4um: The thread that's changed its focus from the original title. Carry on ;)

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
Resistance
See other Resistance Articles
Title: The thread that's changed its focus from the original title. Carry on ;)
Source: [None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: Mar 21, 2009
Author: m e
Post Date: 2009-03-21 08:19:06 by Itistoolate
Keywords: None
Views: 11060
Comments: 2261

Officer Jack McLamb's shows:
arc.gcnlive.com/Archives2009/mar09/McLamb/030209.mp3
arc.gcnlive.com/Archives2009/mar09/McLamb/030309.mp3
arc.gcnlive.com/Archives2009/mar09/McLamb/030409.mp3
arc.gcnlive.com/Archives2009/mar09/McLamb/030509.mp3
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Comments (1-783) not displayed.
.
.
.

#784. To: palo verde (#780)
they didn't conclude I was a whore they concluded I was an idiot :)

Not me. Plenty of others respected your choice too.
You just like whoever you want to.

TooConservative posted on 2009-03-23 1:40:34 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#785. To: TooConservative (#781)
He and I aren't bosom buddies.

oh boy........very punny

"If you love wealth more than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, depart from us in peace. We ask not your counsel nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you. May your chains rest lightly upon you and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen.”—Samuel Adams

Rotara posted on 2009-03-23 1:41:07 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#786. To: Rotara (#779)
When you get a chance, ask the saracuda about Article 4, Section 4 if you would.

If I meet her I might do that. I just think it might be fun to meet people that like her. She was without a doubt the best candidate on either major party ticket last year. The media hates her so she can't be that bad.
God is always good!
RickyJ posted on 2009-03-23 1:41:58 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#787. To: Rotara (#776)
anti-American votes for MCA and NDAA.

That covers the time period of between 2006 - 2008?
As I was practically living in a cave at the time, it shouldn't be surprising that I was unable to be kept abreast of things politic or Tancredo.
Did any politicians vote the right way concerning either of those acts?

litus posted on 2009-03-23 1:42:34 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#788. To: RickyJ (#786)
uh oh

"If you love wealth more than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, depart from us in peace. We ask not your counsel nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you. May your chains rest lightly upon you and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen.”—Samuel Adams

Rotara posted on 2009-03-23 1:42:45 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#789. To: litus (#787)
Did any politicians vote the right way concerning either of those acts?

IIRC the number of critters that didn't go with the program could be added up on one hand and quite comfortably.

"If you love wealth more than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, depart from us in peace. We ask not your counsel nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you. May your chains rest lightly upon you and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen.”—Samuel Adams

Rotara posted on 2009-03-23 1:44:16 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#790. To: TooConservative (#781)
That's Birthier, Truthier and Jewier.
Their meaning should be quite obvious. Read this thread again except for the on-topic posts about how the S.S. LibertyPost sunk after hitting that nasty iceberg.
I should apply for a copyright to the phrase "Birthier, Truthier and Jewier." Obviously, you find it so memorable, you're even pestering meguro about it.
You may not have noticed but meguro didn't exactly greet me with joy. He and I aren't bosom buddies.

It's not that catchy in the actual real world I guess. I'll try harder to meet you in yours.
You may not have noticed but meguro didn't exactly greet me with joy. He and I aren't bosom buddies.
Why would I care? You keep thinking I care about fluff. Stop that. I ask a simple question and get reams of crap I don't need to know.
LOL.
Fine. What is your favorite color?
Happy now? Now, what is too Jewy? And for Gods sake don't tell me about fonts and crap.

nooz posted on 2009-03-23 1:44:22 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#791. To: litus (#787)
That link will be instructive for you.

"If you love wealth more than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, depart from us in peace. We ask not your counsel nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you. May your chains rest lightly upon you and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen.”—Samuel Adams

Rotara posted on 2009-03-23 1:44:52 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#792. To: Rotara (#789)
the number of critters that didn't go with the program could be added up on one hand and quite comfortably.

figures

litus posted on 2009-03-23 1:44:52 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#793. To: Rotara (#791)
ty; I'll post my thoughts concerning it after I've read it.

litus posted on 2009-03-23 1:46:27 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#794. To: palo verde, meguro (#769)
called Sarah Palin a caribou barbie in every post

You have to admit it was clever. I admired the phrase-coining. Memorable, short, chock full of quirky mouthy Americana.
All I could come up with was Yomama, Dark Messiah, First Negro, etc.
Of course, they were just recombining the words and phrases of pro comedy writers, all liberal Hollyweirdos so they don't get any points for being original. And I don't think their bitterness swayed anyone anyway.
Don't think they were more effective than you were, palo. Cynics spewing sarcasm may amuse but they don't convince.

TooConservative posted on 2009-03-23 1:47:56 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#795. To: litus (#793)
LibertyForum went 'down' last year and now LibertyPost is down. How much time do we have left?

All but ONE post in forum is on this thread right now. LOL
Night and be well

"If you love wealth more than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, depart from us in peace. We ask not your counsel nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you. May your chains rest lightly upon you and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen.”—Samuel Adams

Rotara posted on 2009-03-23 1:48:04 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#796. To: TooConservative (#784)
Thank you very much for this post TC
I know Sarah Palin wasn't your cup of tea
I may be wrong because it was right before the election
and I was absolutely determined to keep Obama out
and the way to do that was to get Sarah Palin in
plus I adored her
so I am very fuzzy about your posts then, just that you did not join the Sarah Palin bandwagon as I did ?
but I absolutely appreciate the forbearance you showed,
and your absolute liberty you gave everyone to like who they did like
Love, Palo

palo verde posted on 2009-03-23 1:49:20 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#797. To: Rotara (#795)
All but ONE post in forum is on this thread right now. LOL

hehehe
Night.

litus posted on 2009-03-23 1:50:16 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#798. To: nooz, meguro (#790)
Why would I care? You keep thinking I care about fluff. Stop that.

Oh? I don't think I was the one quizzing someone else about a third person's earlier remarks, demanding explanations from them for someone else's comments.

Happy now? Now, what is too Jewy?

And in which post did I say "too Jewy"? I certainly don't recall that. Please point me toward any such post by me on this thread or any other here at 4um.

TooConservative posted on 2009-03-23 1:51:53 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#799. To: TooConservative, meguro (#794)
(Palo) Meguro called Sarah Palin a caribou barbie in every post
(TC) You have to admit it was clever. I admired the phrase-coining.
Memorable, short, chock full of quirky mouthy Americana.

lol you are right, TC
now that I have back my sense of humor and balance
I give Meguro credit for creativity
Caribou Barbie is imaginative and colorful
Love, Palo

palo verde posted on 2009-03-23 1:54:56 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#800. To: All (#799)
Sweet dreams all
Thank you for making this thread so enjoyable and interesting to be on
Thank you again Christine for your hospitality to us
and thank you all 4um-ers for your gracious welcome
Love, Palo

palo verde posted on 2009-03-23 1:57:42 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#801. To: palo verde (#796)
I know Sarah Palin wasn't your cup of tea

Nah, I liked Sarah. I liked her grit, her ability to really take and come back with some good hits of her own, the fact she believed in some things strongly (I wasn't too fond of the pro-Iraq-war part). I wasn't so fond of McStain's handlers stabbing her in the back every five minutes.
She wasn't ready for 2008. We'll see if she's up for it in 2012. And I do recall that she gave Ron Paul a very very warm welcome in Alaska that time. She's also not CFR, not part of some creepy batch of trust fund babies in the Senate, not some mangled war hero brandishing his medals in our faces, not some two-bit mediocre Harvard race-hustler...ahem...well, I guess I find more merit in the things Sarah Palin is not than in the things I know she is. And she did far better on short notice than McStain had any right to expect. She outperformed expectations considerably. The truth is, Sarah Palin was never free to be her own candidate. We still don't really know her.

TooConservative posted on 2009-03-23 1:57:57 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#802. To: nooz (#782)
Seems TooConservative has the answers.
Let's get them!

Good luck.

meguro posted on 2009-03-23 1:58:28 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#803. To: TooConservative (#798)
Oh? I don't think I was the one quizzing someone else about a third person's earlier remarks, demanding explanations from them for someone else's comments.

I explained that before, or don't you remember? I didn't demand, I asked if they might know what you meant. F o l l o w T h e D o t s.
And in which post did I say "too Jewy"? I certainly don't recall that. Please point me toward any such post by me on this thread or any other here at 4um.

It was the third thing mentioned in the snappy phrase you wanted to patent or something.
You are having an awful time at answering a simple question.
Would you like to forget it and let it be for now? Because I guarantee that I will continue to ask people from LP what TOO JEWY means over there. It upset you, and I need to understand why.
Its not that I'm being generous and actually care who this offends, it's that I am curious where such statements find their roots.

nooz posted on 2009-03-23 1:58:35 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#804. To: Rotara (#785)
oh boy........very punny

You have no idea. ;)

TooConservative posted on 2009-03-23 1:59:50 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#805. To: meguro (#802)
Good luck.

Well thanks.
Sorry to have bothered you over that one.

nooz posted on 2009-03-23 2:00:29 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#806. To: palo verde (#800)
sweet dreams, palo

litus posted on 2009-03-23 2:04:26 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#807. To: nooz (#805)
Well thanks.
Sorry to have bothered you over that one.

No problem. Just bear in mind I'm in the minority on LP! :-)

meguro posted on 2009-03-23 2:33:08 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#808. To: palo verde (#769)
LOL you tortured me on my Sarah Palin threads, Meguro but that is water under the bridge now too (and some of the pics were cute!)

I'm so sorry, Palo. I didn't mean to hurt you... honest.
you and Fred Mertz and War were the trio who worked against Sarah Palin as hard as I worked for her :)
Sorry again to have to say it, but I'm glad we succeeded. I never questioned your support of Ron Paul, who I acknowledge raised some very valid points about our foreign policy, but Sarah Palin, forget it. :-)
I still love you dearly, despite our differences.

meguro posted on 2009-03-23 2:38:41 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#809. To: nooz, meguro (#803)
It was the third thing mentioned in the snappy phrase you wanted to patent or something.
You are having an awful time at answering a simple question.

Actually, I loaded the full text of this thread to clarify this matter.
I originally posted:
I've only been here today but so far it seems Birthier, Truthier, and Jewier than LP was. And all of that just on a thread about LP being offline. ;)

The first mention of "Jewy" was your own post:
"You think there should be a birther, Truther, Jewy test?"

The first mention of "Too Jewy" was your own post:
"Too Jewy, Too Truthy, Too Birther. Pretty much your words."

Note again, I used these terms in comparison of LP to 4um. I never once said "too Jewy" (since I would not use such an inartful phrase). You are the one who said "Jewy" and "too Jewy" throughout this thread, pretending it was me who said it. You also falsely attributed "Too Truthy" and "Too Birther" as phrases I wrote when you are, in fact, the only one who wrote them. So "Jewy" and "Too Jewy" were not, in fact, my words. They are your words which you wish for some reason to pretend were my words. Then you want to conduct some pointless little witch hunt over why I said those words (which were actually your words) to begin with. Go back and check my posts. You'll find I didn't edit them ex post facto.
Senile? Drunk? Confused with your own bullcrap? What, like I should care so much to even want to find out?
If you want to ask me what I mean, you'll have to actually read what I wrote and then stop interrogating yourself.
And you should stop pestering meguro, not that I'm his White Knight or anything. He had nothing to do with your blatant attempt to put your words in my mouth.

TooConservative posted on 2009-03-23 2:41:41 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#810. To: meguro (#807)
No problem. Just bear in mind I'm in the minority on LP! :-)

I always thought you were in the majority.

TooConservative posted on 2009-03-23 2:42:40 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#811. To: palo verde, Fred Mertz, war (#769)
someone whose name I will not mention called Sarah Palin a caribou barbie in every post and posted pics to illustrate it LOL you tortured me on my Sarah Palin threads, Meguro but that is water under the bridge now too (and some of the pics were cute!) Love, Palo
you and Fred Mertz and War were the trio who worked against Sarah Palin as hard as I worked for her :)

Moi? LOL! Not quite every thread... only 90% or so of them. :-)

meguro posted on 2009-03-23 2:42:43 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#812. To: TooConservative (#810)
I always thought you were in the majority.

How do you figure?

meguro posted on 2009-03-23 2:43:10 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#813. To: TooConservative (#809)
And you should stop pestering meguro, not that I'm his White Knight or anything. He had nothing to do with your blatant attempt to put your words in my mouth.

You should also stop pestering me. :-)

meguro posted on 2009-03-23 2:44:33 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#814. To: TooConservative (#809)
Okay, SEEMS jewier. Not a big difference. But I really like the graphics and boxes and stuff.
So, what did you mean by SEEMS JEWIER.
It's not a hard question.
And for the record, I did apologize to merguro, if you followed the thread and so forth.

Again with the dramatics. Blatent attempt to put words in your mouth? I asked a simple question that you just won't answer and still won't.
Why?
What seems JEWIER??

nooz posted on 2009-03-23 2:48:42 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#815. To: meguro (#813)
You should also stop pestering me. :-)

You're not allowed to speak to the White Knight that way.

TooConservative posted on 2009-03-23 2:54:27 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#816. To: nooz (#814)
And for the record, I did apologize to merguro, if you followed the thread and so forth

Name's meguro, dude. :-)
It's the neighborhood of Tokyo in which I live. Literally means, "black eye."

meguro posted on 2009-03-23 3:07:18 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#817. To: nooz (#814)
Okay, SEEMS jewier. Not a big difference. But I really like the graphics and boxes and stuff.

Macro insertions. I just type '>>lptable' and it instantly creates a formatted bordered HTML table for me and places my cursor at the correct insertion point. I have a couple blockquote styles too. Just something to create a little visual interest beyond bolding/italics. Since Neil wrote both forums' software, the same stuff works both places.

What seems JEWIER??

4um seems Jewier than LP. 4um also seems Birthier than LP. Not to mention Truthier than LP.
Is that really so difficult to understand? You're the only one who seems to have a problem grasping it. You do understand comparative sentences?
You do realize you missed the actual point of my original remark?

I've only been here today but so far it seems Birthier, Truthier, and Jewier than LP was. And all of that just on a thread about LP being offline. ;)

It was intended to point out how a thread about LP being down was full of Truther/Birther/Jew material which was completely off-topic. The little smiley was intended to convey light humor, well, obviously not too successfully, at least judging by your reaction.

TooConservative posted on 2009-03-23 3:08:11 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#818. To: sneakypete (#708)
My vague recollection is one or two RP supporters were banned for continually filling up the breaking news box with RP campaign press releases,and not stopping when asked.

Well your recollection is faulty. 99.9% of the Ron Paul related posts were made by ANTI Ron Paul posters, whose posts WERE allowed to stand while the few PRO Ron Paul threads were quickly deleted by Goldi.
Goldi would use the ANTI Ron Paul posts as an example of "spam" yet allow those obvious spam posts to stand, right up till the electon.
If it came from a blog and was nothing but pure bullshit, it stayed on LP. If it was a legitimate news article about Ron Paul, it was deleted and the poster would be banned and/or chastised.
"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen
FormerLurker posted on 2009-03-23 5:31:16 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#819. To: palo verde, TooConservative (#717)
There weren't any articles about Ron Paul in the mainstream press the only articles which could be posted about him were those press releases I don't think we went overboard for Ron Paul the candidate with the most energy behind him wins

Palo,it is true that the mainstream media treated him like he was a social disease,but the truth is he was never going to win to start with,and even if he had of won he would have gotten zero support from the professional pols in either branch of the ruling party. Helping him be successful would have ended their own political careers,and there is no way they would have done this.
Putting a 3rd Party candidate into the White House is a waste of time until there are enough members of congress from the same party as him to provide him with a little support.
I still voted for him,but he had about as much chance of winning the presidency as I did.

sneakypete posted on 2009-03-23 7:29:14 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#820. To: nooz (#722)
Really? Who have I ever had banned?
Pete, play dumb if you like. It's doubtful you are fooling anyone that posted at LP before.

Then it should be easy for you to post a few screen names,right?
Put up or shut up.

sneakypete posted on 2009-03-23 7:31:10 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#821. To: palo verde (#741)
I eventually returned to LP despite the banning of Ron Paul articles, I like the forum and posters disobeyed the banning anyway, we always had Ron Paul threads going on

I know. I even posted a couple myself.

sneakypete posted on 2009-03-23 7:44:18 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#822. To: litus, palo verde, TooConservative (#743)
RP was a genuine threat to Tancredo at the time.

That's true,but it's laughable to call either one of them a serious threat to an annointed RINO like McLunatic. Romney had some solid RINO credentials AND presidential hair,so there was a chance he could have beaten McLunatic. The Huckster did a really good job of hiding his true politics by saying all the right things in speeches and interviews,but he never really had a chance with anybody other than those waiting for him to tell them to touch their teebee sets and be healed.
It was obvious early on that only a RINO would get any party support or serious treatment in the press.
It was a fixed game from the very start.

sneakypete posted on 2009-03-23 7:50:21 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#823. To: palo verde (#759)
Yes after Tancredo dropped out Goldi went for that other guy, Hunter

And Hunter was a guy that made Tancredo seem sincere and the Kennedy family against nepotism by comparison.
I got flamed all over the place for outing Hunter as a liar and a poser on his military record. Even had people calling me a phony vet who knew nothing about the army.

sneakypete posted on 2009-03-23 7:56:59 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#824. To: litus (#763)
I liked Palin, but I hate McRino and would have never voted for him for anything or anybody in the world.

We are in agreement on this one. I hate McLunatic so much I would have voted for Soetoro if it had looked like McLunatic was going to win.
BTW,I haven't seen anybody scare the RINO's and their twin brothers the Dims as much as Palin has scared them since Newt first became Speaker of the House. This was back before they got blackmail material on him. The Dims and RINO's get absolutely hysterical every time the name "Palin" is mentioned.
IMHO,she couldn't receive higher praise.

sneakypete posted on 2009-03-23 8:00:32 ET Reply Trace Private Reply

.
.
.
Comments (825 - 2261) not displayed.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest

Freedom4um