[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Trump expected to shake up White House briefing room Ukrainians have stolen up to half of US aid ex-Polish deputy minister Gaza doctor raped, tortured to death in Israeli custody, new report reveals German Lutheran Church Bans AfD Members From Committees, Calls Party 'Anti-Human' Berlin Teachers Sound Alarm Over Educational Crisis Caused By Multiculturalism Trump Hosts Secret Global Peace Summit at Mar-a-Lago! Heat Is Radiating From A Huge Mass Under The Moon Elon Musk Delivers a Telling Response When Donald Trump Jr. Suggests FBI recovers funds for victims of scammed banker Mark Felton: Can Russia Attack Britain? Notre Dame Apologizes After Telling Hockey Fans Not To Wear Green, Shamrocks, 'Fighting Irish' Dear Horse, which one of your posts has the Deep State so spun up that's causing 4um to run slow? Bomb Cyclone Pacific Northwest Death Certificates Reveal FBI 'Revised' Murder Stats Still Bogus A $110B bubble on $500M earnings. History warns: Bubbles always burst. Joy Behar says people like their show because they tell the truth, unlike "dragon believer" Joe Rogan. Male Passenger Disappointed After Another Flight Ends Without A Stewardess Frantically Asking If Anyone Can Land The Plane Could the Rapid Growth of AI Boost Gold Demand? LOOK AT MY ASS! Elon Musk Responds As British Government "Summons" Him To 'Disinformation' Hearing MSNBC Contributor Panics Over Trump Nominating Bondi For AG: Dangerous Because Shes Competent House passes dangerous bill that targets nonprofits, pro-Palestine groups Navy Will Sideline 17 Support Vessels to Ease Strain on Civilian Mariners Israel carries out field executions, massacres in north Gaza AOC votes to back Israel Lobby's bogus anti-Semitism definition Biden to launch ICE mobile app, further disrupting Trump's mass deportation plan: Report Panic at Mar-a-Lago: How the Fake Press Pool Fueled Global Fear Until X Set the Record Straight Donald Trumps Nominee for the FCC Will Remove DEI as a Priority of the Agency Stealing JFK's Body Trump plans to revive Keystone XL pipeline to solidify U.S. energy independence

War, War, War
See other War, War, War Articles

Title: How to deal with Cindy Sheehan - FReeper-style
Source: RimJobs cesspool
URL Source: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1461234/posts
Published: Aug 11, 2005
Author: svcw - a typical FReeper
Post Date: 2005-08-11 11:00:33 by Jethro Tull
Keywords: FReeper-style, Sheehan, Cindy
Views: 1971
Comments: 236

To: roylene

It would make me feel better if you would punch her. This woman is a lunatic.

31 posted on 08/11/2005 7:45:30 AM PDT by svcw [ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Poster Comment:

A member of the cult voices his sympathy to a grieving mother.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 80.

#4. To: Jethro Tull (#0)

Hey Jethro, do you think Sarah Brady should be allowed to confiscate all our firearms simply because some whacknut shot her hubby in the head?

Willie Green  posted on  2005-08-11   11:18:10 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Cute Willie....defend this nutbar FReeper with an absurd argument. This has nothing to do with Sarah Brady, and everything to do with the invasion and *attemped* occupation/nation building, of a foreign land.

Shall we nuke Mecca now, or later?

Jethro Tull  posted on  2005-08-11   11:25:43 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Cute Willie....defend this nutbar FReeper with an absurd argument. This has nothing to do with Sarah Brady,

It's a legitimate analogy, Jethro.

Just like Sarah Brady, Cindy Sheehan is exploiting the tragic personal sacrifice of a family member to make an emotional statement on the national political stage.

So why do you sympathize with one and not the other?
Or do you actually sympathize with both and support both of their personal, political agendas?

Willie Green  posted on  2005-08-11   11:43:34 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

It's a legitimate analogy, Jethro.

Just like Sarah Brady, Cindy Sheehan is exploiting the tragic personal sacrifice of a family member to make an emotional statement on the national political stage.

Not quite the same Willie, sorry.

While Brady attempts to alter our constitution via the removal of our Second amendment, Sheehan looks to support the document by exposing an unjust, illegal, and unconstitutional foreign policy/war.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2005-08-11   11:51:12 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

While Brady attempts to alter our constitution via the removal of our Second amendment, Sheehan looks to support the document by exposing an unjust, illegal, and unconstitutional foreign policy/war.

Well said.

robin  posted on  2005-08-11   11:54:49 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Thanks. As someone said above, the Brady analogy is a strawman.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2005-08-11   11:56:29 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

As someone said above, the Brady analogy is a strawman.

No Jethro, as I stated before, it is a valid analogy.
And it may be a surprise to many here that I applaud the Constitutional distinction that you made. Kudos!
However, I doubt that Sheehan is actually motivated by concern for adherence to Constitutional processes.
She's simply pissed because she lost her son.
Issues of government policy or constitutionality don't mean squat to her.
All she wants to do is vent.

Willie Green  posted on  2005-08-11   13:45:18 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

However, I doubt that Sheehan is actually motivated by concern for adherence to Constitutional processes

She has countless reasons to demonstrate, beyond the illegality of the war Willie. I also mentioned the nation building scheme Bush is engaged in. You and I were both posting on the FR during Somalia and Bosnia....it was then a united forum against Herr Klinton. What is galling now is the current hypocrisy of the R’s over at that cesspool. You have to admit this country is in awful shape, and a large reason why is the blind allegiance some hold to the two party system. The pom-pom waving FReepers are no different that the socialist D‘s who wore kneepads for Bill.

Iraq is Bosnia is Somalia.

The only difference being the political party of the current (very unpopular) CIC.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2005-08-11   14:02:03 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

the blind allegiance some hold to the two party system

This Willie Green lunatic still buys into the "two party" paradigm?

He truly is a moron.

Unlike a lot of sheep he is here on the web exposed to the truth of what is really going on and he still holds tenuously to "my party good, your party bad" BS.

I would not waste any more time on this dunce, except for just pure entertainment or shits and giggles.

timetobuildaboat  posted on  2005-08-11   14:53:33 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

This Willie Green lunatic still buys into the "two party" paradigm?

Yes he does, but I have hope for him.

Anyone who gets the trade issue as right as Willie, isn't completely lost.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2005-08-11   18:13:24 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Hey, I haven't voted for a Republicrat candidate for POTUS since '88 when I was backstabbed by Papa Bush.
Since then, I've voted for Perot (twice), Buchanan and Peroutka.
So don't go slandering me with that "two party paradigm" bullcrap just because I refuse to align myself with the left-wing anti-war marxist dingbats.

Willie Green  posted on  2005-08-11   18:40:12 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

just because I refuse to align myself with the left-wing anti-war marxist dingbats.

Glad to hear you dumped the R's.....now.....it's time to dump the left and right nonsense.

It’s all about right and wrong.

You won't find a Marxist here Willie, no Little red books, or pictures of Che Guevara. We're a small remnant of nationalists (yes, that's a good word), protectionists and isolationists, but I speak for myself. Internationalism be damned.

Now, on to your non comment on Bush's desire to build a 'new' Middle East.' If that isn’t nation building, what is? And if the search for non existent WMD’s morphing into the creation of a democracy isn’t mission creep, the phrase doesn’t exist. Iraq isn't our damn business, and any kid who is stupid enough to fight in this military, for this government, gets what h/she deserves. I’m personally not grieving over Cindy Sheehan’s loss, rather I’m cheering her fight. Cold words for sure, but her boy was a corporate Hessian in my eyes. We’re witnessing the biggest movement toward empire since the Brits - and history (and free trade) has reduced them to nothing more than America's poodle.

Stick around Willie if you have an open mind. We all learn every day. It's those who remain frozen in cold war dogma who are truly lost.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2005-08-11   18:59:57 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Iraq isn't our damn business,

That's water over the dam, Jethro.
If we were debating whether Papa Bush should help boot Saddam out of Kuwait, I'd probably agree with you.
Let the stinking OPECKers deal with it themselves.
But that's NOT what happened, so the issue becomes what do we do since we ARE involved?
As far as I'm concerned, if Papa Bush got us involved, he shoulda finished Saddam back in Gulf I.
And Klinton should have obliterated Sadddam for violating the no-fly zone.
And Dubya shoulda dropped a grenade down Saddam's "spider hole" instead of capturing the SOB and pi$$ing away more taxpayer dollars on a "trial".
And I don't give a rat's patoot whether or not there were any WMDs.

But none of that happened either.
So we're stuck with "nation building".
I don't like it, but at this point, it is the "right" thing to do.
(as opposed to letting the country collapse into anarchy and civil war.)

Willie Green  posted on  2005-08-11   22:59:06 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

I don't like it, but at this point, it is the "right" thing to do. (as opposed to letting the country collapse into anarchy and civil war.)

Also, what makes you think thats not exactly what's happened? And WHY is any of this our business? We are the invaders period. They dont want us there, they never did. It's all a fraud we've done enough damage there now its in a total friggen mess and IMO a civil war is exactly what was planned from the beginning. The big solution is going to be dividing Iraq into three sections. SO much for taking democracy to Iraq. And thats another fraud I thought democracy was the will of the people.. if that is what Bush and his cohorts want to spread then give them democracy its their will that the US leaves.

Zipporah  posted on  2005-08-11   23:06:53 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Also, what makes you think thats not exactly what's happened?

The casualty figures are way too low.
If there was truly a general uprising of the local populace, casualties would be at least 100x greater and there would be a massive migration of refugees.

Willie Green  posted on  2005-08-11   23:21:57 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

The casualty figures are way too low. If there was truly a general uprising of the local populace, casualties would be at least 100x greater and there would be a massive migration of refugees.

The casualty figures of our soldiers?? Are you basing this on the official figures?

Zipporah  posted on  2005-08-11   23:34:31 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Are you basing this on the official figures?

Just my impression of what's reported in the lamestream media.
Given their anti-Bush bias, I trust that they'd trumpet much higher figures if that's what was happening.

Willie Green  posted on  2005-08-11   23:41:51 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

ust my impression of what's reported in the lamestream media. Given their anti-Bush bias, I trust that they'd trumpet much higher figures if that's what was happening.

Dear God are you serious?? Anti-Bush bias? They're so far up Bush's rear that they could be suppositories.

Zipporah  posted on  2005-08-11   23:49:49 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

They're so far up Bush's rear that they could be suppositories.

If that were true, then none of us would have ever heard of Cindy Sheehan.

Willie Green  posted on  2005-08-12   0:03:37 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

They're so far up Bush's rear that they could be suppositories.

If that were true, then none of us would have ever heard of Cindy Sheehan

Hi Willie, I noticed your remark, and I hope you don't mind if I comment on it.

I hear, frequently, about the "liberal" media who are against Bush, and are a bunch of cunning anti American devils.

I do not watch TV, so I am at a disadvantage in that regard.

The Mass Media I see, (Colorado Springs Gazzette), makes the BOOB TUBE Simpson's special look like a lecture on differential equations.

To be clear, the media here shows glowing pictures of Laura Bush on the front page with exciting tripe as the caption, AP stories (and I do mean stories) about how "our president" is leading the world to a greater peace, and such .

And little to nothing about any discontent with the policies of the current admin.

The MSM I see seems to me to have little to nothing to do with the picture you paint, and from what I see, the vast powers of the media are supporting the Bush admin totally and with out question.

I have a difficult time believing we are, in fact, seeing, the same media, that is so "liberal".

Please respond and explain this anomaly. TIA.

tom007  posted on  2005-08-12   0:22:56 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

        There are no replies to Comment # 80.

End Trace Mode for Comment # 80.

Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]