Title: Brother, beware of white girls who look like this Source:
underprivilegedJournalism URL Source:http://underprivilegedjournalism.wordpress.com/ Published:Aug 18, 2008 Author:underprivilegedJournalism Post Date:2008-08-18 09:22:44 by Jethro Tull Keywords:None Views:1754 Comments:166
Poster Comment:
I see, black on white rape is the fault of the white girl....
For example, after 9/11, the only non-military planes in the air were taking Saudis home, where these former Bush business associates would be safe from interrogation.
Ah, so Bush got naughty on all the most elite zionists (you can't be an elite in the US unless a zionist, by the way) post-9/11 with his treatment of the Saudis did he? .... AND THESE (NECESSARILY) ZIONISTS, THE ONLY ONES THAT COUNT, THE ONES WE ALL KNOW AND LOVE, THE ELITE WAR PROFITEERS, THEY JUST SAW MONEY, NOT ZIONISM, AS THE GOAL? Blinded by th' ol' cashola, they were, eh? Guess they owe someone or two a donation, huh? My guess is politicians (necessarily zionist in the US if you want to get elected) and other true-believer religious zionists will get a good lot. At least Bush blamed it on a bunch of Saudis (your taxpayer dollars at work sending the required hush-money to the Saudis, no doubt).
Just one more question. Isn't this almost stupid enough for Fox?
"You're insinuating the official 9/11 false flaggers are not zionist in nature..."
Actually, personally I do not doubt Zionism and our support of it is an element that made it all possible for those doing 9-11 to dare do what they did.
However, someone with the eye on the prize of jumping the obstacles thrown in the way of informing the public of the true nature of 9-11 does not muddy the water with making such an bald attack on Zionism.
All you do is turn some people of who might otherwise be receptive to the message, and give opponents a strong means to further belittle and dismiss what happened as an el Qaeda attack that was not groomed and used to cover-up false flag operations.
"You only have power over people so long as you don't take everything away from them. But when you've robbed a man of everything he's no longer in your power -- he's free again. Alexander Solzhenitsyn
Actually, personally I do not doubt Zionism and our support of it is an element that made it all possible for those doing 9-11 to dare do what they did.
Dude, you cannot continue to backtrack on me and tell me you're about moving forward. That bit hardly explains you pulling out the the smelly old "anti- semite" smear.
You ever heard about Harken Oil and Arbusto (George W's oil companies that barely drilled a single drop of oil but made him a multimillionaire nevertheless)? It was a money laundering operation for Saudis, with whom the Bush family has long had business relations. Just like China, which Daddy Bush gave Most Favored Nation trade status after Tiananmen to keep his brother's investments there safe.
"Well jeez...but...but....you said you supported military intervention in Afghanistan???"
I do not support a general invasion and conquest of Afghanistan. I do support giving them the means to establish domestic tranquility and to provide for the common welfare.
At this point in their history I sure don't see how this can be done without help in building the security and defense infrastructure that allows this to happen..
So yes, I see a defensible and rational role elements of SOCOM and those supporting Special Operations Command in helping build something that is necessary to establish a healthy, thriving and peaceful nation there.
"Why would you take this position if they haven't done anything to us???"
Did Operation Overlord happen because France did something to us? Think that maybe France might of been happy to see D-Day come?
With all due respect, perhaps it is you who has the problem visualizing the mission of the military there as training and building, not oppressing and destroying, not me.
"I suspect it's b/c you're an Obama cultist, and in your case, you support him b/c of white guilt related to wacky liberal politics."
Except I have no sense of 'white guilt,' I would never have gone into the military, would not own firearms, would be for abortion, and would accept other trappings of classic liberal dogma if I were a cultist or a liberal of the stripe you broad brush me as being here.
I disagree with Obama on abortion and regarding firearms, but then again, I would support Ron Paul over him despite Obama being far closer to many more of my personal political views then the Senator from Illinois is.
You see JT, I know full well I am never going to - or would really want for that matter - a candidate with whom I agree fully on every issue out there.
I submit that even if Obama were so anti-gun and pro abortion that's all he could talk about or act on, public opinion and Congress would hold him in check.
I see him as a man, not a black man, not a half black or half white man, and I see him as having human flaws and as much feet of clay as any other imperfect human being.
I find this buzz phrase you are fond of using amusing. But as I know it is election rhetoric meant to cheapen and belittle how and why people such as myself decide to vote for Barack Obama, I am not bothered by it, just amused.
"You only have power over people so long as you don't take everything away from them. But when you've robbed a man of everything he's no longer in your power -- he's free again. Alexander Solzhenitsyn
"Dude, you cannot continue to backtrack on me and tell me you're about moving forward. That bit hardly explains you pulling out the the smelly old "anti- semite" smear."
Dude, thanks for calming down a wee bit, I was truly afraid you were hyperventilating into a panic attack. ;-)
"You only have power over people so long as you don't take everything away from them. But when you've robbed a man of everything he's no longer in your power -- he's free again. Alexander Solzhenitsyn
Every body, LISTEN UP!!!!! nobody here is anti-Zionist, but this does not mean he is anti-Semitic in anyway.
There, is that better? I am not out to attack your character in anyway or assign to you any believes you do not truly hold dear in any way.
"You only have power over people so long as you don't take everything away from them. But when you've robbed a man of everything he's no longer in your power -- he's free again. Alexander Solzhenitsyn
I do support giving them the means to establish domestic tranquility and to provide for the common welfare.
Ah, nation building.....but who invited us, and what about the art of diplomacy? Isn't that Obama's solution to Iran? Why not here? And wouldn't a little domestic tranquility be a nice thing to establish in Harlem, New Orleans or South Central LA? Why in Afghanistan before America First? And how much will this cost? Shall we put it on the tab for future generations, or simply print FRNs?
Good post, but it is 10:45 AM here PDT and I have to do let my mundane little old life interfer with my world saving chore as an interlocutor here once more. (Life is so unfair, ain't it?) ;-D
I will be back as soon as I can to respond, so don't fret. I actually do care about responding to this.
Thanks for the discussion and dialog now going on in here, it is very much appreciated.
"You only have power over people so long as you don't take everything away from them. But when you've robbed a man of everything he's no longer in your power -- he's free again. Alexander Solzhenitsyn
I have no love for Israel and I hate its US lobbies (AIPAC, ADL), but what I can't stand even more are people who shout "Zionist," "Jew" or "Jew tool" at everyone and anyone who suggests that not every problem in the world is caused solely and uniquely by Jews and Israel.
Lookee pal, were the 9/11 attacks a zionist inside job or not?
If you want to take solace in the notion that you have to be zionist anyway to be a successful prominent person in the US, then that's your choice.
If you want to believe that makes the zionism incidental to all this, then sorry to hear about your loss of olfactory sensation. Maybe someone will prey for you.
Don't you, magic Jesus, and the sulfurous zogmedia expect the colors of blackbody temperatures to change, though.
Both the Zionist extremists (Jewish neocons and Christian Rapture Cultists) and their one-note opponents have one thing in common. If you don't agree with every word on their side, you must be 100% on the other. If you disagree with a Zionist, you're an "anti-Semite," if you disagree with the Jew-obsessed, you're a "Zionist stooge."
Just like how Bushbots think that any criticism of their hero makes you a "liberal Democrat" and the Obamaites think that any criticism of their Messiah makes you a "McCain supporter." Don't I have the right not to like either?
End result is the distraction of discussion onto sidebars, tangents and deadends.
All coming from the zionists.
The point is simple, zionists are shitstains.
That's leaving out that they're nepotistic moneygrubbing greedy overcontrolling murderous contrived supremacist global-population-conscious globalist shitstains, as much as you may like to kiss their asses for their might.
Zionists were being perfect little necessarily-screw-the-US-people zionists when they did the 9/11 zionist inside job, except they fucked up and some thermite spill was seen, among other things.
End of story, zionist apologists. That includes Mr. non-zionist inside job backtracker.
Here we go again. You follow the same old brilliant-but-worn-out bullshit zionist formula to stop the ugly antizionist complaining about the zionist 9/11 inside job. This place is full of you zionist apologist assholes.
Eat it from me all day and night, zionist. Eat the complaining about murderous rich zionist assholes. Pretend your delicate ears can't take accurate comparisons of zionists with shit.
Yeah, it was when you insinuated that knowing the essential shit-filled nature of zionism is some kind of "inside" knowledge when it's actually as plain as the zionist apologist olfactory zit on your face.
I'm actually shtupping every zionist right now, with a yellow-hot poker. So far you're the only one to complain. Well, maybe that leaves out bumpkin and adl- reflex boy. Guess nobody wants to talk radiative spectra and potential chemical compositions of yellow-glowing flux with me anymore.
"Only a zionist would call someone an antisemite for noting that 9/11 was necessarily a zionist inside job."
I said I was not anti-Semitic. I said nothing about you being that. You infer that I did, and this is your problem, not mine.
"You only have power over people so long as you don't take everything away from them. But when you've robbed a man of everything he's no longer in your power -- he's free again. Alexander Solzhenitsyn
What is with this guy anyway? I see he's working hard to win friends and influence people in here.
He isn't anti-Semitic, he seems to be just anti anyone he wants to poke with a fire hardened stick.
"You only have power over people so long as you don't take everything away from them. But when you've robbed a man of everything he's no longer in your power -- he's free again. Alexander Solzhenitsyn
"You only have power over people so long as you don't take everything away from them. But when you've robbed a man of everything he's no longer in your power -- he's free again. Alexander Solzhenitsyn
Under President Obama we should have the cool heads and smarts to analyze the situation and alter the deployment based on how what is happening there is sized up...and I support Obama as the best man to remember and honor the fact that the military is not in existence merely top destroy and oppress; it is a there also to build and empower.
In this unit crest, along with the crossed arrows denoting unconventional warfare, and the De Oppresso Liber motto is the sword of righteousness which is also on the 'electric butter knife' shoulder patch of most S.F. units.
It means something. And it is to that meaning I am still dedicated as a former member of the United States Armed Forces.
SF sure has become sterile and politically correct (and Obamaesque) since I served 40 years ago.
SF always served the CIA, but now they do the bidding of Mossad/Israel, under cover of democratic imperialism and ridding the Mid-East of all those evil new Hitlers.
Ferret Mike:...I support Obama as the best man to remember and honor the fact that the military is not in existence merely top destroy and oppress; it is a there also to build and empower.
Hypocrisy Cop: SF always served the CIA, but now they do the bidding of Mossad/Israel, under cover of democratic imperialism and ridding the Mid-East of all those evil new Hitlers.
I'm a non-military taxpayer and both of your remarks are rather troubling to me.
Ferret Mike, why should US Armed Forces be used "for build and empower"? Silly me, I always believed my taxes supported the USAF to defend America. When did the Constitution call for our military to "build and empower" - I'm assuming you mean nation-building in foreign locations.
Hypocrisy Cop, why are SP "serving" the CIA? The CIA operate with a secret humongous budget and I thought there were many many many CIA agents on the payroll to do whatever the CIA is supposed to do besides wasting a ton of tax money that we are not allowed to know any detail about. Frankly the last thing I would want from a taxpayer's perspective is for the CIA to have any authority over military divisions or operations. The CIA couldn't even accurately identify a Chinese consulate on a map before it was inadvertedly bombed. The CIA is an incompetent bureaucratic morass.
