See other Resistance Articles
Title: The thread that's changed its focus from the original title. Carry on ;)
Source:
[None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: Mar 21, 2009
Author: m e
Post Date: 2009-03-21 08:19:06 by Itistoolate
Keywords: None
Views: 28502
Comments: 2261
Officer Jack McLamb's shows:
arc.gcnlive.com/Archives2009/mar09/McLamb/030209.mp3
arc.gcnlive.com/Archives2009/mar09/McLamb/030309.mp3
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Comments (1-1725) not displayed.
.
.
.
#1726. To: war (#1721)
None of you, to a person, realize how OBVIOUS you look. If it looks like a shill and smells like a shill......
Laugh now, cry later, you traitor.
God is always good!
"surprise, surprise" lol! At least he (war) is consistent.
tHe traitor war has been on bozo for weeks so he's talking to himself as far as I'm concerned ..as hjas FERRET AND ALL THE OTHER TRAITORS
Law Enforcement Against Prohibition You think the people of this country exist to provide you with position. I think your position exists to provide those people with freedom.~~William Wallace ALAS, BABYLON. It's over. Last one here turn out the lights.
true dat.
eez...yet one more lame post I need to catch up to...
I strive to be more consistent than your answers to my questions, Moonie... So far I haven't had to do anything...
When a Moonbat says "YOU CANNOT TRUST THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA!!!!" he really means: "Unless it supports some Moonbat blathering." When a Moonbat says: "THE FACT THAT THE TOWERS FELL AT FREE FALL SPEED MEANS THAT THEY WERE BLOWED UP!!!" he can also say "THE FACT THAT THE TOWERS DID NOT FALL AT FREE FALL SPEED MEANS THAT THEY WERE BLOWED-UP!!!" When a Moonbat says: "THE PLANES DID NOT EXPLODE INSIDE THE TOWERS!!!" He can also say: "THOSE PLANES WERE PULVERIZED AS THEY TORE THROUGH THE TOWERS!!!" A Moonbat can say: "THEY CLAIMED THAT JET FUEL BROUGHT DOWN THOSE TOWERS!!!!" When no-one has said that jet fuel brought down the Towers. A Moonbat can say: THE GOOBERMINT CLAIMS THAT TOWERS PANCAKED!!!" when in fact the NIST states, unequivocally, that the Towers did not pancake.
When war says, "I AM NOT A TRAITOR", what he really means is, that HE is not a traitor to the NWO!
God is always good!
And .gov can tell FAIRY STORIES and people like you believe them...all of them, regardless of the fact that .gov has shown itself to be duplicitous, acting contrary to the Rule of Law, trampling over the Constitution, acting as tyrants rather than servants to the People, whose will .gov ignores.
The difference here is that your "argument" HAS to put words into my mouth when al I have done above is repeat what yinz have already said.
Which doesn't mean that the NIST report is incorrect.
Sheeesh, you gotta be kidding me, Pete. After the way we fought Iraq with kid gloves, how can you say we're gonna use nuclear weapons on Iran or Syria? If we go into either country--and I have my doubts that we will--we'll go in using conventional forces...MUD
Devolve Power Outta the Federal Leviathan and Back to the States, Anyone dopey enough to obey an order by Obama to fight in one of these nations deserves to come home in a box.
Depends upon what Iran does...regarding their nukes, I wouldn't be surprised to see some bunkerbusters dropped on Iran's production facilities...MUD
Devolve Power Outta the Federal Leviathan and Back to the States, So Israel is the only nation in the ME who should be nuclear armed?
I definitely believe Iran ought not be allowed to obtain nukes...MUD
Devolve Power Outta the Federal Leviathan and Back to the States, I have a problem with the government telling other sovereign nations what they can and can't have. We have nukes and have used them. It isn't that I give a rat's @$$ about Iran and maybe we should have lit them up when they held our people hostage when Carter was president. But we didn't and so far as I know they have not committed further acts of aggression against us.
Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end. But it's OK for Israel to have them?
At this point, for me to believe anything that .gov says, they have to prove they're not lying. Short of that I don't trust it or believe it about anything, as far as I can spit.
I don't base my opinions on misanthropy. I base them on facts...what is proveable...what is not...
And how many more times does government and the politicians of the U.S. have to prove to you their level of lies, corruption, and willful disregard to the Rule of Law and the Constitution of the United States of America for you to begin to wonder about their motivations and statements?
I don't have "to wonder" about them at all. It's all about money. Which, of course, does not man that 9/11 was an "inside job".
Feel free to asnwer any of the questions that have been posed to you. Thanks.
bump!
He saw it and is sitting there considering the irpony of his statement.
With your kind of "logic", General George Washington and those under his command, would have been in error to suspect and question the veracity of: 1) intelligence gathered, 2) data compiled, 3) evidence presented, 4) and statements made by Benedict Arnold, even after he was proved to be traitor.
In the statement released from Riyadh in Saudi Arabia via the PRNewswire, Prince Faisal said he plans a "concerted effort" to clear his brother's name and reputation. The statement reads: http://www.bloodhorse.com/horse-racing/articles/22222/brother-looks-to-clear- name-of-prince-ahmed-salman?id=22222 Speaking of 9/11, I recently heard this Kentucky Derby connection/allegation with the owner of your big Derby horse winner. I'm just saying... He died of a heart attack at age 43.
What do you know anyway, baldy?
None of you, to a person, realize how FUCKING stupid you sound.
#1727. To: war (#1721)
Chuckles...yea dude...I am just so OVERWHELMED by you fools.
#1728. To: litus, war (#1723)
Two more lame posts from you.
#1729. To: RickyJ (#1727)
(Edited)
"Corporation: An entity created for the legal protection of its human parasites, whose sole purpose is profit and self-perpetuation." ~~ IndieTx
#1730. To: TwentyTwelve (#1728)
#1731. To: RickyJ (#1727)
#1732. To: TwentyTwelve (#1728)
#1733. To: TwentyTwelve, litus, RickyJ, FormerLurker, Original Intent (#1726)
#1734. To: war (#1733)
(Edited)
#1735. To: war, TwentyTwelve, RickyJ, FormerLurker, Original Intent (#1733)
#1736. To: RickyJ (#1734)
When war says, "I AM NOT A TRAITOR", what he really means is, that HE is not a traitor to the NWO!
#1737. To: litus (#1735)
And .gov can tell FAIRY STORIES and people like you believe them...all of them, regardless of the fact that .gov has shown itself to be duplicitous, acting contrary to the Rule of Law, trampling over the Constitution, acting as tyrants rather than servants to the People, whose will .gov ignores.
#1738. To: sneakypete (#28)
(Edited)
"I think that unless the NWO does take over we will eventually end up nuking several Muslim countries."
Localities, and Individuals as Prescribed in the U.S. Constitution!!
#1739. To: Mudboy Slim (#1738)
If we go into either country--and I have my doubts that we will--we'll go in using conventional forces...MUD
#1740. To: Jethro Tull (#1739)
Localities, and Individuals as Prescribed in the U.S. Constitution!!
#1741. To: Mudboy Slim (#1740)
regarding their nukes
#1742. To: Jethro Tull (#1741)
Localities, and Individuals as Prescribed in the U.S. Constitution!!
#1743. To: Mudboy Slim (#1742)
Lord Acton
#1744. To: Mudboy Slim (#1742)
I definitely believe Iran ought not be allowed to obtain nukes...MUD
#1745. To: war (#1737)
(Edited)
Which doesn't mean that the NIST report is incorrect.
#1746. To: litus (#1745)
#1747. To: war (#1746)
I base them on facts...what is proveable...what is not...
#1748. To: litus (#1747)
To war: And how many more times does government and the politicians of the U.S. have to prove to you their level of lies, corruption, and willful disregard to the Rule of Law and the Constitution of the United States of America for you to begin to wonder about their motivations and statements?
"When a man who is honestly mistaken hears the truth, he will either quit being mistaken or cease to be honest."
#1749. To: litus (#1747)
And how many more times does government and the politicians of the U.S. have to prove to you their level of lies, corruption, and willful disregard to the Rule of Law and the Constitution of the United States of America for you to begin to wonder about their motivations and statements?
#1750. To: TwentyTwelve (#1748)
#1751. To: TwentyTwelve (#1748)
"When a man who is honestly mistaken hears the truth, he will either quit being mistaken or cease to be honest."
#1752. To: litus (#1751)
#1753. To: war (#1752)
#1754. To: war (#1752)
Prince Faisal bin Salman issued a statement April 30 that said he wants to clear the name of his late brother, Prince Ahmed bin Salman, who in a book was tied to al-Qaeda and said to have knowledge of the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks on the United States. Prince Ahmed headed The Thoroughbred Corp., owner of War Emblem, winner of the 2002 Kentucky Derby (gr. I). He died later that year.
#1755. To: Fred Mertz (#1754)
This guy may be prowling 4um: |
Morehead City Concerts Summer 2009
#1756. To: TwentyTwelve (#1748)
You MUST accept that the events and behavior of buildings on 911 were all anomalies, having never happened before and probably will never happen again. Too bad if they defied common sense. LIVE WITH IT.!!!!!!!!!!!!!/s LOLOLOL I KNOW I will never work or even enter another high rise if I can possibly help it since they seem to be able to collapse and pulverize themselves when there is a fire on one or two of the floors. And the "all knowing gov" doesn't seem the least bit concerned about it.
And how many more times does government and the politicians of the U.S. have to prove to you their level of lies, corruption, and willful disregard to the Rule of Law and the Constitution of the United States of America for you to begin to wonder about their motivations and statements?
#1757. To: war (#1752)
This report was carried at "about 4:15 eastern daylight time" (according to the anchor), over an hour before the building actually collapsed at 5:20. Who told them the WTC 7 building "has either collapsed or is collapsing."? Keep in mind he did not say it was going to collapse, he said it either had or was in the process of doing so. The anchor says is "we are getting information now", who is giving him this information? If you pay close attention you can see after the anchor announces this he turns around and sees the building as clear as day still standing, he then proceeds to backtrack on the initial information which informed him clearly the building "has either collapsed or is collapsing."
#1758. To: war (#1752)
This is the BBC (it is edited to show you, with arrows and timestamps).
#1759. To: litus, war (#1758)
How much easier can you make it for him (war)?
This is the BBC (it is edited to show you, with arrows and timestamps).
#1760. To: mininggold (#1756)
I hope you are right.
You MUST accept that the events and behavior of buildings on 911 were all anomalies, having never happened before and probably will never happen again.
#1761. To: war (#1752)
Don't you work in a highrise? I believe I have heard you make this claim. Aren't you afraid it will collapse and pulverize you to smithereens if there is a fire? Every high rise in the US needs to be red tagged for this potential threat if built before this trait could be engineered out of the plans.
He saw it and is sitting there considering the irpony of his statement.
#1762. To: TwentyTwelve, war (#1759)
I have no idea! : )
How much easier can you make it for him (war)?
#1763. To: mininggold (#1761)
Nope...14 story building... I LEFT my old job because a) it was a high rise and b) had a view directly into the gut of hell... And, FWIW, and whatthe Moonbats won't mention is that my old building 1 Liberty Plaza, which stands directly across from where WTC1 was, was reported to be on the verge of collapse. For the record, it is still standing and fully occupied.
Don't you work in a highrise?
#1764. To: TwentyTwelve (#1760)
The problem is, is the government is acting like that is the scenario. Lots of anomalies all on one day but it's still just a slightly less than normal day in paradise. Play proper respects for the dead and then get back to shopping. Oh, and lets go to war again. I really shouldn't have laughed.
I hope you are right.
#1765. To: litus (#1753)
Did you inhale some sort of noxious and toxic fumes over a long period of time at some point in your life? That asked...let's cut to the chase here...detail your 9/11 scenario so that it may be subjected to testing... Thanks...
With your kind of "logic", General George Washington and those under his command, would have been in error to suspect and question the veracity of: 1) intelligence gathered, 2) data compiled, 3) evidence presented, 4) and statements made by Benedict Arnold, even after he was proved to be traitor.
#1766. To: Fred Mertz (#1754)
Interesting...
.
.
.
Comments (1767 - 2261) not displayed.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest