4um: The thread that's changed its focus from the original title. Carry on ;)

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
Resistance
See other Resistance Articles
Title: The thread that's changed its focus from the original title. Carry on ;)
Source: [None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: Mar 21, 2009
Author: m e
Post Date: 2009-03-21 08:19:06 by Itistoolate
Keywords: None
Views: 11428
Comments: 2261

Officer Jack McLamb's shows:
arc.gcnlive.com/Archives2009/mar09/McLamb/030209.mp3
arc.gcnlive.com/Archives2009/mar09/McLamb/030309.mp3
arc.gcnlive.com/Archives2009/mar09/McLamb/030409.mp3
arc.gcnlive.com/Archives2009/mar09/McLamb/030509.mp3
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 385.
#4. To: Itistoolate (#0)
It could just be that Goldi has gone away for the weekend and doesn't know the site is down,or that there has been an equipment failure of some sort and they are working on getting it fixed.
Or it could just be that she got tired of putting up with all the crap,and just pulled the plug. I doubt the last one,though. I think she would post a notice if she were going to do this.

sneakypete posted on 2009-03-21 9:21:48 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#8. To: sneakypete (#4)
Or it could just be that she got tired of putting up with all the crap,and just pulled the plug.

Crap????

Like the resident Jews whining and sniveling to her all the time about the horrible anti semites?????
I dont think so. Ass kissing goys make me and this forum sick.

Cynicom posted on 2009-03-21 10:00:21 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#22. To: Cynicom (#8)
Crap????
Like the resident Jews whining and sniveling to her all the time about the horrible anti semites?????

I guess it's all in the viewpoint. I see more Jew haters calling her names than I see Jews sniveling about anti-Semites.
BTW,I was called a anti-Semite there the day before the site went down,and it wasn't the first time. I see no evidence of the Jews and Israeli-Firsters there having any more influence with her than anybody else. In fact,she even banned Margueritte a couple of years ago under another of her screen names.

sneakypete posted on 2009-03-21 11:28:30 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#25. To: sneakypete (#22)
I guess it's all in the viewpoint. I see more Jew haters calling her names than I see Jews sniveling about anti-Semites.

Perhaps there is a thought...
You also like magician, Marge and the others see nothing but Jew haters.
If you look at LP, that is nearly all you see, people that see anti semitism under their bed, in the closet and are afraid to deal with it.
No one on LP has ever raised the specter of anti goyism, have you ever wondered about that Pete????
I can go on LP and demand we nuke the Arab world, and not ONE WORD of disapproval, from anyone, not one.

Cynicom posted on 2009-03-21 11:51:06 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#28. To: Cynicom (#25)
I can go on LP and demand we nuke the Arab world, and not ONE WORD of disapproval, from anyone, not one.

Missed this one.
I can't speak for anyone else,but you would hear protest there from me.
What you seem to be missing is most of the people there (and everywhere else) that cheer the suggestion we nuke the A-Rabs aren't Jewish. Most are Christians,if in name only. They are people who bought into the whole terrorism thing at face value,and they are scared.
BTW,I think that unless the NWO does take over we will eventually end up nuking several Muslim countries. It is inevitable that sooner or later some fundie Muslim group or another is going to get their hands on a nuke or a bio weapon,and use it to attack a major US city. Once that happens,all bets are off. Even I will be cheering to see the mushroom clouds over Arabia.

sneakypete posted on 2009-03-21 12:03:12 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#33. To: sneakypete (#28)
I think that unless the NWO does take over we will eventually end up nuking several Muslim countries. It is inevitable that sooner or later some fundie Muslim group or another is going to get their hands on a nuke or a bio weapon,and use it to attack a major US city.

Maybe that's why I thought you to be the enemy. Do you still buy the lie that fundie muzzies hit us on 9/11 without Bush's help?

Critter posted on 2009-03-21 14:31:12 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#76. To: Critter (#33)
Do you still buy the lie that fundie muzzies hit us on 9/11 without Bush's help?

It pained me to believe it so without reservation, but the complicity by purposeful neglect indicts the globalist Bush Administration puppetmeisters is obvious IMO.
Oh...And, no, I don't believe Bush himself was capable of masterminding a lemonade stand.

Liberator posted on 2009-03-21 20:32:36 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#78. To: F16Fighter (#76)
complicity by purposeful neglect

Ahhhh,but purposeful neglect is NOT the same thing as "being behind it".
I don't think they made any real effort to stop any potential attack,but that's not the same thing as saying they planned or encouraged one.

sneakypete posted on 2009-03-21 20:38:48 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#85. To: sneakypete (#78)
Ahhhh,but purposeful neglect is NOT the same thing as "being behind it".
I don't think they made any real effort to stop any potential attack,but that's not the same thing as saying they planned or encouraged one.

Gray area there, Pete.
I've made the case with respect to 9/11 as analogous to leaving the store door wide open and unguarded - along with an open cash register - then claiming no responsibility for the thievery.

Liberator posted on 2009-03-21 20:47:23 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#127. To: F16Fighter, sneakypete (#85)
I don't think they made any real effort to stop any potential attack,but that's not the same thing as saying they planned or encouraged one.
I've made the case with respect to 9/11 as analogous to leaving the store door wide open and unguarded -

If you both are going to say the WTC 1, 2 and 7 came down because of fire then you're both either very ignorant or trolls. There is too much evidence to the contrary to believe otherwise.
Once you believe that the collapses were helped by explosives, then you have to believe that the Bush administration was complicit.
And even if you can't see the physical impossibility of collapse by fire, you have to be able to see that no plane is going to fly into DC air space unidentified and unintercepted, without inside top level complicity.
So which is it? Ignorance? Or shilliness?

Critter posted on 2009-03-21 23:53:09 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#137. To: Critter (#127)
And even if you can't see the physical impossibility of collapse by fire, you have to be able to see that no plane is going to fly into DC air space unidentified and unintercepted, without inside top level complicity.

wonderfully succinct

christine posted on 2009-03-22 0:06:41 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#149. To: christine (#137)
And even if you can't see the physical impossibility of collapse by fire, you have to be able to see that no plane is going to fly into DC air space unidentified and unintercepted, without inside top level complicity.

Before 911,
a Logistics employee I am good friends with, for Fed Ex told me about a system of vectored red lights that DC had in place to warn of any unauthorized aircraft from even getting near the capitol, and if the craft did not turn around, anti aircraft weapons were at the ready.
He flys a lot Alot.
I believe him.
However I have never broached the subject of the 911 attacks - for reasons of just getting along. I think he has got to go along with the ruse.

tom007 posted on 2009-03-22 0:15:44 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#163. To: tom007 (#149)
What is more likely? Our domestic air defense systems were hopelessly unprepared, or our government set it up, then perfectly executed the plan? Shit during the Clinton admin, a plane hit the white house, on accident.
Our government is incompetent, that much is clear.
It can't even torture people in Iraq in secret, do you think they can pull off a 9-11 without anyone knowing? Probably not.
Our foreign policy caused 9-11, and silly conspiracy theories take away from learning the real truth. Playing chess with other nations has fucking consequences.

Rhino369 posted on 2009-03-22 0:27:33 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#165. To: Rhino369 (#163)
It can't even torture people in Iraq in secret, do you think they can pull off a 9-11 without anyone knowing? Probably not.

Barry Jennings disagreed at one time, but then he was threatened, and now he is dead.
He was an eyewitness.

Rotara posted on 2009-03-22 0:28:47 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#173. To: Rotara (#165)

Barry Jennings disagreed at one time, but then he was threatened, and now he is dead.
He was an eyewitness.

One eyewitness is not nearly enough.
The demolition hypothesis doesn't even make sense. Why would they place demolitions then fly airplanes into them anyway? Do you think America would be less pissed off if they crashed airplanes into the towers, and they didn't fall? Probably not. It needlessly complicates a plan. And then tower 7 makes even less sense. If its impossible for tower 7 to fall down from fire, why would they bomb it? What good is it knocking down a building with nobody in it?
If I were going to fake a terrorist attack in the United States for political gain, I'd pick a small-big city like Duluth, Minnesota and set off a dirty bomb, then blame it on muslims crossing the border. You'd have political capital to invade any country you like, Iran, Pakistan, Iraq, North Korea, all the above.
What I wouldn't do is fly real planes into buildings into buildings rigged with explosives. The United States has the best material science engineers, the best civil engineers and the best physicists. You won't be able to fake something that defies the laws of the universe.

Rhino369 posted on 2009-03-22 0:44:23 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#182. To: Rhino369 (#173)
You won't be able to fake something that defies the laws of the universe.

They did fake something that defies the laws of the universe and some people still buy it, and some just shill for it. Which are you?

Critter posted on 2009-03-22 0:52:05 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#197. To: Critter (#182)

They did fake something that defies the laws of the universe and some people still buy it, and some just shill for it. Which are you?

I buy it. There is no motive for such a complicated plan. A much simpler plan could be done that has the same effect without 1/10 the risk. Faking a truck bombing like the OKC bombing and have the building fall instantly for one.
I'm not an expert in civil engineering, nor material sciences, but I've taken a course on metal stresses and strains, and what happens at the failure point in metals. I understand the basics of how the collapse happened, but I'm not nearly qualified to judge it. However the people who are qualified, aren't coming out and saying its impossible.
So the experts don't agree, there is no motive, and there is no reliable evidence. Why should I believe such a thing?
Furthermore, you believe your government murdered thousands of Americans for political gain, and successfully covered it up. Why are you not at war with it? I'm not for revolution, except under very drastic situations, one such situation would be the government murdering it citizens.
And if you are not at war with it because you know you'd die (which I wouldn't look down on you for, I wouldn't fight without sufficient numbers either), why don't you try to uncover some of the guilty parties? Woodward and Bernstein didn't expose Nixon by writing letters to the editor in obscure papers.

Rhino369 posted on 2009-03-22 1:09:08 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#200. To: Rhino369 (#197)
Faking a truck bombing like the OKC bombing and have the building fall instantly for one.

What better way to crank up the war machine than to rally the peeps with the New Pearl Harbor ? Does the DHS have something on you ?

Rotara posted on 2009-03-22 1:11:56 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#226. To: Rotara (#200)

What better way to crank up the war machine than to rally the peeps with the New Pearl Harbor ? Does the DHS have something on you ?

You don't think having the two towers instantly fall killing 20,000 would have made a good enough cause for war? Plus I would have used Iraqis.
People would have been pissed enough if they didn't fall, and just got hit by planes.

Rhino369 posted on 2009-03-22 1:38:17 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#232. To: Rhino369 (#226)
Why did they lie about demolishing WTC 7 ?

Rotara posted on 2009-03-22 1:45:22 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#242. To: Rotara (#232)
Why did they lie about demolishing WTC 7 ?

I should ask you the same. Why blow up a building with nobody in it, when it clearly wasn't hit by a plane? It has no benefit for the conspiracy, and tons of risk. Most people don't even know what WTC 7 is.

Rhino369 posted on 2009-03-22 1:55:54 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#247. To: Rhino369 (#242)
Why did they lie about demolishing WTC 7 ?
I should ask you the same.

No seriously.
Why did they demolish WTC 7 and THEN lie about demolishing it ?

Rotara posted on 2009-03-22 1:58:38 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#258. To: Rotara (#247)

No seriously.
Why did they demolish WTC 7 and THEN lie about demolishing it ?

They didn't. It burned until it collapsed.

Rhino369 posted on 2009-03-22 2:03:30 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#341. To: Rhino369 (#258)
They didn't. It burned until it collapsed.

Yeah, that Magickal Jet Fuel™. Just takes a few drops apparently. No plane hit it but a few drops of the Magickal Jet Fuel™ must have splashed on it.

James Deffenbach posted on 2009-03-22 13:53:55 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#345. To: James Deffenbach (#341)
Magickal Jet Fuel™.

I need some of that to get rid of an old brick wall in the yard. I hear they stopped making it on 9/11/01.

bluegrass posted on 2009-03-22 13:59:27 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#364. To: bluegrass (#345)
I need some of that to get rid of an old brick wall in the yard. I hear they stopped making it on 9/11/01.

You'll not be gettin' any of that, laddie. Faith and begorrah, it was all used up on 9/11 and good that it was toooooooo!!!! 'Tis a good thing that they only made one batch of that devil's brew. >(;^{]

James Deffenbach posted on 2009-03-22 14:29:46 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#383. To: James Deffenbach, Esso (#364)
Magickal Jet Fuel™

Will it also get rid of those tough stains?

bluegrass posted on 2009-03-22 14:52:45 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#385. To: bluegrass (#383)
You wouldn't want to be putting any of that on stains! One drop would blow up your whole wardrobe and leave you without zip code (homeless).

James Deffenbach posted on 2009-03-22 14:54:07 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
Replies to Comment # 385.
#394. To: James Deffenbach (#385)
One drop would blow up your whole wardrobe

Losing my four pairs of pants and my ten shirts wouldn't be a great loss. ; )

bluegrass posted on 2009-03-22 14:59:10 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
End Trace Mode for Comment # 385.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest

Freedom4um