[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Hezbollah tactics, weapons stall Israeli advance

President Kennedy's Final Address to the United Nations General Assembly

RFK Jr. Explains Plan For Reforming The CIA

Harris Campaign Recruits Foreign Volunteers, Tells Noncitizens How To Skirt Donation Rules

Lame Yuck! With Nothing To Lose, Biden Goes On Baby-Mouthing Spree At White House Halloween Party

The Fastest Way To Reverse A Fatty Liver Naturally | Dr. William Li

CIA Advisor Warns: This is the beginning of the 2025 Civil War

When Evil Is Allowed In, Evil Stays

US layoffs rose 42% in three years, reaching 1.83M in September.

Iran Will Carry Out 'Definitive, Painful' Retaliatory Strike, Likely Before Election: CNN

How 2024 Election Will Lead To Second Civil War

Tulsi Gabbard Drops a Killer Trump Ad

Israel Genocide Tracker Account Sparks 'Panic' Among Israeli Soldiers

Battleground Voting Shift: Hispanic Voters Now Driven by Issues, Not Party Lines

North Carolina Appeals Court Rules to Allow Voters Who have Never Lived in the U.S. To Vote in State Elections

The 5 Tiers of Stolen Elections (Dems already did 1 & 2)

A Palestinian Family Goes to Pick Up Olives. It Ends in an Execution by Israeli Soldiers

Israel Suffers A Multimillion Dollar Economic SUCKER PUNCH!

The Babylon Bee Endorses Communist Harris

Nosy NY Times Journos Uncover Elon Musk's Secret Luxury Compound In Austin

A 20% surge in gov't spending inflates the national debt, inflation, and interest rates, now reaching 10% of GDP

MI EARLY VOTE SHOCKER! An Excess of 125,428 Votes Cast!

DMSO is the ivermectin for strokes and neurological damage

The Curious Case Of Ariane Tabatabai

Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) Projects Are Foundering In Five-Eye Nations. What Gives?

Pennsylvania News Station Apologizes For Showing Presidential Election 'Results'

Feminist Author, Former Advisor to Al Gore's Campaign, and Noted Intellectual Naomi Wolf Endorses Donald Trump for President!

US Supreme Court Lets Virginia Purge Noncitizens From Voter Rolls

8 Alarming Signs: US Economy Poised for a Hard Landing

Israels extermination campaign in Northern Gaza includes ditch-executions of civilians


Resistance
See other Resistance Articles

Title: The thread that's changed its focus from the original title. Carry on ;)
Source: [None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: Mar 21, 2009
Author: m e
Post Date: 2009-03-21 08:19:06 by Itistoolate
Keywords: None
Views: 28538
Comments: 2261

Officer Jack McLamb's shows:

arc.gcnlive.com/Archives2009/mar09/McLamb/030209.mp3

arc.gcnlive.com/Archives2009/mar09/McLamb/030309.mp3

arc.gcnlive.com/Archives2009/mar09/McLamb/030409.mp3

arc.gcnlive.com/Archives2009/mar09/McLamb/030509.mp3

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Comments (1-796) not displayed.
      .
      .
      .

#797. To: Rotara (#795)

All but ONE post in forum is on this thread right now. LOL

hehehe

Night.

litus  posted on  2009-03-23   1:50:16 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#798. To: nooz, meguro (#790)

Why would I care? You keep thinking I care about fluff. Stop that.

Oh? I don't think I was the one quizzing someone else about a third person's earlier remarks, demanding explanations from them for someone else's comments.

Happy now? Now, what is too Jewy?

And in which post did I say "too Jewy"? I certainly don't recall that. Please point me toward any such post by me on this thread or any other here at 4um.

TooConservative  posted on  2009-03-23   1:51:53 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#799. To: TooConservative, meguro (#794)

(Palo) Meguro called Sarah Palin a caribou barbie in every post

(TC) You have to admit it was clever. I admired the phrase-coining.
Memorable, short, chock full of quirky mouthy Americana.

lol you are right, TC
now that I have back my sense of humor and balance
I give Meguro credit for creativity
Caribou Barbie is imaginative and colorful
Love, Palo

palo verde  posted on  2009-03-23   1:54:56 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#800. To: All (#799)

Sweet dreams all
Thank you for making this thread so enjoyable and interesting to be on
Thank you again Christine for your hospitality to us
and thank you all 4um-ers for your gracious welcome
Love, Palo

palo verde  posted on  2009-03-23   1:57:42 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#801. To: palo verde (#796)

I know Sarah Palin wasn't your cup of tea

Nah, I liked Sarah. I liked her grit, her ability to really take and come back with some good hits of her own, the fact she believed in some things strongly (I wasn't too fond of the pro-Iraq-war part). I wasn't so fond of McStain's handlers stabbing her in the back every five minutes.

She wasn't ready for 2008. We'll see if she's up for it in 2012. And I do recall that she gave Ron Paul a very very warm welcome in Alaska that time. She's also not CFR, not part of some creepy batch of trust fund babies in the Senate, not some mangled war hero brandishing his medals in our faces, not some two-bit mediocre Harvard race-hustler...ahem...well, I guess I find more merit in the things Sarah Palin is not than in the things I know she is. And she did far better on short notice than McStain had any right to expect. She outperformed expectations considerably. The truth is, Sarah Palin was never free to be her own candidate. We still don't really know her.

TooConservative  posted on  2009-03-23   1:57:57 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#802. To: nooz (#782)

Seems TooConservative has the answers.

Let's get them!

Good luck.

meguro  posted on  2009-03-23   1:58:28 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#803. To: TooConservative (#798)

Oh? I don't think I was the one quizzing someone else about a third person's earlier remarks, demanding explanations from them for someone else's comments.

I explained that before, or don't you remember? I didn't demand, I asked if they might know what you meant. F o l l o w T h e D o t s.

And in which post did I say "too Jewy"? I certainly don't recall that. Please point me toward any such post by me on this thread or any other here at 4um.

It was the third thing mentioned in the snappy phrase you wanted to patent or something.

You are having an awful time at answering a simple question.

Would you like to forget it and let it be for now? Because I guarantee that I will continue to ask people from LP what TOO JEWY means over there. It upset you, and I need to understand why.

Its not that I'm being generous and actually care who this offends, it's that I am curious where such statements find their roots.

nooz  posted on  2009-03-23   1:58:35 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#804. To: Rotara (#785)

oh boy........very punny

You have no idea. ;)

TooConservative  posted on  2009-03-23   1:59:50 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#805. To: meguro (#802)

Good luck.

Well thanks.

Sorry to have bothered you over that one.

nooz  posted on  2009-03-23   2:00:29 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#806. To: palo verde (#800)

sweet dreams, palo

litus  posted on  2009-03-23   2:04:26 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#807. To: nooz (#805)

Well thanks.

Sorry to have bothered you over that one.

No problem. Just bear in mind I'm in the minority on LP! :-)

meguro  posted on  2009-03-23   2:33:08 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#808. To: palo verde (#769)

LOL you tortured me on my Sarah Palin threads, Meguro but that is water under the bridge now too (and some of the pics were cute!)

I'm so sorry, Palo. I didn't mean to hurt you... honest.

you and Fred Mertz and War were the trio who worked against Sarah Palin as hard as I worked for her :)

Sorry again to have to say it, but I'm glad we succeeded. I never questioned your support of Ron Paul, who I acknowledge raised some very valid points about our foreign policy, but Sarah Palin, forget it. :-)

I still love you dearly, despite our differences.

meguro  posted on  2009-03-23   2:38:41 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#809. To: nooz, meguro (#803)

It was the third thing mentioned in the snappy phrase you wanted to patent or something.

You are having an awful time at answering a simple question.

Actually, I loaded the full text of this thread to clarify this matter.

I originally posted:

I've only been here today but so far it seems Birthier, Truthier, and Jewier than LP was. And all of that just on a thread about LP being offline. ;)

The first mention of "Jewy" was your own post:

"You think there should be a birther, Truther, Jewy test?"

The first mention of "Too Jewy" was your own post:

"Too Jewy, Too Truthy, Too Birther. Pretty much your words."

Note again, I used these terms in comparison of LP to 4um. I never once said "too Jewy" (since I would not use such an inartful phrase). You are the one who said "Jewy" and "too Jewy" throughout this thread, pretending it was me who said it. You also falsely attributed "Too Truthy" and "Too Birther" as phrases I wrote when you are, in fact, the only one who wrote them. So "Jewy" and "Too Jewy" were not, in fact, my words. They are your words which you wish for some reason to pretend were my words. Then you want to conduct some pointless little witch hunt over why I said those words (which were actually your words) to begin with. Go back and check my posts. You'll find I didn't edit them ex post facto.

Senile? Drunk? Confused with your own bullcrap? What, like I should care so much to even want to find out?

If you want to ask me what I mean, you'll have to actually read what I wrote and then stop interrogating yourself.

And you should stop pestering meguro, not that I'm his White Knight or anything. He had nothing to do with your blatant attempt to put your words in my mouth.

TooConservative  posted on  2009-03-23   2:41:41 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#810. To: meguro (#807)

No problem. Just bear in mind I'm in the minority on LP! :-)

I always thought you were in the majority.

TooConservative  posted on  2009-03-23   2:42:40 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#811. To: palo verde, Fred Mertz, war (#769)

someone whose name I will not mention called Sarah Palin a caribou barbie in every post and posted pics to illustrate it LOL you tortured me on my Sarah Palin threads, Meguro but that is water under the bridge now too (and some of the pics were cute!) Love, Palo

you and Fred Mertz and War were the trio who worked against Sarah Palin as hard as I worked for her :)

Moi? LOL! Not quite every thread... only 90% or so of them. :-)

meguro  posted on  2009-03-23   2:42:43 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#812. To: TooConservative (#810)

I always thought you were in the majority.

How do you figure?

meguro  posted on  2009-03-23   2:43:10 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#813. To: TooConservative (#809)

And you should stop pestering meguro, not that I'm his White Knight or anything. He had nothing to do with your blatant attempt to put your words in my mouth.

You should also stop pestering me. :-)

meguro  posted on  2009-03-23   2:44:33 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#814. To: TooConservative (#809)

Okay, SEEMS jewier. Not a big difference. But I really like the graphics and boxes and stuff.

So, what did you mean by SEEMS JEWIER.

It's not a hard question.

And for the record, I did apologize to merguro, if you followed the thread and so forth.

Again with the dramatics. Blatent attempt to put words in your mouth? I asked a simple question that you just won't answer and still won't.

Why?

What seems JEWIER??

nooz  posted on  2009-03-23   2:48:42 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#815. To: meguro (#813)

You should also stop pestering me. :-)

You're not allowed to speak to the White Knight that way.

TooConservative  posted on  2009-03-23   2:54:27 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#816. To: nooz (#814)

And for the record, I did apologize to merguro, if you followed the thread and so forth

Name's meguro, dude. :-)

It's the neighborhood of Tokyo in which I live. Literally means, "black eye."

meguro  posted on  2009-03-23   3:07:18 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#817. To: nooz (#814)

Okay, SEEMS jewier. Not a big difference. But I really like the graphics and boxes and stuff.

Macro insertions. I just type '>>lptable' and it instantly creates a formatted bordered HTML table for me and places my cursor at the correct insertion point. I have a couple blockquote styles too. Just something to create a little visual interest beyond bolding/italics. Since Neil wrote both forums' software, the same stuff works both places.

What seems JEWIER??

4um seems Jewier than LP. 4um also seems Birthier than LP. Not to mention Truthier than LP.

Is that really so difficult to understand? You're the only one who seems to have a problem grasping it. You do understand comparative sentences?

You do realize you missed the actual point of my original remark?


I've only been here today but so far it seems Birthier, Truthier, and Jewier than LP was. And all of that just on a thread about LP being offline. ;)

It was intended to point out how a thread about LP being down was full of Truther/Birther/Jew material which was completely off-topic. The little smiley was intended to convey light humor, well, obviously not too successfully, at least judging by your reaction.

TooConservative  posted on  2009-03-23   3:08:11 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#818. To: sneakypete (#708)

My vague recollection is one or two RP supporters were banned for continually filling up the breaking news box with RP campaign press releases,and not stopping when asked.

Well your recollection is faulty. 99.9% of the Ron Paul related posts were made by ANTI Ron Paul posters, whose posts WERE allowed to stand while the few PRO Ron Paul threads were quickly deleted by Goldi.

Goldi would use the ANTI Ron Paul posts as an example of "spam" yet allow those obvious spam posts to stand, right up till the electon.

If it came from a blog and was nothing but pure bullshit, it stayed on LP. If it was a legitimate news article about Ron Paul, it was deleted and the poster would be banned and/or chastised.


"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen

FormerLurker  posted on  2009-03-23   5:31:16 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#819. To: palo verde, TooConservative (#717)

There weren't any articles about Ron Paul in the mainstream press the only articles which could be posted about him were those press releases I don't think we went overboard for Ron Paul the candidate with the most energy behind him wins

Palo,it is true that the mainstream media treated him like he was a social disease,but the truth is he was never going to win to start with,and even if he had of won he would have gotten zero support from the professional pols in either branch of the ruling party. Helping him be successful would have ended their own political careers,and there is no way they would have done this.

Putting a 3rd Party candidate into the White House is a waste of time until there are enough members of congress from the same party as him to provide him with a little support.

I still voted for him,but he had about as much chance of winning the presidency as I did.

sneakypete  posted on  2009-03-23   7:29:14 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#820. To: nooz (#722)

Really? Who have I ever had banned?

Pete, play dumb if you like. It's doubtful you are fooling anyone that posted at LP before.

Then it should be easy for you to post a few screen names,right?

Put up or shut up.

sneakypete  posted on  2009-03-23   7:31:10 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#821. To: palo verde (#741)

I eventually returned to LP despite the banning of Ron Paul articles, I like the forum and posters disobeyed the banning anyway, we always had Ron Paul threads going on

I know. I even posted a couple myself.

sneakypete  posted on  2009-03-23   7:44:18 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#822. To: litus, palo verde, TooConservative (#743)

RP was a genuine threat to Tancredo at the time.

That's true,but it's laughable to call either one of them a serious threat to an annointed RINO like McLunatic. Romney had some solid RINO credentials AND presidential hair,so there was a chance he could have beaten McLunatic. The Huckster did a really good job of hiding his true politics by saying all the right things in speeches and interviews,but he never really had a chance with anybody other than those waiting for him to tell them to touch their teebee sets and be healed.

It was obvious early on that only a RINO would get any party support or serious treatment in the press.

It was a fixed game from the very start.

sneakypete  posted on  2009-03-23   7:50:21 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#823. To: palo verde (#759)

Yes after Tancredo dropped out Goldi went for that other guy, Hunter

And Hunter was a guy that made Tancredo seem sincere and the Kennedy family against nepotism by comparison.

I got flamed all over the place for outing Hunter as a liar and a poser on his military record. Even had people calling me a phony vet who knew nothing about the army.

sneakypete  posted on  2009-03-23   7:56:59 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#824. To: litus (#763)

I liked Palin, but I hate McRino and would have never voted for him for anything or anybody in the world.

We are in agreement on this one. I hate McLunatic so much I would have voted for Soetoro if it had looked like McLunatic was going to win.

BTW,I haven't seen anybody scare the RINO's and their twin brothers the Dims as much as Palin has scared them since Newt first became Speaker of the House. This was back before they got blackmail material on him. The Dims and RINO's get absolutely hysterical every time the name "Palin" is mentioned.

IMHO,she couldn't receive higher praise.

sneakypete  posted on  2009-03-23   8:00:32 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#825. To: litus (#771)

By the time he endorsed him, maybe not....but you must admit there was lots of anger or outrage over that...why? Because...it was "unbelievable" IF he was being true to how he had presented himself for years before; he betrayed others' belief and trust in him. That's why.

NEVER underestimate the power of the FBI and the IRS to dig up blackmail,and the US Justice Department to spin it into criminal charges. If not on the candidate directly,on a close family member. People will do a lot of things to keep themselves or a close relative away from bankruptcy AND criminal court. Even if they charges fail you lose because your reputation is destroyed and you are bankrupt by the time they get done with you.

Yeah,Tancredo switched overnight,and there has to be a reason for it. I have no insider information,I'm just saying blackmail and extortion were the most likely reasons.

sneakypete  posted on  2009-03-23   8:05:44 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#826. To: sneakypete (#825)

Yeah,Tancredo switched overnight,and there has to be a reason for it. I have no insider information,I'm just saying blackmail and extortion were the most likely reasons.

Caught in the men's room getting his noodle wet?

meguro  posted on  2009-03-23   8:12:10 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#827. To: TooConservative (#801)

, I guess I find more merit in the things Sarah Palin is not than in the things I know she is

Sometimes that's all you have.

And she did far better on short notice than McStain had any right to expect. She outperformed expectations considerably.

She became more popular with the public virtually overnight than McLunatic was,scaring the hell out of both the RINO's and their twin brothers the Dims.

sneakypete  posted on  2009-03-23   8:13:24 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#828. To: litus (#696)

I didn't say you have posted comments on it; but you haven't been the only poster posting statutes and laws concerning this subject.

Can you please link me to others who have posted statutes? Or at least give me the thread?

war  posted on  2009-03-23   8:16:19 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#829. To: FormerLurker (#818)

Well your recollection is faulty. 99.9% of the Ron Paul related posts were made by ANTI Ron Paul posters, whose posts WERE allowed to stand while the few PRO Ron Paul threads were quickly deleted by Goldi.

I didn't post many,but the few pro-Ron Paul threads I posted were not deleted.

sneakypete  posted on  2009-03-23   8:17:01 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#830. To: christine, Goldi-Lox, Bill Mayer, trixie (#734)

Thanks...I had read the Home Page but not the other. I had looked for "rules" and just assumed there were few if any.

As I said, I have no issue with rules as long as they are enforced uniformly and not at the whim of the moderator. Lucy the Bat destroyed stolybreath.com and learned a quick lesson in libel back when she started her purges. Bill at Pipebomb destroyed his site - which was very free wheeling - when he decided to innoculate the forum with his political orthodoxy and then began to suffer the same fate as Lucy the Bat in selective enforcement and then totally killed his site when he banned us anti-Booosh's as agit-props. I had a great time there right up until the day I was banned.

LP was a good place until it got ignored which was increasing steadily over the last couple of years. Personally, I ***think*** Goldi had a lot of things happen personally over the last couple of years and that took a lot out of her. Frankly, I like her and I hope all turns out well for her.

war  posted on  2009-03-23   8:26:48 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#831. To: meguro (#826)

Caught in the men's room getting his noodle wet?

Not likely. It could have been anything from getting a questionable zoning exemption to having a child arrested on drug charges.

I have no idea what it was,but look at what they did to Newt based SOLELY on what was supposed to have been nothing more than a minor tax mistake. Even you and I wouldn't have faced criminal charges for something like that,yet it resulted in Newt losing his Speaker position and even his congressional seat. Not only that,but for a couple of years nobody saw or heard from him on any of the tv political talk shows.

Now he is suddenly all over the airwaves again,which tells us that the people who worked so hard to silence him now need him for a PR front effort. Too many conservatives have left the RINO Party after two Boy Jorge terms and an attempted McLunatic term. They need Newt to speak in order to fool people into voting R once again.

IMHO,he has been reduced to nothing more than a puppet on a string.

sneakypete  posted on  2009-03-23   8:29:32 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#832. To: James Deffenbach (#595)

No, you stupid Obamabot, I didn't lie.

You can post all the links that you want to Douchenbag and you can bozo me to the 4th coming...HOSPITALS MAY NOT RELEASE VITAL RECORDS. PERIOD.

war  posted on  2009-03-23   8:31:49 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#833. To: sneakypete (#831)

Now he is suddenly all over the airwaves again,which tells us that the people who worked so hard to silence him now need him for a PR front effort. Too many conservatives have left the RINO Party after two Boy Jorge terms and an attempted McLunatic term. They need Newt to speak in order to fool people into voting R once again.

You mean there aren't enough GOP-firsters like packbot, mudbot, boteye, beyond the sea, yukon. etc.?

meguro  posted on  2009-03-23   8:32:28 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#834. To: meguro (#826)

Caught in the men's room getting his noodle wet?

Or wetting someone else's noodle...both par for the GOP pol course...

war  posted on  2009-03-23   8:32:52 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#835. To: FormerLurker (#591)

The idiotic report you linked gave a minimum collapse speed LESS than the time it would take for a free fall through air, and the chart simply reflected the actual times of the collapse vs an object dropping through thin air.

Wha...chuckle...huh? Go back and rrada it again moron...a point further OUT the the right on an X-axis is a GREATER number, doof.

war  posted on  2009-03-23   8:34:39 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#836. To: FormerLurker (#591)

BTW. Have you ever REALLY looked at any of the collapse photos? It's obvious that MUCH of the top structure's mass disintegrated into dust and was blown out sideways. That being the case, how was there enough mass left over to cause the structure below to collapse?

You really are a tool...er fool...er what the hell...both...

The steel did NOT disintegrate dickweed...

war  posted on  2009-03-23   8:38:28 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#837. To: war, sneakypete (#834)

Or wetting someone else's noodle...both par for the GOP pol course...

Yup, and then an hour later they're publicly demonizing gays.

meguro  posted on  2009-03-23   8:39:07 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  



      .
      .
      .

Comments (838 - 2261) not displayed.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]