Title: Brother, beware of white girls who look like this Source:
underprivilegedJournalism URL Source:http://underprivilegedjournalism.wordpress.com/ Published:Aug 18, 2008 Author:underprivilegedJournalism Post Date:2008-08-18 09:22:44 by Jethro Tull Keywords:None Views:1814 Comments:166
Poster Comment:
I see, black on white rape is the fault of the white girl....
Both the Zionist extremists (Jewish neocons and Christian Rapture Cultists) and their one-note opponents have one thing in common. If you don't agree with every word on their side, you must be 100% on the other. If you disagree with a Zionist, you're an "anti-Semite," if you disagree with the Jew-obsessed, you're a "Zionist stooge."
Just like how Bushbots think that any criticism of their hero makes you a "liberal Democrat" and the Obamaites think that any criticism of their Messiah makes you a "McCain supporter." Don't I have the right not to like either?
End result is the distraction of discussion onto sidebars, tangents and deadends.
All coming from the zionists.
The point is simple, zionists are shitstains.
That's leaving out that they're nepotistic moneygrubbing greedy overcontrolling murderous contrived supremacist global-population-conscious globalist shitstains, as much as you may like to kiss their asses for their might.
Zionists were being perfect little necessarily-screw-the-US-people zionists when they did the 9/11 zionist inside job, except they fucked up and some thermite spill was seen, among other things.
End of story, zionist apologists. That includes Mr. non-zionist inside job backtracker.
Here we go again. You follow the same old brilliant-but-worn-out bullshit zionist formula to stop the ugly antizionist complaining about the zionist 9/11 inside job. This place is full of you zionist apologist assholes.
Eat it from me all day and night, zionist. Eat the complaining about murderous rich zionist assholes. Pretend your delicate ears can't take accurate comparisons of zionists with shit.
Yeah, it was when you insinuated that knowing the essential shit-filled nature of zionism is some kind of "inside" knowledge when it's actually as plain as the zionist apologist olfactory zit on your face.
I'm actually shtupping every zionist right now, with a yellow-hot poker. So far you're the only one to complain. Well, maybe that leaves out bumpkin and adl- reflex boy. Guess nobody wants to talk radiative spectra and potential chemical compositions of yellow-glowing flux with me anymore.
"Only a zionist would call someone an antisemite for noting that 9/11 was necessarily a zionist inside job."
I said I was not anti-Semitic. I said nothing about you being that. You infer that I did, and this is your problem, not mine.
"You only have power over people so long as you don't take everything away from them. But when you've robbed a man of everything he's no longer in your power -- he's free again. Alexander Solzhenitsyn
What is with this guy anyway? I see he's working hard to win friends and influence people in here.
He isn't anti-Semitic, he seems to be just anti anyone he wants to poke with a fire hardened stick.
"You only have power over people so long as you don't take everything away from them. But when you've robbed a man of everything he's no longer in your power -- he's free again. Alexander Solzhenitsyn
"You only have power over people so long as you don't take everything away from them. But when you've robbed a man of everything he's no longer in your power -- he's free again. Alexander Solzhenitsyn
Under President Obama we should have the cool heads and smarts to analyze the situation and alter the deployment based on how what is happening there is sized up...and I support Obama as the best man to remember and honor the fact that the military is not in existence merely top destroy and oppress; it is a there also to build and empower.
In this unit crest, along with the crossed arrows denoting unconventional warfare, and the De Oppresso Liber motto is the sword of righteousness which is also on the 'electric butter knife' shoulder patch of most S.F. units.
It means something. And it is to that meaning I am still dedicated as a former member of the United States Armed Forces.
SF sure has become sterile and politically correct (and Obamaesque) since I served 40 years ago.
SF always served the CIA, but now they do the bidding of Mossad/Israel, under cover of democratic imperialism and ridding the Mid-East of all those evil new Hitlers.
Ferret Mike:...I support Obama as the best man to remember and honor the fact that the military is not in existence merely top destroy and oppress; it is a there also to build and empower.
Hypocrisy Cop: SF always served the CIA, but now they do the bidding of Mossad/Israel, under cover of democratic imperialism and ridding the Mid-East of all those evil new Hitlers.
I'm a non-military taxpayer and both of your remarks are rather troubling to me.
Ferret Mike, why should US Armed Forces be used "for build and empower"? Silly me, I always believed my taxes supported the USAF to defend America. When did the Constitution call for our military to "build and empower" - I'm assuming you mean nation-building in foreign locations.
Hypocrisy Cop, why are SP "serving" the CIA? The CIA operate with a secret humongous budget and I thought there were many many many CIA agents on the payroll to do whatever the CIA is supposed to do besides wasting a ton of tax money that we are not allowed to know any detail about. Frankly the last thing I would want from a taxpayer's perspective is for the CIA to have any authority over military divisions or operations. The CIA couldn't even accurately identify a Chinese consulate on a map before it was inadvertedly bombed. The CIA is an incompetent bureaucratic morass.
One thing you have to deal with is racism and anti-Semitic sentiments cheapen the fabric of any forum or even any dialog.
Look, you tapdancing backtracking cretin, you're the one who has to "deal with" your inability to answer a simple yes/no question about the zionist 9/11 inside job without lecturing people on the imminent dangers of "anti-semitism," not me.
Hypocrisy Cop, why are SP [sic] "serving" the CIA? The CIA operate with a secret humongous budget and I thought there were many many many CIA agents on the payroll to do whatever the CIA is supposed to do besides wasting a ton of tax money that we are not allowed to know any detail about. Frankly the last thing I would want from a taxpayer's perspective is for the CIA to have any authority over military divisions or operations...The CIA is an incompetent bureaucratic morass.
You won't get any argument out of me, Scrapper, as I share your conclusion about the CIA/Mossad.
When I wrote SF (not SP), that's Special Forces, the U.S. Army's elite "green berets" whose shoulder patch and motto, 'de oppresso libre,' were mentioned.
The "new" SF isn't your daddy's SF. When we were liberating the oppressed South Vietnamese people back in the 1960s we were nearly all White and were likely to have voted for the George Wallace/Curtis "Bombs Away" LeMay ticket in '68, certainly never for a Halfrican-American named Barack Hussein Muhammed Obama. Let's say we hadn't entirely lost our implicit racial consciousness as a nearly homogeneous majority White nation 40 years ago. The U.S. wasn't quite yet the mongrelized, polyglot obomination it is today.
Read up a little on the CIA's Phoenix Program. It was SF personnel doing the dirty deeds for them, under cover of our U.S. Embassies, the USAID program, etc.
Now, I suppose, the CIA can use private armies such as Blackwater Inc. to do its deeds. It's becomming increasingly difficult for SF to retain career personnel with the proliferation of these private forces that recruit almost exclusively from Special Operation Forces, pay much better, and are unaccountable to either military OR civilian justice.
I see, black on white rape is the fault of the white girl....
It didn't take long for this thread about Yakub/Jacobs and inter-racial rape to get way off topic.
Apologies to all for my part in that. Don't blame Sambo for taking Whitey's women. He's merely following Nature's imperative to take what the competing subspecies is willing to give up, without a fight. Sambo is the symptom, Yakub Jacobs the disease.
When I wrote SF (not SP), that's Special Forces, the U.S. Army's elite "green berets" whose shoulder patch and motto, 'de oppresso libre,' were mentioned.
Ooops - my bad typing - I meant to type SF.
Thanks for the referral to John Perkins' book. I'll definitely check into it.
It didn't take long for this thread about Yakub/Jacobs and inter-racial rape to get way off topic.
No apology necessary, HC. Threads that run counter to the PC trade winds usually suffer the same fate, whether intentionally or not. Your contribution is much appreciated.
The article was apparently written by zionist nitwits who think they can pull off looking like something else, so how the fuck is talking about lying zionist nitwits and their stooges offtopic here, unless one is a zionist asshole?
Calling people zionist assholes is like saying they watched/read too much TV/newspaper "news" when they grew up. Now zionist assholes are trying to make it look like the internet is the problem, not the MSM, so the zionist assholes rig up internet articles like this.
The other point I wanted to make is that you're just an inept low-IQ race- baiter, which fits the "idiot zionist stooge" profile perfectly.
If you don't agree with every word on their side, you must be 100% on the other. If you disagree with a Zionist, you're an "anti-Semite," if you disagree with the Jew-obsessed, you're a "Zionist stooge."
Revolution requires elimination of the political middle. Both sides do their best to make the middle uninhabitable.
In Africa they do it with machetes, tires, and gasoline.
On what point do revisionist and orthodox historians agree? That the answer to the question is important.
But it is not the answer to the question that is important, it is the asking of it.
When a person can ask it without fear or malice, they are free.
Howard Dean said If you look at folks of color, even women, theyre more successful in the Democratic party than they are in the white, uh, excuse me, in, uh, Republican party.
All-in-all, wasn't the McCain campaign right to pounce on that?
Both sides do their best to make the middle uninhabitable.
The "middle" here is false-flagging zionist nitwit assholes, including the ones who come here and suggest I'm a jew because I complain about mass-murdering zionist assholes and their 9/11 false-flag inside job.
If you don't agree with every word on their side, you must be 100% on the other. If you disagree with a Zionist, you're an "anti-Semite," if you disagree with the Jew-obsessed, you're a "Zionist stooge."
This place is packed solid with zionist assholes pretending to not be zionist assholes, it's THAT FUCKING SIMPLE. For that simple observation, some cocksucker here will no doubt suggest I'm paranoid, whereas it's the paranoia of zionist assholes that actually packs this place with play-acting zionist assholes pretending to be something they aren't.
Is there an actual picture of this fucktard delusion somewhere on the web? Somehow I doubt it. Tried google image search already. I'm going to assume it's the alias for a group effort of ex-door-to-door framed "art" sellers, at least until further data comes in.