4um: The thread that's changed its focus from the original title. Carry on ;)

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
Resistance
See other Resistance Articles
Title: The thread that's changed its focus from the original title. Carry on ;)
Source: [None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: Mar 21, 2009
Author: m e
Post Date: 2009-03-21 08:19:06 by Itistoolate
Keywords: None
Views: 11711
Comments: 2261

Officer Jack McLamb's shows:
arc.gcnlive.com/Archives2009/mar09/McLamb/030209.mp3
arc.gcnlive.com/Archives2009/mar09/McLamb/030309.mp3
arc.gcnlive.com/Archives2009/mar09/McLamb/030409.mp3
arc.gcnlive.com/Archives2009/mar09/McLamb/030509.mp3
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 143.
#4. To: Itistoolate (#0)
It could just be that Goldi has gone away for the weekend and doesn't know the site is down,or that there has been an equipment failure of some sort and they are working on getting it fixed.
Or it could just be that she got tired of putting up with all the crap,and just pulled the plug. I doubt the last one,though. I think she would post a notice if she were going to do this.

sneakypete posted on 2009-03-21 9:21:48 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#8. To: sneakypete (#4)
Or it could just be that she got tired of putting up with all the crap,and just pulled the plug.

Crap????

Like the resident Jews whining and sniveling to her all the time about the horrible anti semites?????
I dont think so. Ass kissing goys make me and this forum sick.

Cynicom posted on 2009-03-21 10:00:21 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#22. To: Cynicom (#8)
Crap????
Like the resident Jews whining and sniveling to her all the time about the horrible anti semites?????

I guess it's all in the viewpoint. I see more Jew haters calling her names than I see Jews sniveling about anti-Semites.
BTW,I was called a anti-Semite there the day before the site went down,and it wasn't the first time. I see no evidence of the Jews and Israeli-Firsters there having any more influence with her than anybody else. In fact,she even banned Margueritte a couple of years ago under another of her screen names.

sneakypete posted on 2009-03-21 11:28:30 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#25. To: sneakypete (#22)
I guess it's all in the viewpoint. I see more Jew haters calling her names than I see Jews sniveling about anti-Semites.

Perhaps there is a thought...
You also like magician, Marge and the others see nothing but Jew haters.
If you look at LP, that is nearly all you see, people that see anti semitism under their bed, in the closet and are afraid to deal with it.
No one on LP has ever raised the specter of anti goyism, have you ever wondered about that Pete????
I can go on LP and demand we nuke the Arab world, and not ONE WORD of disapproval, from anyone, not one.

Cynicom posted on 2009-03-21 11:51:06 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#28. To: Cynicom (#25)
I can go on LP and demand we nuke the Arab world, and not ONE WORD of disapproval, from anyone, not one.

Missed this one.
I can't speak for anyone else,but you would hear protest there from me.
What you seem to be missing is most of the people there (and everywhere else) that cheer the suggestion we nuke the A-Rabs aren't Jewish. Most are Christians,if in name only. They are people who bought into the whole terrorism thing at face value,and they are scared.
BTW,I think that unless the NWO does take over we will eventually end up nuking several Muslim countries. It is inevitable that sooner or later some fundie Muslim group or another is going to get their hands on a nuke or a bio weapon,and use it to attack a major US city. Once that happens,all bets are off. Even I will be cheering to see the mushroom clouds over Arabia.

sneakypete posted on 2009-03-21 12:03:12 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#33. To: sneakypete (#28)
I think that unless the NWO does take over we will eventually end up nuking several Muslim countries. It is inevitable that sooner or later some fundie Muslim group or another is going to get their hands on a nuke or a bio weapon,and use it to attack a major US city.

Maybe that's why I thought you to be the enemy. Do you still buy the lie that fundie muzzies hit us on 9/11 without Bush's help?

Critter posted on 2009-03-21 14:31:12 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#76. To: Critter (#33)
Do you still buy the lie that fundie muzzies hit us on 9/11 without Bush's help?

It pained me to believe it so without reservation, but the complicity by purposeful neglect indicts the globalist Bush Administration puppetmeisters is obvious IMO.
Oh...And, no, I don't believe Bush himself was capable of masterminding a lemonade stand.

Liberator posted on 2009-03-21 20:32:36 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#79. To: F16Fighter (#76)
I don't believe Bush himself was capable of masterminding a lemonade stand.

LOL! Yes indeed--to be a mastermind presupposes the presence of a mind.

James Deffenbach posted on 2009-03-21 20:39:06 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#86. To: James Deffenbach (#79)
LOL! Yes indeed--to be a mastermind presupposes the presence of a mind.

Dubya has a "mind"...It's just been "borrowed" by Poppy's Elitist friends.

Liberator posted on 2009-03-21 20:49:18 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#90. To: F16Fighter (#86)
Dubya has a "mind"...

Well, compared to the current occupant of the White House he almost sounds like a candidate for MENSA. But to say he is probably smarter than the Obamasiah is not bragging on him. More like damning him with faint praise.

James Deffenbach posted on 2009-03-21 20:53:10 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#98. To: James Deffenbach (#90)
Well, compared to the current occupant of the White House he almost sounds like a candidate for MENSA. But to say he is probably smarter than the Obamasiah is not bragging on him. More like damning him with faint praise.

LOL...
As we've gotten to "know" 0bomba, I believe Dubya's actually gained in mental stature. Sadly. And ironically.
Dubya may not have been able to run that lemonade stand, but at least he would have attempted to run it; Obama would have turned his nose up at the prospect, while giggling and lighting HUGE joint...then conning someone else to run it.

Liberator posted on 2009-03-21 21:04:25 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#100. To: F16Fighter (#98) (Edited)
Obama would have turned his nose up at the prospect, while giggling and lighting HUGE joint...then conning someone else to run it.

Here is what his pet chimp (Michelle) said about him:

"Barack Obama will require you to work. He is going to demand that you shed your cynicism. That you put down your divisions. That you come out of your isolation, that you move out of your comfort zone . . . Barack will never allow you to go back to your lives as usual - uninvolved, uninformed."

Where did she get the stupid idea that he could "require" people to work? He is an EMPLOYEE, not the boss. And it is doubtful he is even a legitimate employee.

James Deffenbach posted on 2009-03-21 21:09:58 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#101. To: James Deffenbach (#100)
Where did she get the stupid idea that he could "require" people to work?

Apparently when the 'State takes the Road':
An Extract from "DAS KAPITAL" Karl Marx - 1867

"Owners of capital will stimulate the working class to buy more and more expensive goods, and houses, pushing them to take more and more expensive credits, until debt becomes unbearable.
The unpaid debt will lead to the bankruptcy of banks, which will have to be nationalized, and the State will have to take the road which will eventually lead to Communism. "
Karl Marx, 1867.

nooz posted on 2009-03-21 21:13:02 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#105. To: nooz (#101)
Apparently when the 'State takes the Road':
An Extract from "DAS KAPITAL" Karl Marx - 1867
"Owners of capital will stimulate the working class to buy more and more expensive goods, and houses, pushing them to take more and more expensive credits, until debt becomes unbearable.
The unpaid debt will lead to the bankruptcy of banks, which will have to be nationalized, and the State will have to take the road which will eventually lead to Communism. "
Karl Marx, 1867.

:chills:

Rotara posted on 2009-03-21 22:46:20 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#106. To: Rotara (#105)
To: nooz
Apparently when the 'State takes the Road': An Extract from "DAS KAPITAL" Karl Marx - 1867
"Owners of capital will stimulate the working class to buy more and more expensive goods, and houses, pushing them to take more and more expensive credits, until debt becomes unbearable.
The unpaid debt will lead to the bankruptcy of banks, which will have to be nationalized, and the State will have to take the road which will eventually lead to Communism. "
Karl Marx, 1867.
:chills:

Communism sounds quaint compared to the ROAD we're on.
But just in case it's not clear enough:

Baxter: Product contained live bird flu virus

www.infowars.com/baxter-p...ined-live-bird-flu-virus/

Vaccines as Biological Weapons? Live Avian Flu Virus Placed in Baxter Vaccine Materials Sent to 18 Countries
www.infowars.com/vaccines...ons-live-avian-flu-virus- placed-in-baxter-vaccine-materials-sent-to-18-countries/

nooz posted on 2009-03-21 23:00:18 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#109. To: nooz (#106)
The Global Fascist State built with a compassionate communism is something I'm very well aware of.
Thanks for the links

Rotara posted on 2009-03-21 23:17:33 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#111. To: Rotara (#109)
The Global Fascist State built with a compassionate communism is something I'm very well aware of.
Thanks for the links

When will people understand that what is happening is not the accident of voting.

nooz posted on 2009-03-21 23:19:57 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#116. To: nooz (#111)

When will people understand that what is happening is not the accident of voting.

The people are stupid always have been and always will be. Its just the way humans are. The vast majority are stupid, and have no capacity to understand complex things.
However I think you aren't grasping what is happening now either. American society has been controlled by the business class almost from the beginning. Some colonies like Virgina were freaking set up by corporations. Literally a corporation, Virgina Company.
America didn't have a nobility, we had a business class. This is because land was almost free, since you could always move west. In europe land was scarce, and true wealth was in owning land. In America wealth was always in commerce, and banking.
America established a national bank almost immediately. And the United States has had central banking its entire history save 1837-1864. Corporate influence over the United States has always been there.
What we are seeing is nothing new, nor particularly worse than before.
This is important to realize, because there are many things that need to be fixed, but if you view our current situations without the lens of history you will never accomplish anything. This isn't the end or the world or anything close.

Rhino369 posted on 2009-03-21 23:40:54 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#122. To: Rhino369 (#116) (Edited)
The people are stupid always have been and always will be. Its just the way humans are. The vast majority are stupid, and have no capacity to understand complex things.
However I think you aren't grasping what is happening now either. American society has been controlled by the business class almost from the beginning. Some colonies like Virgina were freaking set up by corporations. Literally a corporation, Virgina Company.
America didn't have a nobility, we had a business class. This is because land was almost free, since you could always move west. In europe land was scarce, and true wealth was in owning land. In America wealth was always in commerce, and banking.
America established a national bank almost immediately. And the United States has had central banking its entire history save 1837-1864. Corporate influence over the United States has always been there.
What we are seeing is nothing new, nor particularly worse than before.
This is important to realize, because there are many things that need to be fixed, but if you view our current situations without the lens of history you will never accomplish anything. This isn't the end or the world or anything close.

Totally edited.
I do view what is happening through the lens of history and then some.

nooz posted on 2009-03-21 23:47:03 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#143. To: nooz (#122)
I do view what is happening through the lens of history and then some.

Then you should see, America isn't really worse off than we were 150 years ago, nor significantly less free. The idea of a totally free America is revisionist bullshit. If you lived on the frontier you had economic, and political freedom, but that only lasted too long before civilization caught up. We just ran out of frontier. However the cities were always controlled by business interests. Hell the business class supported the revolution exactly because it was in their best interests.
Were the sharecroppers and tenant farmers paying 15% interest (on rent, seed, and tools, all purchased from their land owners store, and they had to sell to their owners distribution company) free?
Were factory workers who had to work 12 hours in horrible conditions free?
There are many parallels to modern events from the past. America went to war based on false intelligence to supposedly liberate a people and instead fought tough insurgencies, it was called the Spanish American war, and it was 1898. Instead of Iraqi insurgents it was Filipinos.
To steal a line from Battlestar Galactica, "All of this has happened, and will happen again."
America isn't ending. So don't get depressed.

Rhino369 posted on 2009-03-22 0:09:09 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
Replies to Comment # 143.
#144. To: Rhino369 (#143)
In short

It's about the Bankster controlled Police State (now fully equipped to take US on).

Rotara posted on 2009-03-22 00:11:10 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#146. To: Rhino369 (#143)
Then you should see, America isn't really worse off than we were 150 years ago, nor significantly less free. The idea of a totally free America is revisionist bullshit. If you lived on the frontier you had economic, and political freedom, but that only lasted too long before civilization caught up. We just ran out of frontier. However the cities were always controlled by business interests. Hell the business class supported the revolution exactly because it was in their best interests.
Were the sharecroppers and tenant farmers paying 15% interest (on rent, seed, and tools, all purchased from their land owners store, and they had to sell to their owners distribution company) free?
Were factory workers who had to work 12 hours in horrible conditions free?
There are many parallels to modern events from the past. America went to war based on false intelligence to supposedly liberate a people and instead fought tough insurgencies, it was called the Spanish American war, and it was 1898. Instead of Iraqi insurgents it was Filipinos.
To steal a line from Battlestar Galactica, "All of this has happened, and will happen again."
America isn't ending. So don't get depressed.

Thank you for your diatribe. When LP is back up, sell it there.

nooz posted on 2009-03-22 00:12:09 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#157. To: Rhino369 (#143)
Start here:
http://video.google.com/videosear c h?q=the+creature+from+jekyll+island&emb=0&aq=f#

christine posted on 2009-03-22 00:22:54 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
End Trace Mode for Comment # 143.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest

Freedom4um