Title: Brother, beware of white girls who look like this Source:
underprivilegedJournalism URL Source:http://underprivilegedjournalism.wordpress.com/ Published:Aug 18, 2008 Author:underprivilegedJournalism Post Date:2008-08-18 09:22:44 by Jethro Tull Keywords:None Views:1802 Comments:166
Poster Comment:
I see, black on white rape is the fault of the white girl....
"I guess I'm not understanding the strong feelings against Iraq, yet the bloodlust for Afghanistan."
I guess I don't understand the strong feelings you claim to have for those whose ancestors came from Europe and your feeling that you should not genocidically kill anyone who's ancestors came from Africa unless you do it right.
"You only have power over people so long as you don't take everything away from them. But when you've robbed a man of everything he's no longer in your power -- he's free again. Alexander Solzhenitsyn
More deflection, vis a vis, your blood lust in Afghanistan.
My HIV comment was a comment on Obummer's nutty black pastor, the Rev. Wright. He claimed whites developed HIV in some govt. lab for the purpose of genocide. My remark was a comic reply to his nuttery, which was totally lost on your multicultural-loving ass.
Now, tell me the constitutional authority that guides our military in Afghanistan?
"More deflection, vis a vis, your blood lust in Afghanistan."
Actually if you recall, I made a point at the start of this to ask for your clarification.
I also offered to discuss the war in Afghanistan, and it has turned into you trying to cross examine me with no real input from you other then an imitation of the D.A. cross examining someone on the stand.
If you don't buy the well examined need to give whomever is president the prerogative for some leeway in deploying military in situations like in Afghanistan, tell me why as well ask questions repeatedly as if I am not answering them.
That doesn't cut it with me.
The question was dialogged extensively during the period the War Power Act came into being, and Congress decided to give it when it passed the act.
As I said, I am happy do dialog, but I will not tolerate a cross examining atmosphere like the one you seem to wish to create here.
"You only have power over people so long as you don't take everything away from them. But when you've robbed a man of everything he's no longer in your power -- he's free again. Alexander Solzhenitsyn
"My HIV comment was a comment on Obummer's nutty black pastor, the Rev. Wright. He claimed whites developed HIV in some govt. lab for the purpose of genocide. My remark was a comic reply to his nuttery, which was totally lost on your multicultural-loving ass."
He isn't his pastor, he WAS his pastor. See what I am seeing about your bias?
And your 'remark' clearly stated that if one was to do genocide, one should not do it unless someone does it right.
Then you stonewalled giving any clarification until now.
Taken in the context of all the bait and hate in here directed against Americans of African ethnic origin that happens constantly with such extreme bias and hatred in this forum, it is important when making such a stupid and blood thirsty comment to clarify what in blue blazes you are talking about and why.
"You only have power over people so long as you don't take everything away from them. But when you've robbed a man of everything he's no longer in your power -- he's free again. Alexander Solzhenitsyn
"That's exactly what the apparent black author suggests."
And apparently by posting this thread, you wish to turn a probable black author into a definitely implied to be black author.
Lynching is often fueled by a spike in emotionalism and unwarranted bigotry. Those seeking to create the climate for it often lie or exaggerate to create the climate necessary to make it happen with no consideration given whether that lynching is true justice or not.
I submit you don't give a rat's ass whether it was a black man or woman or group of them who made this ridiculous website. It is only important to you to imply it was and to use shamelessly the emotionalism this causes.
"You only have power over people so long as you don't take everything away from them. But when you've robbed a man of everything he's no longer in your power -- he's free again. Alexander Solzhenitsyn
He isn't his pastor, he WAS his pastor. See what I am seeing
about your bias?
And we know this b/c Obama, a
politician seeking the presidency, says so? I submit he can no more toss the
Rev. Wright, a man who married he and Michelle & baptised his children) under
the bus than he can his own white grandmother. Pardon me, but unlike you I
don't hold his words very seriously. Obama is an acolyte to black liberation
theology as are his fellow Chicago street activists. And isn't it odd how the
racial flacks would tear RP, or any other white candidate a new 'hole for past
associations with groups (a visit to Bob Jones Univ. or the C of C as an
example) but cut Obama a break for his past radical ties? The dual racial
double standard you live by is un-American and divisive.
Still no answer to
the constitutional authorization for war with Afghanistan?
And apparently by posting this thread, you wish to turn a probable black author into a definitely implied to be black author.
It's always best to let the person making the statement say what they meant, rather than for you to ascribe motive. The author is black, and his comment is clear; some white girls are looking for rape by blacks by the way they dress and look. The site I referenced is black owned and operated from all I can tell, if you can prove otherwise, I'll stand corrected.
"I thought only Marines were brainwashed to this degree."
I took an Article 15 to Special Court Martial in 1977 as a member of 1/17th (ABN) Air Cav, 82nd Airborne Division because I am not thusly 'brainwashed.' (I won.)
The charge that I had flipped the U.S. Flag off during an awards ceremony at the 82nd Airborne Division Museum grounds emanated from a desire to give me several legal actions of the non-judicial kind and then to throw me out as unable to adapt to military life.
I then got out in 1980 after making it to the level of crew chief on a UH-1H helicopter making sergeant E-5 in the process because of my skill as a mechanic and crew member.
I discovered Special Forces while at a National Guard NCO school session at Camp Williams, UT. Utah has the first battalion of the 19th Special Forces (National Guard component).
I did not go for demolitions (engineer) or weapons, I went for MOS 18E, Special Operations Communication Sergeant. I was fascinated with the 'Free the Oppressed' (De Oppresso Liber) aspect of SF, and the training and empowerment missions they had.
I am no fan of the 'Rambo' type or any such Hollywood fiction. I joined because I liked the concept of empowering people to better help themselves.
I got out with only nine years active duty, because sadly, there are too many blood thirsty people everywhere in the military who are brain washed for blood as you speak of, and because I found the invasion of Panama to be a contrived for political reasons war.
Because of the nature of the mis-use of the military by neocons like Bush and Cheney, I want the obviously illegal war in Iraq ended, and I want the war in Afghanistan vetted on a Congressional level.
I have thought long and hard on this, and decided long ago that I don't wish to do a knee jerk reaction and act like those starting illegal wars and rashly judge the war in Afghanistan ultimately merely as a political backlash to those turning troops into whores for Halliburton for political reasons.
I know well that low intensity conflict such as that in Afghanistan is hard to judge at face value on what one sees in the media and with no real schooling in just exactly what Guerrilla Warfare is, how it works and why people go there.
Concern about Afghanistan is justified, but I want it clearly and rationally vetted before we quit our military involvement there.
If we can analyze and address the errors made there so far by conventional troops and train and build a stabilizing force that can end the perpetual warfare and cultural fratricide of that conflict so deeply set into that country's socio-political fabric, this is an incredibly great gift we can give the people of this country.
By the way, two terms of endearment for me while in the military were 'Mr. Specific' in Basic Combat Training (BCT) for saying "specifically speaking..." when trying to school a drill sergeant concerning hypothermia during a class on frost bite, frost nip and trench foot, and 'Spock' by my A team because I always used the five dollar word when a 1.17 cent one would do. I was never, ever considered a brainwashed Rambo for good reasons; I'm not.
"You only have power over people so long as you don't take everything away from them. But when you've robbed a man of everything he's no longer in your power -- he's free again. Alexander Solzhenitsyn
"Still no answer to the constitutional authorization for war with Afghanistan?"
I responded to this, you just choose not to take up the thread of that response. This is your prerogative, but don't whine to me about your own intellectual dishonesty.
Congress in passing the War Powers Act of 1972 acknowledged the need to grant leeway in the deployment of military assets prior to any Congressional approval for them.
That was Congress' prerogative to do, and the Constitution grants them this prerogative because it does not forbid such measures based on the changing nature over time of which things as how warfare is waged.
There is a definite problem with the Commander in Chief not abiding by the need to get this deployment vetted by Congress, thus I do acknowledge the need for Congress to rule on out involvement in Afghanistan.
What I am seeing here is you don't wish to discuss this, as it suits your own political agenda to ignore my words and to play DA with me.
That is why we are apparently at an impasse here with no real discussion happening.
And I have been doing most the talking and getting only clipped and unfriendly cross examination that ignores what I am saying.
"You only have power over people so long as you don't take everything away from them. But when you've robbed a man of everything he's no longer in your power -- he's free again. Alexander Solzhenitsyn
Anyway, this article looks like something that obviously a joker wrote and I'm not surprised if two people on opposite ends of the racially-opinionated-communicative spectrum would only seriously consider other possibilities.
It is irrational once you've realized that the so-called choice between establishment Democrats and establishment Republicans is a big scam. Which takes about the same amount of thought to figure out as realizing that Pro Wrestling is fake.
Congress in passing the War Powers Act of 1972 acknowledged the need to grant leeway in the deployment of military assets prior to any Congressional approval for them.
Helloooooooooo..........
Did he subsequently comply with the constitutional statutes of the Act?
Ask him about the glowing yellow stuff that spilled out of one of the WTC towers. You know, the glowing stuff that the liberal and conservative zionist media gatekeepers want you to ignore.
"Ask him about the glowing yellow stuff that spilled out of one of the WTC towers. You know, the glowing stuff that the liberal and conservative zionist media gatekeepers want you to ignore."
9-11 was an inside job.
"You only have power over people so long as you don't take everything away from them. But when you've robbed a man of everything he's no longer in your power -- he's free again. Alexander Solzhenitsyn
You don't have to repeat yourself. This is forum, not chat, I had to go somewhere and do something and now I am back. Don't hyperventilate on me, please.
"You only have power over people so long as you don't take everything away from them. But when you've robbed a man of everything he's no longer in your power -- he's free again. Alexander Solzhenitsyn
I've knocked both sides but it gets awfully boring after a few months..... unless one is into exploiting pure zionist politics as a tool to divide people.
I am not anti-Semitic just because I do not like Zionism.
One thing you have to deal with is racism and anti-Semitic sentiments cheapen the fabric of any forum or even any dialog.
I respect the First Amendment and freedom of religion, or not to have one, and I support human right regardless of where someone's ancestors or the person came from or what color they are.
You seem more concerned with making the false flag operations Zionist in nature then in getting across to people what really happened.
My priorities are let's get it validated that September 11th 2001 was a day we killed our own for political gain before using it to beat Israel over the head with it.
"You only have power over people so long as you don't take everything away from them. But when you've robbed a man of everything he's no longer in your power -- he's free again. Alexander Solzhenitsyn
"Not a zionist inside job too?" I am not anti-Semitic just because I do not like Zionism.
Look, you unclever undercover zionist retard piece of shit coverup clown, you've turned a simple question into an excuse to smear me instead of giving zionists credit for their inside job. Good work, asshole.
Me hyperventilate over an Obama cultist, who has taken a FReeper-Bush position on Afghanistan, with one exception; they claim to buy into the war on terror, whereas you have offered no reason whatsoever for the slaughter of innocent people. No hyperventilation here, just a firm conviction you're vapid war monger.
You seem more concerned with making the false flag operations Zionist in nature then in getting across to people what really happened.
You're insinuating the official 9/11 false flaggers are not zionist in nature and their aim was not a zionist aim, and that's zionist bullshit. You're also suggesting it was a non-zionist inside job, and that's bigger zionist bullshit.
If you want to suggest that the US and zionism have common fates and cannot be separated in that way, you're just another war-happy profiteering zionist patriot supremacist retarded piece of crap.
I'd wouldn't vote for any known candidate out there in any party you ever heard of, because they're all walking shitbags, unless someone gets the drop on me and holds a gun to my head.
The 9/11 cover-up involved collaboration between the CIA, Israel, and the Saudis. There was an Israeli angle (Mossad Agents posing as art students high- fived when the twin towers fell), but that was far from the only interest involved. For example, after 9/11, the only non-military planes in the air were taking Saudis home, where these former Bush business associates would be safe from interrogation.
.... and nobody told the uber-zionist Rotshield-Rockefeller-Mellonballs first, did they...
PNAC pukestains. Masonic belly-button soup. Jesuit toecheese. Feed me more useless well-known shit. Yes, a veritable hurricane of stench, all circling about a wholly-optional familial core of ancient supremacist talmudic satan- worshipping pseudo-religious ass-jelly. Right, now beam me the fuck up, Magellan.
"I repeat, what have the occupants of this nation done to us?"
Who said they did anything to us? I sure did not.
Conversely, what did you do to anyone to have to go out and oppress, occupy and enslave the people of your city of employment as part of the evil police?
You are playing, "So tell me, how long have you beaten your wife" games with me.
I make clear I support providing military aid that includes training and participation in operations by U.S. military cadre in brush fire wars that low intensity conflict is.
I also support conventionals being deployed to support this effort, as any military operation has a head to tail ratio to it where combat arms needs support units to handle the logistical chores of any operation.
We are there ostensibly to aid that country achieve stability and to get back on a sound social and economic footing. There is not a thing wrong with doing so.
Under President Obama we should have the cool heads and smarts to analyze the situation and alter the deployment based on how what is happening there is sized up.
Under President McCain, we have more of the same as we do with Bush and Cheney, a gutting of the prerogatives and mechanisms of Congress to reel in and alter or halt inappropriate military operations.
We are going to get one or the other as president JT. And we also are not going to suddenly become isolationists unwilling to provide training and material support to friends and allies who are dealing with insurgencies.
I fully agree more teeth and will to act should exist in Congress regarding the oversight of war making. The U.S. Constitution insists this be so, and we need to remember the wisdom of the Founding Fathers in instituting this check and balance regarding war making.
We need a return to Congress as the agency that rules on war making. You have no argument from me about that whatsoever. But I have to agree with Barack Obama that to unconditionally withdraw from Afghanistan is to throw the baby out with the bath water.
Our mission there should be stabilization and training only, and I support Obama as the best man to remember and honor the fact that the military is not in existence merely top destroy and oppress; it is a there also to build and empower.
In this unit crest, along with the crossed arrows denoting unconventional warfare, and the De Oppresso Liber motto is the sword of righteousness which is also on the 'electric butter knife' shoulder patch of most S.F. units.
It means something. And it is to that meaning I am still dedicated as a former member of the United States Armed Forces.
"You only have power over people so long as you don't take everything away from them. But when you've robbed a man of everything he's no longer in your power -- he's free again. Alexander Solzhenitsyn
"Look, you unclever undercover zionist retard piece of shit coverup clown, you've turned a simple question into an excuse to smear me instead of giving zionists credit for their inside job. Good work, asshole."
Seems to me you are the one here engaged in ad hominem attack. I said nothing about you personally, I gave opinion concerning the false flag operations on September 11th.
I do not support what Israel is doing to the Palestinian people, and I support showing them the door to anymore aid or support until they change their ways. And if this means changing the very nature and make-up of what Israel is as well as how they do business, that is fine by me too.
How this makes me a Zionist is beyond me. ;-)
"You only have power over people so long as you don't take everything away from them. But when you've robbed a man of everything he's no longer in your power -- he's free again. Alexander Solzhenitsyn
For example, after 9/11, the only non-military planes in the air were taking Saudis home, where these former Bush business associates would be safe from interrogation.
Ah, so Bush got naughty on all the most elite zionists (you can't be an elite in the US unless a zionist, by the way) post-9/11 with his treatment of the Saudis did he? .... AND THESE (NECESSARILY) ZIONISTS, THE ONLY ONES THAT COUNT, THE ONES WE ALL KNOW AND LOVE, THE ELITE WAR PROFITEERS, THEY JUST SAW MONEY, NOT ZIONISM, AS THE GOAL? Blinded by th' ol' cashola, they were, eh? Guess they owe someone or two a donation, huh? My guess is politicians (necessarily zionist in the US if you want to get elected) and other true-believer religious zionists will get a good lot. At least Bush blamed it on a bunch of Saudis (your taxpayer dollars at work sending the required hush-money to the Saudis, no doubt).
Just one more question. Isn't this almost stupid enough for Fox?
"You're insinuating the official 9/11 false flaggers are not zionist in nature..."
Actually, personally I do not doubt Zionism and our support of it is an element that made it all possible for those doing 9-11 to dare do what they did.
However, someone with the eye on the prize of jumping the obstacles thrown in the way of informing the public of the true nature of 9-11 does not muddy the water with making such an bald attack on Zionism.
All you do is turn some people of who might otherwise be receptive to the message, and give opponents a strong means to further belittle and dismiss what happened as an el Qaeda attack that was not groomed and used to cover-up false flag operations.
"You only have power over people so long as you don't take everything away from them. But when you've robbed a man of everything he's no longer in your power -- he's free again. Alexander Solzhenitsyn
Actually, personally I do not doubt Zionism and our support of it is an element that made it all possible for those doing 9-11 to dare do what they did.
Dude, you cannot continue to backtrack on me and tell me you're about moving forward. That bit hardly explains you pulling out the the smelly old "anti- semite" smear.
You ever heard about Harken Oil and Arbusto (George W's oil companies that barely drilled a single drop of oil but made him a multimillionaire nevertheless)? It was a money laundering operation for Saudis, with whom the Bush family has long had business relations. Just like China, which Daddy Bush gave Most Favored Nation trade status after Tiananmen to keep his brother's investments there safe.
