Title: Brother, beware of white girls who look like this Source:
underprivilegedJournalism URL Source:http://underprivilegedjournalism.wordpress.com/ Published:Aug 18, 2008 Author:underprivilegedJournalism Post Date:2008-08-18 09:22:44 by Jethro Tull Keywords:None Views:1676 Comments:166
Poster Comment:
I see, black on white rape is the fault of the white girl....
Yeah, it was when you insinuated that knowing the essential shit-filled nature of zionism is some kind of "inside" knowledge when it's actually as plain as the zionist apologist olfactory zit on your face.
I'm actually shtupping every zionist right now, with a yellow-hot poker. So far you're the only one to complain. Well, maybe that leaves out bumpkin and adl- reflex boy. Guess nobody wants to talk radiative spectra and potential chemical compositions of yellow-glowing flux with me anymore.
"Only a zionist would call someone an antisemite for noting that 9/11 was necessarily a zionist inside job."
I said I was not anti-Semitic. I said nothing about you being that. You infer that I did, and this is your problem, not mine.
"You only have power over people so long as you don't take everything away from them. But when you've robbed a man of everything he's no longer in your power -- he's free again. Alexander Solzhenitsyn
What is with this guy anyway? I see he's working hard to win friends and influence people in here.
He isn't anti-Semitic, he seems to be just anti anyone he wants to poke with a fire hardened stick.
"You only have power over people so long as you don't take everything away from them. But when you've robbed a man of everything he's no longer in your power -- he's free again. Alexander Solzhenitsyn
"You only have power over people so long as you don't take everything away from them. But when you've robbed a man of everything he's no longer in your power -- he's free again. Alexander Solzhenitsyn
Under President Obama we should have the cool heads and smarts to analyze the situation and alter the deployment based on how what is happening there is sized up...and I support Obama as the best man to remember and honor the fact that the military is not in existence merely top destroy and oppress; it is a there also to build and empower.
In this unit crest, along with the crossed arrows denoting unconventional warfare, and the De Oppresso Liber motto is the sword of righteousness which is also on the 'electric butter knife' shoulder patch of most S.F. units.
It means something. And it is to that meaning I am still dedicated as a former member of the United States Armed Forces.
SF sure has become sterile and politically correct (and Obamaesque) since I served 40 years ago.
SF always served the CIA, but now they do the bidding of Mossad/Israel, under cover of democratic imperialism and ridding the Mid-East of all those evil new Hitlers.
Ferret Mike:...I support Obama as the best man to remember and honor the fact that the military is not in existence merely top destroy and oppress; it is a there also to build and empower.
Hypocrisy Cop: SF always served the CIA, but now they do the bidding of Mossad/Israel, under cover of democratic imperialism and ridding the Mid-East of all those evil new Hitlers.
I'm a non-military taxpayer and both of your remarks are rather troubling to me.
Ferret Mike, why should US Armed Forces be used "for build and empower"? Silly me, I always believed my taxes supported the USAF to defend America. When did the Constitution call for our military to "build and empower" - I'm assuming you mean nation-building in foreign locations.
Hypocrisy Cop, why are SP "serving" the CIA? The CIA operate with a secret humongous budget and I thought there were many many many CIA agents on the payroll to do whatever the CIA is supposed to do besides wasting a ton of tax money that we are not allowed to know any detail about. Frankly the last thing I would want from a taxpayer's perspective is for the CIA to have any authority over military divisions or operations. The CIA couldn't even accurately identify a Chinese consulate on a map before it was inadvertedly bombed. The CIA is an incompetent bureaucratic morass.
One thing you have to deal with is racism and anti-Semitic sentiments cheapen the fabric of any forum or even any dialog.
Look, you tapdancing backtracking cretin, you're the one who has to "deal with" your inability to answer a simple yes/no question about the zionist 9/11 inside job without lecturing people on the imminent dangers of "anti-semitism," not me.
Hypocrisy Cop, why are SP [sic] "serving" the CIA? The CIA operate with a secret humongous budget and I thought there were many many many CIA agents on the payroll to do whatever the CIA is supposed to do besides wasting a ton of tax money that we are not allowed to know any detail about. Frankly the last thing I would want from a taxpayer's perspective is for the CIA to have any authority over military divisions or operations...The CIA is an incompetent bureaucratic morass.
You won't get any argument out of me, Scrapper, as I share your conclusion about the CIA/Mossad.
When I wrote SF (not SP), that's Special Forces, the U.S. Army's elite "green berets" whose shoulder patch and motto, 'de oppresso libre,' were mentioned.
The "new" SF isn't your daddy's SF. When we were liberating the oppressed South Vietnamese people back in the 1960s we were nearly all White and were likely to have voted for the George Wallace/Curtis "Bombs Away" LeMay ticket in '68, certainly never for a Halfrican-American named Barack Hussein Muhammed Obama. Let's say we hadn't entirely lost our implicit racial consciousness as a nearly homogeneous majority White nation 40 years ago. The U.S. wasn't quite yet the mongrelized, polyglot obomination it is today.
Read up a little on the CIA's Phoenix Program. It was SF personnel doing the dirty deeds for them, under cover of our U.S. Embassies, the USAID program, etc.
Now, I suppose, the CIA can use private armies such as Blackwater Inc. to do its deeds. It's becomming increasingly difficult for SF to retain career personnel with the proliferation of these private forces that recruit almost exclusively from Special Operation Forces, pay much better, and are unaccountable to either military OR civilian justice.
I see, black on white rape is the fault of the white girl....
It didn't take long for this thread about Yakub/Jacobs and inter-racial rape to get way off topic.
Apologies to all for my part in that. Don't blame Sambo for taking Whitey's women. He's merely following Nature's imperative to take what the competing subspecies is willing to give up, without a fight. Sambo is the symptom, Yakub Jacobs the disease.
When I wrote SF (not SP), that's Special Forces, the U.S. Army's elite "green berets" whose shoulder patch and motto, 'de oppresso libre,' were mentioned.
Ooops - my bad typing - I meant to type SF.
Thanks for the referral to John Perkins' book. I'll definitely check into it.
It didn't take long for this thread about Yakub/Jacobs and inter-racial rape to get way off topic.
No apology necessary, HC. Threads that run counter to the PC trade winds usually suffer the same fate, whether intentionally or not. Your contribution is much appreciated.
The article was apparently written by zionist nitwits who think they can pull off looking like something else, so how the fuck is talking about lying zionist nitwits and their stooges offtopic here, unless one is a zionist asshole?
Calling people zionist assholes is like saying they watched/read too much TV/newspaper "news" when they grew up. Now zionist assholes are trying to make it look like the internet is the problem, not the MSM, so the zionist assholes rig up internet articles like this.
The other point I wanted to make is that you're just an inept low-IQ race- baiter, which fits the "idiot zionist stooge" profile perfectly.
If you don't agree with every word on their side, you must be 100% on the other. If you disagree with a Zionist, you're an "anti-Semite," if you disagree with the Jew-obsessed, you're a "Zionist stooge."
Revolution requires elimination of the political middle. Both sides do their best to make the middle uninhabitable.
In Africa they do it with machetes, tires, and gasoline.
On what point do revisionist and orthodox historians agree? That the answer to the question is important.
But it is not the answer to the question that is important, it is the asking of it.
When a person can ask it without fear or malice, they are free.
Howard Dean said “If you look at folks of color, even women, they’re more successful in the Democratic party than they are in the white, uh, excuse me, in, uh, Republican party.”
All-in-all, wasn't the McCain campaign right to pounce on that?
Both sides do their best to make the middle uninhabitable.
The "middle" here is false-flagging zionist nitwit assholes, including the ones who come here and suggest I'm a jew because I complain about mass-murdering zionist assholes and their 9/11 false-flag inside job.
If you don't agree with every word on their side, you must be 100% on the other. If you disagree with a Zionist, you're an "anti-Semite," if you disagree with the Jew-obsessed, you're a "Zionist stooge."
This place is packed solid with zionist assholes pretending to not be zionist assholes, it's THAT FUCKING SIMPLE. For that simple observation, some cocksucker here will no doubt suggest I'm paranoid, whereas it's the paranoia of zionist assholes that actually packs this place with play-acting zionist assholes pretending to be something they aren't.
Is there an actual picture of this fucktard delusion somewhere on the web? Somehow I doubt it. Tried google image search already. I'm going to assume it's the alias for a group effort of ex-door-to-door framed "art" sellers, at least until further data comes in.
This place is packed solid with zionist assholes pretending to not be zionist assholes, it's THAT FUCKING SIMPLE. For that simple observation, some cocksucker here will no doubt suggest I'm paranoid, whereas it's the paranoia of zionist assholes that actually packs this place with play-acting zionist assholes pretending to be something they aren't.
enough with the accusations, ad homs, and vulgarity. you add nothing to productive discussion.
Oh, you've screened the clientele and rooted out the zionist clowns, have you?
People with their selective outrage at "vulgarity" specifically aimed at someone who is putting the heat on mass-murderer zionists who walk around freely, what to say to them?
If you own this site, just terminate my association with it.
It didn't take long for this thread about Yakub/Jacobs and inter-racial rape to get way off topic.
9/11 is not "off-topic," it's mentioned in the article, asshole.
Uh, Mr. Nobody, I was addressing Ferret Mike in my post #139, as you should still be able to see (before it scrolls off). In his post #98, FM took a fantastically imaginative leap, trying to tie together SF and support for an Obamination. I simply disagreed and followed him off topic momentarily.
I'll stipulate to the fact I can be an asshole. Try me some time and you'll find I can give as good as I get.
You're correct; the anti-Aryan Jew psychobabblist Jacobs did mention 9/11 with his anti-White quote. That Yid's guilt trip on Whitey sure did make me feel responsible for 9/11.
In his post #98, FM took a fantastically imaginative leap, trying to tie together SF and support for an Obamination. I simply disagreed and followed him off topic momentarily.
And I added to the off-topic digression by asking you and Ferret questions.
I apologize, nobody. I didn't mean to consciously direct the discussion further off course.
Here's my 2 cents, now worth half of one in most places around the world.
He's a classic agent provacateur.troll entity.
He's similar to some of the denizens of other forums - the constant references to analism and feces is a sure and smelly giveaway.
I had the misfortune to be the target of one of those types, however, the instrument in that case was a baton, and rather more targetedly carnal, when I had the temerity to google "eating shit" and putting a pic of really two lovely women, one "pitching" and one "catching" caught in that perfect moment of leaving one before being "caught" by the other.
One of those classic Attack threads with BAC when his asskissing sidekick, Alcuin went anal and fecal on me.
For that reason, the Goldie lady banned me.
The MO is similar here, and the over the top vitriol points not to an unhinged mind, but to a deliberate provocation.
Heck, I'd ask him to drop his pants and see if he was circumcised. Not a conclusive conclusion but known to be occasionally fatal historically . But some things one can be absolutely happy about missing with no deprivation regrets.
So, all in all, he's a putzier putz. He's a Jew, But he won't tell u.
"I'll stipulate to the fact I can be an asshole. Try me some time and you'll find I can give as good as I get."
Heh, I'll second the notion. It amazes me constantly that people consider barking on the porch that is a forum something worth getting into a dither about. Going eyeball to eyeball in the course of a political endeavour is much more a test of one is made of then wetting oneself because they got excited about a political eunuch like nobody screeching at them like a monkey angry because gloves were duct taped to it's hands to kep it from masturbating in the monkey house when it wants to.
"You only have power over people so long as you don't take everything away from them. But when you've robbed a man of everything he's no longer in your power -- he's free again. Alexander Solzhenitsyn
Heh, I'll second the notion. It amazes me constantly that people consider barking on the porch that is a forum something worth getting into a dither about. Going eyeball to eyeball in the course of a political endeavour is much more a test...
What I liked most about freedom4um when I was first introduced to it a couple of weeks ago was the generally serious tenor of some fellow thought criminals who share information/news here, and the apparent lack of hostile Jews and other non-Whites constantly disrupting that flow with flame wars. Being the 'Net freedom4um isn't perfect, but it's pretty good compared to most "free speech" discussion boards I seen that deal with hot topics like race, religion and war.
We'd get along fine, face to face like men, Mike. We share an appreciation for the great Russian nationalist, Mr. Solzhenitsyn, after all. That's a good start.
"Concern about Afghanistan is justified, but I want it clearly and rationally vetted before we quit our military involvement there."
"If we can analyze and address the errors made there so far by conventional troops and train and build a stabilizing force that can end the perpetual warfare and cultural fratricide of that conflict so deeply set into that country's socio-political fabric, this is an incredibly great gift we can give the people of this country."
You might want to take into account that the last time the Afghans were conquered it was Ghengis Khan.
Sounds great. Where is the Constitutional mandate for your Crusade?
...[B]lame white women for wanting a little spice once in a while.
A "little spice," you say? Now who would have introduced such a carnivorous bug into the ears of suggestible White girls that they should copulate with NAHAs?
THE SADDEST STORY EVER TOLD
When a white girl marries a negro, her sun of life goes down. And glaring spots of sin appear on her white wedding gown.And white and black men stand aghast, while viewing this range role: And mutter, “they will wreck themselves, and damn each other’s soul.”
We know a carnivorous bug has crept into her brain And gnawed away here self-respect, which left her half insane.
Now all her racial pride has flown beyond redemption’s fold And she begins life’s saddest tale that ever yet was told.
Three days and nights she felt black lips press smug against her own. And on the fourth, her troubled soul, let out a frightful groan.
And so the weeks and months flew by, and then a baby came; She looked at it with tear filled eyes, and hung her head with shame.
And then she dreamed of other days, sweet girlhood days gone by, And of the white friends left behind, and so we hear her cry;
“O, could I turn life’s pendulum backwards a few short years I would not bear this cross today, nor shed these bitter tears.”
“My baby would be white as snow, and sleep upon my breast Like a little fledgling robin that slumbers in its nest.
While now, O God, my mongrel child just whimpers through the night Till in my sleepless dreams I scream, not white, O God, not white!”
And so I stagger through my days far from God’s love and grace, Till now, I know, no black man lives, can take a white man’s place.
My offspring shall be mongrel bred, their hue-skin shall remain, For even God with all his power, cannot remove the stain.
I sold my birthright for a mess, I mixed my white-born blood With black blood, so I languish here like one bogged down in mud.
Though God may grant a pardon, I never can retrace My footsteps down life’s narrow road, back to the white man’s race.
So now I groan, “It might have been,” had racial pride been mine. Today I’d hug a pure white child, and call him half divine.
I’d lift him up before the world, and praise his father’s name, While now, my baby’s mongrel face, reminds me of my shame.
All other crimes may be forgiven when prayer its power fulfills; The scheming crook may find new hope, and even the man that kills,
But all my prayers can never clear my baby’s mongrel skin, Nor make him white as driven snow, nor cleanse my soul of sin.
I was my father’s future hope, my mother’s joy and pride But I got lost on life’s dark road, and there my spirit died.
I smeared my all-white heritage and left the white man’s track, Now my descendants for all time shall be forever black.
I try to hide from all the stars, the moon and the setting sun; For all mankind of my white race, condemn what I have done;
I tremble and my teardrops flow, I pray, but pray in vain; For nevermore shall I be one with my white race again.
And so dark clouds above me roll, deep waters crash below, I sink, and reap what I have sown, and drink my cup of woe.
My mother sleeps deep in her grave, my dad lies at her side, For both were crushed when I became a negro’s common bride.
Now, should I decide to leave him, where could I choose to go? My misspent life will follow me like footprints in the snow.
Before me lie dark jungles where paramours seek a prey: Behind me death keeps whispering, “I am the only way.”
This black and white, prenuptial mess, this racial suicide; Must be forbidden by the law, men must find racial pride!
Then, never again, forever, shall tales like mine unfold, With all its shame, the saddest tale, that ever yet was told.
