Freedom4um

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Neocon Nuttery
See other Neocon Nuttery Articles

Title: Russia Warns of New Missile Deployment [one of the messes WHITE Double-You leaves behind for others to clean]
Source: The New York Times
URL Source: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/06/w ... europe/06russia.html?ref=world
Published: Nov 5, 2008
Author: ELLEN BARRY and SOPHIA KISHKOVSKY
Post Date: 2008-11-05 09:22:24 by a vast rightwing conspirator
Keywords: None
Views: 281
Comments: 8

Russia Warns of New Missile Deployment

By ELLEN BARRY and SOPHIA KISHKOVSKY
Published: November 5, 2008
MOSCOW — In a wide-ranging attack on the United States as it elected a new president, the Russian leader Dmitri A. Medvedev warned on Wednesday that Moscow might deploy short-range missiles in the Baltic region to counter a perceived threat from a proposed American missile defense shield in eastern Europe.

Mr. Medvedev also proposed to extend the constitutional term of the presidency from four years to six — a move that could enable future Russian presidents to serve 12 years in two consecutive terms. His remarks, in his first state of the nation address since assuming the presidency in May, was delivered within hours of the election of Barack Obama and offered a chill glimpse into the potential issues and tensions confronting the new American leader when he takes office in January. His comments also seemed at odds with the broader groundswell of support for the American president-elect from many governments across the globe.

Mr. Medvedev did not specifically congratulate Mr. Obama on his victory, saying only that he hoped that “our partners — the new U.S. administration — will make a choice in favor of full-fledged relationship with Russia.”

At the same time, however, he spoke of a “new configuration for the military forces of our country” that would include abandoning plans to dismantle some missile regiments and the stationing of missiles in Russia’s Baltic enclave of Kaliningrad.

“We earlier planned to take three missile regiments within the missile division stationed in Kozelsk off combat duty and discontinue the division itself by 2010. I have decided to refrain from these plans,” Mr. Medvedev said.

“The Iskander missile system will be deployed in Kaliningrad region to neutralize, when necessary, the missile shield,” Medvedev said.

“Radioelectronic equipment located in the western region” of Russia in the Kaliningrad region “will jam objects of the U.S. missile defense system,” Mr. Medvedev said.

“These are forced measures,” Mr. Medvedev said. “We have told our partners more than once that we want positive cooperation, we want to act together to combat common threats, that we want to act together. But they, unfortunately, don’t want to listen to us.”

He was apparently referring to discussions on the proposed missile shield with the United States.

Kaliningrad lies between Lithuania and Poland on the Baltic Sea, a wedge between countries firmly aligned with the West since the collapse of the Soviet Union. Lithuania and Poland are members of the American-led NATO alliance.

Iskander missiles have a range of about 250 miles and use conventional warheads, according to news reports. The United States say the missile shield is needed to intercept missiles from states including Iran and does not threaten Russia. But Russia says it regards the system as a threat and has warned that it would target such installations in lands that belonged to the Warsaw Pact.

In the 90-minute speech, he rounded on the United States, saying the global financial crisis had begun as a “local extraordinary event” in American markets and blaming the August war in Georgia on “the U.S. administration’s policy which is selfish, cannot stand criticism and prefers unilateral decisions,” Reuters reported.

He said Washington’s belief in “its own opinion as the only right and indisputable one” had “in the final account led the United States to economic blunders.”

Referring to the fighting in Georgia, he said: “The conflict in the Caucasus was used as a pretext for sending NATO warships to the Black Sea and then for the forceful foisting on Europe of America’s anti-missile system, which in its turn will entail retaliatory measures by Russia.”

The fighting in Georgia was “among other things, the result of the arrogant course of the U.S. administration which hates criticism and prefers unilateral decisions,” Medvedev said, according to news reports.

His speech was broadcast live on television and radio.

Speaking about Russia’s constitutional arrangements, Mr. Medvedev said he proposed increasing term limits for presidents from four to six years and for lawmakers from four to five years. He did not say when the changes would come into effect.

The issue of term limits surfaced during the eight-year rule of Mr. Medvedev’s successor, Vladimir Putin, when there was speculation that Mr. Putin might seek to remain in office by changing the constitution to secure a third term. Instead, Mr. Medvedev appointed his predecessor prime minister.

Mr. Medvedev said the proposed extension was necessary to confront challenges. And, he said, he wanted to enhance the powers of Parliament.

“I am convinced that our movement toward freedom and democracy will be successful and steadfast only if the authority of the president and the State Duma will be high,” he said, according to Reuters. He said the authorities should have “enough time to implement what they announced and show the results of their work to the people.”

Ellen Barry and Sophia Kishkovsky reported from Moscow and Alan Cowell contributed from Paris.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: All (#0)

It's funny, some clueless dunce is criticizing me on some other thread for having voted (and delivered PA) for Kerry, back in '04.

Well, Mr. JT (clueless dunce you are) this is ONE of the reasons I tried to end Double-Stupid's reign 4 years ago. I failed America then but we did good work yesterday. Sadly, trillions have been wasted, thousands have died, hope was lost because the WHITE double-freak monster was re-elected in 2004.

Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'

a vast rightwing conspirator  posted on  2008-11-05   9:35:22 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#1) (Edited)

You really think that John Kerry (who voted the way Bush wanted him to vote on just about every foreign policy initiative) would have been any better?

Rupert_Pupkin  posted on  2008-11-05   12:30:22 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: Rupert_Pupkin (#2)

Yes.

Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'

a vast rightwing conspirator  posted on  2008-11-05   12:38:54 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#3) (Edited)

On what evidence? Wishful thinking? Did Kerry vote against authorizing the invasion of Iraq in 2003? Has he tried to defund the wars with the help of his pals Pelosi and Barney? If he has, I must have missed it.

Like most anti-war Democrats, you go around pretending that your party is the party of anti-Zionism and of peace in the face of all evidence to the contrary. Just like conservative Republicans go around pretending that theirs is the party of free markets and fiscal responsibility.

Rupert_Pupkin  posted on  2008-11-05   12:41:56 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: Rupert_Pupkin (#4) (Edited)

Kerry is not a stupid moron. And don't give me that idiotic 'everybody does it crap' because everybody doesn't do it. Cretins like Bush, McCain and their kind do 'it', not 'everybody'.

Try to concentrate on the topic of this thread if you can. The Russians are installing nuclear missiles because cretinoid Bush is spending billions to set up a 'defense capability' to defend against imaginary Iranian missiles equipped with imaginary nuclear warheads, posing imaginary threats to Bush's imaginary allies in Europe. Now, the Russians are making the missiles real and giving us a real enemy with a thousand times more missiles that the multi-billion dollar facility could defend from.

Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'

a vast rightwing conspirator  posted on  2008-11-05   12:51:04 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#5) (Edited)

The reason I bring up Iraq is that it shows how the Dems and GOP are almost always on the same foreign policy page. Now, as for Russia: Your man Obummer gave the same tough PNAC scripted talk on Russia as McCain, in case you missed the 2d Presidential debate. I haven't followed John Kerry on the issue, but I'm sure he's on the same page. If Kerry or Obummer were fighting Bush on the European missile defense, they were pretty damn quiet about it.

Alan Dershowitz and Bill Kristol both wrote op-eds saying that there isn't much difference in foreign policy between mainstream Democrats and Republicans. For once, I agree with Dershowitz and Kristol.

Rupert_Pupkin  posted on  2008-11-05   12:54:15 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: Rupert_Pupkin (#6)

Try to cite some more reputable authorities if you feel like invoking some authority to help with your argument. Dr. Torture-Bezerkowitz and Billy Kristal? :))) Can you find anyone less ridiculous than these 2?

Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'

a vast rightwing conspirator  posted on  2008-11-05   12:59:08 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#7)

The point is, Dershowitz and Kristol would be equally happy with either a Democrat or a Republican, at least when it comes to foreign policy. If they approve of a candidate or a party, that's reason enough to write that person or party off as a lost cause.

Rupert_Pupkin  posted on  2008-11-05   13:02:51 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest