4um: The thread that's changed its focus from the original title. Carry on ;)

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
Resistance
See other Resistance Articles
Title: The thread that's changed its focus from the original title. Carry on ;)
Source: [None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: Mar 21, 2009
Author: m e
Post Date: 2009-03-21 08:19:06 by Itistoolate
Keywords: None
Views: 11377
Comments: 2261

Officer Jack McLamb's shows:
arc.gcnlive.com/Archives2009/mar09/McLamb/030209.mp3
arc.gcnlive.com/Archives2009/mar09/McLamb/030309.mp3
arc.gcnlive.com/Archives2009/mar09/McLamb/030409.mp3
arc.gcnlive.com/Archives2009/mar09/McLamb/030509.mp3
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Comments (1-871) not displayed.
.
.
.

#872. To: war, Cynicom (#858)
My observation thus far has been not even close...in fact, anti-Jewier would be a more apt description.

Not anti-Jewier. Or pro-Jewier.
Just Jewier.
Generically more focused on Jews and Israel, whether for or against.
I wouldn't have bothered to explain but I've observed you are generally a good reader. I didn't bother before since Cynicom is an obvious quote mangler.
I would think it would be obvious since this is a thread about LP's outage and in about 900 posts, only 60-70 were actually about LP and the rest were Jewy/Birthy/Truthy. Although LP certainly had Jewy and Birthy and even some Truthy threads over time, it was not quite to the extext I observed here in a single day of reading articles. Of course, I haven't seen anything here like a Biker Bar so certain articles don't migrate to a back room as you often see in other forums. From a forum management perspective, this can be a plus or a minus in terms of segregation of topics, how casual posters or lurkers perceive the forum, whether you make some lib group's hate site list, or just in having a variety of topics that are representative of the forum's variety of opinion in a limited sidebar space.

TooConservative posted on 2009-03-23 11:28:27 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#873. To: F16Fighter (#870)
morning Liberator !

"If you love wealth more than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, depart from us in peace. We ask not your counsel nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you. May your chains rest lightly upon you and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen.”—Samuel Adams

Rotara posted on 2009-03-23 11:28:43 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#874. To: Rhino369 (#842)
Calling her caribou barbie wasn't nice. Her real name is Bible Spice.

Calling you "Piehole Spice" isn't nice either; I apologize, kid.

Liberator posted on 2009-03-23 11:28:57 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#875. To: F16Fighter (#870)
Hey Meg - isn't it true that you hated the fact that you weren't as pretty as Palin? AND hated that you lacked that one extra orifice?

Isn't it true that you were lobotomized years ago, and that would explain your current wackiness?

meguro posted on 2009-03-23 11:29:13 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#876. To: Rotara (#873)
Mo'-nin', Roto-kill!
(hope you like that nick ;-)

Liberator posted on 2009-03-23 11:29:54 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#877. To: meguro (#875)
Isn't it true that you were lobotomized years ago, and that would explain your current wackiness?

Yes.
I blame Free Republic and Jim Robinson :-)

Liberator posted on 2009-03-23 11:30:56 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#878. To: F16Fighter (#876)
Roto-kill

Coming from you I'll receive it as an honor. ;-)

"If you love wealth more than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, depart from us in peace. We ask not your counsel nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you. May your chains rest lightly upon you and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen.”—Samuel Adams

Rotara posted on 2009-03-23 11:31:39 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#879. To: nooz (#860)
(or Jewy, or can we not quibble about how it's spelled, so we can bypass the hot button of those who spell Jews, Jooz. I think you can grasp that basic point.)

Or those who might be somewhat sensitive because their screen name is homonymic for 'news' but is similarly spelled 'nooz'?

TooConservative posted on 2009-03-23 11:32:52 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#880. To: nooz (#867)
Before we continue can I ask what "Jewier" means? I assumed it to mean "more Jews and pro-Israel". IS that a poor assumption?

war posted on 2009-03-23 11:33:06 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#881. To: Rotara (#878)
Then "Roto-kill" it is! (knuckle-tap)

Liberator posted on 2009-03-23 11:34:30 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#882. To: war (#880)
Before we continue can I ask what "Jewier" means? I assumed it to mean "more Jews and pro-Israel". IS that a poor assumption?

I don't know what it means. I've been asking TooConservative to clarify it since he/she brought it up.

nooz posted on 2009-03-23 11:35:12 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#883. To: TooConservative (#879)
(or Jewy, or can we not quibble about how it's spelled, so we can bypass the hot button of those who spell Jews, Jooz. I think you can grasp that basic point.) Or those who might be somewhat sensitive because their screen name is homonymic for 'news' but is similarly spelled 'nooz'?

You're changing the subject again.
I'm not sensitive about the name at all.
What is your problem?

nooz posted on 2009-03-23 11:37:12 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#884. To: F16Fighter (#881)
tap

"If you love wealth more than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, depart from us in peace. We ask not your counsel nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you. May your chains rest lightly upon you and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen.”—Samuel Adams

Rotara posted on 2009-03-23 11:41:13 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#885. To: F16Fighter (#874)
Calling you "Piehole Spice" isn't nice either; I apologize, kid.

It also isn't funny. Try again please. You can do better Liberator.

Rhino369 posted on 2009-03-23 11:41:42 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#886. To: sneakypete (#823)
(Palo) after Tancredo dropped out Goldi went for that other guy, Hunter
(sneakypete) And Hunter was a guy that made Tancredo seem sincere and the Kennedy family against nepotism by comparison.
I got flamed all over the place for outing Hunter as a liar and a poser on his military record. Even had people calling me a phony vet who knew nothing about the army.

If we are all letting our hair down here
I respected and applauded you for doing that, Pete
I didn't come out publicly and support you, because I wasn't willing to take the heat you were taking
but I admired you for doing it
Love, Palo

palo verde posted on 2009-03-23 11:44:00 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#887. To: nooz (#883)
I'm not sensitive about the name at all.

Of course you're not.

What is your problem?

My problem? You and Cynicom are obsessed with a mildly humorous toss-off remark and continue to drag this thread off-topic but I have the problem?
LOL.

TooConservative posted on 2009-03-23 11:46:09 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#888. To: sneakypete (#821)
(Palo) I eventually returned to LP despite the banning of Ron Paul articles,
I like the forum
and posters disobeyed the banning anyway,
we always had Ron Paul threads going on
(sneakypete) I know. I even posted a couple myself.

thank you very much for that, Pete
I appreciate it
Love, Palo

palo verde posted on 2009-03-23 11:46:56 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#889. To: TooConservative (#872)
I like it here. Us normal folk can feel comfortable any where. So thus should Moonbats...

war posted on 2009-03-23 11:49:17 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#890. To: Rotara (#884)
Love your in-distress upside-down flag and Adams' poignant words. People better start understanding. SOON.

Liberator posted on 2009-03-23 11:49:22 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#891. To: Rhino369 (#885)
It also isn't funny. Try again please. You can do better Liberator.

Ok. How about, '@sshole-Spice"?
Hey, how much of a moron does one have to be to actually get banned at LP?

Liberator posted on 2009-03-23 11:52:12 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#892. To: F16Fighter (#890)
Love your in-distress upside-down flag and Adams' poignant words. People better start understanding. SOON.

It's too late for most things but it's not too late to decide to stand up to them and make THEM die for their evil cause vs just kicking back and enjoying the hell bound ride.
Thank you for noticing my friend. We're 'there' now.

"If you love wealth more than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, depart from us in peace. We ask not your counsel nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you. May your chains rest lightly upon you and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen.”—Samuel Adams

Rotara posted on 2009-03-23 11:53:02 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#893. To: TooConservative (#887)
Are you kosher ?

"If you love wealth more than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, depart from us in peace. We ask not your counsel nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you. May your chains rest lightly upon you and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen.”—Samuel Adams

Rotara posted on 2009-03-23 11:53:53 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#894. To: war (#889)
I like it here. Us normal folk can feel comfortable any where.

Seems pleasant enough, a bit of difference in the forum software. LP had sub-forums though those weren't like the ones at FR. LP had no 'private' mail, FR and 4um do (I consider that to be a minus for many reasons). LP had no homepages/bookmarks and 4um and FR do.

TooConservative posted on 2009-03-23 11:56:06 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#895. To: war (#889)
I like it here. Us normal folk can feel comfortable any where.

"Us normal folk"?? LOL, Who?? Where?? HUH??
(See war? It's just like olde times ;-)

Liberator posted on 2009-03-23 11:57:16 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#896. To: Rotara (#893)
Are you kosher ?

Ah, the inevitable question. At least you're direct.
Nope. Gentile.

TooConservative posted on 2009-03-23 11:57:44 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#897. To: TooConservative (#887)
My problem? You and Cynicom are obsessed with a mildly humorous toss-off remark and continue to drag this thread off-topic but I have the problem?

I asked a simple question and you have turned yourself 8 ways to Sunday to avoid answering it. That's a curiousity. Not an obsession. If you don't want to answer the question just say so.
You, a new poster, in a day and half decides to judge the nature of the forum from a couple of threads against your fascist racist home turf. Then you "doubt" that there is as much freedom as is advertised.
Well, how has it measured up now? Have you been able to engage with anyone without being snapped at for 'pestering' another?
You have some issues and we no longer have to guess at what they are.
Oh, and :)

nooz posted on 2009-03-23 12:00:08 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#898. To: nooz (#860)
can we not quibble about how it's spelled, so we can bypass the hot button of those who spell Jews, Jooz.....

Button not bypassed.
Shalom.
Eff the Bankers
bluegrass posted on 2009-03-23 12:00:57 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#899. To: sneakypete (#824)
We are in agreement on this one. I hate McLunatic so much I would have voted for Soetoro if it had looked like McLunatic was going to win.
BTW,I haven't seen anybody scare the RINO's and their twin brothers the Dims as much as Palin has scared them since Newt first became Speaker of the House. This was back before they got blackmail material on him. The Dims and RINO's get absolutely hysterical every time the name "Palin" is mentioned.
IMHO,she couldn't receive higher praise.

Not a thing I can disagree with you about at all on this.

litus posted on 2009-03-23 12:02:55 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#900. To: sneakypete (#825)
Yeah,Tancredo switched overnight,and there has to be a reason for it. I have no insider information,I'm just saying blackmail and extortion were the most likely reasons.

I hadn't thought of that; that seems possible.

litus posted on 2009-03-23 12:03:51 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#901. To: bluegrass (#898)
Button not bypassed.
Shalom.

I gave it a shot. LOL!

nooz posted on 2009-03-23 12:05:11 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#902. To: TooConservative (#887)
http://www.the-peoples-forum.com/cgi-bin/latestcomments.cgi
Tell robin Cyni sent you.

Cynicom posted on 2009-03-23 12:06:11 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#903. To: sneakypete (#819)
(Palo) I don't think we went overboard for Ron Paul on LP
the candidate with the most energy behind him wins
(sneakypte) Palo,it is true that the mainstream media treated him like he was a social disease,but the truth is he was never going to win to start with,and even if he had of won he would have gotten zero support from the professional pols in either branch of the ruling party. Helping him be successful would have ended their own political careers,and there is no way they would have done this.
Putting a 3rd Party candidate into the White House is a waste of time until there are enough members of congress from the same party as him to provide him with a little support.
I still voted for him,but he had about as much chance of winning the presidency as I did.

I fully believed Ron Paul would win the Presidency which is why I campaigned so hard for him
If I had not believed he had realistic chance of winning, I would not have poured all my energy into making him our President
At that time Sarah Palin had not even entered the picture, look at the other GOP candidates for President!
not a single one of them came even anywhere near Ron Paul!
Ron Paul was the single great candidate, the others were mediocre
Pete, I turned out to be wrong, Ron Paul dd not win the GOP nomination
But I did the right thing for me to give it the good fight when I thought he would win
if you thought he had no chance, then you did the right thing for you
We both wanted to act realistically
we just saw reality differently then
I was wrong, you were right
but I am still glad I believed whole-heartedly he would win, and acted accordingly
Love, Palo

palo verde posted on 2009-03-23 12:08:44 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#904. To: Rotara (#892)
It's too late for most things but it's not too late to decide to stand up to them and make THEM die for their evil cause vs just kicking back and enjoying the hell bound ride.

Yeah, it's disturbing to say the least.
It is too late to change most of our subversive leadership, events, and massive wholesale Stockholm Syndrome inflicted upon the pods immediately, but either we stop the hemorrhaging soon and bandage this radically and hastened dismemberment of our Republic, or as many are predicting, THE sh*t WILL hit the fan. And why shouldn't America demand the indictment, arrest, and proper disposal of SEVERAL traitors who've done their best to destroy OUR Republic?
Quite frankly, it's probably a good thing that The Kenyan and his minions are accelerating their Marxist/NWO agenda so quickly - many seem to be snapping out of their respective complacent ideological comas, but will it be a case of too little, too late?

Liberator posted on 2009-03-23 12:09:59 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#905. To: nooz (#897)
I asked a simple question and you have turned yourself 8 ways to Sunday to avoid answering it.

I thought my 872 was as plain as it could be.

You, a new poster, in a day and half decides to judge the nature of the forum from a couple of threads against your fascist racist home turf.

Mmmm...and of course no one else does this? You can't be that naive. As for LP or FR or other forums I've belonged to, I suppose fascist and racist are epithets you can hurl, much as the organized Left does when frustrated or when they lack arguments with any substance. The tactic is quite familiar.

Then you "doubt" that there is as much freedom as is advertised.

I still do. I think it's clear enough there are people who have been banned, probably for disruption.

You have some issues and we no longer have to guess at what they are.

But a poster who spells his handle 'nooz' couldn't possibly have some issues? LOL. Obviously, you're just a wee bit sensitive about anyone pointing it out.

TooConservative posted on 2009-03-23 12:11:47 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#906. To: nooz (#901)
No harm, no foul.

; )
Eff the Bankers
bluegrass posted on 2009-03-23 12:12:18 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#907. To: TooConservative, christine (#905)
I think it's clear enough there are people who have been banned, probably for disruption.

Ask the board's owner. She's a straight shooter.
Eff the Bankers
bluegrass posted on 2009-03-23 12:14:20 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#908. To: TooConservative, war (#894)
LP had no 'private' mail, FR and 4um do (I consider that to be a minus for many reasons). LP had no homepages/bookmarks and 4um and FR do.

These are nice features...
But at FR, the hyenas and jackals used Private Mail as a tool to gang-bang and cannibalize those who opposed The Cult-of-Bush, or those who had/have the "gall" to go against the grain of the consensus.
Personally, I prefer divergent views instead of an echo-chamber, but then again, the OCD-parrots can be annoying.

Liberator posted on 2009-03-23 12:15:22 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#909. To: bluegrass, TooConservative (#907)
probably for disruption

correct. there have been few, but in every case they were disrupters--people whose only purpose was to denigrate this forum and its members. i'm sure some were paid shills.

christine posted on 2009-03-23 12:20:46 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#910. To: bluegrass (#907)
Somewhere earlier on the thread, some of you exchanged remarks about a former poster, can't recall the name. I had the impression of a banning or a blocked IP address, i.e. not a voluntary departure.
Some of you appear to claim the radical free speech position. Given how the owner has couched her terms of service, clearly that is not the case.
Me, I go toward but stop short of the radical free speech position, just last week arguing that it wasn't illegal to shout fire in a crowded theater if there actually is a fire. Not surprisingly, the usual suspects tried to object to even that. It's not a bad argument and can be applied to other topics that are considered too 'hot' for free speech to handle. We do live in an era of political correctness, perhaps not yet at the Soviet level.

TooConservative posted on 2009-03-23 12:20:47 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#911. To: christine (#909)
And we now have more of the same.

Cynicom posted on 2009-03-23 12:22:25 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#912. To: christine (#909)
correct. there have been few, but in every case they were disrupters--people whose only purpose was to denigrate this forum and its members. i'm sure some were paid shills.

Doesn't surprise me at all. I just thought some posters here were claiming something you couldn't possibly deliver. Anyway, I've never seen such a forum of any size that had radical free speech.
Thanks for the clarification.

TooConservative posted on 2009-03-23 12:23:27 ET Reply Trace Private Reply

.
.
.
Comments (913 - 2261) not displayed.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest

Freedom4um