Freedom4um

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Neocon Nuttery
See other Neocon Nuttery Articles

Title: Palin's Hockey Rink Leads To Legal Trouble in the Town She Led
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://the-peoples-forum.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=4388
Published: Sep 7, 2008
Author: MICHAEL M. PHILLIPS
Post Date: 2008-09-08 10:35:52 by angle
Keywords: None
Views: 130
Comments: 6

WASILLA, Alaska -- The biggest project that Sarah Palin undertook as mayor of this small town was an indoor sports complex, where locals played hockey, soccer, and basketball, especially during the long, dark Alaskan winters.

The only catch was that the city began building roads and installing utilities for the project before it had unchallenged title to the land. The misstep led to years of litigation and at least $1.3 million in extra costs for a small municipality with a small budget. What was to be Ms. Palin's legacy has turned into a financial mess that continues to plague Wasilla.

"It's too bad that the city of Wasilla didn't do their homework and secure the land before they began construction," said Kathy Wells, a longtime activist here. "She was not your ceremonial mayor; she was in charge of running the city. So it was her job to make sure things were done correctly." Associated Press

Ms. Palin, now Alaska's governor and Republican Sen. John McCain's running mate, has pointed to her two terms as Wasilla's mayor, from 1996 to 2002, as evidence that she has enough executive experience to take on the presidency, should the need arise -- more than Democratic Sen. Barack Obama, who touts his own background as a community organizer in Chicago.

"I guess a small-town mayor is sort of like a community organizer, except that you have actual responsibilities," Ms. Palin said Wednesday in her acceptance speech at the Republican convention.

Litigation resulting from the dispute over Ms. Palin's sports-complex project is still in the courts, with the land's former owner seeking hundreds of thousands of additional dollars from the city.

Hockey is much loved in Wasilla, and Ms. Palin, whose son was a star player, wanted to build an indoor rink, with a track, basketball courts and soccer field. In the late 1990s, the city sought a 145-acre parcel owned by the Nature Conservancy, which wanted to sell the land to buy more environmentally sensitive property elsewhere. City officials negotiated a price of $126,000. Months passed without the city's securing a signed purchase agreement, according to the city's attorney, Tom Klinkner of Birch, Horton, Bittner & Cherot.

At the same time, Gary Lundgren, a Fairbanks real-estate investor, was in talks with the Nature Conservancy to buy a larger adjacent property. As discussions between the environmental group and the city dragged on, Mr. Lundgren said, he purchased the entire site for about $1 million.

The city sued Mr. Lundgren and the Nature Conservancy, arguing that Wasilla had had a deal. In 2001, a federal district court judge ruled in Wasilla's favor. Mr. Lundgren appealed, but the city believed it would prevail, according to Mr. Klinkner.

Ms. Palin marched ahead, making the public case for a sales-tax increase and $14.7 million bond issue to pay for the sports center, which was to feature a running track, basketball courts and a hockey rink. At the time, the city's annual budget was about $20 million. In a March 2002 referendum, residents approved the mayor's plan by a 20-vote margin, 306 to 286. The city cleared roads, installed utilities and made preparations to build.

Later that year, Ms. Palin's final one as mayor, the federal judge reversed his own decision and ruled that the property rightfully belonged to Mr. Lundgren. Wasilla had never signed the proper papers, the court ruled. Greg Hensel /Alaska Stock In Wasilla, Alaska, the construction of an indoor sports facility (shown above), initiated during Sarah Palin's term as mayor, has led to years of litigation over property rights and at least $1.3 million in extra costs for the town.

Mr. Lundgren said he had offered to give smaller parcels to the city free of charge, but the city held out for a larger tract. The former chief of the city finance department, Ted Leonard, says he doesn't recall such an offer.

After Ms. Palin left office, the city decided to take 80 acres of Mr. Lundgren's property through eminent domain. An Alaska court confirmed the city's right to do so and ordered that an arbitrator determine the appropriate price.

Last year, the arbitrator ordered the city to pay $836,378 for the 80-acre parcel, far more than the $126,000 Wasilla originally thought it would pay for a piece of land 65 acres larger. The arbitrator also determined that the city owed Mr. Lundgren $336,000 in interest. Wasilla's legal bill since the eminent domain action has come to roughly $250,000 so far, according to Mr. Klinkner, the city attorney.

Mr. Lundgren has appealed the decision, arguing that the arbitrator should have awarded him more interest. "It has been 10 years; it's just insane," said Mr. Lundgren, who now lives in Panama. "All [Ms. Palin] had to do was close the transaction."

The McCain-Palin campaign referred questions about the sports complex to Mr. Leonard, the former city finance chief. He blamed the Nature Conservancy for dealing with two different potential buyers at one time. "That's what caused the confusion," he said.

"At the time, with the information she had, [Ms. Palin] made the right decision," Mr. Leonard said. "But you know what? Litigation happens."

The sports facility is finished, set against forest and mountain ranges. Inside, locals kick soccer balls and skate laps on the rink. Last year, it hosted a statewide wrestling tournament.

"All I can say about the sports complex is that it was done on time and under budget," said Donald Moore, a Palin ally who managed the construction. "It was done legally, and for someone else to say it could have been done differently in a better way, that's strictly their opinion."

Ms. Palin cited her mayoral duties as partial evidence of her executive experience. Dianne Woodruff, a Wasilla city councilwoman and critic of Ms. Palin's performance, agreed.

"If people are going to be voting on her based on her experience as Wasilla's mayor, then they should know how she did in the job," Ms. Woodruff said, "the good, the bad and the ugly."

Write to Michael M. Phillips at michael.phillips@wsj.com

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: angle (#0)

The Peoples forum....lol....All Obama all the time.

Old Friend  posted on  2008-09-08   10:52:06 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: angle (#0)

I'm rather disappointed, angle..........there is a story similar to this out there which includes the most assinine of all statements. Some complaining bitch said that Palin had caused them to use some of the city's reserve.

Had to laugh my ass off at that one---what exactly do they think 'reserves' or 'surpluses' or 'contingency fees' are for? But then, she's a professional whining bitcher and she'd know the sheeple wouldn't have the brain cells to realize the stupidity of her comment, but rather take it that she 'knows' something really, really important against Palin!

LOL........it gets funnier all the time.

rowdee  posted on  2008-09-08   11:47:17 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: rowdee (#2) (Edited)

In Wasilla, Alaska, the construction of an indoor sports facility (shown above), initiated during Sarah Palin's term as mayor, has led to years of litigation over property rights and at least $1.3 million in extra costs for the town. "...it gets funnier all the time..."

The article is from the WSJ. Perhaps addressing the issues contained in this article might be more productive than slamming another forum where good people who used to post here congregate, or alluding to another story not referenced.

I see when questions rightfully come up about Obama, no problem. When the snake gets investigated, as she rightfully should, ho hum, look the other way.

Funny? It's tragic.

angle  posted on  2008-09-08   15:19:59 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: angle (#3)

I don't know what other forums you are alluding to.........nor do I give a damn about BO--he's another one I'd never vote for.

The article I read, and I think it was at My Way News had a paragraph where some broad up there was whining about using the city's reserve funds. I thought it was hilarious, and that is why I mentioned it. I didn't even look to see who or where your article came from.

As to the issue itself, I wrote to someone else that at least she didn't use eminent domain (that came later, after the courts had said the city was correct........and then later said they were incorrect........but then sort of indicated it didn't matter cause the city could use eminent domain to get the needed lands for the sports complex.

AND, even had she used eminent domain it wouldn't be the same category/cause/whatever as the current liar in chief and his group did with the folks down in TX cause he personally benefitted mucho from that sports complex.

Personally, I think it is immoral to be using eminent domain--especially for things like a sports complex, a private developer, a sports team, and undoubtedly virtually everything else, if not absolutely everything else.

OTOH, there are those (notably on the left) that would raise taxes on everyone so that only the poor could use the facility, or only the younguns could use it, or what not.

Personally, I believe the private sector should have owned and operated it--cause if their prices were too high, no one would/could participate.

rowdee  posted on  2008-09-08   17:02:38 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: angle (#4)

No comment or opinion as to my comments on the content of the article? I thought you wanted to discuss the issue.......perhaps your computer is having problems, or your ISP==I'll withhold any little snide comments or digs for the present. :)

rowdee  posted on  2008-09-08   19:12:29 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: rowdee (#4)

at least she didn't use eminent domain

those (notably on the left) that would raise taxes on everyone

Personally, I believe the private sector should have owned and operated it

Here's the issue: "The city began building roads and installing utilities for the project before it had unchallenged title to the land. The misstep led to years of litigation and at least $1.3 million in extra costs for a small municipality with a small budget."

She doesn't sound like much of a competent manager. FYI, I belive that during her tenure, taxes were raised on residents and lowered on businesses.

The purpose of posting this is to add to the repetoire of Palin's credentials or lack thereof. This one's in the "lack" category, imo.

angle  posted on  2008-09-08   19:27:39 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest