Title: Brother, beware of white girls who look like this Source:
underprivilegedJournalism URL Source:http://underprivilegedjournalism.wordpress.com/ Published:Aug 18, 2008 Author:underprivilegedJournalism Post Date:2008-08-18 09:22:44 by Jethro Tull Keywords:None Views:1746 Comments:166
Poster Comment:
I see, black on white rape is the fault of the white girl....
"Dude, you cannot continue to backtrack on me and tell me you're about moving forward. That bit hardly explains you pulling out the the smelly old "anti- semite" smear."
Dude, thanks for calming down a wee bit, I was truly afraid you were hyperventilating into a panic attack. ;-)
"You only have power over people so long as you don't take everything away from them. But when you've robbed a man of everything he's no longer in your power -- he's free again. Alexander Solzhenitsyn
Every body, LISTEN UP!!!!! nobody here is anti-Zionist, but this does not mean he is anti-Semitic in anyway.
There, is that better? I am not out to attack your character in anyway or assign to you any believes you do not truly hold dear in any way.
"You only have power over people so long as you don't take everything away from them. But when you've robbed a man of everything he's no longer in your power -- he's free again. Alexander Solzhenitsyn
I do support giving them the means to establish domestic tranquility and to provide for the common welfare.
Ah, nation building.....but who invited us, and what about the art of diplomacy? Isn't that Obama's solution to Iran? Why not here? And wouldn't a little domestic tranquility be a nice thing to establish in Harlem, New Orleans or South Central LA? Why in Afghanistan before America First? And how much will this cost? Shall we put it on the tab for future generations, or simply print FRNs?
Good post, but it is 10:45 AM here PDT and I have to do let my mundane little old life interfer with my world saving chore as an interlocutor here once more. (Life is so unfair, ain't it?) ;-D
I will be back as soon as I can to respond, so don't fret. I actually do care about responding to this.
Thanks for the discussion and dialog now going on in here, it is very much appreciated.
"You only have power over people so long as you don't take everything away from them. But when you've robbed a man of everything he's no longer in your power -- he's free again. Alexander Solzhenitsyn
I have no love for Israel and I hate its US lobbies (AIPAC, ADL), but what I can't stand even more are people who shout "Zionist," "Jew" or "Jew tool" at everyone and anyone who suggests that not every problem in the world is caused solely and uniquely by Jews and Israel.
Lookee pal, were the 9/11 attacks a zionist inside job or not?
If you want to take solace in the notion that you have to be zionist anyway to be a successful prominent person in the US, then that's your choice.
If you want to believe that makes the zionism incidental to all this, then sorry to hear about your loss of olfactory sensation. Maybe someone will prey for you.
Don't you, magic Jesus, and the sulfurous zogmedia expect the colors of blackbody temperatures to change, though.
Both the Zionist extremists (Jewish neocons and Christian Rapture Cultists) and their one-note opponents have one thing in common. If you don't agree with every word on their side, you must be 100% on the other. If you disagree with a Zionist, you're an "anti-Semite," if you disagree with the Jew-obsessed, you're a "Zionist stooge."
Just like how Bushbots think that any criticism of their hero makes you a "liberal Democrat" and the Obamaites think that any criticism of their Messiah makes you a "McCain supporter." Don't I have the right not to like either?
End result is the distraction of discussion onto sidebars, tangents and deadends.
All coming from the zionists.
The point is simple, zionists are shitstains.
That's leaving out that they're nepotistic moneygrubbing greedy overcontrolling murderous contrived supremacist global-population-conscious globalist shitstains, as much as you may like to kiss their asses for their might.
Zionists were being perfect little necessarily-screw-the-US-people zionists when they did the 9/11 zionist inside job, except they fucked up and some thermite spill was seen, among other things.
End of story, zionist apologists. That includes Mr. non-zionist inside job backtracker.
Here we go again. You follow the same old brilliant-but-worn-out bullshit zionist formula to stop the ugly antizionist complaining about the zionist 9/11 inside job. This place is full of you zionist apologist assholes.
Eat it from me all day and night, zionist. Eat the complaining about murderous rich zionist assholes. Pretend your delicate ears can't take accurate comparisons of zionists with shit.
Yeah, it was when you insinuated that knowing the essential shit-filled nature of zionism is some kind of "inside" knowledge when it's actually as plain as the zionist apologist olfactory zit on your face.
I'm actually shtupping every zionist right now, with a yellow-hot poker. So far you're the only one to complain. Well, maybe that leaves out bumpkin and adl- reflex boy. Guess nobody wants to talk radiative spectra and potential chemical compositions of yellow-glowing flux with me anymore.
"Only a zionist would call someone an antisemite for noting that 9/11 was necessarily a zionist inside job."
I said I was not anti-Semitic. I said nothing about you being that. You infer that I did, and this is your problem, not mine.
"You only have power over people so long as you don't take everything away from them. But when you've robbed a man of everything he's no longer in your power -- he's free again. Alexander Solzhenitsyn
What is with this guy anyway? I see he's working hard to win friends and influence people in here.
He isn't anti-Semitic, he seems to be just anti anyone he wants to poke with a fire hardened stick.
"You only have power over people so long as you don't take everything away from them. But when you've robbed a man of everything he's no longer in your power -- he's free again. Alexander Solzhenitsyn
"You only have power over people so long as you don't take everything away from them. But when you've robbed a man of everything he's no longer in your power -- he's free again. Alexander Solzhenitsyn
Under President Obama we should have the cool heads and smarts to analyze the situation and alter the deployment based on how what is happening there is sized up...and I support Obama as the best man to remember and honor the fact that the military is not in existence merely top destroy and oppress; it is a there also to build and empower.
In this unit crest, along with the crossed arrows denoting unconventional warfare, and the De Oppresso Liber motto is the sword of righteousness which is also on the 'electric butter knife' shoulder patch of most S.F. units.
It means something. And it is to that meaning I am still dedicated as a former member of the United States Armed Forces.
SF sure has become sterile and politically correct (and Obamaesque) since I served 40 years ago.
SF always served the CIA, but now they do the bidding of Mossad/Israel, under cover of democratic imperialism and ridding the Mid-East of all those evil new Hitlers.
Ferret Mike:...I support Obama as the best man to remember and honor the fact that the military is not in existence merely top destroy and oppress; it is a there also to build and empower.
Hypocrisy Cop: SF always served the CIA, but now they do the bidding of Mossad/Israel, under cover of democratic imperialism and ridding the Mid-East of all those evil new Hitlers.
I'm a non-military taxpayer and both of your remarks are rather troubling to me.
Ferret Mike, why should US Armed Forces be used "for build and empower"? Silly me, I always believed my taxes supported the USAF to defend America. When did the Constitution call for our military to "build and empower" - I'm assuming you mean nation-building in foreign locations.
Hypocrisy Cop, why are SP "serving" the CIA? The CIA operate with a secret humongous budget and I thought there were many many many CIA agents on the payroll to do whatever the CIA is supposed to do besides wasting a ton of tax money that we are not allowed to know any detail about. Frankly the last thing I would want from a taxpayer's perspective is for the CIA to have any authority over military divisions or operations. The CIA couldn't even accurately identify a Chinese consulate on a map before it was inadvertedly bombed. The CIA is an incompetent bureaucratic morass.
One thing you have to deal with is racism and anti-Semitic sentiments cheapen the fabric of any forum or even any dialog.
Look, you tapdancing backtracking cretin, you're the one who has to "deal with" your inability to answer a simple yes/no question about the zionist 9/11 inside job without lecturing people on the imminent dangers of "anti-semitism," not me.
Hypocrisy Cop, why are SP [sic] "serving" the CIA? The CIA operate with a secret humongous budget and I thought there were many many many CIA agents on the payroll to do whatever the CIA is supposed to do besides wasting a ton of tax money that we are not allowed to know any detail about. Frankly the last thing I would want from a taxpayer's perspective is for the CIA to have any authority over military divisions or operations...The CIA is an incompetent bureaucratic morass.
You won't get any argument out of me, Scrapper, as I share your conclusion about the CIA/Mossad.
When I wrote SF (not SP), that's Special Forces, the U.S. Army's elite "green berets" whose shoulder patch and motto, 'de oppresso libre,' were mentioned.
The "new" SF isn't your daddy's SF. When we were liberating the oppressed South Vietnamese people back in the 1960s we were nearly all White and were likely to have voted for the George Wallace/Curtis "Bombs Away" LeMay ticket in '68, certainly never for a Halfrican-American named Barack Hussein Muhammed Obama. Let's say we hadn't entirely lost our implicit racial consciousness as a nearly homogeneous majority White nation 40 years ago. The U.S. wasn't quite yet the mongrelized, polyglot obomination it is today.
Read up a little on the CIA's Phoenix Program. It was SF personnel doing the dirty deeds for them, under cover of our U.S. Embassies, the USAID program, etc.
Now, I suppose, the CIA can use private armies such as Blackwater Inc. to do its deeds. It's becomming increasingly difficult for SF to retain career personnel with the proliferation of these private forces that recruit almost exclusively from Special Operation Forces, pay much better, and are unaccountable to either military OR civilian justice.
I see, black on white rape is the fault of the white girl....
It didn't take long for this thread about Yakub/Jacobs and inter-racial rape to get way off topic.
Apologies to all for my part in that. Don't blame Sambo for taking Whitey's women. He's merely following Nature's imperative to take what the competing subspecies is willing to give up, without a fight. Sambo is the symptom, Yakub Jacobs the disease.
When I wrote SF (not SP), that's Special Forces, the U.S. Army's elite "green berets" whose shoulder patch and motto, 'de oppresso libre,' were mentioned.
Ooops - my bad typing - I meant to type SF.
Thanks for the referral to John Perkins' book. I'll definitely check into it.
It didn't take long for this thread about Yakub/Jacobs and inter-racial rape to get way off topic.
No apology necessary, HC. Threads that run counter to the PC trade winds usually suffer the same fate, whether intentionally or not. Your contribution is much appreciated.
