See other War, War, War Articles
Title: How to deal with Cindy Sheehan - FReeper-style
Source:
RimJobs cesspool
URL Source: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1461234/posts
Published: Aug 11, 2005
Author: svcw - a typical FReeper
Post Date: 2005-08-11 11:00:33 by Jethro Tull
Keywords: FReeper-style, Sheehan, Cindy
Views: 2339
Comments: 236
To: roylene It would make me feel better if you would punch her. This woman is a lunatic. 31 posted on 08/11/2005 7:45:30 AM PDT by svcw [ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]
Poster Comment: A member of the cult voices his sympathy to a grieving mother.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Comments (1-31) not displayed.
.
.
.
#32. To: Willie Green (#30)
Don't you think it's harder to lose a son in a war you don't believe in, especially after it's become evident that the war was based on lies?
:) :) :) :)
Are we but an organic computer influenced by our environment to desire one set of neuropeptides over another, equating into competition for self worth on a primitive level never seen by the shallow and self empowering.
"And the other thing I want him to tell me is 'just what was the noble cause Casey died for?' Was it freedom and democracy? Bullshit! He died for oil. He died to make your friends richer. He died to expand American imperialism in the Middle East. We're not freer here, thanks to your PATRIOT Act. Iraq is not free. You get America out of Iraq and Israel out of Palestine and you'll stop the terrorism," she exclaimed. "There, I used the 'I' word -- imperialism," the 48 year-old mother quipped. "And now I'm going to use another 'I' word -- impeachment -- because we cannot have these people pardoned. They need to be tried on war crimes and go to jail." As the veterans in Dallas rose to their feet, Sheehan said defiantly, "My son was killed in 2004. I am not paying my taxes for 2004. You killed my son, George Bush, and I don't owe you a penny...you give my son back and I'll pay my taxes. Come after me (for back taxes) and we'll put this war on trial." (Willie Green)However, I doubt that Sheehan is actually motivated by concern for adherence to Constitutional processes. Read more of what Cindy has to say at http://www.meetwithcindy.org. "WE ARE INSULTED when people like Bush say that America has to 'stay the course' in Iraq to 'honor our children's sacrifices.' Not one more drop of blood should be shed for the lies and deceptions." - Cindy Sheehan, mother of Casey Sheehan, KIA 04/04/04
This Willie Green lunatic still buys into the "two party" paradigm? He truly is a moron. Unlike a lot of sheep he is here on the web exposed to the truth of what is really going on and he still holds tenuously to "my party good, your party bad" BS. I would not waste any more time on this dunce, except for just pure entertainment or shits and giggles.
Are we but an organic computer influenced by our environment to desire one set of neuropeptides over another, equating into competition for self worth on a primitive level never seen by the shallow and self empowering.
You obviously have no frigging idea WTF you're talking about, so go build your boat.
Yes he does, but I have hope for him. Anyone who gets the trade issue as right as Willie, isn't completely lost.
Hey, I haven't voted for a Republicrat candidate for POTUS since '88 when I was backstabbed by Papa Bush.
Hate to give you a ticket on the clue bus but Marxist dingbats are the ones that are promoting the war.
Glad to hear you dumped the R's.....now.....it's time to dump the left and right nonsense. It’s all about right and wrong. You won't find a Marxist here Willie, no Little red books, or pictures of Che Guevara. We're a small remnant of nationalists (yes, that's a good word), protectionists and isolationists, but I speak for myself. Internationalism be damned. Now, on to your non comment on Bush's desire to build a 'new' Middle East.' If that isn’t nation building, what is? And if the search for non existent WMD’s morphing into the creation of a democracy isn’t mission creep, the phrase doesn’t exist. Iraq isn't our damn business, and any kid who is stupid enough to fight in this military, for this government, gets what h/she deserves. I’m personally not grieving over Cindy Sheehan’s loss, rather I’m cheering her fight. Cold words for sure, but her boy was a corporate Hessian in my eyes. We’re witnessing the biggest movement toward empire since the Brits - and history (and free trade) has reduced them to nothing more than America's poodle. Stick around Willie if you have an open mind. We all learn every day. It's those who remain frozen in cold war dogma who are truly lost.
You mean you don't know Freepers and other war supporters are cowards? That they only support war when others fight? It makes them feel like men, like they've got some balls, however tiny.
This is from the same kind of people who celebrated and made fun of Rachel Corrie being killed by an Israeli goon. They are a cancer within our society.
God is always good!
and he's scored again! you are on your game today, baby! ;)
No, she is mad as hell her son died for a damn lie, got it?
God is always good!
I agree. Sheehan's son has been dead a very short time and anyone who accuses her of exploiting his death is pretty fricken sick IMO.
Holy cow, someone actually said some bullshit like that? Like it's Sheehan's fault that the Center for Army Lessons Learned and the Urban Warfare Journal have been screaming for at least six years (and it probably goes back at least a decade) that urban warfare training needed to be a priority for the army, and their pleas were unanswered? Like it's her fault that "Help is on the way" for the military, and nothing changed from the Clinton era? I haven't followed the Cindy Sheehan threads, but had to respond when I read the quoted line. I haven't had that much beer tonight but my mind still can't work its way around the reasoning that parenting caused a soldier's death.
"Rivers of blood were spilled out over land that, in normal times, not ever the poorest Arab would have worried his head over"--Field Marshal Erwin Rommel
I wish :)
outrageous, isn't it?
That's water over the dam, Jethro. But none of that happened either.
Why? We had NO business getting involved in that either esp when Saddam was given the go ahead to attack Kuwait and he was told we had no interest in that conflict. So then we attack? What horseshit.
you got it way before i did then.
The right thing to do? You think we are building a nation in Iraq? You are living in fantasy land!
God is always good!
First, get the fools who forced us into this mess out of office. They have aptly demonstrated that they cannot competently handle the situation. Look at the quotes from Bush's dad on why he did not knock off Saddam after the first Gulf War. Both Bush Sr. and Powell predicted the quagmire that we now face.
Also, what makes you think thats not exactly what's happened? And WHY is any of this our business? We are the invaders period. They dont want us there, they never did. It's all a fraud we've done enough damage there now its in a total friggen mess and IMO a civil war is exactly what was planned from the beginning. The big solution is going to be dividing Iraq into three sections. SO much for taking democracy to Iraq. And thats another fraud I thought democracy was the will of the people.. if that is what Bush and his cohorts want to spread then give them democracy its their will that the US leaves.
Lt Odom blows your hypothesis out of the water here. You never, never, never chase good money after bad. The prudent thing to do is to cut your losses. But the elites don't care about the human losses. It's all about their power and their profit as is the case with EVERY war.
Before Saddam attacked Kuwait, he called in our Ambassador April Glaspie and asked her what the Americans thought of the plan. Iraq did have a claim to the region, but Saddam wanted to bounce it off the Americans before going in. When Saddam asked: "Can we go into Kuwait?" Glaspie responded "The US doesn't interfere in Arab affairs.".
It's Ret. General Odom.
The casualty figures are way too low.
This isn't what happened in Viet Nam. There a large percentage of the general population supported the insurgents but didn't actually fight. Hence, they weren't killed unless the Americans had been drinking that day or a Sgt. Cally type situation was in progress. Why would it be any different in Iraq? ...there would be a massive migration of refugees We didn't see this in Viet Nam. We didn't see this in france during WW II. Must the world morph into something new in order to protect Bush from his silly mistakes?
One little ole woman certainly has them all stirred up..........wonder why?
Of course it hurts, You're getting screwed by an elephant
The casualty figures of our soldiers?? Are you basing this on the official figures?
Hey JL! Probably because she's getting media attention. And they're afraid no doubt she'll start a national movement against the war.
Lt. Calley. Sorry, didn't mean to bust him. It's getting late.
It causes people to ask questions. Bush and his crew don't do very well under rational examination.
Just my impression of what's reported in the lamestream media.
Things are actually going great in Iraq. The bad news we hear is all the result of a great left wing conspiracy - and vast conspiracies arn't kooky when they benefit Bush.
Dear God are you serious?? Anti-Bush bias? They're so far up Bush's rear that they could be suppositories.
That's probably part of it. They seem awfully scared of her, seems like there may be more to it. Just a feeling.
Of course it hurts, You're getting screwed by an elephant
they don't have an anti-bush bias. why would they when bush is doing the bidding of their masters?
Well it sure does seem that they're trying to "kill" her off but they do that to any opposition. So what do you think it could be?
lol
Comments (72 - 236) not displayed.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/LatestShe's simply pissed because she lost her son.
#33. To: christine (#27)
i'm 5'3" 112 lbs. ;)
#34. To: Willie Green (#30)
She told the audience of veterans from World War Two to today's war in Iraq, that the two main things she plans to tell the man she holds responsible for son Casey's death are "Quit saying that U.S. troops died for a noble cause in Iraq, unless you say, 'well, except for Casey Sheehan.' Don't you dare spill any more blood in Casey's name. You do not have permission to use my son's name."
She's simply pissed because she lost her son. Issues of government policy or constitutionality don't mean squat to her. 
One if by land, two if by sea...how many if they are already here?
#35. To: Jethro Tull (#31)
the blind allegiance some hold to the two party system
#36. To: timetobuildaboat (#35)
#37. To: timetobuildaboat, Willie Green (#35)
This Willie Green lunatic still buys into the "two party" paradigm?
#38. To: Jethro Tull (#37)
Since then, I've voted for Perot (twice), Buchanan and Peroutka.
So don't go slandering me with that "two party paradigm" bullcrap just because I refuse to align myself with the left-wing anti-war marxist dingbats.
#39. To: Willie Green (#38)
left-wing anti-war marxist dingbats.
#40. To: Willie Green (#38)
just because I refuse to align myself with the left-wing anti-war marxist dingbats.
#41. To: christine (#5)
hey, willie, why don't you get your warmongering gungho ass over to iraq and fight this war? or better yet, you got your kid over there?
#42. To: Jethro Tull (#0)
#43. To: Jethro Tull (#40)
#44. To: Willie Green (#11)
Just like Sarah Brady, Cindy Sheehan is exploiting the tragic personal sacrifice of a family member to make an emotional statement on the national political stage.
#45. To: RickyJ (#44)
No, she is mad as hell her son died for a damn lie, got it?
#46. To: crack monkey (#18)
She is now taking it upon herself to do something about this. This is a courages act that subjects her to vicious attacks from people like you, Hannity, Michael Savage and the average Freeper. Recall the post WhiteSands made yesterday: "If she had taken better care of her son he wouldn't be dead now".
#47. To: christine (#43)
and he's scored again!
#48. To: historian1944 (#46)
I haven't had that much beer tonight but my mind still can't work its way around the reasoning that parenting caused a soldier's death.
#49. To: Jethro Tull (#40)
Iraq isn't our damn business,
If we were debating whether Papa Bush should help boot Saddam out of Kuwait, I'd probably agree with you.
Let the stinking OPECKers deal with it themselves.
But that's NOT what happened, so the issue becomes what do we do since we ARE involved?
As far as I'm concerned, if Papa Bush got us involved, he shoulda finished Saddam back in Gulf I.
And Klinton should have obliterated Sadddam for violating the no-fly zone.
And Dubya shoulda dropped a grenade down Saddam's "spider hole" instead of capturing the SOB and pi$$ing away more taxpayer dollars on a "trial".
And I don't give a rat's patoot whether or not there were any WMDs.
So we're stuck with "nation building".
I don't like it, but at this point, it is the "right" thing to do.
(as opposed to letting the country collapse into anarchy and civil war.)
#50. To: Willie Green (#49)
As far as I'm concerned, if Papa Bush got us involved, he shoulda finished Saddam back in Gulf I.
#51. To: Willie Green (#38)
Hey, I haven't voted for a Republicrat candidate for POTUS since '88
#52. To: Willie Green (#49)
So we're stuck with "nation building". I don't like it, but at this point, it is the "right" thing to do.
#53. To: Willie Green (#49)
But that's NOT what happened, so the issue becomes what do we do since we ARE involved?
#54. To: Willie Green (#49)
I don't like it, but at this point, it is the "right" thing to do. (as opposed to letting the country collapse into anarchy and civil war.)
#55. To: Willie Green (#49)
#56. To: Zipporah (#50)
We had NO business getting involved in that either esp when Saddam was given the go ahead to attack Kuwait and he was told we had no interest in that conflict.
#57. To: christine (#55)
Lt Odom
#58. To: Zipporah (#54)
Also, what makes you think thats not exactly what's happened?
If there was truly a general uprising of the local populace, casualties would be at least 100x greater and there would be a massive migration of refugees.
#59. To: Willie Green (#58)
If there was truly a general uprising of the local populace, casualties would be at least 100x greater and there
#60. To: Jethro Tull (#0)
#61. To: Willie Green (#58)
The casualty figures are way too low. If there was truly a general uprising of the local populace, casualties would be at least 100x greater and there would be a massive migration of refugees.
#62. To: justlurking (#60)
One little ole woman certainly has them all stirred up..........wonder why?
#63. To: All (#59)
Sgt. Calley
#64. To: justlurking (#60)
One little ole woman certainly has them all stirred up..........wonder why?
#65. To: Zipporah (#61)
Are you basing this on the official figures?
Given their anti-Bush bias, I trust that they'd trumpet much higher figures if that's what was happening.
#66. To: Willie Green (#65)
Given their anti-Bush bias, I trust that they'd trumpet much higher figures if that's what was happening.
#67. To: Willie Green (#65)
ust my impression of what's reported in the lamestream media. Given their anti-Bush bias, I trust that they'd trumpet much higher figures if that's what was happening.
#68. To: Zipporah (#62)
Probably because she's getting media attention. And they're afraid no doubt she'll start a national movement against the war.
#69. To: Willie Green (#65)
#70. To: justlurking (#68)
That's probably part of it. They seem awfully scared of her, seems like there may be more to it. Just a feeling.
#71. To: crack monkey (#66)
Things are actually going great in Iraq. The bad news we hear is all the result of a great left wing conspiracy -
.
.
.