[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Sign-in] [Mail] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
|
Editorial See other Editorial Articles Title: White race traitor freaks out over being called “racist” White race traitor freaks out over being called “racist” Max Du Preez is well-known for being the traitorous “Uncle Tom” of the Afrikaner nation. An unprincipled bottom-feeding piece of self-hating excrement who made name for himself as a vociferous pro-Communist buffoon, Du Preez’s undisguised slanderous anti-White hate speech is regularly trotted out by third rate fish wrap papers such as The Star, Sowetan etc. Whenever the Marxist-infested simian regime needs to viciously lash out at the Whites they so envy, but fear being called “racist” lest the stock markets shed more points, Max is the hatchet man who will eagerly do their dirty work, as if anything penned by this mendacious scumbag is taken seriously by thinking Whites. Having realised that he’s way beyond his sell-by date, and feeling a bit hard done by how easily SAP general Lothar Neethling ripped him a new asshole back in the eighties (not to mention the disrespectful sniggers from his beloved coon cronies in a weird “honour amongst thieves & rogues” type phenomenon where even the blacks who Du Preez so desperately tries to ingratiate himself with treat him with the universal contempt so deserving of a traitor) our Max decided it was time to try his hand at some “serious journalism” which for once didn’t involve White bashing. Since he’s firmly established his “struggle credentials” and considered himself an “honorary & equally oppressed & suffering black” old Max foolishly took on the topic of Jacob Zuma, and dared to belch forth some mild criticism of the neo-Dingaan & his cronies. Well, the predictable response (to anyone except Max, it seems) was swift and concise. As with any uppity white wannabe kaffir, he was mercilessly smacked down and put in his place. For crying out loud, doesn’t this gormless plastic blow-up & disposable fuckslut of bulging black dicks realise by now his ONLY permissible function is to be the Useful White Idiot / Boere Uncle Tom, dismissively kept in storage and only rolled out on a decrepit, squeaky wheel chair every so now & then as a journalistic hit man when kaffir journos don’t dare say certain things which they feel need to be aired? Clearly not - the idiot arrogantly assumed he’d reached level 5 of political self-actualisation and would be safe in his “impeccable struggle credentials”. He recently kotched up some lame & mild critique of the new Zuma regime, and squealed like a pig caught with his balls in a bear trap when his oh so beloved jungle bunnies told him to fuck right off. I wonder what burns him the most - being treated with the same dismissive, disdainful impatience Whites treat him with, or the realisation that amongst the lowest of the evolutionary low he is humoured & barely tolerated with his only allowed function being that of the treacherous anti-White hatemonger he’s positioned himself as? Not that it matters - his hysterical screeching as witnessed below betrays a horrified dismay at the fact that nobody - not even the coons he so lovingly patronises - has the time of day for him. Time to retire, Maxieboy. Or better, to go park your car somewhere out of sight, shove a hosepipe into the exhaust & the other end into the slightly opened back window and step on the gas boet. Admittedly not a graceful, elegant end but in your case quite fitting- how else can a double-crossing apostate with a disgraceful, perfidious and dishonourable career be terminated other than in obscure, shameful ignominy? His insufferable oh-woe-is-me diatribe is reproduced below, if you have the stomach for it. No people in history have ever survived who thought they could protect their freedom by making themselves inoffensive to their enemies. Dean Acheson Appeasers believe that if you keep on throwing steaks to a tiger, the tiger will become a vegetarian. Heywood Broun The one sure way to conciliate a tiger is to allow oneself to be devoured. Konrad Adenauer Max Du Preez: “Confused about democracy" I am beginning to think I should revise my statement made often in recent months and years, namely that democracy was now indelibly inscribed on the hearts and minds of most South Africans. If the views of so many of the readers of these columns on News24.com are anything to go by, a substantial number of South Africans, perhaps even the majority, believe the concept “democracy” means you hold elections and then the party that gets most votes runs the country like they want to. Criticism of such a party and the government it has formed, so these people believe, is tantamount to disloyalty to the country and, if coming from anyone else than a black person, racism. My column in this space about what I would have said to president-to-be Jacob Zuma if he were to call me before his inauguration had more reaction than any other piece I had ever written in any medium over all the years that I’ve been doing this. (Many even believed I seriously thought Zuma was about to phone me for advice…) It wasn’t because it was a profound piece or even that it was controversial. The reason for the uproar was simply because I dared ask questions of Zuma shortly after 65% of the voters voted for his party. And, sadly, because my skin is pale. Reaction Let me give you a sample of some of the reaction I got. (I’m not making this up - I’m cutting and pasting from the messages sent.) “You’ve got to accept that Blacks now rule this country. Stop being jealous. Zuma might not be a saint but at least he’s giving us the freedom that you guys deprived us from during apartheid.” “The man has suffered enough for the past eight years. Zuma did not kill anyone, he was just involved in a corrupt relationship with Shabir. During apartheid, lots of our black brothers were murdered by white cops and we manage to forgive them. So let’s just forgive Zuma.” “The ANC is ruling and it will be this way for sometime to come. Why don’t you and others like yourself accept that Zuma was chosen by the majority who obviously do not appreciate your political views. You and the National Party have over half a century wasted money on apartheid yet it’s only now when black people are in power that you start talking about monies being wasted. South Africa is not going back to colonial rule, never…ever.” “Most black people don’t like it when whites criticise the black government as we know that most of them never even raised a voice against apartheid.” “This is the time that articles of this nature come to an end. Mr Zuma is the president and he must be addressed as such. You must stop these nonsensical insinuations. If you are not happy perhaps migrate to Madagascar.” “I guess you’re one of them pale people who would serve the country better if they left to Australia or something.” “We all know Zuma was tried and convicted by the media and hence your sickening comments and those of your regular readers. Guys, just admit it, we will rule you into eternity.” Now if these people were reacting to a racist diatribe, one would still understand. But I merely asked Zuma to explain the evidence accepted by a court of law implicating him in corrupt behaviour so we can be sure we don’t have a crook as president. I said I would ask Zuma to apply black economic empowerment and affirmative action more logically and productively and to restore the independence of state institutions compromised by Thabo Mbeki. In a lighter vain I asked him to try on Helen Zille’s “war song”, Koekie Loekie, and to teach Marthinus van Schalkwyk to dance. And for that I’m a racist who should “go back to Holland where you came from”? I’m suddenly an apartheid war criminal? Dangerous notions Feebly, I suggested to some of these people that they should at least Google me or read some of my books before they pronounce on my past. I can’t blame my old enemies in the old National Party, the security police and the clandestine military and police units I helped expose in the 1980s if they had a good laugh at my expense. The biggest mistake in the thinking reflected above is that a party or an individual should be beyond criticism simply because they were the democratic choice of more than half the voters. (George W Bush was also the choice of most American voters…) Equally dangerous is the notion repeated by so many that our democracy boils down to the rule of blacks over whites. People should remember the words by Nelson Mandela at his inauguration 15 years ago: Never, never and never again will one group be allowed to dominate another in South Africa. Democracy in the fullest sense of the word means full freedom of speech and association; the accountability and transparency of government; equality before the law; the separation of powers between the legislative, executive and judicial arms of government; tolerance and protection of minority views and interests; and the nurture of civil society institutions like the media and NGOs. Let’s hope our people have a better understanding of democracy by the time we go to the polls again in 2014, because the opposition parties are bound to grow more and pose an even more serious challenge to the ANC. I can only imagine the hysteria among the kind of people whom I quoted above if the ANC were ever voted out of power by a party also supported by the minority groups, like Cope or the DA. Who coined the phrase “Zanu-fication” of the ANC?
Poster Comment: Feebly, I suggested to some of these people that they should at least Google me Now that's funny!
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: Prefrontal Vortex (#0)
(Edited)
The father of Heywood Hale Broun.
Clearly not - the idiot arrogantly assumed he’d reached level 5 of political self-actualisation and would be safe in his “impeccable struggle credentials”. He recently kotched up some lame & mild critique of the new Zuma regime, and squealed like a pig caught with his balls in a bear trap when his oh so beloved jungle bunnies told him to fuck right off. I wonder what burns him the most - being treated with the same dismissive, disdainful impatience Whites treat him with, or the realisation that amongst the lowest of the evolutionary low he is humoured & barely tolerated with his only allowed function being that of the treacherous anti-White hatemonger he’s positioned himself as? Not that it matters - his hysterical screeching as witnessed below betrays a horrified dismay at the fact that nobody - not even the coons he so lovingly patronises - has the time of day for him. you sure can't accuse Guru of being PC! too funny.
The smooth criminal transition from Bush/Cheney to Obama
|
||
|
[Home]
[Headlines]
[Latest Articles]
[Latest Comments]
[Post]
[Sign-in]
[Mail]
[Setup]
[Help]
[Register]
|
||