistan???"
I do not support a general invasion and conquest of Afghanistan. I do support giving them the means to establish domestic tranquility and to provide for the common welfare.
At this point in their history I sure don't see how this can be done without help in building the security and defense infrastructure that allows this to happen..
So yes, I see a defensible and rational role elements of SOCOM and those supporting Special Operations Command in helping build something that is necessary to establish a healthy, thriving and peaceful nation there.
"Why would you take this position if they haven't done anything to us???"
Did Operation Overlord happen because France did something to us? Think that maybe France might of been happy to see D-Day come?
With all due respect, perhaps it is you who has the problem visualizing the mission of the military there as training and building, not oppressing and destroying, not me.
"I suspect it's b/c you're an Obama cultist, and in your case, you support him b/c of white guilt related to wacky liberal politics."
Except I have no sense of 'white guilt,' I would never have gone into the military, would not own firearms, would be for abortion, and would accept other trappings of classic liberal dogma if I were a cultist or a liberal of the stripe you broad brush me as being here.
I disagree with Obama on abortion and regarding firearms, but then again, I would support Ron Paul over him despite Obama being far closer to many more of my personal political views then the Senator from Illinois is.
You see JT, I know full well I am never going to - or would really want for that matter - a candidate with whom I agree fully on every issue out there.
I submit that even if Obama were so anti-gun and pro abortion that's all he could talk about or act on, public opinion and Congress would hold him in check.
I see him as a man, not a black man, not a half black or half white man, and I see him as having human flaws and as much feet of clay as any other imperfect human being.
I find this buzz phrase you are fond of using amusing. But as I know it is election rhetoric meant to cheapen and belittle how and why people such as myself decide to vote for Barack Obama, I am not bothered by it, just amused.
"You only have power over people so long as you don't take everything away from them. But when you've robbed a man of everything he's no longer in your power -- he's free again. Alexander Solzhenitsyn
"Dude, you cannot continue to backtrack on me and tell me you're about moving forward. That bit hardly explains you pulling out the the smelly old "anti- semite" smear."
Dude, thanks for calming down a wee bit, I was truly afraid you were hyperventilating into a panic attack. ;-)
"You only have power over people so long as you don't take everything away from them. But when you've robbed a man of everything he's no longer in your power -- he's free again. Alexander Solzhenitsyn
Every body, LISTEN UP!!!!! nobody here is anti-Zionist, but this does not mean he is anti-Semitic in anyway.
There, is that better? I am not out to attack your character in anyway or assign to you any believes you do not truly hold dear in any way.
"You only have power over people so long as you don't take everything away from them. But when you've robbed a man of everything he's no longer in your power -- he's free again. Alexander Solzhenitsyn
I do support giving them the means to establish domestic tranquility and to provide for the common welfare.
Ah, nation building.....but who invited us, and what about the art of diplomacy? Isn't that Obama's solution to Iran? Why not here? And wouldn't a little domestic tranquility be a nice thing to establish in Harlem, New Orleans or South Central LA? Why in Afghanistan before America First? And how much will this cost? Shall we put it on the tab for future generations, or simply print FRNs?
Good post, but it is 10:45 AM here PDT and I have to do let my mundane little old life interfer with my world saving chore as an interlocutor here once more. (Life is so unfair, ain't it?) ;-D
I will be back as soon as I can to respond, so don't fret. I actually do care about responding to this.
Thanks for the discussion and dialog now going on in here, it is very much appreciated.
"You only have power over people so long as you don't take everything away from them. But when you've robbed a man of everything he's no longer in your power -- he's free again. Alexander Solzhenitsyn
I have no love for Israel and I hate its US lobbies (AIPAC, ADL), but what I can't stand even more are people who shout "Zionist," "Jew" or "Jew tool" at everyone and anyone who suggests that not every problem in the world is caused solely and uniquely by Jews and Israel.
Lookee pal, were the 9/11 attacks a zionist inside job or not?
If you want to take solace in the notion that you have to be zionist anyway to be a successful prominent person in the US, then that's your choice.
If you want to believe that makes the zionism incidental to all this, then sorry to hear about your loss of olfactory sensation. Maybe someone will prey for you.
Don't you, magic Jesus, and the sulfurous zogmedia expect the colors of blackbody temperatures to change, though.
Both the Zionist extremists (Jewish neocons and Christian Rapture Cultists) and their one-note opponents have one thing in common. If you don't agree with every word on their side, you must be 100% on the other. If you disagree with a Zionist, you're an "anti-Semite," if you disagree with the Jew-obsessed, you're a "Zionist stooge."
Just like how Bushbots think that any criticism of their hero makes you a "liberal Democrat" and the Obamaites think that any criticism of their Messiah makes you a "McCain supporter." Don't I have the right not to like either?
End result is the distraction of discussion onto sidebars, tangents and deadends.
All coming from the zionists.
The point is simple, zionists are shitstains.
That's leaving out that they're nepotistic moneygrubbing greedy overcontrolling murderous contrived supremacist global-population-conscious globalist shitstains, as much as you may like to kiss their asses for their might.
Zionists were being perfect little necessarily-screw-the-US-people zionists when they did the 9/11 zionist inside job, except they fucked up and some thermite spill was seen, among other things.
End of story, zionist apologists. That includes Mr. non-zionist inside job backtracker.
Here we go again. You follow the same old brilliant-but-worn-out bullshit zionist formula to stop the ugly antizionist complaining about the zionist 9/11 inside job. This place is full of you zionist apologist assholes.
Eat it from me all day and night, zionist. Eat the complaining about murderous rich zionist assholes. Pretend your delicate ears can't take accurate comparisons of zionists with shit.
