[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

The death of Yu Menglong: Political scandal in China (Homo Rape & murder of Actor)

The Pacific Plate Is CRACKING: A Massive Geological Disaster Is Unfolding!

Waste Of The Day: Veterans' Hospital Equipment Is Missing

The Earth Has Been Shaken By 466,742 Earthquakes So Far In 2025

LadyX

Half of the US secret service and every gov't three letter agency wants Trump dead. Tomorrow should be a good show

1963 Chrysler Turbine

3I/ATLAS is Beginning to Reveal What it Truly Is

Deep Intel on the Damning New F-35 Report

CONFIRMED “A 757 did NOT hit the Pentagon on 9/11” says Military witnesses on the scene

NEW: Armed man detained at site of Kirk memorial: Report

$200 Silver Is "VERY ATTAINABLE In Coming Rush" Here's Why - Mike Maloney

Trump’s Project 2025 and Big Tech could put 30% of jobs at risk by 2030

Brigitte Macron is going all the way to a U.S. court to prove she’s actually a woman

China's 'Rocket Artillery 360 Mile Range 990 Pound Warhead

FED's $3.5 Billion Gold Margin Call

France Riots: Battle On Streets Of Paris Intensifies After Macron’s New Move Sparks Renewed Violence

Saudi Arabia Pakistan Defence pact agreement explained | Geopolitical Analysis

Fooling Us Badly With Psyops

The Nobel Prize That Proved Einstein Wrong

Put Castor Oil Here Before Bed – The Results After 7 Days Are Shocking

Sounds Like They're Trying to Get Ghislaine Maxwell out of Prison

Mississippi declared a public health emergency over its infant mortality rate (guess why)

Andy Ngo: ANTIFA is a terrorist organization & Trump will need a lot of help to stop them

America Is Reaching A Boiling Point

The Pandemic Of Fake Psychiatric Diagnoses

This Is How People Actually Use ChatGPT, According To New Research

Texas Man Arrested for Threatening NYC's Mamdani

Man puts down ABC's The View on air

Strong 7.8 quake hits Russia's Kamchatka


War, War, War
See other War, War, War Articles

Title: Time for Jury Nullification on ALL Gun Law Cases
Source: [None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: May 12, 2009
Author: Coral Snake
Post Date: 2009-05-12 22:56:51 by Coral Snake
Keywords: JuryNullification, JosephGoebbels, GunControl, HomelandSecurity
Views: 389
Comments: 10

It seems tath the Lying and cover up Joseph Goebbels methodology of the gun control crowd in the Obama Administration and the DemocRAT/RepublicRAT Congress has finally come to an end. A bill has been introduced to finally effectively attempt to BAN forearms using "potential terrorism" as an excuse.

The methodology of this bill has been leaked out of the Obama "homeland security" department in the forms of several memmos that have tagged virtually ANY opposition to Obama and his rubber stamp congress as "potential terrorists".

The proposed new gun bill we are discussing here (H.R. 2159 by Rep. Peter King of New York) would appearantly do a good thing by denying access to the legitimate firearms markets to known or SUSPECTED terrorists. However the devil here is in that word SUSPECTED. If the Joseph Goebbels propaganda sheets from the "homeland security" department are being used as the basis for "suspected" terrorists than VIRTUALLY EVERYBODY whyo opposes Obama and his rubber stamp Congress vomes under this ban. Therefore this bill is effectively a GUN BAN coming disguised as an anti terror bill.

The gist of all of this is once again the government as it is currently constituted can no longer be trusted as a preserver, protector and defender of the basic rights of our Constitution as they WERE PUT UNDER OATH TO DO when they were given their elective and appointed offices. Once again it is up to us to protect our OWN Rights and it is time to practice JURY NULLIFICATION against ALL restrictive gum laws, Federal, State and Local.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 8.

#7. To: Coral Snake (#0)

I agree in principle but, why don't you ask how many here are ever summoned for federal petit jury duty?

I've said many times that no one can stack a jury like the feds.

I assisted a man who was charged with multiple counts of felony tax evasion evasion some years back, and I saw that out of 22 prospective jurors only one was a working stiff with no direct relationship with FedGov, and he disqualified himself because he recognized the defendant from the local donut shop where they both stopped for breakfast! He didn't have to disqualify himself but like most of those who are summoned he did what he could to get out of jury duty.

He may have even felt that if he "had to pay his taxes then so do you!" and didn't want to know if he has been duped for years. In fact, I've been met with hostility from folks who are comfy with the status quo, and they'd rather convict someone than to admit they were duped, even if it freed us all from the IRS' tyranny.

The rest were insurance company employees, local and county govt employees, social security recipients and in general people who are either loyal to or who can be easily controlled and intimidated by feds.

The feds never bring indie truckers, flea market operators, small business types who handle lots of cash, etc., in for jury duty.

In fact I submit that the govt (actually the federal court clerks) can spot the state worshipers and potential snitches and informants just by scanning tax returns. This doesn't even account for those who have served and convicted "enemies of the state" in previous trials.

One such chap I met was called repeatedly and he convicted again and again until the last time when the jury exonerated the defendant.

Needless to say that juror was never called again.

HOUNDDAWG  posted on  2009-05-17   0:30:25 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: HOUNDDAWG (#7)

The feds never bring indie truckers, flea market operators, small business types who handle lots of cash, etc., in for jury duty.

In other words, they understand the stakes involved, and take specific measures to avoid failure. Jurors who ought to be dismissed on the basis of conflict of interest against liberty are specifically requested and retained regardless of the accused's urepresentation's objections.

Deasy  posted on  2009-05-17   8:30:23 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 8.

#9. To: Deasy (#8)

In other words, they understand the stakes involved, and take specific measures to avoid failure. Jurors who ought to be dismissed on the basis of conflict of interest against liberty are specifically requested and retained regardless of the accused's representation's objections.

Each side is given three strikes so, no matter how carefully the defense tries to weed out the state worshipers the end result is a jury dominated by people who believe the defendant is guilty or he/she wouldn't be there.

Those KGB informant types positively vibrate with zeal in their unspoken desire to serve the state, and they know that their job is to convict.

The idea of second guessing the state and actually deciding that the defendant is a victim of malicious prosecution is unthinkable to the snitches/state worshipers.

HOUNDDAWG  posted on  2009-05-18 00:02:07 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 8.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]