See other War, War, War Articles
Title: Time for Jury Nullification on ALL Gun Law Cases
Source:
[None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: May 12, 2009
Author: Coral Snake
Post Date: 2009-05-12 22:56:51 by Coral Snake
Keywords: JuryNullification, JosephGoebbels, GunControl, HomelandSecurity
Views: 397
Comments: 10
It seems tath the Lying and cover up Joseph Goebbels methodology of the gun control crowd in the Obama Administration and the DemocRAT/RepublicRAT Congress has finally come to an end. A bill has been introduced to finally effectively attempt to BAN forearms using "potential terrorism" as an excuse. The methodology of this bill has been leaked out of the Obama "homeland security" department in the forms of several memmos that have tagged virtually ANY opposition to Obama and his rubber stamp congress as "potential terrorists". The proposed new gun bill we are discussing here (H.R. 2159 by Rep. Peter King of New York) would appearantly do a good thing by denying access to the legitimate firearms markets to known or SUSPECTED terrorists. However the devil here is in that word SUSPECTED. If the Joseph Goebbels propaganda sheets from the "homeland security" department are being used as the basis for "suspected" terrorists than VIRTUALLY EVERYBODY whyo opposes Obama and his rubber stamp Congress vomes under this ban. Therefore this bill is effectively a GUN BAN coming disguised as an anti terror bill. The gist of all of this is once again the government as it is currently constituted can no longer be trusted as a preserver, protector and defender of the basic rights of our Constitution as they WERE PUT UNDER OATH TO DO when they were given their elective and appointed offices. Once again it is up to us to protect our OWN Rights and it is time to practice JURY NULLIFICATION against ALL restrictive gum laws, Federal, State and Local.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: Coral Snake (#0)
It's the Klinton regime all over again: they'll twist the English language and subvert the Constitution at every turn. The hard part is getting the right people on juries who don't tip their hand during jury selection.
_________________________________________________________________________ Best idea you've ever put forward, CS.
Thanks. He was a very bright guy.
It was the Jewish-dominated Weimar Republic that chose to ban firearms for German citizens.
Bright yes. Coherent, yes. And eccentric? Cosmotheism seems to make some giant leaps based on a few facts, myths, and hopes.
I agree in principle but, why don't you ask how many here are ever summoned for federal petit jury duty? I've said many times that no one can stack a jury like the feds. I assisted a man who was charged with multiple counts of felony tax evasion evasion some years back, and I saw that out of 22 prospective jurors only one was a working stiff with no direct relationship with FedGov, and he disqualified himself because he recognized the defendant from the local donut shop where they both stopped for breakfast! He didn't have to disqualify himself but like most of those who are summoned he did what he could to get out of jury duty. He may have even felt that if he "had to pay his taxes then so do you!" and didn't want to know if he has been duped for years. In fact, I've been met with hostility from folks who are comfy with the status quo, and they'd rather convict someone than to admit they were duped, even if it freed us all from the IRS' tyranny. The rest were insurance company employees, local and county govt employees, social security recipients and in general people who are either loyal to or who can be easily controlled and intimidated by feds. The feds never bring indie truckers, flea market operators, small business types who handle lots of cash, etc., in for jury duty. In fact I submit that the govt (actually the federal court clerks) can spot the state worshipers and potential snitches and informants just by scanning tax returns. This doesn't even account for those who have served and convicted "enemies of the state" in previous trials. One such chap I met was called repeatedly and he convicted again and again until the last time when the jury exonerated the defendant. Needless to say that juror was never called again.
In other words, they understand the stakes involved, and take specific measures to avoid failure. Jurors who ought to be dismissed on the basis of conflict of interest against liberty are specifically requested and retained regardless of the accused's urepresentation's objections.
Each side is given three strikes so, no matter how carefully the defense tries to weed out the state worshipers the end result is a jury dominated by people who believe the defendant is guilty or he/she wouldn't be there. Those KGB informant types positively vibrate with zeal in their unspoken desire to serve the state, and they know that their job is to convict. The idea of second guessing the state and actually deciding that the defendant is a victim of malicious prosecution is unthinkable to the snitches/state worshipers.
I'm thinking of the troops Congress sent out to suppress the Whiskey rebellion. They must have truly believed in what they were doing.
"This man is Jesus,” shouted one man, spilling his Guinness as Barack Obama began his inaugural address. “When will he come to Kenya to save us?”
-Schweizerische Schuetzenzeitung (Swiss Shooting Federation) April, 1941
#2. To: Coral Snake (#0)
#3. To: Jethro Tull (#2)
A common belief among defenders of the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution is that the National Socialist government of Germany under Adolf Hitler did not permit the private ownership of firearms. Totalitarian governments, they have been taught in their high school civics classes, do not trust their citizens and do not dare permit them to keep firearms. Thus, one often hears the statement, "You know, the first thing the Nazis did when they came to power was outlaw firearms," or, "The first thing Hitler did in Germany was round up all the guns."
One can understand why many American gun owners want to believe this. They see in the current effort of their own government to take away their right to keep and bear arms a limitation of an essential element of their freedom and a move toward tyranny, and they want to characterize the gun-grabbers in the most negative way they can. Adolf Hitler has been vilified continuously for the past 60 years or so by the mass media in America, and certainly no politician or officeholder wants to be compared with him. If the gun-confiscation effort can be portrayed convincingly as something of which Hitler would have approved, it will have been effectively tarred.
#4. To: Deasy (#3)
William L. Pierce
#5. To: Jethro Tull (#4)
#6. To: Jethro Tull, christine (#4)
Thanks. He was a very bright guy.
#7. To: Coral Snake (#0)
#8. To: HOUNDDAWG (#7)
The feds never bring indie truckers, flea market operators, small business types who handle lots of cash, etc., in for jury duty.
#9. To: Deasy (#8)
In other words, they understand the stakes involved, and take specific measures to avoid failure. Jurors who ought to be dismissed on the basis of conflict of interest against liberty are specifically requested and retained regardless of the accused's representation's objections.
#10. To: HOUNDDAWG (#9)
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest